BUILDING PLANNER & DESIGNER 459/C (Ground Floor), Khilgaon, Dhaka-1219. Mobile : 01712088029, 01917604347 Ref: Dale 99,2, 2016 To Haji Mohammad Sazadur Rahniin Bill Sub : Submission the Bill for investigation works with Report Dear Sir, We are please to submit herewith the final bill for above mention Subjects at Salna Bazar, Gazipur. SLNo Description of Works Qy [Rate pre Bore | Amout of |” Remark hole Tk - ‘Vest Report | | il Tnvestigati rks with, | 01 | The Soil Trvestigation works wit ves | amas oun | Revert | mobilization, Demobilization of 70 Ft, Submission Lat Test Report. Advance |" 14,000= = qv Pay Amount | _18,000/= In word : BDT neds Five Thousand) Taka Only. Please Make the Payment as a Cash to “ Building Planner & Designer” Thank for your Support Sincerely Yours on behalf of “ Building Planner & Designer” LE ALR Nur-MohammadCLIENT: 4. HAJI MOHAMMAD SAZADUR RAHMAN 2. ENGR. MUHAMMAD ANISUR RAHMAN 3. MRS. FAHMIDA AFROZ 4, DR. MD. BAZLUR RAHMAN REPORT ON: SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED 5 (FIVE) STORIED FACTORY BUILDING AT DAG NO.- S. A. 779, R. S. 1462, KHATIAN NO.- 8. A. 177, 178, R. S. 258, MOUZA- 31 TEK KATHORA MOUZA, TEK KATHORA, POST OFFICE.- SALNA BAZAR, WARD NO. 20, GAZIPUR CITY CORPORATION, GAZIPUR- 1703, BANGLADESH. AUGUST- 2016. SUB SOUL INVESTIGATOR & REPORTED B' BUILDING PLANNER & DESIGNER 413/C, KHILGAON, CHOWDHURYPARA. MOBILE: 01712088029. — aREPORT ON THE SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION: SL. CONTENTS NO. 1, INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY 3. CLIENT 4, LOCATION 5. SCOPE OF WORK 6. FILED WORK 7, LABORATORY TESTS 8, GEOLOGICAL-SET UP & SOIL COMPOSITION 9, CO-RELATION TABLE OF SOILS BASED ON SPT 10. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES. 11. ENGINEERING PROPERTIES, 12, EVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY 13, FORMULA USED FOR COMPUTATION 14, COMPUTATION FOR CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT- 15. CONCLUSIONS 16. RECOMMENDATIONS, ATT. ‘ACHME! A B. @ D. E; F. . SITE PLAN . BORING LOGS . GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS TESTS |. UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TESTS . CONSOLIDATION TESTS. . DIRECT SHEAR TESTS G. EST RESULTS SUMMARY SHEET Bas PAGE NO. woe tan a ew 13 13. 141.0 INTRODUCTION: A reasonably accurate conception about the subsoil parameters of any project site is an essential priority for proper planning and designing the foundation of the concerned structure, So that the structure afler its consiruction word remain safe and stable although out it’s service period. Paying due considerations to those for Haji Mohammad Sazadu¥ Rahman & Gong, was agreed to offer the suh- surface investigation work of the same in favor of Building Planner & Designer, a well reputed geotechnical firm in Dhaka, Bangladesh. According to work order of representative of the client, a detailed sub-soil study was comprising execution of 8 (Eight) number borings 61-71f¢ deep, including the different field and laboratory tests, report submission ete had been undertaken and carried out by Building Planner & Designer, are responsible for soil tests but the Reporter/Engineer is responsible only for Report, during the period of August, 2016. 2.0 METHODOLOGY: Building Planner & Designer, sent one SPT Test team for field test at the sit According to work order, Team Lender of SPT Test team contracted with representative of client for recognizing the selected land and locations for field test. Aer complete the field test, Team Leader collected the signature on Bore Logs sheet from the representative of client. 3.0CLIENT: Haji Mohammad Sazadur Rahman é& Gong, Bangladesh. 4.0 LOCATION: The soil investigation work for construction of proposed 5 (Five) Storied Factory Building at Dag No.- S. A. 779, R, $. 1462, Khatian No- S. A. 177, 178, R. S. 258, Mouze- 31 Tek Kathors Mouza, Tek Kathora, Post Office,- Salna Bazar, Ward No.- 20, Gazipur City Corporation, Gavipur- 1703, Bangladesh. 5.0 SCOPE OF WORK: The main scope of this investigation work are: a, Execution of exploratory boriags, recording of sub-soil stratification and position of ground water table. b. Execution of standard penetration test (SPT) at an interval of 5 fi depth with collection of disturbed soil samples up to final depth exploration of each borings. oO©. Collection of undisturbed soil semples by thin walled Shelby tubes for each bore hele, 4. Preparation of fine report with all works including detailed description of soil stratification sub-soil. e. From them filed tests and laboratory tests, scope of calculation for bearing capacity values for design shalloy foundation. f. For loose and sot strata, from the filed test and laboratory tests, scope calculation for skin friction and bearing values for design deep fouadation. 