Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Minimize The Cost of The Steel Floor Framing Based On Fabrication Cost Data
Minimize The Cost of The Steel Floor Framing Based On Fabrication Cost Data
Minimize The Cost of The Steel Floor Framing Based On Fabrication Cost Data
under license.
Run Analysis!
This spreadsheet has been prepared by AISC Marketing in accordance with recognized
engineering principles and information made available to AISC at the time of its
preparation. While it is believed to be accurate, it has not been prepared for conventional
use as an engineering or construction document and should not be used or relied upon
for any specific application without competent professional examination and verification of
its accuracy, suitability and applicability by a licensed engineer, architect or other
professional. AISC disclaims any liability arising from the unauthorized use of the
information contained in this spreadsheet.
Date: Sample
Project: #REF!
Company: 0
Location: 0
Structural Steel
A-992 Steel, cost per Pound $0.22
Studs
Cost per Installed Stud $2.50
Stud spacing: 2 Stud spacing is not allowed to violate code requirements
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
2 Structural Steel
3 -992 Steel, cost per Pound $0.25
4
5
6 ts = 5.25
7 Flat slab=0
8 Studs 1 3 stud diameter
9 Cost per Installed Stud $3.00 Stud spacing: 1 0.75
10 Min Stud Spacing: parallel perpendicular
11 Longitudinal 4.5 3 3 3
12 Transverse 3 3 3 3
13 Max Stud Spacing:
14 Longitudinal 42 36 24 24
15 camber cost/beam 15
16 r1camber 1
17 Camber
18 Type of Cost Analysis: 2
19 ximum Camber in Range 1 15 in Minimum Camber 0.75 in
20 st per Member in Range 1 15.00 $/member Camber Increment 0.25 in
21 ximum Camber in Range 2 1.50 in Minimum Length
22 st per Member in Range 2 17.50 $/member
Cambered Members 25 ft
23 st per Member in Range 3 25.00 $/member Maximum Camber 2 in
24 Camber Non-Compact Members? 1 1
25 Vibration
26 perimposed Dead Load to include for vibration 15%
27 % of Live Load to include for vibration 10%
28
Parametric Bay Studies: Output Summary
Project Name: Sample
Scheme: Scheme 1
Project Location Anywhere USA
Company Company Name
Ananlzed by: Senior Engineer Date: 05/03/2002
Design Criteria
Beam Length = 25 ft Steel Design Code: ASD Ninth Edition Optimized for Cost
Girder Length = 25 ft Building Code: IBC 2000 Design for Vibration
Beam Spacing = 8.3 ft Office
Results for Floor System Designed for Strength and Deflection Limits
The Three Most Economical Beams and Girders are Shown Below
Beams Studs Camber $ Steel $ Studs $ Camber $ Total Vibration
W10X12 2 0.00" $0 $0 $0 $0 NG
W12X14 1 0.00" $0 $0 $0 $0 NG
W12X16 1 0.00" $0 $0 $0 $0 NG
Select a Beam and a Girder Below from the Optimal Choices Shown Above to Calculate Floor
System Cost and Weight
Choose Beam:W12X16
3 Combined Mode Vibration = OK
Floor Steel Weight = 2.48 lb/ft2
Choose Girder:W12X14 2 Floor Total Cost = $0.00 /ft2
This spreadsheet has been prepared by AISC Marketing in accordance with recognized
engineering principles and information made available to AISC at the time of its preparation.
While it is believed to be accurate, it has not been prepared for conventional use as an
engineering or construction document and should not be used or relied upon for any specific
application without competent professional examination and verification of its accuracy,
suitability and applicability by a licensed engineer, architect or other professional. AISC
disclaims any liability arising from the unauthorized use of the information contained in this
spreadsheet.
