1

The Evaluation and Measurement of Library Services

Student’s Name

Institution’s Affiliation

Professor’s Name

Date
 2

Introduction

As the notion of public library space as a service gained traction, library information

managers realized the need for new tools and methodologies to evaluate unique library

institutions in addition to existing library evaluation activities. Space assessment and evaluation

efforts have progressed from routine qualifies and concern in particular customer satisfaction

survey to more detailed aimed qualitative approach, such as observational research, filmed

interjections, qualitative evaluations, and reviewing the job description, with faculty members as

well as other stakeholders frequently involved as partners in the process (Corrall, 2017).

Although several library assessment methods have been created, few have attempted to

review the performance measures. This thesis is a meta-evaluation, which means it evaluates

prior assessments. The advantages and disadvantages of various evaluation methods are

discussed. The links between the multiple forms of assessment are then discovered, and a library

evaluation meta-model is developed. Library service assessment should be viewed as a managed

service, used to evaluate how quickly and successfully the public library meets the requirements

of its customers, discover service limitations and failures, and propose methods to enhance such

service (Markauskaite & Goodyear, 2017). The extent to whom the recipient's requirements are

satisfied is determined by the public library’s magnitude and compilation, the sufficiency and

precision of its content institution, the effectiveness of its collections and discovering tools in

giving access to its reader, and the willingness and cooperation of the library staff in trying to

bring such components to the awareness of the clients and optimizing the visibility of its

collection. Some parts of public library service are more straightforward to assess than others. In

speaking, the more specific or exact the user needs, the simpler it is to determine complete

customer satisfaction.
 3

The extent to which the public library is being used represents user satisfaction, which

can be quantified through topics discussed such as interviews and questionnaires. Through more

impartial, quantitative methods such as proportion estimations and control values perseverance,

among other things. The search for exemplary methods of assessing customer satisfaction

(quantifying methods) must, nevertheless, begin with examining the roles of a "good library,"

what features are essential to measuring, or if the statistics derived from the quantification will

be appropriate and helpful to determine the library's usefulness or ineptness (Corrall, 2017). An

overview of the literature on public library efficiency reveals a significant lack of consensus

about what the idea of effectiveness implies. The present state of study on the issue reflects this

absence of a cohesive conception of efficacy. From the numerous theoretical perspectives

offered, just a few cohesive paths of inquiry have emerged. There is debate over what factors

should be reviewed to assess effectiveness, who should develop research objectives, and how

efficiency and performance should be utilized.

Literature Review

According to the PACU-COA declaration, the essential feature of an excellent public

library is its affiliation with the institution. “The amount to which those assets, services, and

infrastructure complement the institution's aims is the measure of excellence’ (AlAwadhi & Al-

Daihani, 2019). Consequently, the public library's responsibilities are essential to act as the

faculty's educational arm, promote autonomous intellectual growth, and assist in well-rounded

higher learning. Different perspectives on the structure of public libraries have been at the root of

conceptual disputes. Each point of view, consciously or unconsciously, influences the

performance standards used to design and measure the efficacy of the library. As one means of

investigating these many conceptual frameworks, three critical perspectives on the structure of
 4

public libraries will be examined later. The objective approach will be discussed first,

accompanied by explanations of the process and structural methods. Reviewing the literature on

public library efficiency reveals a wide range of assessment criteria. The goal method may be the

most commonly used assessment mechanism, in which library performance is related to how

much the library, as a centralized monarchy, accomplishes its aims.

Measuring public library efficacy has become associated with determining the degree to

which goals have been met. In the library literature, there are various variants on this topic. Any

efforts to reference every publication that includes the word aim would be futile in addressing

these variances (Emezie & Nwaohiri, 2017). As a result, this study will examine just a few

publications whose perspectives contribute to perspectives and indicate trends in the field. One

of the most helpful concepts distinguishes between written assertions used to establish public

library goals and performance measurement used to assess particular library outputs. Public

Library objectives pertain to the ultimate result of library usage (for example, individual self-

development, happiness, and so on). In contrast, performance measurements refer to more visible

and quantifiable library operations. These goal theories and models are connected, although they

are at distinct levels of analysis.

Emezie & Nwaohiri's (2017) article describes a test meant to assess a public library's

capacity to provide document delivery and collection management services. A random sample of

300 items was drawn from a vast pool of materials often referenced by scholars. Each of the 18

possible results of a search is converted into an assessment of how long it will take a user to get

in the test. The test yielded a Capability Index, which runs from 100 (i.e., if a person might

acquire all of the objects in the search pool in 10 minutes or fewer) to 0 if none could've been

retrieved (Emezie & Nwaohiri, 2017). This Index appears to be more valid than the standard
 5

volume count for assessing a library's collection since it represents the differential value of a

resource most probably to be requested by the library's user community.

