Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Photographs of Frederick H. Evans - Anne M. Lyden
The Photographs of Frederick H. Evans - Anne M. Lyden
E V A N S
I THE PHOTOGRAPHS of |
Frederick H . Evans
Anne M . Lyden
w i t h a n e s s a y by H o p e K i n g s l e y
T h e J . P a u l Getty M u s e u m , L o s Angeles
T h i s publication was p r o d u c e d to accompany L i b r a r y o f Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
the e x h i b i t i o n A R e c o r d of E m o t i o n : T h e P h o t o g r a p h s
Lyden, Anne M . , 1972-
of F r e d e r i c k H . E v a n s , held at the J . P a u l Getty M u s e u m ,
T h e photographs o f F r e d e r i c k H . E v a n s / A n n e M .
L o s Angeles, and at the National M e d i a M u s e u m ,
L y d e n ; w i t h an essay by H o p e Kingsley.
B r a d f o r d , E n g l a n d . T h e e x h i b i t i o n w i l l be on v i e w
p. cm.
in L o s Angeles from F e b r u a r y 2 to J u n e 6 , 2 0 1 0 , and i n
" P r o d u c e d to accompany the e x h i b i t i o n A record o f
B r a d f o r d from September 2 4 , 2 0 1 0 , to F e b r u a r y 2 0 , 2 0 1 1 .
emotion, the photographs o f F r e d e r i c k H . E v a n s , held at
the J . P a u l Getty M u s e u m from F e b r u a r y 2 to J u n e 6,
© 2010 J . P a u l G e t t y T r u s t
2010."
5 4 3 2 1
I n c l u d e s bibliographical references and i n d e x .
I S B N 9 7 8 - 0 - 8 9 2 3 6 - 9 8 8 - 1 (hardcover)
P u b l i s h e d by the J . P a u l Getty M u s e u m
1. E v a n s , F r e d e r i c k H . — E x h i b i t i o n s . 2. A r c h i t e c t u r a l
G e t t y Publications
photography—Great B r i t a i n — E x h i b i t i o n s .
1200 G e t t y C e n t e r D r i v e , Suite 5 0 0
3. L a n d s c a p e photography—Great B r i t a i n — E x h i b i t i o n s .
L o s Angeles, C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 0 4 9 - 1 6 8 2
4. Photography, A r t i s t i c — E x h i b i t i o n s . 1. E v a n s ,
www.getty.edu/publications
F r e d e r i c k H . 11. J . P a u l Getty M u s e u m , i n . T i t l e .
T R 6 4 7 . E 8 8 8 2010
Gregory M . Britton, P u b l i s h e r
779'.4-dc22
Dinah Berland, E d i t o r 2009025719
Katya Rice, M a n u s c r i p t Editor
Jeffrey C o h e n , D e s i g n e r
A m i t a Molloy, P r o d u c t i o n Coordinator ILLUSTRATION CREDITS
Vll
FOREWORD
MICHAEL BRAND
viii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
1
INTRODUCTION
11
A R e c o r d of Emotion: T h e Architectural Photographs of Frederick H . Evans
ANNE M. LYDEN
19
T h e "Idler": Evans i n the L i n k e d R i n g Years
HOPE KINGSLEY
3A2
PLATES
R
anked as one of the leading pictorial photographers exhibition for their generosity and willingness to loan photo
in the world, Frederick H . Evans (1853-1943) is known graphs from their collections: the Collection Centre Canadien
for his fine platinum prints of medieval cathedrals i n d'Architecture/Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montreal;
his native England. W h e n the J . Paul Getty Museum's Depart George E a s t m a n H o u s e International M u s e u m of Photogra
ment o f Photographs was founded i n 1984, the M u s e u m phy and F i l m , Rochester, N e w Y o r k ; the L o s Angeles County
obtained a significant number of Evans prints through the ac Museum of Art; and the Philadelphia Museum of Art.
quisition of the Samuel J . Wagstaff collection. Relatively few of It is hoped that this publication and the exhibition it ac
the pieces reproduced here have been exhibited or published. companies w i l l provide an opportunity for today's audiences
I n fact, the Getty M u s e u m ' s exhibition A R e c o r d of E m o t i o n : to view and be inspired by the photographs of F r e d e r i c k H .
T h e P h o t o g r a p h s of F r e d e r i c k H . E v a n s , w h i c h coincides with E v a n s , whose w o r k continues to reflect this great photogra
the publication of this book, is the first large-scale exhibition pher's devotion to beauty i n all things.
of Evans's photographs i n almost thirty years. W h i l e his archi
tectural images may be the best known, Evans's landscapes and
portraits are equally compelling.
The exhibition and this publication were generated
through the efforts o f the staff of the D e p a r t m e n t of Photo
graphs. Special thanks are due to A n n e L y d e n , author of the
book and curator of the exhibition, for her expertise and dili
gence in managing the entire project. I would like to extend my
gratitude to the National Media Museum, Bradford, England,
for not only graciously lending their fine platinum prints but
also serving as a venue for the exhibition i n E n g l a n d . I n addi
tion, I offer my sincere thanks to all the other lenders to this
MICHAEL BRAND
Vll
Acknowledgments
C
reating a publication is not a solo task; there are many Abbott, E r i n Garcia, Paul Martineau, Marisa Weintraub, E d i e
people involved, and their contributions, both great W u , and departmental volunteer A n n M c G e e . T h a n k s are also
and small, are essential to the overall s u c c e s s o f the due to Weston Naef, curator emeritus, for his early support
project. I w o u l d like to take this opportunity to thank all of the of this book. H i s discerning eye is responsible for bringing
colleagues, collectors, friends, and family who assisted me on the wonderful collection of F r e d e r i c k H . E v a n s to the Getty
this publication. Museum i n 1984.
First I w o u l d like to offer a very special thank-you to M r s . Marc Harnly, head of Paper Conservation; E r n i e Mack,
Janet Stenner, granddaughter of Frederick H . Evans. Without associate conservator; and Sarah F r e e m a n , assistant conser
her k i n d collaboration and assistance, this publication w o u l d vator, carried out expert treatments on the Getty Museum pho
not have been possible. tographs i n c l u d e d i n this volume. T h e y were ably assisted
I n the Department of Photographs at the J . Paul Getty by independent conservator Valerie Bass. I n addition, mount-
M u s e u m , I w o u l d like to thank J u d i t h Keller, acting senior makers Stephen Heer, L y n n e K a n e s h i r o , and R o n Stroud
curator of photographs, who offered guidance and enthusiastic prepared the Getty prints for inclusion i n this book and the
support to the project's successful completion. Special thanks accompanying exhibition. I am particularly grateful to them
are also due to M i c h a e l Hargraves, research associate, w h o for their insight, patience, and expertise i n working w i t h the
catalogued all the E v a n s prints w i t h i n the Getty holdings; photographs.
A n n e Lacoste, assistant curator, w h o arranged for the photog I am especially grateful for the support of Michael B r a n d ,
raphy of the prints; Virginia Heckert, associate curator, who director of the J . Paul Getty M u s e u m , for his leadership and
was often the sounding board to early ideas; and L i n d s a y vision, and D a v i d Bomford, associate director for collections,
Blumenfeld, staff assistant, w h o frequently came to the fore to w h o recognized the importance of this project and ensured
assist me w i t h the numerous tasks related to the book. T h e its completion.
entire staff o f the Department o f Photographs has been sup Gregory B r i t t o n , publisher, and his expert staff i n Getty
portive of this project, and I am grateful to all of them: Brett Publications are offered unending thanks and praise for all
vm
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
IX
FIGURE 1
XII
INTRODUCTION
O
ne c o u l d say that F r e d e r i c k H e n r y E v a n s {fig. 1} and committed. Indeed, i n using as many as six lenses for his
was b o r n at the right moment for photography: camera at this early point i n his career, Evans revealed his
his arrival into the w o r l d i n 1853 coincided w i t h investment—in the psychological as well as the monetary
the founding o f the Photographic Society (later the R o y a l sense of the w o r d — i n photography. 2
W i t h o u t formal train
Photographic Society) i n E n g l a n d . B u t though his fate may ing or m u c h experience, he had embarked on a photographic
have been sealed at birth, it would be some years before Evans career that w o u l d have lasting impact.
would come to realize it. E v a n s made his first official venture into the m e d i u m
As a young man E v a n s w o r k e d as a bookkeeper for a w i t h the showing of his photomicrographs to the Photo
sauce firm i n L o n d o n ' s East E n d , but ill health sent h i m to graphic Society i n 1886, and a year later he was awarded a
A m e r i c a i n about 1872 to stay w i t h an aunt i n P h i l a d e l p h i a . medal for his contributions to the Society's annual exhibition.
After returning to England, Evans resumed his work as a clerk Beauty was at the heart of his endeavors; even though his sub
and then by 1890 began w o r k i n g i n a bookstore on C h e a p - j e c t matter could be classified as scientific, it was his interest
side i n L o n d o n . H e soon became part owner o f the shop, and in the naturally repeating patterns and forms as aesthetic
w h e n his partner died, he assumed full responsibility for principles that motivated his w o r k .
the place. Evans d i d not confine himself to the natural w o r l d as
I n 1883 Evans bought a quarter-plate camera from George seen through a microscope; he also ventured outdoors into
S m i t h of the Sciopticon C o m p a n y and began taking photo nature, making a number of early landscapes of the English
graphs. H i s first images were "photo-micrographs" {fig. 2}, countryside. Seeking respite from the health problems that
photographs of tiny natural specimens—such as a cross- he seems to have struggled with all his life (most likely rheu
section o f a sea urchin—magnified under a microscope to matism), Evans traveled often to the Lake District i n the north
reveal striking forms and patterns. T h e y were a far cry from of E n g l a n d . T h e fresh air, stunning landscape, and breath
the typical beginner's work, the amateur family portraits and taking views were all tonic for m i n d and body. B u t w h e n pre
travel snapshots. F r o m the start, Evans's interest was serious sented w i t h the dramatic sweeping vistas and cliffs o f this
ANNE M. LYDEN
A s s o c i a t e C u r a t o r , D e p a r t m e n t of P h o t o g r a p h s , T h e J . P a u l G e t t y Museum
1
F I G U R E 2
F r e d e r i c k H . E v a n s ( E n g l i s h , 1 8 5 3 - 1 9 4 3 ) , F r : Sec: S p i n e o f E c h i n u s , x . 4 0 , c a . 1 8 8 7 .
P l a t i n u m p r i n t , 12.1 x 11.9 c m ( 4 % x 4 / i < i i n . ) . P h i l a d e l p h i a M u s e u m o f A r t 1 9 7 3 - 1 9 7 - 6 5
n
2
INTRODUCTION
region, Evans, interestingly, did not attempt to capture the view i n a large format. Instead, he
opted for rather small, delicate landscapes printed on platinotype paper {see plates 7, 8}. I n his
photomicrographs he had viewed the smallest of specimens i n magnification; now, i n contrast,
he presented the grandest of scenes i n the most intimate size. T h e s e "ordinary landscapes," as
he called them, had less i n common with the picturesque mammoth plates o f Roger Fenton,
w h o i n the 1850s had documented the region, than w i t h the recent landscape w o r k of P. H .
