Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Child and Adolescent Parenting Styles

Development – • Authoritarian Parenting


Family Influences • This parenting style emphasises control
and unquestioning obedience.
• Parents try to make their children conform
a set standard of conduct and do not
explain why the rules are set in that way.
Dr Sau Yin LAU
The Open University of Hong Kong • They punish their children arbitrarily and
EDU E253F forcefully for violating the rules they set.
Spring Term 2020
• They rarely give affection and praise to
their children.

1 4

Family Influences Parenting Styles


• As one of the microsystems, family is • Authoritarian Parenting
influential on a child’s development. • Authoritarian parents usually do not allow
• Issues around family influences include: their children to make decisions
• Parenting Style themselves.

• Family Structure • Children who grow up with authoritarian


parents tend to obey rules much of the
• Parents’ Employment and Economic time.
Stress
• However, they tend to have lower self-
• Siblings and Birth Order esteem, be more discontented, withdrawn
and distrustful.
• Some of the children may also present to
be hostile.

2 5

Parenting Styles Parenting Styles


• Many research studies suggest that styles • Permissive / Indulgent Parenting
of parenting affect children’s • This parenting style emphasises self-
development. expression and self-regulation.
• There are four types of parenting styles • Parents make very few demands. If they
identified by psychologists: set rules they will rarely enforce them.
• Authoritarian Parenting They rarely ask their children to bear any
consequences when their children do
• Permissive / Indulgent Parenting
something wrong.
• Authoritative / Democratic Parenting
• They give their children lots of freedom.
• Neglectful / Uninvolved Parenting They allow their children to make choices
themselves and to monitor their own
activities as much as possible.

3 6

OU C&A Dev p.1


Parenting Styles Parenting Styles
• Permissive / Indulgent Parenting • Neglectful / Uninvolved Parenting
• Children who grow up with permissive • This is a parenting style that parents focus
parents tend to lack self-control. on their own needs and neglect their
• They tend to be unable to appreciate rules children’s needs.
and authority. They may have behavioural • Parents make very few demands.
problems in school.
• They are detached from their children and
are not responsive to their children’s
requests.

7 10

Parenting Styles Parenting Styles


• Authoritative / Democratic Parenting • Neglectful / Uninvolved Parenting
• This parenting style values a child’s • Children who grow up with neglectful
individuality but also stresses social authoritarian parents tend to have lower
constraints. self-esteem and lack self-control.
• Parents encourage their children to be • They tend to display more behavioural
independent but still place limits and problems and have lower academic
controls on their actions. achievement.
• They explain the reasoning behind their
stands and encourage verbal give-and-take.
• They enforce rules and require their children
to bear consequences for wrongdoings in a
gentle and positive way.

8 11

Parenting Styles Parenting Styles


• Authoritative / Democratic Parenting
• Children who grow up with authoritative Parental Control
parents tend to be self-reliant, self-
controlled and self-assertive.
High Low
• They tend to have healthy self-esteem.
• They are independent, but are willing to
seek help when needed. High
Parental
• They are more friendly, cooperative and Warmth
socially competent. Low

9 12

OU C&A Dev p.2


Parenting Styles Family Structure
• Children from divorced and remarried
families are likely to be less socially
Parental Control
responsible and competent, to think less
of themselves, and to have trouble
High Low relating to parents, siblings, and peers
(Hetherington et al., 1998).
High Authoritative Permissive
Parental
Warmth
Low Authoritarian Neglectful

13 16

Family Structure Family Structure


• Much research has found that children • Reasons might include:
tend to do better in traditional (intact) • Traditional (intact) families have not had to
families, those that include two biological deal with the stress and disruption caused
parents or two parents who adopted the by divorce or the death of a parent;
child in infancy (Papalia, Olds & Feldman, • There are greater financial, psychological,
2001). and time pressures on single parents;
• There is possible need to adjust to a new
household or to remarriage.

14 17

Family Structure Family Structure


• Much research has found that children • Parental separation has been reported as
tend to do better in families that include being associated with a wide range of
two biological parents or two parents who adverse effects on children’s wellbeing,
adopted the child in infancy (Papalia, Olds including adverse impacts on:
& Feldman, 2001). • cognitive capacity (Fergusson, Lynskey &
• Studies showed that children living with Horwood, 1994)
single or remarried mothers were more • schooling (Evans et al., 2001)
likely to have repeated a grade of school, • physical health (Dawson, 1991)
to have been expelled, to have health
• mental and emotional health (Chase-
problems, or to have been treated for Lansdale et al., 1995)
emotional or behavioural problems in the
previous year (Dawson, 1991).
15 18

OU C&A Dev p.3


Parents’ Employment and Economic
Family Structure Stress
• social conduct and behaviour (Morrison & • The economic stresses associated with
Coiro, 1999)
poverty have been found to have
• peer relations (Demo & Acock, 1988) multifaceted consequences for children’s
• criminal offending (Hanson, 1999) functioning that include:
• substance use (Fergusson, Horwood &
Lynskey, 1994) • stress neurobiology
• teenage pregnancy (Woodward et al., 2001) • poorer cognitive growth and educational
• Research studies suggested that, in the attainment
presence of other exacerbating factors, • behavioral and emotional problems
parental separation bears down heavily on • poorer health outcomes
children and blights their lives to a
significant degree across all domains of
functioning (Mackay, 2005).

