Geosyntec: Consultants

SEMS-RM DOCID # 100020043
1111 Broadway, 6th Floor

Geosyntec C> Oakland, California 94607
PH 510.836.3034
www.geosyntec.com
consultants
April 15, 2020
Ms. Alana Lee
EPA Region 9, Superfund Division
75 Hawthorne Street, SFD-7-3
San Francisco, California 94105
Subject: 2019 Annual Progress Report

501 Ellis Street, Mountain View, California
Dear Ms. Lee:

This letter transmits the subject report for 501 Ellis Street, Mountain View, California. This
report describes the work that was performed pursuant to Sections XV A&B of CERCLA §106
Order, EPA Docket No. 91-4, as amended on September 16, 2011, and Section 2.6.2 of the
Statement of Work for Remedial Design and Remedial Action to Address the Vapor Intrusion
Pathway. Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. prepared this report on behalf of Renesas Electronics
America, Inc. Hard copies of the subject report will be prepared and submitted once current San
Francisco Bay Area shelter-in-place requirements are lifted.
If you have any questions or comments, please call either of the undersigned at (510) 836-3034.
Sincerely,
Matt Bacon, P.G. (CA)

Project Geologist
Eric J. Suchomel, Ph.D., P.E. (CA)

Principal Engineer
Enclosure: 2019 Annual Progress Report

Copies to: MEW Distribution List (email)
Alana Lee, EPA Region 9 (1 copy, 2 CDs)
Candace Bowers, Mountain View Public Library (1 CD)
engineers I scientists I innovators

Geosyntec t>
consultants
engineers I scientists I innovators
2019 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

501 ELLIS STREET
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for
Renesas Electronics America, Inc.
1001 Murphy Ranch Road
Milpitas, California 95035
Prepared by
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
Oakland, California 94607
Project Number: WR2814
April 15, 2020

Geosyntec C>
consultants
2019 Annual Progress Report

501 Ellis Street
Mountain View, California
Prepared for
1001 Murphy Ranch Road
Milpitas, California 95035
Prepared by
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
Oakland, California 94607
Stamped 4/15/20
Matt Bacon, P.G. (CA) Eric Suchomel, Ph.D., P.E. (CA)

Project Geologist Principal Engineer
Project Number: WR2814
April 15, 2020

Geosyntec 0
consultants
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1
1.1 Site Background ..............................................................................................................1
1.2 Local Hydrogeology ........................................................................................................1
1.3 Summary of Remedial Actions .......................................................................................2
1.3.1 Soil.......................................................................................................................2
1.3.2 Groundwater ........................................................................................................2
1.3.3 Vapor Intrusion Pathway .....................................................................................3
1.4 Summary of 2019 Activities............................................................................................4
1.4.1 Field Activities ....................................................................................................4
1.4.2 Reporting Activities ............................................................................................4
2. GROUNDWATER REMEDY .................................................................................................5

2.1 SCGWR System Description ..........................................................................................5
2.2 SCGWR System Flow Rates and Mass Removal ...........................................................5
2.3 Hydraulic Control and Capture Zone Analysis ...............................................................5
2.3.1 Capture Zone Analysis Methods .........................................................................5
2.3.2 Estimated Capture Zones for 2019 ......................................................................7
2.3.3 Horizontal and Vertical Gradients .......................................................................7
2.4 Analytical Results............................................................................................................7
2.4.1 Analytical Results Summary ...............................................................................8
2.4.2 Data Quality Assurance Summary ......................................................................9
3. OTHER 2019 ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................................10
4. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED.............................................................................................11
5. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT – GROUNDWATER REMEDY ..........................................12
6. OPTIMIZATION PROGRESS ..............................................................................................13
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................14

7.1 Groundwater ..................................................................................................................14
7.2 Vapor Intrusion..............................................................................................................15
8. FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS .......................................................................................................16

8.1 Groundwater Remedy....................................................................................................16
8.2 Vapor Intrusion Remedy ...............................................................................................16
9. UPCOMING WORK IN 2020 AND PLANNED FUTURE ACTIVITIES ...........................17
2019 Annual Progress Report - 501 Ellis Street ii April 15, 2020
Geosyntec 0
consultants
10. REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................18
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: SCGWR System Performance Summary
Table 2: Summary of Extraction Well and Monitoring Well Construction Details
Table 3: Groundwater Levels – September 2019
Table 4: Analytical Results – 2018 Biennial Groundwater Monitoring Event
Table 5: Analytical Results – 2019 NEC-1AE Quarterly Sampling
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Site Layout
Figure 3: Groundwater Extracted and Mass of VOCs Removed
Figure 4: Groundwater Elevations in Selected Monitoring Wells
Figure 5: Groundwater Elevation Contour Map and Capture Zone – Third Quarter 2019
Figure 6: Simulated A Aquifer Capture Zone – First Quarter 2019
Figure 7: Simulated A Aquifer Capture Zone – Second Quarter 2019
Figure 8: Simulated A Aquifer Capture Zone – Third Quarter 2019
Figure 9: Simulated A Aquifer Capture Zone – Fourth Quarter 2019
Figure 10: TCE Concentration Contour Map – 2018 Biennial Groundwater Monitoring Event
Figure 11: VOC Concentrations in Groundwater
Figure 12: VOC Concentrations in Well NEC-1AE
Figure 13: TCE Concentration Trend Analysis
2019 Annual Progress Report - 501 Ellis Street iii April 15, 2020
Geosyntec 0
consultants
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: 2019 Annual Report Remedy Performance Checklist
Appendix B: Capture Zone Calculations
Appendix C: 2019 Laboratory Analytical Reports
Appendix D: Annual Quality Assurance Report
Appendix E: VOC Concentration Mann-Kendall Trend Analysis
Historical Data Included on CD (EPA Only)
2019 Annual Progress Report - 501 Ellis Street iv April 15, 2020
Geosyntec 0
consultants
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
µg/L micrograms per liter

106 Order Sections XV A&B of CERCLA §106 Order, EPA Docket No. 91-4, as
amended on 16 September 2011
Bechtel Bechtel Environmental, Inc.
bgs below ground surface
btoc below top of casing
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
cis-1,2-DCE cis-1,2-dichloroethene
COPCs chemicals of potential concern
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
ESD Explanation of Significant Differences
FFS focused feasibility study
ft/day feet per day
ft/ft feet per foot
ft2/day square feet per day
Geosyntec Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
gpd gallons per day
gpm gallons per minute
Haley & Aldrich Haley & Aldrich, Inc.
Iris Iris Environmental
Locus Locus Technologies
MCL Maximum Contaminant Level
MEW Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman
mg/kg milligrams per kilogram
NEC NEC Electronics America, Inc.
O&M operations and maintenance
PRCC Periodic Report of Continued Compliance
Renesas Renesas Electronics America, Inc.
Report Annual Progress Report
RGRP regional groundwater remediation program
2019 Annual Progress Report - 501 Ellis Street v April 15, 2020
Geosyntec 0
consultants
ROD Record of Decision

RPDs relative percent differences
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
RWQCP Regional Water Quality Control Plant
SCGWR Source Control Groundwater Remediation
TCE trichloroethene
TDS total dissolved solids
the Site 501 Ellis Street, Mountain View, California
VOCs volatile organic compounds
Weiss Weiss Associates
2019 Annual Progress Report - 501 Ellis Street vi April 15, 2020
Geosyntec 0
consultants
1. INTRODUCTION
This Annual Progress Report (Report) summarizes facility-specific environmental work and
related activities that were performed at 501 Ellis Street, Mountain View, California (the Site)
during the period of January 1 through December 31, 2019. The work described in this Report
was performed pursuant to Sections XV A&B of Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) §106 Order, United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Docket No. 91-4, as amended on September 16, 2011 (106 Order)
(EPA, 1990a; 2011). Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec) prepared this Report on behalf of
Renesas Electronics America, Inc. (Renesas) in accordance with the EPA May 6, 2005, email
correspondence prescribing 2004 and future Annual Progress Report contents (EPA, 2005). The
2019 Annual Report Remedy Performance Checklist is included as Appendix A. In addition,
this Report includes the annual progress reporting requirements prescribed in Section 2.6.2 of the
Statement of Work for Remedial Design and Remedial Action to Address the Vapor Intrusion
Pathway included in the amended 106 Order (EPA, 2011).
1.1 Site Background
The Site is located at 501 Ellis Street, Mountain View, California, and lies within the area
bounded by Middlefield Road, Ellis Street, Whisman Road, and United States Highway 101 in
Mountain View, California (Figure 1). This area includes historical locations of semiconductor
manufacturing and other industrial activities, including the Site. In 1985, the EPA identified this
area as the Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman (MEW) Superfund Study Area. Numerous investigations
at the properties within the MEW Study Area have been conducted, and extensive soil and
groundwater remedial activities have been implemented and are ongoing at many of the
properties.
The Site is approximately 2 acres in size. A single-story building, constructed in 1967, occupies
about 28,000 square feet of the western portion of the property, and a paved parking area
occupies the eastern portion of the property (Figure 2). From 1968 to 1978, Electronic Arrays
Corporation operated at the Site and manufactured semiconductor devices and related
components. Solvents and other chemicals were used in the manufacturing process. From 1978
until April 1984, NEC Electronics America, Inc. (NEC) operated at the Site. The 501 Ellis Street
building is currently used for office and meeting space.
In 1982, NEC initiated a groundwater monitoring and soil sampling program at the Site in
response to a California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) investigation of all
companies that used underground chemical tanks in their production processes prior to January
1, 1975. Between 1982 and 1990, NEC completed several Site investigations that identified the
presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), in particular trichloroethene (TCE), in the soil
and groundwater beneath the Site. Soil and groundwater remedial actions were implemented in
the 1990s, and groundwater remedial actions are ongoing (Section 1.3).
1.2 Local Hydrogeology
The Site is located on a relatively flat tract of land that slopes gently to the north towards San
Francisco Bay, located approximately 2 miles away.
2019 Annual Progress Report - 501 Ellis Street 1 April 15, 2020
Geosyntec 0
consultants
Sediments beneath the Site are composed of varying proportions of unconsolidated to poorly
consolidated gravel, sand, silt, and clay typical of alluvial, estuarine, and bay deposits. The
interbedded materials are generally lenticular, laterally gradational, and heterogeneous (Bechtel
Environmental, Inc. [Bechtel], 1996).
Water-bearing materials beneath the Site and the larger MEW Study Area are divided into an
upper aquifer zone, comprised of the A and B aquifers and their associated aquitards, and a lower
aquifer zone, comprised of the C and deeper aquifers and their associated aquitards (Geosyntec,
2014). The A aquifer at the Site is approximately 15 to 20 feet thick, extending from a depth of
about 10 feet below ground surface (bgs) to a maximum depth of about 30 feet bgs. Based on
geologic logs prepared during the drilling of Site wells, the A aquifer is composed of silty sand,
sand, and gravel, with interbedded layers of silty clay, silt, and gravelly silt.
1.3 Summary of Remedial Actions
Remedial actions at the Site have reduced soil concentrations of TCE to below cleanup levels
specified in the MEW Study Area Record of Decision (ROD) and two associated Explanations of
Significant Differences (ESDs) (EPA, 1989; 1990b; 1996) and continue to control and reduce the
concentrations of VOCs in groundwater. Investigation and remediation efforts at the Site have
been documented in several reports (e.g., Bechtel, 1992; 1996) and are periodically updated in
progress reports to EPA, as required by the 106 Order (EPA, 2011).
1.3.1 Soil
On September 6, 1991, NEC submitted a proposed final remedial design for treating VOCs in
unsaturated soils located east of the Site building. Applicable treatment technologies for shallow
unsaturated soils at the MEW Study Area are specified in the ROD and consist of soil removal
and aeration or soil vapor extraction. NEC elected to excavate and send unsaturated soils with
TCE concentrations greater than the cleanup level of 0.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) offsite
for treatment and disposal. Soil excavations are complete, and NEC received EPA approval of
the soil investigations and remediation at the Site in 1995 (EPA, 2004).
1.3.2 Groundwater
In October 1997, NEC began operating the Source Control Groundwater Remediation (SCGWR)
system at the Site. The SCGWR system is a groundwater extraction and treatment system
designed to control, contain, and extract VOCs at the Site and to complement the regional
groundwater remediation program (RGRP) for the MEW Study Area. The SCGWR system has
been operated continuously (i.e., shut down only for routine and non-routine maintenance) since
startup in October 1997.
As originally designed, the SCGWR system extracted groundwater from the A aquifer at the Site
for treatment with granular activated carbon prior to discharge to the storm drain. On September
3, 2008, Geosyntec submitted an Optimization Evaluation for the SCGWR system on behalf of
NEC (Geosyntec, 2008). The Optimization Evaluation recommended the following
modifications to the SCGRW system:
Geosyntec 0
consultants
• Adjust the groundwater extraction rates. Based on an evaluation of SCGWR system

performance, the following modifications to groundwater extraction were
recommended to improve cost-effectiveness while maintaining groundwater capture:
 Discontinue groundwater extraction from NEC-1AE (Figure 2). The pump in
NEC-1AE would remain in the well should extraction need to be resumed.
 Continue operation of NEC-27AE and NEC-28AE at approximate extraction rates
of 2.0 gallons per minute (gpm) per well or higher. If a 2.0 gpm extraction rate
could not be maintained at well NEC-28AE, then extraction from NEC-1AE at
low rates could be resumed if necessary to maintain groundwater capture.
 Monitor the direction and magnitude of the regional groundwater gradient for
changes that might affect groundwater capture at the Site.
• Evaluate the possibility of direct discharge of extracted groundwater to the Palo Alto
Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP).
During a November 3, 2008, meeting between EPA and Geosyntec, EPA concurred with these
recommendations, provided that:
1. Contingencies were given for restart of NEC-1AE if groundwater capture became
inadequate; and
2. A monitoring program for evaluating groundwater capture was implemented.
A plan for implementing the Optimization Evaluation recommendations and addressing EPA
comments was provided in the 2008 Annual Progress Report for the Site (Geosyntec, 2009). The
Optimization Evaluation recommendations were implemented in 2009 and the SCGWR system
has operated in the optimized configuration since that time. Operation of the optimized SCGWR
system includes direct discharge of extracted groundwater to the Palo Alto RWQCP in
accordance with City of Mountain View Wastewater Discharge Permit ID Number 925.
1.3.3 Vapor Intrusion Pathway
In 2012, the potential for vapor intrusion at the 501 Ellis Street building was evaluated, including
collection of indoor air, outdoor air, and sub-slab vapor samples (Geosyntec, 2012). The
sampling results indicated that concentrations of VOCs in indoor air were below cleanup levels
specified in the MEW Study Area ROD Amendment for the Vapor Intrusion Pathway (EPA,
2010) but were greater than outdoor air concentrations. Based on these findings, a preliminary
recommendation was made that the building at 501 Ellis Street be categorized as Tier 3A, which
would require long-term indoor air monitoring and institutional controls.
Tenant improvement construction work was subsequently completed inside the 501 Ellis Street
building in 2014. The construction work included temporarily opening the building slab,
trenching for the installation of sub slab utilities, slab repair, and sealing of potential conduits
that could act as preferential pathways for vapor intrusion. Indoor and outdoor air sampling was
conducted by Iris Environmental (Iris) prior to and following the tenant improvement
construction activities. MEW Study Area chemicals of potential concern (COPCs) were not
Geosyntec 0
consultants
detected in indoor air samples collected following construction, except for Freon 113, which was
detected at comparable concentrations in outdoor air (Iris, 2015).
The results from the samples collected by Iris indicate that a Tier 3B categorization, which is
limited to implementation of institutional controls, is appropriate for the 501 Ellis Street building
with completion of the 2014 tenant improvement activities. A final determination of the vapor
intrusion response action tier for the Site will be made following EPA approval of the Revised
Site-Wide Vapor Intrusion Sampling and Analysis Work Plan for Response Action Tiering
(Haley & Aldrich, Inc. [Haley & Aldrich], 2013).
1.4 Summary of 2019 Activities
The following section summarizes field and reporting activities that were completed for the Site
in 2019.
1.4.1 Field Activities
• February 12. Locus Technologies (Locus) replaced the submersible pump at NEC-
27AE.
• March 4, June 20, September 11, and December 10. Locus performed quarterly
operation and maintenance (O&M) for the SCGWR system. As part of each O&M
event, a sample was collected from the SCGWR system effluent as required by the
City of Mountain View Wastewater Discharge Permit and from well NEC-1AE as
specified in the revised SCGWR extraction and monitoring program (Geosyntec,
2009). The system effluent samples were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 624
and total dissolved solids (TDS) by Method SM 2540C. The NEC-1AE samples were
analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260B.
• September 19. Annual groundwater levels were measured in Site monitoring wells.
1.4.2 Reporting Activities

• January 3. The semi-annual Periodic Report of Continued Compliance (PRCC)
summarizing the results of SCGWR system self-monitoring during the second half of
2018 was submitted to the City of Mountain View.
• April 15. The 2018 Annual Progress Report for the Site was submitted to EPA.
• August 8. The semi-annual PRCC summarizing the results of SCGWR system self-
monitoring during the first half of 2019 was submitted to the City of Mountain View.
Geosyntec 0
consultants
2. GROUNDWATER REMEDY
The following sections present a summary of 2019 O&M activities, results of a hydraulic control
and capture zone analysis for the SCGWR system, and results from the most recent groundwater
sampling at the Site.
2.1 SCGWR System Description
The SCGWR system is a groundwater extraction and treatment system designed to control,
contain, and extract VOCs from the A aquifer at the Site and to complement the MEW Study
Area RGRP extraction program. The SCGWR system has operated since October 1997. On May
13, 2009, the modifications to the SCGRW system recommended in the 2008 Optimization
Evaluation (Section 1.3) were completed. These modifications included adjustments to
groundwater extraction rates and converting the system to directly discharge untreated
groundwater to the sanitary sewer for treatment at the Palo Alto RWQCP under a City of
Mountain View wastewater discharge permit.
2.2 SCGWR System Flow Rates and Mass Removal
Performance of the SCGWR system, including average flow rates, extraction totals, and
calculated VOC mass removal is summarized in Table 1. The data was collected monthly
through 2009 and quarterly since. As of December 30, 2019, approximately 49,950,000 gallons
of groundwater had been extracted since startup of the SCGWR system. The average daily
processing rate since startup is 6,435 gallons per day (gpd), or 4.47 gpm. Since system
optimization in 2009, the average daily processing rate has been 3.94 gpm, with an average 2019
daily processing rate of 4.05 gpm.
Approximately 1.6 pounds of VOCs were removed by the SCGWR system in 2019. The total
mass of VOCs removed by the treatment system since startup is approximately 57 pounds.
Figure 3 shows the cumulative volume of groundwater extracted and mass of VOCs removed
since system startup.
2.3 Hydraulic Control and Capture Zone Analysis
Site monitoring and extraction wells are completed within the A aquifer (Table 2). Depth to
groundwater ranged from 6.62 to 21.45 feet below top of casing (btoc) during the September
2019 gauging event (Table 3). A hydrograph of groundwater elevations in selected monitoring
wells across the Site is shown in Figure 4.
2.3.1 Capture Zone Analysis Methods
Capture of groundwater beneath the Site was estimated using two methods.
Javandel and Tsang Method. The first method is the analytical solution of Javandel and Tsang
(1987), which consists of calculating a stagnation point and capture zone width, followed by
projection of streamlines perpendicular to groundwater elevation contours. The 2019 capture
zone calculations using this approach are provided in Appendix B.
Numerical Modeling Method. The second method for estimating groundwater capture uses a
steady-state numerical simulation of groundwater flow incorporating particle tracking.
Geosyntec 0
consultants
Numerical simulations were performed using Visual MODFLOW Professional, Version

2011.1®.
The SCGWR system is designed to provide complete containment of A aquifer groundwater
underlying the Site. The numerical model treats the interlayered heterogeneities of the A aquifer
as a single unit extending from 10 to 30 feet bgs. The unit is assumed to have a uniform
transmissivity of 91.3 square feet per day (ft2/day), estimated from pumping tests conducted on
wells NEC-12A, NEC-22A, and NEC-25A during groundwater extraction system design
(Bechtel, 1996; Geosyntec, 2001) and confirmed based on an analysis of the specific capacity of
the extraction wells (Driscoll, 1986). The transmissivity was incorporated into the numerical
model using an assumed uniform aquifer thickness of 20 feet, resulting in a hydraulic
conductivity of 4.6 feet per day (ft/day). This value is consistent with the average hydraulic
conductivity of 2.3 ft/day estimated from slug tests conducted near the Site (Bechtel, 1989). The
value is also within the range of reported regional A aquifer hydraulic conductivities across the
MEW Study Area (0.35 ft/day to 2,050 ft/day), although it should be noted that the regional data
suggests the A aquifer is highly heterogeneous and flow through the aquifer can vary
considerably.
For the Site numerical model, a uniform horizontal gradient with a direction of N28W and
magnitude of 0.008 feet per foot (ft/ft) is assumed for the A aquifer groundwater beneath the
Site. The horizontal gradient was estimated based on offsite groundwater elevations and regional
potentiometric surface maps developed for the MEW Study Area (Weiss Associates [Weiss],
2004), and is consistent with historical estimates (Bechtel, 1989; 1996). The observed
groundwater gradient direction beneath the Site does not appear to be uniform based on
groundwater elevations in Site monitoring wells, however. Due to the position of the Site within
and relative to the MEW Study Area and the presence of active groundwater extraction systems
onsite and to the west of the Site, the gradient appears to shift locally to the west in the
downgradient (northern and northwestern) portions of the Site.
For the Site numerical model, it is also assumed that there is no contribution of groundwater
from the underlying B1 aquifer into the A aquifer. This assumption is consistent with
observations from B1 aquifer wells that showed no response when monitored during onsite
pumping tests conducted in the A aquifer (Bechtel, 1996).
The model domain is 2,500 feet wide by 2,500 feet long, with 20 feet by 20 feet grid blocks. The
numerical simulation has one vertical layer with a 30-foot thickness. The upper 10 feet of the
vertical layer is unsaturated. The upper and lower boundaries of the vertical layer are sloped in a
direction consistent with the groundwater gradient to maintain a uniform aquifer thickness.
While there are many groundwater extraction wells currently operating within the MEW Study
Area, only the extraction rates and elevation data within the immediate vicinity of the Site are
used to evaluate groundwater capture.
Other Analysis Methods. Other techniques commonly used to evaluate the performance of
groundwater extraction systems, such as tracer tests and contaminant concentration trends in up-
and downgradient monitoring wells, are not applicable at the Site due to its position relative to
the MEW Study Area regional plume and contributions of contaminants to groundwater from
upgradient offsite sources.
Geosyntec 0
consultants
2.3.2 Estimated Capture Zones for 2019

Based on the A aquifer thickness of 20 feet and bulk hydraulic conductivity of 4.6 ft/day, the
coupled analytical solution using the Javandel and Tsang method and potentiometric surface
evaluation show capture of the A aquifer groundwater beneath most of the Site in September
2019 (Figure 5). Capture may be potentially incomplete in the northeastern portion of the Site
near monitoring well NEC-12A. However, concentrations of TCE in that portion of the Site are
below the California Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) and MEW Study Area cleanup
objective of 5 micrograms per liter (µg/L) (see Section 2.4 for additional discussion).
Particle path lines showing simulated groundwater capture in the A aquifer beneath the Site
based on average groundwater extraction rates for each quarter of 2019 are shown in Figure 6
through Figure 9. The groundwater capture zones predicted by the numerical solution are in
generally good agreement with the groundwater capture zones developed based on observed
water levels in Site monitoring wells and the Javandel and Tsang method. The numerically
simulated capture zones demonstrate nearly complete capture of the A aquifer groundwater
beneath the Site. The only identified area of potentially incomplete capture is the northeastern
corner of the Site (near NEC-12A), where TCE concentrations are below the MEW Study Area
cleanup objective of 5 µg/L.
2.3.3 Horizontal and Vertical Gradients
The groundwater elevation contour map for September 2019 (Figure 5) indicates that
groundwater flow at the Site is generally to the north-northwest, in the direction of the operating
groundwater extraction wells NEC-27AE and NEC-28AE. The groundwater elevation contours
steepen around these wells, where groundwater pumping results in cones of depression.
The current Site monitoring network is limited to A aquifer monitoring wells. Depth to
groundwater measurements are only collected for the A aquifer at the Site and vertical gradients
between deeper groundwater zones are not evaluated.
2.4 Analytical Results
In March 2016, EPA conditionally approved the Request for Reduction in Groundwater
Monitoring Frequency, allowing a trial reduction in sampling frequency from annual to biennial
(Geosyntec, 2015; EPA, 2016). Biennial sampling of the Site wells was last conducted in the
third quarter of 2018. Consistent with EPA's conditional approval, Site wells were not sampled
in 2019. The next groundwater sampling event will occur in the third quarter of 2020.
VOC analytical results from the 2018 biennial sampling event are summarized in Table 4. TCE
isoconcentration contours for the 2018 groundwater sampling event are shown in Figure 10.
Time-series concentration plots of TCE and its reductive dechlorination daughter products cis-
1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE) and vinyl chloride for selected Site wells are provided in
Figure 11.
As part of the optimized SCGWR extraction and monitoring program, quarterly groundwater
sampling of NEC-1AE began after extraction from the well ceased in May 2009 and continued
through 2019. Results of the 2019 quarterly groundwater sampling at NEC-1AE are summarized
Geosyntec 0
consultants
in Table 5. A time-series concentration plot of selected VOCs in well NEC-1AE is provided in

Figure 12.
Laboratory analytical reports for samples collected in 2019 are included in Appendix C. A
summary of historical groundwater analytical results is included on the disc accompanying this
Report (Appendix C and historical data are provided to EPA only). The Annual Quality
Assurance Report for data collected during 2019 is provided in Appendix D, and quality control
results are summarized in Tables D-1, D-2, and D-3.
2.4.1 Analytical Results Summary
During the October 2018 biennial sampling event, seven chlorinated VOCs were detected in one
or more Site monitoring wells. TCE was detected in all the wells that are sampled at the Site,
except for well NEC-20A, which did not contain VOCs above analytical method detection limits.
The highest TCE concentration detected in 2018 was 83 µg/L in monitoring well NEC-8A.
The highest TCE concentrations at the Site have historically been detected in groundwater
samples collected from monitoring well NEC-1A (Figure 11). Prior to SCGWR system startup,
TCE concentrations in NEC-1A exceeded 1,000 µg/L. TCE concentrations in NEC-1A have
decreased substantially since SCGWR system startup, with a detected concentration of just 23
µg/L in October 2018.
As part of the optimized SCGWR extraction and monitoring program, quarterly groundwater
sampling of NEC-1AE began after extraction from the well ceased in May 2009. Once pumping
ceased in NEC-1AE in May 2009, concentrations of TCE immediately decreased from 150 µg/L
to 57 µg/L and have continued to gradually decline over time (Figure 12). The TCE
concentration of 20 µg/L observed in December 2019 represents the lowest concentration
observed at the well to date. Concentrations of cis 1,2-DCE at NEC-1AE following shutdown
increased to a peak of 65 µg/L in March 2016. Concentrations of cis-1,2-DCE have since
decreased to below 30 µg/L (Table 5). cis-1-2-DCE is a reductive dechlorination daughter
product of TCE, and the observation that cis-1-2-DCE concentrations are stable or increasing
relative to long-term TCE concentrations suggests that ongoing natural attenuation processes
near NEC-1AE are occurring with increased efficacy in the absence of groundwater extraction.
TCE and cis-1,2-DCE concentration trends at all Site wells were evaluated using Mann-Kendall
trend analysis, a non-parametric trend test that uses only the relative magnitudes of the data
rather than their measured values to evaluate trends. Non-detect results are included in the Mann-
Kendall trend analysis at the analytical method reporting limit. TCE and cis-1,2-DCE
concentration trends at the 90% confidence level based on samples collected since 2008 are
summarized in Table E-1 of Appendix E. Appendix E also includes a summary worksheet of
the Mann-Kendall analysis conducted for each well.
Of the 20 monitoring and extraction wells at the Site, 15 exhibited decreasing TCE concentration
trends, two exhibited increasing TCE concentration trends, and three did not demonstrate a TCE
concentration trend at a 90% confidence level (Figure 13). The wells with increasing trends are
NEC-PZ-1A and NEC-PZ-2A, which are located near the downgradient groundwater extraction
wells NEC-27AE and NEC-28AE. The increasing statistical trends in TCE concentration at these
wells are likely related to capture of upgradient groundwater with higher TCE concentrations.
Geosyntec 0
consultants
In addition to the decreasing TCE concentration trends, seven wells at the Site show increasing
cis-1,2-DCE concentration trends (Appendix E), which indicates that natural attenuation
processes at the Site are resulting in the reductive dechlorination of TCE.
2.4.2 Data Quality Assurance Summary
Quality control results for samples collected in 2019 are summarized in Appendix D.
• Percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) for laboratory control
spikes were within project goals (Table D-1).
• VOCs were not detected in trip or laboratory blanks (Table D-2).
• During the first quarter 2019 O&M event, a duplicate sample was collected at
monitoring well NEC-1AE. The average of the RPD values for analytes detected in
the primary and duplicate samples was 10.2%, which is well below the project RPD
goal of less than 35% (Table D-3).
Geosyntec 0
consultants
3. OTHER 2019 ACTIVITIES

On June 12, 2019, Renesas participated in a MEW All Parties meeting. At the meeting, EPA
presented status updates on their planned focused feasibility study (FFS) for shallow
groundwater and the fourth five-year review.
Geosyntec 0
consultants
4. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED
The extraction rate at NEC-27AE was below the target pumping rate of 2 gpm in January and
February 2019. In response, the submersible pump in the well was replaced on February 12,
2019, and the extraction rate increased to approximately 2 gpm. During the fourth quarter 2019,
the pumping rate at NEC-27AE decreased to a rate of 1.74 gpm in December of 2019. In
response, NEC-27AE and its associated conveyance pipeline will be chemically treated in early
2020.
No additional problems related to operation of the SCGWR system were encountered in 2019.
Geosyntec 0
consultants
5. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT – GROUNDWATER REMEDY

Is the remedy functioning as intended? Yes, the SCGWR system is effectively extracting and
containing contaminated groundwater at the Site.
Are capture zones adequate? Converging lines of evidence indicate the capture zones at the Site
are adequate for maintaining capture of A aquifer groundwater with TCE concentrations
exceeding the MEW Study Area cleanup objective. The capture zone was estimated in
September 2019 (corresponding to the annual groundwater gauging event) using the Javandel
and Tsang method (Figure 5) and quarterly using a Site-specific numerical simulation (Figure 6
through Figure 9). The capture zones show nearly complete capture of the A aquifer
groundwater beneath the Site. Areas with potentially incomplete capture are limited to the
northeastern portion of the Site, where TCE concentrations are below the MEW Study Area
Are vertical gradients appropriate? Not applicable to the Site.
Are VOC concentrations decreasing over time? Yes, concentrations are decreasing over time. As
shown in Figure 11, TCE concentrations in monitoring well NEC-1A, which has historically had
the highest TCE concentrations at the Site, have decreased from a maximum reported
concentration of 2,400 µg/L in November 1991 to 23 µg/L during the most recent groundwater
monitoring event in October 2018. Mann-Kendall trend analysis of Site monitoring and
extraction wells indicate statistically significant decreasing TCE concentration trends at most
wells (Figure 13, Appendix E). The two wells exhibiting increasing TCE concentration trends
(NEC-PZ-1A and NEC-PZ-2A) are located near the downgradient extraction wells and are likely
influenced by capture of upgradient groundwater with higher TCE concentrations.
Geosyntec 0
consultants
6. OPTIMIZATION PROGRESS
As described in Section 1.3, Renesas has implemented the groundwater remedy optimizations
recommended in the Optimization Evaluation for 501 Ellis Street (Geosyntec, 2008).
Geosyntec 0
consultants
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The following section presents conclusions and recommendations for the groundwater and vapor
intrusion remedies.
7.1 Groundwater
The SCGWR system removed 1.6 pounds of VOCs in 2019. Groundwater extraction at NEC-
27AE and NEC-28AE was generally maintained at the target rate of 2 gpm per well throughout
2019, with supplemental system maintenance performed in response to decreasing rates. No
additional problems related to system operation were noted in 2019.
Converging lines of evidence indicate the groundwater capture zones are adequate for the A
aquifer at the Site. A capture zone coinciding with annual groundwater gauging was estimated
using the Javandel and Tsang method. Capture zones were also estimated quarterly based on
groundwater extraction rates using a Site-specific numerical simulation. The numerical
simulation results were in good agreement with the capture zone estimated from depth to
groundwater measurements, and both methods show nearly complete capture of the A aquifer
groundwater beneath the Site. The area with potentially incomplete capture was limited to the
northeastern corner of the Site, where TCE concentrations are below the MEW Study Area
Concentrations of TCE in the Site monitoring wells have decreased since startup of the SCGWR
system. In monitoring well NEC-1A, which has historically had the highest TCE concentrations,
the concentration has decreased from a reported maximum concentration of 2,400 µg/L in
November 1991 to 23 µg/L in October 2018. Trend analyses indicate stable or decreasing TCE
concentrations in all Site wells, except for two wells (NEC-PZ-1A and NEC-PZ-2A) that are
located near the downgradient extraction wells and are likely impacted by capture of upgradient
contamination.
The modifications to the SCGWR system recommended in the 2008 Optimization Evaluation
and implemented in May 2009 have not adversely impacted the groundwater remedy
performance. TCE concentration rebound has not been observed at extraction well NEC-1AE
since it was shut down as part of the May 2009 optimization activities, and cis-1,2-DCE
concentration trends indicate that ongoing natural attenuation processes near the well are
occurring with increased efficacy in the absence of groundwater extraction (Table 5, Figure 12).
Based on performance of the current remedy, continued implementation of the optimized remedy
is recommended, with the following modifications that will be implemented in 2020:
• The frequency of evaluating groundwater capture using the Site-specific numerical
model will be reduced to an annual basis. The evaluation will occur in the third
quarter to coincide with the annual groundwater gauging event for the MEW Study
Area.
• The frequency of monitoring at NEC-1AE will be reduced to a biennial schedule
matching the rest of the Site monitoring wells.
Geosyntec 0
consultants
7.2 Vapor Intrusion