E m e r s o n and T . F. Goodall, whose platinum-print portfolio Life a n d L a n d s c a p e on the Norfolk
B r o a d s was issued i n 1887. 3
B y 1888 Evans's photographic w o r k included, along with the landscapes, "cathedral inte
r i o r s , . . .drop-shutter work, studies of hedgerows,... portraits, etc., etc." Clearly he was not
4
limiting himself to one genre; he was fluidly, and with the help of his bank of lenses, working
back and forth among all. H i s early images were often presented as glass lantern slides {see fig.
8 and plate 1}, w h i c h Evans favored for their luminosity and fidelity to the original negatives.
T y p i c a l l y measuring 3 !4 x 3 A inches, the glass slide was put i n a viewer and the image pro
l
jected onto an opaque surface. Evans made more than a thousand glass slides, w h i c h he used
extensively i n his public lectures, considering glass the perfect medium for his w o r k . "Paper, 5
with its lack of depth, its abrupt stoppage o f image at the surface, w i l l not fully or adequately
exhibit the entire value and charm o f these infinitely related planes," he explained, "but glass
can and does w h e n properly handled." Although his landscapes and photomicrographs held a
6
presentation and thus allowed for a more personal reading. Referring to his cathedral photo
graphs as "poems i n stone," Evans was drawing on his literary background and his keen aware
ness of the role imagination played i n his w o r k . 8
F r o m 1890 to 1898 Evans ran his bookshop, w h i c h brought h i m into contact with various
literary figures. O v e r the years many of them sat i n front of his camera, including D r . J o h n
Todhunter, an I r i s h poet and playwright {see plate 109}; H u b e r t B l a n d , w h o founded the
Fabian Society, an organization concerned w i t h the advancement of social democracy through
gradual reform {see plate 110}; the playwright George Bernard Shaw, who shared with Evans an
enthusiasm for the pianola {see plate i l l } ; the young A u b r e y Beardsley, whose graphic talents
9
Symons {see plate 113}. I n his portraits Evans attempted to evoke the sitter's personality. Using a
Dallmeyer-Bergheim lens because it afforded a greater degree of softness i n rendering facial
3
LYDEN
FIGURE 3 FIGURE 4
Julia Margaret Cameron (English, born India, 1815-1879), Frederick H . Evans (English, 1853-1943), The D e a n of E l y , ca. 1897.
H e n r y T a y l o r , 1864. Albumen silver print, 24.8 x 19.5 cm ( 9 % x y /i6
n
in.). Gum bichromate print, 24.4 x 18.9 cm ( 9 % x j V w i n . ) .
Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum 84.xz.186.12 Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum 84.XM.444.81
features, he tended to isolate his sitters with little background detail or props, in order to con
vey their psychological presence. Evans's inspiration was the great British portraitists of the
nineteenth century, in particular the photographic partnership of David Octavius Hill and
Robert Adamson and fellow photographer Julia Margaret Cameron {fig. 3}. I n a review of
Cameron photographs Evans wrote:
When one looks at these really astonishing portrait studies, and remembers also those of
D . O . Hill, and then recalls the technical difficulties, the doubtful operations, the long
exposures, the imperfect plates, etc., etc., these artists had to contend with, one feels a new
sort of respect, and feels quite ashamed that even the best work of to-day is not better than
it is. How few of our ripest works can show so much of the same order of excellence, of
spiritual insight, that so completely informs these works of Mrs. Cameron's? 11
The softness of focus and the delicate handling of light that he singled out in Cameron's work
are qualities found in his own. I n a further indication of his high regard for Cameron, Evans
made direct copies of her photographs and printed them in platinum.
4
INTRODUCTION
W i l l i a m Morris, the leader of the Arts and Crafts movement, did not sit for Evans, though
he may have been a visitor to his bookstore, but E v a n s took his portrait, i n a sense, w h e n he
photographed Kelmscott Manor at Morris's invitation i n 1896. T h e T u d o r house {see plates
12
2 8 - 3 5 } had since 1871 been the summer home of Morris and, until 1874, of the Pre-Raphaelite
painter Dante Gabriel Rossetti. Kelmscott played a key role i n Morris's life; he used it i n his
novel about a Utopian socialist society, N e w s f r o m N o w h e r e , and even named his private press
after it. Evans seems to have returned to Kelmscott shortly after Morris's death i n October 1896;
it may have been during this second visit that Evans completed the "portrait" of this great artistic
figure.13
He recorded spaces that had obvious personal significance, such as Morris's bedroom
{see plate 32}. Evans also studied the location and considered the architectural space i n a series
of views, such as the attic images {see plates 3 4 , 3 5 } , that sought to capture something of the soul
of the place—the unspoiled craftsmanship and organic feel that had attracted Morris.
I n 1900, two years after he retired from the bookshop so he could concentrate on photog
raphy, Evans was elected to the Brotherhood of the L i n k e d R i n g , a group of photographers w h o
seceded from the Photographic Society i n 1892 to establish their own artistic circle. T h e schism
within the Photographic Society that led to the formation of the L i n k e d R i n g revolved around
the premise of photography as a fine art. Believing the Society to be too scientific i n its approach
to the medium, many photographers sought to bring a more pictorial style to the photographic
process, and none more so than Evans, who had always been concerned with aesthetics. W h i l e
he considered himself a Pictorialist, Evans was also an advocate of straight photography; that is,
he did not believe i n altering the negative, and he felt that handwork on the print should be kept
to a m i n i m u m or not done at all. T h i s was somewhat contrary to the popular trend of the time,
where many photographers were exploring media such as gum and bromoil as a means to
express the painterly qualities of their work. W h e n Evans addressed the members of the Royal
Photographic Society on the occasion of his exhibition i n 1900, he indicated little interest i n
exploring these painterly processes. G i v e n that he was "unable to draw, sketch, or paint," Evans
said, he was "more likely to go wrong than right i n the enormously free printing-development
powers the gum process gives." 14
One of the journals reports, however, that by 1902 Evans "has taken up gum this year, and
displays his versatility by showing no less than ten pictures." 15
H i s gum bichromate portrait of
the dean of E l y is an example of his use of the control process, as it was called {fig. 4}. H e had
made this choice, Evans explained, "because the hair was too hard i n the negative to print prop
erly i n platinotype, without ruining the facial modeling; second, because I wanted to try for a
portrait of the ' D e a n of Ely,' more than merely a portrait of Dr. Charles Stubbs. I wanted to
emphasise his deanship, i n addition to getting a true likeness of the m a n . " B u t Evans continued
16
to use platinum as his medium of choice and maintained that a good negative was a prerequisite
for any print. One should celebrate the photographic qualities of the medium, he believed, rather
than trying to pass off a photograph as a drawing or painting: "Photography is photography; and
in its purity and innocence is far too uniquely valuable and beautiful to be spoilt by making it
imitate something else. Its power of rendering complexity with clearness, of perfect detail, and
perfect mass also, gives a claim to its being kept as pure i n its process as possible." 17
Since 1886 Evans had written extensively on photography, w i t h numerous articles on his
own w o r k and the medium i n general. H e was a regular contributor to popular British journals
18
5
FIGURE 5
6
INTRODUCTION
edited and published by Alfred Stieglitz from 1903 to 1917. Stieglitz, a major proponent of pho
19
tography as a fine art and the leader of the Photo-Secession i n N e w Y o r k , wrote of Evans:
He stands alone i n architectural photography, and that he is able to instill into pictures of
this k i n d so m u c h feeling, beauty, and poetry entitles h i m to be ranked with the leading
pictorial photographers of the w o r l d . H i s w o r k once more exemplifies the necessity of
individuality and soul i n the worker, for of the thousands w h o have photographed cathe
drals, none has imbued his pictures with such poetic qualities coupled with such masterful
treatment. 20
The reception of Evans's w o r k at the 291 show i n N e w Y o r k was less positive. One reviewer
commented on Evans's perfectionism as a sterile, negative quality—a response that, under
standably, frustrated the English photographer. W h i l e he did not deny that he strove for what
was sometimes called a "logical perfection," Evans felt that the critic had completely missed the
poetry i n his work. T o Evans's surprise, he sold very little w o r k from this show. Money was very
m u c h on his m i n d : his letters to Stieglitz from this period make several mentions of his meager
income, of special concern because of his growing family. I n 1900 he had married A d a E m i l y
23
Longhurst {fig. 5; see plate 120}, with w h o m he soon had three children, Barbara, E v a n , and
Geoffrey.
Finances may have been his reason for accepting a commission i n 1905 from C o u n t r y Life
magazine, established i n 1897. H i r e d to photograph various E n g l i s h country houses, parish
churches, and F r e n c h châteaux, Evans was essentially given the freedom to photograph his
subjects as he w i s h e d and was required only to deliver his best examples for publication. E v e n
though he was now doing his w o r k on a professional basis, Evans continued to enter some of his
images i n the annual Salon of the L i n k e d R i n g . B u t his submissions did not always meet with the
favor of the j u d g i n g committee: his view of a F r e n c h château, entitled L e M o y e n A g e {plate 18},
was the only photograph of his to be included i n the 1908 Salon. I t was quite a snub to a photog
rapher w h o had been represented i n the past with multiple entries.
W h e n C o u n t r y L i f e gave Evans a commission to photograph Westminster Abbey i n con
nection w i t h the coronation of K i n g George V i n 1911, it was an opportunity to revisit familiar
motifs {see plates 95-102}. Evans thought highly of the photographs, despite the commercial
nature of the work, and later, i n 1922, he w o u l d present the series at the exhibition P h o t o g r a p h i c
P i c t u r e s of W e s t m i n s t e r A b b e y at the R o y a l Photographic Society.
After the Westminster photographs, however, Evans's two-decade documentation of
England's great ecclesiastical sites began to w i n d down. H i s images continued to appear i n the
7
LYDEN
FIGURE 6
Frederick H . Evans (English, 1853-1943), Facsimile of Aubrey Beardsley Drawing, ca. 1895.
Platinum print, image: 9.2 x 23.3 cm ( 3 % x g / w in.); sheet: 9.7 x 23.5 cm (3^16 x g A in.);
3 l
mount: 21.7 x 38.6 cm (8 /ie x i5 /ie in.). L o s Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum 84.XM.444.100
9 3
pages of C o u n t r y Life until 1920, but between 1912 and 1919 he focused on creating enlarge
ments of graphic illustrations from and for literature {fig. 6 } , including W i l l i a m Blake's wood
cuts for Virgil-, H a n s Holbein's D a n c e of D e a t h woodcuts; and Aubrey Beardsley's G r o t e s q u e s ,
w h i c h he privately published. H i s platinum prints faithfully captured the style and content of
the originals, but at the same time they possessed a graphic quality of their own when trimmed
and mounted onto his papers. Evans undoubtedly saw the potential of photography as a means
for recording and disseminating these artworks. After the second decade of the twentieth cen
tury his days of roving w i t h the camera for weeks at a time were, with a few notable exceptions
{e.g., see plates 6,10,12}, few and far between.
