Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CH 4 System Design
CH 4 System Design
Compared to other plants like coal-fired, natural gas and others, cogeneration
power plants efficiency can be up to 85% which is already proven by most of the
countries, including Philippines, where cogeneration power are utilized.
For this chapter, selected CHP system is stated as well as the other technical
options recommended by most designers in choosing the most effective system to attain
well-suited cogeneration.
Figure 4.1 shows the schematic diagram of a cogeneration steam power plant.
38
The selection of combine heat and power system and its design will be discussed
as well as the technical recommendations with accordance of the international and local
standards to come up an effective and well suited cogeneration power plant design.
a. Electrical Requirements
All the power requirements of the site like power for driving the motors
and equipment’s; and
b. Thermal Requirements
Low temperature and pressure steam must be observed for heating
purposes to avoid sticking of juice on the vessel walls.
The fuel supplied is used to first produce power and thermal energy, which is the
by-product of the cycle and is used to satisfy process heat or other thermal requirements.
Topping cycle cogeneration is widely used and is the most popular method of
cogeneration (George, 2009).
39
Figure 4.2 shows the schematic diagram of topping cycle system.
The primary fuel produces high temperature thermal energy and the heat rejected
from the process is used to generate power though a recovery boiler and a turbine
generator. Bottoming cycle is suitable for manufacturing processes that require heat at
high temperature in furnaces and fins, and reject heat at significantly high temperatures.
Bottoming cycle plants are much less common than topping cycle plants (George, 2009).
40
4.1.3 Selected Cogeneration Cycle
To achieve good quality sugar products, low operating pressure of exhaust steam
for process usage should be in the range of 68 to 115 KPa. The sand values are
commonly observed by operating plants in the country to avoid development of color in
the juices as well as destruction of sucrose (SRA).
Cogeneration technologies that have been widely used include steam turbine, gas
turbine, reciprocating engine and heat recovery system. The technologies differ mostly in
the energy conversion device that is used depending on the fluid that is fed into them.
Combine heat and power (CHP) plant that used bagasse as fuel focuses on the operation
of steam turbine cogeneration system, which will be the only type of the system that will
be discussed for the whole design.
Steam turbines are widely used for combined heat and power (CHP) application.
The thermodynamic cycle for the steam turbine is the Rankine Cycle. The cycle is the
basis for conventional power generating stations and consists of a heat source boiler that
converts water to high-pressure steam (Woodruff et. al. 2004).
Since the objective of Cogeneration Plant is to produce steam for the generation of
electricity that satisfy the manufacturing plant, steam turbine cogeneration system is
suitable as the prime mover of the system. The two types of steam turbines for
41
cogeneration system that widely used are back pressure steam turbine and extraction
condensing steam turbine.
42
4.2.1.2 Extraction Condensing Steam Turbine
In order to choose the ideal steam turbine configuration, one has to consider the
requirements and the objectives of the manufacturing plant which is to attain a high
electric generation for the continuous operation of the whole manufacturing plant. And,
also the portion of the whole generated power is for the other plant requirements.
43
In spite of lower thermal efficiency of the system, extraction condensing
cogeneration system produce more electricity which results to more excess power which
is presented in table below.
44
2. Low dust emissions due to stable and almost unmoving bed of embers;
3. Maintenance or replacement of grate bars is easy to handle;
4. Motion assures the automatic rejection of ashes without any type of modification in
the flow or the produced steam; and
5. High burning efficiency.
Travelling grate is a kind of grate and stocker furnace, under overfeed fuel
classification. Table 4.1 shows the combustion analysis of grate and stoker.
45
Figure 4.6 shows the travelling grate furnace.
