Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2019 SS FunctionalMatNanoMat 01
2019 SS FunctionalMatNanoMat 01
SS 2019
Lecture(s) (3 SWS)
Seminar (1 SWS)
Labcourse (3 SWS)
tba
Tentative timeline / schedule L = lecture // S = seminar // X = no event
• Learn about surface and interface chemistry and, more important, how
control over the latter is key in several application fields
• Understand why often not one single method can be used to extract
(quantitative) information for / from nanomaterials
Introduction
What is a functional material?
www.impulse.de // JokaToons
What is a Nanomaterial?
https://oshwiki.eu/wiki/Nanomaterials
What is Nanotechnology?
www.nih.gov // https://slideplayer.com/slide/11378587/
What is Nanotechnology?
1986
Kim Eric Drexler
https://oshwiki.eu/wiki/Nanomaterials
Nanotechnology – Examples from our Daily Life
https://www.febreze.com/en-us
www.labo.de
„Aus dem Labor auf den Teller“ – BUND report 2008
Nanotechnology – Examples from our Daily Life
Polysorbat 80
E433
w+x+y+z = 20 (ca.)
http://www.ripesense.co.nz/ripesense_gallery.html
Nanotechnology – Examples from our Daily Life
„Aus dem Labor auf den Teller“ – BUND report 2008, updated 2015/2016
Nanotechnology – Risks?
We get in contact with nanomaterials via various pathways: skin contact, food /
beverages, air, …
So far, little if known about (long-time) risks / health issues. Why is that?
Φ
γ = ηdb
2
γ =
surface energy; η db surface density of dangling bonds
Φ =bond energy
Build-up of (multi-)
layers with nm In case of alloys, the formation of
precision! core-shell structures is possible
(surface enrichment of one
component)
Ozin, Arsenault, Cademartiri – „Chemistry at the Nanoscale“
Nanochemistry – Chemistry at the Nanoscale?
Polymers 2018, 10, 91 (part of a special issue on "Polymers and Block Copolymers at Interfaces and Surfaces")
Nanoparticle Surface (Modification) – So what?
Self-assembly strategies
Light Scattering – a comprehensive reminder
a. Linear light matter interaction
ii. Classical description of elastic light scattering
! Note: scattering can yield wrong results e.g. when measuring the absorbance
of a sample by inducing fake peaks.
Categorization of Scattering
Tommy Markstein
Rayleigh scattering for particle sizes 1 𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 < 𝑑𝑑 < 0.1 𝜆𝜆 ≈ 60 𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛,
Rayleigh-Debye scattering for 60 𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 < 𝑑𝑑 < 200 𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛,
Mie scattering for 200 𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 < 𝑑𝑑 < 10,000 𝜆𝜆 ≈ 6 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚,
Fraunhofer scattering for 6 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 < 𝑑𝑑.
In analogy to the Lambert-Beer law, the total scattering power of a sample
can be described as follows:
1 𝐼𝐼0
�ln = 𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝑁𝑁 � 𝜎𝜎𝑆𝑆 N particle density.
𝑥𝑥 𝐼𝐼
Thus the dipole acts as a secondary radiation source, it is the starting point of
scattered light of intensity Is (radiated power per area).
For isotropic molecules oscillating dipole oscillates vertically in the direction of
z-axis
! Note: this is the molecular analogue to the macroscopic Hertzian dipole.
𝜔𝜔3 𝑛𝑛 1 1
𝐸𝐸 = � 𝑛𝑛 × 𝑝𝑝⃗ × + 3𝑛𝑛 𝑛𝑛 � 𝑝𝑝⃗ − 𝑝𝑝⃗ � 3 − 2 � 𝑒𝑒 −𝑖𝑖 𝜌𝜌−𝜔𝜔𝑡𝑡
4𝜋𝜋𝜋𝜋𝑐𝑐 3 𝜌𝜌 𝜌𝜌 𝜌𝜌
2𝜋𝜋𝜋𝜋
𝜌𝜌 ≡
𝜔𝜔
Rayleigh scattering
The electromagnetic field E(t) induces a time-dependent induced dipole
moment μind(t) at the oscillating dipole (core electron model), excites the dipole
to forced oscillations.
