Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design and Development of A Novel Cellul
Design and Development of A Novel Cellul
PAPER
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 13657–13665 | 13657
RSC Advances Paper
Fig. 1 EDX analysis of cellulose/g-Fe2O3/Ag nanocomposite. Fig. 3 FE-SEM images of cellulose/g-Fe2O3/Ag nanocomposite.
13658 | RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 13657–13665 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Paper RSC Advances
Results and discussion size distribution chart is obtained. According to this chart the
particle size distribution is narrow and the size of most of the
To study the morphology and characterization of cellulose/g- particles is about 15–20 nm (Fig. 4).
Fe2O3/Ag nanocomposite, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy The magnetic property of the nanocomposite was charac-
(EDX) and X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) were used. EDX and terized using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) at room
XRD patterns shown in Fig. 1 and 2, result further certify the
formation of Ag and g-Fe2O3 nanoparticles in cellulose micro-
crystal. The peaks located at 2q ¼ 30.2, 35.6, 57.4, 63.0 are
related to Fe2O3, the peaks located at 2q ¼ 38.1, 44.2, 64.4, 77.4,
are related to Ag and also the peak presented at 2q around 20 is
related to cellulose. Identied peaks in XRD patterns were
assigned to the well-crystallized silver (JCPDS 04-0783) and
g-Fe2O3 (JCPDS 25-1402) nanoparticles. Elemental mapping of
EDX patterns show that elements Fe, Ag, O, and carbon (Au
existence in the nanocomposite is due to its implementation as
a coating for material conductivity) exist in the nanocomposite.
Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM)
images also, were used for showing nanostructured surface of
the nanocomposite (Fig. 3). According to these images, particle
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 13657–13665 | 13659
RSC Advances Paper
Table 2 Synthesis of 2,4,5-trisubstituted-1H-imidazoles 4a–o using cellulose/g-Fe2O3/Ag nanocatalyst under solvent-free conditions
13660 | RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 13657–13665 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Paper RSC Advances
Table 2 (Contd. )
a
Isolated yield.
temperature (Fig. 5). The magnetic property of the cellulose/ Main weight loss is happened at 370–410 C that is for
g-Fe2O3 is 13.2 emu g1. The magnetic property of cellulose/ decomposition of organic materials presented in the nano-
g-Fe2O3/Ag nanocomposite is about 6.4 emu g1. This dropping composite. This weight loss temperature in contrast with
in the magnetic potential is due to the addition of Ag NPs to the cellulose weight loss temperature that is about 250–260 C has
cellulose/g-Fe2O3. The obtained nanocomposite has a good been signicantly increased and as a result its thermal stability
magnetic potential and can be separated from the reaction has been improved.
medium easily by a magnet. To investigate the catalytic ability of cellulose/g-Fe2O3/Ag
Thermal gravimetric analysis/differential thermal analysis nanocomposite, a pilot experiment was carried out from the
(TGA/DTA) of the cellulose/g-Fe2O3/Ag nanocomposite is shown reaction of benzil 2, benzaldehyde 3 and ammonium acetate to
in Fig. 6. A slight weight loss can be observed below 250–260 C produce 2,4,5-triphenyl-1H-imidazole 4a. Aer several tests, we
that is related to the decomposition of a tiny amount of cellu- realized that the optimized conditions for the reaction is using
lose in the nanocomposite. Another weight loss is seen at 300– 0.015 g of cellulose/g-Fe2O3/Ag at 100 C under solvent-free
320 C that is related to decomposition of other impurities. conditions in a reasonable and short reaction time
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 13657–13665 | 13661
RSC Advances Paper
Table 3 Synthesis of a-aminonitriles (8a–e) in the presence of a catalytic amount of cellulose/g-Fe2O3/Ag nanocomposite under solvent-free
conditions
Time Yield
Entry R1 R3 Product (min) (%)
1 4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl 8a 20 85
2 2-Chlorophenyl Phenyl 8b 25 86
3 Phenyl Phenyl 8c 25 82
4 4-Methoxyphenyl Phenyl 8d 35 83
5 4-Chlorophenyl 4-Methylphenyl 8e 40 80
13662 | RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 13657–13665 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Paper RSC Advances
Experimental section
General
All the solvents, chemicals and reagents were purchased from
Merck, Fluka and Aldrich. Melting points were measured on an
Electrothermal 9100 apparatus and are uncorrected. IR spectra
were recorded on a Shimadzu IR-470 spectrometer by the
method of KBr pellet. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on
a Bruker DRX-500 Avance spectrometer at 500 and 125 MHz,
respectively. FE-SEM images were obtained on a Sigma Zeiss.
