Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gender & Society: The Sexism To Women in The Gaming Community
Gender & Society: The Sexism To Women in The Gaming Community
IN THIS ISSUE
CURRENT SITUATION
The most games where women have experienced sexism are Mobile Legends, COD
Mobile, Genshin Impact and Valorant. Sexism is still ongoing and alive in the gaming
community, but it does not affect women much because they do not mind for they are
immune already since sexism started a long time ago.
DEVELOPMENTAL CHALLENGES
Ever since discrimination became a trend, a lot of people are now calling out these men
and women who are sexist to women gamers. Though the community becomes broader, the
possibility of meeting sexist players are larger than before.
Mobile Legends creator must be more aware and active in doing penalties for its
community because it just happens that the most games with toxic people are from this.
People should start being more wholesome in games, that they should help each other and
not fight. Good players must be more kind because there are also newbies in the game and
telling them negative comments will not help any better. The gaming community must
prioritize banning people who send messages like this, because it is not good and it does not
help gamers to improve. This must be a worldwide talk so that the Gaming companies would
be more active in prioritizing the betterment and mental health of the players. We should
address this publicly because this issue is shadow banned. Women do not need any help
regarding this problem because they are already immune, but not all. These women became
stronger because they have experienced the worst, but that does not mean we should not
talk about it anymore. Gaming communities should do better because it is the women who
are adjusting for them.
JUNE 17, 2021 VOL. 1
Gender Equality
in College
Majors: Female
Participation in
STEM
by Marvie Pielago
CURRENT SITUATION
In the Philippines, just two in seven engineering students are female, only 41 percent of
students taking IT-related courses are women, and women make up only 43 percent of STEM
enrollments—and mostly in non-engineering or non-IT fields, according to statistics from the
Commission on Higher Education. Thus, there is a particularly strong need to understand
when and why young girls show less motivation for STEM, and to work to improve girls’ STEM
motivation. Recent evidence suggests that the most likely explanations involve gender
differences in preferences and choices rather than abilities and performance (Dasgupta &
Stout, 2014; Riegle-Crumb, King, Grodsky, & Muller, 2012). There are no reliable gender
differences in math ability and only small differences in spatial ability during kindergarten
through 12th grade (K-12) schooling indeed, high school girls may have strong skills across
multiple academic fields, thus preparing them for more career options than boys (Wang,
Eccles, & Kenny, 2013). Thus, the current debate has largely become one about the source of
gender differences in preferences and interests
JUNE 17, 2021 VOL. 1
DEVELOPMENTAL CHALLENGES
According to Smeding, A. (2012) In spite of the many barriers facing women's success in
counter-stereotypic, masculine disciplines such as STEM, some women are successful in
these fields. The present studies' aim was to examine whether STEM women would hold
weaker implicit gender-STEM stereotypes than non-STEM women. Assuming strong implicit
self-STEM associations were present among STEM women, it can be expected that even
when negative gender stereotypes are salient to some extent, STEM women can counteract
stereotypes’ biasing influence on performance by valuing the self in these fields. Her
research shows that French female engineering students hold weaker implicit gender-STEM
stereotypes than other groups of students, it does not allow drawing definite conclusions
about why these stereotypes were weaker to begin with or about the causal link between
implicit gender-STEM stereotyping and STEM achievement. The findings provide definitive
evidence of a need to encourage and support women in STEM with a goal of gender parity.
Given the high-quality, well-paying jobs in the fields of science, technology, engineering
and math, there is great opportunity for growth in STEM in support of Philippines
competitiveness, innovation and jobs of the future.
Understanding how stereotypes affect motivation may help alleviate a key issue within
contemporary STEM education—the underrepresentation of women in certain STEM fields.
The underrepresentation of women in STEM is problematic both because women
disproportionately fail to benefit from lucrative, high-status careers in fields like computer
science, and because this reduces diversity that could increase technological and scientific
innovations (C. Hill, Corbett, & St. Rose, 2010). The findings provide definitive evidence of a
need to encourage and support women in STEM with a goal of gender parity. Given the
high-quality, well-paying jobs in the fields of science, technology, engineering and math,
there is great opportunity for growth in STEM in support of Philippines competitiveness,
innovation and jobs of the future.