6.0 FIELD WORKS: All the filed works and filed tests wore conducted as per standard procedure as laid down in ASTM specification are as follows: 6.1 Exploratory Boring drilling: Drilling wes executed by wash boring, method. A hole wes started by driving vertically 2 4°diamewer steel casing into the ground w some depth and then the formation ground casing was broken up by repeated drops of a chopping bit attached to the lower and of drilling pipe. The upper end of the same was forced at high pressure through pressure pipe. Forced slurry or water emerges at high velocity through the pores of the chopping bit, and returns to the surface through the annular space between drilling pipe and the side of the casing or hole, carrying with it the broken-up soil. In this way drilling is advanced up to a level of 6° above the depth, where SPT has to be executed. 6.2 Standard Penetration Test: Standard penetration Tests have been executed in all the bore holes at 5ft intervals of depth up to the final depth of boring, In this test, a split spoon sampler of 2”” ont diameter and 1-3/8"* inmer diameter, is made to peneirate 18 inches, into the soil by drops of a hammer weighing, 140 Ibs. failing freely for a height of 30 inches. Number of blows of hammer required for penetration of each 6 inch length of the sampler are recorded. The number of blows for the last 12 inch penetration of the total 18 inch is know as the standard penetration value (N-values) as specified by ASTM andis plotted the SPT value.of the particular depth. 6.3 Extraction of soil samples: Disturbed soil samples were collected at 5-0" intervals and at every change of soil steata by split spoon sampler. These soil samples were studied visually and the soil classification were done to prepare strate chart of soils up to the explored depth. Before collection of samples, the hole is washed and cleancd the drill pipe with the help of an adapter and is lowered into the hole. 2 ey,The sampler is then pressed down into the ground in one rapid continuous movement until (ie tube, accept 4 inches from the top is filled with soil sample. Undisturbed soil samples are taken at a depth where layer of soil is changed such as 8 ft 12 ft. Undisturbed soil samples are collected by means of thin walled sharp ended 3 inch dia, Shelby tube fiom the cohesive soil formation. The collect tubes were then labeled with detailed job designation, date and shifled to the laboratory for testing, é 1.0 LABORATORY TESTS: All Laboratory Tests conducted on soil samples collected either in the disturbed or in the undisturbed state, All tests were done as per ASTM procedures, are as follow: 1 Natural Moisture content: The water content of a soil sample is the ratio of the weight of the water in the sample to its dry weight. Itis usually expressed as a percentage. The soil sample is ‘weight both in natural stste and in over dry state and Uie moisture content is calculated by dividing the ose of weight of the sample by its dry weight. 7.2 complete grain size Anat The object of grain size aralysis is to dciermine the size of the soil geains, and the percentage by weight of soil particles of different particles size, comprising a soil sample. The process consists of either sieve analysis or hydrometer analysis or both. ‘Phe hydrometer analysis is adopted for sample passing sieve No. 200 For hydrometer analysis, a 40 gas of the over dry sample, is thoroughly mixed with required quantity of water in a calibrated glass cylinder. In order to avoid flocculation, a little dispersing azent is added. The density of the suspension is measured at specified time intervals, by means of a hydrometer or special design. At any particular Lime the size of the largest particle remounting in suspension at the level of the hydrometer can be computed by means of stocks Law, where as he weight of the particles finer than that size, can be computed from the density of the suspension at the same level. The mixture is washed through U.S standard sieve No. 200 and the fraction retained is dried. The fraction retained on each sieve is weighed for calculation of the percentage of differeat fraction. The results are represented by cumulative curves plotted on semi-logarithmic graph paper. 7.3 Atterberg limits: Physical properties of clay are greatly influenced by water content, A given soil behave as a fluid or a soil or, as « plastic materials, depending on how mach water its contains.‘The water contents that correspond to the boundaries between the states of consistency are called as the Atterberg limit, Liquid Limit is the minimum water content at which a clay soil just starts behaving like a fluid, It is determined with the help of a standard limit device which consists of brass cup and an arrangement to impart blows to cep at an uniform rate. The water content at which 25 blows are required is termed as the limit, The plastic limit is the minimum water content at which 2 soil is just plastic andtis determined by rolling out a soil sample at a slowly decreasing water content until, the desired water content is reached, at which a thread of 1/8 inch diameter. Just begging to crumble. The thread is ralled on glass plate with hard, The specific gravity of soil particles (Gs) is defined as ve volume of soil particles to the mass of an cqual for most natural soils falls the ratio of the mass of volume of water at 4°C, The specific gravity of a soli in general range of 2.60 to 2.80. To determine the specific gravity of soil sample, 25 grams of aver dried soil sample is thoroughly pulverized and is placed in a calibrated psychomotor. Water is poured incise the pycnometer until it's top is slightly below the calibrated mark. ‘/he mixture is then boiled thoroughly in order to eliminate all the air bubbles. More water is then added to the mixture till it over night, the temperature is then recorded and the botlle is weighed. The specilic gravity G, is given by: Gs Gt Ws Ws-W1+ W2 Where, Gj = Specific gravity of water at TOC. Ws=The weight of over dry soil (25gms.) W, = Weight af flask + soil + water. Wo = Welght of flask + water. 