EDX spectra were recorded on Numerix DXP–X10P. XRD
measurements were carried out using a JEOL JDX–8030 (30 kV,
20 mA). TGA/DTA was measured by a STA504. Magnetic
Fig. 7 Reusability of cellulose/g-Fe2O3/Ag for the synthesis of 4a. susceptibility measurements were performed using a Lake
Shore VSM 7410. The products were identied by comparison of
their spectroscopic and analytical data with authentic samples.
Table 4 Results of antibacterial assays of nanomaterial and its
components
MIC MBC MIC MBC First, 1 g of PEG-2000 and 8.0 g of NaOH were added into 90 mL
Sample (mg mL1) (mg mL1) (mg mL1) (mg mL1) of ultrapure water to prepare the mixture aqueous solution of
PEG/NaOH. Then, 2 g of cellulose was added to the mixture and
Cellulose 512 >1024 >1024 >1024
swell for 3 h at room temperature. Then the suspension was
g-Fe2O3 >1024 >1024 >1024 >1024
Cellulose/g-Fe2O3/Ag 512 1024 1024 1024 cooled down to 15 C and held at that temperature overnight
Cexime 2 16 8 32 (12 h) until it became a solid frozen mass. The frozen solid was
then allowed to thaw out at room temperature under strong
stirring, and at the end a homogeneous cellulose solution was
obtained. FeCl3$6H2O and FeCl2$4H2O of 4.5 and 1.5 g,
antibacterial effects on assessed concentrations. Cexime as respectively, were dissolved in 15 mL distilled water with
broad-spectrum commercially available antibiotic, could inhibit vigorous stirring at room temperature, and then the iron solu-
or kill the microorganisms in concentrations ranging from 2 to 32 tion was added drop wise into the cellulose solution for 2.5 h.
mg mL1. A few studies have shown that the surface of Ag NPs can The resultant cellulose/g-Fe2O3 composites were ltered
generate free radical and induce the membrane damage subse- washed with distilled water until Cl ion was completely
quently. Also, the oxygen can easily oxidize Ag NPs to generate removed. Then, the obtained composite was loaded into 50 mL
partially oxidized Ag with chemisorbed Ag+ that would lead to the distilled water and stirred for 2 h to the dispersion of the
destruction of the cell membrane of bacteria.23–25 composite. Then, 0.2 g trisodium citrate, as stabilizer, was
added to a 20 mL of AgNO3 solution (0.05 M). Subsequently, this
solution was added to the previous solution and the resulted
Conclusions mixture was stirred for 30 min. Then, 5 mL NaBH4 was added
dropwise within 2 h. The resultant cellulose/g-Fe2O3/Ag nano-
In summary, we have introduced a new protocol for the
composite was washed with water for several time and was dried
synthesis of a biopolymer-based nanocomposite applicable
at room temperature.
either as a nanocatalyst in the synthesis of organic compounds
or as an antimicrobial agent. Efficient syntheses of 2,4,5-
trisubstituted-1H-imidazoles were carried out starting from
simple and readily available precursors including benzoin or Typical procedure for the preparation of 2,4,5-triphenyl-1H-
benzil, benzaldehyde and NH4OAc in the presence of a catalytic imidazole 4a
amount of cellulose/g-Fe2O3/Ag nanocomposite. A large The mixture of benzoin or benzil (1 mmol), a benzaldehyde
number of unique properties of this catalyst were observed (1 mmol) and ammonium acetate (2.5 mmol) was heated at 100
including short reaction times, easy workup procedure, reus- C (bath temperature) in the presence of cellulose/g-Fe2O3/Ag
ability of the catalyst, high atom economy, excellent yields and (0.015 g) under solvent-free conditions. Aer the completion of
environmentally benign reaction conditions. The antibacterial the reaction, as indicated by TLC, the resulting mixture was
tests of the nanocomposite showed a strong antimicrobial dissolved in 10 mL of EtOH and the catalyst was removed easily
activity against S. aureus (Gram-positive bacteria), and its ability by adsorbing on the magnetic stirring bar when the stirring was
to kill the bacteria in a short time. This demonstrates the stopped. Then, the resulted solution was ltered off and the
nanocomposite has a potential application in the medical and ltrate was evaporated under reduced pressure to afford a pure
health care elds. product.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 13657–13665 | 13663
RSC Advances Paper
Selected spectral data for 4,5-diphenyl-2-p-tolyl-1H-imidazole (MHB). Then, bacterial suspensions of each bacterial strain
(4c) were prepared from freshly cultured bacteria in sterile normal
saline that were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard turbidity.