I n 1924 Evans presented his collection of photographic works—some of his own and many
by other photographers—to the R o y a l Photographic Society ( R P S ) , and i n 1928 he was elected
an H o n o r a r y Fellow of the R P S . T w o years later, w h e n Evans was no longer taking photo
graphs, the R P S ' s holdings of his w o r k grew significantly with a gift by A l v i n L a n g d o n C o b u r n
{see plate 115} of his prints. T w o exhibitions i n the early 1930s of E v a n s ' s w o r k , i n L o n d o n
and Manchester, provided the swan song to a highly prolific career. Despite a slower pace, age
did not bring w i t h it any lessening of his commitment to straight photography. Offering a print
of his landscape Reflets d a n s V e a u {plate 6 } to J . D u d l e y Johnston at the R P S i n 1932, he wrote:
"Put it as an addition to my little lot i n your Permanent C o l l e c t i o n as a specimen of Pictorial
Photography w h i c h is also straight, a b s o l u t e l y neither negative nor print having the least mark
on 'em or any help i n printing. I f only photographers w o u l d take enough trouble to get per
fectly balanced n e g a t i v e s " 2 4
8
INTRODUCTION
from friends and colleagues, including Charles Emanuel, the most senior member of the L i n k e d
R i n g at the time of Evans's death, who remarked that despite being "small in frame, frail look
ing," E v a n s "was full of energy, a coiled up spring, devoted to the arts i n w h i c h he was so profi
cient." 25
B u t it is perhaps the comments of J . R . H . Weaver that best describe this accomplished
and dedicated photographer: " E v a n s was a strong individualist, artistically highly sensitive,
and one i n w h o m emotion lay very close to reason" {fig. 7}. 26
Notes
1 George Bernard Shaw, " E v a n s — A n Appreciation," C a m e r a 13 Martin Barnes, "Photography in Britain and America," in
W o r k , n o . 4 ( O c t o b e r 1903), p . 16. L i v i n g s t o n a n d Parry, I n t e r n a t i o n a l A r t s a n d C r a f t s ( L o n d o n ,
2 I n 1888 E v a n s w r o t e : " I have s i x single lenses, v a r y i n g i n 2 0 0 5 ) , p . 136.
focus from 6 i n c h e s to 12 A i n c h e s , a n d these, i n c o m b i n a t i o n ,
l
14 E v a n s , A d d r e s s to R o y a l P h o t o g r a p h i c S o c i e t y (note 7 ) , FIGURE 7
9
S p i n e o f E c h i n u s T. S. x 2 i , 1 8 8 6 .
Glass lantern slide, image: 7.1 x 7.1 c m
( 2 / i e x 2 / i e in.);
13 13
FIGURE 9
Frederick H . E v a n s ( E n g l i s h , 1 8 5 3 - 1 9 4 3 ) ,
P e n d u l u m C u r v e , 1899-1910.
Pen and ink on paper,
image: 11.1 x 6.8 c m ( 4 % x 2 / I G in.); u
F I G U R E 10
Frederick H . E v a n s ( E n g l i s h , 1 8 5 3 - 1 9 4 3 ) ,
N o r t h A i s l e , t o E a s t , from C a n t e r b u r y
C a t h e d r a l A l b u m , 1 8 9 0 , plate 8.
Platinum print, 15.2 x 11.4 c m
(6 x 4 / 2 in.). Santa Fe, N e w M e x i c o ,
1 /
A n d r e w Smith Gallery
10
A Record of Emotion:
T h e Architectural Photographs of
Frederick H . Evans
- F R E D E R I C K H . EVANS
M
ore than simply recording their architectural fea A follower of the S w e d i s h theologist E m a n u e l Swedenborg
tures, Frederick H . Evans sought an emotional con ( 1 6 8 8 - 1 7 7 2 ) , E v a n s believed that all physical things owed
5
nection w i t h the cathedrals he photographed. " T r y their existence to a divine power and therefore saw a spiritual
for a record of an emotion rather than a piece of topography," connection between the monumental stone structures of the
he urged students i n 1904. "Wait until the building makes you cathedrals and the minute specimens seen in the photomicro
feel intensely . . . then try to analyse what gives y o u that feel graphs. T h e similar patterns found i n both only strengthened
ing . . . and then see what y o u r camera can do towards repro the relationship between the two disparate subjects. Merging
ducing that effect." 2
the scientific and aesthetic, his use of J o s e p h G o o l d ' s twin-
It is Evans's passion for his subject that distinguishes h i m elliptic harmonograph to create pendulum drawings provided
from the multitude who photographed medieval cathedrals. further evidence of E v a n s ' s interest i n mathematics-based
D e v o i d of obvious narrative and avoiding the pedantic, Evans's patterns: the seemingly infinite spirals of the drawings recall
photographs are imbued with a delicacy of light and shadow the cross-section of a snail-like organism or the succession of
that evokes the hallowed spaces i n a timeless way. H e succeeds cloisters or ribbed vaulting i n a cathedral {figs. 8 - 1 0 } . 6
in providing an "experience" of the building that goes beyond Evans described his cathedral photographs as studies, and
the recording of the physical structure and even the artistic indeed they were: he approached each building i n a methodi
properties of the actual print to become an emotional response cal, measured way. First he took copious notes—notes on the
in and of itself. 3
best views, how the light fell at certain times of day, the length
F r o m the very beginning E v a n s was interested i n the of exposure needed, w h i c h lens to use, and so on. T h e n he
notion of beauty. " I was first led to the study of microscopy, proceeded to create the images, with the finished photographs
and also of photography, by my life-long love and study of serving as a compendium of the site. Evans advocated estab
'the beautiful,'" he wrote in 1886. H i s attention to beauty also
4
lishing a government department responsible for maintaining
related to a more spiritual awareness of the p h y s i c a l w o r l d . a national archive of cathedral images. I n 1900 he argued:
ANNE M. LYDEN
11
LYDEN
I f we valued our great architecture as we ought, we should not only have photographic
records to scale, of all the important details, etc., but we should also have every aspect of our
great buildings, i n general and i n particular, from the point of view of beauty; so that the
present appearance, i n the best conditions of lighting, might be on record for both our
current delight and the inestimable j o y of our descendants, w h e n these architectural trea
sures are gone forever. 7
FIGURE 12 F I G U R E 13
Joseph Mallord William Turner (English, 1775-1851), Frederick H . Evans (English, 1853-1943),
I n t e r i o r of Galilee Porch, Ely C a t h e d r a l , 1794. Ely, Galilee Porch i n t o N a v e , 1905.
Pencil and watercolor on paper support, Platinum print, 24.1 x 17.5 cm ( 9 % x 6 % in.).
27 x 19.6 cm ( 1 0 % x 7 / i 6 in.). From the album
n
Los Angeles County Museum of Art M . 2 0 0 8 . 4 0 . 7 2 2
F i n b e r g X X I I E . London, Tate Gallery D 0 0 0 3 5 8
12
a recors of amotion
FF II G
GUU RR EE 14
14
Even at this early date i n his photographic career, Evans displayed a truly remarkable com
mand o f both the m e d i u m and his subject. H i s documentation o f buildings such as Canterbury
and Gloucester Cathedrals was unusual i n itself—no one else came close to Evans's methodical
approach—but what really makes these images stand out from the plethora o f cathedral views
(before and after Evans) lies i n his ability to capture the physical structures while i m b u i n g the
scene w i t h poetry and romance, displaying an imagination that goes beyond merely recording
these stone structures.
A l t h o u g h there was a strong tradition of architectural photography that might have served
as inspiration for his w o r k , Evans claimed i t was the delicate watercolors of Joseph M a l l o r d
W i l l i a m Turner {fig. 12} that were the catalyst for his o w n cathedral pictures {fig. 13}. A d m i r i n g
"the superb sense o f height, bigness, light, atmosphere, grandeur that this incomparable artist
had managed to suggest w i t h i n the few inches that comprise these small p i c t u r e s , " 10
Evans
wondered i f he could achieve the same success i n photography w i t h his o w n cathedral studies.
Somewhat surprisingly, Evans does not mention any photographer as having influenced
his w o r k on architectural subjects. H e must have been familiar, however, w i t h the w o r k of Roger
Fenton, whose cathedral pictures were extremely popular i n the mid-nineteenth century. There
13
LYDEN
is certainly a similarity i n the w o r k o f the two English photographers. For example, Fenton's
view o f Lichfield Cathedral {fig. 14}, like some o f Evans's cathedral views, exploits the notion o f
the doorway, where the open gate i n the foreground, coupled w i t h the open door i n the center
o f the composition, leads the viewer into the scene. B u t the similarity ends there. Fenton has
included two people poised at the threshold i n his composition, implying a narrative and pro
v i d i n g a sense o f scale. 11
T h e figures' contemporary dress places the picture at a very specific
moment i n time and forces an awareness o f past and present on the viewer. Evans, i n contrast,
rarely included figures i n his architectural compositions. H e strove for a timeless quality, one
that leaves r o o m for an emotional response rather than being didactic.
T h e L i n k e d R i n g photographer and critic Alfred Horsley H i n t o n saw Evans as expressing
"emotional enjoyment" w h e n documenting cathedrals. Evans's subject was not "architecture
for architecture's sake," wrote Horsley H i n t o n , " b u t all that it symbolizes, and the aesthetic j o y
i n contrasts, curves, and columns, the spectacular value of w h i c h provides a 'holy l u x u r y o f the
eye.'" 12
Interestingly, the critic took those final words from J o h n Ruskin's seminal w o r k The
Stones of Venice, i n particular a passage connecting Nature and the Gothic cathedral. A visual 13
analogue o f Ruskin's idea appears i n Evans's landscapes o f Redlands Woods {see plate 4 } ,
w h i c h present the trees as soaring columns w i t h i n Nature's nave.
For all the popularity o f his subject matter, Evans's w o r k was not commercial. H e d i d not
produce i n quantity (even the most iconic views do not exist i n more than half a dozen platinum
prints), and he demanded perfection for p r i n t quality and presentation. Compared w i t h George
Washington W i l s o n or Francis F r i t h , b o t h of w h o m ran extremely successful, profitable enter
prises that sold popular views to the p u b l i c , Evans was operating w i t h i n the realm o f fine art.
Evans treated his subjects—often the same as those i n Wilson's and Frith's work—less pedan
tically and more artistically. H i s views were carefully composed, u t i l i z i n g the effects o f light
and shadow as modeling tools i n creating the architectural image. Rather than simply identify
ing the building as a place o f worship, Evans imbued the photograph w i t h a sense o f awe and
wonder that reinforced the spiritual qualities o f the space. H i s view o f the interior o f York
Minster {see plate 89} is dramatically different from Wilson's {fig. 15}. W h i l e W i l s o n presents
a straightforward representation o f the five grisaille w i n d o w s , Evans reveals only two o f them,
choosing instead to focus on the play o f light o n and above the tomb figure.
