Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

CONTEMPT PETITION FOR COMMUTATION

ARREARS FILED – BEING FILED BY SBM COMMUNE

devulapallimurti@gmail.com 29 March 2020 at 18:34

TO: All my friends on the mailing list.

MY DEAR FRIENDS,

YOU ARE QUITE AWARE THAT SOME OF OUR COMRADES FROM


ANDHRA PRADESH ARE ALSO DIRECT PARTIES TO THE LITIGATION
AGAINST SYNDICATE BANK, AT THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT-
BANGALURU, FILED BY US IMMEDIATELY AFTER OUR RETIREMENTS
IN 2001 ITSELF.

THIS WAS UPHELD BY HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN ITS JUDGMENT


Dtd. 23FEB 23, 2018 .

THE ORDERS OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT WHICH WAS UPHELD BY


THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT AS STATED ABOVE , HAVE NOT BEEN
IMPLEMENTED BY THE BANK MANAGEMENTS EVEN AS ON THE
DATE, ON SOME PRETEXT OR THE OTHER.

THIS HAS NECESSITATED TO SEEK FURTHER LEGAL RECOURSE IN


THE FORM OF FILING "CONTEMPT PETITIONS" AGAINST SBI
MANAGEMENT , WHICH YOU ARE QUITE AWARE OF.

YOU ARE ALSO QUITE AWARE OF THE FACT THAT NOTICES OF


CONTEMPT HAVE ALREADY BEEN SEVERED ON ALL THE REMAINING
ERRING BANKS EARLY THIS YEAR ITSELF.
FURTHER COURSE OF ACTION IS NOW BEING CONTEMPLATED AS
DETAILED OUT HERE UNDER:

I ANNEX HERE THE COMMUNICATION THREAD FOR THE DETAILS


AND DISCUSSIONS RELATING TO THE CONTEMPT PETITION/S
ALREADY FILED / CONTEMPLATED TO BE FILED ON IMMEDIATE
REOPENING OF THE HIGH COURT (KARNATAKA- BANGALURU) AS
ALREADY INITIATED BY OUR LEARNED SENIOR COMRADE : SRI C N
PRASAD. THE RELEVANT ATTACHMENTS ARE ALSO ANNEXED
THERETO, FOR YOUR PERUSAL AND UNDERSTANDING.

IF ANYBODY WANTS TO SEEK FURTHER CLARIFICATION/S IF ANY ,


ARE WELCOME TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSION BY CLICKING
THE FOLLOWING LINK:
To view this discussion on the web visit :
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bankpensioner/CALXgLCEMwtUjs-
KVJgwWU6DPcnp%3DY4ZLOUsZSZQ%2Bv%3DKuBP196w%40mail.gmail.com.

I take this opportunity to profusely thank our learned senior


comrade Sri C N Prasad garu and his committed team of
"SBM COMMUNE" for all the initiative for our collective
cause.
With Greetings and Regards,

“||यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः ||”


IS THE ULTIMATE...... I remain - Yours,

దేవులపల్లి శ్రీనివాస మూర్త ి / Devulapalli Srinivasa Murti.


MARCH 29, 2020 VIJAYAWADA 521108

devulapallimurti@gmail.com 0866-2953298 :: 9989318300

Note: please ascertain and furnish the latest contact details of our
remaining co-petitioners for updation at my end.

QUOTE:
Srinivasa Murti Devulapalli <devulapallimurti@gmail.com>

bankpensioner Payment of Commutation and interest to 33 more


14 messages

SBMPC Blore <sbmpensioners@gmail.com> 26 March 2020 at 00:40

Reply-To: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com

Bcc: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com

Dear friends,

In addition to 615 of our members, on Saturday, State Bank of India has paid
interest on five years benefit and differential commutation. These 33 members
are not a part of Respondents in Supreme Court and they were also not covered
by Contempt Petition at Hon'ble Supreme Court.

Even before issue of notice in Contempt Petition, these pensioners have received
arrears. They also got 1% additional interest as Hon'ble High Court had allowed
10% interest whereas Supreme Court ordered 9% interest.

Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka has also issued notice to Shri Rajnish Kumar,
Chairman, State Bank of India. Perhaps, this Contempt Petition would also come
up for hearing immediately after Corona - 19 Lock-down ends. We would like to
bring to notice of our friends that our Commune continues to fight mighty State
Bank of India and also understand the consequences of such struggle. With the
support of our members, we are confident of succeeding in our struggle with
flying colours. This is just one among many issues, we are fighting.

Our Mysore Bank Shathayu for the month of March, 2020 is also attached.

Thanking you,
With warm regards,
Prasad C N
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CMDf8cYaZ_EvtCGx36rdNpw8X9ug43QK/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dhabLFdM0fmvcGbsS9qXeKd3yyjWLtNv/view?usp=sharing

26 March 2020 at
JSOMA SHEKARA <jsomasekara2007@gmail.com> 13:43

Reply-To: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com

To: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com

Thank you Sri.CN N Prasad. Such real struggle and genuine concern is very much need of
the nour and not drama like writing letters.

27 March 2020 at
mohan p <mohanp47@gmail.com> 10:26

Reply-To: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com

To: bankpensioner <bankpensioner@googlegroups.com>

Congratulations to Sri.Prasadji and his team once again, for securing benefits
from.SBI to further 33 pensioners,apart from 615 beneficiaries,though they were not
part of case in SC through long drawn legal battle.

27 March 2020 at
Srinivasa Murti Devulapalli <devulapallimurti@gmail.com> 12:05

To: Bankpensioner Google <bankpensioner@googlegroups.com>

My Dear Sri Prasad garu,

My hearty congratulations to you. I also wish you all the success in


your endevours in your CRUSADE ON THE LEGAL FRONT IN REST
OF THE CASES TOO.

d s murti
27 March 2020 at
KL Rao <contactklrao@gmail.com> 14:14

Reply-To: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com

To: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com

Awesome

27 March 2020 at
Pravin V <pdv2310@gmail.com> 17:59

Reply-To: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com

To: bankpensioner <bankpensioner@googlegroups.com>

Congratulations Shri Prasadji, Your untiring efforts are now


paying reward.

Great. Your untiring efforts have made mighty SBI to see the
reason and act positively. P D Vaidya

28 March 2020 at
RAMAKRISHNAN R P <ramakrishnan.rp@gmail.com> 09:05

Reply-To: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com

To: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com

Dear Friend's,

Pension should be given as per Pension Regulation 1995. Every Pensioner whether he is first
OPTEE or Second OPTEE , he is receiving pension and the pension is being paid on the basis
of Pension Regulation 1995. The PRE1995 CLEARLY MENTIONS THAT HOW A PENSION
SHOULD BE PAID. ON THAT BASIS ONLY WE ALL ACCEPTED TO GO FOR PENSION OPTION.
THE PRE1995 CLEARLY MENTIONS UNDER REGULATION 37 , HOW A D.A RELIEF SHOULD
BE CALCULATED AND BE PAID. DID IT NOT MENTION THAT THE D.A SHOULD BE PAID IN
ACCORDDACE WITH THE RATES SPECIFIED IN APPENDIX II. AS PER THE APPENDIX II , THE
RATE OF DEARNESS RELIEF AS A PERCENTAGE OF BASIC PENSION IS MENTIONED AS
1148 POINTS. THIS IS APPLICABLE TO ALL RETIREES WHO ARE RETIRED ON OR AFTER
THE IST DAY OF NOV'93. ARE THEY PAYING D.A AT THIS RATE. ??? NO NOT ALL PAYING
FROM THE DATE OF RETIREMENT. EVEN FOR THE SECOND OPTEES, THEY ARE ELIGIBLE .
ONCE THEY START PAYING PENSION MEANS THE BANKS AGREED TO PAY AS PER
PRE1995 ONLY. WHY BOTH THE ASSOCIATIONS ( AIBRF AND AIBPARA) ARE NOT EVEN
PUT FORTH THE D.A RELIEF DEMAND WITH THE BANKS . ACCORDING TO C.N.PRASADJI 'S
ANGEL , IF WE DO NOT CLAIM NOW , THE COURT MAY PRESUME THAT THE NON
CLAIMERS ARE HAPPY WITH THE PRESENT D.A slab system. Think my friends let us wake
up and let the Associations fight in the court along with SBI COMMUNES. IT IS NEED OF THE
HOUR. THINK MY FRIENDS.... WITH REGARDS,

I am forwarding this to all Pensioners.