Albeit the gap difference of the competencies from both genders can be relatively small,
it shows much greater difference between motivation-related activities throughout the
school year. Thus why, these occurrence channels students to take a gendered pathway via
gendered educational and occupational preferences. (Kessels, Heyder, Latsch, & Hannover,
2014)
Gender has been the traditional basis of how the society gives certain roles to male and
female. This has been prevalent, and gender has been associated with many things that
describes as either masculine or feminine. (Kauffman, 1997 as stated in Igbo, Onu, Obiyo,
2015) Thus gender had been related to how individuals perceive themselves, in which people
identify themselves with certain attributes. The environment that the child had grown in
can have a lot of impact on the child, and these certain attributes affects the child as they
grow and develop. According to Berk (2010), girls and boys are treated differently at birth.
Girls are often associated with pink, dresses, they are offered more sex-stereotyped toys,
and girls are handled and treated gently. Whereas boys, are often associated with blue, and
parents tend treat them roughly because, as in line with Kauchak and Eggen (2011) who
stated that, boys are perceived as masculine, handsome, and tough. It has been then argued
by the American Association of University Women (AAUW, 2006 as stated in Igbo, Onu,
Obiyo, 2015) that the different treatment given by the parents, teachers and, the society
between both genders had dangerously hindered the educational progress, self-esteem and
career choices of females. Thus why, the cause of differences in competencies in academic
achievement of male and female may be from gender stereotyping. Which, Aboud (1988) and
Durkin (1995) has stated that the stereotypic views may have had reflected the cognitive
developmental changes and the perception of categories, attributes, and changes in role-
taking skills. Therefore, gender stereotyping testify individuals’ orientation, which can
either manifest positively or negatively the moment they interact outside their immediate
environment. (Igbo, Onu, Obiyo, 2015
CURRENT SITUATION
Although we all know that home is where the heart is, unfortunately,
it’s also the first place where children are socialized and introduced to
gender norms, values, and, stereotypes. The moment babies are born,
their assigned biological sex (male or female) immediately shapes to how
they should behave, and how they should be treated according to the
dominant gender stereotypes in the society.(Wang, Eccles, & Kenny,
2013). Thus, the current debate has largely become one about the source
of gender differences in preferences and interests. Studies have shown
that a person’s sense of being either male or females has been primarily
determined with how they are treated by others. Moreover, base from
external environment, children learn that boys and girls are different,
thus having different preferences in many things. These differences, and
assigned roles based on sex, or as it’s called, “gender binary” has been
the basis of what boys, girls, men and women can and cannot do. As an
example, females are most likely, and expected to be fragile and
submissive, whilst men are dominant and strong.
JUNE 17, 2021 VOL. 1
The impact of this gender norm is that it is restrictive, and hurts everyone – a lot of
people has been suffocated and conformed to act along the expected roles assigned to their
gender which limits and restricts their freedom, and will to behave and participate, for the
sole reason that it may not be an acceptable gender norm for their assigned sex. Gendered
norms also results in women experiencing violence, harassment, and struggle in accepting
equal pay opportunities and men experience higher rates of substance abuse and completed
suicide. (Plan International Canada, n.d)
Research had suggested that gender gap still persists throughout the years, despite the
progress of women made in the school and the workplace throughout the decade. The root
of this gap may have been because of gender bias. Gender bias and discrimination still
persists in many schools, and sometimes even under school staff’s surveillance. Though,
these important topics mostly isn’t mostly discussed, adults, can take a step to shed light to
address the recurring issue. For many youth, this will be a challenging discussion, and might
even be a little controversial and personal which can bring up questions of equality and
privilege, and for some others, they even question if gender bias truly exists. (Harvard
Graduate School of Education, 2018)
DEVELOPMENTAL CHALLENGES
Gender difference has been the focus on various areas in intellectual achievement.
