Department of Education: Gawad Inomara Top Awards 2021

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
REGION IV-A CALABARZON
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF LIPA CITY
INOSLOBAN-MARAWOY INTEGRATED NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
GAWAD INOMARA TOP AWARDS 2021

INOSLOBAN- MARAWOY INTEGRATED NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL TOP AWARDS 2021
(TOP- TEACHING AND NON-TEACHING OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE AWARDS 2021)
I. Rationale and Purpose

Recognition is a very rewarding experience for an excellent classroom teacher and
school staff. Recognition for teachers and school staff play vital role in school’s mission and vison. It offers
hope for meaningful fulfillment of duty to the other teachers and staff working to improve school
outcomes. It also brings pride and support for the teacher, staff, administration, and general public.
In conformity with DepEd Order No. 9, s. 2002 entitled Program on Awards and
Incentives for Service Excellence (PRAISE) of the Department of Education and the Search for Outstanding
Public Officials and Employees that have been conducted by the Civil Service Commission (CSC) annually
(CSC Memorandum Circular No. 3, s. 2016) DepEd Order No. 9, s. 2002, Inosloban- Marawoy Integrated
National High School shall conduct the GAWAD INOMARA TOP AWARDS 2021-Inosloban- Marawoy
Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

Email Address: inoslobanmarawoynationalhs@gmail.com
MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
Integrated National High School Top Awards 2021 (Top- Teaching And Non-Teaching Outstanding Performance
Awards 2021)
This aims to recognize the teachers and staff who had an outstanding performance and give
appreciation to the teachers and staff who rendered exemplary Service.
GAWAD INOMARA TOP AWARDS 2021 is designed to give appreciation and recognize
teachers and staff who delivered outstanding performance. It is designed for the teachers to be more
motivated and provide inspiration in doing duties specially in this time of pandemic.
II. Awards Mechanics and Criteria
There shall be twelve (13) awards to be given to the outstanding teaching and non-teaching personnel and
Additional special Awards yet to be disclosed.
Most Outstanding Researcher (1)
Most Outstanding Reading Coordinator (1)
Most Outstanding Coordinator (1)
Most Outstanding Module Evaluator (1)
Most Outstanding Learning Module Writer (1)
Most Outstanding FB Live Demonstration Teacher (1)
Most Outstanding Class Adviser (1)
Most Outstanding Interactive Online Class Teacher (1)
Most Outstanding Interactive Modular Class Teacher (1)
Most Outstanding Innovative Project (1)
Most Outstanding Non-Teaching Personnel (1)
Most Outstanding Grade Level (1)
Outstanding Service Award (20)
Additional special Awards
1. The awardees shall receive a plaque/trophy while the finalists shall receive a certificate.

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
2. The Selection Committee shall evaluate and choose the awardee based on the given criteria in each
award.
3. The Awarding Ceremony shall be held on July 28, 2021, via an online meet.
General Qualifications
 Employed personnel of Inosloban- Marawoy Integrated National High School for at
least one (1) year.
 Has a permanent item as a DepEd employee?
III. Search and Selection Timeline
Activity Target Dates
Submission of Form for Confirmation of July 20, 2021
Entry of QARES winner to Gawad TOP
Awards
Screening and Reevaluation of QARES July 22, 2021
winners per Category
Evaluation of Project and/Oral July 23, 2021
Presentation
Interview July 26, 2021
Recognition and Awarding Ceremony July 28, 2021
IV. Committee
Over-all Chairman: Elisa L. Surwela,Ed.D

Co Chairman: Joseph A. Angeles
Screening and Evaluation Committee
Best Class Adviser and Best Researcher
Chairperson: Magnolia Silva-Mission
Members: Jerwin A. Gutierrez
Joseph A. Angeles
Best Year Level and Best FB Live Demo Teacher

Chairperson: Jeffrey E. Lagaya
Members: Edwin O. Surwela
Maria Celedonia M. Katigbak
Best Reading Teacher and Best Coordinator

