Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CREW: CFTC: Regarding Efforts To Influence Financial Regulatory Reform: 3/18/11 - CFTC-CREW-0461
CREW: CFTC: Regarding Efforts To Influence Financial Regulatory Reform: 3/18/11 - CFTC-CREW-0461
2 [Note: Allpage and line numbers in this document refer to the House Agriculture Committee
3 bill.]
4 [Explanation: To address concerns regarding the application ofthe Core Principle on position
5 limits for SEFs in the context of voice brokerage, the amendments below would clarify that:
6 1) the requirement to adopt position limits or accountability applies only if the SEF is a trading
7 facility and only to positions in contracts listedfor trading on the facility; 2) where the CFTC or
8 SEC has set a position limit, the SEF need not do so (unless it elects to set a lower limit), and
9 need only monitor trading for compliance with all applicable limits; and 3) a SEF may delegate
12
13 (a) On page 77, strike lines 4-19 and insert the following;
14
15 "(6) POSITION LIMITS OR ACCOUNTABILITY.-
19 is a trading facility shall adopt for each of its contracts listed for trading on the
CFTC-CREW-0461
1 "(i) may set a position limitation at a level that is lower than the
4 execution facility for compliance with the limit set by the Commission and
8 (1) On page 100, line 11 and page 101, line 11, redesignate subsections (b) and (c) as
10 (2) On page 100, line 10, insert after subsection (a) the following:
11 "(b) Section 5c(b) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 7a-2(b)) is amended in paragraphs (1), (2), and
12 (3) by inserting "or swap execution facility" after "contract market" each place that it
13 appears.".
14
15
CFTC-CREW-0462
1 DELETION OF CONFIRMATION FACILITY FROM
4 [Explanation: The amendment below would delete the term "confirmation facility" from the
5 definition ofa swap execution facility. The term is undefined, and is extremely vague. Further,
6 the Administration's proposal contemplated that a swap execution facility shouldplay some role
7 in executing or facilitating the execution ofswaps. A facility that serves simply to confirm that a
11
12
CFTC-CREW-0463
1 RELATION TO OTHER LAW, DEPARTMENTS, OR AGENCIES
2 [Explanation: Thefirst set ofamendments below would amend CEA Section 12(e), which
3 provides for preemption ofState law, by: 1) making certain necessary conforming amendments;
4 and 2) providing that swaps may not be regulated as insurance contracts under State law.
6 Section 2(a)(1)(A) - to delete the existing reference to a derivatives transaction execution facility
7 and replace it with a reference to a swap execution facility instead, as reflected in the second set
8 ofamendments below.]
11 (a) in subsection (e)(I)(B) by inserting "or (3)" after "paragraph (2)"; and
12 (b) in subsection (e)(2) by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting the following:
14 "(B) an agreement, contract, or transaction that is excluded from this Act under
15 section 2(c) or 2( f) of this Act or title IV of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of
16 2000, or exempted under section 4(c) of this Act (regardless of whether any such
18 "(3) A swap may not be regulated as an insurance contract under State law.".
19
22 (b) in line 11, strike the period and insert"; and"; and
CFTC-CREW-0464
1 (3) by striking "derivatives transaction execution facility" and inserting "swap
CFTC-CREW-0465
1 BACK OFFICE STANDARDS
3 [Explanation: It does not appear that the reference to "back office" standards in the provisions
4 ofthe legislation regarding swap dealers and major swap participants adds to the list of
6 documentation, and valuation ofswaps or security-based swaps). Accordingly, the first set of
7 amendments below would delete the term from these provisions, and clarify that the standards
8 shall apply to the specifically enumerated activities. Alternatively, this subsection could be
9 deleted and its substance moved into the subsection regarding business conduct standards, as
11
12 First Alternative:
14
15 (b) On page 70, line 3, strike "documentation and back office standards" and insert "the
17
18 (c) On page 182, line 1, strike "AND BACK OFFICE"; and
19
20 (d) On page 182, lines 14-15, strike "documentation and back office standards" and insert
22
23 Second Alternative:
24
CFTC-CREW-0466
1
3
4 "(D) timely and accurate confirmation, processing, netting, documentation, and
10
11 (e) On page 70, line 5, strike "(i) and insert "(h)";
12
13 (f) On page 180, line 4, strike "and";
14
16
17 "(D) timely and accurate confirmation, processing, netting, documentation, and
19
21
23
24 0) On page 182, line 17, strike "(i) and insert "(h)"; and
25
26 (k) On page 185, lines 3 and 16, strike "0)" and "(k)" and insert "(i)" and "0)", respectively.
27
7
CFTC-CREW-0467
1 UNCONDITIONAL REGISTRATION EXEMPTIONS FOR CLEARINGHOUSES
2 [Explanation: The amendments below are designed to: 1) make the unconditional exemptions
3 applicable to registered DCOs and securities clearing agencies parallel to one another; and
4 2) eliminate the needfor the CFTC and SEC to assess each other's regulatory programs
5 relating to clearing.
6 (1) The House Agriculture Bill provides that a securities clearing agency is
7 unconditionally exempt from DCO registration "under this section." Because the referenced
8 section is the general registration requirement for DCOs, the effect would be to permit a
9 securities clearing agency to clear any swap (including non-security related swaps such as
10 agricultural and energy swaps) - and any futures contract - without obtaining a DCO license.]
11 The amendments below would narrow this exemption to swaps on broad-based security indices.
12 (2) The bill also gives the CFTC and SEC the authority to override this unconditional
13 exemption if the agency finds that the clearinghouse is not subject to "comparable,
15 should not be placed in the position ofpassingjudgment on the adequacy ofanother agency's
17
18 (a) On page 36, line 12, strike "under this section," and all that follows through line 16 and
20
21
1 Because the comparable exemption for DCOs is not placed in the general clearinghouse registration provision of
the securities laws but rather in the new provision for clearing security-based swaps, it is not clear that a similar
amendment is necessary on the securities side of the bill. Nevertheless, for purposes of clarity and parallelism, the
amendments below also would modify that provision.
CFTC-CREW-0468
1 "solely for the purpose of clearing swaps on a security index that is not a narrow-
4 (b) On page 150, strike lines 4-8 and insert the following:
6
7
CFTC-CREW-0469
1 AMENDMENT TO DEFINITION OF "SWAP DEALER"
2 [Explanation: The "purchase and resale to customers" wording of the "swap dealer" definition
3 in the House Agriculture Committee may not work well in the swaps context. The amendment
4 below is intended to be technical, not substantive, and to more accurately capture the concept of
5 being willing to accept either side ofa swap transaction. A parallel amendment is providedfor
10
13
10
CFTC-CREW-0470