Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TC1269-ed.01 Incidents 5814, 5815 and 581
TC1269-ed.01 Incidents 5814, 5815 and 581
01
URGENT
CONTENTS
5. CONCLUSION .............................................................................6
1
2
OmniPCX Enterprise
INCIDENTS 5814, 5815 AND 5816
(FAILURE IN SIP COMPONENT)
The sipalarm.log is the file containing the last incidents, the others are stored.
• If sipalarm.log is full, its content is put in sipalarm1.log.
• If sipalarm.log is full and sipalarm1.log is already created, its content is put in
sipmalarm2.log.
• …
• If sipalarm.log is full and sipalarm9.log is already created, its contain is put in
sipalarm1.log (deleting the old contain)
3. EXAMPLE OF INCIDENTS
After we check the sipalarm files to find the corresponding entry according to the date and time
incident creation and get the next information:
• The incident severity is "Minor", which means that the problem does not affect the proper
functioning of the SIP in the OmniPCX Enterprise.
• The Call-ID "61e850385888d87cf8deb9063c062548@172.27.141.151", which allows to
link with a trace motortrace or "wireshark" type, to find out which exchanges are associated
with this SIP incident.
• The equipment number "eqt : 1487" which corresponds in this case to SIP ISDN TG, with this
information, we are able to more easily identifying the SIP equipment involved for the
incident.
• The last information, after the equipment number, give us the incident cause, for instance
"PROCEEDING_STATE received a message", the "PROCEEDING" corresponds to call
establishment phase of a SIP communication. In that case, on a receiving message, the "tag"
doesn’t correspond to a call in progress (call terminated or existent).
Sipalarm:
> 07/03/09 - 11:54:24 Minor alarm
[receiveInviteEvent] Call: eqt: 10567 INITIAL_STATE failed to emit an Invite
message.
If we look at well the message corresponding in the sipalarm.log file, the problem is that the
OmniPCX Enterprise could not send an INVITE, which in itself is not considered a major incident.
The problem was that the RASFO (callback on busy TG) was validated in OmniPCX Enterprise, which
is strictly prohibited.
• tuner km
• tuner clear-traces
• tuner hybrid=on
• tuner +at
• actdbg sip=on csip=on abcf=on ei=on
• mtracer –a > "Name_of_the_file.log"
• Do Ctrl-c to stop the trace
• tuner km
We can adapt the choices on actdbg according to the call type, if it is a SIP Device, we don’t need to
use ei=on for instance, etc…
4.2 On SIPMOTOR
• motortrace 3
• traced > "Name_of_the_file.log"
• Do Ctrl-c to stop the trace
We can used "motortrace 6" if a DNS configuration is done for the SIP call.
Send the traces to Alcatel-Lucent for analyses, by adding the incidents (incvisu command) and all the
sipalarm files under /tmpd/, specify each time the calling/called number, the IP addresses of the
different equipments involved in that call, then the contains of the command "motortrace c".
5. CONCLUSION
When these incidents appear on the OmniPCX Enterprise, a minimum of analyses can be done
thanks to the sipalarm files, id these incidents disturb the proper functioning of the SIP, it is important
to make the requested traces, by adapting them according to the type of calls and to transmit them
via an opened SR for deeper analyses.
The SIP traces given can be done every time when you have SIP issue.