Mp: 228–230 C; FT-IR (KBr, cm1): 1446, 1496, 1600, 3033; 1H
The suspension was further diluted (1 : 100) by sterile MHB just
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d (ppm); 2.3 (3H, s, CH3), 7.2–7.6 (12H,
before adding to the wells containing a serial dilution of each
m, H–Ar), 7.7 (2H, d, J ¼ 13.0 Hz, H–Ar), 9.6 (1H, s, NH); 13C
sample. MICs were recorded aer 22 h incubation at 37 C as
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): 21.7, 125.6, 127.5, 128.2, 128.7, 128.8,
the lowest concentration which could inhibit visible growth of
128.9, 129.1, 130.0, 139.2, 146.6.
bacteria. 100 mL of all wells contained higher concentration
than MIC value were cultured onto nutrient agar plate and MBC
Selected spectral data for 4,5-diphenyl-2-3-nitrophenyl-1H-
were recorded aer 22 h incubation at 37 C as the lowest
imidazole (4g)
concentration which could kill 99.9% of assessed bacterial cells.
Mp: >300 C; FT-IR (KBr, cm1): 1350, 1526, 3068, 3448; 1H NMR Cexime was used as standard antibiotic and all experiments
(500 MHz, CDCl3): d (ppm); 6.99–7.11 (1H, d, J ¼ 13.0 Hz, H–Ar), were done in triplicate.
7.20–7.24 (1H, m, H–Ar), 7.25–7.31 (3H, m, H–Ar), 7.37 (1H, t, J
¼ 13.0 Hz, H–Ar), 7.41–7.44 (2H, t, J ¼ 12.5 Hz, H–Ar), 7.47–7.49
(3H, d, J ¼ 13.0 Hz, H–Ar), 7.51–7.53 (3H, m, H–Ar), 9.6 (1H, s,
Acknowledgements
NH); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): 119.4, 122.6, 127.1, 128.4, The authors gratefully acknowledge the nancial support from
128.7, 128.9, 129.1, 130.4, 131.2, 131.8, 143.4, 148.4. the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) and partial
support from the Research Council of the Iran University of
Typical procedure for the preparation of 2-(N-anilino)-2-(4- Science and Technology.
chlorophenyl)acetonitrile (8a)
A mixture of 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (0.140 g, 1 mmol), aniline Notes and references
(0.093 g, 1 mmol), and TMSCN (0.120 g, 1.2 mmol) was stirred
for 20 min in the presence of cellulose/g-Fe2O3/Ag (0.015 g) 1 W. J. Parak, A. E. Nel and P. S. Weiss, ACS Nano, 2015, 9,
under solvent-free conditions. Aer completion of the reaction, 6637.
as indicated by TLC, the resulting mixture was dissolved in 2 E. C. Tyo and S. Vajda, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2015, 10, 577.
10 mL of EtOH and the catalyst was removed easily by adsorbing 3 R. O. Herzog, J. Phys. Chem., 1925, 30, 457.
on the magnetic stirring bar when the stirring was stopped. 4 F. Quignard and A. Choplin, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1, 21.
Then, the resulted solution was ltered off and the ltrate was 5 E. Coronado, C. Martı́-Gastaldo, E. N. Moratalla, A. Ribera,
evaporated under reduced pressure to afford a pure product. S. J. Blundell and P. J. Baker, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 1031.
Further purication was followed by crystallization from 6 A. Desireddy, B. E. Conn, J. Guo, B. Yoon, R. N. Barnett,
ethanol to give product 4a as pale yellow crystals. B. M. Monahan, K. Kirschbaum, W. P. Griffith,
R. L. Whetten, U. Landman and T. P. Bigioni, Nature, 2013,
Characterization data of 2-(4-tolylamino)-2-(4-chlorophenyl)- 501, 399.
acetonitrile (8e) 7 I. Barke, H. Hartmann, D. Rupp, L. Flückiger, M. Sauppe,
M. Adolph, S. Schorb, C. Bostedt, R. Treusch, C. Peltz,
Mp 92–94 C; FT-IR (KBr, cm1): 3348, 2925, 2366, 1627, 1525,
S. Bartling, T. Fennel, K. H. M. Broer and T. Möller, Nat.
1497, 1096, 820; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): dH (ppm) ¼ 2.35
Commun., 2015, 6, 51.
