Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2017 LHC 769
2017 LHC 769
2017 LHC 769
HJD/C -42
(Revised: under Act No.II of 1990)
Case No.
Title
Title
Title
Deaided on 06.02.2017
JUDGE
liignature
Judgment Sheet
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
ii\
4. Heard.
5. I
Mst'Pathani has specifically stated that she
PW-
was daughter of Ali Muhammad, and that Mst.sharam
Bibi
and Allah Diwaya were legal heirs of Ali Muhammad-
deceased. After death of her father, her brother (petitioner
No.l) was looking after his revenue estate and used to give
them produde of land. Three years back on consultation
of
revenue record she came to know that she and her sister
sharam Bibi-deceased had been deprived of the
revenue estate 4.
of their father. During cross examination she being illiterate
?ardanasheen' lady, due to slip of tongue made
a bald
statement that Yaqoob Ahmad rvas father of
Ari Muhammad
(whereas actual parentage of Ali Muhammad
is Muhammad
Bakhsh). she specificaly stated that present petitioner
No.l
was her younger brother. she denied the suggestion
that the
petitioner No.1 was not her brother and he had
never paid any
produce to her. Pw-2 Azeem Bakhsh deposed that pathani,
Mst. sharam Khatoon and Allah Diwaya are son and daughters
of Ali Muhammad and as such are entitled to inherit revenue
estate left by Ali Muhammad deceased. He deposed that Mst.
0-
Civil Reyision No.4I-D of 2009
.li
Civil Revision No.47-D of 2009
yV >-t2
{\
-L