7.8 Direet shear Test: Direct shear test can be performed for both cohesion tess & cohesive soil to dctermine sheer strength, engle of intemal friction, cohesion ¢, volume change etc. The test ‘s done in a direct shear machine which consisis of a normal loading device, shearing displacement of approximately 10mm per minute is often for a sample used for a sample thickness of about 1.2em, The results of a direct shear test on a cohesion less & cohesive soil can be presented in a summary table & by stress-strain curve, A siress-strain curve nermally consists of shear stress, various: shear displacement for both the undisturbed and the remolded test under a specified normal load the normal load usually varies from 1/3ke/em™ to Lke/em™ Another curve of normal stress verses shearing stress will give engle of internal and cohesion for cohesive soil.7.6 Unconfined Compression Test: Unconfined compression test is a simple method for determination of shearing strength of cohesive soil which is important to determine the bearing capacity of soil, As the name implies, the leteral confining pressure in an unconfined compression test is kept zero, unsupported specimen and at failure is measured. The specimen is prepared from the undisturbed soil sample by carefully trimming it to 2 cylindrical shape of Torp height and 3,5cm dia. The specimen is then placed on the level pedestal of the unconfined compression apparatus in a vertical position. The load is applied axially on the top of the specimen an is distributed uniformly over surface of the specimen with the help of double providing ring assembly fitted with a strain gauge, fitted with the apparatus. The load is applied at such @ tate that the vertical deformation of the sample is nearly 2% (two percent) per minute in order to avoid and drainage during compression. The load is kept increasing until the specimen fails along shearing plane. The maximum load at failure know as the unconfined compressive strength of the sample the shearing strength of the sample is half of the unconfined compressive strength. 7.7 Consolidation Test: The gradual provess of compression of soil under the action of static load and with decrease of void ratio cue to expulsion of water from the soil pores is termed consolidation The phenomenon compressibility characteristics af a soil as the period and magnitude of settlement of a foundation depends on these characteristies. ‘The test is performed on a specimen of circular shape of 6.35cm dia and 2.54cm thickness, The specimen is preparcd from the undisturbed sample by carefully trimming it to the required dimension with the help of a cutting edge and wire saw ‘The specimen is then placed in the consolidation ring and its top and bottom are trimmed off level with that of the ring The specimen along with the ring on the top and the other at the bottom of the specimen. The load is then applied on porous stone and on the specimen with the help of a level arrangement with the apparatus Decreases in volume of specimen ere read fiom a strain gauge attached to the consolidation unit at specified time mtervals the consolidation unit is always kept full with water in order to avoid evaporation of the specimen. The load increment is allowed after each twenty four house, The observed reading are then plotted on semi-logarithmie graph paper to give the pressure-yoid ratio curve from which compression index, Ce Can be calculated Ce is important factor governing the settlement process of underlying soils. &8.0 Geological SET-UP & SOIL COMPOSITION: 8.1 Regional Geology: Geologically, the project area is located in the Terrace. The Terrace is a part of Modhupur Tnlier, an elevated landmass surrounded by the flood plein of the rivers, Ganges, Brahmaputra, Shitalokha and Burhiganga. The clevation of the terrace is about 8m from the MSL, The ‘igrrace is bounded by number of faults. The terrace is formed of elevated dome shaper low hillocks and dish shaped depressions resulted due to erosion, The depressions are interconnected by intricate streams of deep valleys. The present site is located at a shallow depression of the terrace. ‘ectonically the site is located in the deeper part of Bengal basin. No surface folding or faulting could be identified in and around the area, The project area is located in the seismic 2one-II of seismic Zoning Map of Bangladesh where the besic scismic co-efficient may be considered around 0.05. 8.2 description of soil eompositior The following terms are used in this report for description of soil composition: Trace fine sand: 1 to 10% fine sand. Little sili; 11 10 20% silt, Some clay: 20to 35% clay. Sandy silt + 5 to 50% sand & 50 to 70% silt. Clayey silt + 35 to 50% clay & 50 to 70% silt. Silty sand; 35 (0 50% silt & 50 to 70 % sand. 9. 