Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Specialize Crime Investigation. (Yu)
Specialize Crime Investigation. (Yu)
Module 1
1. False
2. False.
3. False
4. False
5. False
6. True
7. True
8. True
9. True
10. True
ASSESSMENT 1.1
5. What are the cases of specified under the Doctrine of Citizen Arrest?
In most cases, an arrest consist of other actually seizing or touching a person’s body in an effort to
detain them. You must find a person either in the act of committing a crime, or escaping from and
freshly pursued by persons who have lawful authority to arrest that person, in order to lawfully make a
citizen arrest. The case specified under doctrine of citizens arrest are like civil lawsuit, assault, theft and
many more . A person maybe placed under citizens are it if he is in breach of the peace , which is usually
a misdemeanor charges.
ASSESSMENT 1.2.
The search warrant is valid only and should execute within Ten (10) days from receipt.
Object that are in plain view such as a bag of drugs in the backseat of a car do not
require a warrant or probable cause to be seized and admitted as evidence.
5. What is the Right of every person against unreasonable search and seizures?
The right of people to be secured in their persons, house, papers and effects against
unreasonable search and seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose shall be
inviolable, and no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall be issue except upon
probable cause to be determined personally by the judge after examination under oath
or affirmation of the complainant and the witness he may produce, and particularly
describing the place to be search and the person or things to be seized.( Section 2,
article III, 1986 constitution)
ASSESSMENT 1.3
"On September 10, 1979, an information for murder was filed against accused Liwag.
On September 23, 1979, however, Accused Liwag made a confession before the S ittation Commander
of Iriga City, claiming that it was appellant Bolaños who had ordered the killing of Lee (TSN, August 13,
1981, pp. 5-8). On the same date, a sworn statement to that effect was executed (Exhibit "R," Original
Records, p. 15-16) by accused Liwag.
AFFIRMATION
I HEREBY AFFIRMED that I, Josephine Ramos was informed and fully explained of all
my rights enshrined under the 1987 Philippine Constitution, which I understand as
follows:
1. That I have the right to remain silent and any information that I will give can be used
as evidence against me in any court of the Philippines;
2. That I have a right to have a counsel preferable of my own choice, if I cannot afford
the services of the counsel, the Government of the Philippines will give one to assist me;
3. That I have the right to know why I am at the MacArthur MPS and
4. That I have the right to be informed of all my Constitutional rights enumerated above.
Affiant
At this juncture Mark Ramos and said counsels conferred with each other and after a
short while, affiant agreed to accept the services of said counsel. Atty. Ching Chong.
Likewise expressed their conformity and agreed to serve as the affiant’s counsels to
advise and assist him in the execution of his affidavit. Atty. Ching Chong informed
affiant about the possible consequences upon him of said affidavit and affiant still
expressed his desire to execute the same. Hence, the following:
1. Q: After you are fully informed and explained of all your rights under the 1987
Philippine Constitution in relation to your voluntary confession, are you willing to freely
and voluntarily give your statements truthfully and that all your statements are true and
nothing but the truth only?
A: Yes. All will be true statements.
2. Q: What is your name, age, address and other personal circumstances?
A: I am Juan Dela Cruz, 29 years old
6. Q: What are the reasons why you are voluntarily came to this Office?
A: Because I want to change my life and I want to freely and voluntarily give information
relative to the illegal activities of my previous drug syndicate.
7. Q: If that is the case, can you tell us all your knowledge/information about the illegal
drugs activities of your gang?
A: Yes sir. I am previously a member of the wa-wa drug syndicate We are 6 members
in the gang. Our leader is Abdul Haseem, an AWOL PNP Officer. The other gang
members are Jack, Sammy, Ramil, Jun-Jun, Zorro. Every one of us carry caliber .45
pistols for our protection. We have also two long firearms (AK-47rifles) inside our service
Closed Van. Our gang controlled the marketing of illegal drugs known as “SHABU” all
over Dulag, Leyte. We usually peddled 5-10 kilograms of “SHABU” in a week.
8. Q: What is your function in the gang?
A: I’m the one looking for pushers in the street level.
9. Q: If you look for pushers, what did you do?
A: I will set a meeting and talk with them on the drug deal.
10.Q: What happened if they agreed with the drug deal with your gang?
A: They will become our pusher member and they have the privilege to use “SHABU” in
our den for free, provided they will sell our item “SHABU” and remit the proceeds to the
gang every day. 11.Q: How many grams do you give to your pushers every day?
A: I give each of them 50 grams.
12.Q: How much per gram of your “SHABU”?
A: We give only 200.00 per gram to our pushers.
13.Q: You said that your gang has a drug den, where it is located and who manage it?
A: It is located at Brgy. Sungi Dulag, Leyte. Our leader Abdul Haseem manage our
drug den.
---------END OF STATEMENT----------
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 20 day of April 2016 at MacArthyr MPS
Further, I certify that I personally examined the herein affiant that he voluntarily executed
and fully understood his statements.
Dominador Matalaw
Administering
Officer
Confession count as proof if when they are made voluntarily and not a false confession.
The criminal confession would make them feel better because the got everything off
their chests and mind. There's no reason to think about being arrested since the police
now know all about the situation.
The confession count as evidence if the judge will assess any concern about the
voluntariness of the confession. If the judge decides that the confession was made
voluntarily, the confession will be accepted as evidence.
8. Understand the rules and legal requirements of extra - judicial confession and extra - judicial
admission.