Parametric Bay Studies: Output Summary
Project Name: Sample
Scheme: Scheme 1
Project Location Anywhere USA
Company Company Name
Ananlzed by: Senior Engineer Date: 05/03/2002
Design Criteria
Beam Length = 25 ft Steel Design Code: ASD Ninth Edition
Optimized for Cost
Girder Length = 25 ft Building Code: IBC 2000 Design for Vibration
Beam Spacing = 8 ft Office
Results for Floor System Designed for Strength, Vibration and Delflection Limits
The Three Most Economical Combinations of Beams and Girders are Shown
Option #1 Studs Camber $ Steel $ Studs $ Camber $ Total
Beam 0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Girder 0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Floor Weight = #N/A lb/ft2
Floor Cost = #N/A /ft2
This spreadsheet has been prepared by AISC Marketing in accordance with recognized
engineering principles and information made available to AISC at the time of its preparation.
While it is believed to be accurate, it has not been prepared for conventional use as an
engineering or construction document and should not be used or relied upon for any specific
application without competent professional examination and verification of its accuracy,
suitability and applicability by a licensed engineer, architect or other professional. AISC
disclaims any liability arising from the unauthorized use of the information contained in this
spreadsheet.
Parametric Bay Studies: LRFD Composite Beam
Design
Project Name: Sample
Scheme: Scheme 1
Project Location Anywhere USA
Company Company Name
Ananlzed by: Senior Engineer Date: 05/03/2002
Composite Properties
Concrete Thickness 3.25 in Min Comp % 25%
Concrete Unit Weight 115 pcf Max comp % 90%
f'c 3.0 ksi Minimum Moment Strength, fMn #N/A k*ft
Deck Height 2.0 in Maximum Moment Strength, fMn #N/A k*ft
Effective Concrete Width, be #N/A in bar (from bottom of steel beam) #N/A in
Full Moment Strength, fMnf #N/A k*ft Actual Moment Strength, fMn #N/A k*ft
ressive Force in Concrete, C #N/A k PNA #N/A in
ffective Moment of Inertia, Ieff #N/A in4 Transform Moment of Inertia, Itr #N/A in4
stud length 4.0 in stud diameter 3/4 in
stud yield strength 60 ksi
Stud capacity Number of Studs
Qn (1 Stud per Rib) #N/A k # studs (1 Stud per Rib) #N/A
Qn (2 Studs per Rib) #N/A k # studs (2 Studs per Rib) #N/A
Total #N/A
cent of Full Composite Action #N/A
Shear
Maximum Factored Shear, Vu #N/A k
Shear Strength, fVn #N/A k
Moments
Condition Load Combo Mu (k*ft) Phi fMn (k*ft)
Pre Composite 1.2DL+1.6CLL #N/A 0.9 #N/A
Composite 1.4(DL+SDL) #N/A 0.85 #N/A
Composite 1.2(DL+SDL) #N/A 0.85 #N/A
+1.6LL
Reactions
DL Reaction #N/A kips
SDL Reaction #N/A kips
LL reaction #N/A kips
CLL reaction #N/A kips
Total Reaction #N/A kips
Vibration
Ec = 2136 ksi
n (vibration) = 10.06 Modular Ratio for Vibration = Es/(1.35*Ec)
y_bar = #N/A in From Bottom of Effective Concrete
Ij = #N/A in4
% sdl = 15%
% ll = 10%
wj = #N/A plf
Dj = #N/A in
fj = #N/A Hz
Ds = #N/A in4/ft Transformed slab moment of intertia per unit width
Dj = #N/A in4/ft
Cj = 2.0 Effective Width Coefficient
Bj = #N/A in
Contj = 1.5 Continuity Factor for Web Connected Beams
Wj = #N/A kips
Po = 65 lbs
Beta = 0.040
aj/g = #N/A
This spreadsheet has been prepared by AISC Marketing in accordance with recognized engineering
principles and information made available to AISC at the time of its preparation. While it is believed to be
accurate, it has not been prepared for conventional use as an engineering or construction document and
should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent professional examination
and verification of its accuracy, suitability and applicability by a licensed engineer, architect or other
professional. AISC disclaims any liability arising from the unauthorized use of the information contained in
this spreadsheet.
