4/14/2021 THE MENACE OF AERIAL HIJACKING AND THE INTERNATIONAL AIR LAWS

Indian Review of Advanced Legal Research

Home Events Blog Editorial Board Advisory Board Submission Guidelines Work With Us About Us

IRALR Dec 28, 2020 5 min read

THE MENACE OF AERIAL HI ACKING

AND THE INTERNATIONAL AIR LAWS

Source : Legal India

This article has been authored by Aanya Anvesha and Aryan Sharma, second year students
at Institute of Law, Nirma University.

Introduction to Aerial Hijacking

One of the most troubling byproducts of the aviation age has been the unlawful seizure

of, or interference with the control of an aircraft. Incidents of Aerial Hijacking took place

not long after international air travel got commonplacebecause of the increased use of

aircraft, now an indispensable means for travel, giving rise to many problems. Aircraft

hijacking attacks all nations indiscriminately, as such incidents impact foreign relations

between states and the framework of international communication and diplomacy. In

addition to putting human lives and property at risk, aircraft hijacking sabotages the ight

safety of other airlines that use the airspace, a ect the trust of people towards air travel,

thereby creating nancial problems for the aviation economy.

https://www.iralr.in/post/the-menance-of-aerial-hijacking-and-the-international-air-laws 1/5
4/14/2021 THE MENACE OF AERIAL HIJACKING AND THE INTERNATIONAL AIR LAWS

The major motivations behind the unlawful seizure of an aircraft may be:

1) Personal motive: A motive is said to be personal if it is derived from being mentally

sick, being poor, being homesick, or taking somebody else’s belongings in one’s

possession.

2) Political motive: This motive allows hijacking to achieve political objectives by taking

hostage a particular passenger or o cer on-board.

3) Refugee motive: The hijacker with this motive commits the crime because he wants to

take shelter in another country as he is unhappy with the state of government in his

home country.

Shortcomings of Various Legislations

The responsibility of a nation to resolve an event of aircraft hijacking has been stated

clearly in many international conventions and also in respective national legislations.

These conventions were brought in place to address the objective of punishing o ences

in the aviation sector. Some of these conventions are the Geneva Convention of 1958, the

Tokyo Convention of 1963, The Hague Convention of 1970 and the Montreal Convention

of 1971 .

A. Geneva Convention

Geneva Convention Regarding Open Seas, 1958 does not provide much information

about aircraft hijacking. Moreover,it uses the term "aircraft piracy" to refer to the practice

of hijacking. This erroneously suggests that the act of aircraft hijacking is piratical and

therefore, an established o ense under general international law. Article 15 of the Geneva

Convention gives a traditional meaning of the term piracy and it can be understood from

the said article that piracy is committed for a personal end, directed against another ship

or aircraft, and executed on the high seas or in a place outside the jurisdiction of any

state. All these elements do not apply to the present-day practice of hijacking. Thus,

under this article, if an act of hijacking is committed with any other motive other than

personal goal would not be punishable. Moreover, hijacking has to be occurred within the

air space of a state and not necessarily in the air space of another state.

B. Tokyo Convention

https://www.iralr.in/post/the-menance-of-aerial-hijacking-and-the-international-air-laws 2/5
4/14/2021 THE MENACE OF AERIAL HIJACKING AND THE INTERNATIONAL AIR LAWS

Signed in 1963, Tokyo Convention contains Article 11 which de nes aircraft hijacking as an

“act of interference, seizure, or other wrongful exercises of control of an aircraft", and

imposes an obligation on the contracting states to take all appropriate measures to

restore the lawful control of an aircraft. Paragraph 2 of the same article says that if a

hijacked plane lands in a contracting state, it would be the responsibility of such state to

allow the a ected passengers and crew to continue their journey as soon as “practicable”

and to return the cargo to its lawful owner.