0 CORRELATION TABLE OF SOILS BASED ON SPT-VALUES: ‘Two tables for Non — Cohesive and cohesive soils based on N- Values as below: 9.4 values of Unit Weight And Angle of Internal Friction of Non- Cohesive soil Based on N-Values (After K. ‘Terzaghi and R. B. Peck): ‘Table NO, 1. N-Values Condition Angle Of [Moist Unt Internal We. In Pef. Friction 0-4 Very loose 2530" 70-100 +10 Loose 30°-35 90-115 10-30 ‘Medium [3st 40" 110-140 3050 | Dense. [40% 4s? 110-140 Over 50 Very dense ce 130-150‘The tabulated values apply for dry / moist cohesion less sand. For silty sands the bearing capacity values must be reduced by study of grain size classification and applying judgment. Correction for water table close to bottom of foundation the bearing values should be reduced to half. The bearing values are, however, not affected by the waier table st a depth greater than 1.5B below foundation level, B being least dimension of the bottom of foundation, Bearings values for intermediate position of water table may be reduced by liner interpolation. ’ 9.2 Values of approximate Unconfined Compressive Strength Based on N- Values For Cohesive Soil (After K, Terzaghi and R.B. Peck): ‘able No.- 2 N-Values Condition Unconfined compressive Strength in Tsf, Below 2 Very soft Below 025 24 Soft 48 Medium | 16 Stiff 16-32 { Very stiff 2,00-4.00 Over 32 Hard Over 4.00 In the above table the shear strength of cohesive soil is equal to 1/2 of unconfined compressive strength and the angle of shearing resistance is equal to zero, It should be remembered that the correlation for cohesive soil is always much reliable. 10.0 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES: Physical Properties of the subsoil formation of the project area have been evaluated by the execution of 8 (Eight) nuinber borings 61-74%t deep. The overall physical properties may be summarized as follows: 10.1 Stratification of soil: The twp soil at and around each of borings brown stiff silt, some to little clay, trace fine sand & Brown stiff to very stiff silt, some to little clay, trace to little fine sand & brown very stiff silt, some to little clay, race to little fine sand and the bottom soil is brown medium dense to dense fine sand, little to trace silt. (Ref Bore logs)10.2 Consisteney/Compactmess: Up to the depth of EGL 10 7&, consistency of the top soil usually varies from soft to medium consistency of soil, however, gradually increase the consistency. The subsequent deep layers stiff to very stiff soil state, 40.3 Ground Water Table: The position of Ground Water table (GWT) is about - fi from existing ground. ’ 10.4 Natural moisture content, Unit Weight, Specific Gravity and Limits: ‘Table No. 3. Range of Variation in Laboratory Test Results: Name of the Soil Test No.of Tests | Range of Variation | Natoral Moisture content ig From 15.89% to 23.10%. ‘Natural unit Weight 2 From 127.20 to 128 30pef Dry density 2 From 103.33 to 104.98 pof Specific gravity 18 From 2.672 to 2.685 Liquid Limited 16 From 46% to 50% NP %. _| Plasticity index 16 ‘From 22% to 23% NP= Non Plastic Grain Size a2 From curve 11.0 ENGINEERING PROPERTIES: The engineering properties of soil, including the cohesion, compressibility and the angle of internal gramular friction have been determined by performing laboratory tests on the coil samples collected during filed investigation. These are as follows: 14.4 Cohesion: The values of cohesion, as reported from the performance of unconfined compression (2 nos.) tests very from 28.78 pis to 29.45 pis. 11.2, Compressibility: The top layer of plastic silty soil usually has been observed moderately compressible in nature by consolidation tests (1 nos.), as the values of compression index, form 0.112 and the corresponding values of the initial void ration, very form 0.658. 11.3 Angie of Internal Friction: ‘The angle of internal friction values of the investigated of soil, as reported form the performance of direct shear test (8nos.) very form: 26° to 32°"CITY: 12. 0 RVALUATION OF BEARING C. 12,1 Bearing Capacities of the Shallaw Condition from the SPT: ‘The Bearing capacities of the shallow foundation particularly for the top layer of cohesive soil may be estimated from the SPT values, as suggested by Terzaghi, according to the following rable Table no.- 4, Bearing capacities of the shallow foundation (values in Tsf, F. =3.0): SPT range _| Allowable Bearing Capacity (Taf), E E [Continuous Footing B=4ft | Isolated Column Footing (B-8f1) 02 9.00 - 0.225 0,00 - 0.30 a 0.225 - 0.45 0.30- 0.60 48 0.45- 0.90 0,60 - 1.20 15 0.90- 1.80 1.20- 2.40 15-30 1,80-3.60 2.40-4.80 230 >3.60 > 4.80 Note: fa. width= 4 for strip footing and width = 8f for isolated footing respectively. b. The above values are the net allowable Bearing capaciti ©. The cohesive soil has been considered in a saturated condition. 12.2 Bearing capacity of the shallow foundation from the soil parameters: The bearing capacities of the shallow foundation may more appropriately be determined from the parameters of soil such as (he values of cohesion and the angle of intemal friction as obtained from the performance of laboratory’ tests ‘These have been done considering the general equations of the Bearings capacity of the foundation as suggested by Terzaghi. The evaluated values are provided in the following Table no, 5 and Table no. 6. 