Chairperson: Eleonor R. Benter

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
Members: Mercedes C. de Torres

Aileen O. Samson
Best Non-Teaching Personnel/ Best Innovative Project

Chairperson: Librada L. Solis
Members: Thelma M. Lanto
Jay Ariel A. Cinco
Most Interactive Online and Modular Class

Chairperson: Remy L. Untalan
Members: Indira M. Lobo
Myrna D. Reyes
Best Writer and Best Evaluator

Chairperson: Myrna O. Gatdula
Members: Marilou B. Rodriguez
Rowena A. Pesa
Committee on Awards/ Resources
Chairperson: Librada L. Solis
Members: Eleonor R. Benter
Arnel C. Vinas
Noel De Ocampo
Jaypee B. Faderanga
Documentation
Chairperson:
Members: Magnolia Silva- Mission
Bill Rei Pagba
Lea Cabar
Program
Chairperson: Remy L. Untalan
Members: Annabel T. Amorao
Kenneth H. Abante
Caselyn V. Roncales
Reagan Pineda
ANNEX 1
CONFRIMATION OF ENTRY FORM

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
GAWAD INOMARA TOP AWARDS 2021

INOSLOBAN- MARAWOY INTEGRATED NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL TOP AWARDS 2021
(TOP- TEACHING AND NON-TEACHING OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE AWARDS 2021)
ENTRY FORM
______________________________
Category
Nominee’s Name
(Surname, First Name, Middle Name)
Nominee’s Department
Latest Performance Rating
Advising Class and/or Ancillary
Assignment/s
Civic Organization/s Affiliated with
Nominator’s Name
Nominator’s Signature/Date
Nomination Justification:
The following outline is provided to describe key qualities, traits, or characteristics of the nominee.
1) Describe how the nominee demonstrates excellence in the area of _________________, give specific
examples:
2) List the nominee’s outstanding accomplishments, such as awards, speakerships, etc.

* Use a separate sheet if needed
ANNEX 2
AWARD CRITERA

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
Category 1: Most Outstanding Researcher

This category is open to all teaching and nonteaching staff who have made outstanding
contributions in the field of education through research. The nominees shall be judged according to the
following criteria.
This covers all research conducted from 2019-2020 and that the papers has been presented in at least one
research forum.
a. International, National, Regional, and Division Research Presentations – 30%
b. Seminars/Training Attended Related to Research – 20%
c. Awards/Speakerships/Panel Memberships/Publications Related to Research – 20%
d. Membership in Recognized Research Organizations – 15%
e. Latest Performance Rating – 15%
Category 2: Most Outstanding Reading Coordinator

The contest is open to all teachers designated as reading coordinators. They will be judged
according to the following criteria.
a. Serve as advocates for students who struggle with reading. 15%
b. Work collaboratively with other teachers to build and implement the reading program for
individuals and groups of students. 15%
c. Use instructional approaches to meet the specific needs of students who struggle with
reading. 20%
d. Use a wide range of texts (e.g., narrative, expository, and poetry) from traditional print,
digital, and online resources. 20%
e. Promote the value of reading in and out of school by modeling a positive attitude toward
reading with students, colleagues, administrators, and parents and guardians. 30%
Category 3: Most Outstanding Coordinator

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
The contest is open to all teachers designated as coordinators. They will be judged according
to the following criteria.
a. Maintain project calendars and update weekly status reports. 15%
b. Schedule program work, oversee daily operations and set priorities for managing the
program. 15%
c. Coordinate meetings and activities with administrators, colleagues, students, and other
partners. 20%
d. Act as a liaison between parents, coaches, students, administrators, and teachers 25%
e. Ensure all program activity is carried out with due regard to health and safety and the
safeguarding of children and young people. 25%
Category 4: Most Outstanding Module Evaluator
Qualifications
The nominee must:
1. be a teacher of the institution for at least two (2) years on the day of nomination.
2. have submitted supporting documents (e.g., certificates, written letter/certification from
the chairperson of the DepEd-sponsored activities related to the category) dated 2016
onwards, on or before the deadline; and
3. have a good standing and has not been sanctioned to any administrative and/or legal case
at least three (3) years to the day of nomination.
INDICATORS EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR

A. Work Experience
(80 points)
1. Written learning The nominee has The nominee has The nominee has
resources written 4 or more written 2-3 learning written at least 1
learning resources resources (10 points) learning resource (5
(20 points) points)
2. Edited learning The nominee has The nominee has The nominee has
resources edited 4 or more edited 2-3 learning edited at least 1
learning resources resources (10 points) learning resource (5
(20 points) points)

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
3. evaluated learning The nominee has The nominee has The nominee has
resources such as evaluated 4 or more evaluated 2-3 evaluated at least 1
modules, books, and learning resources learning resources learning resource (5
the like (20 points) (10 points) points)
4. served as a coach, The nominee has The nominee has The nominee has
resource speaker or been a coach, been a coach, been a coach,
discussant on events resource speaker or resource speaker or resource speaker or
relevant to evaluating discussant on events discussant on events discussant on events
content, writing, and relevant to relevant to relevant to evaluating
editing evaluating content, evaluating content, content, writing, and
writing, and editing writing, and editing editing at least once
for 4 or more times for 2-3 times (10 (5 points)
(20 points) points)
B. Trainings and
Workshops
(20 points)
1. number of The nominee has The nominee has The nominee has
trainings attended attended 3 or more attended 2 trainings, attended 1 training,
relevant to evaluating trainings, workshops, or workshop, or
content, writing, and workshops, or conferences relevant conference relevant
editing conferences to evaluating to evaluating content,
relevant to content, writing, and writing, and editing
evaluating content, editing (6 points) (3 points)
writing, and editing
(10 points)

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
2. level of training The nominee has The nominee has The nominee has
attended (just the attended a National attended a Division attended a School
highest) or International or Regional Level Level training,
Level training, training, workshop, workshop, or
workshop, or or conference conference relevant
conference relevant relevant to to evaluating content,
to evaluating evaluating content, writing, and editing
content, writing, writing, and editing (3 points)
and editing (10 (6 points)
points)
TOTAL 100 points
Category 5: Most Outstanding Learning Module Writer

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
Qualifications
The nominee must:
1. be a teacher of the institution for at least two (2) years on the day of nomination.
2. have submitted supporting documents (e.g., certificates, written letter/certification from
the chairperson of the DepEd-sponsored activities related to the category) dated 2016
onwards, on or before the deadline; and
3. have a good standing and has not been sanctioned to any administrative and/or legal case
at least three (3) years to the day of nomination.
INDICATORS EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR

A. Produced Modules
Number of Modules The nominee has The nominee has The nominee has
Written written 4 or written 2 or 3 learning written 1 learning
more learning modules. (20 points) module. (10 points)
modules. (30
points)
The nominee’s The nominee’s The nominee’s
Level of Utilization written module written module is written module is
(just the highest) is used in the used in the Regional used in the Division
International or Level. or School Level.
National Level. (10 points) (5 points)
(20 points)
B. Trainings &
Workshops
Attended Trainings, The nominee The nominee attended The nominee
Conferences, and attended 3 or 2 trainings, attended 1 training,
Workshops on Writing more trainings, conferences, or conference, or
Modules conferences, or workshops relevant to workshop relevant to
workshops writing modules. writing modules.
relevant to (20 points) (10 points)
writing modules.
(30 points)
Level of Attended The nominee The nominee attended The nominee
Trainings, Conferences, attended a a training, conference, attended a training,
and Workshops on training, or workshop in the conference, or

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
Writing Modules (just conference, or Regional or Division workshop in the

the highest) workshop in the Level. (10 points) School Level. (10
International or points)
National Level.
(20 points)
TOTAL 100 points
Category 6: Most Outstanding FB Live Demonstration Teacher