𝜔𝜔3 𝑛𝑛 1 1
𝐸𝐸 = � 𝑛𝑛 × 𝑝𝑝⃗ × + 3𝑛𝑛 𝑛𝑛 � 𝑝𝑝⃗ − 𝑝𝑝⃗ � 3 − 2 � 𝑒𝑒 −𝑖𝑖 𝜌𝜌−𝜔𝜔𝑡𝑡
4𝜋𝜋𝜋𝜋𝑐𝑐 3 𝜌𝜌 𝜌𝜌 𝜌𝜌
𝜔𝜔3 𝑛𝑛
𝐸𝐸 = � 𝑛𝑛 × 𝑝𝑝⃗ × � 𝑒𝑒 −𝑖𝑖 𝜌𝜌−𝜔𝜔𝑡𝑡
4𝜋𝜋𝜋𝜋𝑐𝑐 3 𝜌𝜌
𝜔𝜔4 � 𝑝𝑝⃗ 2
𝐼𝐼 𝜃𝜃 = 2 3 � 1 − 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 2 𝜃𝜃
32𝜋𝜋 𝜀𝜀𝑐𝑐
Von Averse, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=15794244
Rayleigh scattering
The electromagnetic field E(t) induces a time-dependent induced dipole
moment μind(t) at the oscillating dipole (core electron model), excites the dipole
to forced oscillations.
𝜔𝜔3 𝑛𝑛 1 1
𝐸𝐸 = � 𝑛𝑛 × 𝑝𝑝⃗ × + 3𝑛𝑛 𝑛𝑛 � 𝑝𝑝⃗ − 𝑝𝑝⃗ � 3 − 2 � 𝑒𝑒 −𝑖𝑖 𝜌𝜌−𝜔𝜔𝑡𝑡
4𝜋𝜋𝜋𝜋𝑐𝑐 3 𝜌𝜌 𝜌𝜌 𝜌𝜌
𝜔𝜔2 𝑛𝑛
𝐸𝐸 = � 𝑛𝑛 × 𝑝𝑝⃗ × � 𝑒𝑒 −𝑖𝑖 𝜌𝜌−𝜔𝜔𝑡𝑡
4𝜋𝜋𝜋𝜋𝑐𝑐 3 𝜌𝜌
𝜔𝜔4 � 𝑝𝑝⃗ 2
𝐼𝐼 𝜃𝜃 = 2 3 � 1 − 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 2 𝜃𝜃
32𝜋𝜋 𝜀𝜀𝑐𝑐
Rayleigh scattering
For scattering centres that are significantly smaller than the wavelength of the light:
(Rayleigh equation)
Distribution of Rayleigh scattered radiation when
irradiated with monochromatic, vertically polarized
light is independent of azimuth angle Θ.
(Rayleigh equation)
𝜔𝜔2 𝑛𝑛
𝐸𝐸 = � 𝑛𝑛 × 𝑝𝑝⃗ × � 𝑒𝑒 −𝑖𝑖 𝜌𝜌−𝜔𝜔𝑡𝑡
4𝜋𝜋𝜋𝜋𝑐𝑐 3 𝜌𝜌
𝜔𝜔4 � 𝑝𝑝⃗ 2
𝐼𝐼 𝜃𝜃 = 2 3
� 1 − 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 2 𝜃𝜃
32𝜋𝜋 𝜀𝜀𝑐𝑐
(Rayleigh equation)
𝐼𝐼𝑆𝑆 16𝜋𝜋 2 𝛼𝛼 2
= 2 4 � 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠2 Φ Clausius-Mosotti 𝑛𝑛2 − 1 = 4𝜋𝜋𝜋𝜋𝜋𝜋
𝐼𝐼0 𝑟𝑟 � 𝜆𝜆
𝑛𝑛 + 𝑛𝑛𝐿𝐿 𝑛𝑛 − 𝑛𝑛𝐿𝐿 𝐶𝐶
𝐶𝐶 =𝑔𝑔 � 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐−3 𝛼𝛼 = � �
4𝜋𝜋 𝐶𝐶 𝑁𝑁
2
2𝑛𝑛𝐿𝐿 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑀𝑀
16𝜋𝜋 2
𝐼𝐼𝑆𝑆 4𝜋𝜋 � 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 � 𝐴𝐴 2𝑛𝑛𝐿𝐿 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑀𝑀
= � 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠2 Φ 𝛼𝛼 = � �
𝐼𝐼0 𝑟𝑟 2 � 𝜆𝜆4 4𝜋𝜋 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝐴𝐴
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 2
𝐼𝐼𝑆𝑆 4𝑛𝑛𝐿𝐿2 � � 𝑀𝑀2
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 2Φ
= � 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠
𝐼𝐼0 𝑟𝑟 2 � 𝜆𝜆4 � 𝐴𝐴2
Determination of molecular masses from Rayleigh scattering
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 2
𝐼𝐼𝑆𝑆 4𝑛𝑛𝐿𝐿2� � 𝑀𝑀2
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
= 2 4 2
� 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠2 Φ
𝐼𝐼0 𝑟𝑟 � 𝜆𝜆 � 𝐴𝐴
Scattering by larger particles
Collimated monochromatic and coherent light (laser) interacts with an extended
macomolecule
Two scattering centers A and B (e.g. individual atoms of the molecule) are
excited out of phase and radiated out of phase accordingly-
For an observer at the angle θ both scattering centers are differently far away
(δ), so that depending on scattering particles, refractive indices and observation
direction constructive or destructive interference occurs
Introduction of a so-called form factor that takes these interference effects into
account:
Scattering by larger particles
With increasing particle size, the scattering intensity Is increases strongly and
at the same time the distribution of the scattered light changes: a pronounced
forward scattering occurs.