9 Ox‘Table No. 5: Bearing Capacities of the Shallow Foundation From Field and Laboratory Test (Values in Tsf, F. S. — 2.50); [ Bore Depth in |” field | Cohesion |_ Bearing capacity (Ist) Hole ft SPT tet For Raft For ’ Foundation | circular or square | footing 5 o 0.56 $25 | 161 10 16 1.00 _ 212 2.72 BH-1 15 18 1.13 2.36 3.08 20 HW 0.68, 1.49, 191 5 8 0,50 Lit 1.46 10 iz 0.75 1.61 2.08 BH2 15 4 0.87 1.87 2.43 20 10 0.62 16. 1.74 5 5 0.31 0.7% | _1.03 10 8 0.50 1 1.46 BH-3 15 12 0.75 161 2,08 20 iL 0.68 1,49 191 5 6 038 | 0,88 1.19 10 i 0.68 1.49 191 BH-4~ 15 12 0.75 L6t 2.08 i: 20 13. 0.81 1.74 225 5 so) est 0.76 [1.03 10 8 0.50 Lit 1.46 BELS 15 9 0.56 1.23 1.61 20 12 0.75 1.61 2.08 | 10a e,‘Table No. 5: Bearing Capacities of the Shallow Foundation From Field and Laboratory Test (Values in Taf, F. 5. = 2.50): Bore | Depthin | field | Cohesion | Bearing capacity (Tsf) Hole ft spt tsf For Raft For t Foundation | circular or square footing _| 5 é 038 oR 1.19 10 Ww 9.62 136 1,74 BH-6 15 |__10 0,62 1.36 1.74 20 12 0.75 161 2.08 as 5 031 0.76 | __—1.03 Ww a 0.68 149 1.91 BHT [_15 R 0.75 “161 2.08 20 15 0.94, 1,99 261 __| 5 7 0.44 0.99 131 10 12 1.61 2.08 BH-8 15 10 136 1.74, 20. 16 212 212 Note: SPT Correction depend on overburden pressure, water table. F. S.= 2.50 as Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC). Table No. 6: Bearing Capacities of The Shallow Foundation From Unconfined Compression Tests (Values in Tsf, F. S. = 2.50): Bore hole No. | Depth, f Unconfined | Allowable bearing capacity, tof Compression | Square footing | For Raft strength, psi, Foundation BH-2— 3.00 28.78 2.34 1,87 (BH 12.0 29.45 2.40 192 10b7.3 Bearing Capacities of Piles from the SPT and soil parameters: ‘Table No. 7: The Skin Friction and the End Bearing Capacities of Piles (F. $.=2.50): BHA 2 BR BHS Deph{N[ Gel & | & | N [Gl tT &R | N] colt | fi |_Ft asf | Tt | Tsf ‘Taf | Taf | Tot Tet | Tot | Tse a | 9 [0.56 | 0.08 = #8 | 0.50 | 0.07] - 5 | 0.31 | 0.04 = 10_| 16 013 | - | 2 [o7s[o10| - | 8 | 050! 007) - [145_| 18 ois | - | 14 [os7[oi2z| - | 12 [075/010] - 20 [at 0.09 | - | 10 |o62/o08| - | 11 [ose | 0.09) - 25 [1s| - [oa3 | 584 | a7 | - | 014/602] 13 | - [0.11] 5.06 30 [20 | - [ois | 935 [24 [= [ozo] ii2 ("a7 | - | ots | 7.95 | 35 119|- | 016 103 | 24 | - [020/130] 19 | - [0.16] 103 40 17| - | 014) 106 20 : 0.16 | 12.4 | 19 - 046 | 11.8 45 [22 | - | 018 154 | 24 | - |020| 168] 20 | - | 0.16 | 14.0 » 27 - 0.22 | 21.0 | 37. oS 0.28 | 28.8 | 20 = O16 | 15.5 35 | 31|- | 0.25 | 265 | 28 | - [023 |240| 25 | - [021 | 214 6 |35|- [0.27 | 32.7 | 29 | - |o2s|ar1| 32 | - [026 | 29.9 65 - : = = 32 | - 0.26 | 32.4 | 30 = 0.25 | 30.4 wm |=|- | + | - | 36 | ps) 028 BH-4 BH Depth | N | Cu i, f, N cu & Ft Tst | Taf | Tsf Tsf | Ts 5 6 | 0.38 | 0.05 - 5 | 031 | 004 10 11 | 0.68 | 0.09 2 8 | 0.50 | 0.07 [45 12 lo7s[o10| - | 9 [055 | 0.08 2 [13 [o8i| oa | - | 12 [075/010 25. 15] - 0.13 | 5.84 15 ~_ | 0.13 30 418| - 0.15 | 8.41 18 -_ | OS 35_|20| - | 0.16 | 109 | 19 | - |e16 40 [20] - [016 | 12.4 | 22 | - | 018 45 _[24| - | 0.20| tos | 24 | - | 020 50 2 | - 0.23 | 21.8 27 - | 0.22 35 [33] - [026 | 282 | 29 | - |0.24| 248) 32 | - [026 | 274 | 6 | 40| - | 030] 374 | 32 | - | 0.26| 299) 37 | - | 0.28 | 340 © [33-026 | 334 | 35 | - [0.27( 354] 33 | - | 0.26 | 33.4) 70 [32 1_- [026 | 349 | 33 | - [026/360] 33 | - [0.26 [360 lla7.3 Bearing Capacities of Piles from the SPT and soil parameters: No. 7: The Skin Friction and the End Bearing Capacities of Piles (F. S.=2.50): BH-7 i BHA Depth | N ] Cu f. fi N |Get) & fy Ft Tst_| Taf Tst Tst_| Tsf 5 3 | 031 | 094 = 7 044 | 0.06 =| 10 i | 0.68 | 0.09 = | 075 | 010 = 5 | 075 | 0.10 = 10 | 062 | 0.08 = 20 ws | 094 | 013 [| - 16 | 190 | 013 = 25 13 | - oi | 506 a 013 | 5.84 30. 16 | = 0.13 7.48 2 =| 010 | s.61 35 5 | = 0.13 | 8.18 5 = 013 [8.18 40 [as | - 0.13 9.35 15 : 013 | 9.35 _| [45 ar lis 014 | 119 7 = 014 | 19 50. 28 | = 0.23 218 2 z 018 | 17.1 55 SnelGs 0.26 274 27 - 022 | 23.1 60 36 [_ - 028 | 33.6 32 = | 026 [29.9 5 a4 |e 027 | 344 32 - 0.26 | 32.4 70 a [ 0.26 | 34.9 30 - | 028 [327 Note: a. N=Blows/ft, Cu = Cohesion. b. f,~ Allowable value of the skin friction. « f,- Allowable value of the pile end bearing capacity. 4 SPT (N) valuesare corrected within calculation, «The values of f, and f have been halved in making prelimitary estimate about the carrying capacity of a Borcd R. C.C. pile. «Inthe case of plastic silty soil, the values of the cohesion have been obiained from the SPT valucs. lib Q13,0 FORMULA USED FOR COMPUTATION: For cohesive soil The ultimate bearing capacity. Quit= CNe= Qy.N.( J. E. Bowles) 2 gall = gy Ne + yD1= dy Ne = yDr (fgetor of safety = 3.00) 23 6 Where, g, = Unconfiaed Compressive Strength in tsf. N= Bearing Capacity Factor 68 square footing. 5.7 continuous footing, Quit= C Ne Se + Dy Ng + 0.5, BN, S,(J. E. Bowles) Where, C = Cohesion, y ~ Unit weight of soil D,= Depth of footing, B— Width of footing No Ny SN, = bearing capacity fectors = F(@) = (N) Qallewable = qulvF. 3. 