Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Practical Vedanta by Swami Vivekananda
Practical Vedanta by Swami Vivekananda
Chapter IV
PRACTICAL VEDANTA
74
First, it elevates religion into spiritualism and at that stage all faiths, all
scriptures, and idolatry appear to be different faces of the same truth. So the
Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, the Jains all should feel that they are the
different expressions of the same Almighty God. So at the lower level they
should freely propagate their rehgion and practise religious rites and rituals.
But tlirough religion they would be able to elevate themselves to the feeling
of the quintessence of all faiths that all living beings are God at hand and
serving the cause of others is in fact serving Divine Will. This is Swamiji's
approach to nation-building in India. This approach begins with religion but
ends in society and economy. Swamiji felt that Indians are essentially bound
by religious ties and only a spiritual elevation of religion could unite them
beyond faiths, caste, community and sub-national and etlinic identities. Then
and only then all Indians will be permeated by a common bond of nation
alism.
But at the same time Swamiji felt that the common bond could not be
artificially created so long as most Indians live in abject poverty, illiteracy,
blind faith steeped in rituals and superstition and are subject to exploitation
directly by the high caste, communal, social and political leaders and indi
rectly by the alien rulers and their henchmen in the forms of metropolitan
English-educated 'Bhadrolok'^ professional and land-owning class. Then there
was also the exploitation by the rural land-owners and the money-lending
class, all sorts of torture, physical and mental over women and the bonded
labour. Under such circumstances, a loaf of bread, a permanent shelter and
source of income, provision for basic health and education and along with all
this social equality and freedom are far more important than 'Gita' or 'Koran'
or 'Bible'. But this transformation of society and economy require time and
investment. Meanwhile, Swamiji would seek to create scores of young men
and women with devotion and dedication who are prepared to sacrifice
personal comfort and interest for the sake of the poorest of the poor. In
76
order to create such a band of youth proper training of the body, mind and
soul IS required and Swamiji would strive for giving his scheme of education
what we now call 'Man-making' Education. Apart from Education Swamiji
would require an organisation with India-wide and world-wide branches for
social and educational service in India and for the propagation of the teach
ings of traditional Vedanta in the West. As has already been said arranging
money for this Swamiji went to America and his success was amazing.’ As
a nation-builder Swamiji's concrete contribution lies in his concept of 'Prac
tical Vedanta' which in concrete terms can be actualised through Man-making
Education and Social Organisation.
Vedantism and its practical application rest may be traced to the Vedas and
the Upanishads. But it was Sri Ramakrishna who demonstrated and synthe
sized them through his manifold spiritual experience. He also gave them so
simple, direct and unfaltering expression as to dispel all doubts and misgiv
ings from the minds of the modem rationalists and unbending unbelievers,
even Swami Vivekananda (then Narendranath Datta) not excepted. We are
to consider what these fundamental principles of Neo-Vedantism and its
application, as taught by Sri Ramakrishna, are and how Swami Vivekananda
developed them into a philosophy of practical Vedanta. But in order to bring
out its distinctive features, we have first to state briefly the main positions
of Advaita Vedanta as developed by Shankaracharya.
world of many material things, bodies and minds, which exists as a matter
of fact and is perceived by us. Therefore it caimot be called unreal in the
sense of being mere negation or nothing or void. At the same time, being
impennanent and contradicted and destroyed, or at least contradictable and
destructible, it is rejected by Brahman and so cannot be called real either.
Strictly speaking, the world never exists in Brahman and will never exist.
Such is the metaphysical status of the world in Shankara's Advaita philoso
phy
As ignorance about the real nature of the self is the root-cause of bondage,
liberation is to be attained through knowledge of the self as identical with
Brahman. What is necessary for this knowledge is the study of the Vedanta
and reflection and meditation on the truths learnt jfrom it, till there is a clear
realization of the truth that the self is Brahman (tat-tvam-asi) in the form
'lam Brahman'. The performance of religious works like rituals or devotion
to and worship of God cannot lead to liberation, for they pre-suppose the
reality of the many - the worshipper, the worshipped and the offerings, etc.
Hence instead of destroying ignorance and the illusion of the world, they
would bind us more to the world. Of couse, religious works purify the mind
and generate in us the desire to know Brahman. But after that, ignorance can
be removed and liberation attained only tlirough knowledge of the Self or of
Brahman. The hberated soul may continue to live in the body for some time
on account of the Karmas that have already begun to bear fruits (prarabadha
- Karma). But the liberated soul does never again identify itself with the
body. The world still appears before him, but he is not deceived by it. He
is therefore, not affected by the world's misery. He is in the world and yet
out of it. The man who has in this life attained to this state is called the
'living free' (jivan - mukta). But liberation is not the production of anything
new. It is only a clear and steady recognition of what is always there,
namely the identity of the self and Brahman. Liberation is not merely the
79
absence of misery which arises from the false sense or distinction between
the self and Brahman. On the other hand, it is a state of positive bliss
(ananda), because Brahman is bhss and liberation is identity with Brahman.