T h e w o r k o f Pieter Jansz. Saenredam, the seventeenth-century D u t c h painter o f church
interiors, provides an interesting parallel {fig. 16}. Saenredam and Evans share the same sense
14
o f volume, space, and recession, but whereas the D u t c h painter could combine several view
points to arrive at his finished perspectival piece, Evans was able to present only what he saw
before h i m i n the g r o u n d glass. Furthermore, the painter was able to embellish his w o r k w i t h
details that simply d i d not exist (or details that no longer existed by the time o f the painting i n
1628), such as an altarpiece and a stained-glass w i n d o w that had been removed i n about 1600
for being too ostentatious i n post-Calvinist H o l l a n d . Evans could not deviate from the scene
before h i m , and his refusal to manipulate his negatives meant that patience and persistence were
needed to record the image he wanted. " A perfect photograph," he wrote, "is one that perfectly
records, reflects its subject; gives its beholder the same order o f j o y that the original w o u l d ;
conveys the m o o d and atmosphere so as to accurately recall the original feeling or create it i n
one w h o can only see the p r i n t . " 15
14
A RECORD OF MOTION
FIGURE 15 FIGURE 16
views o f the house from the R i v e r T h a m e s , E v a n s leads the viewer toward the site, into the
house itself, through the various chambers, and up to the attic at the top. H i s photographs of the
sparse loft {plates 34, 35} are arguably some of the most spiritual of his career. Replete w i t h
symbolism—from the rough-hewn beams that call to m i n d the Christian cross, to the light that
emanates from the doorway and beckons the viewer to ascend and cross the threshold from one
room (or state of being) to another, unseen but represented by a beautiful w a r m light—the pho
tographs are mystical. Evans's subtitles for the attic p r i n t s — N o . 1 and [No.] 2—suggest that one
precedes the other; the wider view takes us to the more detailed one and leads us on a spiritual
and physical j o u r n e y through the space. 16
Evans's emotional connection to his architectural subjects is evident partly i n his returning
to the same site time and again i n the hope of really capturing it i n his photographs. H i s image
of Wells Cathedral "A S e a of S t e p s " {plate 67}, made i n 1903, is a case i n point. I t took Evans
several attempts over several years before he succeeded i n securing the sense of energy and pas
sion he felt for the subject. I n an earlier view of the same subject, made by Evans i n 1900 {plate
66}, the staircase is shown from a different perspective, and though the turning o f the steps
leads one around and upward, there is not the sense of undulating rhythm that is found i n the
later print. Evans described it best himself:
15
LYDEN
T h e steps now [ i n the 1903 photograph] rise steeply before one, and the extraordinary
wear i n the top portions, leading to the corridor, is now shown j u s t as it appeals to the eye
i n the original subject, a veritable sea o f steps, the passing over them o f hundreds o f foot
steps . . . have w o r n them into a semblance of broken waves, low-beating on a placid shore.
— T h e beautiful curve o f the steps on the right as they rise to the height o f the Chapter
House floor, is for all the w o r l d like the surge o f a great wave that w i l l presently break and
subside into smaller ones like those at the top o f the picture. I t is one o f the most imagina
tive lines i t has been my good fortune to try and depict, this superb m o u n t i n g o f the steps
on the r i g h t . 17
Wells Cathedral, named after a natural spring i n the area, was begun i n 1180, although
there had been a c h u r c h o n the site since 705. T h e cathedral was a p o p u l a r subject for many
photographers, among them Roger Fenton i n the late 1850s, w h o were fascinated by its Gothic
architecture, i n c l u d i n g the stairs leading to the Chapter House. T h e p h o t o g r a p h by Joseph
Cundall and Downes & Co. {fig. 17}, w h i c h was featured i n an 1862 publication on the building,
shows the same staircase that Evans's prints do, but one could be forgiven for thinking other
wise, given the markedly different treatment. I n the earlier albumen silver p r i n t , the ascending
steps cut diagonally across the composition, taking the viewer u p w a r d from the lower left to the
top right. T h e steps i n Cundall's photograph are almost obliterated as a blown-out area of broad
highlight, whereas i n Evans's 1903 c o m p o s i t i o n the same steps are represented as a wavelike
m o t i o n about to crest over us like a baptism. T h e delicacies o f tone that shape and model each
w o r n step i n the Evans p r i n t are completely absent i n the 1862 version.
I n 1911 Evans was commissioned by Country Life to photograph West
minster A b b e y i n connection w i t h the coronation of K i n g George V {see plates
95-102}. Because o f the preparation involved i n readying the cathedral, Evans
was able to photograph the interior over an extended p e r i o d o f t i m e . 18
With
the pews and furniture removed, the great expanse o f the cathedral opened for
h i m . Evans was at liberty to explore and find the best place for his camera so
as to create strong recessional depth. As was typical i n all his cathedral work,
he found places where he could frame structures w i t h i n structures and show a
procession of archways or a series of open doors; then he waited patiently until
the moment when crepuscular light flooded the otherwise dimly lit interior. T h e
double-coated emulsion he used gave h i m more freedom i n his exposures
w h i l e simultaneously allowing a great range i n l i g h t i n g . " I t is the atmo
spheric charm, the superb contrasts i n lighting that I have made my chief aim,"
he e x p l a i n e d . 19
Especially p r o u d o f this w o r k , Evans wrote to Stieglitz that
the Westminster series was "the very best effects of real light and atmosphere I
have ever got or seen, and all straight prints, pure photography." Evans's last 20
16
A RECORD OF EMOTION
Notes
17
FIGURE l8
Frederick H . E v a n s ( E n g l i s h , 1 8 5 3 - 1 9 4 3 ) , P o r t r a i t o f G e o r g e A d o l p h u s S t o r e y , A . R . A . , n . d .
Platinum print, 25 x 19.3 c m ( 9 % x 7 % in.). Bradford, E n g l a n d ,
RPS Collection at the National Media M u s e u m / s s P L 2 0 0 3 - 5 0 0 i _ 2 _ 2 2 2 7 6
18
The "Idler":
Evans in the Linked Ring Years
I
n 1900 F r e d e r i c k Evans was elected to the L i n k e d R i n g exhibitions and vetting exhibitors through invitations from the
B r o t h e r h o o d o f photographers and given the pseudo Selection Committee.
nym " I d l e r . " T h e sobriquet was i n keeping w i t h the The Photographic Salon was a key venue for international
Brotherhood's rather droll version of a secret society; L i n k s Pictorialist photography, and L i n k e d R i n g members founded
took names suggested by their artistic personalities or their other alliances, such as the Photo-Club de Paris and the Photo-
roles within the R i n g . Evans's choice was deliberately incon Secession o f N e w Y o r k . I n many cases these groups h a d
gruous; methodical and meticulous, he was the very antithesis seceded from more conventional institutions, j u s t as the L i n k e d
of an idler. T h e name may have derived from D r . Johnson's R i n g had been formed i n opposition to the Photographic So
eighteenth-century essays but was more likely inspired by a ciety, Britain's oldest and most respected photographic asso
contemporary periodical, the I d l e r ' , w h i c h intersected w i t h ciation. T h e R i n g was summed up i n a satirical piece: " A l l
2
Evans's eclectic artistic and literary circle. Gatherings called [ L i n k s ] entertained the idea that they were real artists... [and
" I d l e r A t H o m e s " were attended by A u b r e y Beardsley {see saw] the rest of the photographic w o r l d as bitterly hostile to
plate 112}, the writer Dr. J o h n Todhunter {see plate 109}, and themselves, photography as a graphic art little, if at all, inferior
G . A . Storey of the Royal Academy {fig. 18}. 1
to painting or sculpture, and the Royal Photographic Society
Evans's accession to the L i n k e d R i n g was a belated em as an effete and dying institution craving for their support as a
brace: he h a d exhibited at the R i n g ' s Photographic Salons drowning man clings to a straw." 3
from at least 1894 on and had shown works at the Brotherhood's Evans presented m u c h of his most progressive w o r k at the
progenitor, the Camera C l u b of L o n d o n . Most of the B r i t i s h Salons, yet i n terms of the aesthetic debates of the time he was
photographers represented at the 1892 C a m e r a C l u b I n v i t a t i o n often seen as a traditionalist. H i s allegiance was to the direct,
E x h i b i t i o n became L i n k s , and others, such as Evans, w o u l d unmanipulated photograph, produced from a carefully exposed
participate i n the Salons by invitation. T h e 1893 Photographic and developed negative and printed, without overt retouching,
Salon was supposedly independent of the L i n k e d R i n g , yet on platinum paper, a photographic printing paper whose long
behind the scenes the R i n g was already i n place, running the tonal range faithfully replicated natural luminance through a
HOPE KINGSLEY
19
KINGSLEY
FIGURE 19
ALFERS MASKELL(ENGLISG 1857) lANDASCEPE CA.1898,GUMBICHMATE PRINT 9.3X11. 11.9CM(31/2X4 1/2 IN)
Bradford, E n g l a n d , R P S Collection at the National Media M u s e u m / s s P L 2 0 0 3 - 5 0 0 i _ 2 _ 2 0 i o i
SUBTITLE GRATCTION OF TONE IN THE EARLU IGOOS EVANS JOINED DEBATED ABOUT THE PURE PH
subtle gradation of tones. I n the early 1900s Evans j o i n e d a debate about "pure" photography
4
set against
versus whatexperimental works"Impressionist"
was loosely called such as gum bichromate prints,Hwhose
photography. rough,photographs
i s "straight" hand-coated were sur
5
faces and blurred outlines d i d not look conventionally photographic. I n the " I m p r e s s i o n i s t " 6
camp was Alfred Maskell {fig. 19}, one of the founders of the R i n g : " I have before now attracted
a certain amount of derision because I have asserted that a photographic picture is a better and
more artistic production the less it bears resemblance to a photograph." 7
P r i n t s a n d Presentation
Attentive to the relationship between photography's material characteristics and its expressive
evident
qualities,respect
Evans for the spirit,
discussed thei f painterly
not the result,
gum of his approach.
prints of fellow LEvans's own Demachy
i n k Robert fidelity was
w ito
t h the
an
8
full representational power of photography, and this led h i m to champion glass transparencies
and their broad range of luminosity. B u t his exhibition prints were made as platinotypes, w h i c h
had other, sympathetic aesthetic characteristics. T h e uncoated surface of platinum prints
9
retained the velvety "tooth" of a paper texture also found i n the fine books and engravings that
20
THE " I D L E R "
Evans appreciated as a bookseller and a collector. T h e neutral image color of platinotypes was
important as well, for restraint i n the treatment o f color was a concern at a time w h e n bright,
aniline dyes were glaringly visible i n the commercial graphic arts. Evans himself was partial to
English black-and-white illustration w o r k . 10
F I G U R E 20
21
FIGURE 21
Frederick H . E v a n s ( E n g l i s h , 1 8 5 3 - 1 9 4 3 ) , H e i g h t a n d L i g h t i n B o u r g e s C a t h e d r a l , ca. 1 9 0 0 .