Tenant improvement construction work was completed inside the 501 Ellis Street building in
2014. Iris conducted indoor and outdoor air sampling prior to and following the tenant
improvement construction activities. MEW Study Area COPCs were not detected in indoor air
samples collected following construction, except for Freon 113, which was detected at
comparable concentrations in outdoor air (Iris, 2015). These results indicate that a Tier 3B
categorization, which is limited to implementation of institutional controls, is appropriate for the
501 Ellis Street building.
Additional indoor air sampling is recommended to determine the final response action tiering for
the 501 Ellis Street building. Additional indoor air sampling, a final determination of the vapor
intrusion response action tier for the Site, and implementation of response actions based on the
final placement of the Site into a tier will be completed following EPA approval of the Revised
Site-Wide Vapor Intrusion Sampling and Analysis Work Plan for Response Action Tiering
(Haley & Aldrich, 2013).
Geosyntec 0
consultants
8. FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS
8.1 Groundwater Remedy

Renesas will continue implementation of the optimized remedy and groundwater monitoring
program, with the modifications described in Section 7.
8.2 Vapor Intrusion Remedy
Following approval of the Revised Site-Wide Vapor Intrusion Sampling and Analysis Work Plan
for Response Action Tiering (Haley & Aldrich, 2013), Renesas will implement the vapor
intrusion remedy for the Site.
Geosyntec 0
consultants
9. UPCOMING WORK IN 2020 AND PLANNED FUTURE

ACTIVITIES
Planned activities for 2020 related to the routine SCGWR system O&M and groundwater
monitoring are as follows:
• Routine SCGWR O&M
January • Submit the semi-annual PRCC summarizing the results of SCGWR
system self-monitoring during the second half of 2019
February • Routine SCGWR O&M
• Non-routine maintenance of NEC-27AE to enhance well yield
March • Routine SCGWR O&M
• Quarterly SCGWR system effluent sampling
April • Routine SCGWR O&M
• Submit 2019 Annual Progress Report to EPA
May • Routine SCGWR O&M
June • Routine SCGWR O&M
July • Routine SCGWR O&M
• Submit the semi-annual PRCC summarizing the results of SCGWR
system self-monitoring during the first half of 2020
August • Routine SCGWR O&M
September • Routine SCGWR O&M
• Annual groundwater gauging
October • Routine SCGWR O&M
• Biennial groundwater monitoring
November • Routine SCGWR O&M
December • Routine SCGWR O&M
Geosyntec 0
consultants
10. REFERENCES
Bechtel Environmental, Inc. (Bechtel). 1989. Phase III Hydrogeologic Investigation, Field
Documentation Report. September.
Bechtel. 1992. Soil Remediation Report for 501 Ellis Street, Mountain View. March.
Bechtel. 1996. Source Control Groundwater Remediation Final Design, 501 Ellis Street,
Mountain View. 26 August.
Driscoll. 1986. Groundwater and Wells, Second Ed. published by Johnson Division, St. Paul,
Minnesota.
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec). 2001. Evaluation of Extraction Well NEC-22AE. 31
August.
Geosyntec. 2008. Optimization Evaluation, 501 Ellis Street, Source Control Groundwater
Remediation System, Mountain View, California. 3 September.
Geosyntec. 2009. 2008 Annual Progress Report, NEC Electronics America, Inc. 501 Ellis Street,
Mountain View, California. 15 April.
Geosyntec. 2012. Results of Summer 2012 Investigation of Potential Vapor Intrusion Pathway
and Response Action Work Plan. 21 December.
Geosyntec. 2014. 2013 Annual Progress Report, Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman Regional
Groundwater Remediation Program, Mountain View, California. 15 April.
Geosyntec, 2015. “Request for Reduction in Groundwater Monitoring Frequency, Middlefield-
Ellis-Whisman Study Area, Mountain View, California.” February 13.
Haley & Aldrich, Inc. 2013. Revised Site-Wide Vapor Intrusion Sampling and Analysis Work
Plan for Response Action Tiering, Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman Superfund Area, Mountain
View, California and Moffett Field. 22 March.
Iris Environmental (Iris). 2015. Summary Report of Soil Management Plan Implementation for
Subsurface Improvement Activities Conducted at 501 and 515 Ellis Street, Mountain View.
12 March.
Javandel, I., and C.F. Tsang. 1987. “Capture-Zone Type Curves: A Tool for Aquifer Cleanup.”
Ground Water, 24(5), 616-625.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1989. Record of Decision, Fairchild,
Intel, and Raytheon Sites, Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman Study Area, Mountain View,
California, Superfund Records Center Document No. 2807-02332. 9 June.
EPA. 1990a. Administrative Order for Remedial Design and Remedial Action, U.S. EPA Docket
No. 91-4. 29 November.
EPA. 1990b. EPA Superfund Explanation of Significant Differences: Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman
Study Area, Mountain View, California. 1 September.
Geosyntec 0
consultants
EPA. 1996. EPA Superfund Explanation of Significant Differences: Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman

Study Area, Mountain View, California. 16 April.
EPA. 2004. Final First Five-Year Review Report for Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman (MEW)
Superfund Study Area, Mountain View, California. September.
EPA. 2005. Email from Ms. Alana Lee regarding the Change in Progress Reporting Frequency
and 2004 Annual Report Comments. 6 May.
EPA. 2010. Record of Decision Amendment for the Vapor Intrusion Pathway, Middlefield-Ellis-
Whisman (MEW) Study Area, Mountain View, California. 16 August.
EPA. 2011. Amendment 91-4A to MEW Administrative Order for Vapor Intrusion Remedial
Design and Remedial Action. 16 September.
EPA, 2016. “EPA Conditional Approval – Trial Reduction of Groundwater Monitoring
Frequency, Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman (MEW) Superfund Area, Mountain View and
Moffett Field, California.” 16 March.
Weiss Associates (Weiss). 2004. Draft A/A1 Aquifer (South) Groundwater Elevations and
Estimated Capture Zones. 18 November.
TABLES
2019 Annual Progress Report - 501 Ellis Street

Table 1 Geosyntec Consultants
SCGWR System Performance Summary

Discharge Discharge Total Discharge Average Rate Influent VOCs Effluent VOCs VOCs Removed
Period (days) (gallons) (gpd) (µg/L) (µg/L) (lbs)
Startup Oct 16, 1997 0 0 NA NA NA 0.00
Oct 16- Nov 13, 1997 27 109,340 4,050 152 0 0.14
Nov 14- Dec 17, 1997 34 153,010 4,500 202 0 0.26
Dec 18, 1997-Jan 15, 1998 29 152,110 5,245 134 0 0.17
Jan 16-Feb 19, 1998 35 194,870 5,568 138.1 0 0.22
Feb 20-Mar 19, 1998 28 149,510 5,340 144 1.4 0.18
Mar 20-Apr 22, 1998 34 157,430 4,630 137.4 0 0.18
Apr 23-May 28, 1998 36 104,370 2,899 69.9 0 0.06
May 29-June 23, 1998 25 95,110 3,804 110 15.28 0.08
June 24-July 22, 1998 29 145,370 5,013 83 0 0.10
July 23-Aug 20, 1998 29 118,290 4,107 60.8 0 0.06
Aug 21-Sep 23, 1998 34 129,190 3,791 196.6 1.1 0.21
Sep 24-Oct 28, 1998 35 277,800 7,919 125.3 0 0.29
Oct 29-Nov 30, 1998 32 283,740 8,890 110 0 0.26
Dec 1-Dec 15, 1998 15 120,120 7,959 146.2 0 0.15
Dec 16, 1998 - Jan 27, 1999 42 326,540 7,777 168.7 0 0.46
Jan 28 - Feb 24, 1999 27 233,490 8,721 167.9 0 0.33
Feb 25 - Mar 24, 1999 27 242,060 8,956 195 0 0.39
Mar 25 - Apr 28, 1999 35 289,730 8,253 159.4 0 0.39
Apr 21 - May 26, 1999 30 237,970 7,953 202.1 0 0.40
May 27 - June 23, 1999 26 235,210 9,040 182.4 0 0.36
June 23 - July 28, 1999 35 292,100 8,325 178.4 2.8 0.43
July 29 - Aug 25, 1999 28 228,510 8,209 184 3.3 0.34
Aug 26 - Sep 22, 1999 28 160,730 5,730 57.9 0 0.08
Sep 23 - Oct 27, 1999 36 224,710 6,242 184 3.7 0.34
Oct 28 - Nov 23, 1999 26 210,000 8,024 180.4 0 0.32
Nov 24 - Dec 22, 1999 29 222,120 7,696 231.9 2.2 0.43
Dec 23, 1999 - Jan 26, 2000 35 275,070 7,872 201.3 1.2 0.46
Jan 27 - Feb 23, 2000 28 212,950 7,608 208.6 8.8 0.35
Feb 24 - Mar 22, 2000 27 202,020 7,493 210 0 0.35
Mar 23 - Apr 26, 2000 35 260,110 7,432 186.5 0 0.40
Apr 27 - May 31, 2000 35 252,920 7,226 201.5 0 0.43
June 1 - June 28, 2000 28 190,590 6,807 170.1 0 0.27
June 29 - July 26, 2000 28 187,760 6,706 212.8 0 0.33
July 27 - Aug 23, 2000 28 183,790 6,564 204.7 0 0.31
Aug 24 - Sep 27, 2000 35 229,820 6,566 194.9 0 0.37
Sep 28 - Oct 26, 2000 29 175,300 6,325 138.5 0 0.20
Oct 27 - Nov 22, 2000 27 169,590 6,014 213.0 202.7 0.01
Nov 23 - Dec 20, 2000 28 141,930 5,046 159.7 0 0.19
Dec 21, 2000 - Jan 24, 2001 35 207,970 6,498 213.4 0 0.37
Jan 25 - Feb 28, 2001 35 215,600 6,151 178.3 0 0.32
Mar 1 - Mar 28, 2001 28 176,650 6,314 159.4 0 0.23
Mar 29 - Apr 25, 2001 28 155,570 5,504 181.5 0 0.24
Apr 26 - May 30, 2001 35 192,810 5,382 164.4 0 0.26
May 31 - June 27, 2001 28 136,610 5,013 202 0 0.23
June 28 - July 25, 2001 28 173,810 6,439 226.9 0 0.33
July 26 - Aug 22, 2001 28 187,720 6,697 237.4 0 0.37
Aug 23 - Sep 26, 2001 35 232,980 6,668 217.4 0 0.42
Sep 27, 2001 - Oct 24, 2001 28 186,960 6,672 225.4 0 0.35
Oct 25, 2001 - Nov 28, 2001 35 214,470 6,125 223.8 0 0.40
Nov 29, 2001 - Dec 19, 2001 21 117,130 5,580 176.6 0 0.17
Dec 20, 2001 - Jan 16, 2002 28 163,130 5,549 210.7 0 0.29
Page 1 of 4
P:\PRJ2003REM\NEC_501 Ellis Street\WR0434\EPA Annual Reports\2019 Annual\Report\Drafts\Client Review\Tables\2019 Annual Report TablesTable 1 - SCGWR Info

Jan 17, 2002 - Feb 25, 2002 40 215,500 5,210 159.1 0 0.29
Feb 26, 2002 - Mar 20, 2002 23 136,160 4,643 238.4 0 0.27
Mar 21, 2002 - Apr 15, 2002 26 94,470 4,544 140.5 0 0.11
Apr 16, 2002 - May 22, 2002 37 175,070 5,315 202.7 0 0.30
May 23, 2002 - June 19, 2002 28 201,600 7,156 207.4 0 0.35
June 20, 2002 - July 10, 2002 21 255,090 9,769 202 0 0.43
July 11, 2002 - Aug 21, 2002 42 193,600 6,518 141.8 0 0.23
Aug 22, 2002 - Sep 18, 2002 27 143,530 4,870 201.2 0 0.24
Sep 19, 2002 - Oct 17, 2002 28 175,390 5,770 203.8 0 0.30
Oct 18, 2002 - Nov 20, 2002 33 250,780 6,920 201 0 0.42
Nov 21, 2002 - Dec 18, 2002 27 184,290 7,009 137.2 0 0.21
Dec 19, 2002 - Jan 22, 2003 35 220,900 6,330 189.3 0 0.35
Jan 23, 2003 - Feb 19, 2003 28 166,230 6,183 226.7 0 0.31
Feb 20, 2003 - Mar 19, 2003 28 179,360 6,090 166.3 0 0.25
Mar 20, 2003 - Apr 28, 2003 39 207,300 5,504 146.7 0 0.25
Apr 29, 2003 - May 19, 2003 21 131,770 6,315 172.7 0 0.19
May 20, 2003 - June 30, 2003 41 227,380 5,732 160 0 0.30
July 1, 2003 - Aug 5, 2003 36 230,950 6,186 186 0 0.36
Aug 6, 2003 - Sep 3, 2003 28 160,410 5,960 143.4 0 0.19
Sep 4, 2003 - Sep 30, 2003 26 166,270 6,162 195.7 0 0.27
Oct 1, 2003 - Nov 5, 2003 35 238,150 6,608 186 0 0.37
Nov 6, 2003 - Dec 5, 2003 29 186,150 6,225 200.4 0 0.31
Dec 6, 2003 - Dec 31, 2003 25 164,280 6,315 201.4 0 0.28
Jan 1, 2004 - Jan 28, 2004 27 168,040 6,235 199.1 0 0.28
Jan 29, 2004 - Feb 27, 2004 29 183,810 6,169 167.1 0 0.26
Feb 28, 2004 - Mar 29, 2004 30 191,270 6,587 168.7 0 0.27
Mar. 30, 2004 - Apr. 22, 2004 23 149,410 6,546 173.8 0 0.22
Apr. 23, 2004 - May 19, 2004 26 174,000 6,500 168.6 0 0.24
May 20, 2004 - June 21, 2004 32 201,810 6,361 156.3 0 0.26
June 22, 2004 - July 21, 2004 30 171,870 5,729 144.8 0 0.21
July 22, 2004 - Aug 17, 2004 27 145,690 5,396 167.5 0 0.20
Aug 18, 2004 - Sep 22, 2004 36 162,960 4,527 173.3 0 0.24
Sep 23, 2004 - Oct 20, 2004 28 145,290 5,189 131.9 0 0.16
Oct 21, 2004 - Nov 15, 2004 26 182,140 7,005 152.9 0 0.23
Nov 16, 2004 - Dec 22, 2004 37 257,700 6,965 150.5 0 0.32
Dec 23, 2004 - Jan 19, 2005 28 205,800 7,350 144.9 0 0.25
Jan 20, 2005 - Feb 15, 2005 27 185,870 6,884 147.9 0 0.23
Feb 16, 2005 - Mar 28, 2005 41 283,820 6,922 149.1 0 0.35
Mar 29, 2005 - Apr 20, 2005 23 153,380 6,669 150.6 0 0.19
Apr 21, 2005 - May 25, 2005 35 255,110 7,289 144.2 0 0.31
May 26, 2005 - June 27, 2005 33 239,120 7,246 149.1 0 0.30
June 28, 2005 - July 25 2005 28 184,260 6,581 153.7 0 0.24
July 26, 2005 - Aug 15, 2005 21 152,620 7,268 139.2 0 0.18
Aug 16, 2005 - Oct 3, 2005 49 378,200 7,718 163.5 0 0.52
Oct 4, 2005 - Oct 24, 2005 21 160,050 7,621 149.8 0 0.20
Oct 25, 2005 - Nov 21, 2005 28 208,170 7,435 162.7 0 0.28
Nov 22, 2005 - Dec 30, 2005 39 302,470 7,756 158.5 0 0.40
Dec 31, 2005 - Jan 30, 2006 31 237,010 7,645 143.1 0 0.28
Jan 31, 2006 - Feb 27, 2006 28 205,260 7,331 134.3 0 0.23
Feb 28, 2006 - Apr 3, 2006 35 246,150 7,033 153.9 0 0.32
Apr 4, 2006 - Apr 24, 2006 21 150,040 7,145 145.6 0 0.18
Apr 25, 2006 - May 30, 2006 36 252,130 7,004 142.8 0 0.30
May 31, 2006 - June 30, 2006 31 205,290 6,622 156 0 0.27
July 1, 2006 - Aug 7, 2006 37 247,740 6,696 129.4 0 0.27
Aug 8, 2006 - Sep 5, 2006 28 183,410 6,550 128.6 0 0.20
Page 2 of 4

Sep 6, 2006 - Oct 2, 2006 26 182,180 7,007 158.6 0 0.24
Oct 3, 2006 - Nov 6, 2006 34 232,190 6,829 145.7 0 0.28
Nov 7, 2006 - Dec 4, 2006 27 179,870 6,662 170.9 0 0.26
Dec 5, 2006 - Jan 2, 2007 28 181,650 6,488 174.5 0 0.26
Jan 3, 2007 - Feb 1, 2007 29 193,140 6,660 146 0 0.24
Feb 2, 2007 - Mar 5, 2007 31 200,650 6,473 135.2 0 0.23
Mar 6, 2007 - Apr 2, 2007 27 176,910 6,552 134.9 0 0.20
Apr 2, 2007 - May 7, 2007 35 235,030 6,715 148 0 0.29
May 7, 2007 - June 4, 2007 28 200,670 7,167 145.8 0 0.24
June 4, 2007 - June 29, 2007 25 180,590 7,224 134.5 0 0.20
June 29, 2007 - July 30, 2007 32 230,300 7,197 127.6 0 0.25
July 30, 2007 - Sept 4, 2007 36 281,730 7,826 138 0 0.32
Sept 4,2007 - Oct 1, 2007 27 184,930 6,849 164.8 0 0.25
Oct 2, 2007 - Oct 29, 2007 28 220,880 7,889 127.4 0 0.23
Oct 30, 2007 - Nov 26, 2007 28 221,870 7,924 115.5 0 0.21
Nov 27, 2007 - Dec 31, 2007 35 282,300 8,066 145.8 0 0.34
Jan 1, 2008 - Jan 28, 2008 28 204,940 7,319 156.9 0 0.27
Jan 29, 2008 - Feb 25, 2008 28 214,970 7,678 141.8 0 0.25
Feb 26, 2008 - Mar 31, 2008 35 270,880 7,739 137.3 0 0.31
Apr 1, 2008 - Apr 28, 2008 27 215,770 7,991 144.9 0 0.26
Apr 29, 2008 - May 27, 2008 28 233,230 8,330 148.9 0 0.29
May 28, 2008 - June 30, 2008 33 215,260 6,523 135.8 0 0.24
July 1, 2008 - July 28, 2008 27 213,290 7,900 145.5 0 0.26
July 29, 2008 - Sep 2, 2008 35 271,770 7,765 157.2 0 0.36
Sep 3, 2008 - Sep 29, 2008 26 206,440 7,940 147.5 0 0.25
Sep 30, 2008 - Nov 3, 2008 34 255,440 7,513 145.6 0 0.31
Nov 4, 2008 - Dec 1, 2008 27 201,980 7,481 160.9 0 0.27
Dec 2, 2008 - Dec 29, 2008 27 199,220 7,379 146.5 0 0.24
Dec 30, 2008 - Feb 2, 2009 35 262,400 7,497 144.5 0 0.32
Feb 3, 2009 - March 2, 2009 28 208,760 7,456 132 0 0.23
March 3, 2009 - April 6, 2009 35 261,780 7,479 123.5 0 0.27
Apr 7, 2009 - May 4, 2009 28 202,690 7,239 133.5 0 0.23
May 5, 2009 - Jun 1, 2009 28 172,870 6,174 133.4 0 0.19
Jun 2, 2009 - Jun 29,2009 28 150,880 5,389 --* 98.6* 0.12
Jun 30, 2009 - Oct 5,2009 98 538,960 5,500 -- 114.2 0.51
Oct 6, 2009 - Dec 31,2009 87 483,970 5,563 -- 119.6 0.48
Jan 1, 2010 - March 17, 2010 76 412,870 5,433 -- 119.0 0.41
March 18, 2010 - June 30, 2010 105 577,330 5,498 -- 110.6 0.53
July 1, 2010 - Sep 14, 2010 76 412,240 5,424 -- 129.3 0.44
Sep 14, 2010 - Dec 30, 2010 108 537,210 4,974 -- 126.3 0.57
Dec 31, 2010 - Mar 14, 2011 73 367,480 5,034 -- 124.3 0.38
Mar 15, 2011 - Jun 13, 2011 91 493,950 5,428 -- 119.7 0.49
Jun 14, 2011 - Sep 12, 2011 91 531,530 5,841 -- 106.7 0.47
Sep 13, 2011 - Dec 12, 2011 91 521,590 5,732 -- 117.5 0.51
Dec 13, 2011 - Mar 14, 2012 92 515,530 5,604 -- 104.7 0.45
Mar 15, 2012 - Jun 18, 2012 95 515,360 5,425 -- 111.1 0.48
Jun 19, 2012 - Sep 10, 2012 83 466,110 5,616 -- 123.2 0.48
Sep 11, 2012 - Dec 17, 2012 97 564,160 5,816 -- 128.8 0.61
Dec 17, 2012 - Mar 13, 2013 86 493,330 5,736 -- 130.8 0.54
Mar 13, 2013 - Jun 17, 2013 96 570,110 5,939 -- 106.5 0.51
Jun 17, 2013 - Sep 27, 2013 102 639,190 6,267 -- 108.4 0.58
Sep 27, 2013 - Dec 31, 2013 95 626,700 6,597 -- 114.0 0.60
Jan 1, 2014 - Mar 26, 2014 85 555,620 6,537 -- 111.5 0.52
Mar 27, 2014 - Jun 23, 2014 89 566,410 6,364 -- 103.9 0.49
Jun 24, 2014 - Sep 30, 2014 99 616,450 6,227 -- 104.0 0.53
Oct 1, 2014 - Dec 31, 2014 92 530,290 5,764 -- 96.5 0.43
Page 3 of 4

Jan 1, 2015 - Mar 30, 2015 89 453,480 5,095 -- 103.2 0.39
Mar 31, 2015 - Jun 29, 2015 91 468,620 5,150 -- 98.0 0.38
Jun 30, 2015 - Sep 30, 2015 93 457,910 4,924 -- 131.0 0.50
Oct 1, 2015 - Dec 22, 2015 83 431,260 5,196 -- 111.4 0.40
Dec 23, 2015 - Mar 29, 2016 98 590,480 6,025 -- 98.9 0.49
Mar 30, 2016 - Jun 29, 2016 92 382,680 4,160 -- 106.6 0.34
Jun 30, 2016 - Sep 30, 2016 93 382,050 4,108 -- 82.8 0.26
Oct 1, 2016 - Dec 28, 2016 89 465,360 5,229 -- 95.2 0.37
Dec 29. 2016 - Mar 31, 2017 93 441,090 4,743 -- 89.5 0.33
Apr 1, 2017 - Jun 30, 2017 91 607,390 6,675 -- 87.0 0.44
Jul 1, 2017 - Sept 29, 2017 91 553,210 6,079 -- 98.0 0.45
Sept 30, 2017 - Dec 29, 2017 91 597,730 6,568 -- 101.0 0.50
Dec 30. 2017 - Mar 30, 2018 91 627,540 6,896 -- 99.4 0.52
Mar 31, 2018 - Jun 29, 2018 91 561,650 6,172 -- 82.2 0.39
Jun 30, 2018 - Sept 28, 2018 91 544,940 5,988 -- 86.7 0.39
Sept 29, 2018 - Dec 28, 2018 91 548,840 6,031 -- 100.6 0.46
Dec 29, 2018 - Mar 29, 2019 91 548,900 6,032 -- 80.7 0.37
Mar 30, 2019 - Jun 28, 2019 91 527,980 5,802 -- 85.5 0.38
Jun 29, 2019 - Sept 30, 2019 94 533,280 5,673 -- 90.9 0.40
Oct 1, 2019 - Dec 30, 2019 91 530,970 5,835 -- 101.5 0.45
TOTALS 8,065 49,950,420 6,435 -- -- 57.21
Notes:
*Beginning 13 May 2009, extracted groundwater is discharged without pre-treatment to the sanitary sewer under City of Mountain View Wastewater Discharge
Permit Number 925. At this time, collection of influent samples was discontinued. Quarterly effluent samples are collected as required by the City of Mountain
View Wastewater Discharge Permit. VOC recovery is estimated quarterly based on effluent concentration and total discharge.
µg/L - micrograms per liter
gpd - gallons per day
lbs - pounds
NA - Not Available
SCGWR - Source Control Groundwater Remediation
VOCs - volatile organic compounds
Page 4 of 4
Geosyntec Consultants
Table 2
Summary of Extraction Well and Monitoring Well
Construction Details
Reference Depth of
Well Screen
Elevation Screened
Well ID Date Installed Diameter Slot Size Aquifer Zone
(top of PVC) Interval
(inches) (inches)
(feet) (feet)
Extraction Wells
NEC-1AE May 1997 43.90 6 0.02 12.8-27.8 A
NEC-27AE May 1997 43.73 6 0.02 12.7-27.7 A
NEC-28AE April 2002 42.27 6 0.02 9-29 A
Monitoring Wells
NEC-1A September 1982 44.47 2 0.01 5-25 A
NEC-3A October 1985 43.76 4 0.02 24.95-28.72 A
NEC-7A October 1983 43.80 2 0.02 6-26.5 A
NEC-8A October 1983 42.29 2 0.02 5-25 A
NEC-9A October 1983 43.14 2 0.02 5-30 A
NEC-10A August 1984 39.43 2 0.02 10-30 A
NEC-11A August 1984 45.97 2 0.02 10-30 A
NEC-12A October 1985 44.24 4 0.02 18.90-28.32 A
NEC-20A January 1989 46.62 4 0.02 26-28 A
NEC-21A December 1988 44.06 4 0.02 26-28 A
NEC-22A May 1989 43.17 4 0.02 25-27 A
NEC-23A May 1989 43.77 4 0.02 26-28 A
NEC-24A December 1991 44.50 4 0.02 15.8-25.8 A
NEC-25A March 1996 42.30 4 0.02 17.19-27.19 A
NEC-26A March 1996 43.65 4 0.02 28.24-33.24 A
NEC-PZ-1A April 1999 42.47 2 0.02 11-16 A
NEC-PZ-2A April 1999 43.02 2 0.02 9-14 A
NEC-PZ-3A April 1999 43.16 2 0.02 8-13 A
Notes:
PVC - polyvinyl chloride
Page 1 of 1
P:\PRJ2003REM\NEC_501 Ellis Street\WR0434\EPA Annual Reports\2019 Annual\Report\Drafts\Client Review\Tables\2019 Annual Report TablesTable 2 - Well Info
Table 3
Groundwater Levels - September 2019
Reference Elevation Depth to Water Groundwater

Well ID (top of PVC) (top of PVC) Elevation Aquifer
(feet) (feet) (feet)
NEC-1A 44.47 8.38 36.09 A
NEC-1AE 43.90 8.42 35.48 A
NEC-3A 43.76 7.19 36.57 A
NEC-7A 43.80 10.15 33.65 A
NEC-8A 42.29 9.57 32.72 A
NEC-9A 43.14 7.69 35.45 A
NEC-10A 39.43 6.62 32.81 A
NEC-11A 45.97 9.41 36.56 A
NEC-12A 44.24 9.53 34.71 A
NEC-20A 46.62 8.21 38.41 A
NEC-21A 44.06 7.66 36.40 A
NEC-22A 43.17 8.57 34.60 A
NEC-23A 43.77 8.69 35.08 A
NEC-24A 44.50 9.53 34.97 A
NEC-25A 42.30 8.21 34.09 A
NEC-26A 43.65 8.58 35.07 A
NEC-27AE 43.73 21.45 22.28 A
NEC-28AE 42.27 13.97 28.30 A
NEC-PZ-1A 42.47 9.63 32.84 A
NEC-PZ-2A 43.02 9.88 33.14 A
NEC-PZ-3A 43.16 9.33 33.83 A
29A1 46.08 10.80 35.28 A
32A1 45.06 10.55 34.51 A
1
119A 45.95 11.06 34.89 A
1
153A 45.72 10.51 35.21 A
1
158A 48.09 9.58 38.51 A
Notes:
Water levels were collected on September 19, 2019
1
Regional Groundwater Remediation Program (RGRP) monitoring wells.
PVC - polyvinyl chloride
Page 1 of 1
P:\PRJ2003REM\NEC_501 Ellis Street\WR0434\EPA Annual Reports\2019 Annual\Report\Drafts\Client Review\Tables\2019 Annual Report TablesTable 3 - Sept20 GWE
Table 4
Analytical Results - 2018 Biennial Groundwater Monitoring Event
WELL ID NEC-1A NEC-7A NEC-8A NEC-9A NEC-10A NEC-11A NEC-12A NEC-20A NEC-21A NEC-22A NEC-23A NEC-23A(dup) NEC-24A NEC-25A NEC-26A NEC-27AE NEC-28AE NEC-PZ-1A NEC-PZ-2A NEC-PZ-3A
DATE OF SAMPLE 10/11/18 10/11/18 10/11/18 10/11/18 10/11/18 10/11/18 10/06/18 10/06/18 10/06/18 10/06/18 10/06/18 10/06/18 10/06/18 10/06/18 10/06/18 10/06/18 10/06/18 10/11/18 10/11/18 10/11/18
UNITS µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
Bromodichloromethane < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
Bromoform < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
Bromomethane < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 2.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
Chlorobenzene < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
Chloroethane < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 2.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
Chloroform < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
Chloromethane < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 10 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0
Dibromochloromethane < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 0.7 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
1,1-Dichloroethane < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.6 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
1,2-Dichloroethane < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
1,1-Dichloroethene < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 1.7 1.4 < 0.5 < 0.5 1.3 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 14 10 11 32 6.0 3.4 5.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 19 98 98 39 6.8 100* 10 31 5.2 8.7 28
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.5 < 0.5 1.7 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 1.2 1.1 2.4 2.1 3.0 1.1 11 < 0.5 0.7 1.4
1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
Freon 113 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 4.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0
Methylene Chloride < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 40 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
Tetrachloroethene < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
1,1,1-Trichloroethane < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
Trichloroethene 23 53 83 2.7 15 15 2.2 < 0.5 0.6 22 17 15 23 26 21 59 45 51 70 5.1
Trichlorofluoromethane < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 2.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
Vinyl Chloride < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
Dilution Factor (DF) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1* 1 1 1 1 1
Notes:
"<" indicates not detected above the reported detection limit
Samples analyzed by EPA Method 8260 (8010 Analyte list) by Enthalpy Analytical (formerly Curtis & Tompkins, Ltd.) of Berkeley, California.
* - DF of 2.5 for cis-1,2-Dichloroethene analysis
Page 1 of 1
P:\PRJ2003REM\NEC_501 Ellis Street\WR0434\EPA Annual Reports\2019 Annual\Report\Drafts\Client Review\Tables\2019 Annual Report TablesTable 4 - VOC
Table 5
Analytical Results - 2019 NEC-1AE Quarterly Sampling
WELL ID NEC-1AE NEC-1AE NEC-1AE NEC-1AE