5-3) (Ref. Book: Foundation Analysis and Design by J .E. Bowles, page no. 213-277), TION (fs) AND END BEARING (f, fs = FCy(M. J. Tomlinson) Where, C; Inconfined Compressive strength of soil and Bearing Capacity Factor (ranges between 0.60 & 45) ~- Cohesive Soil: For high displacement piles, f= 2.0 N Kn / m> For low displacement &,= 1.0 NKN/ m* Where N average of corrected N- value along the length of the pile, For bored piles in sand, f= 14 N(Dy/B) Kn/m’ Where Dy = actual penetration into the granular soil. For bared pile in sand, the unit frictional resistance (f,} is given by F,= 0.67 N KN! m2 (K .R, Arora) Consolidation Settlement: S= (Col I=e9 )* H* log (p’ + “p) / po, (Ref. Book: Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering by K. R. ARORA, Page NO.- 383-450, 638-647 & 1003-1906). 2 @LOAD CALCULATION FOR ANY DIAMETER / ANY LENGTH OF PILE; P=IDL&+n/4 Df, a, p = Allowable working Load. 0. & = Average allowable value of the skin friction c. §, = Allowable valuc of the pile end bearing capacity — - tsf: 4. 11 = pi, a constant = 3.146. ¢. D~ pile Diameter, £ L =Required length of pila ft 14, COMPUTATION FOR CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT: The vertical downward movement of the base of a structure is called settlement and its effect upon the structure depends on its magnitude, its uniformity, the Jength of the time over which it takes piace, and the nature of the clay soils. The consolidation settlement can be calculated form test result of unit weight and consolidation tests, The approximate average settlement depend on super structure Joad. 15, CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of above analysis and discussions, the following conclusions may be drawn regarding the sub-soil condition of the project area. a. The overall soil formation of the investigated site are more or less regular in between the bore hole locations. b. The top layer of the investigated site have been encountered with comprising soft ‘medium stiff/stiff to very stiff silt, some to little clay, trace to little fine sand. (Ref. bore logs). c. The underlying soil is medium dense to dense fine sand, little to trace silt extending up to the final depth of borings (Ref. bore logs). 4d, Bearing capacities for Shallow Foundation as Isolated column footing are shown in Table—5 & 6, ©. Skin friction & End beating capacities are shown in Table-1. f Bearing capacities for shallow foundation including isolated column footing are suitable for all brings (Ref. Tabie-5). 8. Shallow foundation including column footing may be provided at building site for all borings. h. R. C. C. Cast-in-Situ Pile may be provided at building site for all borings. 1316. RECOMMENDATION: On the basis of aforesaid conclusion, the following recommendations are suggested for 5 (Five) Storied Factory Building at Dag No~ S. A. 779, R. S. 1462, Khatian No.- 8. A. 177, 178, R. S. 258, Mouza- 31 Tek Kathora Mouza, Tek Kathora, Post Office.- Salna Bazar, Ward No.- 20, Gazipur City Corporation, Gazipur- 1703, Bangladesh. SHALLOW FOUNDATION as fsolated column footing: The averages bearings capacity of the Shallow Foundation as Isolated column footing may be considcred in the following way: - To be considered 1.50 Tsf (F, S, = 2.5) at a depth of 7ft measured from BGI. each boring particularly at and around the test points far all horings. R.C, C. CAST-IN-SITU PILE: (For all borings). The average bearing capacitics (F. S.= 2.5) of different diameter pile with the embedment length up to 60ft from EGL of each boring may be considered as follows: - 40 Ton for 16 inch dia pile. - 50 Ton for 18 inch dia pile. - 61 Ton for 20 inch dia pile, - 83 Ton for 24 inch dia pile. Note: a. 1 Tsf= 1.094 Kg/em? = 2ksf, 1 Ton = 2000 Ibs = 9.87KN, im=3.28ft, EGL = Existing Ground level & F. $. = Factor of Safety. b. The designer may select any others alternative type, depth as well as the bearing capacity of the foundation in the light of information provided in this report. ¢. Foundation base should be kept dry duting constmction period. d. Pile load test should be performed. If pile load test is not et then value of pile capacity should be considered half. 4 Ares oe YE SEA “. oa oe a SEO en Be « afi (arvoso1 168) NVid SLs YINOISAG ¥ YSNNYTe ONICTINGOPOSED: eee ATION, GAZIPUR- 173, BANGLADESH. Gourd Lert: (-)0 REQIEE Grou War Law: (-) 6.07 BUILDING PLANNER & DESIGNER = STORIED FACTORY BUILDING DAG NOS. A. 78, RS. 1482, KHATANNO’S.4.177, 70, 8250, MOUZHe 31 TEK RATHIORA MQUZA TEX KATO, OFFICE ALMA BAZAR, WAR NO. 2, CATPURITY bs | fos oe rere Hehe ould pe ecarer cc i a r # Lt rE LJ Brown stiff SILT, some to c litle clay, trace fine sand. Brown stil to very sti SILT, some to litle lay, trace to litle fine sand. Brown sti SILT, some to lite clay, trace fo lite fine sand. Brown vary sti SILT, some ‘tb litle clay, trace to litle fina sand. T Tr eS. = Brown medium dense to ‘dense fine SAND, litle to ‘race sit. TCH ia 1B. Hoan oro: oheceneyROPOSED: 5 -: TON: DAG NCL-&. A773, R$. 1661, KHATIANNG.-S.A.177,$7R RS, 258 MOUZA-21 [TEK KATHORA MOUZA, TEX KATHORA, POST OFFICE.-BALNA BAZAR, WARO NO.