! Note: the relative size of λ and the size of the scattering particle is important
→ when using X-ray light (Cu Kα-line at 1.45 Å) even molecules are big
→ scattering mainly in forward direction with only small deviations from the
axis of the incident beam
→ basis for small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)
Scattering by larger particles
Scattering intensity and particle size
To this end, spherical particles with a typical refractive index of nT = 1,59 were
suspended in water with nM = 1,33 and irradiated with 633 nm laser light
The scattering was observed under an azimuth angle of θ =5 and 90°
Static light scattering
Scattering intensity depends on:
the molecular weight of the particles
the concentration of the particles
the size of the particles
the refractive index of the pure solvent
the refractive index of the suspended
molecules
interaction forces between particles
Oder auch:
„Chemie der Dinge, die komplexer sind als die konstituierenden Moleküle selbst“
2. Die Art der Bindung muss selektiv sein – Gast hat eine zum Wirt komplementäre
Größe oder Form = „molecular recognition“; Emil Fischer (1894)
3. Die Ausbildung der Bindung ist das Resultat von attraktiven / anziehenden Wechsel-
wirkungen zwischen Wirt und Gast; Alfred Werner (1893)
Drei anfänglich völlig unabhängige Konzepte wurden mit der Zeit unter dem Deckmantel
der Supramolekularen Chemie zusammengeführt.
42
What is supramolecular chemistry?
Supramolecular chemistry
Specific characteristics:
+ • Function properties
• Recognition
• Catalysis
• Transport
Guest Host
Supramolecule (complex)
degree of order, interactions between subunits,
symmetry of packing, intermolecular interactions
Synthetic receptor, binding site or host molecule: one of the binding partners, typically the
larger one
Kinetic selectivity: related to the rate constants of aggregate formation (one guest
molecule is simply bound faster (not necessary with higher binding affinity))
45
What can we do with supramolecular chemistry?
1000 100 10 1
[kJ/mol]
C C C C C C I I
839 614 348 151
Ion - ion (350 - 100)
π - π stacking (50 - 1)
(80 - 4)
Cation - π
48
Ion-ion interactions
[Tris(diazabicyclooctan)]3+
+
[Fe(CN)6]3-
49
Ion-dipole interactions
OH2 O N N
H 2O OH2
O O 2+
N Ru N
Na Na
O O N N
H 2O OH2 O
OH2
+ crown ether complex
Na [Ru(bpy)3]
2+
50
Dipole-dipole interactions
-
δ δ+ R
- O C
R δ R R R
R
C δ
+
C O C O
R
O R δ+ δ-
type I type II
51
Hydrogen bonding
1) W. Nernst, Z. Phys. Chem. 1892, 8, 110. 2) W. M. Latimer et al., J. Am . Chem. Soc. 1920, 42, 1419-1433. 3) M. L. Huggins, Chemtech, 1980, 422-
429. 4) D. Quane, Bull. Hist. Chem. 1990, 7, 3-13. 5) E. D. Glowacki et al., J. Mater. Chem. B, 2013, 3742-3753.
