Journal Article Review Grading Rubric | CEFS602_B01_202130

Criteria Ratings Points

Content - 35 to >31.0 pts 31 to >28.0 pts 28 to >0.0 pts 0 pts 35 pts

Summary
Advanced Proficient Developing Not
Present
• Summary is concisely worded • Summary is not The flow and rationale
(but of sufficient length in order to clearly stated. to answers is unclear
adequately provide a complete • Summary includes and illogical. Important
review of the article). • Summarymost of the major themes from the
includes all major topics of the topics of the article. scholarly
article (if the article is a research • Summary provides sources/Internet/media
study, briefly describes some foundation for exploration are missing.
hypotheses, methods, results, the subsequent 2 Major points are not
discussion, and implications). sections of paper. stated and not
• Summary is the foundation for • Article is chosen supported.
the subsequent 2 sections of from list provided or
paper. • Article is chosen from list
approved by professor.
provided or approved by
professor.

Content - 15 to >13.0 pts 13 to >12.0 pts 12 to >0.0 pts 0 pts 15 pts

Interaction
Advanced Proficient Developing Not
Present
Interaction includes an excellent: Interaction includes an Interaction includes a
• Initial response, • Commentsadequate: • Initial limited and inadequate:
about design/methodology (if response, • Initial response,
appropriate), • Insights gained, • Comments about • Comments about
• Reasons for your interest in design/methodology (if design/methodology (if
topic, • Missing concepts, and appropriate), • Insights
appropriate), • Insights
• Future research interest based gained, • Reasons forgained, • Reasons for
on topic. your interest in topic, your interest in topic,
• Missing concepts, • Missing concepts,
and/or • Future and/or • Future
research interest research interest based
based on topic. on topic.

Content - 25 to >22.0 pts 22 to >20.0 pts 20 to >0.0 pts 0 pts 25 pts

Application
Advanced Proficient Developing Not
Present
• Insightful Application of the • Adequate Application• Poorly developed
article’s core ideas to a specific of the article’s core Application of the
counseling situation specifically ideas to a specific article’s core ideas to a
addressing Case counseling situation specific counseling
Conceptualization, Clinical specifically addressing situation specifically
Assessment, and/or Treatment Case addressing Case
Planning (describe the scenario Conceptualization, Conceptualization,
and counseling issue). • Article’sClinical Assessment, Clinical Assessment,
ideas are clearly integrated, and/or Treatment and/or Treatment
applied, and cited. Planning (describe the Planning (describe the
scenario and scenario and
counseling issue). counseling issue).
• Article’s ideas are • Article’s ideas are
clearly integrated, clearly integrated,
applied, and cited. applied, and cited.
Journal Article Review Grading Rubric | CEFS602_B01_202130
Criteria Ratings Points

Mechanics 15 to >13.0 pts 13 to >12.0 pts 12 to >0.0 pts 0 pts 15 pts

Advanced Proficient Developing Not

Present
• The review meets the page • Few grammar, • Several grammar,
requirement of 3-5 pages. • No spelling, or punctuation spelling, or punctuation
grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. errors are present.
errors are present. Voice and Voice and person are Voice and person are
person are used correctly and used correctly. used inconsistently.
consistently. • Writing is precise.• Writing style is • Writing style is
Word choice is appropriate. sufficient. Word choice understandable but
• Spelling is correct is adequate. could be improved.
Word choice is
generally good.

APA 10 to >9.0 pts 9 to >7.0 pts 7 to >0.0 pts 0 pts 10 pts

Format
Elements Advanced Proficient Developing Not
Present
Citations and format are in current Citations and format Citations and format
APA style. Cover page, Citations, are in current APA are in current APA style
Running head, and References style with few errors. though several errors
are correctly formatted. Paper is Cover page, Citations, are present. Cover
double-spaced with 1-inch margins Running head, and page, Citations,
and written in APA-approved font References are Running head, and
style and size. An Abstract is not present with few References are
needed. errors. Paper is included though several
double-spaced with errors are present.
1-inch margins and Paper is
written in double-spaced, but
APA-approved font margins or fonts are
style and size. incorrect.

Total Points: 100