(Halpern, 2012 as stated in Voyer, D. & Voyer, S.D, 2014). What we know about gender
differences in intellectual achievement comes from various meta-analyses that have been
summarized findings obtained in relevant research. Hyde, Fennema and Lamon (1190; see
also Est-Quest, Hyde, & Linn, 2010 as stated in Voyer, D. & Voyer, S.D, 2014) reported that
Mathematics achievement were in favour of men, although the gap’s closing, as stated in
recent data in the field. (Hyde, Lindberg, Linn, Ellis, & Williams, 2008; Lindberg et al., 2010
as stated in Voyer, D. & Voyer, S.D, 2014). There are also male advantages in scientific
achievement tests. (Hedges & Nowell, 1995 as stated in Voyer, D. & Voyer, S.D, 2014) whereas
there is a female advantage in reading comprehension. (e.g., Hedges & Nowell, 1995; Lynn &
Mikk, 2009; Nowell & Hedges, 1998 as stated in Voyer, D. & Voyer, S.D, 2014).
It is suggested that children be educated about the role of gender in society and its
importance to be aware. Moreover, it is not only for the children or the students but also
aspiring parents, parents, and teachers in general to be educated about the possible actions
of instilling gender stereotyping towards their children at home and in the classroom.
There has been an increasing focus around of the study. That later resulted in
women's empowerment that has been recognized serious consequences for women and
worldwide and gender policies are created to men, as well as the relationship
DEVELOPMENTAL CHALLENGES
About the developed gender mainstreamed policies, much of the literature is discussing
the importance of gender equality and how it is necessary to promote women’s
empowerment in societies and households, and involve men in the processes for the reason
that men are also recognized as agents of change to eradicate gender inequalities
(Millennium Projects, 2006)
The perspective of men as potential agents of change and not merely objects of blame
have been an increased interest across a range of development issues and institutions (Greig,
Kimmel & Lang, 2000). However, while many scholars have studied women’s empowerment
concerning gender equality, there have also been some works of literature discussing the
impacts of development and gender policies on men, which are nevertheless about women’s
increasing power (Greig, Kimmel & Lang, 2000). In line with this, several development
scholar-practitioners have researched the challenges and success of gender mainstreaming
strategy and its implementation.
Based on the twenty respondents, they are in favor of improving and reviewing the current
gender mainstreaming policies that the Philippines has. The respondents are from different parts
of Cavite ages 15-45 years old, majority of them wish to improve the quality of gender
mainstreaming policies in the Philippines. According to the gathered data, men can also
experience gender discrimination and violence in their every day lives but the study reveals that
when men are being discriminated there’s only a little chance that someone will stand up for
them. The study also shows that most of the reports are from women who experience sexism.
The impacts on the relationship between men and women after the implementation of the
extensive gender mainstreaming policies that numerous international and regional organizations
have adopted is evident that such impacts through gender policies and the promotion of gender
equality have numerous effects on both men and women, as well as the relationship between
them. The research suggests reviewing and revising the existing gender mainstreaming policies
in the current constitution in order to deliver better and fair service to all genders.
Purchasing Behavior of
the Male and Female
College Students of De La
Salle University-
Dasmariñas Towards
Online Shopping
by Kyla Sumagaysay
PHOTO FROM CANVA
JUNE 17, 2021 VOL. 1
CURRENT SITUATION
DEVELOPMENTAL CHALLENGES
Differences between male and female purchasing behavior and tendencies exist, but it
is not that huge, and significant to oppose both sexes in online marketing campaigns.
Therefore, the researcher of this study would like to suggest that online marketers should
create a gender well-balanced online marketing campaign that will be as interesting as the
one based on common stereotypes.
Gender-Based
Housework Role
Division's
by Jamaica Enderio
The traditional family structure devoted sufficient time to the children as the mother
was involved in the whole childcare and growth process, while the father was required to
provide the necessary food supplies. They take on additional responsibilities as family
members mature, including being a spouse, parent, or grandparent. Depending on the age
and family level, the role of a person is often expanding or changing. (Epstein, N. B. Bishop,
D., Ryan, C., Miller, & Keitner, G. (1993)
Several studies talk about the ongoing dominance of women in household responsibility
since the allocation of homework seems more traditional than egalitarian, and even in
egalitarian societies these gender-based household role can still be observed. (Sanchez &
Thompson, 1997; Diefenbach, 2002). Simone de Beauvoir wrote in The Second Sex published in
1949, that "Few tasks are more like the torment of Sisyphus than homework, with its infinite
repetition." Of course, de Beauvoir was not object to the job alone, but the division of labor;
the housework is also distressing, since it is highly probable that you end up doing more of it,
regardless of who ears more or who spends time in the workplace, when you are a woman
living with a man. Men do much more housework to be fair to us than they did in 1949. But
more than that, women still do. But now both sexes have cause to feel resentful for how long
they waste with toilet Duck in their hands or scooping pieces of spaghetti out of the sink. The
studies claim that this possibly explains the tendency for men to do less household chores and
women to become more bread-earners: they begin behaving in a hyper conventional manner to
compensate both genders, subconsciously distracted by their breach of traditional Gender
standards. This helps to understand why women typically take on the additional responsibility
of the "worried job" – the duty of keeping track of what has to be accomplished in the first
place.