(3H, s, CH3), 3.93 (1H, d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, CH), 5.50 (1H, d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz,
8 S. Lin, Y. Cheng, J. Liu and M. R. Wiesner, Langmuir, 2012,
NH), 6.71 (2H, d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H–Ar), 7.12 (2H, d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H–
28, 4178.
Ar), 7.47 (2H, d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H–Ar), 7.59 (2H, d, J ¼ 8.5, H–Ar); 13C
9 U. Chatterjee, S. K. Jewrajka and S. Guha, Polym. Compos.,
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): 21.6, 50.1, 114.7, 118.1, 128.6, 129.5,
2009, 30, 827.
129.9, 130.0, 132.6, 135.5, 142.2.
10 (a) M. Bhushan, S. Muthukamalam, S. Sudharani and
A. K. Viswanath, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 32006; (b) Z. Liu,
Antibacterial property W. Guo, C. Guo and S. Liu, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 72872.
Two standard bacterial strains were assessed as models of 11 T. Maneerung, S. Tokura and R. Rujiravanit, Carbohydr.
Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923) and Gram- Polym., 2008, 72, 43.
negative (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922) bacteria. 12 H. Kong and J. Jang, Langmuir, 2008, 24, 2051.
Broth micro-dilution method was performed according to 13 M. Sureshkumar, D. Y. Siswanto and C.-K. Lee, J. Mater.
the standard protocols of CLSI (Clinical Laboratory Standard Chem., 2010, 20, 6948.
Institute) to determine the minimum concentration of each 14 (a) A. Maleki and R. Paydar, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 33177; (b)
sample required for inhibition of visible growth of tested A. Maleki, R. Rahimi, S. Maleki and N. Hamidi, RSC Adv.,
bacterium (MIC) and minimum concentration of samples 2014, 4, 29765.
which result in killing of the assessed microorganism (MBC). In 15 (a) A. Maleki, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 64169; (b) A. Maleki,
brief, two-fold serial dilutions of each sample were made in N. Ghamari and M. Kamalzare, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 9416; (c)
a concentration ranging from 1024 to 0.5 mg mL1 in sterile A. Maleki, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2014, 97, 587; (d) A. Maleki,
plastic micro-dilution trays containing Mueller Hinton broth Tetrahedron, 2012, 68, 7827; (e) A. Maleki, Tetrahedron Lett.,
13664 | RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 13657–13665 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Paper RSC Advances
2013, 54, 2055; (f) A. Maleki and M. Kamalzare, Catal. 19 I. Lantos, W. Y. Zhang, X. Shui and D. S. Eggleston, J. Org.
Commun., 2014, 53, 67. Chem., 1993, 58, 7092.
16 (a) G. Gudipudi, S. R. Sagurthi, S. Perugu, G. Achaiah and 20 T. D. A. Kumar, N. Yamini, C. Subrahmanyam and
G. L. David Krupadanam, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 56489; (b) K. Satyanarayana, Synth. Commun., 2014, 44, 2256.
N. Iqbal, J. Hashim, S. A. Ali, A. R. Mariya, R. D. Alharthy, 21 G. H. Mahdavinia, A. M. Amani and H. Sepehrian, Chin. J.
S. Ahmad, K. M. Khan, F. Z. Basha, S. T. Moin and Chem., 2012, 30, 703.
A. Hameed, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 95061; (c) J. Jayabharathi, 22 M. Bakavoli, H. Eshghi, M. Rahimizadeh,
M. Sundharesan, A. Prabhakaran and C. Karunakaran, RSC M. R. Housaindokht, A. Mohammadi and H. Monhemi,
Adv., 2015, 5, 9518; (d) M. N. Khan, S. Pal, S. Karamthulla Res. Chem. Intermed., 2013, 41, 3497.
and L. H. Choudhury, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3732. 23 A. Henglein, Chem. Mater., 1998, 10, 444.
17 M. Kidwai, P. Mothsra, V. Bansal, R. K. Somvanshi, 24 C. N. Lok, C. M. Ho, R. Chen, Q. Y. He, W. Y. Yu, H. Z. Sun,
A. S. Ethayathulla, S. Dey and T. P. Singh, J. Mol. Catal. A: P. K. H. Tam, J. F. Chiu and C. M. Che, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem.,
Chem., 2007, 265, 177. 2007, 12, 527.
18 S. E. Wolkenberg, D. D. Wisnoski, W. H. Leister, Y. Wang, 25 Y. Xu, L. Zuo, T. Lin, J. Wang and X. Yue, Polym. Compos.,
Z. Zhao and C. W. Lindsley, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 1453. 2015, 36, 2220.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 13657–13665 | 13665