Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The KSSR What Can Go Wrong
The KSSR What Can Go Wrong
KSSR stands for Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah. This is the new
thing in relation to education in the primary level. There are so many benefits
in the new system. As I had already mentioned in my earlier blog, the system
ensures that no child gets left behind an each child has to achieve a preset
standard of achievement before proceeding into the next level. The system
does not stress on exams. Evaluation takes into count student’s attitude,
focus, and leadership qualities apart from the content of the subject. This is to
ensure a total development of the child is taken into count and not just his
academic standing. The child is encouraged to seek, discover and give
opinions. The passive learner is a thing of the past. Technology is widely used
and students are taught to use technology to seek, learn and present material.
The blueprint for the KSSR was wonderful. All the elements were in place
and what was left was the implementation. This is where the problems begin.
As parents we should be aware of all the possible shortcomings so as to be
able to take the necessary remedial actions.
3. No Exams
My kids need exams to give them a target to work towards and I am sure
yours does too. Without exams, there is a risk that kids might not learn much.
This is not entirely true but than again all kids are different. Exams are a
measure of things that are yet to be mastered or the weakness of our
children. The earlier the intervention, the better the long-term effects. Parents
need to know what their kids are weak in and help them to catch up. Exams
also help in teacher evaluation. Some teachers do more than others. This is a
fact. Without the exams there is no real benchmark and this is worrying.
Parents should ensure that students do work at home even if there is no
homework. There are a wide variety of workbooks and academic material in
the market that parents should take advantage of.
4. Non-Measurable Evaluation
Many parents love examinations because evaluation is fair and
transparent. When evaluation is based on behaviour codes like leadership
qualities, responsibility and attitude, there will always be room for
unhappiness. Our teachers have to be absolutely fair and give the grades that
the student really deserves without taking any external factors into count. Can
they do this?