Photogravure print, 27.5 x 19.5 cm ( 1 0 % x 7 % in.). Published in C a m e r a W o r k , no. 4 (October 1903).
L o s Angeles, J . Paul Getty M u s e u m 9 3 . X B . 2 6 . 5 . 2
22
T H E " I D L E R "
ethos could have been Evans's: " T h e seal o f finish... [as] the final touch of the maker, should be
the evidence that he has passed j u d g m e n t on his o w n creation and confirms the intention o f
unified expression throughout his w o r k . " 16
i n keeping w i t h evolving taste. U n t i l the early 1890s, photographic exhibitions had been a sty
listic free-for-all, w i t h pieces mounted and framed i n a variety o f colors and finishes, including
glaring white Bristol board mounts set w i t h i n cheap gold frames. But the Photographic Salon
presented a new look i n 1893, its very first year. George Davison, a member o f the exhibition
committee, described "the quieter and more harmonious effect, b o t h as regards the individual
pictures and the whole gallery[,] produced by close framing and lower-toned m o u n t s . " 18
H e favored fine papers i n muted earth colors, a taste shared w i t h Links such as Davison, w h o
advocated "coffee-tinted etching papers.. Japanese papers... [and] hand-made crayon papers
(grey, b r o w n , buff, greenish grey, brown-green)." Such materials were inspired by the Arts and
20
made mounts and m o u n t i n g papers i n the 1910 Houghtons photographic catalogue were avail
able i n appropriately Aesthetic "grosvenor green," "gray bark," "mist gray," and "autumn
b r o w n , " among other poetically titled hues. Houghtons described some of its ready-cut papers
22
as suitable for "the new American system o f mounting." T h a t m i g h t have been a reference to
the style o f multiple layered mounts {see plate 40} used by Evans and the American photogra
pher Fred H o l l a n d Day {see plate 114}, a friend and fellow L i n k , b u t the genesis o f the term
may have been more prosaic: i n 1908, Evans reported that his mounts were made from papers
imported from A m e r i c a . 23
By the time layered mounts were adopted for the elegant pages of Alfred Stieglitz's Camera
Work {fig. 21}, Evans had moved on to single mounts inked w i t h narrow ruled borders {see plate
38}. H e was inspired by the presentation o f engravings and lithographs, w h i c h were set off from
their surrounds by r u l e d borders whose interstices were filled w i t h light tints o f complemen
tary colors {fig. 2 2 } . 24
Evans p r o m o t e d layered mounts as an accessible presentation for those
insufficiently skilled to manage ruled borders. T h i s approach was popular; i n 1907 the Kodak
Recorder r e p r o d u c e d family snapshots pasted onto m u l t i p l e paper m o u n t s . 25
A shortcut was
available by 1911, w h e n the Craftsman introduced mounts w i t h colored borders that imitated
multiple m o u n t i n g {fig. 2 3 } . T h i s k i n d o f fakery w o u l d not have appealed to Evans the purist.
26
Yet, while he was emphatic i n his rejection o f the idea that photographs should emulate the
material characteristics o f other visual arts, his mounts often show an embossed surround to the
p r i n t , reproducing the plate strike-mark o f p r i n t m a k i n g . 27
23
K I N G S L E Y
FIGURE 22
H u b e r t R o b e r t ( F r e n c h , 1 7 3 3 - 1 8 0 8 ) , L a n d s c a p e w i t h R u i n s , 1772. P e n a n d b r o w n i n k , b r o w n a n d blue w a s h e s ,
over b l a c k c h a l k o n paper, 57.2 x 7 8 . 1 c m (22 V2 x 3 0 % i n . ) . L o s A n g e l e s , J . P a u l G e t t y M u s e u m 8 3 . G G . 3 7
F I G U R E 2 3
2 4
T H E " I D L E R "
colour must not be felt i n and for itself, b u t only as a differentiating something to what is on each
side o f i t . " 2 8
Evans p u t his ideas into practice w h e n he took over the design and hanging o f the Photographic
Salon i n 1902. H e criticized previous exhibitions: " T h e mass o f low-toned pictures i n low-
toned frames, on a low-toned background[,] have given a sense o f d e p r e s s i o n — Y o u felt the
show was probably a sad and d u l l o n e . " 29
Evans lightened the walls w i t h a j u t e canvas covering,
a cream-colored dado rail, and matching vertical moldings that broke the r u n o f pictures o n the
wall. T h e walls above the dado were covered i n a light gray arras, a heavy, handwoven fabric.
T h e installation i n c l u d e d a velarium, an overhead awning that diffused the brightness o f the
gallery skylights. Velaria had been used i n private L o n d o n galleries for over a century, and one
is visible i n James M c N e i l l Whistler's d r a w i n g o f the Society o f B r i t i s h Artists e x h i b i t i o n i n
1886-87 {fig. 24}. By 1895 a velarium had been installed at the Photographic Salon at the Dudley
Gallery, and two years later George Walton included an elaborate tented canopy i n his design
for the Eastman International E x h i b i t i o n {fig. 2 5 } . 30
f i g u r e 2 5
U n k n o w n p o t o g r a p h e r i n s t a l l a t i o n e a s t m a s i n t e r n a t i o n a l p h o t o g r a p h u i c
E x h i b t i o n , t h e n e w g a l l e r y l o n d o n , 1 8 5 7 , h a l f t o n e i l l u s t r a t i o 9 n f r o m
t h e ; p t r a c t i c l e p h o t o g r a p h e r 8 , n o 8 5 ( j a n u a r y 1 8 5 4 7 )
Br a f o r d e n g l a n d r p s l i b r a r y t h e n a t i o n a l m e d i a m u s e u m
d k a oc k c o l l e c t i o n m i a s c 0 0 1 8 0
FIGURE 24
25
KINGSLEY
FAIGURE 26
u n k n o w n p h o t o g r a p h e r , i n s t a l l a t i o n p h o t o g r a p h e r s a l o n , 1 9 0 5 h a k f r t o n e i l l u s t r a t i o n ,
in comparison with Walton's Eastman installation ,evan;s hang ewas restrined to the
p o i n t o f austerity, and he retained this p r i n c i p l e over the next four years. H i s 1905 Photographic
Salon installation, i n the more elegant venue o f the Royal Society o f Painters i n Water Colours,
used the same architecture i n a subtle palette o f bay-leaf green walls, b r o w n dado, and d u l l gold
moldings {fig. 26}.
Evans's aesthetic reflected an evolution i n e x h i b i t i o n design, tending toward spaciousness .
and simplicity i n reaction to V i c t o r i a n clutter and ornamentation. A leading concern was over-
crowded walls; the Royal Academy was notorious for stacking frames from floor to ceiling so
that some were "skyed" (very high) or " f l o o r e d " (very l o w ) , b u t at the Grosvenor Gallery and
Whistler's Society o f British Artists exhibitions, a more comfortable number o f pictures were
h u n g at most two or three deep. T h e Photographic Society packed the space at its annual exhi-
bitions, and one o f the spurs to the f o u n d i n g o f the R i n g was the d e m o t i o n o f H . P . Robinson's
photographs from their accustomed and preferential place " o n the l i n e " ( o f sight). A t the 1897
Photographic Salon, where committee members had argued i n vain for a reduction i n works
h u n g , George Walton achieved a partial solution by organizing the photographs into irregularly
spaced g r o u p s . 31
I n 1902 Evans improved o n this arrangement, cutting the number o f pictures
and j u x t a p o s i n g p r i n t , m o u n t , and frame colors for an overall harmony w i t h i n each section—
especially i m p o r t a n t w h e n setting neutral-hued p h o t o g r a p h s , such as Evans's p l a t i n o t y p e s ,
against the sometimes b r i g h t colors o f p i g m e n t p r i n t s . T h e idea owed m u c h to W h i s t l e r ' s
Society o f British Artists exhibitions, where pictures were grouped relative to their size, color,
and tone, so that Whistler's nocturnes were not overwhelmed by larger, more h i g h l y colored
works. 32
Evans's choice o f wall color was also part o f a c o n t i n u u m . T h e default color for the D u d l e y
Gallery was m a r o o n , very like the d u l l red at the Society o f British Artists' Suffolk Street rooms
(before Whistler changed the color to a more Aesthetic-style yellow). By 1897, Photographic
Salon organizers such as James Craig A n n a n were militating for a different wall color. " I t w o u l d
be distinctly interesting to observe the effect o f d o i n g away w i t h what M r . Craig A n n a n has
26
T H E " I D L E R
called the maroon nightmare, and o f replacing i t w i t h a suitable shade o f coarse canvas w i t h a
frieze o f light linen above," George Davison n o t e d . 33
T h e Dudley's dark red walls were o l d -
fashioned, so the designer o f the 1897 Salon, George Walton, covered the walls i n rough, light
b r o w n canvas, a material and color very close to what Evans w o u l d use for the 1902 Salon.
Walton described the decor as similar to that of Whistler's 1886 show at Dowdeswell's Gallery,
where the " b r o w n paper" wall color and d u l l gold detailing echoed the wrappers o f some o f
Whistler's pamphlets and catalogues. 34
T h i s combination translated into Evans's 1902 Salon
catalogue as a rough b r o w n paper cover w i t h gold lettering. Likewise, i n 1905 his color scheme
for the Salon had dark b r o w n and green walls framed i n "dead g o l d " rails and panels. 35
T h e following year was the last Salon o f the L i n k e d Ring. T h e Selection Committee now
included fewer Americans but more British members; Evans j o i n e d , as d i d new Links F. J.
M o r t i m e r and J o h n D u d l e y Johnston. However, the issue o f unrepresentative exhibitions re
mained; o f sixty-eight members o f the L i n k e d Ring, only forty-six showed i n the 1909 Salon.
Evans exhibited six photographs. 38
T h e Salon had lost its impetus and democratic ethos, and at a January 1910 meeting George
Davison proposed an "honourable b u r i a l . " 39
T h e eleven Links present—including Evans,
D u d l e y Johnston, and Maskell—had intended only that the Salon be given u p , not that the Ring
be disbanded. B u t i t was soon recognized that w i t h o u t exhibitions the Ring w o u l d lose its rai
son d'etre, and so the Brotherhood was dissolved.
Some Links returned to the Camera Club, where they, and the Ring, had begun. Evans
became more involved w i t h the Royal Photographic Society, staging exhibitions and publishing
articles i n the Photographic Journal. I n 1924 and 1937 he donated dozens o f photographs to
Dudley Johnston's newly established Royal Photographic Society Collection. Evans mounted
27
KINGSLEY
each p r i n t i n his distinctive style, and today one can spot his gifts i n the collection, surrounded
by their beautiful ruled borders and signaling a well-chosen selection o f important works by
Links such as James Craig A n n a n , Robert Demachy, Fred H o l l a n d Day, and Alfred Stieglitz,
among many others.
