Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter - 1: 1.1 General
Chapter - 1: 1.1 General
Chapter - 1: 1.1 General
INTRODUCTION
1.1 GENERAL
Plastics are user friendly but not eco-friendly as they are non-
biodegradable. Today in INDIA nearly more than 12 million tons of
plastics are used. There visibility has been perceived as a serious problem
and made plastic a target in the management of solid waste. They also have
a very long lifetime and burning of plastics waste under uncontrolled
conditions could also lead to generation of many hazardous air pollutant
(HAPs) depending upon the type of polymers and additives used. Polymer
modified bitumen is emerging as one of the important construction of
flexible pavement. The polymer modified bitumen show better properties
for road construction and plastic waste can find its use in this process and
this can help solving problem of pollution. The better binding property of
plastic in its molten state has helped in finding out a method of safe
disposal of waste plastic. Roads surface with neat bitumen can cause
bleeding in hot climate, may develop cracks in cold climate possess fewer
loads bearing capacity and can cause serious damages because of higher
axial load in present conditions due to rapid infrastructure development.
India has to raise transportation system to a higher level both in terms of
length and quality .The use of waste in hot bituminous mixes too enhance
pavement performance, protect environment and provide low cost roads.
1
1.2 NECESSITY OF THE STUDY
2
1.4 ADVANTAGES OF PLASTIC ROAD
3
CHAPTER – 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
4
According to V.S. Punith, (2001), some encouraging results were
reported in this study that there is possibility to improve the performance of
bituminous mixes of road pavements. Waste plastics (polythene carry bags,
etc.) on heating soften at around 130°C. Thermo gravimetric analysis has
shown that there is no gas evolution in the temperature range of 130-
180°C. Softened plastics have a binding property. Hence, it can be used as
a binder for road construction.
5
Verma S.S. (2008). Concluded that Plastics will increase the melting
point of the bitumen. This technology not only strengthened the road
construction but also increased the road life.
Ms.Apurva Chavan (2013) says that using plastic waste in mix will
help reduction in need of bitumen by around 10%, increase the strength and
performance of road, avoid use of anti-stripping agent, avoid disposal of
plastic waste by incineration and land filling and ultimately develop a
technology, which is eco-friendly.
6
Gawande et al. (2012), Summarized an overview on waste plastic
utilization in asphalting of roads. They reviewed techniques to use plastic
waste for construction purpose of roads and flexible pavements.
7
CHAPTER – 3
MATERIALS USED
3.1 AGGREGATES
• Strength
• Hardness
• Toughness
• Durability
8
• Shape of aggregates
Strength
Hardness
Durability
Toughness
9
Shape of Aggregate
3.2 BITUMEN
Cutback Bitumen
Cut-back bitumen’s are those which are prepared with the addition of
a volatile to reduce the thickness of the binder.
10
Fluxed Bitumen
Modified Bitumen
Asphalt
VG-10 BITUMEN
11
VG-20 BITUMEN
• VG-20 is used for paving in cold climate & high altitude
regions.
VG-30 BITUMEN
• VG-30 is primarily used to construct extra heavy duty Bitumen
pavements that need to endure substantial traffic loads.
• It can be used in lieu of 60/70 Penetration grade.
VG-40 BITUMEN
• VG-40 is used in highly stressed areas such as intersections,
near toll booths and truck parking lots in lieu of old 30/40
Penetration grade.
• Due to its higher viscosity, stiffer Bitumen mixes can be
produced to improve resistance to shoving and other problems
associated with higher temperature and heavy traffic loads.
Bitumen Adheres
Bitumen is Elastic
Bitumen is Plastic
Bitumen Ages
Bitumen Hardens
12
BITUMEN ADHERES
BITUMEN IS ELASTIC
BITUMEN IS PLASTIC
13
BITUMEN AGES
BITUMEN HARDENS
Physical hardening
Exudative hardening
14
3.3 PLASTICS
Thermoplastics
Thermoplastics pellets soften when heated and become more fluid as
additional heat is applied.