According to Hoover (2018), a random sample study can also be used to assess the

accuracy of public library records, the state of books in the collection, or the conduct or opinions

of library customers, among other topics or concerns in gauging library quality. The individual

performing the research does not need to have any specific mathematical skill or statistical

expertise to use this approach. This essay covers the idea of accuracy and includes a chart to help

you choose an acceptable sampling size. It also demonstrates a way for picking a sample based

on random integers (Hoover, 2018). It also offers three instances to illustrate how the method

may be used to public library difficulties.

Another approach of evaluation that is gaining traction in the literature is systems

analysis. "It begs the question why systems statistical tools, which are so useful in the creation of

data systems inherently, are not used to the establishment of tools for assessing comparable

systems." The majority of system studies are currently being conducted in connection with

enhanced information access and distribution strategies (Jordan, 2017). This contains a large

number of applicability evaluations that focus on a single element of a specialized system. The

majority of the research has been done on an individualized level, with no defined

methodologies. They may or may not be founded on functional requirements. Only a few studies

have been concerned with issues of the traditional library system. Development environment

studies in technical processing, for instance, have also been conducted. At this stage, it is

preferable to consider the public library as a whole. This article recommends assessing the public

library system based on its function related to usage, i.e., its performance management system
 6

(Klain & Shoham, 2019). It analyzes several evaluation methodologies and suggests what sorts

of data should also be collected.

This research aimed to provide a technique for assessing benefits and criteria services for

qualitative management in university libraries. This approach may be used to evaluate social or

"unquantifiable" advantages in any circumstance where a configuration engine can be created

with simply a benefit criterion. Extensive surveys of public library usage and consumers were

conducted at the universities of Durham and Newcastle-upon-Tyne, primarily utilizing the

project team's "immediate diary" approach. The data, which has now been examined in various

ways to fulfill the project's aims, yields one of its most comprehensive sets of statistics about

public library use (Matthews, 2017). The “instant diary” technique requires users to find public

library services on a survey card while in the library, which is then returned to the survey team

upon leaving. Another method of data gathering is a postal questionnaire survey, as mentioned in

Monitoring the Effectiveness of Public Library Service.

The survey questionnaire includes items on the different types of users of even an

academic department, years of employment in the organization, the primary subject of work, the

severity of library visit, objective(s) in visiting the library, library materials used, percentage of

excellence in locating the necessary materials, and physical state of the material properties. The

user feedback may be used to evaluate which sections of the public library need to be improved.

The objective aims to provide a user-friendly approach. This technique assesses the quality and

breadth of services provided by utilizing an inventory checklist administered during an interview

with a representative of the public library's staff (Yoon & Schultz, 2017). This is a never-ending

process of self-evaluation.
 7

This study examines organizational performance from three aspects: first, from theory to

practice; second, model application; and third, future developments in measuring performance. It

also includes a bibliography of books and papers on the subject and relevant approaches or

techniques. This is an introductory guidebook on library assessment, with twenty "core" articles

as well as an annotated bibliography that gives complete literature on the subject, with the goal

of "providing a greater sense of perspective for an essential area of library management."

Concepts and Theories of Library Space

Several of these ideas are based on Ray Oldenburg's 1989 work The Great Good Place,

which outlines the philosophy of the third place. As a result, Oldenburg's notion will be

discussed first. The public-private divide underpins all Western concepts of social space. Since

antiquity, the private sphere seems to have been distinct from the public world, with its own set

of constraints and liberties. The personal household is a haven for the family, shielded against

illegal entry by governmental officials. It is the reproductive space governed by the nuclear

family, primarily the family patriarch. Members of the family were not just blood relations until

contemporary times, but all individuals were subjected to the patriarch (Kumari & Thapliyal,

2017).

Freeman highlights the library's psychological and symbolic elements for the entire

school community and the educational setting. Religious communions are generally connected

with affiliation with a shared mission and a sense of belonging. The primary conclusion of this

study is that students respect the library and its resources more when the facility has a 'classical'

design linked with religion or church architecture. Public libraries are much less likely to instill

sentiments of affiliation with society and its objectives and objectives (Corrall, 2017).
 8

Another view of the library as a location connected with identity is the community space, which

Gayton proposed in his 2008 essay Academic Libraries: Is it better to use the words "social" or

"communal"? Quiet study in the company of others defines the library's common area. People

imagine themselves as members of a student as well as a scholar community. This emotion is

elicited not by chatting to one another and working together but by the mere presence of other

people in the same area (Corrall, 2017). Gayton is not the first to describe communal space, but he

expands on it by comparing it to social freedom.