First, Sri Ramakrishna teaches that Brahman and Shakti or Kali are not two
different realities or existences inseparably related to each other as substance
and quality. They are only two aspects of the same reality or two states of
the same thing and, therefore, non-different (abheda).
tation, and Bhagavan or Personal God for the Bhakta or the man of devo
tion, This means that the absolute Reality may be formless or It may have
forms, so that the worship of the forms of God has not less value and
validity than the worship of the formless Brahman.
everywhere. 'Desire to live a hundred years', he says, "have all earthly de
sires, if you wish, only deify them, convert them into heaven . . .Thus
working, you will find the way out. There is no other way. If a man plunges
headlong into foolish luxuries of the world without knowing the truth, he has
missed his footing, he cannot reach the goal. And if a man curses the world,
goes into a forest, mortifies his flesh and kills himself little by little by
starvation, makes his heart a barren waste, kills out all feeling, and becomes
harsh, stem, and dried up, that man also has missed the way. These are the
two extremes, the two mistakes at either end. Both have lost the way, both
have missed the goal"^ All this may be summed up in one single and simple
utterance of Sri Ramakrishna; 'Do whatever you like with the knowledge of
the non-dual Brahman tied up in a comer of your cloth (i.e. in your posses
sion).'
Like Sri Ramakrishna, Swami Vivekananda holds that Advaita and Dvaita
and Vishishtadvaita are all tme and that the descriptions of Brahman given
by them relate to the same reality. In Advaita, Brahman has no quality, no
form (nirguna). It is indeterminate and impersonal. It is neither a creator nor
sustainer, nor destroyer of the world, neither omnipotent nor omniscient,
neither gracious nor merciful. But for Dvaita and Vishishtadvaita, Braliman
has all good qualities. He has also forms (saguna). He is a Personal Being
and is the omnipotent and omniscient creator, sustainer and destroyer of the
world,
these four directions is his ideal of rehgion. And this ideal, he thinks, is
attained by what we, in India, call Yoga - Union.
The best parts of the Vedanta philosophy, he thinks, were not the outcome
of meditation in the forests only, but were thought out and expressed by
brains which were busiest in the everyday affairs of life.
The first thing that we should constantly bear in mind is that our life is one
and that there is one life in all. It is not true to say that we live two lives,
one religious and the other worldly. It is the same life that we live when we
are religious and also when we are engaged in ordinary worldly activities. If
we sincerely believe in this, then the ideals of religion will more and more
enter into all our thoughts and shape our practical conduct.
"The Vedanta can be carried into our everyday life, the city life, the country
life, the national life, and the home life of every nation.*^" A rehgion that
cannot be put into practice, that cannot help man wherever he may be, is not
of much use and value. Judged by this test Vedanta will be found practical.
again and suffer thousands of miseries, so that I may worship the only God
that exists, the only God I believe in, the sum total of all souls and above
all, my God the wicked, my God the miserable, my God the poor of all
races, of all species, is the special object of my worship.'^"
Swamiji awakened the slumbering nation with the lion-roar, 'Arise, Awake,
and stop not till the goal is reached !' The Vedanta, the Upanishads, exhort
us to overcome sloth, idleness, inertia, weakness and faintheartedness. We
need strength, Real strength is the spiritual power of the Self
For him nationalism did not mean merely love of our motherland stretching
84
from the Himalayas to Kanyakumari, but also means that we should love our
religion and culture, our spiritual heritage and scriptures, and should feel
proud of them. It also means that we should have love and reverence for all
the great men and women in our history and revere their memory. At the
same time we should love the poor, the downtrodden, the helpless and
miserable who are with us.
A fully integrated society is not practically possible in India unless the con
dition of poor and mis^-able people is improved. Swamiji always held that
their uplift is the basic pre-condition for building up the great India of the
future that he in his fervent patriotism visualized. He said that no amount of
politics would be of any avail until the masses in India are once more well-
educated, well-fed, and well-cared for.
Swami Vivekananda advocated the practical Vedanta. The Vedanta holds not
only that all men are one in spiritual brotherhood, but that the last word in
religion is man's reahzation of his essential oneness with the entire universe.
"The central teaching of the Vedanta - the Upanishads - is how to realize
thie oneness. In the sense of spiritual oneness alone comes love and fearless
ness; separation leads us to hatred and fear. Swamiji also taught that ...
oneness is the secret of everything and everywhere we are one.^'^" He wanted
a twofold application of Vedanta in our practical day-to-day life - one, for
awakening man's faith in himself and his own strength, and two, selfless
work in the spirit of serving all men in the spirit of serving God. Swamiji
says, 'Look upon every man, woman, and everyone as God. You cannot help
anyone. You can only serve; serve the children of the Lord, serve the Lord
Himself if you have the privilege.
3. Brahmo Samaj was both a theory and a movement that arose in the
nineteenth century Bengal in direct response to Bengal Renaissance
and the spread of English education among the Bengali middle class
and the landed aristocracy. It stood for a rational approach to religion,
equality and liberty of man and the spread of education both English
and Vernacular and the empowerment of women. It protested against
image worship and all other orthodox Hindu rites and rituals attached
to it, age-old caste system and other social evils. Since the social
ground was not prepared, its influence was limited to a select group
of people.
14. Ibid, R 56