DATE OF SAMPLE 03/04/19 06/20/19 09/11/19 12/10/19
UNITS µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
Bromodichloromethane <0.5 NA NA NA
Bromoform <0.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Bromomethane <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Carbon Tetrachloride <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Chlorobenzene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Chloroethane <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Chloroform <0.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Chloromethane <5.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Dibromochloromethane <0.5 NA NA NA
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.5 0.54 0.54 <0.5
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
1,1-Dichloroethane <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
1,2-Dichloroethane <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
1,1-Dichloroethene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 26 26 29 24
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.1
1,2-Dichloropropane <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Freon 113 <2.0 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Methylene Chloride <20 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Tetrachloroethene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Trichloroethene 20 20 22 20
Trichlorofluoromethane <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Vinyl Chloride <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Notes:
NA - not analyzed
"<" indicates not detected above the reported detection limit
March 2019 samples were analyzed by EPA Method 8260 by Ethalpy Analytical (formerly Curtis & Tompkins, Ltd.) of Berkeley, California.
June, September, and December 2019 samples were analyzed by EPA Method 8260 by Eurofins TestAmerica of Pleasanton, California
Page 1 of 1
P:\PRJ2003REM\NEC_501 Ellis Street\WR0434\EPA Annual Reports\2019 Annual\Report\Drafts\Client Review\Tables\2019 Annual Report TablesTable 5 - 01AEVOC
FIGURES

ast
Alto
(§J
.
>
<
oyote "';.
Pa ►.,
Alto
hc,r hog
Firk
Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman (MEW)
Superfund Study Area
501 Ellis Street
L os Altos
Hill s Almond Aye
L os Altos
,t
~
o"'
,,;
<.,.
..,
Cuesta Dr rr
.
>
li
< Cue L,
:,, ! Paris
!:
a.
aE
IJ)
:!
IJ)
:E
"'"
Monroe S
³
Coll«Je
"
6
~ W Remingt 011 Dr
<
>,
1;!
::.
IJ)
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,
NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri
0 1
Miles
Site Location Map
0 15
³
Miles
WR2814
Geosyntec e>
501 Ellis Street
consultants
April 2020
Figure
1
D:\GIS\NEC\Project\2019_AnnualReport\Fig01_SiteLocation.mxd 3/13/2020 4:12:08 PM
I
NEC-10A
E T
R E
555A ELLIS STREET
S T
S
N A
L I
T I
O N
E L
A L
AV
E N
U E
515 ELLIS STREET
•
. r---•~·······~·············~...
NEC-PZ-2A
NEC-PZ-1A .......... ~
NEC-PZ-3A
NEC-27AE
NEC-8A NEC-28AE
--------------
NEC-25A NEC-22A
NEC-9A
..................
..........................
. .........................
••
··---.
NEC-23A NEC-12A
32A I
•.I NEC-7A I
•.
501 ELLIS STREET
NEC-21A
I
I
153A
······~......................................
S . F
.
NEC-24A
•
·~··············~.................
NEC-26A NEC-1A
NEC-3A
NEC-1AE
I
W A · · · · · · · ~······•~..................................... • :•'Ill
T E
119A R D I S
29A T R
I C T
NEC-11A
···· ················•~.........• /
NEC-20A •
E T
R E
S T
158A 475 ELLIS STREET

S
L I
E L
Legend
Site Layout
³
(
! Extraction Well
" Monitoring Well 501 Ellis Street
Ñ · Piezometer
Geosyntec <> Figure
L....J 501 Ellis Street Boundary
2
consultants
Notes: 0 80
- Imagery provided by USGS, April 2011 Feet WR2814 April 2020
D:\GIS\NEC\Project\2019_AnnualReport\Fig02_WellLocationsMap.mxd 3/13/2020 6:52:42 PM
60 60
50 50
Volume of Groundwater Extracted (MG)

40 40
Mass of VOCs Recovered (pounds)
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
Date
Legend
VOC Mass Removed Groundwater Extracted and
Volume of Groundwater Extracted Mass of VOCs Removed
501 Ellis Street
VOC = Volatile Organic Compounds Mountain View, California
MG = Million Gallons
Figure
3
WR2814 April 2020
P:\GIS\NEC\Project\2019_AnnualReport\Fig03_GWExt_VOCsRemov_Data.ppt
39
38
37
36
35
Groundwater Elevation (feet above mean sea level)
34
33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
25
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Date
Monitoring well shown in hydrograph Groundwater Elevations in Selected Monitoring Wells

NEC-7A NEC-11A
501 Ellis Street
Monitoring well not shown in hydrograph Mountain View, California
NEC-12A NEC-23A
501 Ellis Street boundary
NEC-24A NEC-26A Figure
Notes: 4
- Imagery provided by USGS, April 2011 WR2814 April 2020
D:\GIS\NEC\Project\2019_AnnualReport\[Fig04_GWE_SelectedWells_Data.xlsx]
NEC10A
I 32.81
"
E T
R E
555A ELLIS STREET
S T
S
L I
N A
T I
E L
O N
A L
AV
E N
U E
I
515 ELLIS STREET
32.0
32.0
. NEC-PZ-1A NEC-PZ-2A
33.14
32.84 ..................NEC-PZ-3A
, ......
33.0
Ñ· NEC8A~
32.72
·
Ñ ··------ 33.83
NEC28AE
(
" U·!
28.30 ·
Ñ"
NEC27AE NEC25A NEC9A 34.0
22.28
" 34.09 35.45
(
! "
NEC23A NEC12A
35.08 34.71
33.0 " "
35.0
501 ELLIS STREET
----
32A
34.51 NEC21A 36.0
34.0 NEC7A 36.40 ----
33.65
~
"
"
I " NEC24A ,
r. .........................,.
34.97
.
NEC3A
................ NEC1AE 36.57
" 35.48 "
NEC26A
119A 153A 35.07 " "
(
!
35.21 S . F NEC1A
34.89 29A . W A
35.28 T E 36.09
" " R D I S
T R NEC11A
" I C T
36.56
"
36.0
37.0 --- --·
38.0
--·
37.0 NEC20A
38.41
"
38.0
E T
158A
R E
38.51
"
S T
475 ELLIS STREET

S
L I
E L
Legend Groundwater Elevation Contour Map

Estimated Capture Zone Ñ
· Piezometer (
! Extraction Well Extraction Rates (gpm) and Capture Zone
³
Groundwater Elevation Contour (ft MSL) 501 Ellis Street Boundary Monitoring Well
NEC-1AE - 0 Third Quarter 2019
" NEC-27AE - 1.86
NEC-28AE - 1.96 501 Ellis Street
Closely Spaced Groundwater Contour Mountain View, California
Notes:
- Water levels were collected on September 19, 2019. Geosyntec <> Figure
- Extraction from well NEC-1AE discontinued on May 13, 2009.
5
ft MSL - feet mean sea level
consultants
gpm - gallons per minute 0 80
D:\GIS\NEC\Project\2019_AnnualReport\Fig05_GWcontours_3Q.mxd 3/13/2020 6:22:37 PM
\
/ / /
\ \ \ /
/ / \
\ / /
\ \ \
/ /
/ / \ /
\ / \ \ \
\ / / /
\ \ \ /
\
Figure
/ /
/ / \ / \ /
\ / \ / \ \
\ / / /
6
\ \ \ \ /
/ /
/ / \ / \ / \
\ \ \ /
\ / / \
Simulated A Aquifer Capture Zone

/ / /
\ \ \ \ \ /
/ / / /
/ \ / \ / \
/ \ /
\ / \ / / \ \ /
/ \ \ / /
\ \ \
/ / /
\ /\ /
\ / / \

\ / \
First Quarter 2019

/ \ \
/ \ / / \ / /
April 2020
\ / / \ \ / / \
\ \ \
\
/ /
/ /\ / /
501 Ellis Street

/ / \ \ \
\ \ \ / \
/ \ \ /
Geosyntec <>
/ \ / / / / / /
/ \ \ \ \ \ / \
\ / \ / /\
\ / / \
consultants
/ / / \ \
\ \ / / \ \
\ \ \ / / /
/ / / / / \ /
/ \ / \ \ \ \ \ /
\ / \ /
/
\ /\ / / \ \
\ / / \ / / \ \ \
\ \ \ \ / /
/ / / / / \
/ / \ \ / \ /
\ / \ \ \ / \
/ / / \ \
NEC-12A
/ \ / \ \ \
\ / / / \ / / \ /
\ \ \ \ \ / / / \
/ / / / \ \ / \ /
/ \ \ \ / /\ \ \
/ / \ / /
\ \ \
WR2814
\ / \ / / \ /
/ / \ \ / / / \ /
\ / \ \ / / \ /
\ / / \ \ / \
\ \ / / \ / \ \
\ \ /
"
/ / / / / \ \ \
\ \ / \ / / /
/ \ \ \ / / \ / \
/ \
" NEC-11A
/ \ / / \ \ / / \
\ /
\ / \ \ / /\ / / \ \
\ / \ \ \ \ /
\ / / / / / \
/ / / \ \ / / \ / \ / \
\ \ / \ / / \ \ / \
/ /\ \
" NEC-20A
\ \ \ / / / \
/ \ \ /
555A ELLIS STREET
\ / / \ \ / / /
/ / / / \ \
Feet
\ \ \ / \ \
/
\
/
/ / \ \ / / \
\
/
\
/
³
\ / / /\ \ \
80
/ \ / \ / / /
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / \
/ / / / / / \ / \ \
\ / \
/\
" NEC-9A
\ \ \ \ / \ / \ /
Transmissivity: 91.3 ft2/day Extraction Rates (gpm)

/ \
/ / /\ / / \ \
" NEC-21A
\ / \ / /
/
/ \ \ \ \ /
/
/ / \
NEC-27AE - 1.67
NEC-28AE - 2.05
\
\ \ / \ / / / / \ / \ \ \
\ / /
NEC-1AE - 0.00
/
/
\ \ \ /\ \ \ / \ / \ / \
/
/\ \ \ \
\
/ / / / / / /
\ \ \ /
" NEC-3A
\ / \ \ / / / \ \ /
/ / \ / \ \
" NEC-1AE
\ / / \ \ / \
/\ \ / / /
515 ELLIS STREET
/ / \ \ \ / \
\
/
/ \ \ /\ / \
/
/ / / /
\
/
\
/ / /
\
\ / \ \ \ / / \ \ / \
/ \ \ / / \ \
NEC-22A
/ / \ \ / \
0
/ \ / /
/
\ / / \ \ /
/\
NEC-PZ-3A\
\ / \ / \ / \ \ \
\ / / \ / \ /
/\
\ · ..................................
\ \ / / / / /
/ \ \ / \ \ / \ \ /
/ / \
(
\
!
\ / \ \ / \ / \
\ / / \ / /
/ NEC-25A
/ / /
/
\ \
/
/\ \
/
/ \ \ \
\
/
NEC-1A
/
\
/
\
" NEC-10A
/ \
\
/
\
/
\
\/ \ / / / / /
\/ /\ \ \ / / / \ \ / \ / \ /
/ \ \ /
" "
/ \ \ \
"
\ / \ / \ / \ \
/
\ / \
\
/ /\ / \ / / \ / \ /
NEC-26A
\
/ \
Ñ
\ /\ \ \ / \ \
. ...........................................
/ / /
501 ELLIS STREET

/ / \/ / / \ / \ / \ \
\ /\ \ / \ / / /
NEC-PZ-2A
\ \ / \ /
I C T
\ / \ \ / \ \
\\/ NEC-28AE
\ /
/
/
/
/ / \
\
/ \ /
\
/
/
/ /\ \ \ \
/ \
/
/ \ \
\
\/ \ \ / /
0.008 ft/ft, N28W

/ /
\
/
/
/
/
/\ /
\
\ / \/ / \ \ \ / \ / \ /
Hydraulic Gradient
/ / \ \ \ \ \ / \ /
\ \ \
Model Parameters:
/ \ / / / / \
T R
\ \ \ /
NEC-24A
/
\
\ \ \
/
/ / \ / / / / \ / \ / \
/\ / /
/\ /
NEC-8A
\ / \ \ \ \ / \ \
// /\ \/ \ / \ / / /
Ñ
\
........
\ / \ \ \
D I S
\ /\ / / / / \
/
\
/
/ / /
I
\/ \
·
\
\
/\ / /
\
//
\ \ / / \ \
\
/ \ / \ / \ / / \
.............
/ /
\
/\
\
\ \
Recharge
/\ \ \ / \ \ /
1 in/yr
\/ / /
\
/
D:\GIS\NEC\Project\2019_AnnualReport\Fig06_CaptureZones1Q.mxd 3/13/2020 6:28:49 PM

\
/\
/\
/
/
(
!
\ \ \
///\\ / \ / / / \ \
/
E T / / \ / / \
\\
"
"
/ / / \ \
\ \\ / \ / / \
// \
\ \ \ \ \ / / \
R
\
/
R E \/ / \ / \ \
/ \ /
\NEC-27AE
\ \ / / \ / /
/ \
\
/ / \
T E
S T / / / / \ / / \ \
\
/
\ \ \ \ \ / \
\ \ / \
Ñ
/
...
S / / / / / \ \ / \
L I / /
·
\ /
W A
\ \ \ / / \ \ / / \ \
E L / \ \ \ \ / \
NEC-PZ-1A
/
501 Ellis Street Boundary

/ \ / / / / \
" NEC-7A
\/\ \ /
.,.,.,.._.,,.
/ / \
" NEC23A
/ \
\
/ / \
/
\\
/
/
\ /
:•..........
\
'
\ \ / / /
//\
\/ \ \ \
475 ELLIS STREET

/ \ / \ \
\/ / \
/
.
/ / / / / /
/\/ /
\ \\\
\ \
(
!
S . F
\
.................
\
/// \
\\ \ / \ \ \ \ / \ /
/ / / /
Particle Pathline Indicating Simulated Capture Zone

\ / / \ / \
/\ / / / \ \ \
/\
/
/\
\
/\
/
/ \ \ \ \ / \
/\ \ / /
\
/ \ /
/
/ /

/
........
/ \ / / \ \ \
/\
Piezometer
\ \ / \ \
/ / \ \ / \
/
/\ / /
\
\ / / \
/ / /\
...
\ / \ \ \ / /
/
\ \\ / / \ /
\
\ \
/ / \
/
/
..........
/ \
/
/ \
\
/\
//\ \
\
\ \
/ \\ /\ / \ / / / /
\
/
/ / / \ \
/
\ / / \ \ \ \ \
\
\ \ \ / \ / / / / /
/ \ / \ \ \\ \
Ñ
/ / / /
..............J
...........
:
/ \ / \ /
·
\ \ \ / \ \ \
/ / \ /
\ / \
=
\ \
\
- Imagery provided by USGS, April 2011

gpm - gallons per minute W - West
N - North
yr - year
Monitoring Well
U E
Extraction Well
E N
E T
R E
S T
Legend
in - inches
AV
S
L I
ft - feet
(
!
E L
Notes:
"
L
N A
\ /
/ \ /
/ \ / \
\ / /
\ \ \
/ / /
\ / \ / \
/ \ \
\ / / / /
\ \ \ \
/ / /
/
Figure
\ / \ \ /
/ \ \ \
/ / / /
\ \ \ \
\ /
7
/ / / / \
\ / \ \ / /
\ \ \ \
/ / / / / /
\

\ \ \ \ / /\
/ / \ \
/ \ / \ / /
\ / \ \ \ /
/ \ / / / / \
/ \ \
\ \ \ / /\ /
/ / \ \ \
/ / /
Second Quarter 2019

/ \ \ / /
\ \
/\

\ / / / / \ \
/ \ \ /\ /
April 2020
/ \ \ / /
\ \ / \ \ \ \
/ / \ / / / /
501 Ellis Street

/ \ \ \ \ / \ \
\ / / / / / \
Geosyntec <>
\ / \ \ \ / /\ / /
/ \ \ \ \ \
\ / / /
/ / \ / /
consultants
\ /
/
\
/
\
/ / /\ \ \ \ /
/ \ \ / / \ / / \
\ \ / \ \ \
/ \ / \ \
\ / / \ / / / / /
/
\ \
/ /
\ /\ \ \ \ / \
/ \ \ / /\ / / \
/ / \ \ \
\ \ / / \ \
\ / / / / /
NEC-12A
/ / / \ / \ \
\ \ \ / /
\ /\ \ \ / /
/ \ / /\ / / \
\ \ \ \
/ / \ \ /
/ \ / / / / /
\ \ / \ / \ \
\ /\ \
WR2814
/ / \ / \ / /
\ / / \ \
\ / \ \ / /\ /
\
\ \ \
\ / / / / / /
/ / \
"
/ \ \ \
/ \ \ /
/
\ /
\ /\ \ /
\
/
\
/
\
\ / /\ / /
\ /
" NEC-11A
/ \ \ \ \ \
\ / \ / /
\ / / / / / \
\ \ / /
/ / / \ \ /\ \
/
/
\
/
\ \ \
\ \ / \ / / / /\ / \
\ \ \ \ \ \ /
" NEC-20A
/ / / /
/
/ / / \ \ /
555A ELLIS STREET
\ \ / / /
/\
\
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ /
/
/
Feet
/ / /\ / \
\ / \ / \ / \ \
³
/ \ / \ \ / /
80
\ \ / / \ /
\ / / / / \ \ / / / /
\ \ \ /\ \ / \ \ \ \ /
\ \
" NEC-9A
/\ /
/
/ / / \ \

\
\ / \ \ \ / / / /
" NEC-21A
/
\ / \ / / \ \ / \ / / / / \
/ /
NEC-27AE - 1.89
NEC-28AE - 1.97
\ / / /\ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ / \
NEC-1AE - 0.00
/ \ \ / \
\ /
/
/ / \ / /
\
/ \ \ \ / / / \
\ / / / \ \ / / / / \
/
" NEC-3A
/ \ \ \ /
/
\ \ \ \ \ \
" NEC-1AE
/ \
\
/ \ / /
/
515 ELLIS STREET
/
\ /\ \ \ / / \
\
/ / \ / /
/
/ / \ / \
/
.......
\ / / /
\
\ \ \ / / \
\
/ / / \ \ \ \ / \
NEC-22A
/\ \ \ \
NEC-PZ-3A \/
\ / / /
0
/
..............................................
\ \ / / /
/ /\ \ \ / / \ \ \
/ \ / / \ / / / \
\ \ / / / / \ / /
/ / \ / \ \ \ \ \
\
/ \ \
(
!
\ \ / \ \ / /
/\
/ NEC-25A
/
/
/
/ /
/
\ / \ \
\
/
/
/ /
\
\
\
\
NEC-1A
\ /
" NEC-10A
\ /
\
\/ / / \ / / / / \ / \
\ / / \ \ / \ \ / \ / / \
\ \ \ \
" "
/ \
"
\ /\ \ \
/
/
\
/ \ / / / / /
\ /\ / \ / / \ \
NEC-26A
\ /
Ñ
/ / \
..............................................
/ /\ \ / \ / / \ / \
501 ELLIS STREET

/ \ / / \ / /
\ ·
\ \ \ / \ \ \ \
NEC-PZ-2A
\ \ \ \
/
/ \
I C T
\
/ / / / /
\\/ NEC-28AE
/
/
/ /
\
/\ /
\
\ / / \
/
\ \ /
\/
\
'
/ / \
/
\ \
\
/\ \ / / / \ /
0.008 ft/ft, N28W

/ /
/
\ / \ \ / / \ / / \ /
/\ \
\
\/ / \ \ \ \
Hydraulic Gradient
..................
\ \ \ \ \ \
Model Parameters:
\ / / / /
T R
/
\
/ \ /\
NEC-24A
/ / /
/
/ / / \ \ \ /
/\ /\ /\ \ / /
\ / / \ \ / \
\
/
NEC-8A
\ \ / /
/\ / \ \ /\ \ \
Ñ.
// /\ \ \ \ \
/
D I S
\ \ / / /
/
/
. ..............
/
/ /\ / / \ /\
/
\/ / \
·
/ / \
\
/
\
/
//
\ \ \ \ / \
\
/
\
/ /\ /\ / \ \ \ / \ /
\
/ \ /
/\ /
Recharge
/
\ \ \
1 in/yr

\
/\ \ \ \
/
/ \ \
(
!
\ / /
///\\ / /
/
/ / / / /
E T / \ / / \ /\
\\
\
"
"
\ \\ \ \ \ \ /
// \
\ \ \ / / \ / \
R
/
R E /\ / \ \ / / \ /
\
\
\NEC-27AE
\ \ / / / \ \ \
/
/ / / /
T E
S T \ \ \ / / \ / / /
\ / \ \
..............
/ \ \ / \
\ \
Ñ
S / / \ \ / / / \ /
L I / \ \
·
\ \ / / \ \
W A
/ \ / / / / / /
\ \
\
E L / \ \ \ \ / \ /\
NEC-PZ-1A

\ \ /
/
// / / \
" NEC-23A
\
NEC-7A
/ / \ /
\
\\ /
/
\ \
\\
/
/
\ / / / / / / \ \
//\
\/ \
475 ELLIS STREET

\/ / \ \ \ \ \ \ / /
\ /\
/\
.
\/ / / / / / \
(
!
\
/
/ / /
S . F
/ \
\
\\ \
\\
\ \ / / / \ \ \ /
//
/

/
/ \ \ \ \
\\
\ / \ / /
/\
/\
\
/
\ /\
/\
/
/ / /
/\
/
/ \ / / / \
"
\ \ \ / / \ \ \ \ /
/ \

/ \
........
\ \
Piezometer
/\ / \ / / / /
/
/ /
\
\ \ / / / \
/ \ / \ / \ \ \ \ \ \/
........ ........
/ / /\ /
/
\
\
\ \ / /
\ \ \ / \ / / / / / \
/
/ / / \ /
\
/
\
/
\ \ \ \
\
/\ / \ \ \
I
/ \ /
I
/
/\ / / / / /
\
/ / / \ \ \
\ / / / \ \ / \ / \ \ \ \ \ /
\ \ \ \ / \ /
/ /\ \ / / / /
Ñ
\ / \ / / \ \ \
/ \ \
·
\ / / \ / \/ \ / /
\ \ / \ / \ \ \ /
/ / / \ \ / \/
/ \ /
\ \

\ / \ / \ \
/ \ \ /

N - North
\ / / \
yr - year
\ \
Monitoring Well
U E
Extraction Well
E N
E T
R E
S T
Legend
in - inches
AV
S
L I
ft - feet
(
!
E L
Notes:
"
L
N A
/ /
\ / \ /
/ \ \
\ / / /
\ \ \
/ / /
\ / \ / \
/ \ \
\ / / / /
\ \ \ \
/ / /
Figure
\ / \ / \ /
/ \ \ \
/ / / /
\ \ \ \ /
8
\
/ / / \
\ / \ / /
\ / \ \
/ \ / / / /\
/

\ \ \ \ \ / /\
/ / \ \
/ \ / \ / /
\ /
\
/
/
\ /
\
/ / /\ \
\ /
\
\ \ \ / /\ /
/ \ \ \
/ / \ / / /
/ \ \ \ \ / \

Third Quarter 2019
\ / / / / / \
\ /
April 2020
/ / \ \ \ / /\ / \
\ \ / \ \ \
/ / \ / / / /
501 Ellis Street

\ /
/ /
\
/
\
/ / /\ \ \ \
\ /
Geosyntec <>
/ \ / \ \ \ / /\ / \
\ / \ \ \
\ / / / /
consultants
/ / \ \ \ / \
\ \ / \ \ /
/ / / / / \
\ /
\ \ \ \ / /\ / \
/ / \ \ \
/ \ / / / / /
\ / / \ / \
\ \
/ /
\ /\ \ \ \ /
/ / /\ / / \
/ / \ \ \ \ \
\ \ / / \ \ /
/ / / /
NEC-12A
/ \ / \ / \ \ \
\ /
\ \ /
\ /\ \
/
/ /
/ / /\ / \
/ \ \ \ \
/ \ / \ \ /
/ / / / / /
\ \ \ / \ \ \
/ /\
WR2814
\ / \ \ / /
/ \ / / / / \ \
\ \
/ \ / /\ \ \
\ \ \
\ / / / / / /
/ \
"
/ \ \ /
/ \ /
\ / \ \ /\ \ /
/
\
/
\ \
\ / \ / / / /\ / \
" NEC-11A
/ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ / / / / /
\ / / / \ \ \ / / /
/ / \ \ /\ \ /
/
\ \ \ \
/ \ / / /\ / \
\ \ / \ / \
\ \ /
" NEC-20A
\ / \ / / / /
/
/ / / \ \ /
555A ELLIS STREET
/ \ / / /
\ /\
\
\ \ \ \ \ \ \
/ \ \
Feet
/ / /\ / \
/ \ / \ / \
³
/ \ \ \ / / /
80
\ / \ / \ / / /
\ / / \ / \ \ / / \ /
/ \ / \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ /
" NEC-9A
/\ /
/
/ / / \ \
\

\ / \ \ \ / / / /
" NEC-21A
/
/
\
/ / / \ \ / \ / / / / \
\ / \
NEC-27AE - 1.86
NEC-28AE - 1.93
\ / / /\ \ / \ \ \ \ \
\ \
NEC-1AE - 0.00
/ \ /\ / \ /
\
/
/ / \ \ / / \
\
/ \ \ / / \ / / \
\ / / / \ \ / / \ / /
" NEC-3A
\ \
/
\ / /\ \ / \ \ \
\
" NEC-1AE
/ \ / \ / /
515 ELLIS STREET
/\
/
/ \ \ / / \
\
\ / / \ / / \ /
/
/ / \ / / / \
/\ \ /
\
\ \ / \ / \ \ \
/ \ \
NEC-22A
\ \ / /
/\ /
NEC-PZ-3A\/
\ / / /
0
\ \ / \ / \ \ \
/ /\ \ / / / / \
\ / \ / \ / / / \ / /
/ \ \ / \ \ / \ \
/ /\ / \ \
\
\ /
(
!
\ \ / \ / /
/\ \ /
/ NEC-25A
/ \
/
/
/
\
/
/ \
\
/ / / /
/
\
\
\
\
\
NEC-1A
\ /
" NEC-10A
\/ \ / / /
\
/ \ / / / / \ / \
\ / / \ \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ /
/ \ \
" "
/
"
\ \ \ / /
/
/
\
/ / \ / / \ \ / \
\ /\ / \ / / \
NEC-26A
\ / \
Ñ
/ \ / \ / / / / \ / /
/\ \
501 ELLIS STREET

/ / \ \ / \
\ ·
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ /
NEC-PZ-2A
/
\ /
\
/ \ / / \ /\ /
I C T
/ /
\ / NEC-28AE
/
/
/ / \ \ /
\
/\ \ \
\
/ \
/
\ / /
· ................................
/
\/
\
\
/\ / \ / / / \ / / \ \
0.008 ft/ft, N28W

/ / /
/
\ \
/\ /\ \ / \ \ \ \ \
\
\ \
Hydraulic Gradient
/
..................
/ \ / /
\ \ / / \ /\ /
Model Parameters:
\ / \
T R
/ \ /
\
/
NEC-24A
/ \
/
/ / / / \ \ /
/\ /\ /
\ \ /
\ \ / / \ / / \
\ \
NEC-8A
/\ \ \ / \ \ \ \ \
// / \ / / / /
Ñ
/\ / /
D I S
\ / \ \ /
\
\/ \ \
\/
/ /
. ............
/
/
\/ /\ / / / / / \ \
\
\
\
//
\ / / \
\
\ / \ \
\
/\ \ \ \ / /
/ /\ \
\
/\ \
/
Recharge
\ / \ \ \
1 in/yr

\
/\ / /
/
/ \ / /
(
!
\ / / /
///\\ /
/
E T \ / / / / \ \ \ / \ \ \ /
\\
"
"
\ \\ / \ \ / / \ /
// \
\ \ \ \ / / \ \
R
\ \
/
R E /\ / \
\
\
\NEC-27AE
\ \ / / / / / / / /
/
/ / / \ /\ /
T E
S T \ \ \ \ / / \ \ \ \ \
/
/ \
\ .. '
\ \ / / \
Ñ
/ / \ \
/ / \
S / \
L I /
·
\ \ / / /
W A
\ / /
/ / \ \ \ \ / \ /\ /
\
E L / \ \ \ / \
NEC-PZ-1A

\ / / \
/
// \
" NEC-23A
\ \
" NEC-7A
\ / / \ \
/
/ /
\\
/ / / / /
/
\ \ \ / /
//\
\/ \ \ \ /
475 ELLIS STREET

/ \ \ \ / \ \ /
\/ / \
/\
/
.
\/ / \ / / \
(
!
/
/
/ \ \
/ / / \
S . F
\\ \ / \
\\
/ \ \ \
//
\ /

/
\
\ \ / \ /\ /
\\
/ /
/
\
/\ /
/\
/
/
/ \
/\
/
/\
/
/ \ / \
\ / / \ \ \ \
/\ \ / \ \

/ \ / /
/ / \ /
Piezometer
/\ \ / / / / \
/
/ \
\
\ /
........ ..........
\ / \ \ \ \
/ \ / \ \ \
/ / /\ /
/
\ / / /
\
\ \\ \ / \ / / / \ /
/
/ / / \ \ \ \ \ \ /
/
\
\
// \ / \ / \ / \
I
/
/
/ / /
/ \\ /
\
/ \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ /
\ / / / \ / \ / \ /
\ \ \ \ \ / / / \
/ / / \ \ \ \ /
Ñ
\ / / \ \ / / \ /
\ / /
·
/ / \ \ \ \
\ \ / \ / \ /
/ / \ \ /
/ / \ / \ /
\ \ \ \ \

/ \ / /
/ \ \ \ /

N - North
\ /
yr - year
\ \
Monitoring Well
U E
Extraction Well
E N
E T
R E
S T
Legend
in - inches
AV
S
L I
ft - feet
(
!
E L
Notes:
"
L
N A
/ /
\ / \ /
/ \ \
\ / / /
\ \ \
/ / /
\ / \ / \
/ \ / \
\ / / /
\ \ \ \
/ /
Figure
/ / \ /
\ \ \ \ /
/ / / / \
\ \ \ /
\
9
\ /
/ / \
/ / \ / \ /
\ \ \ /
/ / / \ \
/ /

\ \ \ /
\ \
/ /
/
\ /\
/ / \ / \ / / \
\ \ \ \ \ /
/ / / / / /
\ \ \ \ \ \
/ /
/ /\ /
/ / \ \ \
Fourth Quarter 2019

\ \ /

/ / \ \ \ / /
\ \ / / / / \
April 2020
/ / \ \ \ \
\ \
/
/ /\ / /
/ / \ \ \ \
501 Ellis Street

\ \ / /
/ \ \ \ / / /
/ / / / / \ \
Geosyntec C>
\ \ / \ \ \ \
/ \ /
/ /\ / /
\ / \ \ \ \
consultants
/ \ / /
\ \ \ \ / / /
/ / / / / \ \ \ /
/ \ / \ \ \ / \ \
\ / \ / / /
/ \ \ \ \
\ / / \ / / /
\ \ \ \ / / / \
/ / / / \ \ \ /
/ \ \ \ / / \ / / \
/ \ / / \ \
\ \ \
NEC-12A
\ / / / \ / / /
\ \ \ / / /
\ \ / / \ \ / \
/ / \
/ \ \ \ / /\ / / \
\ / / \ \ \ \
/ \ / / /
WR2814
\ / / \ \ \ / / /
/ \ / / \ \ / \ /
\ \ / \ \
/ \ \ / /\ / / \
\ / \ \ \ \
/
"
/ / \ / / / /
\ \ / \ \ / \ / \ / /
/ / \ / / / \ \ \ \
" NEC-11A
\ / \ \ / /\ / / \
\ / \ \ \ \ \
\ / / / / / /
\ / / \ /
/ /
\
/
\ / /
\ /\ \ \ \ / /
\ \ \
\ / / /\ / / \
\ \
" NEC-20A
/ \ \ \ \ \ /
555A ELLIS STREET
\ / / / / / / /
/
/ \ / \ /
\ \ /\ \ \ /
Feet
\
\ \ \
/
/ / \ \
\
/ \ / / /\ / /
³
/ \ / \
80
\ \ \ \ \ /
\ \ / / / / / / /
/ / \ / \ \ / \ / \
\ \ \ \ / \ \
" NEC-9A
/ \ \ \
/ /\ / /

