Sound and Material Softness

Reliability Analysis Results

In this graph each participant(box) Not:Burada 4,11,16 ve 20. katılımcıda neden box çıkmadığını
includes 775 rating anlayamadım
• -This is the boxplot graph for each adjective. For instance first axis=biçimlendirilebilir shows distributions
of mean ratings for all objects(25 element; mean(object1), mean(object2)…mean(object25))
• -From this graph we can infer adjectives with relatively small variance are not good measure for
softness(e.g. Toz gibi, vıcık…)
• -This figure uses the same mechanism with the previous figüre, but only difference is here it uses means in base
of objects (31 element for each boxplot; mean(adj1), mean(adj2)…mean(adj25) for a specific object)
• -From this graph we can infer adjectives with relatively small variance are not good measure item (e.g. Water
Glass)
• This figure illustrates every
object ratings Standard
Deviations (blue line),
Means(black line) and
Coefficient of
Variation(CV=STD/Mean as
purple line)

• The important thing about

this figure is being CV<1 and
so in all adjectives it is prooven
• This figure illustrates every objects ratings Standard Deviations (blue line),
Means(black line) and Coefficient of Variation(CV=STD/Mean as purple line)

• The important thing about this figure is being CV<1 and so in all adjectives it
is prooven
In contrast to previous graphs these boxplots were not created with only
means, elements of these boxplots includes all 775 ratings.
Histogram of object ratings which are fitted into normal distribution
Histogram of object ratings
This is our Cronbach’s Alpha line graph which includes outlier participant(14th)
and in this case just one adjective is below 0.7(tanecikli)
This is Cronbach’s Alpha line graph for each adjective which I excluded outlier participant(14th)
and in this case 18 adjective is below 0.7(tanecikli, et gibi, derimsi,hamurumsu…)