In fluidized bed combustion, fuel is burned in a bed of hot particles that are
suspended by an upward flow of fluidizing gas. The fuel is solid fuel such as coal, wood
chips, etc. The Fluidizing gas is a combination of the combustion air and the flue gas
products of combustion. When sulphur capture is not required, the fuel ash may be
supplemented by an inert material such as sand to maintain the bed. Bed is use in heat
absorbing surface within or enclosing the bed. The type of combustion technology is
noted for its advantages that are follows (Woodruff et. al. 2004). The advantages of
fluidized bed are noted as follows:
46
Fluidized bed combustion is divided into two types namely bubbling and circulating
fluidized bed. Table 4.2 shows the combustion analysis of fluidized bed.
47
Figure 4.7 shows the Fluidized bed furnace.
The two stated combustion technology is suitable for the sugar manufacturing
plant but it only differ in the requirements of the combined heat plant. The requirements
for selecting the suitable furnace for the CHP plant are stated as follows:
1. Uniform combustion;
2. High burning efficiency;
3. Ability to handle typical prepared size of bagasse;
4. Maintenance; and
5. Low ash emission.
Table 4.3 shows the summary comparison between the two combustion
technologies. The comparison will help to choose what type of combustion technology is
suitable for the requirements of the cogeneration power plant.
48
Table 4.3: Summary Comparison of Combustion Technology
FUEL SIZE Uneven size of fuel can be used 19- Uniform size fuel in range of 1 to10 mm. Bagasse has an uneven size; the
(Uneven size ranges from 2-25 mm) 35 mm. fuel size must comply to the fuel size
requirement of combustion
technology
The combustion is better
version of pile Fuel particles are in fluidized state Easy ash removal system which is
combustion. and there is adequate mixing of appropriate especially bagasse
Heavier size mass falls on
fuel and air. produces a large amount of ash.
the grate.
The fly ash which is produced by Bagasse produces a large amount of
COMBUSTION Ash is removed on a
the combustion remains ash, therefore ash must be removed
continuous basis and a continuous basis to prevent the
suspended.
therefore the chances of building up to clinker.
clinker formation are less.
LHV Travelling grate has a 8000 kJ/kg A heating value of 23000 kJ/kg can be Bagasse has a uniform heating value
( Bagasse has a uniform heating heating value can be burned in stoker burned in a water-cooled fluid bed boiler. of 8214.03 kJ /kg; the LHV of
value of 8214.03 kJ/kg) fired. combustion technology that will be
chosen must be near to the value of
LHV of bagasse
ASH CONTENT Ash content is acceptable based on
( Bagasse fuel has an ash content Ash content range 4%-25% with a dry a high-ash fuel with a low moisture the range from 4-18 %.
range from 4 to 18 percent) basis. content less than 30 percent. Bagasse fuel has an ash content
range from 4 to 18 percent.
49
50
To meet the said parameters, the designers choose traveling grate as its furnace
for the design. The chosen furnace can burn bagasse up to 35 mm size which makes it
more suitable for the designed plant compared to fluidized bed combustion which requires
a very fine fuel particle 6.35 mm. Systematic analysis on the size of bagasse through the
cane preparation and milling equipment can be eliminated using the technology, since it
can cater efficiently a large size of fuel compared to the fluidized bed combustion.
In the Philippines, series of optimization of several sugar mill and refinery is in trend
nowadays. Maintaining minimum of 1 boiler and maximum of 3 boilers for economic
purposes, instead of their existing installations having 5 or more. Therefore, with upgraded
installations; furnace maintenance should lessen to assure the plant can sustain the
energy requirements at any time which could be done by the chosen combustion
technology. Compared to the fluidized bed the chosen combustion technology, which is
traveling grate require less maintenance.
Furthermore, even if a fluidized bed firing is more environmental friendly than the
chosen furnace but through the enhanced pollution facility of a travelling grate furnace,
mainly the ash rejection facility, scrubbers and others and still emission rates can be
efficiently controlled.
The systems are being selected to meet the manufacturing plant requirements and
to come up a suitable design for cogeneration power plant. Table 4.4 shows the selected
systems in the whole design of combine heat plant (CHP).
50
51