/ / /
/
\ / \
" NEC-21A
\ \
\
\ \ / / \
/
/ \ / / / / / /
\
NEC-27AE - 1.78
NEC-28AE - 2.03
\ / / / \ \ / \ \ \
\ / \ \ / \ \
NEC-1AE - 0.00
/ \ \ / \ \ /
\ /
/
/\ / / \
\
/ / / \ \ / \
\ \ \ / / / /
" NEC-3A
\ / / / \ / \ / \
/ / \ / \ \
" NEC-1AE
\ \
/\ \ \ /
/
/ \ \ /
515 ELLIS STREET
/ \
\
/ \ /\ / / \ /
/ \
/
\
/ \ /
/
/ \ / / \
\
\ / / /
\
/ \ /\ / \ / \ \ / /
NEC-22A
/ \ \ / \ \ \ /
0
\
/
\ / / \ \ \ \
NEC-PZ-3A\
\ / / / / \
\ / / \ / /
\ /\ \ \ / / / \ \
/ \ / \ / / / \
/ / \ \ /
/\ \ / \ /
(
!
/ \ / \ \ \ / \ /
\
NEC-25A
\ /
\
\ /
/
/\ \
/
/ / /
/
/
\
\
NEC-1A
/ / / \
" NEC-10A
\
\/ \ /\ \ \ / / / / \ \ \
\/ / \ / \ / \ / \ / /
/ \ /
" "
\ / \
"
\ \ / / \
/\
/
/ \ \
\
/ \ / \ \ / \
\ /
NEC-26A
\ /\ / \
Ñ
/ / / / / \ / /
/ \ / \
501 ELLIS STREET

/\ \ / / / / \ \ / \ \
·
\ \ \ \ \ /
NEC-PZ-2A
\ / \ / \ \ / / \
I C T
/ / \
\\/ NEC-28AE
/
/
/ \ \ / \
\
/ \
\
/\ \
/
\
/
/
\
\
\/
\ / / / / / / \ / / /
/
\
0.008 ft/ft, N28W

\ / /
\
/
/
/ \/ \ / \ / \ \ / \ \ \
\
\
\ \ \
Hydraulic Gradient
/ /\ / \ / \ \ / / / \
/
Model Parameters:
\ \ \ / \ \
T R
\ / \
NEC-24A
\
\
/ /
/
/ / / / / / \ / / \ /
/\ /\ / / \ / /
NEC-8A
\/ \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ \
/\ \ /\ \ \ / /
// / \
Ñ
/\ / / \
D I S
\ / \ \
/
/
/
\/ \ / \ / \
/\
\
/ / \
\
//
\ / / / / \
\
/ / \ /
\
\ \ / / /
/
\
/
\
\ \ \
/\ /\ \
Recharge
\
/ \ \ / \ \ \
/
1 in/yr
\ /\ /

/
/\
/\
(
!
/ \ / / \
///\\ / \
/
/ / / \ \ /
E T / \
\\
"
"
/ \
\ \\ / \ / / /
// \
\ \ \ \ / \ \ / / /
R
\
/
R E \
/ / \ \ \ / \ \ \
/ /
\NEC-27AE
/
\
\ \ / / / / / \ \ / \
T E
S T / \
/
\ \ \ \ / / \ \ / / \
/ \
Ñ
\ \ / / /
/ / / \ \
S / / / / \ \ \
L I
·
\ \ /
W A
\ / / / \ \ \ / \
E L / \ \ \ / / \
\ /
NEC-PZ-1A
/

\
/ \ \ / /
" NEC-23A
/ \ \ /
" NEC-7A
/
\/\ / \ / /
\
/ /
/
/
\\
/ / \ \
/
//\
\ \ / \ \ / \
\/ \ \ \
475 ELLIS STREET

/ \ \ / \
\/ / /
/\
.
\/ / \ / \
(
!
/
/ / / / / / \ \ / / /
S . F
\\ \
\\
/ \ \ \ \ / \ \ \
//
\

/ \ / \
\\
\ / / / \
/\ /
/\
/
/
/\
/\
/
/ \ / / / \ \
\
\ /
/
\ / /
\
/\ \
/
\ / \ \ / \ \ \

/ / / / \
/ /
Piezometer
/\ \ / \
\ \ / \ \ \
/
\
/ \ / / \ \ / / / /
/ / /\ \ / / / / \ \ \
/
\ / \
\
\ \\ / \ \
/ \ \
/
/ / \
\
\
/
/ /
//\ / \ /
\
/ \ / / / \ /
/ \\ / \ \ \ \ \
/ \ \ \
/
/
\
\ / / / \ / \ / / /
\
\ / / /
\ \ \ / \ / \ \ \ \ \
/ \
Ñ
/ \ \ / /
--------=
____J
/ / / / / \ \ /
\ /
·
\ \ \ \ / \
\ \ / \ / \
L
/ \ / \ /
/ \ / \ /
/ \ / \ \

\ \ \ /
/ / \

N - North
\ \
yr - year
Monitoring Well
U E
Extraction Well
E N
E T
R E
S T
Legend
in - inches
AV
S
L I
ft - feet
(
!
E L
Notes:
"
L
N A
NEC10A
" 15
555A ELLIS STREET
5.0
E T
R E
515 ELLIS STREET

S T
S
NECPZ2A
L I
NECPZ1A 70 ·
51 Ñ· Ñ NECPZ3A
5.1
E L
NEC8A " Ñ·
" NEC22A
83 (
!
NEC28AE 22
"
NEC25A " NEC9A
( 45
! NEC27AE 26 2.7
59
NEC12A
" NEC23A 2.2
"
17
501 ELLIS STREET
NEC7A NEC21A
53
" 0.6
!.. . . . . . . . . . . . .
"
NEC24A "
NEC1A
23 " NEC3A
23
( NS
NEC26A "
!
"
S . F
. W A 21 NEC1AE
T E 21 5.0
R D I S
T R
I C T
NEC11A "
15
475 ELLIS STREET

" NEC20A
<0.5
Legend TCE Concentration Contour Map

Extraction Well
(
! TCE Concentration TCE Concentration Contour (µg/L) 2018 Biennial Groundwater Monitoring Event
³
21
Monitoring Well
TCE Concentration
" 2.2
LHHj 501 Ellis Street Boundary 501 Ellis Street
l'"H"""';
Piezometer Mountain View, California

Ñ·
70 TCE Concentration
Notes:
- TCE concentrations measured in µg/L. Geosyntec e> Figure
NS - Not Sampled
10
TCE - Trichloroethene
consultants
µg/L - micrograms per liter 0 100
D:\GIS\NEC\Project\2019_AnnualReport\Fig10_TCE.mxd 3/13/2020 6:42:09 PM
NEC-11A NEC-1A NEC-26A
100000 100000 100000
10000 10000 10000

Concentration (μg/L)
1000 1000 1000
100 100 100
10 10 10
1 1 1
0.1 0.1 0.1

1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022
Date Date Date

100000 100000 100000
10000 10000 10000

1000 1000 1000
100 100 100
10 10 10
1 1 1
0.1 0.1 0.1

1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022
Date Date Date

100000 100000 100000
10000 10000 10000

1000 1000 1000
100 100 100
10 10 10
1 1 1
0.1 0.1 0.1

1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022
Date Date Date
NEC-7A NEC-23A
100000 100000
10000 10000
1000 1000
100 100
10 10
1 1
0.1 0.1
1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 VOC Concentrations in Groundwater
Date Date
501 Ellis Street
Notes: Monitoring Well 501 Ellis Street Boundary Mountain View, California
Trichloroethene - Open symbols are non-detects, presented at limit of quantification.
VOC - Volatile Organic Compounds Figure
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene μg/L - micrograms per liter
- Imagery provided by USGS
Vinyl Chloride 11
WR2814 April 2020
D:\GIS\NEC\Project\2019_AnnualReport\[Fig11_VOCsinGW_Timeseries.xlsx]
1000
100
10
0.1
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Date
Trichloroethene Vinyl Chloride
Notes: VOC Concentrations in Well NEC-1AE
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Open symbols are non-detects,
presented at limit of quantification. 501 Ellis Street
VOC - volatile organic compound Mountain View, California
1,2-Dichlorobenzene Tetrachloroethene μg/L - micrograms per liter
Figure
Extraction at NEC-1AE Discontinued
WR2814 April 2020
12
D:\GIS\NEC\Project\2019_AnnualReport\[Fig12_NEC1AE_Timeseries.xlsx]
E T
R E
"
NEC-10A
S T
15
S
555A ELLIS STREET
L I
5.0
E L
515 ELLIS STREET
NEC-PZ-2A
NEC-PZ-1A 70
NECPZ3A
51
Ñ Ñ Ñ
·
NEC-8A "
·
·
5.1
NEC-22A
83(
! " " 22
NEC-27AE NEC-28AE
59 NEC-25A
45
"
(
! 26 NEC-9A
2.7
NEC-23A
" 17 "
NEC-12A
501 ELLIS STREET 2.2
NEC-21A
NEC-7A
53 " 0.6
" NEC-24A
23 NEC-3A
" NEC-1A " NS
S . F 23
. W A " (
!
"
5.
T E NEC-26A NEC-1AE 0
R D I S 21 21
T R
I C T
"
NEC-11A
15
Notes:
- TCE concentrations measured in µg/L.
NS - Not Sampled "
TCE - Trichloroethene NEC-20A
µg/L - micrograms per liter <0.5
-Imagery provided by USGS, April 2011
E T
Legend
(
! Extraction Well NEC-11A Decreasing TCE Concentration Trend Analysis
TCE Concentration
³
TCE Concentration Trend
R E
21 15
Monitoring Well
501 Ellis Street
"
2.2
TCE Concentration NEC-7A No Observed
Piezometer Mountain View, California
TCE Concentration Trend
S T
53
Ñ ·
70 TCE Concentration
TCE Concentration NEC-PZ-2A Increasing Geosyntec e> Figure
Contour (µg/L) 70 TCE Contentration Trend
S
13
consultants
r···-·1
, ______ .,, 501 Ellis Street Boundary
L I
0 100
Feet WR2814 April 2020
E L
D:\GIS\NEC\Project\2019_AnnualReport\Fig13_TCETrendv2.mxd 3/13/2020 6:44:18 PM

APPENDIX A
2019 Annual Report Remedy Performance
Checklist

2019 Annual Report Remedy Performance Checklist
I. GENERAL SITE INFORMATION

Facility Name: 501 Ellis Street
Facility Address, City, State: 501 Ellis Street, Mountain View, CA
Checklist completion date: February 3, 2020 I EPA Site ID: CAD980883268 (CERCLIS database)
Site Lead:  Fund  PRP  State  State Enforcement  Federal Facility  Other, specify:
U.S. EPA Region 9
Site Remedy Components (Include Other Reference Documents for More Information, as appropriate): (See Section
4.2.5 “Final, Second Five-Year Report for MEW Superfund Study Area, Mountain View, California.” U.S. EPA
Region 9. September 2009.) Soil Remedy. Excavation and aeration. About 210 cubic yards of soil were
excavated and aerated. 55 cubic yards were reused as backfill on site; the remaining 155 cubic yards were disposed
offsite. Groundwater Remedy. Source control groundwater extraction system consisting of two A zone
groundwater extraction wells, and discharge to City of Mountain View sanitary sewer under City of Mountain View
Wastewater Discharge Permit ID Number 925.
II. CONTACTS
List important personnel associated with the Site: Name, title, phone number, e-mail address:
Name/Title Phone E-mail

PRP / Facility John Jeter, Esq. 408.588.6185 john.jeter@renesas.com
Representative Senior Corporate Counsel
PRP Contractor/ Eric Suchomel, Ph.D., P.E. (CA) 510.285.2786 esuchomel@geosyntec.com
Consultant Geosyntec Consultants
O&M Contractor Africa Espina 650.960.1640 guzuna@locustec.com

Locus Technologies, Inc.
Other N/A N/A N/A
P:\PRJ2003REM\NEC_501 Ellis Street\WR0434\EPA Annual Reports\2019 Annual\Report\Drafts\Client Review\Appendices\Appendix A - 2019 Annual Report
Checklist\AppA_2019_AnnualReportChecklist_MB.docx Page 1
III. O&M COSTS (OPTIONAL)
What is your annual O&M cost total for the reporting year?
Breakout your annual O&M cost total into the following categories (use either dollars or %):
 Analytical (e.g., lab costs):
 Labor (e.g., site maintenance, sampling):
 Materials (e.g., treatment chemicals):
 Oversight (e.g., project management):
 Utilities (e.g., electric, gas, phone, water):
 Reporting (e.g., NPDES, progress):
 Other (e.g., capital improvements):
Describe unanticipated/unusually high or low O&M costs (go to section [fill in] to recommend optimization
methods):
IV. ON-SITE DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS (Check all that apply)
 O&M Manual  O&M Maintenance Logs  O&M As-built drawings  O&M reports
 Daily access/Security logs
 Site-Specific Health & Safety Plan  Contingency/Emergency Response Plan
 O&M/OSHA Training Records  Settlement Monument Records
 Gas Generation Records  Groundwater monitoring records  Leachate extraction records
 Discharge Compliance Records
 Air discharge permit  Effluent discharge permit  Waste disposal, POTW permit
Are these documents currently readily available?  Yes  No If no, where are records kept?
V. INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS (as applicable)

List institutional controls called for (and from what enforcement document): Not applicable
Status of their implementation:
Where are the ICs documented and/or reported?
ICs are being properly implemented and enforced?  Yes  No, elaborate below
ICs are adequate for site protection?  Yes  No, elaborate below
Additional remarks regarding ICs:
VI. SIGNIFICANT SITE EVENTS

Check all Significant Site events Since the Last Checklist that Affects or May Affect Remedy Performance
 Community Issues
 Vandalism
 Maintenance Issues
 Other:
Please elaborate on Significant Site Events:
VII. REDEVELOPMENT
Is redevelopment on property planned?  Yes  No
If yes, what is planned? Please describe below.
Is redevelopment plan complete  Yes, date: _______________________;  No ?  Not Applicable
Redevelopment proposal in progress?  Yes, elaborate below
 No; If no, is a proposal anticipated?  Yes  No
 Is the redevelopment proposal compatible with remedy performance?  Yes  No
VIII. GROUNDWATER REMEDY (reference concentration, capture zone maps, trend analysis, and
other documentation to support analysis)
Groundwater Quality Data
List the types of data that are available: What is the source report?
2019 Annual Progress Report submitted April 2020. Data includes groundwater levels, groundwater elevation
contours and estimated capture zone analyses, groundwater sampling results (lab reports and summary tables) and
trichloroethene (TCE) concentration contour maps, concentration versus time graphs for all monitoring wells, and
Mann-Kendall concentration trend analyses for TCE and cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE) in all sampled
wells.
 Contaminant trend(s) tracked during O&M (i.e., temporal analysis of groundwater contaminant trends).
 Groundwater data tracked with software for temporal analyses.
 Reviewed MNA parameters to ensure health of substrate (e.g., DO, pH, temperature), if appropriate?
Groundwater Pump & Treat Extraction Well and Treatment System Data
2019 Annual Progress Report submitted April 2020. Data includes extraction system operating parameters (e.g.,
flow rates and volumes), operations and maintenance records, and effluent monitoring results per City of
Mountain View reporting requirements. In addition, the progress report documents reports submitted,
investigations performed, and historical and current groundwater elevation and sampling results.
 The system is functioning adequately.

 The system has been shut down for significant periods of time in the past year. Please elaborate below.
Discharge Data
Semi-annual Periodic Report of Continued Compliance (PRCC) was submitted to the City of Mountain View in
January and August, 2019. Data includes results of self-monitoring analysis (flow rates, volumes, effluent
chemistry, etc.) conducted during the second half of 2018 and the first half of 2019.
 The system is in compliance with discharge permits.

Slurry Wall Data NA
Is slurry wall operating as designed?  Yes  No

If not, what is being done to correct the situation?
Elaborate on technical data and/or other comments
IX. AIR MONITORING/VAPOR INTRUSION PATHWAY EVALUATION (Include in Annual Progress

Report and reference document)
In 2012, a vapor intrusion pathway investigation was conducted, including indoor air, outdoor air and sub-slab
vapor sampling. Prior to, and following indoor construction (tenant improvement) activities in 2014, indoor and
outdoor air sampling was conducted by a consultant for the 501 Ellis Street tenant. No vapor intrusion work has
occurred since 2014.
Recommendations/Next Steps:
Additional vapor sampling will be completed following EPA approval of the Revised Site-Wide Vapor Intrusion
Sampling and Analysis Work Plan for Response Action Tiering for the purpose of placing the building into a
final response action tier.
Schedule:
X. REMEDY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

A. Groundwater Remedies
What are the remedial goals for groundwater?  Plume containment (prevent plume migration);  Plume
restoration (attain ROD-specific cleanup levels in aquifer);  Other goals, please explain:
See Source Control discussion, Section C., below.
Have you done a trend analysis?  Yes  No; If Yes, what does it show?
(Is it inconclusive due to inadequate data? Are the concentrations increasing or decreasing?) Explain and provide
source document reference.
Figure 13 of the 2019 Annual Report indicates decreasing TCE concentrations in most monitoring wells. In five
of the wells with decreasing TCE concentrations, cis-1,2-DCE concentrations are increasing, which is indicative
of TCE natural attenuation.
If plume containment is a remedial goal, check all that apply:

 Plume migration is under control (explain basis below)
 Plume migration is not under control (explain basis below)
 Insufficient data to determine plume stability (explain below)
(Include attachments that substantiate your answers, e.g., reference plume, trend analysis, and capture zone maps
in source document)
Elaborate on basis for determining that plume containment goal is being met or not being met:
Capture zone analysis indicates plume is contained (Figures 5 through 9 in the 2019 Annual Report).
If plume restoration is a cleanup objective, check all that apply:

Progress is being made toward reaching cleanup levels (explain basis below)
 Progress is not being made toward reaching cleanup levels (explain basis below)
 Insufficient data to determine progress toward restoration goal (explain below)
Elaborate on basis for determining progress or lack of progress toward restoration goal:
TCE concentrations within the plume are decreasing (Figure 11 and 13 in the 2019 Annual Report)
B. Vertical Migration
Have you done an assessment of vertical gradients?  Yes  No; If Yes, what does it show? (Is it inconclusive
due to inadequate data? Are the concentrations increasing or decreasing? Explain and provide source document
reference)
Vertical gradients were assessed in 1995. The vertical gradients were assessed between the A and B1 units, B1
and B2 units, and B2 and B3 units. Gradients in 16 of 17 well pairs were upward. Gradient in the deeper B2-B3
well pair was downward.
C. Source Control Remedies
What are the remedial goals for source control?

Containment by pumping.
Elaborate on basis for determining progress or lack of progress toward these goals:
On-site capture is achieved through two extraction wells, NEC27AE and NEC28AE, and TCE concentration
trends are generally decreasing.
XI. PROJECTIONS
Administrative Issues
Dates of next monitoring and sampling events for next annual reporting period:
A. Groundwater Remedies - Projections for the upcoming year and long-term (Check all that apply)
Remedy Projections for the upcoming year (2020)
 No significant changes projected.
 Groundwater remedy will be converted to monitored natural attenuation. Target date:
 Groundwater Pump & Treat will be shut down. Target date:
 Groundwater cleanup standards to be modified. Target date:
 PRP will request remedy modification. Target date of request:
 Change in the number of monitoring wells.  Increasing or  decreasing? Target date:
 Change in the number and/or types of analytes being analyzed.  Increasing or  decreasing?
Target date:
 Change in groundwater extraction system. Expansion or minimization (i.e., number of extraction wells and/or
pumping rate)? Target date:
 Modification on groundwater treatment? Elaborate below. Target date:
 Change in discharge location. Target date:
 Other modification(s) anticipated:____________________ Elaborate below. Target date:
Elaborate on Remedy Projections:
Remedy Projections for the long-term (Check all that apply)

 No significant changes projected.
 Groundwater remedy will be converted to monitored natural attenuation. Target date:
 Groundwater Pump & Treat will be shut down. Target date:
 Groundwater cleanup standards to be modified. Target date:
 Change in the number and/or types of analytes being analyzed.  Increasing or  decreasing?
Target date:
 Change in groundwater extraction system. Expansion or minimization (i.e., number of extraction wells and/or
pumping rate)? Target date:
 Modification on groundwater treatment? Elaborate below. Target date:
 Change in discharge location. Target date:
 Other modification(s) anticipated:____________________ Elaborate below. Target date:
B. Projections – Slurry Walls (Check all that apply) – N/A

Remedy Projections for the upcoming year (2020)
 No significant changes projected.

 Other modification(s) anticipated:_____________________ Elaborate below. Target date:
Remedy Projections for the long-term

 No significant changes projected.
 Other modification(s) anticipated:_____________________ Elaborate below. Target date:
C. Projections – Other Remedial Options Being Reviewed to Enhance Cleanup

Progress implementing recommendations from last report or Five-Year Review
Has optimization study been implemented or scheduled?  Yes;  No; If Yes, please elaborate.
Modifications to the SCGWR system to allow discharge to the City of Mountain View sanitary sewer were
completed in May 2009 and discharge to the sanitary sewer was started. Extraction well NEC-01AE was shut
down, and the target flow rates at extraction wells NEC-27AE and NEC-28AE were set to nominal values of 2.0
gpm.
XII. ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

Check all that apply:
 Explanation of Significant Differences in progress  ROD Amendment in progress

 Site in operational and functional ("shake down") period;
 Notice of Intent to Delete in progress  Partial site deletion in progress  TI Waivers
 Other administrative issues:
Date of Next Five-Year Review: 2024
XII. RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on performance of the current remedy, continued implementation of the optimized remedy is
recommended.
In March 2016, EPA conditionally approved the Request for Reduction in Groundwater Monitoring Frequency,
allowing a trial reduction in sampling frequency from an annual to biennial basis. The frequency of monitoring at
NEC-1AE will be reduced to a biennial schedule matching the rest of the Site monitoring wells.
APPENDIX B
Capture Zone Calculations

APPENDIX B - CALCULATIONS FOR CAPTURE ZONE ANALYSIS
The 2019 capture zone analysis was conducted using two methodologies: the Javandel and Tsang (1987)1
methodology and a site-specific numerical model. Both methodologies require the same input parameters to
estimate the capture zones of the groundwater extraction wells. The input parameters used in the numerical
model were evaluated during the fourth quarter 2004 and are consistent with the current understanding of the
Site conditions. Other than average quarterly pumping rates by extraction wells, input parameters were
unchanged in 2019.
Pumping Rate
The average quarterly pumping rates during 2019 for the two operating extraction wells at 501 Ellis Street are
summarized below:
Average Average
Quarterly Flow Quarterly Flow
Quarter Well Average Monthly Flow (gpm) Q (gpm) Q (ft3/day)
27AE 1.24 1.63 2.13 1.67 321
1
28AE 2.06 2.03 2.06 2.05 395
27AE 1.72 1.98 1.96 1.89 363

2
28AE 2.00 1.97 1.94 1.97 379
27AE 1.82 1.91 1.86 1.86 359

3
28AE 1.97 1.87 1.96 1.93 372
27AE 1.83 1.77 1.74 1.78 343

4
28AE 1.97 2.08 2.05 2.03 391
Hydraulic Gradient
The hydraulic gradient, i, was calculated using the November 2004 regional potentiometric surface in the
vicinity of the Site from Weiss Associates (2004)2.
-□
5 ft ft
i  0.008
625 ft ft
Aquifer Thickness
The aquifer thickness, B, was assumed to be uniform and 20 feet. The interlayered heterogeneities of the A
aquifer are treated as a single unit extending from 10 to 30 feet below ground surface.
Transmissivity
1
Javandel and Tsang (1987). Groundwater, Vol. 25, No. 5. pp. 616-625.
2
Weiss Associates, 2004. Draft A/A1 Aquifer (South) Groundwater Elevations and Estimated Capture Zones. 18
November.
Page 1
P:\PRJ2003REM\NEC_501 Ellis Street\WR0434\EPA Annual Reports\2019 Annual\Report\Drafts\Client Review\Appendices\Appendix B - Capture Zone
Calculations\Draft_AppB_CaptureZoneCalcs_2019.docx
Transmissivity (T) was measured by Bechtel (1996) in monitoring wells NEC-12A, NEC-22A, and NEC-25A.
3
Well T (ft2/day) Average T in each well
NEC-12A 6.5 6.5

35
NEC-22A 28.0
21
188
NEC-25A 239.5
291
Average T 91.3 ft2/day
Hydraulic Conductivity
The hydraulic conductivity, K, is calculated from the transmissivity, T, and aquifer thickness as follows:
T 91.3 ft 2 / day
K = = 4.6 ft/day
B 20 ft
The input parameters for the Javandel and Tsang methodology, as well as the numerical model are summarized
as follows:
Quarter Parameter Well NEC-27AE Well NEC-28AE

1 Q (ft3/day) 321 395
2 Q (ft /day)
3
363 379
3 Q (ft3/day) 359 372
4 Q (ft /day)
3
343 391
All B (ft) 20 20
All K (ft/day) 4.6 4.6
All i (ft/ft) 0.008 0.008
Javandel and Tsang Methodology
From Javandel and Tsang, the stagnation point for each extraction well was calculated using the expression:
Q
Xs 
2BKi
3
Bechtel, 1996. Source Control Groundwater Remediation Final Design, 501 Ellis Street, Mountain View. 26
August.
Page 2
where: Xs = distance to stagnation point (ft)
Q = pumping rate (ft3/day)
B = saturated aquifer thickness (ft)
K = hydraulic conductivity (ft/day)
i = hydraulic gradient (ft/ft)
Using this equation and the above input parameters, the distance to stagnation points for the two wells, in feet,
are:
Quarter NEC-27AE NEC-28AE
1 69.4 85.4
2 78.6 82.1
3 77.6 80.5
4 74.1 84.7
Third quarter capture zones calculated using the Javandel and Tsang methodology are shown in Figure 5.
Page 3
APPENDIX C
2019 Laboratory Analytical Reports

♦
ENTHALPY
ANALYTICAL
Enthalpy Analytical
2323 Fifth Street, Berkeley, CA 94710, Phone (510) 486-0900
Laboratory Job Number 307905
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Locus Technologies Project : 98007-99-2200

299 Fairchild Dr. Location : NEC
Mountain View, CA 94043 Level : II
Sample ID Lab ID
271NEC-EFT 307905-001
TRIP BLANK 307905-002
This data package has been reviewed for technical correctness and completeness.
Release of this data has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or the
Manager's designee, as verified by the following signature which applies to
this PDF file as well as any associated electronic data deliverable files. The
results contained in this report meet all requirements of NELAP and pertain
only to those samples which were submitted for analysis. This report may be
reproduced only in its entirety.
Signature: Date: 03/12/2019

Haley Campbell
Project Manager
haley.campbell@enthalpy.com
CA ELAP# 2896, NELAP# 4044-001
1 of 13
r--~ENTHALPY
~..J ANALYTICAL
CASE NARRATIVE
Laboratory number: 307905

Client: Locus Technologies
Project: 98007-99-2200
Location: NEC
Request Date: 03/05/19
Samples Received: 03/05/19
This data package contains sample and QC results for two water samples,
requested for the above referenced project on 03/05/19. The samples were
received cold and intact.
Volatile Organics by GC/MS (EPA 624):

No analytical problems were encountered.
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) (SM2540C):

Page 1 of 1
11.0
2 of 13
it.ocus CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY.- RECORD
• TECHNOLOGIES
5)7 qa:s-- .
(See Reverse for Instructions)
SERIAL NO.
1513'-f
PROJECT NAME -----'---"""-...-C'----- SAMPLERS .J/ell tY C,,.3 -1-~ 7 v;
.__,-(PRINT}
SAMPLE CONTAINER
DESCRIPTION CODES
!~MPLE DESCRIPTION CODES ~ A T CODES
' round Water F. Oil -,
PROJECTNUMBER_.J-_:,L...::....:.-L.-~---""l~...:...M'- A,_A0-ml VOA Vial . Surface Water G. Waste 1 tandard
(SIGN) --Elass Liter~O E. Brass Tube C. Leachate ~lank/Spike 2. 48 Hour
,n-lastic ~,,.,IF. Other D. Rinseate '-I'." Other 3. 24 Hour
E. Soil/Sediment __ - _-_-_-_-_ 4. Other _ __
. Plastic Liter
.... " '.8 I NUMBER OF , ANALYSIS REQUESTED LABORATORY USE ONLY
ANALYTICAL LAB lid:_

i 8
~
!
~
\j
CONTAINERS
AND f g> j
:;.-g :;.-L---------=-=-=--------i
.c
2- 2-
g
.c
LAB PROJECT NO.
~ i
PRESERVATION
1 I :s i
isl ~ ~
----------~-------------~------------f1 .~a~
. ~
ii
I E""
"ea: e -giL--======;=...-----,--;:~~;;--;~,
m
r I I I I l ~ l~ g i
·c: _5i=i g :!
AVERAG~
C:
'U
:,
0-
a:"
.
>< .c
;;
:;; :;;
(/)
1E io
c(
SAMPLE
ASSIGNED·
CONDITION
NOTES BOTTLE
NO. I DATE I TIME I SAMPLE ID

TEMP
·c
COND
microrrhos/cm
I pH I i : :)
~
r/l Jl
il
ii: I ~
\J \I a .,i z NUMBERS
UPON
RECEIPT
~
3
f-i-'~Jf;fgl.A~/_fV~C-{_F'C I
.N.1"/2 1---TFi!it2 B1t11tk_~_
I
c
~~,I 13 1I ~ 11111111
~lir r 131 1 ~
±1 j I I I
1 , 1
•
4 1
5 I
w 1/V/'A-1
I I
·nn:,,,
r
a1a}'t 1" 1 lf"IYll I'>( ~
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
NOTE~S
/ Ml~C=OUS [Field/ Container Temp. Received By: (Signature) Date Time
1k~gnature)
Temperalln ID be ftll8Slftd IIICI recorded Relinquished f!: (Signature) Received By: (Signature) Date Time
~ upon receipt GI samples at lab. H:. c; 0 c _

Relinquished By: (Signature) Received By: (Signature) Date Time
Container Sealed with Custody Seal: Yes D No □
Method of Shipment [ Description of Other Chains-of-Custody Dispatched By: (Signature) Date Time Received for lab By: (Signature) Date Time
...
Transport Container Transported with this
Chain (by Serial No.)
VILU 3-~Lo/ I/.✓ -oo

,-2. I //'/
(__/(_ ''3' '7
_,/
~w
A/' ,- r {) r
Send Lab Results to (Name): /Vit.lt1L¥ J ee,11 rr-e, t-e 3levre .,,., (Check ice B ~ 0 ~!~!{_Requ~ed: Yes D No D
□ MOUNTAIN VIEW• 299 FAIRCHILobRIVE • MTN VIEW, CA 94043 • TEL ( f969) 0 • FA~0)~-07~ 5,~ r-r.:rJcJ
□ WALNUT CREEK• 1701 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD• WALNUT CREEK, CA 94
B ~~~::MENTO• 1100 MELODY LANE• ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 • TEL (9)