It is pertinent to note that although these provisions are aimed at the resumption of

hijacked ight in addition to protecting passengers, crew-members, and property, they

fall short of providing a solution for the prevention of Hijacking. It is left to the discretion

of the contracting state to prosecute the o ender or extradite him at another state’s

request, but this convention makes none of these actions an obligation on the

contracting state. There is also no prescription of adequate punitive measures and thus is

of little signi cance in this regard.

C. The Hague Convention

The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), after recognizing that the Tokyo

Convention was not much of a help in the issue of creating deterrence, took steps to ll

the gaps and the end product was the Hague Hijacking Convention.

Article I of The Hague Convention de nes what constitutes an o ense and limits the

scope of the treaty to cases when

i. the aircraft is hijacked while in ight,

ii. the hijacker is on board the hijacked aircraft, and

iii. the hijacker uses force or threat of force to seize control of the aircraft.

Hence, this would exclude cases involving armed attacks directed against air facilities or

aircraft not in- ight like the attack on an El Al Jetliner, 1968. Article 3 further limits the

Convention to not include a case involving military, police, and customs aircrafts services.

The Convention still fails to recognize the act of aerial hijacking as an international crime

and o ers no relief or rewarding of damages to the victims of the hijacking.

Concluding Remarks

https://www.iralr.in/post/the-menance-of-aerial-hijacking-and-the-international-air-laws 3/5
4/14/2021 THE MENACE OF AERIAL HIJACKING AND THE INTERNATIONAL AIR LAWS

In the 1960s and 1970s, politically motivated aircraft seizures became commonplace. This

led to enhancements in security measures and protocols and this is the reason why

incidents of airline hijacking today are much rarer. However, there is no assurance that

such hijacking incidents or threats of hijacking incidents would never arise in the future.

Terrorists or politically motivated individuals could always develop new technologies to

enable aircraft hijacking. The above-mentioned laws that are in place today are of little

relevance as they are inadequate to deal with all the modern problems of aerial hijacking

and also fall short to create a deterring e ect for future events. The loopholes in security

legislations of countries and the punishments prescribed not being deterrent a ects

many people and regions.

The most regretful shortcoming of the above-mentioned laws is that the States have a

prerogative right to grant the o ending hijackers political asylum in its territory if it

sympathizes with their motive. According to Article 14 of the International Covenant on

Human Rights in 1966, every natural person has the right to ask for asylum. Hijackers will

be immune from any extradition or prosecution if they are granted such asylum.

Therefore, the o ense of hijacking needs to be established as a non-political o ense to

eliminate barriers in the extradition of fugitives.

Enforcement of such conventions is also di cult on states that are not a party to these

conventions as international law does not provide a way to force an obligation on a non-

contracting state. This elementary rule of international law is reinstated in Article 34 of

the 1969 Vienna convention on the law of treaties. The use of an aviation boycott as a

sanction is also delicate as it might ruin foreign relations. Hence, the international

community has to cooperate in coming up with uniform legislation that covers up the

shortcomings of the existing treaties to prevent the menace of aerial hijacking. To

eradicate the crime of Aerial Hijacking from its root, the existing loopholes in international

and national laws should be xed and changed keeping in mind the global needs.

International Law
Recent Posts See All

Should India sign the Hague NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT INTERNATIONAL LAW

Convention on e Civil Aspect… SANS DETERMINATIONS CONCERNING THE…

https://www.iralr.in/post/the-menance-of-aerial-hijacking-and-the-international-air-laws 4/5
4/14/2021 THE MENACE OF AERIAL HIJACKING AND THE INTERNATIONAL AIR LAWS

0 0 0

Comments

Write a comment...

Subscribe

Email Address

Submit

editorial@iralr.in

ga('require', 'ipMeta', { serviceProvider: 'dimension1', networkDomain: 'dimension2', networkType: 'dimension3', });

ga('ipMeta:loadNetworkFields'); ga('send', 'pageview');
©2020 by Indian Review of Advanced Legal Research. 

https://www.iralr.in/post/the-menance-of-aerial-hijacking-and-the-international-air-laws 5/5