53
Hydrogen bonding III
A A a) Linear
D H A D H D H
a b c A b) Bent
c) Donating bifurcated
A
A H d) Accepting bifurcated
H
D D H A D A
A e) Trifurcated
H A H
e
A f) Three centre bifurcated
d f
Jorgensen model
• Differences in hydrogen bond stability can be largely attributed to attractive and
repulsive secondary interactions
• Stabilization arises from electrostatic attraction between positively and negatively
polarized atoms in adjacent H-bonds
• Destabilization arises from electrostatic repulsion between two positively or
negatively polarized atoms
D donor
D D D A D D A D A A acceptor
---- primary attractive interaction
A A A D A A D A D ---- secondary attractive interaction
---- secondary repulsive interaction
• The first theoretical models suggested that H-bonding exclusively involves an electrostatic
interaction between the partially positive hydrogen atom of the donor and the lone pair of the
acceptor
• It is generally accepted that H-bonding can be described neither by electrostatic theory nor
by weak covalent bonding alone
• The hydrogen bond can separated in five individual contributions
(Morokuma formalism ∆E = ∆ECOU + ∆EEX + ∆EPOL + ∆ECHT + ∆EDIS)
• Aromatic rings where one is relatively electron rich and one is electron poor
• Bond strength 1-50 kJ/mol
• Two general types: face-to-face and edge-to-face → direct overlap is repulsive!!!
• Face-to-face → graphite or DNA;
• Edge-to-face → herringbone packing of benzene in the solid state
Face-to-face Edge-to-face
58
Van der Waals forces
The term ‘hydrophobic effect’ refers to the poor solubility of nonpolar substances in
water compared to organic solvents or to polar substances
61
Hydrophobic effects II
After mixing
• Increase of the surface between
hydrophobic molecules and water
• Loss of conformational entropy
because of strong directional forces
between water molecules ∆S ↓ → ∆G ↑
After Unmixing
• In bulk solution, a water molecule can
rotate and still maintain hydrogen
bonding interactions ∆S ↑, ∆ H ↓ → ∆G ↓
62
…and back to Nanochemistry
Credits to:
66
What is „Soft matter“?
67
Everything flows?
Rheology is the study of deformation and flow
relatively brittle
Logo of the
Society of Rheology
68
Examples for „Soft matter“?
https://universe-review.ca/I15-81-softmatter.jpg 69
Characteristics of „Soft matter“?
1) Length scales:
- Structures of ≈10-1000 nm determine the (macroscopic) properties
2) Time scales: processes from 10-12 - 103 s
- Dynamics processes over a wide time scales 10-12 - 103 s
- Very slow processes in non-equilibrium configurations (possible)
3) Weak interactions
- Interactions between molecules and molecular structures ≈ kT
4) Self assembly
- Hierarchical arrangement of structures
- Competition between interaction energy and entropy
70
Origin of surface tension
71
Interfacial energy
An interfacial energy Γ is associated with the interface between two
phases (units of Jm-2) (also called interfacial tension: Nm-1)
Γ cos θ = F
d
http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/602/616516/Chapter_10.html
72
Types of „Soft Matter“ - Colloids
• Colloid features sub-mm particles (but not single molecules) of one phase dispersed
in a continuous phase
• The size scale of the dispersed phase is between 1 nm and 1 mm
• The dispersed phase and the continuous phase can consist of either a solid (S), liquid
(L), or gas (G)…
73
…a quick note on beer froth…
2002: Arnd Leike erhält den Ig-Nobelpreis für seine Arbeiten zur
Theorie, dass der Bierschaumzerfall einem exponentiellen Gesetz
folgt. Allerdings ist uns denke ich auch allen klar, dass hier ein Viel-
Faktoren-Problem beschrieben wurde – recht vereinfacht. Das ist
schwer reproduzierbar, hängt auch sehr von der Güte Ihrer
Spülmaschine ab…
Nun, die Forschung von Herrn Leike hat weitere Studien inspiriert,
so zB auch an der Universität Würzburg –hier war die Quintessenz,
dass:
- „…die Beschreibung des Bierschaumzerfalls als Analogon zum
radioaktiven Zerfall problematisch erscheint.“
- „…Bierschaumzerfall ein mögliches Thema für
Seminararbeiten oder Jugend forscht darstellt…“
76
Types of „Soft Matter“ - surfactants
Surfactants:
- Amphiphilic molecules of low molecular weight
- Tendency to adsorb („go to“) at interfaces (interfacially active)
- …never really comfortable in a single solvent…
Aggregation (minimization of interfacial energy)
Micro-phase segregation, formation of thermodynamically stable aggregates
Ionic / non-ionic
78
Types of „Soft Matter“ – surfactants / examples II
79
Types of „Soft Matter“ – surfactants, micellar morphologies