~ L (925) 906-~ • FAX(92~) 906-81
677-1751 • FAX
TEL (916)
__ 677-1760
~
_ _ FAX _ __,_,._ __
~\\~\-\\
"V ,'-\-
3 of 13
REV.6/02
WHITE: Laboratory Copy YELLOW: Project Copy PINK: Database Copy
SAMtLE RECEIPl'CHECICUST
· - 1 : lalfn•
Data Raalvad:
jQ1Jiru ·t; l-j
Ol1nt: _ _ _
Project:
______
___c_D}
LD
s.tlDII Z: Samples recalvad In a coaler? 11, how many? \ CjNo (lldp Sadlall s bllaw)
If no c:oolar5ample usq IR Gun#' □ A. or C B
a samples~!
Temp
>
re):____
Jee directly from the field~ t.oa11111 process had b ~
If In caolar: Data Opened .1S.LJ..'l By (print) kc (slcn),__ _
,
,_~----=---
Shlppq Info (lf applcable} . ,
Are custady _ . present? ~or □ Yes. If yes, where? [] Ql1 cooler, [] on samples, C on.paclcqe
a Data: _ _ _ _ How many _ _ _ □ SIJnatu~, □ lnltlals, □ None
w.. ,als Intact u arrival? □ Yes C No i
I: lmportant:NadfyPMlf.. ..,.....u _..&-cararllvefrallln.
Paddna In caoler: (If odNlr., describe) / ·.
a Bubble Wrap., a foam blades, a Bags, ~one, □ Oath material, □ Cardboard, □ 9.yrofoam, □ Paper~
□ Samples ntmlvad on Ice dJNCl:IV from the 11.ad. CooDna procm had besun , · .
e of Ice used : B1Nat, □ Blue/Gel, □ None Temperature blanlc(s) ~ ~□ No
amperatln mauurad uslna □ Thennometer ID:_ _ _ _ _ __, or IR Gun# a A B"f'"
C.OOW Ti . · · #2: #3: . #4: #$: #6: 17:
cated tests?
late?
res?
reserved? If N the rest of section

Did dl8dc _ _._.....,,_for all battles for each sam e?
Did you document~ preservative check? I
pH strip lot# _ _ _ ___, pH strip lot#. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ., JH strip lot# _ _ _ _ __

Preservative added: I
a H2504 lot# added to samples ·an/at
C HO.lotl________ .tdedto • m p l e s - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - o n / a t -------t
a HN03 led
□ NaOH lot#
added.ta samples
added to sam es
m,/at.
at · -------
SactJDnl:
Explanatlons/COnvnents: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _;.-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____.,.
By(prlnt} _ _ ___.____.....,__ (ll&nt _ _ _p;.:::::::::::=--

By(prlnt) ,. . ., _ _ _ ___
h==:
Enthalpy~·~ Rev.25, 02/02flJJJB

4 of 13
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL
Detections Summary for 307905
Results for any subcontracted analyses are not included in this summary.
Client : Locus Technologies

Project : 98007-99-2200
Location : NEC
Client Sample ID : 271NEC-EFT Laboratory Sample ID : 307905-001
Analyte Result Flags RL Units Basis IDF Method Prep Method

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.7 0.5 ug/L As Recd 1.000 EPA 624 EPA 624
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 21 0.5 ug/L As Recd 1.000 EPA 624 EPA 624
Trichloroethene 54 1.0 ug/L As Recd 2.000 EPA 624 EPA 624
Total Dissolved Solids I 750 I I 10 I
mg/L I
TOTAL I
1.000 I
SM2540C I
METHOD I
Client Sample ID : TRIP BLANK Laboratory Sample ID : 307905-002
No Detections
Page 1 of 1 14.0
5 of 13
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL
Enthalpy Analytical - Berkeley Analytical Report
Lab #: 307905 Location: NEC

Client: Locus Technologies Prep: EPA 624
Project#: 98007-99-2200 Analysis: EPA 624
Field ID: 271NEC-EFT Units: ug/L
Lab ID: 307905-001 Sampled: 03/04/19
Matrix: Water Received: 03/05/19
Analyte Result RL Diln Fac Batch# Analyzed

Chloromethane ND 1.0 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Vinyl Chloride ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Bromomethane ND 1.0 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Chloroethane ND 1.0 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1.0 1.000 268441 03/08/19
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Methylene Chloride ND 10 1.000 268441 03/08/19
MTBE ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.7 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 21 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Chloroform ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Carbon Tetrachloride ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Benzene ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Trichloroethene 54 1.0 2.000 268494 03/11/19
1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Bromodichloromethane ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Toluene ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Tetrachloroethene ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Dibromochloromethane ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Chlorobenzene ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Ethylbenzene ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Bromoform ND 1.0 1.000 268441 03/08/19
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.5 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Surrogate %REC Limits Diln Fac Batch# Analyzed

Dibromofluoromethane 103 80-121 1.000 268441 03/08/19
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 97 80-134 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Toluene-d8 93 80-120 1.000 268441 03/08/19
Bromofluorobenzene 99 80-120 1.000 268441 03/08/19
ND= Not Detected

RL= Reporting Limit
Page 1 of 1 5.0
6 of 13
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL

Field ID: TRIP BLANK Batch#: 268441
Lab ID: 307905-002 Sampled: 03/04/19
Units: ug/L Analyzed: 03/08/19
Diln Fac: 1.000
Analyte Result RL
Chloromethane ND 1.0
Vinyl Chloride ND 0.5
Bromomethane ND 1.0
Chloroethane ND 1.0
Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1.0
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 0.5
Methylene Chloride ND 10
MTBE ND 0.5
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.5
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.5
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.5
Chloroform ND 0.5
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.5
Carbon Tetrachloride ND 0.5
Benzene ND 0.5
Trichloroethene ND 0.5
1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.5
Bromodichloromethane ND 0.5
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.5
Toluene ND 0.5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.5
Tetrachloroethene ND 0.5
Dibromochloromethane ND 0.5
Chlorobenzene ND 0.5
Ethylbenzene ND 0.5
Bromoform ND 1.0
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.5
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.5
Surrogate %REC Limits
Dibromofluoromethane 107 80-121
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 97 80-134
Toluene-d8 93 80-120
Bromofluorobenzene 101 80-120
ND= Not Detected

RL= Reporting Limit
Page 1 of 1 6.0
7 of 13
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL
Batch QC Report
Type: BLANK Diln Fac: 1.000
Lab ID: QC967563 Batch#: 268441
Matrix: Water Analyzed: 03/08/19
Units: ug/L
Analyte Result RL
Bromomethane ND 1.0
Chloroethane ND 1.0
MTBE ND 0.5
Chloroform ND 0.5
Benzene ND 0.5
Toluene ND 0.5
Ethylbenzene ND 0.5
Bromoform ND 1.0
ND= Not Detected

RL= Reporting Limit
Page 1 of 1 7.0
8 of 13
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL
Batch QC Report

Matrix: Water Batch#: 268441
Diln Fac: 1.000
Type: BS Lab ID: QC967564
Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits

1,1-Dichloroethene 15.00 14.79 99 65-133
Benzene 15.00 15.75 105 75-122
Trichloroethene 15.00 14.70 98 73-121
Toluene 15.00 14.21 95 78-120
Chlorobenzene 15.00 14.63 98 80-120

Type: BSD Lab ID: QC967565
Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits RPD Lim

1,1-Dichloroethene 15.00 14.12 94 65-133 5 23
Benzene 15.00 15.68 105 75-122 0 20
Trichloroethene 15.00 14.68 98 73-121 0 20
Toluene 15.00 13.90 93 78-120 2 20
Chlorobenzene 15.00 14.45 96 80-120 1 20

RPD= Relative Percent Difference

Page 1 of 1 8.0
9 of 13
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL
Batch QC Report
Lab ID: QC967800 Batch#: 268494
Units: ug/L
Analyte Result RL
Bromomethane ND 1.0
Chloroethane ND 1.0
MTBE ND 0.5
Chloroform ND 0.5
Benzene ND 0.5
Toluene ND 0.5
Ethylbenzene ND 0.5
Bromoform ND 1.0
ND= Not Detected

RL= Reporting Limit
Page 1 of 1 9.0
10 of 13
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL
Batch QC Report

Diln Fac: 1.000

1,1-Dichloroethene 15.00 15.87 106 65-133
Benzene 15.00 16.30 109 75-122
Toluene 15.00 13.83 92 78-120
Chlorobenzene 15.00 14.21 95 80-120


1,1-Dichloroethene 15.00 15.76 105 65-133 1 23
Benzene 15.00 16.09 107 75-122 1 20
Toluene 15.00 13.62 91 78-120 2 20
Chlorobenzene 15.00 14.17 94 80-120 0 20


Page 1 of 1 10.0
11 of 13
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Client: Locus Technologies Prep: METHOD
Project#: 98007-99-2200 Analysis: SM2540C
Analyte: Total Dissolved Solids Batch#: 268380
Field ID: 271NEC-EFT Sampled: 03/04/19
Units: mg/L Prepared: 03/06/19
Diln Fac: 1.000 Analyzed: 03/07/19
Type Lab ID Result RL

SAMPLE 307905-001 750 10
BLANK QC967327 ND 10
ND= Not Detected

RL= Reporting Limit
Page 1 of 1 3.0
12 of 13
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL
Batch QC Report
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Client: Locus Technologies Prep: METHOD
Project#: 98007-99-2200 Analysis: SM2540C
Analyte: Total Dissolved Solids Batch#: 268380
Field ID: ZZZZZZZZZZ Sampled: 02/28/19
MSS Lab ID: 307779-002 Received: 03/01/19
Matrix: Water Prepared: 03/06/19
Units: mg/L Analyzed: 03/07/19
Diln Fac: 1.000
Type Lab ID MSS Result Spiked Result RL %REC Limits RPD Lim
BS QC967328 90.20 86.00 95 80-121
BSD QC967329 90.20 88.00 98 80-121 2 5
SDUP QC967330 1,054 1,052 10.00 0 5
RL= Reporting Limit

Page 1 of 1 4.0
13 of 13
♦
ENTHALPY
ANALYTICAL
Enthalpy Analytical
2323 Fifth Street, Berkeley, CA 94710, Phone (510) 486-0900
Laboratory Job Number 307897
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Locus Technologies Project : 98007-99-2200

299 Fairchild Dr. Location : NEC
Mountain View, CA 94043 Level : II
Sample ID Lab ID
271 NEC-01AE 307897-001
DUPLICATE 307897-002
This data package has been reviewed for technical correctness and completeness.
Release of this data has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or the
Manager's designee, as verified by the following signature which applies to
this PDF file as well as any associated electronic data deliverable files. The
results contained in this report meet all requirements of NELAP and pertain
only to those samples which were submitted for analysis. This report may be
reproduced only in its entirety.
Signature: Date: 03/11/2019

Haley Campbell
Project Manager
haley.campbell@enthalpy.com
CA ELAP# 2896, NELAP# 4044-001
1 of 9
r--~ENTHALPY
~..J ANALYTICAL
CASE NARRATIVE
Laboratory number: 307897

Client: Locus Technologies
Project: 98007-99-2200
Location: NEC
Request Date: 03/05/19
Samples Received: 03/05/19
This data package contains sample and QC results for two water samples,
requested for the above referenced project on 03/05/19. The samples were
received cold and intact.
Volatile Organics by GC/MS (EPA 8260B):

Page 1 of 1
6.0
2 of 9
♦I. DCUS 23)1 ~l SERIAL NO.
~ TECHNOLOGIES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD (See Reverse for Instructions) 1513~
. . ·---- ........ _ A/E _, ..... --· ..... Jle/lrY
/"t ~,f1:~(Jj-, SAMPLE CONTAINER ~MPLE DESCRIPTION CODES TAT CODES
9 f-0&7 - '7 Z-J.~

CXPRIND
DESCRIPTION CODES round Water F. Oil
PROJECT NUMBER ~0-ml VOA Vial urface Water G. Waste ~andard
(SIGN) E. Brass Tube C. Leachate H. Blank/Spike Hour
Glass Liter
RECORDER?lt- F Other _ _ _ D. Rinseate I. Other _ _ _ 3. 24 Hour
C. Plastic 500-ml
E. Soil/Sediment 4. Other _ _
( N) D. Plastic Liter
II NUMBER OF
CONTAINERS
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
".,, i~ll LABORATORY USE ONLY
F4
0 GI
:.(
ANALYTICAL LAB
AND u "' .,, .s: .s:
li PRESERVATION
- ~ ~
C
.,,. Ug- ....

:2 11
. .,
GI ~~
0
0
..
U
LAB PROJECT NO.
iC
s a·t:
15
1l
~
i 1~ .!.
..,. Ha: ~!! .,,l

1ii
- C.
.., AVERAGE 8. Ii
..
,.
~
0
Z
:r::
n
..J
0
:r::
i~ ::,
Ei=°&
·= i .. < ASSIGNED·
SAMPLE
NO. DATE TIME SAMPLE ID

TEMP
oc
COND
micromhoeJcm
pH
a.
~
<fl
Q
!
I
C.
C
:::, !~
£~
a:
GI
~
::; :ii -C. 0
E o
Jl z
> NOTES BOTTLE
NUMBERS
CONDITION
UPON
RECEIPT
1 3-/..J-,j ~ 1.:v-15 ::2. 71 lvGr-t>JAE 4 IA .5 ><
2 ?,-i.{-fQ K/A ·r, ..;/Ji, ·,·r1.k .4 IA ·1 I><
I
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 .,..
13
14
15
16
NOTES/ MISCELLANEOUS Field/ Container Temp. Relinch~gnature) Received By: (Signature) Date Time
- I~ ,,,,
Relinquished Efy: (Signature) Received By: (Signature) Date Time
Relinquished By: (Signature) Received By: (Signature) Date Time

Container Sealed with Custody Seal: Yes D No □
Method of Shipment Description of Other Chains-of-Custody Dispatched By: (Signature) Date Time Received for lab By: (Signature) Date Time
/
l;700
o/l~ >--119
-~
/3:co
/1 -~
----
~'")
/1/~rc ~ ·T,e,/t ,'-e. te .Jevre,.

' ---_Jr:
0 WALNUT CREEK• 1701 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD• WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 • TEL (925) 906-8100 • FAX (925) 906-81-i -'7 I ~~L ~l"I\I!
0
0
SACRAMENTO• 1100 MELODY LANE• ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 • TEL (916) 677-1751 • FAX (916) 677-1760
OTHER _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ TEL _ _ _ _ FAX _ _ _ __ ~ 11-"( \\.,\. y
3 of 9
REV.6/02
WHrTE: LabcratoryCopy YELLOW: Project Copy PINK: Database Copy
Cllant: _ _ _ _ __
LO(_....M
Project:
111n ma1er: o.t1t0pwc

~!-
s.tlDIIZ: 5amp181,.. _ Ina caallr?
If no caaler5ample Temp re):___ _
□ 5lmplls
1_?~ By(prlntl
Shippq Info (If applicable)
11, haw many?
kr_
\
.
CjND (llllps.llall ,....,
usq IR Gun #I □ A, er Cl B
dlrectly from the field~ 'r..0011111 pracess had~
(NJ',_)
I
_ _ ___'
...,.f=--<
=--_·_·-
Ant a.mad¥_. prm■nt? EtNi('ar Cl Yes. If yes, where? C Ql1 cooler, Cl on samples, Don paclcaae
a Dia: _ _ _ _ How ffllllY _ _ □ Sllnatu~ lnltllls, □ Nam □
w.. ... Intact u arrival? □ Vas C No
!I: IMpo,ftlfft:,_ .,,PMltm....... __.rc_. .... frmln.
Packlnlla caalar:(lf DIM"1desc:rlbe) ~ ·
a Mlbla w... a roam blades, a 1ap, □
13fbttt,
0oth matllrlal, □ ciardbaard, a St-,aom-n. a PapartaM!ls
□ ~ ntatlvadon lcedlra:tlVframtheflf!ld. Coatna pracass had beflUII , · ..
• af Jca usm : B"\¥111;, a Bka/GIII, □ No,- Temperature blanlc(s) lnc:ludlJll- ~ □ No
._...... mwurad mini □ 'ffwmomlW ID· orlR Gun I □ A ~
c.oallrli 11: . · 12: #3: . #4: #$: 16: 17:
Dlltr.
? If
dllldc----~ forlll baa:1111 farHCh am
Did you dDcummt ¥D11r praservarJve check? ~
pH strip lotlt _ _ _ _ _ pH strip lat#. _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _H strip lolt _ _ _ _ __
..,...,,._lldda ll:
a H2504 lotl
a HO.led
----- - added to •mples
•mples
----- ----- --'an/at
----- -~
an/at ....-·-·------- 1
an/at ----- --t
added to
□ HNCII kd added.to samples
□ NIIOH led added to am at ·
Sacllanl:
~
----- ----- ---+ ----- ----- ----.. .
8Y(lll'lntt_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,.....,_ __,__ _ ___
By(prtntl ,. ., _ _ __,_~==---
EnlhalpynlWlk:al-......, llav.25, m/02flDJa
4 of 9
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL
Detections Summary for 307897
Results for any subcontracted analyses are not included in this summary.
Client : Locus Technologies

Project : 98007-99-2200
Location : NEC
Client Sample ID : 271 NEC-01AE Laboratory Sample ID : 307897-001

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.5 0.5 ug/L As Recd 1.000 EPA 8260B EPA 5030B
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 26 0.5 ug/L As Recd 1.000 EPA 8260B EPA 5030B
Trichloroethene I 20 I I 0.5 I
ug/L I
As Recd I
1.000 I
EPA 8260B EPA 5030B
Client Sample ID : DUPLICATE Laboratory Sample ID : 307897-002

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.9 0.5 ug/L As Recd 1.000 EPA 8260B EPA 5030B
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 29 0.5 ug/L As Recd 1.000 EPA 8260B EPA 5030B
Trichloroethene 21 0.5 ug/L As Recd 1.000 EPA 8260B EPA 5030B
1,2-Dichlorobenzene I 0.5 I I 0.5 I
ug/L I
As Recd I
1.000 I
EPA 8260B EPA 5030B
Page 1 of 1 9.0
5 of 9
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL
Volatile Organics
Client: Locus Technologies Prep: EPA 5030B
Project#: 98007-99-2200 Analysis: EPA 8260B
Field ID: 271 NEC-01AE Batch#: 268441
Lab ID: 307897-001 Sampled: 03/04/19
Diln Fac: 1.000
Analyte Result RL
Bromomethane ND 1.0
Chloroethane ND 1.0
Freon 113 ND 2.0
MTBE ND 0.5
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.5 0.5
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 26 0.5
Chloroform ND 0.5
Benzene ND 0.5
Trichloroethene 20 0.5
Toluene ND 0.5
Ethylbenzene ND 0.5
m,p-Xylenes ND 0.5
o-Xylene ND 0.5
Bromoform ND 0.5
ND= Not Detected

RL= Reporting Limit
Page 1 of 1 2.0
6 of 9
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL
Volatile Organics
Field ID: DUPLICATE Batch#: 268441
Lab ID: 307897-002 Sampled: 03/04/19
Diln Fac: 1.000
Analyte Result RL
Bromomethane ND 1.0
Chloroethane ND 1.0
Freon 113 ND 2.0
MTBE ND 0.5
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.9 0.5
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 29 0.5
Chloroform ND 0.5
Benzene ND 0.5
Trichloroethene 21 0.5
Toluene ND 0.5
Ethylbenzene ND 0.5
m,p-Xylenes ND 0.5
o-Xylene ND 0.5
Bromoform ND 0.5
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.5 0.5
ND= Not Detected

RL= Reporting Limit
Page 1 of 1 3.0
7 of 9
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL
Batch QC Report
Volatile Organics
Lab ID: QC967563 Batch#: 268441
Units: ug/L
Analyte Result RL
Bromomethane ND 1.0
Chloroethane ND 1.0
Freon 113 ND 2.0
MTBE ND 0.5
Chloroform ND 0.5
Benzene ND 0.5
Toluene ND 0.5
Ethylbenzene ND 0.5
m,p-Xylenes ND 0.5
o-Xylene ND 0.5
Bromoform ND 0.5
ND= Not Detected

RL= Reporting Limit
Page 1 of 1 4.0
8 of 9
,..,~ENTHALPY
~_J ANALYTICAL
Batch QC Report
Volatile Organics
Diln Fac: 1.000

1,1-Dichloroethene 15.00 14.79 99 65-133
MTBE 15.00 13.43 90 66-124
Benzene 15.00 15.75 105 75-122
Toluene 15.00 14.21 95 78-120
Chlorobenzene 15.00 14.63 98 80-120
Ethylbenzene 15.00 14.13 94 78-120
m,p-Xylenes 30.00 28.71 96 79-122
o-Xylene 15.00 14.54 97 80-120

1,1-Dichloroethene 15.00 14.12 94 65-133 5 23
MTBE 15.00 13.85 92 66-124 3 20
Benzene 15.00 15.68 105 75-122 0 20
Toluene 15.00 13.90 93 78-120 2 20
Chlorobenzene 15.00 14.45 96 80-120 1 20
Ethylbenzene 15.00 14.01 93 78-120 1 20
m,p-Xylenes 30.00 28.52 95 79-122 1 20
o-Xylene 15.00 14.70 98 80-120 1 20

Page 1 of 1 5.0
9 of 9
.;; eurofins ■12
Environment Testing
3
TestAmerica
4
5
ANALYTICAL REPORT
6
Eurofins TestAmerica, Pleasanton
1220 Quarry Lane 7
Pleasanton, CA 94566
Tel: (925)484-1919 8
Laboratory Job ID: 720-93627-1 9
Client Project/Site: NEC
Revision: 1 10
For: 11
Locus Technologies
299 Fairchild Drive 12
Mountain View, California 94043
13
Attn: Nancy-Jeanne LeFevre
14
15
Authorized for release by:
7/18/2019 11:23:31 AM
Nathaniel Horner, Project Management Assistant I
nathaniel.horner@testamericainc.com
Designee for
Micah Smith, Project Manager II
(925)484-1919
micah.smith@testamericainc.com
·· ·· ·········· LINKS ........... .
Review your project

results through
TotalAccess
Have a Question.
. ,
k This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is
The
~ intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Ex ert Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
Visit us at:
www.testamericainc.com
Client: Locus Technologies Laboratory Job ID: 720-93627-1 1
Project/Site: NEC
2
Table of Contents 3
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4
Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 7
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8
8
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 9
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
10
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 11
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 12
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
17
13
Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14
15

Page 2 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)
Definitions/Glossary 1
Client: Locus Technologies Job ID: 720-93627-1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Glossary
Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
3
¤ Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
%R Percent Recovery
4
CFL Contains Free Liquid
CNF Contains No Free Liquid 5
DER Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac Dilution Factor 6
DL Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample 7
DLC Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)
EDL Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin) 8
LOD Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)
LOQ Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE) 9
MDA Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)
MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry) 10
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
NC Not Calculated
11
ND Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
12
QC Quality Control
RER Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry) 13
RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points 14
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin) 15
Page 3 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)

Case Narrative 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Job ID: 720-93627-1 3
Laboratory: Eurofins TestAmerica, Pleasanton
4
Narrative
Job Narrative 5
720-93627-1
6
Revision 1
This report was revised on 7/18/19 in order to remove a nonconformance that did not apply to this job. 7
Comments
No additional comments. 8
Receipt 9
The sample was received on 6/20/2019 12:50 PM; the sample arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice.
The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 4.3º C. 10
GC/MS VOA
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
11
General Chemistry 12
13
14
15

Page 4 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)
Detection Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Client Sample ID: 272NEC-EFT Lab Sample ID: 720-93627-1
3
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
- - -
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
- - -
6.5
- - - -
0.50
- - -
ug/L
- -
1
- -
624
- - -
Total/NA 4
Trichloroethene 57 0.50 ug/L 1 624 Total/NA
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 22 0.50 ug/L 1 624 Total/NA 5
LTotal Dissolved Solids 840 10 mg/L 1 SM 2540C Total/NA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 5 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)

Client Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Date Collected: 06/20/19 08:55 Matrix: Water
3
Date Received: 06/20/19 12:50
4
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 5
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1 6
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
7
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
8
1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
9
Benzene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1 10
Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
Bromomethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1 11
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
Chlorobenzene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1 12
Dibromochloromethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
Chloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1 13
Chloroform ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
Chloromethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1 14
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
Bromodichloromethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
Ethylbenzene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
15
Methylene Chloride ND 2.0 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
Tetrachloroethene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
Toluene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 6.5 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
Vinyl chloride ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
Trichloroethene 57 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 22 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
Methyl tert-butyl ether ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 12:57 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac

4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 120 80 - 120 07/02/19 12:57 1
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 96 76 - 132 07/02/19 12:57 1
LToluene-d8 (Surr) 107 80 - 128 07/02/19 12:57 1
iGeneral Chemistry
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
LTotal Dissolved Solids 840 10 mg/L 06/24/19 09:00 1
Page 6 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)

Surrogate Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
3
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits) 4
BFB DBFM TOL
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) (76-132) (80-128) 5
720-93627-1 272NEC-EFT 120 96 107
LCS 440-555711/5 Lab Control Sample 116 91 105 6
MB 440-555711/4 Method Blank 120 91 110
Surrogate Legend 7
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 8
L TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 7 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-555711/4 Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA 4
Analysis Batch: 555711
MB MB 5
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1 6
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1
7
■9
8
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1 10
Benzene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1
Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1 11
Bromomethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1 12
Chlorobenzene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1
Dibromochloromethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1 13
Chloroethane ND 1.0 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1
Chloroform ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1 14
Chloromethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1
15
Toluene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1
Trichloroethene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/02/19 08:24 1
MB MB
LToluene-d8 (Surr) 110 80 - 128 07/02/19 08:24 1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-555711/5 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Spike LCS LCS %Rec.
Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 25.0 28.0 ug/L 112 70 - 130

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 25.0 22.0 ug/L 88 63 - 130
1,1-Dichloroethane 25.0 23.2 ug/L 93 64 - 130
1,1-Dichloroethene 25.0 26.1 ug/L 104 70 - 130
Page 8 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
3
Spike LCS LCS %Rec.
5
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 25.0 24.4 ug/L 98 70 - 130

6
1,2-Dichloropropane 25.0 22.7 ug/L 91 67 - 130
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 25.0 24.2 ug/L 97 70 - 130 7
Benzene
Bromoform
Bromomethane
25.0
25.0
25.0
23.7
17.9
20.5
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
95
72
82
68 - 130
60 - 148
64 - 139
■9
8
Carbon tetrachloride 25.0 26.4 ug/L 106 60 - 150

Chlorobenzene 25.0 24.5 ug/L 98 70 - 130 10
Dibromochloromethane 25.0 22.9 ug/L 92 69 - 145
Chloroethane 25.0 21.6 ug/L 87 64 - 135 11
Chloroform 25.0 23.7 ug/L 95 70 - 130
Chloromethane 25.0 16.1 ug/L 65 47 - 140 12
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 26.2 ug/L 105 70 - 133
Bromodichloromethane 25.0 24.9 ug/L 100 70 - 132
Ethylbenzene 25.0 26.5 ug/L 106 70 - 130
13
Methylene Chloride 25.0 22.9 ug/L 92 52 - 130
Tetrachloroethene 25.0 22.3 ug/L 89 70 - 130
14
Toluene 25.0 25.3 ug/L 101 70 - 130
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 25.0 24.3 ug/L 97 70 - 130
15
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 26.4 ug/L 106 70 - 132
Trichlorofluoromethane 25.0 29.4 ug/L 118 60 - 150
Vinyl chloride 25.0 20.4 ug/L 82 59 - 133
Trichloroethene 25.0 23.3 ug/L 93 70 - 130
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 25.0 22.6 ug/L 90 70 - 133
Methyl tert-butyl ether 25.0 25.6 ug/L 102 63 - 131
LCS LCS
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 116 80 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 91 76 - 132
LToluene-d8 (Surr) 105 80 - 128
Method: SM 2540C - Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS)

MB MB
LTotal Dissolved Solids ND 10 mg/L 06/24/19 09:00 1
Spike LCS LCS %Rec.
L- - - - - - - - - - -
Analyte
Total Dissolved Solids
Added
1000
Result Qualifier
986
Unit
mg/L
D %Rec
99
Limits
90 - 110 --
Page 9 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)

QC Association Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
GC/MS VOA
,
Lab
_ Sample
_
720-93627-1
ID
MB 440-555711/4
_ Client
_ Sample
_
272NEC-EFT
ID _ _ _ Prep
Method Blank
_ Type_ _
Matrix _ _
Method _ _
Total/NA
Total/NA
Prep Batch
Water
Water
_
624
624
3
4
5
LLCS 440-555711/5 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 624
6
General Chemistry
Analysis Batch: 554202 7
1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Lab Sample ID
720-93627-1
Client Sample ID
272NEC-EFT
Prep Type
Total/NA
Matrix
Water
Method
SM 2540C
Prep Batch
8
■
MB 440-554202/1 Method Blank Total/NA Water SM 2540C
9
LLCS 440-554202/2 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water SM 2540C
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 10 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)

Lab Chronicle 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
iPrep Type
- - -
Batch
Type
-
Batch
Method
- - -
Run
-
Dilution
Factor
- -
Batch
-
Prepared
Number or Analyzed Analyst
- - -
Lab
-
5
Total/NA Analysis 624 1 555711 07/02/19 12:57 RM TAL IRV
LTotal/NA Analysis SM 2540C 1 554202 06/24/19 09:00 XL TAL IRV 6

Laboratory References: 7
TAL IRV = Eurofins TestAmerica, Irvine, 17461 Derian Ave, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92614-5817, TEL (949)261-1022
8
9
■
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 11 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)

Accreditation/Certification Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
All accreditations/certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all accreditations/certifications are applicable to this report. 3
Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date 4
California State Program 9 2496 01-31-20
■56
USDA Federal P330-17-00380 12-11-20
Laboratory: Eurofins TestAmerica, Irvine

All accreditations/certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all accreditations/certifications are applicable to this report.

