We Need Deep Generalists Rather Than Specialists

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Authors like David Epstein territories. Liberal arts spotting.

spotting. Signals are seeds of even within the constraints These are much needed to
argue for learning by doing education has long realised future events, discoveries of current syllabi. solve the problems plaguing

Why we need a variety of things to


develop an intellectual
range — a deep generalist, a
term attributed to scholar
this. So, physics and
philosophy go
simultaneously in many
institutions. From Oxford to
and news items. A signal
seeker has an
interdisciplinary mind. A
daily thought exercise to
Why now?
Automation continues to
wipe out many jobs, and
the world, from climate
change to terrorism and
resource depletion to
unemployment.

deep generalists
Warren Bennis and IIMs, engaging with the link unrelated developments algorithms are taking over If students focus on
popularised by corporate Humanities finds an entry in and predict their impact in a routine decision-making. specialisations with the sole
leader Aytekin Tank. the business curriculum. variety of domains is yet This allows us to engage objective of getting placed,
Scientists like Kepler, The secret is in the another useful way. This will more with creative problem- they will most likely be
Maxwell and Newton were learning habit, triggered by make us a theme-based or solving, innovation, systems unemployed soon after. Let
polymaths. Innovators and solution orientation and not problem-centred learner. thinking and emotional us prepare them for
Creative problem-solving, artists always combined grades. Learning a new Tinkering with options and agility. We need deep- anything they can fix their
innovation, systems knowledge areas; the most language or art form, or combinations is no more thinking humans in addition minds and hands to — as
significant feature of a deep community involvement can limited to designers. to deep-learning AI, deep generalists.
thinking and emotional generalist. Leonardo da ignite the learning gene in In an age of open courses, observes author Scott The views expressed are
agility are the Vinci was adept in art and novel ways. It helps to zoom- web resources, learning Hartley, whose extensive personal.
engineering. Steve Jobs in and zoom-out of the communities and social work shows that liberal arts
requirements for the blended design and context, on-demand. networks, it is not hard to and technical literacy The writer is Education Officer,
future, and our education technology. The idea is not Another tool is signal create deep generalists, complement each other. University Grants Commission.
to discard specialisation; on
system should be geared the contrary, it is to blend
for this knowledge units from
different domains to make a
cross-disciplinary thinker.
GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCK PHOTOS

Tools for diversified


learning
How can we develop
expertise in multiple areas
within a limited time?
Visual artist Jake Chapman
demonstrated one way. He
laddered the level of
expertise into five stages —
layman, beginner,
apprentice, journeyman
and master. Let us apply the
Pareto principle (which
states that, for many
b Salil Sahadevan : :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: generally favours specialists outcomes, roughly 80% of
A daily thought exercise over generalists, partly due the consequences come
It was as a classroom game to link unrelated to the perceived expertise from 20% of the causes)
inspired by Ikigai and some developments and and educational and assume that mastery
psychometric tests. We predict their impact credentials. But the actual takes 20 years of practice.
wrote the abilities, talents, in a variety of domains... question is whether we In that case, reaching
skills, and interests of each have the learning choices to journeyman status will take
student on different sticky experiment across only 48 months and 10
notes and asked them to unexpected disciplinary domains. This stems from months to reach the
visualise their future connections for which our the new debate on the skill apprentice level. If we
educational paths. But the curriculum is unprepared — sets that can help us structure our learning
exercise did not result in a realisation that our navigate an uncertain around this approach, a
any clear paths; instead, it education cannot afford to future. learner can move across
opened up uncharted roads remain limited to narrow two or three domains with
with different skill trees and specialisations. Making connections cross-learning possibilities
revealed new The game evokes the old According to Vikram in limited time.
specialisations for which debate between specialists Mansharamani of Harvard As a beginning, if we
courses do not exist. It led who have expertise in a University, it is not a permit youngsters to play
to an array of looped limited area versus specific skill but the sort of with diverse domains,
domains for which mono- generalists who have thinking that connects interests and passions, it
specialisations are divergent skills in varying multiple domains that will will allow them to move
insufficient. It spurred areas. Mainstream society get us ahead in the future. across knowledge

You might also like