Professional Documents
Culture Documents
03 Minewater 1 Lectures 10
03 Minewater 1 Lectures 10
03 Minewater 1 Lectures 10
1
Tar Creek site in Oklahoma http://ouwatercenter.blogspot.com/.
Passive
treatment
technologies
2
Tar Creek site in Oklahoma http://ouwatercenter.blogspot.com/.
Assignment
Get some comments about your picture from the group (30 seconds)
• Neutralization by carbonates
Both acidity and alkalinity are generally expressed as a CaCO3 equivalent mass https://de.123rf.com/photo_114627608
6
converted to concentration or loading.
(Kirby and Cravotta 2005a, b)
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
• Water chemistry
• Flow rate
• Local topography
• Site characteristics
• Other important parameters
DO : Dissolved Oxygen
RAPS : Reducing and alkalinity producing system
ALD : Anoxic limestone drain
OLC : Open Limestone channel 7
SRB : Sulfur reducing bacteria
(Modified after Hedin et al. 1994a and Skousen et al 1998, 2017)
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
• Water chemistry
• Flow rate
• Local topography
• Site characteristics
• Other important parameters
DO : Dissolved Oxygen
RAPS : Reducing and alkalinity producing system
ALD : Anoxic limestone drain
OLC : Open Limestone channel 8
SRB : Sulfur reducing bacteria
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
Passive systems are very robust and hard to destroy physically, whereas active systems are prone to be subject to
vandalism or even equipment/metal theft or “salvaging” (particularly relevant in economies where people are poor).
Maintenance of a passive system is easy and requires no professional personnel, which creates possibilities for
community involvement at the actual site.
The economic structure of passive systems facilitates external funding. Donors can easier be motivated to support a
project with relatively finite costs (system implementation) rather than to support a project where financial input has
to be distributed over 20 years or more (system operation).
Many passive systems, (e.g. in particular wetland type systems), can add significant amenity value to an area and
contribute to the tourist or community usage value of an area as well as to the ecological/biodiversity value by
9
providing a wildlife habitat.
Tremblay & Davé, (2007)
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
10
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
cells Modified from Wildeman et al. 1993, Kadlec & Wallace 2008, mineclosure.gtk © GTK 2014
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
12
(Modified from Wallace & Knight 2006, Vymazal 2010, mineclosure.gtk © GTK 2014)
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
13
(Modified from mineclosure.gtk © GTK 2014)
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
The cross section of ALD system. (Adapted from e.g. Hedin et al. 1994a, Skousen et al. 1998). mineclosure.gtk © GTK
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
In anoxic conditions
Fe3+ Fe2+
Anaerobic microbes
Al3+ Al(OH)3
SO42- S2-
15
It was based on a
1. Selective precipitation/-flocculation process (uranium adsorption on a polymeric flocculent)
2. Co-precipitation of radium
3. Arsenic removal via FeCl3
4. Iron and manganese oxidation
5. Sludge dewatering and disposal in dry parts of the mine
Soon after the commissioning of the plant, it became clear that for long-term treatment, a passive or semi-
passive alternative is desirable. After the installation of a pilot treatment plant, the concept for a full-scale
application was developed and implemented.
16
(Kunze et al. 2007)
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
18
(Kunze et al. 2007)
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
1. Aeration cascade
2. Settlement pond
3. Pond with floating mats
4. Pond with Characeae algae
5. Polishing pond
6. Adsorption filters
1. Aeration cascade
2. Settlement pond
3. Pond with floating mats
4. Pond with Characeae algae
5. Polishing pond
6. Adsorption filters
20
(Kunze et al. 2007)
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
1. Aeration cascade
2. Settlement pond
3. Pond with floating mats
4. Pond with Characeae algae
5. Polishing pond
6. Adsorption filters
21
Tremblay & Davé, (2007)
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
On a yearly basis, the system manages to remove 1400 kg of iron, 300 kg of arsenic and 600 MBq of radium.
Operating cost for the first years of passive operation: approximately 2 EUR/m3
Operating cost for long-term, steady passive operation: approximately 1 - 1.50 EUR/m3
22
(Kunze et al. 2007)
Mine water 1 - Theory and application
23
Questions?