Mechanics:
1. This contest covers only the FB live demo-teachings done from Oct. 2020 until May
31 in the Lipa City Division.
2. All FB Live Demo Teachers from each Grade level are qualified.
3. One winner for each grade level will be declared.
Criteria:
 Views ………………………………………………….. 20%
 Craftmanship………………………………………… 30%
 Pedagogy & Development of Lesson/s………… 50%
100%
Category 7: Most Outstanding Class Adviser
A.
The category is open to all class adviser of the current school year. A pre-qualifying
round shall be done through online voting of all teachers in the grade level. Each
teacher shall choose his/her 3 nominees through a Google form. Three teachers with
the highest votes shall then be rated by the corresponding grade level evaluators,
composed of the head teacher, the master teacher/s and/or a non-adviser, based on the
criteria that follow.
Instructional Competence (30)

- Prepares and submit Lesson Exemplar.
- Conducts remedial sessions and intervention for low performing students.
- Uses appropriate, adequate and updated instructional materials.
- Develops the lessons in compliance with the curriculum guide.
- Employs the appropriate assessment strategies to evaluate and monitor learning.

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
- Sets students’ target competencies and outcomes to be achieved in terms of

skills, knowledge, attitude and values.
a. Professional Competence (30)
- Updates students’ records on academic and behavioral performances
- Submits pertinent records and school forms on time and with efficiency.
- Performs homeroom guidance, parent-teacher conference, home visitation,
group counseling and peer counselling.
- Monitors class attendance and classroom cleanliness/orderliness
- Manifest’s punctuality and professionalism in observance to the Code of Ethics
for Professional Teachers and Child Protection Policy
- Pursues continuous professional development by attending seminars and
trainings and enrolling in post-graduate studies.
b. Community Service (10)

- Participants in community and civic movements/advocacies done beyond the
actual school hours.
- Serves as chairperson, proponent, mentor, moderator or coach in any
community program or activity.
c. Personal Characteristics (30)

- Demonstrates positive traits in both private and public aspects of life.
- Friendly, compassionate, and tactful
Team player and has good working rapport with colleagues.
- Initiates, facilitates, and builds inter-community relations.
- Maintains wholesome relations with community stakeholders and local partners.
- Demonstrates transparency, honesty, accountability, and personal integrity.
Category 8: Most Outstanding Interactive Online Class Teacher
RUBRIC DIRECTIONS: The rubric shown has four (4) separate elements that contribute
to an online class level of interaction and interactivity. For each of these four elements, circle

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
the corresponding point that applies best to the online class. After reviewing all elements and
circling the appropriate point, add up the points to determine the online class level of
interactive qualities.
Above
Element Low Minimum Moderate High Sco
Average
s 1pt 2pt 3pt 5pt re
4pt
Instructi Instructio Instructional In In addition In addition to
onal nal activities require addition to requiring requiring
Designs activities students to to students to students to
for do not communicate requiring communicat communicate
Interacti require with the teacher students e with the with the
on two-way on an individual to teacher, teacher,
interactio basis only communi instructional instructional
n between (e.g.,asking/resp cate with activities activities
teacher onding to the require require
and instructor teacher, students to students to
students; questions). instructio develop develop
they call nal outputs by outputs by
for one- activities working working
way require together together
delivery students cooperativel cooperatively
of to y (e.g., in (e.g., in pairs
informati communi pairs or in or in small
on (e.g., cate with small groups) and
teacher one groups) and share results
lectures, another sharing and feedback
text (e.g., feedback. with other
delivery) discussion groups in the
and s in pairs class.
student or in
outputs small
based on groups)
the
informati
on.
Interacti Web E-mail, In In addition In addition to