Parametric Bay Studies: LRFD Composite Girder
Design
Project Name: Sample
Scheme: Scheme 1
Project Location Anywhere USA
Company Company Name
Ananlzed by: Senior Engineer Date: 05/03/2002
Composite Properties
Concrete Thickness 3.25 in Min Comp % 25%
Concrete Unit Weight 115 pcf Max comp % 90%
f'c 3.0 ksi Minimum Moment Strength, f Mn #N/A k*ft
Deck Height 2.0 in Maximum Moment Strength, fMn #N/A k*ft
Effective Concrete Width, be #N/A in bar (from bottom of steel beam) #N/A in
Full Moment Strength, fMnf #N/A k*ft Actual Moment Strength, fMn #N/A k*ft
essive Force in Concrete, C #N/A k PNA #N/A in
fective Moment of Inertia, Ieff #N/A in4 Transform Moment of Inertia, Itr #N/A in4
stud length 4.0 in stud diameter 3/4 in
stud yield strength 60 ksi
Stud capacity Number of Studs
Qn (1 Stud per Row) #N/A k # studs (1 Stud per Row) #N/A
Qn (2 Studs per Row) #N/A k # studs (2 Studs per Row) #N/A
# studs in the constant moment region #N/A
cent of Full Composite Action #N/A Total #N/A
Moments at Centerline
Condition Load Combo Mu (k*ft) Phi fMn (k*ft)
Pre Composite 1.2DL+1.6CLL #N/A 0.9 #N/A
Composite 1.4(DL+SDL) #N/A 0.85 #N/A
Composite 1.2(DL+SDL)+1.6LL #N/A 0.85 #N/A
Reactions
DL Reaction #N/A kips
SDL Reaction #N/A kips
LL reaction #N/A kips
CLL reaction #N/A kips
Total Reaction #N/A kips
Vibration 3
Beam Selected for Vibration
Check of Girder
Ec = 2136 ksi
n (vibration) = 10.06 Modular Ratio for Vibration = Es/(1.35*Ec)
y_bar = #N/A in From Bottom of Effective Concrete
Ig = #N/A in4
% sdl = 15%
% ll = 10%
wg = #N/A plf
Dg = #N/A in
fg = #VALUE! Hz
Dj = #VALUE! in4/ft Beam Transformed moment of intertia per unit width
Dg = #N/A in4/ft
Cg = 1.8 Effective Width Coefficient
Bg = #VALUE! in
Contg = 1.0 Continuity Factor for Girders Connected to Columns
Wg = #VALUE! kips
Po = 65 lbs
Beta = 0.040
ag/g = #VALUE!
This spreadsheet has been prepared by AISC Marketing in accordance with recognized engineering principles
and information made available to AISC at the time of its preparation. While it is believed to be accurate, it has
not been prepared for conventional use as an engineering or construction document and should not be used or
relied upon for any specific application without competent professional examination and verification of its
accuracy, suitability and applicability by a licensed engineer, architect or other professional. AISC disclaims any
liability arising from the unauthorized use of the information contained in this spreadsheet.
Parametric Bay Studies: ASD Composite Beam
Design
Project Name: Sample
Scheme: Scheme 1
Project Location Anywhere USA
Company Company Name
Ananlzed by: Senior Engineer Date: 05/03/2002
Composite Properties
Concrete Thickness 3.25 in Min Comp % 25%
Concrete Unit Weight 115 pcf Max comp % 90%
f'c 3.0 ksi
Deck Height 2.0 in
Effective Concrete Width, be #N/A in bar (from bottom of steel beam) #N/A in
fective Section Modulus, Seff #N/A in3 Transform Section Modulus, Str #N/A k*ft
essive Force in Concrete, C #N/A k
fective Moment of Inertia, Ieff #N/A in4 Transform Moment of Inertia, Itr #N/A in4
stud length 4.0 in stud diameter 3/4 in
stud yield strength 60 ksi
Stud capacity Number of Studs
Qn (1 Stud per Rib) #N/A k # studs (1 Stud per Rib) #N/A
Qn (2 Studs per Rib) #N/A k # studs (2 Studs per Rib) #N/A
Total #N/A
cent of Full Composite Action #N/A
Shear
Maximum Shear, V #N/A k