This characteristic allows thermoplastics to be remolded and
recycled without negatively affecting the material’s physical
properties.
Thermoset
Thermoset plastics contain polymers that crosslink together during
the curing process to form an irreversible chemical bond.
Thermosets ideal for high heat applications such as electronics and
appliances.
3.3.2 E-PLASTICS
This study ensures that reusing of E-plastic as substitute in Road
construction gives technical as well as economic advantages and also the
problem of E-plastic disposal can be solved. In this project We are
replacing 2%, 4%, 6%, 8% of E-plastics modified bitumen instead of
15
normal Bitumen.. The E-plastic used was of discarded monitors,
keyboards, mouse and C.P.U. of computers.
– Highly recyclable
– Aesthetically superior
– finishes
– High impact
– resistance
– Remolding/reshaping capabilities
– Chemical resistant
– Hard crystalline or rubbery surface options
– Ecofriendly manufacturing
16
CHAPTER – 4
METHODOLOGY
SCOPE
LITERATURE
REVIEW
MATERIAL COLLECTION
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
TEST ON MATERIALS
Aggregates
Unmodified &
modified Bitumen
17
CHAPTER – 5
FIELD TEST & RESULTS
18
5.1.1 SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST
Gapp = [(MD/VN)]/W
Where,
Gbulk = [(MD/VB)]/W
19
Table 5.1.1 SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST
5. Result 2.8
Formula = W3 -W1/[(W2-W1)-(W4-W3)]
20
The difference between the apparent and bulk specific gravities is
nothing but the water permeable voids of the aggregates. We can measure
the volume of such voids by weighing the aggregates dry and in
a saturated surface dry condition, with all permeable voids filled with
water. The difference of the above two is MW.
Water absorption values ranges from 0.1 to about 2.0 percent for
aggregates normally used in road surfacing as per IS: 2386 (Part 3).
21
5.1.3 ABRASION TEST
22
5.1.4 IMPACT TEST
23
Table 5.1.4.2: PERMISSIBLE LIMIT OF IMPACT TEST AS PER
IS : 2386 (Part 4)
10-20% Strong
20-30% Satisfactory
24
Table 5.1.5 FLAKINESS INDEX
25
Table 5.1.6 ELONGATION INDEX
26
Table 5.1.7 CRUSHING TEST
The use of tested, sized, and graded aggregates will assure quality
materials for maintenance and construction of your roads. It is not the only
item one must consider, but in consideration with the other factors that
provide for a good road, well-prepared, sized, and graded aggregates must
be especially emphasized.
27
INDIVIDUAL GRADATION FOR 10mm
28
INDIVIDUAL GRADATION FOR 6mm
29
INDIVIDUAL GRADATION FOR DUST
30
5.2 TEST ON UNMODIFIED BITUMEN
31
5.2.1.2 PENETROMETER APPARATUS.
1. Initial reading 97 95 95
32
5.2.2 RING AND BALL APPARATUS.
1 46.4
2 46.9 46.5
33
5.2.3 DUCTILITY TEST.
1
44.5
2 44.5
44.5
3
44.5
34
5.3 E-PLASTIC MODIFIED BITUMEN
35
5.3.1 TEST ON E-PLASTIC MODIFIED BITUMEN
5.3.1.1PENETRATION TEST
2. Final reading 77 79 85
36
4% PLASTIC ADDED INTO BITUMEN
37
Fig 5.3.1.1 Variations in Penetration Values of Bitumen with Increase
in Percentage of Plastic.
1 50.4
2 50.5 50.45
38
4% PLASTIC ADDED INTO BITUMEN
1 50.7
2 50.9 50.8
1 51.8
2 52.1 51.95
39
Fig 5.3.1.2 Variations in Softening point Values of Bitumen with
Increase in Percentage of Plastics.