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
pages or conference/bullet
addition to technologies
other in board, or other
to technologies used for two-
technolog technology technolog used for way
y resource resource allows
ies used two-way exchanges of
allows two-way, for two- synchronous text
one-way asynchronous way and information,
delivery exchanges of asynchron asynchronou visual
of information (text
ous s exchanges technologies
informati and graphics).exchanges of written such as two-
on (text of information, way video or
vity of
and/or informati additional videoconfere
Technolo
graphics). on, chat technologies ncing
gy
room or (e.g., technologies
Resource
other teleconferen allow
s
technolog cing) allow synchronous
y allows one way voice and
synchrono visual and visual
us two-way communicati
exchanges voice ons between
of communicati teacher and
primarily ons between students and
written teacher and among
informati students students.
on.
Evidence By end of By end of By end of By end of By end of
of class most course, most course, all course, most course, all or
Learner students students (50%- or nearly students nearly all
Engagem (50%- 75%) are all (50%-75%) students
ent 75%) are replying to students are both (90%-100%)
replying messages from (90%- replying to are both
to the teacher, and 100%) are and replying to
messages other students, replying initiating and initiating
from both when to messages, messages,
the required and on a messages both when both when
teacher, voluntary basis, from the required and required and
but only replies are short teacher, voluntarily; voluntarily;
when but usually and other most most

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
required, responsive to students, messages are messages are

messages. topics. both when detailed and detailed,
are short required responsive responsive to
and and to topics, but topics, and
sometime voluntaril may be reflect efforts
s y; replies wordy or to
unrespons are rambling communicate
ive to detailed well.
topics. and
responsiv
e to
topics.
Teacher Teacher responds Teacher Teacher Teacher
responds to most student responds responds to responds to
only queries; to all all student all student
randomly responses usually student queries; queries;
to student are within 48 queries; responses responses are
queries; hours; feedback responses usually are always
responses sometimes offers usually prompt, i.e., prompt, i.e.,
usually some analysis of are within within 24 within 24
take more student work and 48 hours; hours; hours;
than 48 suggestions for feedback feedback feedback
Evidence hours; improvement. sometime always always offers
of feedback s offers offers detailed
Teacher is brief some detailed analysis of
Engagem and analysis analysis of student work
ent provides of student student work and
little work and and suggestions
analysis suggestio suggestions for
of student ns for for improvement,
work or improvem improvemen along with
suggestio ent. t. additional
ns for hints and
improvem information
ent. to
supplement
learning.

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
Reference: Source: Based on concepts in Roblyer, M. D. & Ekhaml, D. (2000). How

interactive are YOUR distance courses? A rubric for assessing interaction in distance
learning. The Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3(2).
Category 9: Most Outstanding Interactive Modular Class Teacher

RUBRIC DIRECTIONS: The rubric shown has two (2) separate elements that contribute to
an online class level of interaction and interactivity. For each of these two elements, circle
the corresponding point that applies best to the online class. After reviewing all elements and
circling the appropriate point, add up the points to determine the online class level of
interactive qualities.
Elements Low Minimum Moderate Above High Scor

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
Average
1pt 2pt 3pt 5pt e
4pt
By end of By end of By end of By end of By end of
class most course, course, all course, course, all
students most or nearly all most or nearly all
(50%-75%) students students students students
are (50%-75%) (90%- (50%-75%) (90%-
replying to are replying 100%) are are both 100%) are
messages to messages replying to replying to both
from from the messages and replying to
the teacher, teacher, and from the initiating and
but only other teacher, and messages, initiating
Evidence
when students, other both when messages,
of Learner
required, both when students, required and both when
Engageme
messages. required and both when voluntarily; required and
nt
are short on a required and most voluntarily;
and voluntary voluntarily; messages most
sometimes basis, replies are are detailed messages
unresponsiv replies are detailed and and are detailed,
e to topics. short but responsive responsive responsive
usually to topics. to topics, to topics,
responsive but may be and reflect
to topics. wordy or efforts to
rambling communicat
e well.
Evidence Teacher Teacher Teacher Teacher Teacher
of Teacher responds responds to responds to responds to responds to
Engageme only most all student all student all student
nt randomly to student queries; queries; queries;
student queries; responses responses responses
queries; responses usually are usually are are always
responses usually are within 48 prompt, i.e., prompt, i.e.,
usually take within 48 hours; within 24 within 24
more than hours; feedback hours; hours;
48 hours; feedback sometimes feedback feedback
feedback is sometimes offers some always always
brief and offers some analysis of offers offers