19 22

Parents’ Employment and Economic Parents’ Employment and Economic


Stress Stress
• Parents who have poor working Early Impacts of Family Socioeconomic
conditions, such as long hours, overtime Status (SES) on Cognitive and Learning Skills
work, stressful work, and lack of High SES
Cumulative Vocabulary (Words)

1200

autonomy at work, are likely to be more


irritable at home. They are more likely to
engage in less effective parenting 600
Middle SES

(Crouter, 2006). Low SES

200

months
16 24 36

Child’s Age (Months) Source: Hart & Risley (1995)

20 23

Parents’ Employment and Economic


Stress Siblings and Birth Order
• Families suffering from economic • In non-industrialised societies, it is found
stresses may experience: that older girls are responsible to take
• housing instability care for their younger siblings. Parents
• lower school quality also train children early to teach younger
siblings how to help with the family work
• poor health care
such as gathering firewood and growing
• risky neighborhoods food (Cicirelli, 1994).
• Parents under economic stress may also • In industrialised societies, parents
experience emotional stress, which in turn generally try not to put too much burden
harm children’s development. on older children’s shoulders in taking
care of younger ones (Weisner, 1993)

21 24

OU C&A Dev p.4


Siblings and Birth Order Siblings and Birth Order
• Children’s development is influenced by • First-Born Children
their sibling relationships. • First-born children experience feelings
• Children usually experience the earliest, of loss when their parents have new
most frequent and most intense disputes babies and are not able to provide them
among siblings are over the rights to own with undivided attention anymore.
or to play with toys. • They may also be expected to set an
• Disputes among siblings can provide an example and be given responsibility for
opportunity for children to acquire skills younger siblings.
in conflict resolution.
• Children also experience competition with
their siblings in gaining parents’ attention.

25 28

Siblings and Birth Order Siblings and Birth Order


• Psychologist Alfred Adler suggested that • First-Born Children
birth order and the number of siblings • Adler argued that first-born children
affect a child’s personality development. would become intellectual,
• Adler contended that it is a common conscientious, helpful to adults and
fallacy to imagine that children of the dominant in social settings so as to get
same family are formed in the same back their parents’ love and attention.
environment. He believed that the psychic • Some first-born children may equate
situation of each child is individual and love with success.
differs from that of others because of the
• They may also feel that power is his/her
order of their succession.
right and become authoritarian or strict.

26 29

Siblings and Birth Order Siblings and Birth Order


• First-Born Children • Second-Born Children
• First-born children receive undivided • Second-born children grow up sharing
love and attention from their parents for the attention from their parents with the
a period of time. They are more likely to first-born siblings. Adler believed that,
develop a sense of security and self- the second-born children are more
confidence. likely to cooperate and they are usually
• Their inexperienced parents often have pacemakers.
very high expectations for them. They • Second-born children have a set
may feel very pressured to succeed. example from their first-born children to
They are prone to perfectionism and follow. Some second-born children
need for affirmation. would try to be the followers.

27 30

OU C&A Dev p.5


Siblings and Birth Order Siblings and Birth Order
• Second-Born Children • The Only (Single) Children
• However, since there is always • They do not have to share their parents'
someone who was there first, some attention. They tend to have higher self-
second-born children may try to esteem and feel more comfortable
overtake the first-born children. They around adults.
may grow to be more competitive and • They can be over-protected and spoiled.
rebellious. They may have a hard time when they
are told no, and school may be a
difficult transition as they are not the
sole focus of the teacher.
• On the other hand, the only children can
also be highly motivated and mature.

31 34

Siblings and Birth Order Siblings and Birth Order


• Middle-Born Children • Some studies on sibling relationships
• They may struggle with figuring out showed that negative changes were most
their place in the family. often described as happening when one
• They may experience their parents busy sibling was between 7 and 9 and
taking care of the eldest siblings and of completing the primary grades. Both
the youngest siblings. They may mothers and children often attributed
develop a feeling of being left out. these changes to outside friendships
• They are eager for parental praise and which led to jealousy and
thus tend to develop their gifts to competitiveness or loss of interest in, and
accomplish this goal. intimacy with, the siblings (Dunn, 1996).
• They tend to be very flexible and
diplomatic.

32 35

Siblings and Birth Order


Parents’
• Last-Born Children Employment
Parenting
• They tend to get more attention from and Economic
Style
their parents because they are never Stress
dethroned by another sibling.
Family
• They may possess positive traits of Influences
confidence, ability to have fun and Siblings
comfort at entertaining others. and Birth
Order
• However, they tend to be dependent and Family
may not be very considerate since they Structure
are always being taken care of by family
members.

33 36

OU C&A Dev p.6

You might also like