Frederick Evans's works were admired for their thoughtful use o f technology and materials,
tastefully presented i n a modern style inspired by traditional modes. Evans was, above all, care
fully attentive to the details that accumulated into an evocative whole. H i s artistic vision was
praised by the artist G . A . Storey i n 1897:
Endowed w i t h taste and an infinite capacity for taking pains, he is, to my thinking, a true
artist. N o t content w i t h the mere reproduction o f the sacred walls and their antique col
umns and finíais, their vaulted roofs w i t h their varying lines and curvature, and hundreds
o f other beauties,.. .he must needs w i t h all due diligence watch day after day for the
moment when a ray of light streaming d o w n on the pavement gives lustre and beauty to the
w o r k , and then judge and consider and decide h o w m u c h , and no more, shall come into
his picture, i n order to give full value to the p o r t i o n he finally selects for his plate. Surely,
all this is artist's w o r k . 4 0
Storey identified two key qualities i n art, "taste" and "faithfulness," and suggested them as
a motto for a photographer—"one that he might write u p o n his camera: 'Taste, w i t h faithful
ness'; and perhaps, i f he whispered it into his little box, that little box might reply, 'Yes, y o u do
the taste, I ' l l do the faithfulness.'" 41
I n Evans's w o r k and ethos, these two attributes were evi
dent and i n generous supply.
Notes
1 O n the " A t H o m e s , " see D o u g l a s Sladen, Twenty Years of My 4 F r e d e r i c k H . Evans, "Glass versus Paper," Camera Work,
Life ( L o n d o n , 1914; r e p r i n t e d W h i t e f i s h , M o n t a n a , 2 0 0 4 ) , n o . 10 ( A p r i l 1905), p p . 3 6 - 4 1 .
p . 5 9 . G e o r g e B e r n a r d Shaw {see plate 111} was also p a r t o f this 5 O n Maskell's " I m p r e s s i o n i s m , " see " P i c t o r i a l P h o t o g r a p h y at
c i r c l e ; see J e r o m e K . J e r o m e , My Life and Times ( L o n d o n , C h a r i n g Cross R o a d : T h e C a m e r a C l u b ' I n v i t a t i o n
1926), p p . 1 6 0 - 6 3 . Evans p h o t o g r a p h e d o t h e r Idler contribu E x h i b i t i o n , ' " Amateur Photographer 16, n o . 420 ( O c t o b e r
tors a n d guests, i n c l u d i n g the w r i t e r G e o r g e E g e r t o n {see 1892), p . 282.
plate 118} a n d the i l l u s t r a t o r D o r a C u r t i s {see plate 119}. See 6 Evans, " W h a t Is a S t r a i g h t P r i n t ? " Amateur Photographer 46,
P h i l i p Waller, Writers, Readers, and Reputations: Literary Life n o . 1191 ( J u l y 1907), p p . 111-12.
in Britain, i8yo-igi8 ( O x f o r d , 2 0 0 6 ) , p p . 417-18. 7 A l f r e d M a s k e l l , " T h e C l a i m s o f P h o t o g r a p h y to R e c o g n i t i o n as
2 F o u n d e d i n 1853, the P h o t o g r a p h i c Society (chartered i n 1894 An" Journal of the Camera Club 5, n o . 6 0 ( J u l y 1891), p . 141.
as the R o y a l P h o t o g r a p h i c Society) was a f o r u m for profes 8 Evans, " N o t e s o n T h r e e E x a m p l e s o f the W o r k o f R o b e r t
sionals, manufacturers, a n d serious amateurs. Its e x h i b i t i o n s D e m a c h y , " Amateur Photographer 3 8 , n o . 997 ( N o v e m b e r
i n c o r p o r a t e d p i c t o r i a l , scientific, a n d c o m m e r c i a l c o n t r i b u l
9°3)i PP- 39°~93- T h e i r p h o t o g r a p h i c relations were n o t
tions i n a c r o w d e d a n d disparate m i x . T h e L i n k e d R i n g always so c o r d i a l ; see Camera Work, nos. 18 a n d 19 ( A p r i l a n d
founders were a m o n g those p h o t o g r a p h e r s w h o d i s l i k e d the J u l y 1907), a n d R o b e r t D e m a c h y , " O n the S t r a i g h t P r i n t , "
inartistic company they—and their photographs—were Camera Work, n o . 19 ( J u l y 1907), p p . 2 1 - 2 4 .
forced to keep at the Society's e x h i b i t i o n s . 9 Evans, " S t r a i g h t versus C o n t r o l l e d P r i n t s , " Amateur
3 "Jones versus the M e m b e r s o f the L i n k e d R i n g , " British Photographer 51, n o . 329 ( M a r c h 1910), p . 3 0 3 .
Joimial of Photography 64, n o . 1915 ( J a n u a r y 1897), p . 3 8 . 10 Evans, " A r t i n M o n o c h r o m e , " Amateur Photographer 47,
28
T H E " I D L E R "
29
=j PLATE 1 |
H a w t h o r n a n d B l a c k b e r r y , ca. 1883
32
I PLATE 2
33
PLATE 3
34
PLATE 4 |
I n R e d l a n d s Woods: S u r r e y , 1899-1904
35
I PLATE 5 |
N e w F o r e s t , 1896-97
36
1 PLATE 6 |
37
—I PLATE 7 J
O n t h e R o a d to W a t e n d l a t h : B o r r o w d a l e , ca. 1885
38
PLATE 8
39
IP L A T E 9
C h a t e a u G a i l l a r d , ca. 1906-7
40
plate 10
herstmoncen castle, Susses:steps to the upper Garden 1918
41
plate 11
ingoldmells.ca1898
42
I P L A T E 12 |
Rye: f r o m W i n c h e l s e a , 1915
43
j P L A T E 13 |
A v i g n o n , P a l a i s des P a p e s , 1907
44
P L A T E 14
45
I PLATE 15 I
A t C h a n t i l l y , ca. 1906-7
46
I P L A T E 16 |
M o n t St. M i c h e l : C l o i s t e r s , 1906
47
A perfect photograph is one that perfectly records, reflects its subject
gives is behlder the same order of joy yjat je orginal would
F R E D E R I C K H. E V A N S
=j P L A T E 17 |
P r o v i n s [ , F r a n c e ] , 1906-7
49
=\ P L A T E 18 1
50
I PLATE 19 {=
P r o v i n s , ca. 1906-7
51
1 P L A T E 20 |
52
I P L A T E 21 |
53
=\ P L A T E 22 | =
54
I PLATE 23 | =\ PLATE 24 \ =
55
1 P L A T E 25 I
56
PLATE 26
G l o u c e s t e r C a t h e d r a l : N a v e to E a s t
57
1 P L A T E 27
G l o u c e s t e r C a t h e d r a l , ca. 1900
58
=\ P L A T E 28 J
59
==========^ PLATE 29
K e l m s c o t t M a n o r : F r o m the G a r d e n , 1896
6ao
plate 30
kelmsscott int he Garden 1896
61
1 P L A T E 31 |
62
I PLaATE 32 t-
Kelmscott Manor: William Morris'Bedroom, 1896
63
=\ P L A T E 33 |
6 4
plate 34
kelmscott manor:in theattics(no.1)1896
65
PLATE 35
66
=| P L A T E 36 | =
67
P L A T E 37 |
68
1 P L A T E 38 1
L i n c o l n C a t h e d r a l f r o m the C a s t l e , 1898
69
I P L A T E 39 |
70
I P L A T E 40 1
71
1P L A T E 4 1
72
=j P L A T E 42 |
73
I P L A T E 43 |
74
1 PLATE 44 |
L i n c o l n C a t h e d r a l , 1895
75
| P L A T E 45 |
7 6
I P L A T E 46 |
77
I P L A T E 47 |
78
I PLATE 48 1
79
PLATE 49
Ely Cathedral: A Memory of the Normans S.W. Transept to Nave, 1899
80
= j P L A T E 50 |
[Ely C a t h e d r a l : ] N o r t h S i d e [ , ] N o r t h T r a n s e p t , 1897-1900
81
I P L A T E 51 1
82
] P L A T E 52 | =
83
= | P L A T E 53 | =
8 4
PLATE 54
[Ely Cathedral;] Gargoyle in Nave Triforium, 1897-1900
85
5
1 P L A T E 55 |
Southwell—Detailed.. 1902
86
=1 P L A T E 56 | 1 P L A T E 57 |
87
PLATE 58
Southwell Cathedral, Chapter House Entrance Detail, 1898
88
=1 P L A T E 59 | | P L A T E 60 |=
S o u t h w e l l C a t h e d r a l , C h a p t e r H o u s e , E n t r a n c e C a p i t a l s , 1898 S o u t h w e l l C a t h e d r a l , C h a p t e r H o u s e C a p i t a l , 1898
89
PLATE 61
90
=j P L A T E 62 | =
91
I P L A T E 63 |
92
=\ P L A T E 64
93
I P L A T E 65
94
Plate 66
Walls cathedral stairs and entrance chapter house 1990
95
T h e beautiful curve of the steps on the right
as they rise to the height of the Chapter H o u s e floor,
is for all the w o r l d like the surge of a great wave
that w i l l presently break and subside into smaller ones.
FREDERICK H. E V A N S
I P L A T E 67 |
97
=\ P L A T E 68 1
98
| PLATE 69 |
99
^ P L A T E 70 |
100
1 P L A T E 71 |
101
| P L A T E 72 1
102
] P L A T E 73 1
103
=j P L A T E 74 |
B o u r g e s C a t h e d r a l , F r a n c e : S c u l p t u r e o n West F r o n t — N o a h a n d t h e A r k , 1899
104
=j P L A T E 75- 1 -
B o u r g e s C a t h e d r a l : J u d g m e n t P a n e l , West F r o n t , 1899
105
1 P L A T E 76 | 1 P L A T E 77 I
B o u r g e s C a t h e d r a l , 1900 H e i g h t a n d L i g h t i n B o u r g e s C a t h e d r a l , 1900
io6
I P L A T E 78 1
107
Photography is photography; and i n its purity and innocence
is far too uniquely valuable and beautiful
to be spoilt by making it imitate something else.
FREDERICK H. EVANS
1 P L A T E 79 |
109
PLATE 80 PLATE 81 PLATE 82
Winchester [Cathedral:] Winchester [Cathedral] Nave: Details Winchester [Cathedral:] Details of Nave Roof
The Nave, W, ca. 1885 [of] Iron Grille, 1900 and Clerestory, 1900
110
1 P L A T E 83 | =
Ill
I l\\
| P L A T E 84 |
[York M i n s t e r : ] E n t r a n c e to C h a p t e r H o u s e , 1901
112
I P L A T E 85 1
113
I PLATE'86 |=
114
=j P L A T E 87 | -
"5
=\ P L A T E 88 \ =
116
==\ P L A T E 89 | =
117
] PLATE 90 1
R o u e n C a t h e d r a l , 1899-1905
118
1 PLATE 91 |=
119
O f the thousands w h o have photographed cathedrals,
none has imbued his pictures w i t h such poetic qualities
coupled w i t h such masterful treatment.
