The document describes four learning style types:
1) Accommodators are enthusiastic, risk-taking, and learn best through hands-on experience and projects.
2) Divergers are imaginative, reflective observers who generate ideas and learn by listening and sharing perspectives.
3) Assimilators are logical and independent thinkers who learn by analyzing ideas and designing organized models.
4) Convergers are practical problem solvers who learn by testing ideas and coming to conclusions.
The document describes four learning style types:
1) Accommodators are enthusiastic, risk-taking, and learn best through hands-on experience and projects.
2) Divergers are imaginative, reflective observers who generate ideas and learn by listening and sharing perspectives.
3) Assimilators are logical and independent thinkers who learn by analyzing ideas and designing organized models.
4) Convergers are practical problem solvers who learn by testing ideas and coming to conclusions.
The document describes four learning style types:
1) Accommodators are enthusiastic, risk-taking, and learn best through hands-on experience and projects.
2) Divergers are imaginative, reflective observers who generate ideas and learn by listening and sharing perspectives.
3) Assimilators are logical and independent thinkers who learn by analyzing ideas and designing organized models.
4) Convergers are practical problem solvers who learn by testing ideas and coming to conclusions.
Strong in getting things done, in carrying out plans and experiments
Gets involved with lots of new activities – good starter Operates on trial and error: “gut reaction” Gets others’ opinions, feelings, information and depends on others rather than on his own analytical ability Involves and inspires other people Searches, seeks out new experiences Likes risks, excitement, change and incentives Dislikes routine Excels in adapting to situations Willing to try, jump in Spontaneous and impatient; can be impulsive Looks to the future Likes learning with people through projects, discussion, “doing” Broad practical interest
DIVERGER “Imaginative”
Able to view concrete situations from many perspectives
Sees lots of alternatives – the whole picture “Gestalt” Strong imagination Excels in idea-generation, “brainstorming” Creates with emotions, aesthetic interest Oriented to relationships with people, supportive Uses eyes, ears, listens, observes, asks questions Observes others, can model behavior Good at seeing, imagining self in different situations Unhurried, casual, calm, friendly, avoids conflict Imaginative and reflective Timing is important, can’t be pushed until ready Likes assurances from others Learns by listening, then sharing ideas with small number of people or by modeling Broad cultural interests and tend to specialize in the arts Characteristics of persons with humanities and liberal arts background ASSIMILATOR “Logical”
A good theory builder, planner
Puts ideas together to form a new model Excels in integrating data for explanations Good synthesizer Precise, thorough, careful Organized, follows a plan Redesigns, re-tests, digests Calculates the probabilities Reacts slowly and wants facts Works independently, thinking, reading Avoids over involvement Reflective and patient Pushes mind, analyzes ideas, critiques Rational, logical, complete Learns by individually thinking through ideas and designing a plan or model in an organized way Less interested in people and more concerned with theories being logically sound and precise Characteristics of the basic sciences and mathematics
CONVERGER “Practical”
Applies ideas to solving problems
Makes theories useful Has detective skills; search and solve Tests hypotheses objectively Unemotional, prefers to deal with things rather than people Uses reason, logic to meet goals; takes action Speculates on alternatives Likes to be in control of the situation Sets up projects, pilots with research Acts independently then gets feedback Uses factual data, book, theories Practical and action oriented Responsible, takes action on tasks Learns by working at probabilities and testing them out; coming to conclusions Narrow technical interests Characteristics of many engineers EXAMINING LEARNING STYLES Possible Plus Possible Minus Enthusiastic Gets others involved Does not organize or set goals Operates on intuition “gut Is too impulsive reactions” Becomes splintered because of Takes risks with new experiences over involvement Motivates easily Doesn’t always take care of loose Talks to other people to gain ends inspiration Becomes unbelievable to other Tries several options people Changes job too quickly Imaginative Generates lots of options for Is afraid to change relationships change Hates conflict or hurting people, Observes how others have made so stays the same changes Has good ideas that don’t result in Uses creative hunches any real changes Plays with ideas Desires security of status quo Fantasizes, can see images Refused to be pushed Lets ideas integrate or come Waits too long for inspiration together before making changes Waits for the best things Logical Gathers relevant facts, puts in Needs much evidence before logical order willing to act Is very organized Is too cautious, slow, methodical Feels more secure in change Doesn’t get involved with people Reads books, looks at several Becomes easily bogged down in approaches, double checks theory Uses resources well Wants too many guarantees Analyses options, calculates Takes risks very slowly probabilities Maps out on paper before jumping in Works well alone Practical Sees change as problem to be Emphasizes tasks over people solved Finds it difficult to wait for anything Uses detective skills to get facts Is impatient Evaluates options, set up trial Has need to control and do things situations alone Sets goals and acts, does not Doesn’t listen enough to others become bogged down Works well independently