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
provides analysis of student detailed detailed

little student work and analysis of analysis of
analysis of work and suggestions student student
student suggestions for work and work and
work or for improveme suggestions suggestions
suggestions improveme nt. for for
for nt. improveme improveme
improveme nt. nt, along
nt. with
additional
hints and
information
to
supplement
learning.
Reference: Source: Based on concepts in Roblyer, M. D. & Ekhaml, D. (2000). How

interactive are YOUR distance courses? A rubric for assessing interaction in distance
learning. The Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3(2).
Category 10: Most Outstanding Innovative Project

The contest is open to all teaching and non-teaching personnel who has drafted an
innovation intended to raise productivity and efficiency and/of quality of learning. Together
with the nomination form, approved project proposal and accomplishment report.
The project shall be rated on the following criteria”
a. Project Objective 15%
The proposed project is aligned with DepEd thrusts and contributory to the
attainment of the Department’s Vision and Mission. The proposed project must be qualified
to benefit the learners and other school stakeholders.
b. Oral Presentation 35%

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
The proponent must present the reasons for the project, and what the needs or the
problem he/she wants to solve/address and innovate. He /she may support the presentation
with project design in printed tarpaulin or digital format.
c. Project Management 35%
The project must have a realistic management plan and the resources needed to
complete the project within a calendar year.
d. Sustainability and Replicability 15%
The project must have a provision for sustainability and replicability.
Category 11: Most Outstanding Non-Teaching Personnel
This category is open to all non-teaching personnel of Inosloban-Marawoy Integrated

National High School who worked to raise productivity and efficiency in the workplace.
The non-teaching personnel shall be rated using the following criteria:
1. Occupational Competence 40%
a. Work Accomplishment (20)
b. Human Relations (20)

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
2. Outstanding Accomplishment 20%

a. Innovation/Creativity (10)
b. Publication/Authorship (5)
c. Speakership/Consultancy (5)
3. Professional Growth 20%

a. Education (10)
b. Training (10)
4. Attitude 10%
a. Interest and dedication (4)
b. Cooperation and Reliability (3)
c. Leadership (3)
5. Personal Characteristics/Personality 10%

_______________
TOTAL 100%
Category 12: Most Outstanding Grade Level

Criteria:
 Least drop-out cases
 Least cases of 74 and below grades
 Most number of With Honors to With High Honors
 Most number of FB Live demo-teachers
 Most number of Writers and Evaluators
 Won in any DepEd Recognized Contest
National Level Regional Level
Rank 1 = 9 points Rank 1 = 7 points

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
Rank 3 onwards = 5 points Rank 3 onwards = 3 points

and participant and participant
Division Level School Level

Rank 3 onwards = 1 points Rank 3 onwards = 1 points
and participant and participant
Winner will be determined through pointing system. In every category, plus points on
winning in any DepEd Recognized Contest, top five will be chosen.
- Rank 1 = 9 points
- Rank 2 = 7 points
- Rank 3 = 5 points
- Rank 4 = 3 points
- Rank 5 and 6 = 1 points
Category 13: Outstanding Service Award
This award will be given to teachers who have rendered 20 years and above service in
Inosloba-Marawoy Integrated National High School. For this year, all teachers who
have rendered 20 years and above will be given an award but for the succeeding year
of this award all teachers who are in the exact year of 20th, 25th, 30th,35th and 40th in
service shall receive the award. Recipients of Service Award were chosen based on
plantilla records.
LIST OF NOMINEES, FINALISTS AND WINNERS
Category 1: Most Outstanding Researcher
Finalists:
1 Eden G. Garcia Best Researcher
Winner:
1 Eden G. Garcia Best Researcher
Category 2: Most Outstanding Reading Coordinator