Shear Stress #N/A ksi
Allowable Shear Stress 20 ksi
Moments
Condition Load Combo M (k*ft) fb Fb
Pre Composite DL+CLL #N/A #N/A 33
Mmax/Seff DL+SDL+LL #N/A #N/A 33
Mdl/Sx+Mpost/Seff(DL)+(SDL+LL) #N/A #N/A 45
Concrete Stress
Post Composite Concrete Stress #N/A ksi
Allowable Concrete Stress 1.35 ksi
Reactions
DL Reaction #N/A kips
SDL Reaction #N/A kips
LL reaction #N/A kips
CLL reaction #N/A kips
Total Reaction #N/A kips
Vibration
Ec = 2136 ksi
n (vibration) = 10.06 Modular Ratio for Vibration = Es/(1.35*Ec)
y_bar = #N/A in From Bottom of Effective Concrete
Ij = #N/A in4
% sdl = 15%
% ll = 10%
wj = #N/A plf
Dj = #N/A in
fj = #N/A Hz
Ds = #N/A in4/ft Transformed slab moment of intertia per unit width
Dj = #N/A in4/ft
Cj = 2.0 Effective Width Coefficient
Bj = #N/A in
Contj = 1.5 Continuity Factor for Web Connected Beams
Wj = #N/A kips
Po = 65 lbs
Beta = 0.040
aj/g = #N/A
This spreadsheet has been prepared by AISC Marketing in accordance with recognized engineering
principles and information made available to AISC at the time of its preparation. While it is believed to be
accurate, it has not been prepared for conventional use as an engineering or construction document and
should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent professional examination
and verification of its accuracy, suitability and applicability by a licensed engineer, architect or other
professional. AISC disclaims any liability arising from the unauthorized use of the information contained in
this spreadsheet.
Parametric Bay Studies: ASD Composite Girder
Design
Project Name: Sample
Scheme: Scheme 1
Project Location Anywhere USA
Company Company Name
Ananlzed by: Senior Engineer Date: 05/03/2002
Composite Properties
Concrete Thickness 3.25 in Min Comp % 25%
Concrete Unit Weight 115 pcf Max comp % 90%
f'c 3.0 ksi
Deck Height 2.0 in
Effective Concrete Width, be #N/A in Y bar (from bottom of steel beam) #N/A in
ffective Section Modulus, Seff #N/A in3 Transform Section Modulus, Str #N/A k*ft
essive Force in Concrete, C #N/A k
fective Moment of Inertia, Ieff #N/A in4 Transform Moment of Inertia, Itr #N/A in4
stud length 4.0 in stud diameter 3/4 in
stud yield strength 60 ksi
Stud capacity Number of Studs
Qn #N/A k # studs (1 Stud per Row) #N/A
# studs (2 Studs per Row) #N/A
# studs in the constant moment region #N/A
cent of Full Composite Action #N/A Total #N/A
Shear
Maximum Shear, V #N/A k
Shear Stress #N/A ksi
Allowable Shear Stress 20 ksi
Moments at Centerline
Condition Load Combo M (k*ft) fb Fb
Pre Composite DL+CLL #N/A #N/A 33.0
Mmax/Seff DL+SDL+LL #N/A #N/A 33.0
Mdl/Sx+Mpost/Seff(DL)+(SDL+LL) #N/A #N/A 45.0
Concrete Stress
Post Composite Concrete Stress #N/A ksi
Allowable Concrete Stress 1.35 ksi
Reactions
DL Reaction #N/A kips
SDL Reaction #N/A kips
LL reaction #N/A kips
CLL reaction #N/A kips
Total Reaction #N/A kips
Vibration 3
Beam Selected for Vibration
Check of Girder
Ec = 2136 ksi
n (vibration) = 10.06 Modular Ratio for Vibration = Es/(1.35*Ec)
y_bar = #N/A in From Bottom of Effective Concrete
Ig = #N/A in4
% sdl = 15%
% ll = 10%
wg = #N/A plf
Dg = 0.00 in
fg = #VALUE! Hz
Dj = #VALUE! in4/ft
Beam Transformed moment of intertia per unit width
Dg = #N/A in4/ft
Cg = 1.8 Effective Width Coefficient
Bg = #VALUE! in
Contg = 1.0 Continuity Factor Girders Connected to Columns
Wg = #VALUE! kips
Po = 65 lbs
Beta = 0.040
ag/g = #VALUE!