Alaska State Program 10 CA01531 06-30-20
Arizona State Program 9 AZ0671 10-14-19 8
California LA Cty Sanitation Districts 9 10256 06-30-20
California State Program 9 CA ELAP 2706 06-30-19 * 9
Guam State Program 9 Cert. No. 19-005R 01-23-20
Hawaii State Program 9 N/A 01-29-20 10
Kansas NELAP 7 E-10420 07-31-19 *
■
Nevada State Program 9 CA015312019-5 07-31-19 *
New Mexico State Program 6 N/A 01-29-20
11
Oregon NELAP 10 4028 01-29-20
US Fish & Wildlife Federal 058448 07-31-19 *
12
USDA Federal P330-18-00214 07-09-21
Washington State Program 10 C900 09-03-19
13
14
15
* Accreditation/Certification renewal pending - accreditation/certification considered valid.
Page 12 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)

Method Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
Method Method Description Protocol Laboratory
624 Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) 40CFR136A TAL IRV
SM 2540C Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS) SM TAL IRV
4
Protocol References:
5
40CFR136A = "Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal Industrial Wastewater", 40CFR, Part 136, Appendix A, October 26, 1984 and
subsequent revisions. 6
SM = "Standard Methods For The Examination Of Water And Wastewater"
7
Laboratory References:
TAL IRV = Eurofins TestAmerica, Irvine, 17461 Derian Ave, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92614-5817, TEL (949)261-1022 8
9
10
11
■
12
13
14
15
Page 13 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)

Sample Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received Asset ID
720-93627-1 272NEC-EFT Water 06/20/19 08:55 06/20/19 12:50
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
■
13
14
15
Page 14 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)

SERIAL NO.
it.oc us CHAIN-OF-C
I USTODY RECO RD
TECHNOLOGIES I
::p::- Jq01f'<frO
(See Reverls!!for Instructions)
1513'
/1/Ec SAMPLERS / t ehry Cas ~ .:,;,; SAMPLE CONTAINER
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
.
'1_
irocJ ·z- 9 'l-;;)~" /
~ 7lt1- ,,, :I,
7 lf'>RINTI
(SIGN) DESCRIPTION CODES
0-ml VOA Vial
l~ AMPLE DESCRIPTION CODES
~round Water
B. Surface Water ' 6 Waste
F. Oil
m
TAT CODES
tandard
~ Glass Llte,;z. :,c> E Brass Tube C. Leachate _ Blank/Spike 't-{.' 4sHour
RECORDER (SI Plasllc '500-ml H'\/F Other D. Rinseate . Other _ __ 3. 24 Hour
D. Plastic Liter E. Soil/Sediment 4. Other
<>
°ll 8
~ NUMBEROF
CONTAINERS
.,.,, ~:x- LABORATORY USE ONLY
ANALYTICAL LAB --re-1'-f Affl~,-,~ E

~ ~
~
AND
PRESERVATION
~
0
u 01
:g !
.,, j~l---------------~----i
~~
p fl
LAB PROJECT NO.
!,
~
~ f--~~~--1
:8
.!!, :,:oo~
-
E""
C'
".; .
~
-~ l
"C
~ 0 ... il i :i ea:
.§i=-g ~
0 ~l---====---.-------,-;:;-;~;:;;-~7
.,
".
:, Zn· SAMPLE
I I I I I ~ ~ ~
:I:
AVERAGE 8 ll li .." .t::
-a; ASSIGNED
I C'
::; ::;
., <
g CONDITION
pHl i ~ ~
a: C. NOTES BOTTLE
~
E o UPON
NO. I DATE I TIME I SAMPLE ID T~~p I nt~cm I c\1l z NUMBERS
RECEIPT
1 1£ ~o79l~S-5 I::2.. 7.2. #JEc.-~ F7 k'l-lA+ I I3. I I lXI><
2 16-.iot<fl '?-!?s- 1 K 1,,,_ V\. Cl/t i/ I I I I ~ I lX
3
4
5
6
7
8
Page 15 of 18
9
10
11
12
lllll/11111/llllllll111~111
720-93627 Chain of Custody
13
14 I
15
16
NOTES/ MISCELLANEOUS Field/ Container Temp. jR~shed By: (Signature)
('//_..,_ _ a eceived By: (Signature)
• '{;l,.,..,; ... cl
Date
4/4~.h
Time
I/.!2-: ,
0,)c, ature)
~ ~ !.~J
/ Dafo • Time
Reli uished By: (Signature) Received By: (Signature)

rohdr"' Lc5l5'-c:>
v Date Time
Container Sealed with Custody Seal: Yes 0 No O
Method of Shipment I Description of Other Chains-of-Custody Dispatched By: (Signature) Date Time Received for lab By: (Signature) Date Time
.1)/'y/' ~ b-'.20/ l/
Send Lab Results to (Name): ,If/a J'I.-C '-/ Sea-J"lr--e Lefevre- // (Check Office Below) Verbals Requested: Yes O No 0
7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)
(
0 MOUNTAIN VIEW• 299 FAIRCHILD DRIVE• MTN VIEW, CA 94043 • TEL (650) 960-1640 • FAX (650) 960-0739
□ WALNUT CREEK• 1701 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD• WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 • TEL (925) 906-8100 • FAX (925) 906-8101
0 SACRAMENTO• 1100 MELODY LANE• ROSEVILLE, CA 95678 • TEL (916) 677-1751 • FAX (916) 677-1760
□ OTHER _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ TEL _ _ _ _ FAX _ _ _ __
REV.6/02
WHITE: L.aboratO!)' Copy YELLOW: Project Copy PINK: Database Copy
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
:!
1,
~:: eurofins Ii
1220 Quarry Lane
Chain of Custody Record 111111111111111111111111111 Environment Testrn ; j !
Pleasanton. CA 94566 TestAm en ca : I
Sampler· Lab PM Carner Tracktng No(s)· COC No:
Client Information (Sub Contract Lab) Smith, Micah 720-42587.1
Ghent Contact Phone. E-Mail. State of Dngm Page·
Shipping/Receiving micah.smllh@testamericarnc com Callfornra Page 1 of 1 '
Company: Accred•tatrons Required (See note) Job#·
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc 720-93627-1
Address Due D•te Requested : Preservation Codes:
17461 Derian Ave, Suite 100, 7/2/2019 Analysis Requested
A- HCL M- Hexane
City TAT Requested (days):
Irvine
,,
',, ' it:~ ;' '
6-NaOH
C - Zn Acetate
N-None
O- AsNa02
State, Zip: D - N1tnc Acid P- Na204S
l
'' !
CA, 9261 4-5817 E- NaHS04 O-Na2S03
' F- MeOH R-Na2520 3
PO #
Phone
949-261-1022(Tel) 949-260-3297(Fax)
-~ G-Amchlor
H - Ascom,c Acid
S-H2S04 i
Email: WO #. ig i
1
I~ Ic e
T • TSP Dodecahydrate
U - Acetone
! J • DI Water V- MCAA
Proiect Name ProJect # 'I . :I!
uj J'· K -EDTA
L -EDA
W-pH4-5
Z • other (specify)
NEC
Site
72014506
SSOW#·
u
~
I'·,g,: Ot~er·
J,
.;
·'·'ti
:').°
. . . . II
,--.
+
Sample Matrix '0
Type
" ~
1i
u, ::)
i,
·z
Samele Identification • Client ID (Lab ID) Samele Date
Sample
Time
(C=comp,
G=arabl
0-WHlt/ofi,
BT•TIMu., A-Air) ' .~ ~I
i..i
:,.;;,
.j'
Soeclal Instructions/Note:
I
Page 16 of 18
•\,··;\\ :~:~\I;°• ,\ .,~i:. ,.•:. ,·

·:·::::::::,....,::,:.,. >:><.: :1•;.,~ -~ (.::-. X '
,I •,~' ',,❖ ::,:' }',, ;,.,·,:,,1: 1' ,;, ,)~ : ',' ," ' ·.-:'':. ,,•',,\\,:, ~\,1 11 , ,I
1'{, ::•: ~ , :', 11\', ,,
' , ,,',,, •\
', ·,·1: :·.
08:55
272NEC-EFT (720-93627-1) 6/20/19
Pac1f1c
Water X X :f
' \ ~ '
,.,,,,,'I•
l
,1',
.,
l
I
•,•
I
•:\,' I
,' '\:
i
I
'•1' I
·'
·:11 J
:,•,,' !
,' •",
Nate· Since laboratory acered1tat1ons are subJect to change, TestAmenca Laboratones, Inc places the ownershtp of method, analyte & accreditation compliance upon out subcontract laboratortes This sample shipment is forwarded under cha1n--of-custody. If the laboratory does not
currently maintain aecreditat1on 1n the State of Ong1n listed above for analysls/tests/matnx being analyZeO. the samples must be shipped back to the TestAmenca laboratory or other Instructions w1U be provided Any changes to accreditation status should be bto vght to TestAmenca
Lat>oratones, Inc attention 1mmed1ately. If all requested accred1tabons are current to date, return the signed Chain of Custody attesting to said comphcance to TestAmenca Laboratones. Inc.
Possible Hazard Identification Sample Disposal ( A fee may be assessed if samples are retained longer than 1 month)
Unconfirmed D Return To Client CJ Disposal By Lab CJ Archive For Months
Deliverable Requested: I, II, Ill, IV, Other (specify) Primary Deliverable Rank: 2 Special lnstructrons/QC Requirements: II
Method of Shipment
~•Yn '"'°"l.qu,shed bL Dale: Time. I/ ,,
'II a1
7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)
Reh"')"1Shedr
'\..../ ~ X D(.';,'7?11 IC/ I 60I /7tPL6 c
Received by:
/?fr''' Datemm..-_
C/41..2 //0 0 Cor'}f-?~y
i
i
Rel!1~u,s,by u Dale!Tt/"e I Company Received by
-;. Oafl'/1,me , Company ''
Relmqu,shed by. Daterr1me: Company Received by Date/Time: Company II
Cooler Temperature(s) •c and Other Remart<s·

C u s ~ l s Intact: icustody Seal No.:
49cJ0 f~9 G"87C/ :Jf /3·8 /Pdo/ 11
-
Yes I!. No
<...:.._./ Ver 01116/2019
,-----, ,---
,--- J
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
Login Sample Receipt Checklist
2
Client: Locus Technologies Job Number: 720-93627-1 3
Login Number: 93627 List Source: Eurofins TestAmerica, Pleasanton

4
List Number: 1
Creator: Arauz, Dennis
5
Question Answer Comment 6
Radioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey N/A
meter. 7
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. N/A
Sample custody seals, if present, are intact. N/A 8
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True
tampered with. 9
Samples were received on ice. True
Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True 10
Cooler Temperature is recorded. True
COC is present. True 11
COC is filled out in ink and legible. True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True 12
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? True
There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. True
13
Samples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate True 14
HTs)
■
Sample containers have legible labels. True
Containers are not broken or leaking. True
15
Sample collection date/times are provided. True
Appropriate sample containers are used. True
Sample bottles are completely filled. True
Sample Preservation Verified. N/A
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested True
MS/MSDs
Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is True
<6mm (1/4").
Multiphasic samples are not present. True
Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True
Residual Chlorine Checked. N/A

Page 17 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)
1
2
Login Number: 93627 List Source: Eurofins TestAmerica, Irvine

4
List Number: 2 List Creation: 06/22/19 02:14 PM
Creator: Ornelas, Olga
5
Radioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey True
meter. 7
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. True
Sample custody seals, if present, are intact. N/A Not Present 8
tampered with. 9
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? N/A Received project as a subcontract.
13
HTs)
■
15
MS/MSDs
<6mm (1/4").

Page 18 of 18 7/18/2019 (Rev. 1)
.;; eurofins ■12
Environment Testing
3
TestAmerica
4
5
ANALYTICAL REPORT
6
1220 Quarry Lane 7
Tel: (925)484-1919 8
For:
10
Locus Technologies 11
299 Fairchild Drive
Mountain View, California 94043 12
Attn: Nancy-Jeanne LeFevre 13
14
15
7/5/2019 3:21:43 PM
Nathaniel Horner, Project Management Assistant I
nathaniel.horner@testamericainc.com
Designee for
(925)484-1919
·· ·· ·········· LINKS ........... .
Review your project

results through
TotalAccess
Have a Question.
. ,
The
Visit us at:
Project/Site: NEC
2
Table of Contents 3
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
5
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8
8
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
10
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 11
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 12
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
17
13
14
15

Page 2 of 17 7/5/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
Glossary
3
%R Percent Recovery
4
NC Not Calculated
11
12
QC Quality Control
Page 3 of 17 7/5/2019
Case Narrative 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Job ID: 720-93628-1 3
4
Narrative
Job Narrative 5
720-93628-1
6
Comments
Receipt
The sample was received on 6/20/2019 12:50 PM; the sample arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice. 8
The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 4.3º C.
9
GC/MS VOA
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. 10
11
12
13
14
15

Page 4 of 17 7/5/2019
Detection Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Client Sample ID: 272NEC-01AE Lab Sample ID: 720-93628-1
3
- - -
- - -
2.4
- - - -
0.50
- - -
ug/L
- -
1
- -
8260B
- - -
Total/NA 4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 26 0.50 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA
Trichloroethene 20 0.50 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA 5
L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.54 0.50 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 5 of 17 7/5/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1 6
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1
7
8
9
1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1 12
Dichlorobromomethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1 13
Chlorodibromomethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1
15
Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.54 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1
Ethylene Dibromide ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1
Benzene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1
Toluene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1
m-Xylene & p-Xylene ND 1.0 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1
o-Xylene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1
Xylenes, Total ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 12:31 1

Toluene-d8 (Surr) 92 70 - 130 07/03/19 12:31 1
L1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 95 72 - 130 07/03/19 12:31 1
Page 6 of 17 7/5/2019
Surrogate Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
TOL DCA
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (70-130) (72-130) 5
720-93628-1 272NEC-01AE 92 95
LCS 720-268680/6 Lab Control Sample 92 96 6
LCSD 720-268680/7 Lab Control Sample Dup 92 95
MB 720-268680/5 Method Blank 90 99
7
Surrogate Legend
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr) 8
L DCA = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 7 of 17 7/5/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
MB MB 5
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 09:39 1 6
7
■9
8
Trichloroethene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 09:39 1 12
Dichlorobromomethane ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 09:39 1 13
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 09:39 1 14
15
Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 07/03/19 09:39 1
Benzene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 09:39 1
Toluene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 09:39 1
o-Xylene ND 0.50 ug/L 07/03/19 09:39 1
MB MB
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 90 70 - 130 07/03/19 09:39 1
Page 8 of 17 7/5/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
3
Spike LCS LCS %Rec. 5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1,1-Dichloroethene 25.0 21.5 ug/L 86 69 - 119 6

Dichlorodifluoromethane 25.0 20.9 ug/L 84 21 - 150
7
■9
Chloroethane 25.0 24.2 ug/L 97 70 - 131
8
Chloroform 25.0 24.1 ug/L 96 82 - 119 10
Carbon tetrachloride 25.0 24.0 ug/L 96 72 - 142 11
Trichloroethene 25.0 23.2 ug/L 93 80 - 123 12
Dichlorobromomethane 25.0 25.3 ug/L 101 81 - 130 13
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 24.4 ug/L 98 82 - 119 14
Chlorodibromomethane 25.0 24.6 ug/L 99 77 - 133
15
Chlorobenzene 25.0 24.1 ug/L 96 76 - 116
Bromoform 25.0 23.2 ug/L 93 75 - 127
Chloromethane 25.0 27.0 ug/L 108 49 - 134
Bromomethane 25.0 22.9 ug/L 92 70 - 132
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroetha 25.0 20.5 ug/L 82 70 - 133
ne
Ethylene Dibromide 25.0 23.5 ug/L 94 80 - 121
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 25.0 23.2 ug/L 93 78 - 120
Benzene 25.0 23.3 ug/L 93 79 - 119
Toluene 25.0 23.6 ug/L 95 75 - 120
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 25.0 24.0 ug/L 96 74 - 119
o-Xylene 25.0 24.5 ug/L 98 77 - 118
LCS LCS
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 92 70 - 130
L1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 96 72 - 130
Page 9 of 17 7/5/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
Lab Sample ID: LCSD 720-268680/7 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup
Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD 5
Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1,1-Dichloroethene 25.0 21.3 ug/L 85 69 - 119 1 20 6

1,1-Dichloroethane 25.0 23.7 ug/L 95 77 - 119 1 20
Dichlorodifluoromethane 25.0 20.4 ug/L 81 21 - 150 2 20
Vinyl chloride 25.0 24.8 ug/L 99 58 - 138 0 20
7
■9
Chloroethane 25.0 23.9 ug/L 96 70 - 131 1 20
Trichlorofluoromethane 25.0 23.7 ug/L 95 75 - 141 1 20
8
Methylene Chloride 25.0 22.0 ug/L 88 75 - 117 1 20
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 25.0 22.2 ug/L 89 79 - 117 2 20
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 25.0 25.0 ug/L 100 77 - 117 2 20
Chloroform 25.0 23.7 ug/L 95 82 - 119 1 20 10
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 25.0 23.8 ug/L 95 74 - 130 1 20
Carbon tetrachloride 25.0 23.9 ug/L 95 72 - 142 1 20 11
Trichloroethene 25.0 23.1 ug/L 92 80 - 123 1 20 12
1,2-Dichloropropane 25.0 25.0 ug/L 100 79 - 119 1 20
Dichlorobromomethane 25.0 24.9 ug/L 100 81 - 130 1 20 13
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 22.5 ug/L 90 76 - 122 3 20
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 23.9 ug/L 96 82 - 119 2 20 14
Tetrachloroethene 25.0 23.1 ug/L 92 81 - 130 1 20
Chlorodibromomethane 25.0 23.8 ug/L 95 77 - 133 4 20
15
Chlorobenzene 25.0 23.1 ug/L 92 76 - 116 4 20
Bromoform 25.0 21.9 ug/L 88 75 - 127 6 20
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 25.0 22.9 ug/L 91 70 - 115 3 20
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 25.0 23.8 ug/L 95 76 - 116 1 20
Chloromethane 25.0 26.8 ug/L 107 49 - 134 1 20
Bromomethane 25.0 22.7 ug/L 91 70 - 132 1 20
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroetha 25.0 20.6 ug/L 82 70 - 133 0 20
ne
Ethylene Dibromide 25.0 22.3 ug/L 89 80 - 121 5 20
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 25.0 23.4 ug/L 94 78 - 120 1 20
Benzene 25.0 23.1 ug/L 92 79 - 119 1 20
Toluene 25.0 22.9 ug/L 91 75 - 120 3 20
Ethylbenzene 25.0 24.0 ug/L 96 77 - 117 3 20
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 25.0 23.2 ug/L 93 74 - 119 3 20
o-Xylene 25.0 23.5 ug/L 94 77 - 118 4 20
LCSD LCSD
Page 10 of 17 7/5/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
GC/MS VOA
3
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 4
720-93628-1 272NEC-01AE Total/NA Water 8260B
MB 720-268680/5 Method Blank Total/NA Water 8260B 5
LCS 720-268680/6 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 8260B
LLCSD 720-268680/7 Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Water 8260B 6

7
8
■9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 11 of 17 7/5/2019
Lab Chronicle 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
i Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared
5
L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Prep Type
Total/NA
Type
Analysis
Method
8260B
Run Factor
1
Number or Analyzed Analyst
268680 07/03/19 12:31 AJS
Lab
TAL PLS
6
TAL PLS = Eurofins TestAmerica, Pleasanton, 1220 Quarry Lane, Pleasanton, CA 94566, TEL (925)484-1919
7
8
9
■
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 12 of 17 7/5/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
California State Program 9 2496 01-31-20
■56
USDA Federal P330-17-00380 12-11-20
7
8
9
10
■
11
12
13
14
15
Page 13 of 17 7/5/2019
Method Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) SW846 TAL PLS
5030B Purge and Trap SW846 TAL PLS
4
5
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
6
TAL PLS = Eurofins TestAmerica, Pleasanton, 1220 Quarry Lane, Pleasanton, CA 94566, TEL (925)484-1919 7
8
9
10
11
■
12
13
14
15
Page 14 of 17 7/5/2019
Sample Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
720-93628-1 272NEC-01AE Water 06/20/19 10:00 06/20/19 12:50
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
■
13
14
15
Page 15 of 17 7/5/2019
~OCUS CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD (Se~everse tor'in"strbctions)
.Al/(/() 77,<;f I SERIAL NO.
TECHNOLOGIES 15 137
PROJECT NAME #G C SAMPLERS J/-enry, C ._3·-/1,, :, J r~
(PRIND
SAMPLE CONTAINER SAMPLE DESCRIPTION CODES TAT CODES
PROJECT NUMBER 9 :t,-v O 7 - 'f Cj ~ .?--r) D DESCRIPTION CODES
K'>.o-ml VOA Vial
~ round Water
urface Water
F.
G.
Oil
Waste & standard
~ ~ ~~ Glass Liter
(SIGN) C. Leachate H. Blank/Spike 2. 48 Hour
E. Brass Tube
RECORDER
GN) 7JD- 11&zv C. Plastic 500-ml
D. Plastic Liter
F. Other--~ D. Rinseate
E. Soil/Sediment
I. Other _ _ _ 3. 24 Hour
4. Other _ _ _
" {l NUMBER OF ANALYSIS REQUESTED - ~::i" LABORATORY USE ONLY

-g 8 CONTAINERS {l
ANALYTICAL LAB ·TeJf A~ rte?.. ~
! ~
ti AND ':... 8 g, :e 11 ~- --------- ------ ---i
~~
PRESERVATION ,> £ LAB PROJECT NO.
i ~ !:
ii
. .
:§
IH
.!. -;; 1--.---~ - ~-1 L- (J "
~.e g- "'- .,a.
~
0 "
ea:
I
E
E ~~-- - -- ---,---- -- -, --;::--:~;::---;:-7
L i"CA, !5- ~i='8
pHH ~ i~ ~
COOJO...J G> 0 "
~ SAMPLE
~
;;;
AVERAGE 8 gi f i "ij
::; ::;
~
:I:
~
ASSIGNED
.!!
NOTES BOTTLE CONDITION
1 II II I TEMP E~
NO. I DATE TIME SAMPLE ID •c I COND I
miciomhoslcm IJ) Jl u: Lll
Jl z NUMBERS
UPON
RECEIPT
1
2
lt :JOi'il/ ooo ~ Al'£C - oJA-5 IA- ILl •
,,., I)<'.
3
4
5
6
7
8
Page 16 of 17
9
10
11
12
11111 H lll ll lWI
13
14
15
16 1
Ji m
I I
I I
J_J
-"-1--1--- t--t--t--t--tt--t-------+--t- t--- - -- -+- -- -+-- -- ---l
--·· - . -
NOTES/ MISCELLANEOUS Field/ Container Temp. Date Time
1Relinquished By: ~
y,_) 2-
- . y: ( S i g ~ .;;
~-<= _· --r .·-nu,10~11 d1Lc 10:;{i,
I Re,~nqui5l1ed By/fSJ,9.ignnaa,O,e) I Rec;;~d By: (Signa.tu~- - / - __ Time
J:=--- /"7?itnt{) U-1~ ~ - 7---- J <7-yi

Relih{!Oished By: (S~a\ure) l~eceivedBy: (Signature) Time
Container Sealed with Custody Seal: Yes 0 NoO
Method of Shipment I Description of Other Chains-of-Custody Dispatched By: (Signature) Date Time Received for lab By: (Signature) Date ~
~ o/ 6 ~>t>f'1_
Send Lab Results to (Name): Al'a l'L '-. Iy JeA".,1 ;,.,e le.- ~ v re.,__ (Check Office Below) Verbals Requested: Yes D No 0
0 MOUNTAIN VIEW• 299 FAIRCHILD DRIVE • MTN VIEW, CA 94043 • TEL (650) 960-1640 • FAX (650) 960-0739
0 WALNUT CREEK• 1701 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD• WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 • TEL (925) 906-8100 • FAX (925) 906-8101
0
7/5/2019
0 OTHER _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ TEL _ _ _ _ FAX _ _ _ __
REV.6/02
WHITE: Laboratcxy Copy YELLOW: Project Copy PINK: DatabaseCopy
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
2

4
List Number: 1
5
meter. 7
tampered with. 9
13
HTs)
■
15
MS/MSDs
<6mm (1/4").

Page 17 of 17 7/5/2019
.;; eurofins ■12
Environment Testing
3
TestAmerica
4
5
ANALYTICAL REPORT
6
1220 Quarry Lane 7
Tel: (925)484-1919 8
For:
10
299 Fairchild Drive
14
15
9/25/2019 2:12:46 PM
(925)484-1919
·· ·· ·········· LINKS ........... .
Review your project

results through
TotalAccess
Have a Question.
. ,
The
Visit us at:
Project/Site: NEC
2
Table of Contents 3
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
5
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8
8
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
10
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 11
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 12
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
17
13
14
15

Page 2 of 18 9/25/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
Glossary
3
%R Percent Recovery
4
CNF Contains No Free Liquid
5
MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
10
NC Not Calculated
11
12
QC Quality Control
RER Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
13
Page 3 of 18 9/25/2019
Case Narrative 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Job ID: 720-95003-1 3
4
Narrative
Job Narrative 5
720-95003-1
6
Comments
Receipt
9
GC/MS VOA
General Chemistry
11
12
13
14
15

Page 4 of 18 9/25/2019
Detection Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
- -
- - - -
6.9
- - - -
0.50
- - -
ug/L
- -
1
- -
624
- - -
Total/NA 4
Trichloroethene 62 0.50 ug/L 1 624 Total/NA
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 22 0.50 ug/L 1 624 Total/NA 5
LTotal Dissolved Solids 800 10 mg/L 1 SM 2540C Total/NA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 5 of 18 9/25/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
7
8
9
Benzene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/20/19 15:17 1 10
Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 09/20/19 15:17 1
15
Toluene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/20/19 15:17 1

L Toluene-d8 (Surr) 103 80 - 128 09/20/19 15:17 1
i General Chemistry
L Total Dissolved Solids 800 10 mg/L 09/18/19 09:36 1
Page 6 of 18 9/25/2019
Surrogate Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
BFB DBFM TOL
720-95003-1 273NEC-EFT 99 99 103
MB 440-569819/7 Method Blank 97 98 100
Surrogate Legend 7
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 8
L TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 7 of 18 9/25/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
MB MB 5
7
■9
8
Benzene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/20/19 10:17 1
Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 09/20/19 10:17 1 11
15
Toluene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/20/19 10:17 1
MB MB
LToluene-d8 (Surr) 100 80 - 128 09/20/19 10:17 1
Spike LCS LCS %Rec.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Page 8 of 18 9/25/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
3
Spike LCS LCS %Rec.
5
- - - - - - - - - - - - -

6
7
■9
Benzene 10.0 10.2 ug/L 102 68 - 130 8
Bromoform 10.0 9.13 ug/L 91 60 - 148
Chloroform 10.0 10.3 ug/L 103 70 - 130
13
14
Toluene 10.0 10.2 ug/L 102 70 - 130
15
LCS LCS

MB MB
Spike LCS LCS %Rec.
L- - - - - - - - - - -
Analyte
Added
1000
Result Qualifier
976
Unit
mg/L
D %Rec
98
Limits
90 - 110 --
Page 9 of 18 9/25/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
GC/MS VOA
,
Lab
_ Sample_
720-95003-1
ID
MB 440-569819/7
_ Client
_ Sample
273NEC-EFT
_ ID _ _ _ Prep
Method Blank
_ Type _ _
Total/NA
Matrix
Water
Method _ _
_ _
624
Total/NA
Prep Batch
_
Water 624
3
4
5
LLCS 440-569819/5 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 624
6
General Chemistry
Analysis Batch: 569350 7
1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Lab Sample ID
720-95003-1
Client Sample ID
273NEC-EFT
Prep Type
Total/NA
Matrix
Water
Method
SM 2540C
Prep Batch
8
■
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 10 of 18 9/25/2019
Lab Chronicle 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
iPrep Type
- - -
Batch
Type
-
Batch
Method
- -
Run
-
Dil
Factor
-
Initial
Amount
-
Final
Amount
-
Batch
Number
- -
Prepared
or Analyzed
-
Analyst
-
Lab
-
5
Total/NA Analysis 624 1 10 mL 10 mL 569819 09/20/19 15:17 DCI TAL IRV
LTotal/NA Analysis SM 2540C 1 100 mL 100 mL 569350 09/18/19 09:36 XL TAL IRV 6
Laboratory References: 7
8
9
■
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 11 of 18 9/25/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
Authority Program Identification Number Expiration Date 4
California State 2496 01-31-20
■56
California State Program 2496 01-31-20
USDA Federal P330-17-00380 12-11-20
USDA US Federal Programs P330-18-00328 11-06-21

7
Alaska State CA01531 06-30-20
Alaska State Program CA01531 06-30-20 9
Arizona State Program AZ0671 10-14-19 *
California LA Cty Sanitation Districts 10256 06-30-20 10
■
California State Program CA ELAP 2706 06-30-20
Guam State 19-005R 01-23-20
11
Guam State Program Cert. No. 19-005R 01-23-20
Hawaii State Program N/A 01-29-20
12
Kansas NELAP E-10420 07-31-20
13
Nevada State Program CA015312019-5 07-31-20
New Mexico State Program N/A 01-29-20 14
Oregon NELAP 4028 01-29-20
Oregon NELAP 4028 - 006 01-29-20 15
US Fish & Wildlife Federal 058448 07-31-20
US Fish & Wildlife US Federal Programs 058448 07-31-20
USDA Federal P330-18-00214 07-09-21
Washington State Program C900 09-03-19 *
* Accreditation/Certification renewal pending - accreditation/certification considered valid.
Page 12 of 18 9/25/2019
Method Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
624 Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) 40CFR136A TAL IRV
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
■
12
13
14
15
Page 13 of 18 9/25/2019
Sample Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
720-95003-1 273NEC-EFT Water 09/11/19 08:30 09/11/19 14:45
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
■
13
14
15
Page 14 of 18 9/25/2019
SERIAL NO.
it,.ocus CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD 151'-l~
/V/;::. k: .
PROJECT NAME
z SAMPLERS-- - - - ~ ~ - - - - - SAMPLE CONTAINER ctf~P~E;ESCRl~TiSNCODES TAT CODES
PROJECT NUMBER
Q ~ A ")
~ ,:) Cl'«:, -
~r~--oo
~ - - ? "7
£)
~
•
RECORDER - ----'--1~1=-"""~C"e:.~-"'-.rc--------~~
(SIG
--------------
, .,.,,,
I<,
(PRINl)
~SIGN
r7
'I
~0-ml VOA Vial
DESCRIPTION CODES
B. Glass Liter;::t.5"OE. Brass Tube
/O)Plastic-,...IF. Other _ _ _
'If" Plastic Liter ____
round Water
Surtace Water
C. Leachate
D. Rinseate
E. So11/Sed1ment
F. Oil
G. Waste
H. Blank/Spike
I. Other___
____
~
andard
B Hour
3. 24Hour
4. Other _ _
-.;- :N° NUMBER OF I ANALYSIS REQUESTED ., ~ ~ LABORATORY USE ONLY

°8 8 g g1-----------------1
f'e..r-./-- Al'neH ~
CONTAINERS
i~
:'.'"
~~
,,
ANALYTICAL LAB PREs~~A110N ~ .[ 1 e. e. LAB PROJECT NO.
1 f >----r--< i ~ i ~o~ ~ fJ
~ ..
i ~ ,, ~ l~ - V
~ fj'- ~I~
i ~-;; Z" m g.
' - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - , S .g-
M ~ ~ d
"j
'M r( .+=1.~
in
~ ,. _g !f -g~ 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -SAMPLE
-:,~._§~ ---1
AVERAGE o ~ !! :,:: :,:: .! La . \ - g- ca -;; .!! < ASSIGNED CONDITION
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - < .~ .!! g- ii: r""' \Jl l :: :! :! g- §? NOTES BOTTLE
TEMP COND pH ~ g- ::i ~ ~ '.J 1! ,jj ~ NUMBERS UPON
NO. DATE TIME SAMPLE ID •c micromhos/cm u, ~ ir: ~0 RECEIPT
1 Ci-/J-(9 ~1"" ?.. 7 ·~ A/r-.J - c FT A IA 3 )( X
2 'i-ll -1~ ~~o "- . ,._ - C IA l I")<'.'
3
4
5
6
7
Page 15 of 18
f:
12
1n1 IU11111\lll l
13
14 , , 1 II I I
15 ---.----+-+
11-+--+1-+--+1-tt---i11--+---+--t--1f--t---+--+-tt--+--+-+-+-------+,7-- ,--/,.""'J_al'--t-------l
16 I I I I II 4 ' v- L- _
NOTES/ MISCELLANEOUS Field/ Container Temp. R:!n~uishedJJ (?ignature) I✓ : eceive~ign~ture) Date Time_...
1---?LL- ~..,.., -,. ? - ,,~ ~-1/-IJ I y:J y,
Relinquished !:V"(Signature) ~ d l h - : (Signatur - Date ' Time
__, ~ ~ I:::?'" ~~
1
0,
,-/./.Pp - ~ · ,-,:;,., rll-/1 JLj,'t,,,:r
Relinquishecl By: (Signature) Received By: (Signature) Date Time
Container Sealed with Custody Seal: Yes O
No 0
Method of Shipment Description of Other Chains-of-Custody Dispatched By: (Signature) Date Time Received for lab By: (Signature) Date Time --
Chain (by Serial No.) .4] / ,,,c:;::> ./ , } J _} _
7 , " ~ ~ ~ '1-1&~9 >
/1/'011-cv 'J"'elf"/fn-e. Le. ~"rP
0 MOUNTAIN VIEW• 299 FAIRCHILD DRIVE • MTN VIEW, CA 94043 • TEL (650) 960-1640 • FAX (650) 960-0739
0 WALNUT CREEK• 1701 N . CALIFORNIA BLVD• WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 • TEL (925) 906-8100 • FAX (925) 906-8101
9/25/2019
0 OTHER _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ TEL _ _ _ _ _ FAX _ _ _ __
REV.6/02
WHITE: L.aboratcxyCopy YELLOW: Project Copy PINK: Database Copy
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Eurofins TestAmerica, Pfeasanton
1220 Quarry Lane
Chain of Custody Record I1111m1n1111~1 -;~ eurofins Env1ronmen1 Testing
Test/lmenca
Phone· 925-484-1919 Fax: 925-600-3002

Sampler- Lab PM Came, Tracking No(s). COCNo·
Client Information @ub Contract LabJ Smrth. Micah
1
720-43526. 1
Chant Contact· Phone· E-Mail· State of Ong,n: Page·
Shipping/Receiving micah.smith@testamenca1nc.com California Page 1 of 1
Company. Accredilatrons Required (See note) Job#
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc 720-95003-1
Address. Due Dal" Requested: Preservation Codes:
17461 Derian Ave, Suite 100, 9/23/2019 Analysis Requested A-HCL M•Hexane
' c~ .....r\ TATRaquested{days): . ,r': 8-NaOH N-None
Irvine i.J t ' ". ~~ C - Zn Acetate O·AsNa02
State Zip· j D • Nitric AC1d P-Na204S
CA. 92614-5817 ._ ,1: .. E • NaHS04 Q-Na2S03
Phone· PO#: Jf F -MeOH
G-Amchlor
R-Na2S203
S-H2S04
,949-261-1022(Tel} 949-260-3297(Fax) 1 -g ,~ H • Ascort)Ic Acid T • TSP Dodecahydrate
Email WO#, ~ \\! "~1 w ! - Ice u • Acetone
0 :e:I I!!'
I:
J-OIWater V-M(:AA
·• ·1112!,' ! K-EOTA W-pH4-5
Proiect Name· Pro)eCI #· - w L - EDA z - other (specify)
~
NEC 72014506
Site
1------------------+------,,----,----,.----t
,.,: ISSOW#: I
~
u
·
li
Other:
1:·t --------------1
+
Sample i ~ ·J
Sam_J)le Identification - Client ID (Lab ID}
Sample
Type
(C=comp,
..,
'-',
I :, '! Special Instructions/Note:

Page 16 of 18
Sam~
-·· :15'<,
08:30
273NEC-EFT (720-95003-1) 9/11/19 Water XIX ·4
Pacific
Note Since laboratory accreditallons are subiect to change, TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. places the O'M1ersh1p of method, analyte & accr&ditatmn campl1ance upon out subcontract laboratones. This sample shipment rs forwarded under cha1n-0f-custody If the taboralary does not
,currenUy maintain accred,tabon m the State of Ong,n listed above for ana1ys1s/lests1matrix being analyzed. the samples must be shipped back to the TestAmerica laboratory or other instructions will be provided Any changes to accreditabon status should be brought to TestAmenca
Laboratones. Inc attenbon ,mmedIately ~ al! requested accred1tabons are current to date, return the signed Chain of Custody attesbng to said compUcance to TestAmerica Labaratones, Inc
Possible Hazard Identification Sample Disposal ( A fee may be assessed If samples are retained longer than 1 month)
Unconnrmed □Return To Client □Disposal Br Lab □Archrve For _ _ _ _ Months
Deliverable Requested· I, II, Ill. IV. Other (specify) Primary Deliverable Rank: 2 Special Instructions/QC Requirements:
E~elinqu1shed by: Date: Time: Method of Shipment

_L J
Co~} ~
fe1inqu1she~~
9tr~//C, 13H& IReceivedby
/ _ / ) \II
:---_ 1Date/Tlme· Company
Rehnqu,sht bj \J Oate/1',me· I Company Received by:

I / /J /4/j IDatemme.
Company
9/25/2019
Rehnquishecfby Date/Time Company Rece,ved by:

~ Datel:'.t/ f3/ICL/Li£S[com~7Jt-///'v
Cooler Temperature(s) ~oi9'9"emarks:
Cus~~..aa.11...:s Intact: !Custody Seal No.:
~ \fl No 1/loZI 38L<-!'2.
l ./ ' Ver: 01/1612019
■
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
2

4
List Number: 1
5
meter. 7
tampered with. 9
COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True
12
13
HTs)
■
15
MS/MSDs
<6mm (1/4").