RAMAKRISHNAN.RP., VRS RETIREE OF 2001, INDIAN BANK.

28 March 2020 at
Srinivasa Murti Devulapalli <devulapallimurti@gmail.com> 17:07

To: Bankpensioner Google <bankpensioner@googlegroups.com>

My Dear Sri Prasad garu,

From syndicate Bank, some of us are also direct litigants in the


case/s before Hon'ble High Court of Judicature, Karnataka filed in
2001. Kindly send me the vakalat forms . Also inform me the
amount need to be remitted along with the vakalat (Per Petitioner)

On hearing from you, I will come in person to sign the plaint/ petition
on behalf of my co-petitioners if need be.
I look forward to hearing from you in this regard.

Kindly advise me in the matter.

Regards,
D S Murti

9989318300 (Whats-app)

d s murti

28 March 2020 at
Nagaraju Kakani <rajageethi@gmail.com> 15:18

Reply-To: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com

To: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com
Sairam, Thank you Sir for your clarity on the payment of pension, Date of retirement,
DA Rate etc.

Sir, I took SVRS from BOI in 2000 Dec.,fore going all benefits like any other
superannuated employee , except the 52 months exgratia paid for my 26 years of
completed service, in lieu of fore going my 7 years left over service (80 months) at
that time (which has value of my fringe benefits, future increments, increase in wages
due to bi partiates etc).

In 2009 ,Opted for pension with fond hope the banks will do justice for the loss
suffered by all the SVRS retirees..

Instead the Bank, gave benefit of 1.Pension from 2009 Nov, 2. Tapering DA as of
pension option date. 3.Commutation from date of request considering factor for the
present age instead of retirement age. 4.Ignored Pee 2002 retirees for 100% DA.

The other injustices to all retirees after the several BPS commencing from 8 th in
wards especially in 10 th BPS with Record Note.

The impact and affect of all the injustices is known to every body now.

I am drawing partial pension based on my 26 years service plus 5 yrs notional benefit
though but the bank ignored the service fact for giving the benefit of REMAS.

Bhagawan only has to bless us, for any improvement in pension and the benefits at
far with RBI and Central Government.

Let us wait and see what is in store for us after this COVID 19 Calamity.

With regards,

Kakani Nagaraju,

BOI 2000 SVRS/2009 Pensioner,

Malkajgiri, Hyderabad.

28 March 2020 at
11:01
Prasad C N' via bankpensioner <bankpensioner@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com

To: bankpensioner@googlegroups.com
Dear Shri Ramakrishnan,

At the outset, I would like to clarify that we are taking the issue of
payment of Dearness Relief in terms of Regulation 37, as a part of
Contempt Petition to be filed immediately after reopening of
Hon'ble Supreme Court, by All India Bank Retired Employees'
Association, which is a party in Civil Appeals connected with Civil
Appeal 5525/2012 - Bank of Baroda Vs. G Palani's case. We have
enough grounds and material to succeed in Contempt Case. In
case, we do not succeed in Contempt Petition, still we are ensuring
that delay and latches would not be applicable.

We have spent good amount of money in keeping the issue of


payment of interest alive by filing a Miscellaneous Petition. We are
attaching a copy of order. On account of this order, we are
confident of getting even the interest on arrears. We are taking
every step with foresight.

Contempt Petition filed against Bank of Baroda by former Officers


of Vijaya Bank was listed for hearing on 20.03.2020. Unfortunately,
on account of Corona's effect, hearing is deferred. So far, Bank of
Baroda has not responded to notice by Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Perhaps, they may do so before next date of hearing.

Leave apart the benefit under Regulation 37, please go through the
circulars/letters of these so called Apex organisations. None of
them even have a mention of order of Supreme Court dated
28.8.2019 in our Contempt Petition.

Thanks, a Million.

With regards,

Prasad C N

You might also like