Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GEM 601 Syllabus Ver 2016 2nd Sem
GEM 601 Syllabus Ver 2016 2nd Sem
GEM 601 Syllabus Ver 2016 2nd Sem
COURSE SYLLABUS
2nd Semester, AY 2016-2017
ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOMES
As evidence of having achieved the outcomes, you must successfully do examination tasks.
Formative Summative
Exercise Sets, Short Quizzes, Long Tests Comprehensive Final Exam
Each final examination item will test all three outcomes (setting up model solving the model interpreting
solution). The rating you get for each item will be based on the rubric found in the Annex.
Grading System
Your grade for the course is computed based on both formative and summative assessment data. The assigned
weights to the assessment tasks and the computation of the course grade are detailed below.
Grade Component Weight Computation
Short Quizzes (SQ) (5%) SQ Average Grade x 0.05
Long Tests (LT) (25%) LT Average Grade x 0.25
Comprehensive Final Exam (CFE) (70%) CFE Grade x 0.70
Total Grade
Passing Grade: 3.0
LEARNING PLAN
Course
Topics Week Learning Activities
Outcome
Course Syllabus Getting organized for the semester
--- 1
Getting oriented to the course outcomes
Review of Fundamental Mathematical Concepts Reviewing topics in undergraduate math
--- Functions 2
Solutions of Ordinary Differential Equations
© Department of Chemical Engineering, University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines Page 1
Fourier Series Reading: Zill & Wright (p. 627-641)
Orthogonal Functions Doing Exercise Sets
CO2 3
Fourier Series Short Quiz
Fourier Cosine and Sine Series
Boundary-Value Problems in Rectangular Reading: Zill & Wright (p. 661-663, 664-
Coordinates 668)
CO1 Deriving the Wave Equation and the Heat Doing Exercise Sets
4
CO2 Equations
Classifying PDEs
Method of Separation of Variables
Wave Problems Reading: Zill & Wright (p. 669-671, 672-
CO1
Heat Conduction Problems (Homogeneous 674, 677-680)
CO2 5
Cases) Doing Exercise Sets
CO3
Short Quiz
Sturm-Liouville Problem Reading: Zill & Wright (p. 646-652)
CO1 Wave & Heat Conduction Problems 6 Doing Exercise Sets
CO2 - Nonhomogeneous Cases Short Quiz
CO3 - Orthogonal Series Expansions Reading: Zill & Wright (p. 682-687, 688-
- Double Fourier Series 7 690)
Doing Exercise Sets
CO1 Recap on BVP in Rectangular Coordinates Preparing for Long Test 1
CO2 LONG TEST 1 8
CO3
Series Solutions of Linear Differential Equations Reading: Zill & Wright (p. 242-258)
CO2 Solutions about Ordinary Points 9 Doing Exercise Sets
Solutions about Singular Points Short Quiz
Bessel Functions Reading: Zill & Wright (p. 260-269)
CO2 Legendre Functions 10 Doing Exercise Sets
Short Quiz
Fourier-Bessel Series Reading: Zill & Wright (p. 646-652; 653-
Fourier-Legendre Series 657)
CO2 11
Doing Exercise Sets
Short Quiz
Boundary-Value Problems in Other Coordinate Reading: Zill & Wright (p. 698-701, 702-
CO1 Systems 707, 709-710)
CO2 12
Polar Coordinates Doing Exercise Sets
CO3
Cylindrical Coordinates Short Quiz
CO1 Spherical Coordinates Preparing for Long Test 2
CO2 13
CO3 LONG TEST 2
Integral Transform Method Reviewing Laplace Transform Method for
CO1 Solving BVP by Laplace Transform solving ODE IVP’s
CO2 14 Reading: Zill & Wright (p. 715-721)
CO3 Doing Exercise Sets
Short Quiz
Fourier Integral & Fourier Transforms Reviewing Laplace Transform Method for
Solving BVP by Fourier Transforms solving ODE IVP’s
CO1
Reading: Zill & Wright (p. 724-728, 729-
CO2 15
733)
CO3
Doing Exercise Sets
Short Quiz
CO1 Recap on BVP in Other Coordinate Systems & Preparing for Long Test 3
CO2 on Integral Transform Method 16
CO3 Long Test 3
Study Week 17 Preparing for Final Exams
CO3
CO4
Comprehensive Final Examinations 18
© Department of Chemical Engineering, University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines Page 2
Learning Resources
Books. The following books and many others are available at the Learning Resource Center:
Kreyzig, E. Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 10th ed, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2011)
O’Neil, P. V. Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 7th ed, Cengage Learning, Stamford (2012)
Wylie, C. R and Barrett, L. C. Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 6th ed, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York (1995)
Zill, D. G. and Wright, W. S. Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 4th ed, Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury, Mass. (2011)
Prepared by Approved by
Engr. Luis K. Cabatingan Dr. Evelyn B. Taboada
Associate Professor, ChE Dept. SOE Dean
Date Submitted Date Approved
for Approval
© Department of Chemical Engineering, University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines Page 3
ANNEX: Rubric for Evaluating Final Exam Tasks
Level 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
Criteria Outstanding Competent Marginal Not Acceptable
Content
Mathematical model is Mathematical model is Mathematical model is Development of the
developed from a clear developed from a clear developed from a vague mathematical model
and detailed description and detailed description and sketchy description does not show clear
Setting Up the of the situation; of the situation; of the situation; connection with the
Model appropriate principles appropriate principles appropriate principles description of the
(30%) are correctly applied in a are applied with only are applied with minor situation, and mistakes
highly logical manner minor logical flaws that logical flaws that do not in the application of
towards the model do not cause major cause major errors in relevant principles are
equation. errors in the model the model equation. present.
equation.
The solution process is The solution process is The solution process is An insignificant amount
worked out to worked out to worked out partially and of solution process is
completion, the steps completion, the steps the steps shown are made and/or the steps
shown are well-detailed shown are well-detailed correct and could shown are
Solving the Model and mathematically and mathematically potentially lead to a mathematically wrong,
(50%) error-free, and the final error-free; the final result correct result if worked irrelevant or
result is correct and is correct but still through. inappropriate.
expressed in its required requires one or two step
simplest form. to bring it to it required
simplest form.
Makes correct and Makes correct but Interpretation evidences Interpretation is totally
thorough interpretations incomplete interpretation limited ability to tie up irrelevant.
of the solution of the solution; the meaning of the
Interpretations evidencing a deep interpretation does not solution to the behavior
understanding of the consider full the model of the system under
(20%) behavior of the modeled assumptions. study.
system; and clearly
indicates how the model
assumptions limit the
predictions.
© Department of Chemical Engineering, University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines Page 4