ALFRED STIEGL1TZ
I P L A T E 92 | =
C h a r t r e s C a t h e d r a l : N o r t h P o r c h , ca. 1910
121
^ P L A T E 93 f =
122
PLATE 94
123
PLATE 95
[Westminster Abbey,] Chapel of Henry VII: Roof of Fan Tracery Vaulting, 1911
124
=] P L A T E 96
125
1 P L A T E 97 [
126
^ P L A T E 98
127
=1 P L A T E 99 |
128
1 P L A T E 100 |
129
=j P L A T E 101
130
P L A T E 102
131
PLATE 103
132
PLATE 104
Durham Cathedral: From the Close, 1912
133
1 P L A T E 105 |
D u r h a m Cathedral, 1912
134
I P L A T E 106 |
D u r h a m C a t h e d r a l , ca. 1911
135
I P L A T E 107 |
136
I P L A T E 108 [
137
1 P L A T E 109 |
138
1 P L A T E 110 |
H u b e r t B l a n d ( F a b i a n S \ o c i e t y \ ) , ca. 1895-1900
139
plate 111
George birwarl slave 1992
140
-j P L A T E 112 \
A u b r e y B e a r d s l e y , 1894
141
| P L A T E 113 |
A r t h u r S y m o n s , ca. 1895-1900
142
1 P L A T E 114 |
143
\ P L A T E 115 |
A l v i n L a n g d o n C o b u r n , ca. 1900
144
1 P L A T E 116 |
J e r o m e P o l l i t t , ca. 1894
145
I P L A T E 117 |
P h y l l i s H a t t o n , ca. 1900
146
=\ P L A T E 118 |
147
I P L A T E 119 1
D o r a C u r t i s , ca. 1895-1900
148
1 P L A T E 120 |
149
Plate List
N O T E : Items marked with an asterisk (*) have multiple paper mounts, and the dimensions shown are for the final mount.
Philadelphia Museum of Art 1975-158-9 M O U N T : 48.3 x 37.1 cm (19 x 14% in.) Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
Rochester, New York, George Eastman House
PLATE 3 84.XM.444.85
International Museum of Photography and
I n D e e r l e a p W o o d s , ca. 1908
F i l m 81:1198:12 PLATE 13
Platinum print
A v i g n o n , P a l a i s des Rapes, 1907
I M A G E : 14.6 x 11.1 cm (5% x 4 /s in.) 3
PLATE 8
Platinum print
M O U N T : 51.4 x 37.5 cm ( 2 0 A x 14% in.)
l
A n English Glacier: Near S u m m i t ofScafell,
I M A G E : 24.2 x 19.1 cm ( 9 V 2 x 7V2 in.)
Philadelphia Museum of Art 1968-220-8 ca. 1905
M O U N T : 45.2 x 33.5 cm (i7 /io x i3 /ie in.)
13 3
Platinum print
PLATE 4 Bradford, England, R P S Collection at the
I M A G E : 25.2 x 16.5 cm (Q /IG 15
x 6V2 in.)
I n R e d l a n d s Woods: S u r r e y , 1899-1904 National Media Museum/ssPL RPS 482
M O U N T : 48.9 x 34.4 cm (19 VA X 13^16 in.)
Platinum print PLATE 14
Philadelphia Museum of Art 1968-220-2
I M A G E : 29.1 x 22.9 cm ( l i M e x 9 in.) Winchelsea: Stairs to Queen Elizabeth's Well,
M O U N T : 52.1 x 36.8 cm (20/2 x 14Vi in.) PLATE 9 ca. 1905
Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum C h a t e a u G a i l l a r d , ca. 1906-7 Platinum print
84.XM.444.34 Platinum print I M A G E : 22.9 x 18.9 cm (9 x 7 ^ 6 in.)
I M A G E : 14.9 x 9.8 cm ( 5 % x 3% in.) M O U N T : 49.1 x 37.5 cm (i9 /ie x 14% in.)
5
PLATE 5
M O U N T : 33 x 25.4 cm (13 x 10 in.) Rochester, New York, George Eastman House
N e w F o r e s t , 1896-97
Philadelphia Museum of Art 1968-220-14 International Museum of Photography and
Platinum print
F i l m 81:1198:98
I M A G E : 14.4 x 20.2 cm ( 5 / i 6 x 7 /ic in.)
u 15
PLATE 10
Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum H e r s t m o n c e u x Castle, Sussex: PLATE 15
84.XM.444.83 Steps t o t h e Upper G a r d e n , 1918 A t C h a n t i l l y , ca. 1906-7
Gelatin silver print Platinum print
I M A G E : 18.6 x 23.5 cm (yVw x 9M in.) I M A G E : 23.5 x 17.1 cm (9M x 6% in.)
M O U N T : 31.9 x 43.2 cm (i2 /ie x 17 in.)
9
M O U N T : 39.1 x 28.3 cm (i5 /s x 11 Ys in.)
3
150
PLATE LIST
PLATE 16
M o n t St. M i c h e l : C l o i s t e r s , 1906
Gloucester Cathedral Kelmscott Manor
Platinum print Formally named the Cathedral Church of Saint Kelmscott Manor was built in the late 1500s
I M A G E : 21 x 11.1 cm (8!4 x 4% in.) Peter and the Holy and Undivided Trinity, adjacent to the River Thames. Beginning in
M O U N T : 35.6 x 24.8 cm (14 x 9% in.) this Romanesque and Gothic building in 1871 the Tudor farmhouse was the summer
Philadelphia Museum of Art 1968-220-42 the southwestern part of England was begun home of William Morris, leader of the Arts and
in 1089 and completed in 1499. During the Crafts movement.
PLATE 17
nineteenth century the cathedral was restored
P r o v i n s [ , F r a n c e ] , 1906-7 PLATE 28
by the architect Sir George Gilbert Scott.
Platinum print K e l m s c o t t M a n o r : F r o m t h e T h a m e s , 1896
I M A G E : 10.3 x 13.3 cm (4Me x 5% in.) PLATE 2 2 Platinum print
M O U N T : 38.1 x 22.9 cm (15 x 11 in.) G l o u c e s t e r [ C a t h e d r a l ] : T o m b of E d w a r d I I , I M A G E : 7.8 x 20.2 cm ( 3 M 6 x 7 / I G 1 5
in.)
Philadelphia Museum of Art 1968-220-43 ca. 1889 M O U N T : 28.3 x 35.7 cm (11 Ys x 14V\o in.)
Glass lantern slide Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
PLATE 18
I M A G E : 7.1 x 7.3 cm (2 /ie x 2% in.)
13
84.XM.444.96
C h a t e a u Chevenon (Nevers): L e M o y e n A g e ,
P L A T E : 8.3 x 8.3 cm ( 3 ^ x 3 /} in.) 1
Rochester, New York, George Eastman House Gloucester Cathedral: E n t r a n c e to M O U N T : 28.3 x 35.7 cm (11 Vs x 14 V\G in.)
International Museum of Photography and A m b u l a t o r y a n d C r y p t , 1890 L o s Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
F i l m 81:1198:35 Glass lantern slide 84.XM.444.97
I M A G E : 7.1 x 7.1 cm ( 2 / I G x 2 /ie in.)
1 3 13
PLATE 19 PLATE 30
P L A T E : 8.3 x 8.3 cm (3% x $ A l
in.)
P r o v i n s , ca. 1906-7 K e l m s c o t t M a n o r : I n t h e G a r d e n , 1896
L o s Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
Platinum print Platinum print
84.XH.1616.8
I M A G E : 27.3 x 8.8 cm (10% x 3 V 1 6 in.) I M A G E : 18.3 x 14.3 cm ( 7 / I G X 5%
3
in.)
M O U N T : 43.6 x 21.5 cm ( I 7 / I G x 8716 in.)
3
PLATE 24 M O U N T : 35.7 x 28.3 cm ( I ^ V I G x 11 Vs in.)
Rochester, New York, George Eastman House Gloucester Cathedral: South T r i f o r i u m L o s Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
International Museum of Photography and t o E a s t , 1890 84.XM.444.92
F i l m 81:1198:19 Glass lantern slide
PLATE 31
I M A G E : 5.1 x 7.3 cm (2 x 2% in.)
K e l m s c o t t M a n o r : I n t h e T a p e s t r y R o o m , 1896
P L A T E : 8.3 x 8.3 cm (3% x 3 ^ in.)
Canterbury Cathedral L o s Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
Platinum print
I M A G E : 18.3 x 14.8 cm ( 7 / I G x 5 / I G in.)
3 1 3
1896
PLATE 20 Philadelphia Museum of Art 1970-31-27
Platinum print
"A M i s t y M o r n i n g " — C a n t e r b u r y Cathedral:
PLATE 26 I M A G E : 17.3 x 14.9 cm ( 6 / I G X 5%
1 3
in.)
A n g e l T o w e r a n d D a r k E n t r y , 1889
G l o u c e s t e r C a t h e d r a l : N a v e t o E a s t , 1891 M O U N T : 35.9 x 28.3 cm (14Vs x i \ V s in.)
Platinum print
Platinum print Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
I M A G E : 14.7 x 10.2 cm (5 /ie x 4 in.)
13
Platinum print
I M A G E : 15.2 x 9.5 cm (6 x 3% in.) Philadelphia Museum of Art 1968-220-10
I M A G E : 14.6 x 10.2 cm (5% x 4 in.)
M O U N T : 32.4 x 26 cm (12% x 10 A l
in.)
M O U N T : 32.4 x 26 cm (12% x 10!4 in.)
L o s Angeles County Museum of Art
Los Angeles County Museum of Art
M.2008.40.725
M.2008.40.726
151
A
PLATE 34 PLATE 39
E l y Cathedral
Kelmscott M a n o r : I n the Attics (No. 1 ) , Roofs[: V i e w of t h e B e l l T o w e r of L i n c o l n
1896 C a t h e d r a l ] , 1895-98 Located in Cambridgeshire, England, the
Platinum print Platinum print Cathedral Church of the Holy and Undivided
I M A G E : 15.6 x 20.2 cm ( 6 V s x J 1 5
AG in.) I M A G E : 11.7 x 9.4 cm ( 4 % x 3 / i 6 in.) u
Trinity was built between 1083 and 1375. It is
M O U N T : 28.3 x 35.7 cm (11Vs x 14Vie in.) F I R S T M O U N T : 14 x 11 cm ( 5 / 2 x 4 / i 6 in.) 5
an example of Romanesque and Gothic styles
Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum S E C O N D M O U N T : 42.1 X 32 CHI of architecture. Dominating the low-lying
84.XM.444.89 (i6 /ie x 12% in.)