Max ao/g = 0.50%
This spreadsheet has been prepared by AISC Marketing in accordance with recognized engineering principles and
information made available to AISC at the time of its preparation. While it is believed to be accurate, it has not been
prepared for conventional use as an engineering or construction document and should not be used or relied upon
for any specific application without competent professional examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability
and applicability by a licensed engineer, architect or other professional. AISC disclaims any liability arising from the
unauthorized use of the information contained in this spreadsheet.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
WorkSheet "Girder"
Input from Code into Worksheet
Beam Analysis: ------------------------ Service Loads ------------------------------ --------- Factored Loads ---------
Load Case Left Right Max Max Max Max
(Kip & Kip-Ft) React. React. Shear Moments Shear Moments
1. Dead Load 8.2 8.2 8.2 51.5 9.9 61.7
2. DL+Const LL 10.3 10.3 10.3 64.5 14.4 82.6
3. Super DL 2.1 2.1 2.1 13.0 2.5 15.6
4. Live Load 4.1 4.1 4.1 25.6 6.6 41.0
5. Total Load 14.4 14.4 14.4 90.1 18.9 118.4
FINAL DESIGN
Beam Designation: Studs (Full Beam): Camber: Service Reactions (L,R):
W44X290 ( 28 ) < 0.00 in. > [ 14.4 k , 14.4 k ]
To Code Constants
To + From Code
From Code
Beam Analysis: ------------------------ Service Loads ------------------------------ --------- Factored Loads ---------
Load Case Left Right Max Max Max Max
(Kip & Kip-Ft) React. React. Shear Moments Shear Moments
1. Dead Load 19.0 19.0 19.0 177.8 22.8 213.3
2. Const LL 6.0 24.3 24.3 60.0 34.0 309.3
3. Super DL 3.0 3.0 3.0 30.0 3.6 36.0
4. Live Load 12.0 12.0 12.0 120.0 19.2 192.0
5. Total Load 34.0 34.0 34.0 327.8 45.6 441.3
FINAL DESIGN
Beam Designation: Studs (Full Beam): Camber: Service Reactions (L,R):
W44X335 ( 60 ) < 0.00 in. > [ 34.0 k , 34.0 k ]
To Code Constants
To + From Code
From Code
Beam Analysis: ------------------------ Service Loads ------------------------------ --------- Factored Loads ---------
Load Case Left Right Max Max Max Max
(Kip & Kip-Ft) React. React. Shear Moments Shear Moments
1. Dead Load 8.2 8.2 8.2 51.5 9.9 61.7
2. DL+Const LL 10.3 10.3 10.3 64.5 14.4 82.6
3. Super DL 2.1 2.1 2.1 13.0 2.5 15.6
4. Live Load 4.1 4.1 4.1 25.6 6.6 41.0
5. Total Load 14.4 14.4 14.4 90.1 18.9 118.4
FINAL DESIGN
Beam Designation: Studs (Full Beam): Camber: Service Reactions (L,R):
W44X290 ( 22 ) < 0.00 in. > [ 14.4 k , 14.4 k ]
To Code Constants
To + From Code
From Code
Beam Analysis: ------------------------ Service Loads ------------------------------ --------- Factored Loads ---------
Load Case Left Right Max Max Max Max
(Kip & Kip-Ft) React. React. Shear Moments Shear Moments
1. Dead Load 31.0 31.0 31.0 454.8 37.2 545.7
2. DL+Const LL 24.3 24.3 24.3 151.6 34.0 636.7
3. Super DL 4.5 4.5 4.5 67.5 5.4 81.0
4. Live Load 22.5 22.5 22.5 337.5 36.0 540.0
5. Total Load 58.0 58.0 58.0 859.8 78.6 1166.7
FINAL DESIGN
Beam Designation: Studs (Full Beam): Camber: Service Reactions (L,R):
W44X335 ( 48 ) < 0.00 in. > [ 58.0 k , 58.0 k ]