Finalists:
1 Rose Ann J. Morales Best Reading Coordinator
2 Cristina M. Inciong Best Reading Coordinator

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
3 Maria Jessa L. Buli-Buli Best Reading Coordinator

4 Janet M. Bandohan Best Reading Coordinator
5 Gloria F. Fabula Best Reading Coordinator
6 Janice O Macatangay Best Reading Coordinator
7 Maureen A. Virrey Best Reading Coordinator
8 Babylyn R. Dalisay Best Reading Coordinator
Winner:
Category 3: Most Outstanding Coordinator
Finalists:
1 Rose Ann J. Morales Best Coordinator
2 Caselyn V. Roncales Best Coordinator
3 Eva B. Manjares Best Coordinator
4 Roland F. Fesalbon Best Coordinator
5 Joan M. Almarez Best Coordinator
Winner:
Category 4: Most Outstanding Module Evaluator
Finalists:
Best Evaluator 1 Ronald L. Lozano Best Evaluator (Grade 8)
2 Glen O. Gacias Best Evaluator (Grade 10)
Winner:
Category 5: Most Outstanding Learning Module Writer

Finalists:
1 Kenneth H. Abante Best Writer (Grade 7)
2 Ronald L. Lozano Best Writer (Grade 8)
3 Rosalie C. Ramirez Best Writer (Grade 9)
4 Jennelyn E. Daluz Best Writer (Grade 10)
5 Catherine A. Matienzo Best Writer (Grade 11)
6 Daisy G. Jurilla Best Writer (Grade 12)
Winner:
Category 6: Most Outstanding FB Live Demonstration Teacher

Finalists:
1 Kenneth H. Abante Best FB Live Demo Teacher (Grade 7)

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
2 Minerva P. Sotomil Best FB Live Demo Teacher (Grade 8)

3 Billy Rei M. Pagba Best FB Live Demo Teacher (Grade 9)
4 Patrick Jay S. Mendoza Best FB Live Demo Teacher (Grade 10)
5 Alvin L. Montealto Best FB Live Demo Teacher (Grade 11)
6 Virna Liza De Ocampo Best FB Live Demo Teacher (Grade 12)
Winner:
Category 7: Most Outstanding Class Adviser
Finalists:
1 Michael H. Calibara Best Class Adviser (Grade 7)
2 Aileen O. Samson Best Class Adviser (Grade 8)
3 Noel A. De Ocampo Best Class Adviser (Grade 9)
4 Jovelyn M. Maralit Best Class Adviser (Grade 10)
5 Catherine A. Matienzo Best Class Adviser (Grade 11)
6 Rence A. Andal Best Class Adviser (Grade 12)
Winner:
Category 8: Most Outstanding Interactive Online Class Teacher

Finalists:
1 Rose Ann J. Morales Best Online Class Teacher (Grade 7)
2 Gerald P. Mendoza Best Online Class Teacher (Grade 9)
3 Jenelyn E. Daluz Best Online Class Teacher (Grade 10)
4 Hyacinth Silvestre Best Online Class Teacher (Grade 11)
5 Lea Cabar Best Online Class Teacher (Grade 12)
Winner:
Category 9: Most Outstanding Interactive Modular Class Teacher

Finalists:
1 Michael H. Calibara Best Modular Class Teacher (Grade 7)
2 Joan M. Almarez Best Modular Class Teacher (Grade 8)
3 Noel A. De Ocampo Best Modular Class Teacher (Grade 9)
4 Jovelyn M. Maralit Best Modular Class Teacher (Grade 10)
5 Joanna A. Pabelonia Best Modular Class Teacher (Grade 11)
6 Virna Liza B. De Ocampo Best Modular Class Teacher (Grade 12)
Winner:
Category 10: Most Outstanding Innovative Project

Finalists:
1 Jumpstart ODL Most Innovative Project

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
Winner:
1 Jumpstart ODL Most Innovative Project
Category 11: Most Outstanding Non-Teaching Personnel