40
Table 5.3.1.2.4 REQUIREMENT FOR PAVING BITUMEN
SI Characteristics Paving Grades Method
No VG10 VG20 VG30 V40 of test ,
Ref to
1. Penetration at 80 60 45 35 IS 1203
25oC, 100g, 5 s,
0.1 mm, Min
2. Absolute 800-1200 1600-2400 2400-3600 3200-4800 IS 1206
viscosity at 60o (Part 2)
C, poises
3. Kinematic 250 300 350 400 IS 1206
viscosity at (Part 3)
135oC, cSt, Min
4. Flash point 220 220 220 220 IS 1448
(Cleveland open [P:69]
cup), o C, Min
5. Solubility in 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 IS 1216
trichloroethylen
e, percent, Min
6. Softening point 40 45 47 50 IS 1205
(R &B) ,o C,
Min
7. Tests on residue
from rolling
thin film oven
test: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 IS 1206
(a) Viscosity (Part 2 )
ratio at
60o C, 75 50 40 25 IS 1208
Max
(b) Ductility
at 25o C, cm,
Min
41
5.4 MIX DESIGN TEST
42
Table 5.4.1 COMBINED GRADATION FOR MIX PROPORTIONS
Passing % of average of Three Blended % Passing Specification
individual gradation Limits
Permissible
Sieve 10mm 6mm Dust 22%:35%:43% Specific
Limits
size mid
(JMF)
(mm) value
19 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100 +/-7 100
13.2 62.10 100.00 100.00 91.66 95 +/-6 90-100
9.5 9.60 100.00 100.00 80.11 79 +/-6 70-88
4.75 1.04 52.84 100.00 61.72 62 +/-5 53-71
2.36 0.00 15.59 98.00 47.60 50 +/-4 42-58
1.18 0.00 1.58 86.00 37.53 41 +/-4 34-48
0.600 0.00 1.08 73.00 31.77 32 +/-4 26-38
0.300 0.00 0.92 56.00 24.40 23 +/-3 18-28
0.150 0.00 0.75 37.00 16.17 16 +/-3 12-20
0.075 0.00 0.00 16.50 7.10 7 +/-1.5 4-10
10mm – 22%
6mm – 35%
Dust – 43%
TOTAL = 100%
43
5.4.2 MARSHAL STABILITY TEST
44
Fig 5.4.2.1.2 HEATING OF BITUMEN.
45
Fig 5.4.2.1.5 WATER WEIGHT OF SPECIMEN.
46
Fig 5.4.2.1.7 MARSHAL STABILITY TEST APPARATUS.
47
MARSHAL STABILITY TEST FOR UNMODIFIED BITUMEN
48
MARSHAL STABILITY TEST FOR 2% PLASTIC ADDED INTO
BITUMEN
49
MARSHAL STABILITY TEST FOR 4% PLASTIC ADDED INTO
BITUMEN
50
MARSHAL STABILITY TEST FOR 6% PLASTIC ADDED INTO
BITUMEN
51
Fig 5.4.2.1.8 Variations in Stability of Bitumen with Increase in
Percentage of Plastic.
52
5.5 COMPARISON OF MODIFIED AND UNMODIFIED
BITUMEN RESULTS
Table 5.5 COMPARISON OF MODIFIED AND UNMODIFIED
BITUMEN RESULTS
S:NO TEST ON UNMODIFIED E-PLASTIC
BITUMEN BITUMEN MODIFIED BITUMEN
2% 4% 6%
1 SOFTENING 46.5 50.4 50.8 51.95
TEST OC
2 PENETRATION 47 47.6 44.6 42.34
TEST mm
3 MARSHAL 1196.7 1216.45 1236.43 1303.1
STABILITY
TEST kg
From above all the results 6% plastic added into bitumen is suitable for
road construction
53
CHAPTER – 6
COST ANALYSIS
= Rs.27,000 per km
54
CHAPTER – 7
CONCLUSION
55
REFERENCE
56
9.Vasudevan R., Nigam S.K., Velkennedy R.,Ramalinga Chandra Sekar
A., Sundarakannan B.“Utilization of Waste Polymers for
FlexiblePavement and Easy Disposal of Waste Polymers”,International
Conference on Sustainable Solid WasteManagement, 5 - 7, Chennai,
India pp-105-111,2007.
57