Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Polylactic Acid As A Material For Three-Dimensional Printing of Provisional Restorations
Polylactic Acid As A Material For Three-Dimensional Printing of Provisional Restorations
Polylactic Acid As A Material For Three-Dimensional Printing of Provisional Restorations
Purpose: To assess the marginal fit of provisional polylactic acid (PLA) crowns obtained
via three-dimensional (3D) printing using a profile projector. Materials and Methods:
A stone cast was scanned, and 15 provisional dental crowns were designed and printed
in PLA using a 0.2-mm nozzle and 135-degree build angle. The marginal fit was measured
at six points on each crown using a profile projector. Results and Conclusion: Within
the limitations of this study, the marginal fit of PLA provisional restorations was clinically
acceptable, and the results were comparable to those observed with polymethyl methacrylate
provisional restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:349–350. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5709
Fig 1 Design of the virtual crown with the printing parameters. Fig 2 PLA provisional crown.
Results
References
A descriptive analysis of the quantitative variables (DESCRIPTIVE and
EXPLORE processes) was carried out for the description of the mean 1. Givens EJ Jr, Neiva G, Yaman P, Dennison
measures, as shown in Table 2. JB. Marginal adaptation and color sta-
bility of four provisional materials.
J Prosthodont 2008;17:97–101.
Discussion 2. Dawood A, Marti Marti B, Sauret-
Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in
Since there are currently no studies that analyze the marginal fit of pro- dentistry. Br Dent J 2015;219:521–529.
visional PLA crowns nor crowns made using FDM technology, these 3. Osman RB, Alharbi NM, Wismeijer D.
Build angle: Does it influence the accu-
results cannot be directly compared; however, according to the litera-
racy of 3D-printed dental restorations
ture, the clinically acceptable marginal fit is limited to 120 μm.4 Givens using digital light-processing technol-
researched marginal fit of provisional crowns fabricated using direct ogy? Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:182–188.
manufacturing techniques and made of the materials polyethyl methac- 4. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The
rylate (PEMA), self-curing bis-acrylics, and dual-curing bis-acrylic, with estimation of cement film thickness by
an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:
results ranging from 177 μm (PEMA) to 319 μm (dual-curing bis-acrylic
107–111.
resin; Luxatemp).1 5. Ehrenberg D, Weiner GI, Weiner S. Long-
Another study by Ehrenberg measured the marginal fit of provisional term effects of storage and thermal
composite bis-acrylic and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) crowns cycling on the marginal adaptation of
after thermocycling. They obtained values between 323 and 499 μm provisional resin crowns: A pilot study.
J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:230–236.
in crowns made of bis-acrylic composite and 322 to 421 μm in crowns
made of PMMA.5