9
countryside in which it is set, the cathedral is
Montreal, Collection Centre Canadien known locally as "the ship of the Fens."
PLATE 35
dArchitecture / Canadian Centre for
K e l m s c o t t M a n o r : I n t h e A t t i c s ([No.] 2 ) , 1896 PLATE 45
Architecture PH1984:0503
Platinum print E a s t E n d [ : V i e w of t h e E a s t F a c a d e of
I M A G E : 19.9 x 14.9 cm ( 7 % x 5% in.) PLATE 40 E l y C a t h e d r a l ] , ca. 1901
M O U N T : 35.6 x 28.6 cm (14 x 11 A in.) L
L i n c o l n C a t h e d r a l : S t a i r s i n S. W. T u r r e t , Platinum print
Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum 1898 I M A G E : 9.7 x 7.2 cm (3% x 2 / I G in.) 1 3
M O U N T : 49.5 x 33.7 cm (19 V2 x 13^ in.) M O U N T : 52.1 x 32.4 cm (20/4 x 12% in.)
(IO /IG x y / i 6
3 3
in.)
S E C O N D M O U N T : 41.9 X 32.4 C m Bradford, England, R P S Collection at the
S E C O N D M O U N T : 32.5 x 25.2 cm
(16 V2 x 12% in.) National Media Museum/ssPL RPS 4381/3
(i2 /i6 x g A e in.)
13 1 5
152
PLATE LIST
PLATE 50 PLATE 60
Southwell Cathedral Southwell Cathedral, Chapter House
[Ely Cathedral:] N o r t h Side[ ] } North
T r a n s e p t , 1897-1900 Noted for its exquisite botanical carving, the C a p i t a l , 1898
Platinum print Cathedral and Parish Church of the Blessed Platinum print
I M A G E : 19.4 x 15.4 cm ( 7 % x 6 Vic in.) Virgin Mary is an example of Romanesque I M A G E : 11.4 x 8.7 cm ( 4 / 2 x 3^10 in.)
F I R S T M O U N T : 22.1 x 17.3 cm and Gothic architecture. It was built between M O U N T : 22.8 x 16.2 cm (9 x 6 /s 3
in.)
( 8 / i 6 x 6 / i 6 in.)
n 1 3
about 1108 and about 1300 in Nottinghamshire, Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
S E C O N D M O U N T : 52.1 X 32.4 C m England. 84.XM.444.54
(20 A x 12% in.)
l
PLATE 55
Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
S o u t h w e l l — D e t a i l , ca. 1902 Wells Cathedral
84.XM.444.17
Platinum print
Known as the most poetic of the English
PLATE 51 I M A G E : 11.1 x 9.2 cm (4 /s x 3 /s
3 5
in.)
cathedrals, the Cathedral Church of Saint
E l y C a t h e d r a l : B i s h o p A l c o c k ' s C h a p e l , 1897 M O U N T : 31.8 x 24.1 cm (12V2 x 9 / 2 in.)
Andrew at Wells, England, was built in
Platinum print Los Angeles County Museum of Art
the style of Early English Gothic between
I M A G E : 26 x 17.9 cm (10 VA x 7 /ie in.) 1
M.2008.40.716
1176 and 1490.
M O U N T : 33 x 24.2 cm (13 x 9% in.)
PLATE 56
Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum PLATE 61
Southwell Cathedral, North Transept
84.XM.444.44 W e l l s C a t h e d r a l : F r o m t h e M o a t , ca. 1903
T r i f o r i u m , 1898
Gelatin bromide print
PLATE 52 Platinum print
I M A G E : 17.6 x 23.7 cm ( 6 / i 6 x Q A G in.)
1 5 5
Platinum print
84.XM.444.14 M O U N T : 17.2 x 11 cm (6% x 4 /w 5
in.)
I M A G E : 8.7 x 10.6 cm (3V16 x 4 /ie in.) 3
153
PLATE LIST
PLATE 66
Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
Wells C a t h e d r a l : S t a i r s a n d E n t r a n c e
84.XM.444.32 84.XP.219.6
t o C h a p t e r H o u s e , 1900
Platinum print PLATE 71 PLATE 76
I M A G E : 19.8 x 14.8 cm ( j / i 6 x 5 / I G in.)
1 3 1 3
Angel, C h o i r Chapel, R h e i m s Cathedral, B o u r g e s C a t h e d r a l , 1900
* M O U N T : 43.8 x 31.7 cm (17% x 12 V2 in.) ca. 1900 Platinum print
Bradford, England, R P S Collection at the Platinum print I M A G E : 12.4 x 8.6 cm (4% x 3 % in.)
National Media Museum/ssPL RPS 5011/1 I M A G E : 25.4 x 16.5 cm (10 x 6V2 in.) M O U N T : 14.9 x 10.2 cm ( 5 % x 4 in.)
M O U N T : 43.3 x 33.2 cm (17Me x 13 Vie in.) Los Angeles County Museum of Art
PLATE 67
Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum M.2008.40.731
"A Sea of S t e p s " — S t a i r s t o t h e C h a p t e r
89.XM.64
H o u s e , W e l l s C a t h e d r a l , 1903 PLATE 77
Platinum print Height a n d L i g h t i nBourges Cathedral,
I M A G E : 24 x 19 cm ( g V i e x 7/2 in.) Bourges Cathedral 1900
* M O U N T : 30 x 24.4 cm ( n / i 6 x 9% 1 3
in.) Platinum print
Bourges Cathedral, dedicated to Saint Stephen,
Bradford, England, R P S Collection at the I M A G E : 11.9 x 7.1 cm ( 4 / I G x 2% h
in.)
was begun in 1195 and completed in 1270.
National Media Museum/ssPL RPS 5012/1 F I R S T M O U N T : 20.6 X 12-3 C m
Located in Bourges, France, the cathedral
(8 /8X
1
4
1 3
/i in.)
G
PLATE 68 is in the style of High Gothic and features
S E C O N D M O U N T : 32.6 x 26 cm
W e l l s C a t h e d r a l : C a n o p y of A l t a r i n B i s h o p two distinct horseshoe aisles that enclose the
(i2 /ie x 10/4 in.)
13
f r o m t h e S t r e e t ] , ca. 1900
M A T : 32.4 x 45.2 cm (12% x i 7 / i e in.) 13
PLATE 78
Platinum print
L o s Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum B o u r g e s C a t h e d r a l A i s l e a n d N a v e , 1900
I M A G E : 11.6 x 7.2 cm (4 /ie x 2 /ie in.)
9 13
Platinum print
M O U N T : 52.2 x 32.1 cm (20/ ie x i2 /s in.)
/ 5
154
PLATE LIST
Located in Winchester, in southeastern and 1472, the cathedral is one of the largest M O U N T : 52.4 x 32.4 cm (20% x 12% in.)
England, the building is noted for its exquisite of its kind in northern Europe. Philadelphia Museum of Art 1968-220-29
Gothic nave, which, with its ribbed vaulting,
PLATE 84
is one of the longest in Europe.
[York M i n s t e r : ] E n t r a n c e to C h a p t e r Rouen Cathedral
PLATE 80 H o u s e , 1901
Our Lady of Rouen was built between 1202 and
Winchester [Cathedral:] The Nave, W., Platinum print
1876 in the styles of Gothic and Romanesque
ca. 1885 I M A G E : 19.7 x 13.1 cm (7% x 5 /ie in.) 3
PLATE 88
155
PLATE LIST
array of portal sculpture remains intact. F I R S T M O U N T : 26.7 x 17.5 cm (10V2 x 6% in.) F I R S T M O U N T : 25.4 x 20.4 cm (10 x 8 in.)
S E C O N D M O U N T : 52.1 x 32.4 cm S E C O N D M O U N T : 26.7 x 32.4 cm
PLATE 92
(20 Yi x 12% in.) (10 Y2 x 12% in.)
C h a r t r e s C a t h e d r a l : N o r t h P o r c h , ca. 1910
Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
Platinum print
84.XM.444.13 84.XM.444.6
I M A G E : 24.9 x 19.8 cm ( 9 / I G X 7 / I G in.)
1 3 1 3
[ W e s t m i n s t e r A b b e y , ] C h a p e l of H e n r y VII:
S E C O N D M O U N T : 51 x 37.4 cm
R o o f of F a n T r a c e r y V a u l t i n g , 1911 PLATE 100
(20 Me x 14% in.)
Platinum print [ W e s t m i n s t e r A b b e y : ] Confessor's Chapel,
Rochester, New York, George Eastman House
I M A G E : 21.7 x 18.7 cm ( 8 / I G X 7 / S in.)
9 3
C o r o n a t i o n C h a i r w i t h Stone of Scone, 1911
International Museum of Photography and
F I R S T M O U N T : 24.4 x
20.4 cm ( 9 % x 8 in.) Platinum print
Film 81:1198:0045
S E C O N D M O U N T : 33.3 x 30.3 cm I M A G E : 24.4 x 19.4 cm (g /s 5
x y / 5
8 in.)
(13 Ys x n 1 5
/i6 in.) F I R S T M O U N T : 27 x 21 cm ( i 0 / s x814 5
in.)
L o s Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum S E C O N D M O U N T : 52.1 x 32.4 cm
84.XM.444.36 (20 V2 x 12% in.)
L o s Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
84.XM.444.20
156
PLATE LIST
PLATE 107
Bradford, England, R P S Collection at Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
A c r o s s t h e N a v e of D u r h a m [Cathedral],
the National Media Museum/ssPL RPS 84.XM.444.78
ca. 1912
Platinum print 2003-5001_2_22275 PLATE 119
I M A G E : 24.7 x 12.7 cm ( 9 % x 5 in.) D o r a C u r t i s , ca. 1895-1900
PLATE 113
M O U N T : 49 x 30.6 cm {IQVIG X 12 in.) Platinum print
A r t h u r Symons, ca. 1895-1900
Bradford, England, R P S Collection at the I M A G E : 18.7 x 13 cm (7 /s x 5% in.)
3
Platinum print
National Media M u s e u m / s s P L RPS 8023 F I R S T M O U N T : 25.5 x 17.3 cm (10 x 6 / I G in.) 1 3
(20/2 x i 2 / i c in.)u
A l v i n L a n g d o n C o b u r n , ca. 1900
D r . J o h n T o d h u n t e r , 1890 Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
Platinum print
Platinum print 84.XM.444.58
I M A G E : 19.3 x 14.5 cm (7 /s x 5 / i 6 in.)
5 n
F I R S T M O U N T : 21.5 x 15.9 cm
M O U N T : 34.9 x 26.2 cm (13% x I O / I G in.) 5
(syiGxe^in.)
L o s Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
S E C O N D M O U N T : 39.9 x 27.9 cm
84.XM.444.71
( i 5 / i 6 x 11 in.)
n
84.XM.444.59
Los Angeles, J . Paul Getty Museum
84.XM.444.65
157
A
158
INDEX
159
Lndex
160