80
Types of „Soft Matter“ – surfactants, micellar morphologies
http://www.dataphysics.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Understanding/Schematic_CMCEN.png
82
Types of „Soft Matter“ – surfactants – critical micellization concentration
Many physical properties of such a solution exhibit drastic / abrupt changes upon
crossing the cmc…
Conductivity
Osmotic
pressure
Turbidity
Surface tension
https://csc-iiith.vlabs.ac.in/exp14/fig1.jpg 83
Types of „Soft Matter“ – surfactants – critical micellization concentration
84
Characteristics of „Soft matter“ – (1) length scales
85
Characteristics of „Soft matter“ – (1) length scales
Spider silk as an example of hierarchical organization
- Thermal fluctuations
- Brownian motion
- Possibility to equilibrate (in terms of structure, morphology, …)
- Determination of sizes (polymers, colloids)
light scattering
D diffusion coefficient
k Boltzmann
T temperature
R radius
Η viscosity
Examples:
- Molecules in liquids: 10-9 m2/s
- Polymers in liquids: 10-18 m2/s (or higher, depending on molar mass)
- Micelles in water: 10-11 m2/s (radius of approx. 10 nm)
87
Characteristics of „Soft matter“ – (3) weak interactions
https://sites.psu.edu/siowfa15/2015/11/29/ho
w-is-the-gecko-changing-the-world/
http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/366/1870/1575
88
Characteristics of „Soft matter“ – (4) self-assembly processes!
Adenin - Thymin
Paul W. K. Rothemund
Nature, 2006, 440, 297-303
Caltech Institute
Guanin - Cytosin
91
Characteristics of „Soft matter“ – DNA Origami – underlying principles
92
Nature, 2006, 440, 297-303
Characteristics of „Soft matter“ – DNA Origami – underlying principles
93
Nature, 2006, 440, 297-303
Characteristics of „Soft matter“ – DNA Origami – underlying principles
Assembly of rigid
building blocks
„Colloidosomes“
Colloidal
particles
Liquid
(<1 µm)
B
Liquid A
100 µm
0h 6h 22 h
5 µm
96
Characteristics of „Soft matter“ – (4) self-assembly processes!
If free energy decreases (ΔF < 0), then the process is spontaneous.
∆F = ∆U - T∆S
Internal Energy (U) decrease is Entropy (S) increase is favourable
favourable
97
So, finally: what is important about self-assembly?
98
Self-Assembly – a General Concept
1) Building block shape and symmetry influences self-assembly, e.g. two nanorods can
either „contact“ at the tip or at the longitudinal side, this is determined by type and
strength of the interactions
3) Shape and symmetry are also important if several steps are involved, i.e. if
hierarchical structures are formed determining type and connectivity
Microstructure
X
R R R R R R R R R
X X
R R R R
R R R R R
X X X X X X X X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
Material properties
© Axel H. E. Müller, Mainz
Site-specific Incorporation of Metal Nanoparticles within Soft Matter
Au
Au
Organic electronics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_membrane
111
Motivation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_membrane
112
Motivation – Transfer from Nature to Device
lipophile hydrophile
Layer
113
Motivation – Transfer from Nature to Device
lipophile hydrophile
Layer
114
Introduction – Langmuir Blodgett
115
Langmuir-Blodgett trough
Alternate Trog:
• Standardisiert
• Charakterisierung
vorhanden
Rolle-zu-Rolle Trog:
• Großflächig
• Neu
• Vorcharakterisierung
notwendig
Langmuir-Blodgett trough
Wilhelmy balance
F = σ � 𝐿𝐿 � cos 𝜃𝜃
• gaseous phase is formed at large molecular areas, i.e. available area per molecule >> molecular size
• Total area can be extended (infenitely) w/o having a phase transition
Π(A)-Isotherme
• at low surface excess, surface tension decreases linearly with the concentration,
i.e. 𝛾𝛾 = 𝛾𝛾0 − 𝑏𝑏 � 𝑐𝑐, with 𝑏𝑏 depending on solvent and amphiphile;
𝑎𝑎 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕
• with Gibbs isotherme, Γ = − 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 � 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕 (a is activity) this yields:
𝑐𝑐 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏
Γ = − 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 � 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 = 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅
• with film pressure 𝜋𝜋 ≡ 𝛾𝛾0 − 𝛾𝛾 = 𝛾𝛾0 − 𝛾𝛾0 − 𝑏𝑏 � 𝑐𝑐 = 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏
𝜋𝜋
→ Γ = 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 ⇒ 𝜋𝜋 = Γ � 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅
𝑁𝑁 1
• with Γ = = ⇒ 𝜋𝜋𝜎𝜎𝐴𝐴 = 𝑘𝑘𝐵𝐵 𝑇𝑇
𝐴𝐴 𝜎𝜎𝐴𝐴
𝑉𝑉
compare to 𝑝𝑝 𝑁𝑁 = 𝑘𝑘𝐵𝐵 𝑇𝑇, i.e. ideal gas!
