Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CIR, v. Wellington Investment & Manufacturing Corporation
CIR, v. Wellington Investment & Manufacturing Corporation
FACTS:
On November 25, 2011, [Wellington] filed is letterprotest dated November 22, 2011 to the
Final Letter of Demand, duly stamped on even date by the BIR LT Regular Audit Division I.
Thereafter; on August 30, 2012, [Wellington] filed a Supplemental Protest. On October 8, 2013,
[Wellington] received the copy of the Final Decision on Disputed Assessment (FDDA) with
attached Details of Discrepancies.
ISSUE:
Petitioner did not make an assignment of errors. However, based on the discussion in his
Petition for Review, the CIR disagrees with the findings of the Court in Division with respect to
the assessments for income tax, value-added tax (VAT), withholding tax on compensation
(WTC), expanded withholding tax (EWT), and fringe benefit tax (FBT).
RULING:
The CIR states that tax assessments are entitled to the presumption of correctness and that the
same are made in good faith. It is further stated that the burden of proof is on the taxpayer
contesting the validity or correctness of an assessment.
However, as discussed above, the Decision dated September 14, 2017 and Resolution dated
January 10, 2018 in CTA Case No. 8726 are AFFIRMED WITH MODIFICATION.
authority.