CURRENT SITUATION
According to some studies, gender-based housework role division is still observable and
exacerbated in some other places, particularly in rural areas. Several studies confirm, gender
ideology appears to influence the percentage of tasks considered traditionally feminine by
members of the couple, such as washing, ironing, child care, cooking, or cleaning.
JUNE 17, 2021 VOL. 1
DEVELOPMENTAL CHALLENGES
Gender roles: A sociological perspective. Routledge.), And these modern lifestyles require
both parents to work and gain the balance to meet life's demands. Also, modernity has greatly
altered the nature of the family and gender roles have distracted themselves from the
conventional roles and route of exercise. In fact, the divide between the various sexes has
already narrowed, producing a completely equal society and more equal families. Nowadays,
less monarchs are found in families and fewer representatives in families who are fighting for
obedience.
JUNE 17, 2021 VOL. 1
It is crucial to reassess fairness and equity for everyone in the house, regardless of
gender. Furthermore, it would be ideal if future studies considered actions to reduce
imbalances and inequalities, as well as measures to promote gender equality. It would also be
beneficial if society held seminars or forums that included fair and equitable household role
division regardless of sexual orientation. Moreover, household members should be
empowered to take a Gender Equality and Egalitarian approach to household task
assignment.
CURRENT SITUATION
DEVELOPMENTAL CHALLENGES
The fashion industry thrives in elitism. Changes that might rock what is commonly practiced
might not be accepted. But there are brands that prioritized inclusivity and ethical demands.
Those include comfortable, affordable clothes for women. With the changing political and
social outlooks, brands that try to be inclusive to all women create a market without
compromising women and their clothing.
JUNE 17, 2021 VOL. 1
REFERENCES
Akman, I., & Mishra, A. (2010). Gender, age and income differences in internet usage among employees in
organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 482-490.
Ali, P. & Sankaran, S. (2010). Online Shopping Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty in Norway
Alreck, P., & Settle, R. B. (2002). Gender effects on Internet, catalogue and store shopping. The Journal of
Database Marketing, 9(2), 150-162.
Awasthi B. (2017). From Attire to Assault: Clothing, Objectification, and De-humanization - A Possible
Prelude to Sexual Violence?. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00338
Basow, S. A. (1992). Gender: Stereotypes and roles. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
Baxter, J. (2000). The joys and justice of housework. Sociology, 34(4), 609-631.
Coltrane, S. (2010). Gender theory and household labor. Sex Roles, 63(11), 791-800.
Deihm, J., & Thomas, A. (2018). Women’s Pockets are Inferior. Retrieved May 27, 2021, from
https://pudding.cool/2018/08/pockets/
Easpaig, B. (n.d.). AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF SEXISM IN ONLINE GAMING COMMUNITIES: MAPPING
CONTESTED DIGITAL TERRAIN. In Community Psychology in Global Perspective (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 119-
135). CPGP, Comm. Psych. Glob. Persp.
Fang, X., & Yen, D. C. (2006). Demographics and behavior of Internet users in China. Technology in
Society, 28(3), 363-387.
Goodnow, J. J., & Bowes, J. M. (1994). Men, women, and household work. Oxford University Press.
Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1986). Individuation in family relationships. Human development, 29(2),
82-100.
H. Dittmar, K. Long, and R. Meek, “Buying on The Internet: Gender Difference in On-line and
Conventional Buying Motivation,” Sex Roles, pp. 423, 2004.