• gaseous phase is formed at large molecular areas, i.e. available area per molecule >> molecular size
• Total area can be extended (infenitely) w/o having a phase transition
Π(A)-Isotherme
• at low surface excess, surface tension decreases linearly with the concentration,
i.e. 𝛾𝛾 = 𝛾𝛾0 − 𝑏𝑏 � 𝑐𝑐, with 𝑏𝑏 depending on solvent and amphiphile;
𝑎𝑎 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕
• with Gibbs isotherme, Γ = − 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 � 𝜕𝜕𝜕𝜕 (a is activity) this yields:
𝑐𝑐 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏
Γ = − 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 � 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 = 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅
• with film pressure 𝜋𝜋 ≡ 𝛾𝛾0 − 𝛾𝛾 = 𝛾𝛾0 − 𝛾𝛾0 − 𝑏𝑏 � 𝑐𝑐 = 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏
𝜋𝜋
→ Γ = 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 ⇒ 𝜋𝜋 = Γ � 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅
𝑁𝑁 1
• with Γ = = ⇒ 𝜋𝜋𝜎𝜎𝐴𝐴 = 𝑘𝑘𝐵𝐵 𝑇𝑇
𝐴𝐴 𝜎𝜎𝐴𝐴
𝑎𝑎
more realistically: 𝜋𝜋 + 𝜎𝜎2 � 𝜎𝜎𝐴𝐴 − 𝜎𝜎0 = 𝑘𝑘𝐵𝐵 𝑇𝑇
𝐴𝐴
• gaseous phase is formed at large molecular areas, i.e. available area per molecule >> molecular size
• Total area can be extended (infenitely) w/o having a phase transition
Π(A)-Isotherme
• compressing gaseous phase leads to first order phase transition → liquid phase
• characterized by significant lateral interactions of the molecules
Π(A)-Isotherme
• in solid phase the headgroups are largely dehydrated, thus increasing the order of the headgroup
layer
• pressure-area isotherms are linear
• extrapolation to zero-film pressure leads to an area per molecule corresponding to the actual
molecular cross-section
Π(A)-Isotherme
Π(A)-Isotherme as a function of temperature
• before a single liquid phase was discussed
• actually, in most cases, a liquid expanded
and a liquid condensed phase is observed
• these two phases are separated in the
Π 𝐴𝐴 diagram via a plateau at the
coexistence pressure 𝜋𝜋𝐶𝐶
• 𝜋𝜋𝐶𝐶 depends on the temperature
→ see isotherme of van-der-Waals gas
Stability of Molecular Layers
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Solids/hyst.html
Stability of Domain Structures in Magnets
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Solids/hyst.html
Stability of Molecular Layers
Layer
132
Colored Soaps
Properties of dyes and the resultant monolayers are determined by
• molecular geometry
• amphiphilicity (polar vs. unpolar parts of the molecules)
determines stability of the anchoring
• high molecular extinction coefficient (to yield color)
HO
O S O
N N O N O CH2
H3 C
H2 C
CH3
O N N O
N N
NH HO S Cl Fe
(III) S OH
(III)
N Cl Fe
O N N O
N N
N
H3 C CH3
O N O
O
O
O
+
N
O- O HO O HO
O O S O
O
O
OH
O
O
Water or Substrate
O
O
Quelle: Volkswagen, Wikipedia, Edding, Decathlon Fotolia
Colored Soaps
Properties of dyes and the resultant monolayers are determined by
• molecular geometry
• amphiphilicity (polar vs. unpolar parts of the molecules)
determines stability of the anchoring
• high molecular extinction coefficient (to yield color)
• high photostability (no bleaching)
• low costs for applications and device fabriation
O N O O N O O N O O N O O N O
O N O O N O O N O O N O O N O
O
Experimental Methods to Characterize Molecular Films
How to measure absorption of molecularly thin films? – Classically (e.g. in solution) one would:
• measure the transmission T
• calculate absorbance A from transmission (assuming e.g. negligible scattering or using an
Ulbricht sphere)
Reminder regarding the Lambert-Beer law:
! the presence of a fluorophore in the molecular layer might disturb the native structure of the
molecular layer that is under study
• Brewster angle microscopy solves this problem
(iii) Optical Microscopy
• light shined at a liquid surface is partially
reflected
• the intensity of the reflected light depends on
the angle of incidence
⇒ observing water surface at 53° with polarized light yields a dark image
⇒ areas in which the monolayer is formed have different index and hence a slightly different
Brewster angle
⇒ Tthey appear bright in the microscope.