-20, {GAZIPURCITY CORPORATION, GAZIPUR: 1703, BANGLADESH BUILDING PLANNER & DESIGNER BUILDING =i ea la 9720-2016 fl LITHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION f Brown medium stiff SILT, ‘some clay, trace fine sand. Brown stiff SILT, some to little clay. trace to little fine sand. PoE Sco ———= Brown very stiff SILT, some to little clay, trace to little fine sand. i SSSR SS Treo se Brown medium dense to dense fine SAND, litte to trace silt. CLAY wsuLT SSsanp aiMica 3 ORGANIC CHECKED BYPROPOSED: 5 - STORIED FACTORY BUILDING LOCATION: DAG NO.-S. A. 770, RS. 1462, KHATIAM WO.-8. A. 177, 178,R.S. 258, ONAL SY [Ground Lav (=) =O TEKIATHORAMOUZA, TEX KATHORA POST OFICE- SALMA BAZAR. WARD MO, Grund Wat Love (-) 04° ‘GAZIPUR CITY CORPORATION, GAZPUR. £78, ete: 03-08-2016. RL: (=) UTHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION: x a Brown medium stif SILT, some clay, trace fine sand. Brown medium stif SILT, some clay, trace fine sand. Brown stiff SILT, some to lite clay, trace to little fine sand. Brown very stiff SILT, some to little clay, trace to little fina SILT r sand. Bsunp Brown medium dense to ELLE igo) | Baia dense fine SAND, little to Fy trace silt | | | ORGANIC = Tree CHECKED BY =__BUILDING PLANNER & DESIGNER PROPOSED: 5- STORIED FACTORY BUILDING LOCATION: DAG NOS. A.779,8. $. 1482,KHATIAN NOS. A 177,178, 8,258, MOMZA-31 ‘TEX KATHORA MOUZA, TEK KATHORA, POST OFFICE SALWA BAZAR, WARD NO. 2, (GAZIPUR CITY CORPORATION, GAZPUR. (78, BANGLADESH. [oving Date: 09-08-2016. [Bore Hole No: 4 (Four) Isroure Lane: (-]8% 0° Rebs (-)00r |Ground WitorLevk:(-):6° UTHOLOGICAL DESCRIFION Brown medium stiff SILT, some clay, trace fine sand. Brown stiff SILT, some to little clay, trace to little fine sand. i Ds Eo | ‘Wadi ‘ | He Brown very stiff SILT, some D7 t tolitle clay, trace to little fine l es sand. A 1) ie H j 4 Bisann | i E | Brown medium dense to Bu | i dense fine SAND, litte to ET] | { ‘trace silt. E- faMica | i | aie | pa ’ : I aap | | TESTED BY = : :LITHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION Brown medium stiff SILT, some clay, trace fine sand. Grown medium stiff SILT, some Clay, trace fine sand. Brown stiff SILT, some to litle clay, trace to little fine sand, Brown very stiff SILT, some to little clay, trace to litle fine sand. Trt r a 3 a B " B 1 3 [pz BD os = Boh : oH al i D8 9} i D7] Ey 1 DoF — a5) Tei: ba a ] b-tit || Dt im: 13 | p-t Brown madium dense to dense fine SAND, little to trace silt. ToT ttt Eisanp i@Mica ORGANIC | | CHECKED BY :| Ioertag oat: 19082006 Boge El LITHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION E BUILDING PLANNER & DESIGNER )FOSED: S- STORIED FACTORY BUILDING PRO! BS [Bore Hole No: 6 (ix) LOCATION: DAG WO -8, A779, R142, KNATIAN NOS. A 177, TARE 5.258 OUZA-91 LGround Level: (-) 0-0" [TEKKATHORA MOUZA, TEKKATHORA POST OFFICE-SALIA BAZAR, MARDNO-20, [Ground Water Levek:(-) 0-0" JGAZPUR CITY CORPORATION, GAZPUR. 700, RANGE ADESH. Re: (Jom [ae é al sala Brown medium stiff SILT, some clay, trace fine sand, Brown stiff SILT, some to litle clay, trace to little fine sand. Brown very stiff SILT, some to little clay, trace to little fine sand, Brown medium dense to dense fine SAND, litile to trace silt. Mica ORGANIC ‘CHECKED BY :BUILDING PLANNER & DESIGNER [Boring Dat: 11-00-2016. PROPOSED; 5- STORIED FACTORY BUILDING ]LOCATION: DAG HOS. A. 779, R. 8.1462, KHATIAN NO.-S. A 177, 178, R.5, 258, WOUZA 31 ‘TEXKATHORA MOUZA, TEK KATHORA POST OFFICE. SALNA BAZAR, WARD NO. 2, [GAZPUR CITY CORPORATION, GAZIPUR- 170, BANCLADEGH. Bore Hole (Grou tavet: eee ‘Ground Watar Level: (+) 0" Fk (-) Oar bo d LITHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION a . Brown medium stiff SILT, some clay, trace fine sand. | al patel Brown stiff SILT, some fo [| sit by litile clay, trace to little fine 3 w& fy sand. 1 a = SuLT Brown stiff to very stiff SILT, some to litle clay, trace to litte fine sand. g Esand Brown medium dense to dense fine SAND, ittle to TINICA trace silt. | ELORGANIG 4 (CHECKED BY4 ncaa eaisa = Eeaw Ne @ = ee] = EASA NS F eee a aa oa tep ew weep ee [wnt Te ny Fin joa Toy TTS mee |e te [aml a ee @ ‘ » nas a See 2 Tara aa Tee me |e] e | © [em @ xx x 7 PE TS OORT TAS we © aloe s » | oo 9° AMINED I | avn] suis | soe asians Suiosas Tomy [orn “reawiea mane] moa] senas Boe Fa nen [soo 4 i ag a — used mem g "WesOY OWE TOL) aneizvs NO ‘ALio unaZvs ‘0 “ON ORIYA HNVZVE WNTVS “39140 “L2b°W°3“ON NYLLYEDY ‘er ‘8 '8LL VS “ON OO ‘HOLLYOO} Preteen See NOILNSINLSIC 3ZIS NIVED ‘SWATING AWOL IVS GARIOLS* $0380.nemo acaisal 7 1 = eiel z [ ro eee 7 me ee pe ro Tae = ane De [eee : it wa aaa oe he Wo == z a an i mele pe va carer 0 a jen ema WMS wer |e i 2a 0 oO 0} j tw Crepe HANNO] GLAS | HONS WwOWWOLIBEWIO HOS ‘o1s3d3 “Ln puatwaniy}o win} UAwureideg [anys | ga08 IQHAS: a aa Tw moo = ‘i al [aan | aa Wish | avo ees. a ow vos aa |_NNea [SSNS a ef a ae ‘HSSEVIONYE COL) “anaIZVO WOILYUORUCD| ieee tll NOLINARMISIC 4ZIS NIVYO MINDISAG ? UBNNVTd ONITING VS “ONNVILWEM '8P)’S'W 8Li'¥'S “ONOVE HOLD] SNITING ANOLDY4 HOLS - $:casedo¥4|‘ABR acest ] T | Tle I a eee) = - See io] te ae Fa mx | 6 30% a oO0°9 “ALLAH M1 sano] wie souroussro 168 aus [—iaremomavlon'y| wnamuea frame] soe] sus ioe HOO we. ro Ba aa [Anan [aeRO 2 ee ano aro [ saouyaye es otaan weve" aat ot nena =" ee creas Sento mar] NOILMEIULSIO 3ZIS NIVEO HADEN ES AUMES SUIS ‘Sicinuobvomii smesecanoaHD