Learning has evolved from the teaching of children and young people to a lifelong activity inside

the information society setting. As a result, self-paced and unstructured learning has grown in

importance over the last few decades, as has study in groups — formally or informally.

Case Study: Elmhurst Public Library

This study will be carried out based on a conceptual framework for measuring and

comprehending service quality in public libraries using a needs assessment. We shall investigate

using a data collecting technique similar to, but not identical to, the SERVQUAL instrument.

From earlier investigations, it was realized that the study required a bridge to experience. The

library managers needed a pool of observations and a means for disseminating them to assist

them in evaluating the service quality in their libraries.

Several phases will be included in the assessment process. The first and arguably most

crucial step is to plan ahead of time. Making a strategy allows you to regulate the scope of the

evaluation and to make it less scary. It is possible to manage how much work is done anyone at

one moment by creating or outlining a plan. This will also convince employees that
 9

implementing evaluation into their routine will not be difficult. An evaluation strategy will be

most successful if it satisfies the three requirements listed below: (1) retaining a focus on

activities for growth or change, (2) maintaining the plan moving at a sustainable speed, and (2)

avoiding or resolving any roadblocks to the evaluation process.

Methods

An exploratory qualitative descriptive correlational study design was employed in the

investigation. A literature review on public library space was a significant aspect: the survey's

research results notified the information of the learning module and assessment guidelines that

presented students to the subject matter, and the literature was often used to reinterpret the results

of their work, along with the methodologies they used (Matthews, 2017). The teacher graded the

project files throughout the term in line with both the objectives identified. They were then

evaluated after the period for the case study. The significant questions investigated were;

1. How does the public frame their space assessments?

2. What evaluation criteria do they choose and use?

The instructor tracked participants' progress via the assignment's various stages, offering

constructive comments as needed to ensure that individual projects were doable but not

influencing their core approach.

Conclusions

The examination of library spaces has progressed from a simple quantitative

determination of utilization to a complete qualitative assessment of the user experience. Another

significant aspect of the existing process is introducing toolkits and equitable participation as

community services capable of supporting comparative research and comparisons. Additional

 10

space investigations have used surveys, interviews, inspections, and pictures to collect data from

undergraduate and graduate students to determine requirements and desires. The current study

takes a new look at the desired features of spaces by investigating how public librarianship

learners, as undergraduate library users and then the following professionals, describe

assessment criteria. The faculty in the research used assessment criteria that were taken from or

comparable to criteria available in the research literature, and they all collected data primarily

through observation.

Even though they used various methodologies, their organizational culture many

prevalent issues and needs, as exemplified by the main categories and individual parts they chose

to frame their assessment, with access, usability, connectivity, security, and innovations are

emerging as central themes. There were discrepancies in the items selected for a remark in their

reports outside the present study's focus. Still, they imply possible variances (or different

expectations) in professional and personal beliefs that would have been interesting to investigate

in future studies (Matthews, 2017). As a result, evaluating service quality would guide policy

decisions.

References

AlAwadhi, S., & Al-Daihani, S. M. (2019). Marketing academic library information services
using social media. Library Management.
Corrall, S. (2017). Library space assessment: a professional education case study. Performance
Measurement and Metrics.

Emezie, N. A., & Nwaohiri, N. M. (2017). Social network as the enabler for library services:
challenges of Nigerian academic libraries. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in
Libraries, 5(1).
Hoover, J. (2018). Gaps in IT and library services at small academic libraries in
Canada. Information Technology and Libraries, 37(4), 15-26.
Jordan, P. (2017). The academic library and its users. Routledge.
 11

Klain Gabbay, L., & Shoham, S. (2019). The role of academic libraries in research and
teaching. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(3), 721-736.
Kumari, P., & Thapliyal, S. (2017). Studying the impact of organizational citizenship behavior
on organizational effectiveness. Human Resource Management, 4(1), 9-21.
Matthews, J. R. (2017). The evaluation and measurement of library services. ABC-CLIO.
Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2017). Epistemic fluency and professional education. Dordrecht:
Springer.

Yoon, A., & Schultz, T. (2017). Research data management services in academic libraries in the
US: A content analysis of libraries’ websites.