(iv) Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy
• Infrared absorption spectra of thin molecular films can be recorded either by
a. ATR-IR, here the film needs to be transferred to a substrate
b. IRRAS, in which an s-polarized IR beam is directly reflected from the interface
SiO2, Au, …
Synthetic access to Nanomaterials
Solution techniques:
- Coprecipitation
- Hydrothermal processing
- Solvothermal methods
- Sol-gel chemistry
E. Von Ebelmen, Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, 1846, 57, 319f
„Gel“: gel state is defined as a non-fluid 3D-network that extends through a fluid
phase; Flory in 1974 defined 4 gel states: ordered lamellar gels (e.g. clays), covalent
networks, physical networks, disordered particulate gels;
http://soft-matter.seas.harvard.edu/index.php/Ostwald_ripening
Short Excursus – Ostwald Ripening
This thermodynamically-driven spontaneous process occurs because larger particles are more
energetically favored than smaller particles. This stems from the fact that molecules on the surface of
a particle are energetically less stable than the ones in the interior.
When Ostwald ripening does occur, initially, the droplet size distribution is dictated by homogenization
conditions, but with time, a steady-state particle distribution is reached. This distribution evolves in
time by increasing in mean size, but keeps a time-independent form. At steady state there is a critical
radius, above which droplets grow and below which droplets shrink. Assuming this radius is
approximately equal to the mean radius, diffusion in the external medium is limiting factor,
inhomogeneities in diffusion are negligible, and that the distances between particles are much larger
than particle size, Lifshitz and Slezov (Kabalnov, 1993) derived a time-evolution equation of the mean
radius.
http://soft-matter.seas.harvard.edu/index.php/Ostwald_ripening
Short Excursus – Ostwald Ripening - Examples
Source: Wikipedia
Short Excursus – Ostwald Ripening - Examples
Ice Cream:
After warming up, during recrystallization when temperatures decrease again, Ostwald
ripening causes the average crystal size to grow, giving ice-cream an unpleasant texture after
melting and refreezing.
http://soft-matter.seas.harvard.edu/index.php/Ostwald_ripening
Short Excursus – Ostwald Ripening - Examples
Reasons? – Polymer coils are different from hard / non-porous spheres, aggregation, …
Au Nanoparticles
Why are Au Nanoparticles of Interest?
One of the most important properties of gold nanoparticles, especially for their application in
chemical and biological sensing experiments, is their localized surface plasmon resonance
(LSPR). Thereby, light interacts with particles which are much smaller than the incident
wavelength. This leads to a plasmon that oscillates locally around the nanoparticle with a
frequency known as the LSPR. Overall, this is the fundamental effect for surface enhanced
Raman spectroscopy (SERS), on one hand and the UV/Vis absorption of nanoparticle
dispersions on the other. The latter can be correlated to the average particle size. If the size
of the particles remains constant, the position of the UV/Vis absorption band can be used to
characterize the local dielectric environment of the nanoparticles…
(Diploma thesis, C. Hörenz)
https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/technical-documents/articles/materials-science/nanomaterials/gold-nanoparticles.html
Example – Formation of Au Nanoparticles
http://mrsec.wisc.edu/Edetc/nanolab/gold/index.html
J. Chem. Ed. 2004, 81, 544A.
Example – Formation of Au Nanoparticles
http://mrsec.wisc.edu/Edetc/nanolab/gold/index.html
J. Chem. Ed. 2004, 81, 544A.
Example – Formation of Au Nanoparticles
Growth of nanoparticles:
Isotropic Spherical Surface capped
Growth with citrate anions
Nanoparticles
Seed
Adding surfactant to growth solution
Anisotropic Nanorods caps certain crystal faces and promotes
Growth growth only in selected directions.
http://mrsec.wisc.edu/Edetc/nanolab/gold/index.html
J. Chem. Ed. 2004, 81, 544A.
Turkevich Method – more complex than anticipated?