Haque, A., Sadeghzadeh, J., & Khatibi, A. (2011). Identifying potentiality online sales in Malaysia: a study
on customer relationships online shopping. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 22(4).
Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2003). Uses of the Internet and their relationships with individual differences in
personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1), 59-70.
Jackson, L. A., Zhao, Y., Qiu, W., Kolenic III, A., Fitzgerald, H. E., Harold, R., & von Eye, A. (2008). Culture,
gender and information technology use: A comparison of Chinese and US children. Computers in Human
Behavior, 24(6), 2817-2829.
Jain, D., Goswami, S., Bhutani, S., “Consumer Behavior towards Online Shopping: An Empirical Study from
Delhi”, Volume 16, Issue 9.Ver. IV (Sep. 2014), PP 65-72
Khare, A., & Rakesh, S. (2011). Antecedents of online shopping behavior in India: An examination. Journal
of Internet Commerce, 10(4), 227-244.
Korgaonkar, P. K., & Wolin, L. D. (1999). A multivariate analysis of web usage. Journal of advertising
research, 39, 53-68.
Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific
Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255-256. PHOTO FROM CANVA
Levy, K. (2002). Overcoming the digital divide. Panel discussion: E-government and citizen centered
government round table.
Lin, P.-H. (2013). Shopping Motivations on The Internet: An Empirical Study of Trust, Satisfaction, and
Loyalty. International Journal of Electronic Business Management., 11(4), 238–246.
Lindsey, L. L. (2015). Gender roles: A sociological perspective. Routledge.
Marks, J. L., Lam, C. B., & McHale, S. M. (2009). Family patterns of gender role attitudes. Sex roles, 61(3-
4), 221-234.
JUNE 17, 2021 VOL. 1
REFERENCES
Masoud, E. (2013), “The Effect of Perceived Risk on Online Shopping in Jordan”, European Journal of
Business and Management. 5 (6) ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online).
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis.
Philippines - Country Commercial Guide. (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.trade.gov/knowledge-
product/philippines-ecommerce
Potosky, D. (2007). The Internet knowledge (iKnow) measure. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2760-
2777.
Rao, A. H. (2019). Even breadwinning wives don’t get equality at home. The Atlantic.
Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., & Moore, C. (2016). Do they stay or do they go? The switching decisions of
individuals who enter gender atypical college majors. Sex roles, 74(9-10), 436-449.
Rodgers, S., & Harris, M. A. (2003). Gender and e-commerce: an exploratory study. Journal of
Adverstising Research, 43(3), 322-329.
S. Rodgers and M. Harris, “Gender and E-Commerce: An exploratory study,” Journal of Advertising
Research, pp. 322–329, 2003.
Schrader, G., University, E., Chowdhury, E., Franz, M., Brennan, A., Farrell, R., . . . Lee, M. (2019, October
15). Sexism in the gaming community. Retrieved March 22, 2021, from
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/sexism-gaming-community
Schulten, K. (2014, October 17). How sexist is the gaming world? Retrieved March 22, 2021, from
https://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/17/how-sexist-is-the-gaming-world/
Shaw, S. M. (1988). Gender differences in the definition and perception of household labor. Family
relations, 333-337.
Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual review of sociology, 22(1), 299-
322.
Stafford, T. F., Turan, A., & Raisinghani, M. S. (2004). International and Cross-Cultural Influences on
Online Shopping Behavior. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 7(2).
Thébaud, S., Kornrich, S., & Ruppanner, L. (2019). Good housekeeping, great expectations: Gender and
housework norms. Sociological Methods & Research, 0049124119852395.
U. Gneezy and R. Croson, “Gender Differences in Preferences,” Journal of Economic Literature, pp. 448–
474, 2004.
University of Sunderland. (2017, October 4). Is gendered clothing part of our evolution? Retrieved May 27,
2021, from https://www.sunderland.ac.uk/more/news/story/Is-gendered-clothing-part-of-our-
evolution-272
Wang, M. T., Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender
differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological
science, 24(5), 770-775.
Zhang, Y. (2005). Age, gender, and Internet attitudes among employees in the business world. Computers
in Human Behavior, 21(1), 1-10.