16 March 2021 Characteristics of A Good Test: Name: BUNGA REFIRA (1830104008) Class: Tbi 6 A Subject: Lla

You might also like

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

NAME : BUNGA REFIRA (1830104008)

CLASS : TBI 6 A

SUBJECT : LLA

16 March 2021

Characteristics of a Good Test

REALIBILITY
REALIBILITY

VALIDITY

VALIDITY PRACTICAL
VALIDITY PRACTICAL
ITY
ITY

CHARACTERISTICS OF A
GOOD TEST
According to Alderson
(1995:5) validity is refers
to the extent to which a
test measures what it is
intended to measure

According to Bush,
Michael (2016:2) According to Hutauruk,
validity is refers to Bertaria Sonata
extent to which the test DEFINITION OF (2015:49) validity is the
DEFINITION OF extent to which a test
measures what it VALIDITY
VALIDITY measures what it is
intends to measure
supposed to measure.

According
According to Bush, Hutauruk, Bertaria
to Bush,
Sonata (2015:50) imagine imagine someone
someone
who
who believes that people’s index
believes that people’s index finger
finger
length
length reflects
reflects their
their self-esteem
self-esteem and and
therefore
therefore tries
tries to
to measure
measure self-esteem
self-esteem by by
holding
holding aa ruler
ruler upup to
to people’s
people’s index
index fingers.
fingers.
Although
Although this
this measure
measure would
would have
have
According to Bush, Michael extremely
According to Alderson (1995:6)
According to
extremely good
good test-retest
test-retest reliability,
reliability, itit
(2016:2) example of validity is would
example
example of
of validity is the
validity is the test
test you
you
would have
have absolutely
absolutely nono validity.
validity. The
The fact
fact
when an intelligent test is that use
use to
to make
make valid
valid predictions
predictions
that one
one person’s
person’s index
index finger
finger is
is aa
about
about someone's
someone's technical
technical
developed to assess the level of centimeter
centimeter longer
longer than
than another’s
another’s would
would
proficiency
proficiency on on the
the job
job may
may not
not
indicate
indicate nothing
nothing about
about which
which one
one higher
higher
intelligence, it should assess the be
be valid for predicting his or
valid for predicting his or her
her
self-esteem.
self-esteem.
intelligence of the person, not leadership
leadership skills
skills oror absenteeism
absenteeism
other factors. rate.
rate. This
This leads
leads to to the
the next
next
principle of assessment.
principle of assessment.

EXAMPLES OF
EXAMPLES OF
VALIDITY
VALIDITY
According to Alderson (1995:5) Validity categories include:

 Face validity is the judgement of users of the test, including


aviation subject matter experts, that the test is appropriate to the
domain and target skills.

 Construct validity is the extent to which performance on the


test can be interpreted as a meaningful measure of language
proficiency.

 Content validity is the extent to which test content is a


representative sample of the domain-related language and skills.

 Predictive validity is the extent to which performance on a test


is predictive of subsequent performance in non-test settings.

VALIDITY
VALIDITY
CATEGORIES
CATEGORIES

According to Hutauruk, Bertaria Sonata (2015:51)

1. Content Validity, When we want to find out if the entire content


of the behavior/construct/area is represented in the test we
compare the test task with the content of the behavior.

2. Face Validity, Basically face validity refers to the degree to which


a test appears to measure what it purports to measure.

3. Criterion-Oriented or Predictive Validity, used to predict future


or current performance - it correlates test results with another
criterion of interest.

4. Concurrent Validity, the degree to which the scores on a test are


related to the scores on another, already established, test
administered at the same time, or to some other valid criterion.
available at the same time.
Hutauruk, Bertaria
Sonata.2015. A
Compilation Material of
English Language Testing. Alderson, J.C., Clapham, C. &
Pematang Siantar: HKBP Wall, D.1995. Language Test
Bush, Michael.2016. Construction and Evaluation
Differences between ‘Group’ Cambridge: Cambridge
and ‘Team’. Nigeria: Delta University Press
State University

REFERENCES

Question : What should we do to


ensure the validity of a test? And what
is the solution if the ‘

test is invalid?

You might also like