A voluntary confession is a confession that is given out of a suspect's own free will, and
has not been obtained by force, coercion, or intimidation. Under to the 14th
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, due process requires that all confessions obtained
by the police must be voluntary while involuntary confession an admission, especially by
an individual who has been accused of a crime, that is not freely offered but rather is
precipitated by a threat, fear, torture, or a promise.
9.Know the difference between judicial and extra- judicial admission and confession.
Judicial power rests with the Supreme Court and the lower courts, as established by law
(Art. VIII, sec. 1 of the 1987 Constitution). Its duty is to settle actual controversies
involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable (Art. VIII Sec. 1 (2)). while
extrajudicial admission made by the child would be insufficient to conclude that the
child committed the acts alleged in the petition. However it would be sufficient if it is
corroborated by other evidence, and a confession must be corroborated by some other
proof of the corpus delict, or else it is insufficient to warrant a conviction. Judicial it
involves judgement, whether in the courts of justice or the administration of justice
while extra-judicial an action or situation happens outside or beyond the jurisdiction or
usual procedure of a court.
MODULE POST-TEST
1. D
2. A
3. C
4. A
5. D
6. A
7. B
8. D
9. B
10. D
11. D
12. D
13. B
14. D
15. A
16. A
17. D
18. B
19. B
20. D
21. A
22. C
23. B
24. C
25. D
26. C
27. B
28. A
29. B
30. D
1. True
2. True
3. True
4. False
5. True
6. True
7. True
8. True
9. False
10. True
MODULE 2
PRE-TEST
1. False
2. True
3. False
4. True
5. False
Lesson 2.1
Learning Activity
1. Write the various strategies in successful police raid operation.
-A successful police raid operation will be efficient with the coordination of each participant
and a team leader. Before doing a raid, there are some factors or strategies that need to be
prepared and followed. First on the line would probably know the situation of the building
or terrain must be estimated and subject to close study. Detailed planning is based on
intelligence information. The plan must be simple, the more complicated the plan where the
more possible for non-success operation. Aggressive training and accurate planning before
the operation in connection to the elements of surprise must always be considered.
Considering, the strength of firearms or equipment must be superior to the target. Smaller
raiding authorities have more strategic advantages over more massive formations. All
equipment to be used must be adequately checked. Whereas, each member of the raiding
team should be given a specific assignment and operational tasks. The purpose or mission of
operation should be briefed to all members of the raiding team. Lastly, signal for
coordination must be plan and subject for careful study and transportation also have a part
of a successful raid operation.
2. Identify the different items that may be seized during the raid.
-The seized items during the raid can be used as evidence that can possibly relate to
criminal charges. This includes stolen items, weapons, drug money, dirty money, illegal
drugs, drug paraphernalia and documents.
Assessment 2.1
-In conducting a raid, it is important first to know why there’s a need for an operation. What would be
its intention in administering such conduct, considering the things need to be studied before the raiding
team do the raid operation. There are factors and preparations to make the successful like detailed
planning about the situation of the target area. The plan must be simple and precise without any
alterations, sticking with the mission. All equipment and raiding authorities should be prepared, given by
the specific tasks or assignment briefed by team leader. Before the raid operation, immediately after
securing a search warrant, the raid commander must know if there is a proper coordination with
authorities that have the jurisdiction around premises where the subject is located. It can be prevention
for a possible misencounter and for the raiding team’s safety as well. During the raid, it is mostly done in
diminutive hours where the team is establishing a location not too close to the target area for final
instructions. When the time they enter that property, all related items possible for criminal charges
should be seized as well as the arresting the person legally if ever it is around that area. The things or
items seized can be used as evidence in the court of law. After the raid is done and completed or
successful, all participants will gather a final brief orientation and roll call of the raiding team.
6. How will you explain the characteristics that comprise a lawful raid?
- The characteristics that compromise a lawful raid is that searches and seizures during raid must
be carried out at a reasonable time unless this could frustrate the search purpose.
-Before doing a raid, there are some factors that need to be prepared and followed. First on the line
would probably know the situation of the building or terrain must be estimated and subject to close
study. Detailed planning is based on intelligence information. The plan must be simple, the more
complicated the plan where the more possible for non-success operation. Aggressive training and
accurate planning before the operation in connection to the elements of surprise must always be
considered. Considering, the strength of firearms or equipment must be superior to the target. Smaller
raiding authorities have more strategic advantages over more massive formations. All equipment to be
used must be adequately checked. Whereas, each member of the raiding team should be given a
specific assignment and operational tasks. The purpose or mission of operation should be briefed to all
members of the raiding team. Lastly, signal for coordination must be plan and subject for careful study
and transportation also have a part of a successful raid operation.
8. How will you explain the constitutional requirements concerning raid and seizure?
- The constitutional requirements concerning raid and seizure is that it will protect the privacy and the
rights of every citizen against excessive instructions made by the government. The law enforcement has
the right to conduct search and seizures during raid that are reasonable to prevent deprivation of rights
of every person. A search or seizure is reasonable if the police have a warrant from a judge based on
probable cause to believe that a suspect has committed a crime. Also, a search may be reasonable
without a warrant if an exception applies under the circumstances.
MODULE 2 POST-TEST
Part I
1. C
2. D
3. D
4. B
5. D
6. B
7. A
8. A
9. B
10. A
Part II
1. T
2. F
3. F
4. F
5. F
6. T
7. T
8. T
9. F
10. F