Page 17 of 18 9/25/2019
1
2

4
Creator: Dolidze, Lado
5
meter. 7
tampered with. 9
COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True
12
13
HTs)
■
15
MS/MSDs
<6mm (1/4").

Page 18 of 18 9/25/2019
.;; eurofins ■12
Environment Testing
3
TestAmerica
4
5
ANALYTICAL REPORT
6
1220 Quarry Lane 7
Tel: (925)484-1919 8
For:
10
299 Fairchild Drive
14
15
9/25/2019 2:08:09 PM
(925)484-1919
·· ·· ·········· LINKS ........... .
Review your project

results through
TotalAccess
Have a Question.
. ,
The
Visit us at:
Project/Site: NEC
2
Table of Contents 3
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
5
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8
8
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
10
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 11
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 12
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
17
13
14
15

Page 2 of 17 9/25/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
Glossary
3
%R Percent Recovery
4
NC Not Calculated
11
12
QC Quality Control
Page 3 of 17 9/25/2019
Case Narrative 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Job ID: 720-95002-1 3
4
Narrative
Job Narrative 5
720-95002-1
6
Comments
Receipt
9
Receipt Exceptions
One or more containers for the following sample(s) was received broken or leaking: 2 out of 3 containers received broken. Sample was 10
analyzed from the remaining vial.
GC/MS VOA
11
12
13
14
15

Page 4 of 17 9/25/2019
Detection Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
- - -
- - -
2.7
- - - -
0.50
- - -
ug/L
- -
1
- -
8260B
- - -
Total/NA 4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 29 0.50 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA
Trichloroethene 22 0.50 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA 5
L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.54 0.50 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 5 of 17 9/25/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
7
8
9
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/13/19 11:54 1 13
15
Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 09/13/19 11:54 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.54 0.50 ug/L 09/13/19 11:54 1
Benzene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/13/19 11:54 1
Toluene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/13/19 11:54 1
o-Xylene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/13/19 11:54 1

Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 70 - 130 09/13/19 11:54 1
Page 6 of 17 9/25/2019
Surrogate Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
TOL DCA
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (70-130) (72-130) 5
720-95002-1 273NEC-01AE 99 109
LCSD 720-272829/6 Lab Control Sample Dup 98 101
MB 720-272829/4 Method Blank 97 106
7
Surrogate Legend
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr) 8
L DCA = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 7 of 17 9/25/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
MB MB 5
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/13/19 10:53 1 6
7
■9
8
Trichloroethene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/13/19 10:53 1 12
Dichlorobromomethane ND 0.50 ug/L 09/13/19 10:53 1 13
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/13/19 10:53 1 14
15
Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 09/13/19 10:53 1
Benzene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/13/19 10:53 1
Toluene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/13/19 10:53 1
o-Xylene ND 0.50 ug/L 09/13/19 10:53 1
MB MB
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 97 70 - 130 09/13/19 10:53 1
Page 8 of 17 9/25/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
Spike LCS LCS %Rec. 5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7
■9
8
Chloroform 25.0 24.3 ug/L 97 82 - 119 10
Carbon tetrachloride 25.0 25.2 ug/L 101 72 - 142 11
Trichloroethene 25.0 24.3 ug/L 97 80 - 123 12
Dichlorobromomethane 25.0 25.1 ug/L 100 81 - 130 13
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 24.5 ug/L 98 82 - 119 14
15
Bromoform 25.0 26.4 ug/L 106 75 - 127
ne
Benzene 25.0 24.1 ug/L 96 79 - 119
Toluene 25.0 23.9 ug/L 96 75 - 120
o-Xylene 25.0 24.7 ug/L 99 77 - 118
LCS LCS
Page 9 of 17 9/25/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD 5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1,1-Dichloroethene 25.0 22.7 ug/L 91 69 - 119 2 20 6

7
■9
8
Chloroform 25.0 24.4 ug/L 98 82 - 119 0 20 10
Carbon tetrachloride 25.0 25.3 ug/L 101 72 - 142 0 20 11
Trichloroethene 25.0 24.2 ug/L 97 80 - 123 0 20 12
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 24.5 ug/L 98 82 - 119 0 20 14
15
Bromoform 25.0 26.1 ug/L 104 75 - 127 1 20
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 25.0 21.8 ug/L 87 70 - 115 1 20
Bromomethane 25.0 23.4 ug/L 93 70 - 132 1 20
ne
Benzene 25.0 24.0 ug/L 96 79 - 119 0 20
Toluene 25.0 23.8 ug/L 95 75 - 120 0 20
o-Xylene 25.0 24.6 ug/L 98 77 - 118 0 20
LCSD LCSD
Page 10 of 17 9/25/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
GC/MS VOA
3

7
8
■9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 11 of 17 9/25/2019
Lab Chronicle 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
i Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared
5
L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Prep Type
Total/NA
Type
Analysis
Method
8260B
Run Factor
1
Amount
10 mL
Amount
10 mL
Number
272829
or Analyzed Analyst
09/13/19 11:54 A1C
Lab
TAL PLS
6
7
8
9
■
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 12 of 17 9/25/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
■56
California State Program 2496 01-31-20
USDA Federal P330-17-00380 12-11-20
7
8
9
10
■
11
12
13
14
15
Page 13 of 17 9/25/2019
Method Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
■
12
13
14
15
Page 14 of 17 9/25/2019
Sample Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
720-95002-1 273NEC-01AE Water 09/11/19 09:30 09/11/19 14:45
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
■
13
14
15
Page 15 of 17 9/25/2019
SERIAL NO.
it,.acus
TECHNOLOGIES CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD (See Rove,~ fo, lostm,Uoo-!j,,o/ZZ fJ 151 '/f
NAME __
PROJECT -
---J-.''-£:---""'"'----------- SAMPLER S
(PRINT)
I SAMPLE CONTAINER I SAMPLE DESCRIPTION CODES TAT CODES
DESCRIPTION CODES
~ 0-ml VOA Vial
Ground Water F. Oil
PROJECTNUMBER_~-=-~:_:::::::.=:::~-C) (SIGN) . Surface Water G. Waste · 1. tandard
7Zo • -,
Glass Liter
C. Plastic 500-ml
E. Brass Tube
F. Other___
C. Leachate
D. Rinseate
H.
I.
Blank/Spike
Other _ __
_ _ _ _ _C'-~~~~~~~~lrJ_~D~.~P~l~as~ti~c~L~it~e r:__ __:-=-::,:-;=-=-=;-=~~1~E~.~S:o:il~/S:e~d~im:e~n~t--__::-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:~J~4~·~0~1h:•~r~=-=-=-=-=-J
48 Hour
3. 24 Hour
"°8 '8.8 NUMBER OF ANALYSIS REQUESTED - ::i"::i" LABORATORY USE ONLY

.-<= /_ A ,.
~ ~
CONTAINERS 11;.-~-~---~---~ -8
11l----- -- -- ------- ----.
ANALYTICAL LAB . f e..J r .Hnl -e-ry C-c,... AND 8
E ~ PRESERVATION a; :a ! ££"
01 "'
LAB PROJECT NO.
.!. -; f - - -- --l c ~a! .,- .,a. 0(.) U
-~lil
t
ifil E""
:, Ea:
., II)
.si=°8 tn-~ J:jl----- ---,-~---,--:::-:~~;:--.

I I I
!
I AVERAGE
! ~ ·t;
~ ~ f ~ ~
O ..J
!
-c
g- >< .J::
., '&i
:; :; " <(
ASSIGNED SAMPLE
CONDITION
~
~
~
a. NOTES BOTTLE
NO. I DATE I TIME I SAMPLE ID
TEMP
°C
I COND
mcromh06/cm
I pH li
1/1 c\1l
§
U: Ul
E o
ci1l z NUMBERS UPON
RECEIPT
1 'ff,Ji-!<tlCJZQ r:zJ3~c-e,1AEE.
- · . . - - .... - - - - -- - ----- IA-IA ~ I')(
2
3
4 --+-4- - - - - + - - -- --+--- - -----j

5
6
7
8
Page 16 of 17
9
10
11
12
\\l~\\\\1\1\\1\li l\l\i\l\\\\\\\\lil\\\
13
14
15
16
II
]
I I
I
I J
i' f)~
NOTES/ MISCELLANEOUS Field/ Container Temp. Date Time
Rel?;::.hed ~: ~ignature) l~~ure)
-7:L \ee£,,- '7-111'7 I f,f\:
l~(Si~ Date
~J/-1J. /'/,'fr
Time
Relinquished By: (Signature) - 1i:i'eceiv~ (Signature) Date Time

Container Sealed with Custody Seal: Yes DNo □
Method of Shipment I Description of Other Chains-of-Custody Dispatched By: (Signature) Date Time Received for lab By: (Signature) Date I T~
rl-tcL et:ci~11-1r JJ:'!5
Send Lab Results to (Name): Yane.v

(
-:fe.,-n~ L'e +evre.- (Check Office Below) Verbals Requested: Yes D No D
0 MOUNTAIN VIEW• 299 FAIRCHILD DRIVE• MTN VIEW, CA 94043 • TEL (650) 960-1640 • FAX (650) 960-0739
0 WALNUT CREEK• 1701 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD• WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 • TEL (925) 906-8100 • FAX (925) 906-8101
9/25/2019
0 OTHER _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ TEL _ _ _ _ _ FAX _ _ _ __
REV.6/02
WHITE: LaboratoryGopy YELLOW: Project Copy PINK: Database Copy
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
2

4
List Number: 1
5
meter. 7
tampered with. 9
13
HTs)
■
Containers are not broken or leaking. False Containers recd broken. Sufficient sample in
15
remaining containers for analysis.
MS/MSDs
<6mm (1/4").

Page 17 of 17 9/25/2019
.;; eurofins ■12
Environment Testing
3
TestAmerica
4
5
ANALYTICAL REPORT
6
1220 Quarry Lane 7
Tel: (925)484-1919 8
For:
10
299 Fairchild Drive
14
15
12/19/2019 5:52:21 PM
(925)484-1919
·· ·· ·········· LINKS ........... .
Review your project

results through
TotalAccess
Have a Question.
. ,
The
Visit us at:
Project/Site: NEC
2
Table of Contents 3
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
5
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
9
8
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
10
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 11
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 12
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
18
13
14
15

Page 2 of 20 12/19/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
Glossary
3
%R Percent Recovery
4
NC Not Calculated
11
12
QC Quality Control
Page 3 of 20 12/19/2019
Case Narrative 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Job ID: 720-96482-1 3
4
Narrative
Job Narrative 5
720-96482-1
6
Comments
Receipt
The samples were received on 12/10/2019 2:19 PM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on 8
ice. The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 1.6º C.
9
GC/MS VOA
General Chemistry
11
VOA Prep 12
13
14
15

Page 4 of 20 12/19/2019
Detection Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
- - -
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
- - -
25
- - - -
0.50
- - -
ug/L
- -
1
- -
624.1
- - -
Total/NA 4
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.5 0.50 ug/L 1 624.1 Total/NA
Trichloroethene 69 0.50 ug/L 1 624.1 Total/NA 5
L Total Dissolved Solids 780 10 mg/L 1 SM 2540C Total/NA
6
Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANK Lab Sample ID: 720-96482-2
[ No Detections. 7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 5 of 20 12/19/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
Method: 624.1 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
7
8
9
Benzene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/15/19 16:40 1 10
Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 12/15/19 16:40 1
15
Toluene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/15/19 16:40 1

LToluene-d8 (Surr) 95 60 - 140 12/15/19 16:40 1
iGeneral Chemistry
LTotal Dissolved Solids 780 10 mg/L 12/17/19 09:10 1
Page 6 of 20 12/19/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANK Lab Sample ID: 720-96482-2
3
4
7
8
9
Benzene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/15/19 17:08 1 10
Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 12/15/19 17:08 1
15
Toluene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/15/19 17:08 1

LToluene-d8 (Surr) 95 60 - 140 12/15/19 17:08 1
Page 7 of 20 12/19/2019
Surrogate Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
BFB DBFM TOL
720-96482-1 275NEC-EFT 95 101 95
720-96482-2 TRIP BLANK 95 107 95 6
MB 440-586032/4 Method Blank 93 105 96
7
Surrogate Legend
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 8
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
L TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr) 9

10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 8 of 20 12/19/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
MB MB 5
7
■9
8
Benzene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/15/19 12:16 1
Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 12/15/19 12:16 1 11
15
Toluene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/15/19 12:16 1
MB MB
LToluene-d8 (Surr) 96 60 - 140 12/15/19 12:16 1
Spike LCS LCS %Rec.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Page 9 of 20 12/19/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Method: 624.1 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
3
Spike LCS LCS %Rec.
5
- - - - - - - - - - - - -

6
Benzene
Bromoform
Bromomethane
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
27.9
36.4
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
100
112
146
75 - 125
57 - 156
10 - 206
■9
8

Chloroform 25.0 26.1 ug/L 104 68 - 121
13
14
15
Toluene 25.0 23.9 ug/L 96 75 - 134
LCS LCS

MB MB
Spike LCS LCS %Rec.
L- - - - - - - - - - -
Analyte
Added
1000
Result Qualifier
974
Unit
mg/L
D %Rec
97
Limits
90 - 110 --
Page 10 of 20 12/19/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
GC/MS VOA
3
720-96482-1 275NEC-EFT Total/NA Water 624.1
720-96482-2 TRIP BLANK Total/NA Water 624.1 5
MB 440-586032/4 Method Blank Total/NA Water 624.1
LLCS 440-586032/1002 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 624.1 6

General Chemistry 7
8
1- - - - - - - -
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type
- -
Matrix Method Prep Batch
■
720-96482-1 275NEC-EFT Total/NA Water SM 2540C
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 11 of 20 12/19/2019
Lab Chronicle 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
i
-
Prep Type
-
Batch
Type
Batch
Method Run
Dil
Factor
Initial
Amount
Final
Amount
Batch
Number
Prepared
or Analyzed Analyst Lab 5
Total/NA Analysis 624.1 1 10 mL 10 mL 586032 12/15/19 16:40 JB TAL IRV
LTotal/NA Analysis SM 2540C 1 100 mL 100 mL 586378 12/17/19 09:10 XL TAL IRV 6
Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANK Lab Sample ID: 720-96482-2 7
Date Received: 12/10/19 14:19 8
iPrep Type
Batch
Type
Batch
Method Run
Dil
Factor
Initial
Amount
Final
Amount
Batch
Number
Prepared
or Analyzed Analyst Lab 9
LTotal/NA Analysis 624.1 1 10 mL 10 mL 586032 12/15/19 17:08 JB TAL IRV
■
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 12 of 20 12/19/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
■56


Alaska State CA01531 06-30-20
Arizona State AZ0671 10-14-20 8
California Los Angeles County Sanitation 10256 06-30-20
California
Districts
State 2706 06-30-20
9
Guam State 19-005R 01-23-20
Hawaii State CA01531 01-29-20
10
■
Nevada State CA015312020-4 07-31-20
11
New Mexico State CA01531 01-29-20
Oregon NELAP 4028 - 006 01-29-20 12
US Fish & Wildlife US Federal Programs 058448 07-31-20
USDA US Federal Programs P330-18-00214 07-09-21 13
Washington State C900 09-03-20
14
15
Page 13 of 20 12/19/2019
Method Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
624.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) 40CFR136A TAL IRV
4
5
7
TAL IRV = Eurofins TestAmerica, Irvine, 17461 Derian Ave, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92614-5817, TEL (949)261-1022 8
9
10
11
■
12
13
14
15
Page 14 of 20 12/19/2019
Sample Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
720-96482-1 275NEC-EFT Water 12/10/19 09:50 12/10/19 14:19
720-96482-2 TRIP BLANK Water 12/10/19 00:00 12/10/19 14:19
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
■
13
14
15
Page 15 of 20 12/19/2019
720 .. tl[fff:z,_ i,.ocus CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ~/93f~1 SERIAL NO .
/V!.E C----~
.··· TECHNOLOGIES (See Reverse for Instructions) (7, 1514'1
' '•-u-~ .. ., u••- . SAMPLERS - -- - - ~ ~- - - -- SAMPLE CONTAINER ~MPLE DESCRIPTION CODES TAT CODES
,...,7 ~-,.., . .,
L Or.;, - £ ~ n--.
PROJECT NUMBER
0
, ,.c)~ a_
t.'r
"7/
(PRINT]
(SIGN)
DESCRIPTION CODES
/l{}40-ml VOA Vial
½( Glass Liter;;isi, E. Brass Tube
round Water F. Oil
urface Water ~aste .
C. Leachate . lank/Spike
(~tandard
2. 48 Hour
RECORDER '/fJ,.,-... a:;) Plastic - ,i,.../ F. Other _ _ D. Rinseate . Other _ __ 3. 24 Hour
(SI -'fl. Plaltic Liter _ __ _ E . Soil/Sediment _ _ __ 4. Other _ _
~ I NUMBER OF I ANALYiiiBEQUESTED ~ :i" :i" LABORATORY USE ONLY

,.,.,-;<' °ll 8
1-~
CONTAINERS \ I/ " lj g
ANALYTICAL LAB ~ ..r{- A;,,,,¾:,n~ i~
"
PREs~~ATtoN
.!!. ..___ _ ,-----; ~
, f¼I
'"'\I~ i -~]
c 3?._cu
~~
~ 8
LAB PROJECT NO.
-:- 5 ~ ._ \,: V .!. ~a 6- :: ~
1! "' ,, .c \J ~ alc;; E"" "'e ~
1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - ----I ·-E .g-;;I ~ Gl
M
O ..J
~ :-t--
al l':J: -'r ~
~ g:
:1.5~
.§>- _g B.
~ 1 - - --
£
- - - - -- ------1
SAMPLE
AVERAGE 8 ~ !! J ~ $ i( ii- ( . g- 1,1 ~ ~ ASSIGNED CONDITION
> - - -- - - - - -- - -< f .!! g- il: ~ \J r ~ :; :; ~ ~
<t
NOTES BOTTLE
TEMP COND pH ~ ~ ::, ~ ~ •~ ~ ;! c\!l _g NUMBERS UPON
NO. DATE TIME SAMPLE ID 0 c micromhos/cm (/) c\!l u: ('I fC \- RECEIPT
1 i:J-1"1' ~>O ::2..7~ .IV~ C -i-"":P1 \A i/4 "3 ~ )(
2 i' '7 >O K IA \\ "=- ) / )<
3 I, .4"A 7.,...,:0 A l ~ 4 l-i \'I ~ I"')<'
4 ...._ II fa/A -I e p,z,,,/J !{.~ C /., I >(
5 , -
6
7 •
B
Page 16 of 20
10 • .. - ----
9
11 -.... IIJ .J,.. NU i t::.!
12.
13
-? \ ~·
:,
lem ~,~~ rn Mm.
nnnr • ·•• M ~- M
• :11111
l !&I
I"""--' • .. ...
"'°" '
r
,
II~1 1
Iilll 1 1 ~II
14 "" -
15 I I I I I
16 II
NOTES/ MISCELLANEOUS Field/ Container Temp. ~~uishedJy.:P3ignature) ~pi\eiAJ By: (~n~~ Date Time
f~r r 7/j UL ril , r I l11 Joi) r; 1l ~ !5
/
lin }iJishi;tf V (Signature)J).ffu-li Received By: (!~gnature) ' I Date Time
ff t_ ~~r~ 6rlrflu. tt.1:,q
R linquished"By: (Signature) I Received By: (Signature) Date Time
Container Sealed with Custody Seal: Yes D No D
Method of Shipment Description of Other Chains-of-Custody Dispatched By: (Signature) Date Time Received for lab By: (Signature) Date Time
Transport Container Transported with this ~
Chain(bySerialNo.) /7/ . -~ _ ! :)/~ ,, p2.~(t>-IJ (-1/1,cj
-/./.....,e '"[,.~£ /J.. / Of 9.. 1 ~
A/',.;tA,L.,-V U~n11<- 0 ..OevH> f/Af~-n ·-,Vll"'-0,
0 MOUNTAIN VIEW• 299 FAIRCHILD DRIVE • MTN VIEW, CA 94043 • TEL (650) 960-1640 • FAX (650) 960-0739 6
0
/(?~
12/19/2019
WALNUT CREEK• 1701 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD• WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 • TEL (925) 906-8100 • FAX (925) 906-8101
0 OTHER _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ TEL _ _ _ _ FAX _ _ _ __
REV. 6/02
WHITE: Laboratcxy Copy YELLOW: Project Copy PINK: Database Copy
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1220 Quarry Lane
Chain of Custody Record lllffllllllllll -:::' eurofins Envnonmr. nt Test ing
TestAmcrrca
Phone: 925-484-1919 Fax: 925-600-3002

Sampler. Lab PM Carner Tracking No(s) COCNo.
Client Information (Sub Contract Lab) Smith, Micah no·).. s!_i:,_4 _l:!_J ":i. 9 720-44525.1
Client Contact Phone: E-Mail: State of Origin· P09e.
Shipp1ng/Receivmg micah.smith@testamericainc com California Page 1 of 1
!Company, AccredltaMns Required (See note ). Job#:
TestAmenca Laboratories, Inc 720-96482-1
Addtess Due Date Requested: Preservation Codes:
17461 Derian Ave, Sulte 100. 12/20/2019 Analysis Requested A-HCL
M - Hexane
c,ty: TAT Requested (days): '.,(' B - NaOH N- None
Irvine ~~ c. Zn Acetate O-AsNaO2
P -Na2O4S
I
State, zip ·\~ .. D • Nitric Acid
CA, 92614-5817 ,'l!j Lil ' E-NaHS04 Q . Na2SO3
, ~~ f!! F-MeOH R- Na2S2O3
Phone PO# ~:~. :E ' G • Amchlor S -H2SO4
949-261-1022(Tel) 949-260-3297(Fax) 1-s ~ ~ , H-Ascom1cAc1d T - TSP Dodecahydrate
U-Acetone
Email: WO#:
~ ' !:!c '' I - Ice
J-OI Water V-MCAA
II ~ ::~!
W - pH4-5
Project Name Project # 1 ' { A
NEC
Site
72014506
SSOW#
.
•
::I
0.
'
' '
Other:
Z - other (specify)
·J.1 _ _ _ _....J
.:S·
ii
!
Sample
Type
Matrix
(w-w-.
I• •... u
..,
Sample (C=comp, ,:;;::.;.., ; ,
i' ::'.•
•:;i J
Sample Identification• Client ID (Lab ID)
5<.1><· G= rab 8T•TlHtM',#Alr Special Instructions/Note:
Page 17 of 20
·~ n·Ccdlt: ,, '·· r ·. ·.:f ,. , ·I:.··, ',"I' ·.•':'• 1, 1 1, ..,,. ,,.~ f .1, ,\,•,'
09:50
275NEC-EFT (720-96482- 1) 12/10/19
Pacific
Water XIX 4
TRIP BLANK (720-96482-2) 12/10/19 f:>acific Water X ·:3
:,~,
Note Since laboratory accred1tat1ons are subJect to change, Eurofins- TestAmenca places the ownership of method, analyte & accreditation compliance upoll out subcontract laboratories. This sampfe shipment 1s forwarded under chaln--of.-eustody If the laboratory does not currently
ma1nta1n accred1tallon m the State of Ongm listed above for analysis/tests/matnx being analyzed, the samples must be shipped back to the Eurofins TestAmer1ca laboratory or other instructions W1U be provided Any changes to accred1taUon status should be brovght to Eurofins
ITestAmenca attenton 1mmed1ately if all requested accredttat:lons are current to date, return the signed Chain of Custody attesting to said complteance to Euroflns TestAmerica
Possible Hazard Identification S8mple Disposal ( A fee may be assessed If samples are retained longer than 1 month)
Unconfrrmed □ Return To Client □ Disposal By Lab □ Archive For Months
Deliverable Requested. I, II, Ill, IV, Other (specify) Primary Deliverable Rank. 2 Special Instructions/QC Requirements:
Empty Kit Relinquished by: Date: TIITle. 1Melhod of Shipmen!
1if[t',ftq /(po 0 12__ ~ Date/Time. Company

~
RehnquishedM,.,,i./4 Rece,vecfby
~fe1 Ii. /! 'jl.. /r 9 /O )') TA -.l"V"
Rellnqu,~ Oatemme Company Received by.t,1/ Date/Time· Company
12/19/2019
Re,mquished by- Oate/T1me Company ReceJVed by· Datertime. Company
Custody Seals Intact:

)i:.,.Yes 11 No
ICustody Seal No.: Cooler Temperalure(s) 'C and Other Rema,1<s:
. ~ /, 7 .tA - ()'1
Ver. Ul /1 612019
■
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
2

4
List Number: 1
5
meter. 7
tampered with. 9
13
HTs)
■
15
MS/MSDs
<6mm (1/4").

Page 18 of 20 12/19/2019
1
2

4
5
meter. 7
tampered with. 9
13
HTs)
■
15
MS/MSDs
<6mm (1/4").

Page 19 of 20 12/19/2019
1
2

4
5
meter. 7
tampered with. 9
13
HTs)
■
15
MS/MSDs
<6mm (1/4").