scab. = = eee @ we ee esx a Wo | i | @ @ 8! E ooo e Z ee & ae Ls | XXX [ae] a2 2 th OR) “AIAN ral 19 T RAVE] ERE [ ON eee ae Se umn ovseusiiy|o'n'n| Wridviuiiea |arewye | 30m ews nice ano Dive | SSW 2g 7c Soke ae © Jo ananys oc Eve VAT 304800 fruoitaai wznon veonuyaL ve-vinon te'8 88H] NOLL AGIMISIC 4ZIS NIVYO YANDISSG ® USNNVTd ONIGTING ‘ULb'Y 3 “ONNYLLYIDI 2591 2 ‘62d 'Y'8~'ON OYA NOUWOOY ONKTINA AMOLOVA GAMOLS -9 :3180d0ulmote g) gous ooo 1 w]e [om xy 2B ef @ [eer e[ ooo ALND i va] sav} ovo [mr omesuvlow'n| enamide |rume| moe] rams PERCENT PASSING Boe r 3 8 a oe ¢ 9 EF ES AG [ wget | S8NCo 0 aie Napa ene aon ys Bice ib ‘EOL: UNeIZvD 'NOWWHOSUCS! AUD UNWIZVS [82 “ON CRIM ‘2VZVE YNTVS “39180 LE0d hneoHuaL Yznon yuoHLV» yal He-vanon se 88 44) NOLLNEIHLSIC 3ZIS NIVYO YANSISS ® VSNNVTd ONICTING "$°ON NVILVHY "Z99) 8 UW 'SLL V8 “ON D¥G :NolL¥30AQ BRYANT Ae PHL ah wee RAO RO omy é | 6 gq L g 2 = > = » ule | i | # e A t = let Ls FH ® oe |_| Lt. t |} fot Joe | Uae ela | eI Wd FEZ) Yeg j-an~ousWdwes 79 ONeIOH aE W96 Geuded |-dn-suedwes zoe poHeDG unananye'erconammunnests slo — SAL NOISSSN¢WOO jysou ta “YzToN HOH AV MEL FE -¥ZNON ez @ 8 92 YANDISSC 8 NSNNV1d ONICTING Brae eieretane ——_ CaNANOONfa paeeo Ag pase Q NOE YO ASL Ni aUNSSENE cos a1 go oF oO Ko 2i¥9 fon) acm nossauanion TT] r | $1 ttt ~ v0 “09 "on ouw i LN | wees Wow) ALICRIGANG | | zvo tose ted inno aseade OES hi TW TALI 1 He ero | | s ips ark ei ant | | : (| 8 t wos a | Pt e——e He | I “usexeiuaamaws | NA | son NOLO 30 [ i ee an-onarouaot + L __ NTR be 90 "HSOV TONE 2044 “unaiZvO ‘NOLLYHOALOD| ‘WHOHL YH Bd VZNON WHORLYY Wal be -YZNOW ‘82 °8 7 ‘2L5) “ALL ¥'S-"O8 NVUNIDE ZaP% ‘SF LL VS “ON OV HaUvO07| ‘RATING AMOLOYS CAROLS -§ASDEON| ‘BAUNO SUNESIUE ©O1-~OILWY CIOA ISS NOWWGMOSNOD YANDISSO ¥ MANNY Id ONIGTINGAg papa sae (a5 NOISaHOO] oo | Tedig NOSEHCD (eai69q) 0 "STONY ONREVEHS) ot (Gail90)_0 "ONY ONAIEHS) “1'8'd N SS3ULS THRUON “1'S"d NISS3RLS TIVBON we h o q ca a ob ¢ f I T ri T ; i ‘ | 8 ¢ 5 @ | a a 8 g A a = & | = ch = Ate a2 = eG { a ab 1409 udeq zra-eyedues 20 ONE e108 14.09 Wed Zi-G~ON edues — 10 ONO/OH G10g HSEOVIONYE ‘G04 -UNdIzvD ‘NOUYEOduOD| ‘Algo Uneltev9'02-"CN CHIVIA VZV WNIVS “AOILAO 160d) HANH NL 'VZNIGA YUOHLYM Mal. 1€ "W2NOW ‘G62 "8" El] Hay w= “ON NWLLVHDL ZObL °s "UGE "Y “2~'ON S¥E:NoLL20} 1831. YVSHS LOauIG USNOISHC 9 YSNNVTd ONIGING3) 5 sf perpaug :fe paisa 520 (3d) 9 'NoIEAHOO $60 1's) 9 "NOISZHOD, ott (esibaa)_O SONY ONIAVAHS| off, (@aibac)_0 ‘STONY ONRWEHS, ‘T'S 'd NI SSEULS WHHON T'S “ANI SSTULS WAYON 0g St oN s 02. oh a 7 Hp at | a I f L | | | | Cr | f | | e I | | t ; é 6H t an | 8 | 2 e o 2 g g 5 ae 4 a > 4 = val cg | i | { mw s. sh iz OL UdeO Fra~oN sues 90 'ON 8/9} 20g “id 09 uded Z1-d-ON eiduies £0 ‘ON Bic} 810g ‘uo wana ona wrve re Scsa0 04 ‘rucnivnal "rZnow VeOHLWD MAL Ls -vznow ae’ '8'eL| 1841 YVSHS 1934/0 YANOISSG ? YSNNWTd ONIGTING AL) "W'S “ON NYLLVHY ‘ZOP 'S °S ‘Gt °¥ 8 “ON O¥d ‘NOLLWDOH| ONGTING AYOLD¥ GIRIOS- #:axE0cou1g peypaug oo oo (3 9 'noigaHo9] 0 ‘9 'NOISSHOO| {seiBga) 0 "STONY ONASHS, ot {oaibec) O' STONY ONESIES) “V'S 4 NI SSSULS WHHON ‘Sd NI SSHMLS TWHHON w st a 8 a o ‘ fe if t YT on" . } | é i sz 2 g 1 | & z g B | a 2 g T ai 4 oe pe (iad a ae “2. ! 5 | I [ | | | ! | ai ! ey OL idea p-0-ON cides —90°ON OICH oHOg 104 uideg fid~oNeldwes — go"0N BoHeNDS upunaaeote“OuasN Bra INTO 04 “4 BYP UNTYS “BOIdHO LE ‘wouwalymonwounnalevmone sue LSAL YVSHS Loud MBNOISHO ? YANNVTd ONITIING “ULb'W'S “ON NVILVHD "20PF’S WH 61 'V'S “ON OG WoLvOC ‘SNATWG ANOLOYA GANUOUS ~ 3:04sig pexpey fe powey | x0 (sd 9 NoISHEA] 090 (re 9 norsaH09) | of (001890) 0 “SIONY ONIUWEHE oft (281690) 0 "FIONY ONIEVSHS, “1S dN SSTRLS TWHLON 13d M SRLS NUON we sh oO ¢ 0. aL Ob $ 0 (ial A I LA é FIT! » 2 of) =| 3 { ao { é 3 1g 3 ae 2 > i dal at a “y WOL dog PI-G~ON eds —gO'ON SIH 2109 WoO Weed pra~oN ewes Z0°ON 81H 0108 jut unaayo 8e0n eh uvave YRS aDH0 4 ‘oe ZOHO *AOHIVY DEL "VZNON YUOHLWD MEL Vt -YZNON 'e5z 84 ‘ELI V4 0: pe Cee) oot Nvdit auId ‘SNITTING AMOLIYA CAROLS *#-cGOdOU USNDISSd 8 HANNVTd ONITTINGsai sara Sf zlel” |# a] wa a whee 8s we 8 * a aa eo * aa sah ae | aLe lo | a oe ate ee . art er a ae ze ee = ei oe (melee ar “a so |e wR Be | | esl ra aes 2 Bl ae ze : ele we t | vel laew see | eee ® i Par = ma ENS as ae aa [eee wy & we Ea lielelien ae] © eet ae ia eee alo iam eahaee a cee lense’ colar | a g}aowslieh neyo] # | kevoRmDo] weg | “roms | uni (dmauraliehwBemlomeaen| yey os | oy L225 RO eLwag nag | SOLeRa UNL SRNL PUT | ‘ns lesen mney] tun ddl -wtien| wae acne bos o6g| “HSSOV TONE TOL) “BIA NOLLTUDEWOS| soar arenes a crow 94h YANOISSO 8 HANNYTd ONITTING "WROBEL JEL “YZNOW WROHLY Mad. He “VZOW ‘S50 8H BLK yaoi at ton nowPraiie eo 83961 SL INGRY SAL JO AUVWNS ren tur- sags y i ee [| of wa | o [a wo] aa we [i [e [a ale ale we | a fa | | wlio | we af 2} % al @ wo | al | Curry a[ | oe Ee alta a| e[ « [e a | Ho ale | ta wz] ol «| « ele ce | # saz {io | al w | 20 Javea Cw aire | Od xrsftsawslise ureeyeg| | ne) LAS wey svg omg | vou mee cou] tan] wai] neem when] ge] ew | ay waapipasy | WIewnco pea) ema) ape lomcy ena antalya | a Jean inwnw sao SER NETS Oe ALG es MANODISAC ? MSNNW1d ONIGTING ‘ppionea anon yucr nie ie vncn we ge! SLINSAY LSS 4O ANVINANS aaa isaty sonics aa