Finalists:
1 Glaiza D. Llanes Best Non-Teaching Personnel
2 Maria Celedonia M.Katigbak Best Non-Teaching Personnel
Winner:
Category 12: Most Outstanding Grade Level

Finalists:
Winner:
Category 13: Outstanding Service Award

BENTER, ELEONOR R January 2, 1996 25 years
SOLIS, LIBRADA L October 31,1989 32 years
ALTAMIRANO, GINA T July 9, 1992 28 years and 11 months
CUETO, MELANIE P September 1,1989 32 years
DALUZ, JENELYN E August 25, 1999 21years and 9 months
DE TORRES, MERCEDES C January 24, 1992 29 years
DIMAANO, GLICERIA U June 27, 2001 20 years
GATDULA, MYRNA O September 9,1989 31 years
LANTO, THELMA M Nov 1, 1995 26 years
LOBO, INDIRA M Dec 7 1994 26 years
MACALINTAL, VIOLETA T December 1, 1995 25 years and 5 months

MARAWOY, LIPA CITY
MANALO, JOSIE M July 27,1987 34 years

MANJARES, EVA B August 15.1996 24 years and 10 months
PESA, ROWENA A June 16,1993 28 years
PLETE, SONIA E August 1,1987 34 years
RODRIGUEZ, MARILOU B June 25, 1992 29 years
VALENCIA, PABLITO M Dec. 16,1994 27 years
VILLAPANDO, BLAS J August 31, 1987 37 years
VINAS, ARNEL C January 24, 1992 29 years


Department of Education: Gawad Inomara Top Awards 2021

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Department of Education: Gawad Inomara Top Awards 2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

GAWAD INOMARA TOP AWARDS 2021

I. Rationale and Purpose

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

Over-all Chairman: Elisa L. Surwela,Ed.D

Best Year Level and Best FB Live Demo Teacher

Best Reading Teacher and Best Coordinator

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

Members: Mercedes C. de Torres

Best Non-Teaching Personnel/ Best Innovative Project

Most Interactive Online and Modular Class

Best Writer and Best Evaluator

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

GAWAD INOMARA TOP AWARDS 2021

(TOP- TEACHING AND NON-TEACHING OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE AWARDS 2021)

Civic Organization/s Affiliated with

2) List the nominee’s outstanding accomplishments, such as awards, speakerships, etc.

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

Category 1: Most Outstanding Researcher

Category 2: Most Outstanding Reading Coordinator

a. Serve as advocates for students who struggle with reading. 15%

Category 3: Most Outstanding Coordinator

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

a. Maintain project calendars and update weekly status reports. 15%

INDICATORS EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

TOTAL 100 points

Category 5: Most Outstanding Learning Module Writer

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

INDICATORS EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

Writing Modules (just conference, or Regional or Division workshop in the

Category 6: Most Outstanding FB Live Demonstration Teacher

Instructional Competence (30)

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

- Sets students’ target competencies and outcomes to be achieved in terms of

b. Community Service (10)

c. Personal Characteristics (30)

Category 8: Most Outstanding Interactive Online Class Teacher

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

required, responsive to students, messages are messages are

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

Reference: Source: Based on concepts in Roblyer, M. D. & Ekhaml, D. (2000). How

Category 9: Most Outstanding Interactive Modular Class Teacher

Elements Low Minimum Moderate Above High Scor

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

provides analysis of student detailed detailed

Reference: Source: Based on concepts in Roblyer, M. D. & Ekhaml, D. (2000). How

Category 10: Most Outstanding Innovative Project

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

Category 11: Most Outstanding Non-Teaching Personnel

This category is open to all non-teaching personnel of Inosloban-Marawoy Integrated

Address: Marawoy, Lipa City

2. Outstanding Accomplishment 20%

3. Professional Growth 20%

5. Personal Characteristics/Personality 10%

Category 12: Most Outstanding Grade Level