Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS

Quality assurance describes all activities related to establishing, maintaining


and assuring high quality care for patients. Quality assurance process is the
systematic process of evaluating the quality of care given in a particular unit or
institution. It involves setting standards, determining criteria to meet those
standards, data collection, evaluating how well the criteria have been met,
making plans for change based on the evaluation, and follow up on
implementation for change.
Components of Quality Assurance
Setting Standards
The nursing profession should have to design standards of nursing practice that
are specific to the patient population served (for example, the American Nurses
Association has set up a Standards of Nursing Practice based on nursing process).
These standards could serve as the foundation upon which all other measures of
quality assurance are based. An example of a standard is: Every patient will have a
written care plan.
Determining Criteria
After standards of performance are established, criteria must be determined that
will indicate if the standards are being met and to what degree they are met. Just
as with standards of care, criteria must be general as well as specific to the
individual unit. One criterion to demonstrate that the standards regarding care
plans for every patient are being met would be: A nursing care plan is developed
and written by a nurse within 12 hours of admission. This criterion, then, provides
a measurable indicator to evaluate performance.
Data Collection
The actual collection of data is the third step in quality assurance. Sufficient
observations and random samples are necessary for producing reliable and valid
information. A useful rule is that 10 percent of the institutional patient population
per month should be sampled. The devised tool to collect data should leave as
little room for interpretation by the data collector as possible. Data collectors
need to be taught the purpose of quality assurance along with the principles of
data collection. Data collection methods include patient observations and
interviews, nurse observations and interviews, and review of charts. Flow sheets
and Kardexes are also resources from which to assemble information about past
and present conditions.
Evaluating Performance
Several methods can be used to evaluate performance. These include reviewing
documented records, observing activities as they take place, examining patients,
and interviewing patients, families, and staff. Records are the most commonly
used source for evaluation because of the relative ease of their use, but they are
not as reliable as direct observations. It is quite possible to write in the patient’s
chart activities that were not done or not to record those things that were done.
Further, the chart only indicates that care was provided; it does not demonstrate
the quality of that care. For example, care plan could be checked,nursing
diagnosis, interventions planned, and discharge planning.
Monitoring Nursing Care
In addition to the individual patient care activities described, another component
of quality assurance is the ongoing monitoring of nursing care. Several methods
are used to monitor nursing care. These include the nursing audit, peer review,
utilization review, and patient satisfaction.
 Nursing audit
Nursing audit is defined as part of the cycle of quality assurance. It
incorporates the systematic and critical analysis by nurses, midwives and health
visitors, in conjunction with other staff, of the planning, delivery and evaluation of
nursing and midwifery care, in terms of their use of resources and the outcomes
for patients/clients, and introduces appropriate change in response to that
analysis (NHS ME, 1991 Framework for Audit for Nursing Services).
Nursing Audit can be retrospective or concurrent. A retrospective audit is
conducted after a patient’s discharge and involves examining records of a large
number of cases. The patients’ entire course of care is evaluated and comparisons
made across cases. Recommendations for change can be made from the
perspective of many patients with similar care problems and with the spectrum of
care considered. A concurrent audit is conducted during the patient’s course of
care; it examines the care being given to achieve a desirable outcome in the
patient’s health and evaluates the nursing care activities bearing provided.
Changes can be made if they are indicated by patient outcomes.
 Peer Review
Occurs when practicing nurses determine the standards and criteria that indicate
quality care and then assess performance against these. In this case, nurses and
midwives are the “experts” at knowing what the indicators of quality care and
when such care has been provided.
 Patient Satisfaction.
It is using a questionnaire and asking the patient to fill out before leaving the
institution. Such questionnaire includes care given in a timely fashion and other
variables in the environment that contribute to recovery rather than standards of
professional care.

You might also like