Turkevich Method – more complex than anticipated?
Brust-Schiffrin – Two-Phase Synthesis of Au NP
> 6.000 citations !
MUA: 11-mercapto-1-undecanoic
acid
MUDA: 11-
mercaptoundecanamide
NaBH4
+
SH
SH
Excess
Excess
SH - Toxicity?
- Particle stability?
- Signal loss?
- „Building Block“
AIM: Prevent ligand exchange upon the addition of another Ligand
Strategy: Crosslinkable Ligands for Au NP
Crosslinking Approaches
PEO-b-PAGE-SH:
= = =
PEO-b-PFGE-SH:
= = =
Crosslinking
UV/Vis:
Crosslinking
Proof of Crosslinking
Au@PEO45-b-PFGE7-SH Au@PEO-b-PFGEXL
Au@PEO54-b-PAGE7-SH Au@PEO-b-PAGEXL
Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
Why Magnetic Nanoparticles?
challenges
• secondary aggregation
Why nanoparticles? • circulation times
• immune response
unique properties due to large surface/volume ratio • cell interaction/uptake
• increased chemical reactivity • clearance from organism
• decreased influence of mass forces compared to van der influenced by protein corona
Waals forces or electrostatic interaction and surface chemistry
→ stable dispersions possible
• material-specific properties, e.g. superparamagnetism
Biomedical applications
• contrast agents
• drug delivery
• hyperthermia
Important parameters of
hysteresis loop:
Saturation magnetisation, Ms
Remanence, Mr
Rel. Remanence, Mr/Ms
Coercivity, Hc
Loop area (losses)
200
175
superparamagnetic: < 10 nm
150
single domains: 10 to 65 nm
125
coherent rotation of magnetisation
HC [Oe]
100
pseudo single domains:
75 65 to 75 nm
50 multi domains: > 75 nm
25 wall displacement
0
20 40 60 80 100
d [nm]
Aim:
A liquid rocket fuel that could be drawn
toward a pump inlet in a weightless
environment by applying a magnetic field
Preparation:
Grinding of 30 µm particles down to 100
nm in presence of a propellant (heptane)
and a dispersing surfactant (oleic acid)
for several days.
Steve Papell invented
ferrofluid for NASA in 1963
Coating: • Stabilization
• Biocompatibility
• Functionalization
• Biomineralization
• Alkaline Co-Precipitation
• Modified co-precipitation
• Glass crystallization
• Laser evaporation
• Oxidative alkaline hydrolysis of Fe2+ solution
• Polyols synthesis
• Thermal decomposition
• Hydrothermal reactions
• Microemulsion synthesis
• Sol-gel method Variation of:
• …. • Size
• Size distribution
• Shape
Problem with many methods: broad size distribution • Magnetic phase
Fractionation necessary
resulting mean
particle size:
20 … 100 nm
• Particle size: ≤ 10 nm
• High yield of preparation
• Broad size distribution
Exhaust gas
Filter
Focused laser
Evaporation chamber
beam
Refill unit
Coating unit
Coating additive
Rotable ring-shaped
heater Carrier gas
channel
resulting mean
particle size:
20 … 100 nm
50 nm
[Kurland et al. 2007]
Structural characterisation:
• X-ray diffractometry (XRD)
• Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
• Dynamic light scattering (DLS, also PCS)
Magnetic characterisation:
• Vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM)
• Magnetic field calorimetry (SAR)
• AC-Susceptometry
X-Ray Diffractometry
200
XRD
150
counts
100
Identification of:
• elements 50
• compounds
• foreign phases 0
20 30 40 50 60
2θ [°]
• phase indentification
MNP, 100 nm
50 MNP, 10 nm γ-Fe2O3 / Fe3O4
40 D ↓ ⇒ γ-Fe2O3
intensity [counts/s]
Maghemite
γ-Fe2O3
30
Magnetite
Fe3O4
• single crystal size:
20
10