Page 20 of 20 12/19/2019
.;; eurofins ■12
Environment Testing
3
TestAmerica
4
5
ANALYTICAL REPORT
6
1220 Quarry Lane 7
Tel: (925)484-1919 8
For:
10
299 Fairchild Drive
14
15
12/19/2019 11:27:31 AM
(925)484-1919
·· ·· ·········· LINKS ........... .
Review your project

results through
TotalAccess
Have a Question.
. ,
The
Visit us at:
Project/Site: NEC
2
Table of Contents 3
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
5
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
9
8
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
10
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 11
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 12
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
20
13
14
15

Page 2 of 20 12/19/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
Qualifiers
3
GC/MS VOA
Qualifier Qualifier Description 4
* LCS or LCSD is outside acceptance limits.
Glossary 5
6
%R Percent Recovery
CFL Contains Free Liquid 7
CNF Contains No Free Liquid
DER Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference) 8
Dil Fac Dilution Factor
DL Detection Limit (DoD/DOE) 9
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry) 10
EDL Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
LOD Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE) 11
LOQ Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)
MDA Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry) 12
MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
13
NC Not Calculated
14
QC Quality Control 15
RER Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
Page 3 of 20 12/19/2019
Case Narrative 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
Job ID: 720-96481-1 3
4
Narrative
Job Narrative 5
720-96481-1
6
Comments
Receipt
9
GC/MS VOA
Method 8260B: The laboratory control sample (LCS) and / or laboratory control sample duplicate (LCSD) for analytical batch 720-277577 10
recovered outside control limits for the following analytes: 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane. These
analytes were biased high in the LCS and were not detected in the associated samples; therefore, the data have been reported.
11
Method 8260B: No MS/MSD were reported for the following samples due to an autosampler error: 275NEC-01AE (720-96481-1).
12
No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page.
13
14
15

Page 4 of 20 12/19/2019
Detection Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Analyte
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Result Qualifier
24
RL
0.50
MDL Unit
ug/L 1
-- - --
Dil Fac D Method
8260B
Prep Type
Total/NA 4
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.1 0.50 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA
LTrichloroethene 20 0.50 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA 5

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 5 of 20 12/19/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
Acetone ND 50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1 6
Benzene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
Bromobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
7
Chlorobromomethane ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
8
2-Butanone (MEK) ND 50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
9
n-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
sec-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1 10
tert-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
Carbon disulfide ND 5.0 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1 11
2-Chlorotoluene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1 14
4-Chlorotoluene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
15
1,1-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
Dibromomethane ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
1,2-Dichloroethane ND * 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
2-Hexanone ND 50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
Isopropylbenzene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
4-Isopropyltoluene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND 50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
Naphthalene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
N-Propylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
Styrene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
Page 6 of 20 12/19/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
Tetrachloroethene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1 6
Toluene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
7
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND * 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
8
9
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1 10
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND * 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1 11
Vinyl acetate ND 10 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1
Vinyl chloride ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 17:18 1 12
4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 67 - 130 12/17/19 17:18 1
14
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 123 72 - 130 12/17/19 17:18 1
15
LToluene-d8 (Surr) 100 70 - 130 12/17/19 17:18 1
Page 7 of 20 12/19/2019
Surrogate Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
BFB DCA TOL
720-96481-1 275NEC-01AE 100 123 100
LCSD 720-277577/6 Lab Control Sample Dup 106 116 102
MB 720-277577/4 Method Blank 105 119 100
7
Surrogate Legend
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8
DCA = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
L TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr) 9

10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 8 of 20 12/19/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
MB MB 5
Methyl tert-butyl ether ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1 6
Acetone ND 50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
Benzene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
7
■9
Bromobenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
Chlorobromomethane ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
8
Bromoform ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
2-Butanone (MEK) ND 50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
n-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1 10
sec-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
tert-Butylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1 11
Carbon disulfide ND 5.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
15
1,1-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
Dibromomethane ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
2-Hexanone ND 50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
Isopropylbenzene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
4-Isopropyltoluene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND 50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
Naphthalene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
N-Propylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
Styrene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
Page 9 of 20 12/19/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
MB MB
5
6
Toluene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
7
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
ND
ND
1.0
0.50
0.50
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
12/17/19 12:10
12/17/19 12:10
12/17/19 12:10
1
1
1
■9
8

Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1 10
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 1.0 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1 11
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.50 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1 12
Vinyl acetate ND 10 ug/L 12/17/19 12:10 1
13
14
MB MB
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 15
4-Bromofluorobenzene 105 67 - 130 12/17/19 12:10 1
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 119 72 - 130 12/17/19 12:10 1
LToluene-d8 (Surr) 100 70 - 130 12/17/19 12:10 1
iLab Sample ID: LCS 720-277577/5

Matrix: Water
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Prep Type: Total/NA
Spike LCS LCS %Rec.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Acetone 125 109 ug/L 87 61 - 147
Benzene 25.0 26.4 ug/L 106 79 - 119
Dichlorobromomethane 25.0 29.9 ug/L 120 81 - 130
Bromobenzene 25.0 27.3 ug/L 109 77 - 117
Chlorobromomethane 25.0 27.7 ug/L 111 81 - 122
Bromoform 25.0 30.7 ug/L 123 75 - 127
2-Butanone (MEK) 125 131 ug/L 105 66 - 133
n-Butylbenzene 25.0 28.0 ug/L 112 78 - 119
sec-Butylbenzene 25.0 27.8 ug/L 111 78 - 118
tert-Butylbenzene 25.0 28.3 ug/L 113 78 - 118
Carbon disulfide 25.0 26.3 ug/L 105 64 - 127
Chloroform 25.0 28.8 ug/L 115 82 - 119
2-Chlorotoluene 25.0 26.7 ug/L 107 75 - 115
Page 10 of 20 12/19/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
Spike LCS LCS %Rec.
5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4-Chlorotoluene 25.0 27.5 ug/L 110 73 - 119

6
1,3-Dichloropropane
1,1-Dichloropropene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
25.0
25.0
25.0
26.2
28.0
27.9
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
105
112
112
77 - 117
83 - 130
74 - 126
■9
8

Dibromomethane 25.0 27.2 ug/L 109 79 - 117 10
1,1-Dichloroethane 25.0 26.1 ug/L 105 77 - 119 11
1,2-Dichloroethane 25.0 31.8 * ug/L 127 73 - 122
13
14
Hexachlorobutadiene 25.0 29.4 ug/L 118 78 - 140
15
2-Hexanone 125 123 ug/L 99 63 - 140
Isopropylbenzene 25.0 29.1 ug/L 117 77 - 130
4-Isopropyltoluene 25.0 28.5 ug/L 114 80 - 120
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 125 122 ug/L 98 66 - 140
Naphthalene 25.0 26.8 ug/L 107 81 - 121
N-Propylbenzene 25.0 27.2 ug/L 109 77 - 117
Styrene 25.0 28.2 ug/L 113 76 - 116
Toluene 25.0 27.5 ug/L 110 75 - 120
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 25.0 32.9 * ug/L 132 74 - 130
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 25.0 27.1 ug/L 109 77 - 120
ne
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 25.0 28.9 ug/L 115 75 - 115
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 25.0 28.6 ug/L 114 77 - 117
Vinyl acetate 25.0 24.3 ug/L 97 50 - 126
o-Xylene 25.0 28.5 ug/L 114 77 - 118
Page 11 of 20 12/19/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
LCS LCS
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4
4-Bromofluorobenzene 104 67 - 130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 118 72 - 130 5
6
■9
Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD
8
Methyl tert-butyl ether 25.0 28.9 ug/L 116 70 - 130 1 20
Acetone 125 124 ug/L 99 61 - 147 13 30
Benzene 25.0 26.1 ug/L 104 79 - 119 1 20
Bromobenzene 25.0 27.4 ug/L 110 77 - 117 1 20
Chlorobromomethane 25.0 27.6 ug/L 111 81 - 122 0 20 11
Bromoform 25.0 31.2 ug/L 125 75 - 127 2 20
Bromomethane 25.0 27.5 ug/L 110 70 - 132 0 20 12
2-Butanone (MEK) 125 134 ug/L 107 66 - 133 2 22
n-Butylbenzene 25.0 28.1 ug/L 112 78 - 119 0 20 13
sec-Butylbenzene 25.0 28.5 ug/L 114 78 - 118 3 20
tert-Butylbenzene 25.0 28.9 ug/L 116 78 - 118 2 20 14
Carbon disulfide 25.0 26.4 ug/L 105 64 - 127 0 20
Carbon tetrachloride 25.0 35.2 ug/L 141 72 - 142 0 20
15
Chloroform 25.0 28.5 ug/L 114 82 - 119 1 20
2-Chlorotoluene 25.0 27.2 ug/L 109 75 - 115 2 20
4-Chlorotoluene 25.0 28.1 ug/L 112 73 - 119 2 20
1,1-Dichloropropene 25.0 28.4 ug/L 113 83 - 130 1 20
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 25.0 27.7 ug/L 111 74 - 126 1 20
Dibromomethane 25.0 26.9 ug/L 108 79 - 117 1 20
1,2-Dichloroethane 25.0 31.0 * ug/L 124 73 - 122 3 20
1,1-Dichloroethene 25.0 26.6 ug/L 107 69 - 119 1 20
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 25.0 27.8 ug/L 111 82 - 119 0 20
Hexachlorobutadiene 25.0 29.3 ug/L 117 78 - 140 0 20
2-Hexanone 125 126 ug/L 101 63 - 140 2 24
Isopropylbenzene 25.0 29.4 ug/L 118 77 - 130 1 20
Page 12 of 20 12/19/2019
QC Sample Results 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD
5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4-Isopropyltoluene 25.0 29.1 ug/L 116 80 - 120 2 20

6
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 125 126 ug/L 101 66 - 140 3 21
Naphthalene 25.0 27.4 ug/L 109 81 - 121 2 20
7
N-Propylbenzene 25.0 27.8 ug/L 111 77 - 117 2 20
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
25.0
25.0
25.0
28.2
29.5
25.1
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
113
118
100
76 - 116
81 - 121
70 - 115
0
0
5
20
20
20
■9
8

Toluene 25.0 26.9 ug/L 107 75 - 120 2 20 10
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 25.0 28.6 ug/L 114 78 - 120 0 20 11
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 25.0 25.8 ug/L 103 80 - 117 1 20 12
Trichloroethene 25.0 27.8 ug/L 111 80 - 123 2 20
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 25.0 27.9 ug/L 111 77 - 120 3 20
13
ne
14
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 25.0 28.9 * ug/L 116 75 - 115 0 20
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 25.0 29.1 ug/L 116 77 - 117 2 20 15
Vinyl acetate 25.0 24.5 ug/L 98 50 - 126 1 20
o-Xylene 25.0 28.1 ug/L 112 77 - 118 1 20
LCSD LCSD
4-Bromofluorobenzene 106 67 - 130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 116 72 - 130
Page 13 of 20 12/19/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
GC/MS VOA
3

7
8
■9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 14 of 20 12/19/2019
Lab Chronicle 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
i Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared
5
L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Prep Type
Total/NA
Type
Analysis
Method
8260B
Run Factor
1
Amount
10 mL
Amount
10 mL
Number
277577
or Analyzed Analyst
12/17/19 17:18 AJS
Lab
TAL PLS
6
7
8
9
■
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 15 of 20 12/19/2019
Project/Site: NEC 2
■56
7
8
9
10
■
11
12
13
14
15
Page 16 of 20 12/19/2019
Method Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
■
12
13
14
15
Page 17 of 20 12/19/2019
Sample Summary 1
Project/Site: NEC 2
3
720-96481-1 275NEC-01AE Water 12/10/19 10:45 12/10/19 14:19
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
■
13
14
15
Page 18 of 20 12/19/2019
••·OCUS
...
7Z~· l//?"HJ Atf'3[?1.~ SERIAL NO.
TECHNOLOGIES CHAIN-6F-CUSTQOV"lfECQRD (See Reverse for ,;tfuctions) .?'_,I 151'1~
PROJECT NAME _lf/'£C.. SAMPLERS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
SAMPLE CONTAINER SAMPLE DESCRIPTION CODES TAT CODES
(PRINT}
PROJECT NUMBER C, f?-c) 0 '7 -9 9 -~;J..-& 0 DESCRIPTION CODES
fA') 40-ml VOA Vial
~ Ground Water
Surface Water
F.
G.
Oil
Waste ~ Standard
(SIGN)
RECORDER ~..rf=A-'1-1- €rt-~ ½{ Glass Liter
C. Plastic 500-ml
E. Brass Tube
F. Other _ __
C. Leachate
D. Rinseate
H.
I.
Blank/Spike
Other _ __
2. 48 Hour
3. 24 Hour
(SIGN} D. Plastic Liter E. SoiVSediment 4. Other _ __
,;- i NUMBER OF I ANALYSIS REQUESTED Ii" :i'~ LABORATORY USE ONLY

°8 8 CONTAINERS 1
8
ANALYTICAL l..AB '(e.s,f A1?-ter1 t:4..- ~
E 5l
Ii ANO
I
"' "C
!!::!. !::!.~l-- - - -------------=-----i
! ~ ~ LAB PROJECT NO.
.!.
0
·a
PRESERVATION
'c' t--~~~-, C
.!!.
"C
~a~
E""
....
p ft
- 0..
:,Ea:
·.:: I",
i ·{i
E•--c ; i~--=----,------,--;:;--;:-;--;;::;;--;:::--,
AVERAGE ! ~ g :,
.,
<T
a: :E ~
.9:!
(/)
I~
<( ASSIGNED
SAMPLE
CONDITION
NO. I DATE j TIME l SAMPLE ID . .

TEMP
·c
COND
micromhos/cm
pH s E o
&l z
NOTES BOTTLE
NUMBERS
UPON
RECEIPT
1
2
p.-/ bi~ / 1)4, 5. -;i.., 7SLV£C..-~t
•
~=-t-- - + - - - - - 1 --f-'-t'--+t--t--l'=-t--+- +l"-t--+-+-+-+-+-+--+- +l-+---+-+-l------+----+ ----1
3
4
5
6
7 •
a ·+-t--t-·· 1r1--r1111H--t t-t--+-H----+-- --i----
Page 19 of 20
9
10
1 I i;
15
I I I I I · I____ _ ILU-!:!o4~1 Chain of Custody ,I
16 I I I I I I II 1 lr
NOTES/ MISCELLANEOUS Field/ Container Temp. 1Reli~gnature) ~f1'ed ~: (Sig~ Date Time ,,-
~~----
lin is
1·
~ (Signature/,-10~ I
I IA /iA
Rk'eivedBy: (Signlture)
IJ/1J/q
1 1 ' bate I
(!nti
Time
h'b'e""lin""q'1.-
uis+h°"
ed=B-'-!Z{~ure) /'£'11 Received By: (Signature) Date
1
1
Time I
Container Sealed with Custody Seal: Yes D No0
Method of Shipment I Description of Other Chains-of-Custody Dispatched By: (Signature) Date Time Date Time
~~e~ /.2-itJ--t?
ll-ro--1~\ t f / 9'
Send Lab Results to (Name): /V'«l"'-o/ 0e~4~ Le ..Pev--re/4Ltv~':1:4-. (Check Office Below) Verbals Requested: Yes D No D
0
0
MOUNTAIN VIEW• 299 FAIRCHILD DRIVE• MTN VIEW, CA 94043 • TEL (650) 960-1640 • FAX (650) 960-0739 ,
12/19/2019
WALNUT CREEK• 1701 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD• WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 • TEL (925) 906-8100 • FAX (925) 906-8101
0
0
OTHER _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ TEL _ _ _ _ _ FAX _ _ _ __
I.be
REV.6/02
WHITE: Laboratory Copy YELLOW: Project Copy PINK: Database Copy
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
2

4
List Number: 1
5
meter. 7
tampered with. 9
13
HTs)
■
15
MS/MSDs
<6mm (1/4").

Page 20 of 20 12/19/2019
APPENDIX D
Annual Quality Assurance Report

Table D-1
Comparison of Analytical Laboratory Quality Control Results
Accuracy Accuracy
Date Laboratory Precision
Method Analyte Spike % Duplicate % (2)
Analyzed Batch Number RPD
REC (1) REC (1)
EPA 624 3/8/2019 268441 1,1-Dichloroethene 99 94 4.6
Batch Spike Benzene 105 105 0.4
Trichloroethene 98 98 0.1
Toluene 95 93 2.2
Chlorobenzene 98 96 1.2
EPA 8260B 3/8/2019 268441 1,1-Dichloroethene 99 94 4.6
Batch Spike MTBE 90 92 3.1
Benzene 105 105 0.4
Toluene 95 93 2.2
Ethylbenzene 94 93 0.9
m,p-xylenes 96 95 0.7
o-xylenes 97 98 1.1
EPA 624 3/11/2019 268494 1,1-Dichloroethene 106 105 0.7
Batch Spike Benzene 109 107 1.3
Toluene 92 91 1.5
EPA 624 6/20/2019 555711 1,1-Dichloroethene 104 -- --
Batch Spike Trichloroethene 93 -- --
Chlorobenzene 98 -- --
Batch Spike Trichloroethene 93 92 0.4
Project Average 100 97 1.4
Project Goals 40-150 40-150 <35
Notes:
(1) % REC - Percent recovery
(2) RPD - Relative percent difference between the batch spike and batch spike duplicate.
P:\PRJ2003REM\NEC_501 Ellis Street\WR0434\EPA Annual Reports\2019 Annual\Appendices\Appendix D - Quality Assurance Report\AppD_QAQC Tables_2019AppD_QAQC Tables_2019
Table D-2
Summary of Blank Sample Results
Laboratory Batch Concentration Reporting Limit

Blank Type Date Sampled Method Blank ID Contaminant
Number (µg/L) (µg/L)
3/4/2019 EPA 624 268441 307905-002 -- ND 0.5 - 10

Trip
12/10/2019 EPA 624 586032 720-96482-2 -- ND 0.5 - 2.0
3/8/2019 EPA 624 268441 QC967563 -- ND 0.5 - 10
3/8/2019 EPA 8260B 268441 QC967563 -- ND 0.5 - 20
3/11/2019 EPA 624 268494 QC967800 -- ND 0.5 - 10
6/20/2019 EPA 624 555711 440-555711/4 -- ND 0.5 - 2.0
Lab Blank 6/20/2019 EPA 8260B 268680 720-268680/5 -- ND 0.5 - 1.0
9/11/2019 EPA624 569819 440-569819/7 -- ND 0.5 - 2.0
9/11/2019 EPA 8260B 272829 720-272829/4 -- ND 0.5 - 5.0
12/10/2019 EPA 624 586032 440-586032/4 -- ND 0.5 - 2.0
12/10/2019 EPA 8260B 277577 720-277577/4 -- ND 0.5 - 50
Notes:
-- - not available
ND - non detect
Table D-3
Duplicate Quality Control Results
Groundwater Monitoring Wells

NEC-01AE DUPLICATE
Sample
Contaminant (307897-001) (307897-002) RPD1
Date g/L) g/L) %
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 26 29 10.9
3/4/2019
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.5 2.9 14.8
Project Average 10.2
Project Goals <35
Notes:
1
RPD = relative percent difference = |X1-X2|/X3 x 100
where:
X 1 = concentration of the sample
X 2 = concentration of the duplicate
X 3 = average of X1 and X2
APPENDIX E
VOC Concentration Mann-Kendall Trend
Analysis

Table E-1
Mann Kendall Statistical Test Summary Table
501 Ellis Street, Mountain View, CA
2018 VOC Data Trend through 2018 (90% CL)

Well TCE cDCE VC TCE cDCE VC
NEC-1A 23 14 < 0.5 Decreasing Increasing <RL
NEC-1AE 3.1 32 < 0.5 Decreasing Increasing <RL
NEC-7A 53 10 < 0.5 No Trend No Trend <RL
NEC-8A 83 11 < 0.5 Decreasing No Trend <RL
NEC-9A 2.7 32 < 0.5 Decreasing Decreasing <RL
NEC-10A 15 6.0 < 0.5 Decreasing No Trend <RL
NEC-12A 2.2 5.5 < 0.5 No Trend Increasing <RL
NEC-20A < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Decreasing No Trend <RL
NEC-21A 0.6 < 0.5 < 0.5 Decreasing Decreasing <RL
NEC-22A 22 19 < 0.5 Decreasing No Trend <RL
NEC-23A 17 98 < 0.5 No Trend Increasing <RL
NEC-24A 23 39 < 0.5 Decreasing Increasing <RL
NEC-26A 21 100 0.5 Decreasing Increasing No Trend
NEC-27AE 59 10 < 0.5 Decreasing Decreasing <RL
NEC-28AE 45 31 < 0.5 Decreasing Increasing <RL
NEC-PZ-1A 51 5.2 < 0.5 Increasing No Trend <RL
NEC-PZ-2A 70 8.7 < 0.5 Increasing No Trend <RL
NEC-PZ-3A 5.1 28 < 0.5 Decreasing No Trend <RL
Notes:
VOC = volatile organic compound
CL = confidence limit
TCE = trichloroethene
cDCE = cis-1,2-dichloroethene
VC = vinyl chloride
< RL = concentrations below reporting limits
P:\PRJ2003REM\NEC_501 Ellis Street\WR0434\EPA Annual Reports\2018 Annual\Appendices\App E Mann Kendall\TblE-1_MannKendall Summary.xlsxTblE-1_MannKendall Summary.xlsx
VOC Concentration Trend Analysis Geosyntec Consultants
State of Wisconsin Mann-Kendall Statistical Test

Department of Natural Resources Form 4400-215 (2/2001)
Remediation and Redevelopment Program
Notice: This form is the DNR supplied spreadsheet referenced in Appendices A of Comm 46 and NR 746, Wis. Adm. Code. It is provided to
consultants as an optional tool for groundwater contaminant trend analysis to support site closure requests under s. Comm 46.07, Comm 46.08,
NR 746.07, NR 746.08, Wis. Adm. Code. Use this form or a manual method when seeking case closure under those rules. Earlier versions of this
form should not be used.
Instructions: Do not change formulas or other information in cells with a blue background, only cells with a yellow background are used for data
entry. To use the spreadsheet, provide at least four rounds and not more than ten rounds of data that is not seasonally affected. Use consistent units.
The spreadsheet contains several error checks, and a data entry error may cause "DATA ERR" or "DATE ERR" to be displayed. Dates that are not
consecutive will show an error message and will not display the test results. The spreadsheet tests the data for both increasing and decreasing trends
at both 80 percent and 90 percent confidence levels. If a declining trend is present at 80 percent but not at 90 percent, a site is still eligible for closure
under Comm 46 and NR 746 provided that other conditions in those rules are met. If an increasing or decreasing trend is not present, an additional
coefficient of variation test is used to test for stability, as proposed by Wiedemeier et al, 1999. For additional information, refer to the Interim Guidance
on Natural Attenuation for Petroleum Releases, dated October 1999. Refer to the guidance for recommendations on data entry for non-detect values.
Site Name =NEC - 501 Ellis Street BRRTS No. = Well Number = NEC-1A
Compound -> TCE c,1,2, DCE
Concentration Concentration Concentration Concentration Concentration Concentration
Event Sampling Date (leave blank (leave blank (leave blank (leave blank (leave blank (leave blank
Number (most recent last) if no data) if no data) if no data) if no data) if no data) if no data)
1 4-Dec-08 150 8.9
2 18-Dec-09 79 14
3 21-Dec-10 83 23
4 11-Oct-11 74 28
5 9-Oct-12 58 37
6 15-Oct-13 64 41
7 24-Oct-14 55 36
8 24-Oct-15 78 37
9 30-Sep-16 110 36
10 11-Oct-18 23 14
Mann Kendall Statistic (S) = -19.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Number of Rounds (n) = 10 10 0 0 0 0
Average = 77.40 27.49 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Standard Deviation = 33.988 11.729 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Coefficient of Variation(CV)= 0.439 0.427 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Error Check, Blank if No Errors Detected n<4 n<4 n<4 n<4
Trend ≥ 80% Confidence Level DECREASING INCREASING n<4 n<4 n<4 n<4
ITrend ≥ 90% Confidence Level
Stability Test, If No Trend Exists at
I
DECREASING I INCREASING I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4
80% Confidence Level NA NA n<4 n<4 n<4 n<4
Data Entry By = CB Date = 5-Mar-18 Checked By = MB

Site Name =NEC - 501 Ellis Street BRRTS No. = Well Number = NEC-1AE
1 4-Dec-08 160 20
2 16-Dec-09 38 22
3 13-Dec-10 49 27
4 12-Dec-11 43 35
5 17-Dec-12 40 38
6 16-Dec-13 56 47
7 18-Dec-14 96 54
8 14-Dec-15 36 33
9 19-Dec-16 34 54
10 13-Dec-18 21 32
I
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4
Data Entry By = cb Date = 5-Mar-19 Checked By = MB

1 2-Dec-08 66 10
2 21-Dec-09 61 10
3 21-Dec-10 75 14
4 11-Oct-11 92 15
5 9-Oct-12 77 15
6 15-Oct-13 96 17
7 24-Oct-14 79 11
8 23-Oct-15 60 13
9 30-Sep-16 84 18
10 11-Oct-18 53 10
Mann Kendall Statistic (S) = 1.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Trend ≥ 80% Confidence Level No Trend INCREASING n<4 n<4 n<4 n<4
I No Trend
CV <= 1
I No Trend I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4
80% Confidence Level STABLE NA n<4 n<4 n<4 n<4

1 2-Dec-08 120 11
2 21-Dec-09 120 9.9
3 20-Dec-10 85 6.9
4 11-Oct-11 97 10
5 9-Oct-12 110 11
6 15-Oct-13 110 12
7 24-Oct-14 100 9.3
8 23-Oct-15 78 4.6
9 30-Sep-16 86 7.7
10 11-Oct-18 83 11
Mann Kendall Statistic (S) = -23.0 -4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Trend ≥ 80% Confidence Level DECREASING No Trend n<4 n<4 n<4 n<4
I
DECREASING I No Trend
CV <= 1
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4
80% Confidence Level NA STABLE n<4 n<4 n<4 n<4

1 2-Dec-08 15 55
2 21-Dec-09 9.3 54
3 21-Dec-10 2.7 45
4 11-Oct-11 3.6 39
5 9-Oct-12 3.7 43
6 15-Oct-13 3 40
7 25-Oct-14 2.2 31
8 23-Oct-15 2.5 40
9 30-Sep-16 3.1 36
10 11-Oct-18 2.7 32
Mann Kendall Statistic (S) = -22.0 0.0-32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Average = 4.78 41.50
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Standard Deviation = 4.136 8.127
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Coefficient of Variation(CV)= 0.865 0.196
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Trend ≥ 80% Confidence Level DECREASING DECREASING n<4 n<4 n<4 n<4
I
DECREASING DECREASING I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4

1 2-Dec-08 28 8.2
2 18-Dec-09 25 8.9
3 21-Dec-10 23 8.6
4 11-Oct-11 22 5.1
5 9-Oct-12 19 7.1
6 15-Oct-13 20 9.2
7 24-Oct-14 20 6.7
8 23-Oct-15 21 9.7
9 30-Sep-16 18 9.2
10 11-Oct-18 15 6
I
CV <= 1
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4
Data Entry By = CB Date = 6-Mar-19 Checked By = MB

1 3-Dec-08 26 2.8
2 18-Dec-09 26 2.8
3 22-Dec-10 22 2.8
4 11-Oct-11 22 2.8
5 9-Oct-12 22 3.5
6 15-Oct-13 22 3.7
7 24-Oct-14 21 2.5
8 23-Oct-15 29 4.5
9 30-Sep-16 21 3.5
10 11-Oct-18 15 3.4
I
DECREASING I No Trend I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4

1 3-Dec-08 34.36 5.2
2 22-Dec-09 13 5.2
3 22-Dec-10 0.6 2
4 11-Oct-11 1.2 2.5
5 15-Oct-12 1.2 4.9
6 14-Oct-13 1.6 9.1
7 24-Oct-14 1.6 7.5
8 24-Oct-15 2.9 18
9 1-Oct-16 2.4 12
10 6-Oct-18 2.2 5.5
I No Trend
CV > 1
I INCREASING I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4
80% Confidence Level NON-STABLE NA n<4 n<4 n<4 n<4

Compound -> TCE c-DCE
1 3-Dec-08 0.6 0.6
2 21-Dec-09 0.6 0.5
3 22-Dec-10 1.6 0.7
4 11-Oct-11 1.3 0.5
5 15-Oct-12 1.1 0.5
6 14-Oct-13 0.5 0.5
7 24-Oct-14 0.6 0.5
8 24-Oct-15 0.5 0.5
9 1-Oct-16 0.5 0.5
10 6-Oct-18 0.5 0.5
Average = 0.78 #DIV/0! 0.53 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
I
DECREASING No TrendI n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4

1 3-Dec-08 4.7 21
2 22-Dec-09 5.8 29
3 22-Dec-10 5.6 18
4 11-Oct-11 4 15
5 15-Oct-12 4.4 13
6 14-Oct-13 3.1 6.1
7 24-Oct-14 3 3.5
8 24-Oct-15 2.9 4.5
9 1-Oct-16 2.5 2.9
10 6-Oct-18 0.6 0.5
Average = 3.66 11.35
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
I
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4

1 3-Dec-08 74 39
2 22-Dec-09 41 48
3 22-Dec-10 63 42
4 11-Oct-11 22 24
5 15-Oct-12 26 28
6 14-Oct-13 25 28
7 24-Oct-14 17 20
8 24-Oct-15 24 37
9 1-Oct-16 23 42
10 6-Oct-18 22 19
Average = 33.70 32.70
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
I
DECREASING No TrendI n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4

1 3-Dec-08 92 27
2 22-Dec-09 84 34
3 22-Dec-10 82 24
4 11-Oct-11 83 30
5 15-Oct-12 81 28
6 14-Oct-13 87 37
7 24-Oct-14 91 29
8 24-Oct-15 93 38
9 1-Oct-16 90 40
10 6-Oct-18 17 98
I No Trend
CV <= 1
I INCREASING I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4
80% Confidence Level STABLE NA n<4 n<4 n<4 n<4

1 3-Dec-08 52 35
2 22-Dec-09 54 45
3 22-Dec-10 53 35
4 11-Oct-11 35 38
5 15-Oct-12 45 49
6 14-Oct-13 39 51
7 24-Oct-14 38 44
8 24-Oct-15 34 48
9 1-Oct-16 35 54
10 6-Oct-18 23 39
I
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4

1 3-Dec-08 39 7.4
2 22-Dec-09 35 9.9
3 22-Dec-10 40 5.7
4 11-Oct-11 31 6.2
5 15-Oct-12 34 5.8
6 14-Oct-13 33 8.4
7 24-Oct-14 34 4.6
8 24-Oct-15 33 5.4
9 1-Oct-16 34 7
10 6-Oct-18 26 6.8
Mann Kendall Statistic (S) = -21.0 -9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
I
CV <= 1
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4

Compound -> TCE c,1,2, DCE VC
1 3-Dec-08 94 3.4
2 22-Dec-09 180 5.6
3 22-Dec-10 130 3
4 11-Oct-11 140 5.6
5 15-Oct-12 120 4.9
6 14-Oct-13 160 7.5
7 24-Oct-14 91 3.8
8 24-Oct-15 3 71
9 1-Oct-16 24 59
10 6-Oct-18 21 100 0.5
Average = 96.30 26.38 0.50 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
I
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4

1 4-Dec-08 100 12
2 18-Dec-09 94 10
3 22-Dec-10 88 10
4 11-Oct-11 88 8.8
5 9-Oct-12 96 11
6 15-Oct-13 90 11
7 24-Oct-14 89 7.7
8 24-Oct-15 69 8.3
9 1-Oct-16 67 7.5
10 6-Oct-18 59 10
Average = 84.00 #DIV/0! 9.63 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
I
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4

1 4-Dec-08 95 26
2 18-Dec-09 99 29
3 22-Dec-10 80 23
4 11-Oct-11 91 27
5 9-Oct-12 72 30
6 15-Oct-13 80 28
7 24-Oct-14 70 44
8 24-Oct-15 72 32
9 1-Oct-16 64 34
10 6-Oct-18 45 31
I
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4

Site Name =NEC - 501 Ellis Street BRRTS No. = Well Number = NEC-PZ-1A
1 2-Dec-08 50 7.1
2 21-Dec-09 48 5.8
3 22-Dec-10 51 5
4 24-Oct-11 54 3.5
5 9-Oct-12 64 8.1
6 14-Oct-13 86 9.1
7 24-Oct-14 60 3.3
8 23-Oct-15 95 11
9 30-Sep-16 71 7.5
10 11-Oct-18 51 5.2
Trend ≥ 80% Confidence Level INCREASING No Trend n<4 n<4 n<4 n<4
I
INCREASING I No Trend
CV <= 1
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4

1 2-Dec-08 20 9.3
2 21-Dec-09 24 12
3 20-Dec-10 34 13
4 24-Oct-11 31 12
5 9-Oct-12 34 19
6 14-Oct-13 36 18
7 25-Oct-14 83 8.9
8 23-Oct-15 83 10
9 30-Sep-16 97 12
10 11-Oct-18 70 8.7
Mann Kendall Statistic (S) = 35.0 -8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Trend ≥ 80% Confidence Level INCREASING No Trend n<4 n<4 n<4 n<4
I
INCREASING I No Trend
CV <= 1
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4

1 27-Nov-07 87 12
2 2-Dec-08 77 12
3 21-Dec-09 66 11
4 20-Dec-10 58 11
5 24-Oct-11 49 22
6 9-Oct-12 52 15
7 14-Oct-13 50 21
8 24-Oct-14 47 9.9
9 30-Sep-16 4.1 37
10 11-Oct-18 5.1 28
I
DECREASING I No Trend I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4
n<4
I n<4 I
n<4
Data Entry By = cb Date = 5-Mar-19 Checked By =

Geosyntec: Consultants

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Geosyntec: Consultants

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SEMS-RM DOCID # 100020043

1111 Broadway, 6th Floor

Subject: 2019 Annual Progress Report

Dear Ms. Lee:

Matt Bacon, P.G. (CA)

Eric J. Suchomel, Ph.D., P.E. (CA)

Enclosure: 2019 Annual Progress Report

engineers I scientists I innovators

2019 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

Project Number: WR2814

April 15, 2020

2019 Annual Progress Report

Matt Bacon, P.G. (CA) Eric Suchomel, Ph.D., P.E. (CA)

Project Number: WR2814

April 15, 2020

2. GROUNDWATER REMEDY .................................................................................................5

3. OTHER 2019 ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................................10

5. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT – GROUNDWATER REMEDY ..........................................12

6. OPTIMIZATION PROGRESS ..............................................................................................13

7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................14

8. FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS .......................................................................................................16

9. UPCOMING WORK IN 2020 AND PLANNED FUTURE ACTIVITIES ...........................17

10. REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................18

Historical Data Included on CD (EPA Only)

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

µg/L micrograms per liter

ROD Record of Decision

• Adjust the groundwater extraction rates. Based on an evaluation of SCGWR system

1.4.2 Reporting Activities

Numerical simulations were performed using Visual MODFLOW Professional, Version

2.3.2 Estimated Capture Zones for 2019

in Table 5. A time-series concentration plot of selected VOCs in well NEC-1AE is provided in

3. OTHER 2019 ACTIVITIES

5. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT – GROUNDWATER REMEDY

7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

7.2 Vapor Intrusion

8.1 Groundwater Remedy

9. UPCOMING WORK IN 2020 AND PLANNED FUTURE

EPA. 1996. EPA Superfund Explanation of Significant Differences: Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman

2019 Annual Progress Report - 501 Ellis Street

SCGWR System Performance Summary

SCGWR System Performance Summary

SCGWR System Performance Summary

SCGWR System Performance Summary

Reference Elevation Depth to Water Groundwater

WELL ID NEC-1AE NEC-1AE NEC-1AE NEC-1AE

2019 Annual Progress Report - 501 Ellis Street

501 Ellis Street

Site Location Map

515 ELLIS STREET

158A 475 ELLIS STREET

Volume of Groundwater Extracted (MG)

Monitoring well shown in hydrograph Groundwater Elevations in Selected Monitoring Wells

475 ELLIS STREET

Legend Groundwater Elevation Contour Map

Simulated A Aquifer Capture Zone

Mountain View, California

First Quarter 2019

501 Ellis Street

Transmissivity: 91.3 ft2/day Extraction Rates (gpm)

501 ELLIS STREET

0.008 ft/ft, N28W

D:\GIS\NEC\Project\2019_AnnualReport\Fig06_CaptureZones1Q.mxd 3/13/2020 6:28:49 PM