Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bhel - Transformers-Tata McGraw-Hill Education (2003)
Bhel - Transformers-Tata McGraw-Hill Education (2003)
Bhel - Transformers-Tata McGraw-Hill Education (2003)
Second Edition
C HAPTER 29
About BHEL
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL) is the largest engineering and manufac-
turing enterprise of its kind in India and is one of the leading international compa-
nies in the field of power equipment manufacture. The first plant of BHEL was set
up at Bhopal in 1956, and currently its range of services extend from project
feasibility studies to after-sales service, successfully meeting diverse needs
through turnkey capability. The company has 14 manufacturing units, 4 power
sector regional centres, 8 service centres and 18 regional offices besides project
sites spread all over India and abroad.
BHEL manufactures over 180 products under 30 major product groups and
caters to core sectors of the Indian economy—Power generation and transmission,
industry, transportation, telecommunication, renewable energy, etc. BHEL has
acquired certifications of both ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 standards for its operations
and has also adopted the concepts of Total Quality Management. BHEL has
adopted Occupational Health and Safety Standards as per OHSAS 18001. Two of
its divisions have acquired certification to OHSAS 18001 standard and other units,
too, are in the process of acquiring the same.
BHEL has
• Installed equipment for over 62,000 MW of power generation—for Utilities,
Captive and Industrial users.
• Supplied 2,00,000 MVA transformer capacity and sustained equipment operat-
ing in transmission and distribution network up to 400 kV—AC and DC.
• Successfully tested transformers of rating as high as 200 MVA, 1-ph generator
transformer and 167 MVA, 1-ph auto transformer at an independent lab in
Europe.
• Supplied over 25,000 motors with drive control system to power projects, petro-
chemicals, refineries, steel, aluminium, fertilizer, cement plants, etc.
• Supplied traction electrics and AC/DC locos to power over 12,000 km railway
network.
• Supplied over one million valves to power plants and other industries.
TRANSFORMERS
Second Edition
McGraw-Hill Offices
New Delhi New York St Louis San Francisco Auckland Bogotá Caracas
Kuala Lumpur Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan Montreal
San Juan Santiago Singapore Sydney Tokyo Toronto
Information contained in this work has been obtained
by Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited,
from sources believed to be reliable. However,
neither Tata McGraw-Hill nor its authors guarantee
the accuracy or completeness of any information
published herein, and neither Tata McGraw-Hill nor
its authors shall be responsible for any errors,
omissions, or damages arising out of use of this
information. This work is published with the
understanding that Tata McGraw-Hill and its authors
are supplying information but are not attempting to
render engineering or other professional services. If
such services are required, the assistance of an
appropriate professional should be sought.
Tata McGraw-Hill
ISBN 0-07-048315-9
RZZCRRDDDZRRL
Message I
Message II
Foreword
K.G. Ramachandran
CMD–BHEL
New Delhi
C HAPTER 29
Transformers was first published in the year 1987. With the publica-
tion of this second edition, the book celebrates its 15th anniversary.
The success of the book is evident from the increase in its demand
among practising engineers and academicians. Starting from the
fundamentals of design, manufacturing technology, materials used,
etc. the book caters to the latest developments, too. The chapters
provide an in depth knowledge and understanding of the intricacies
of transformers, including the various aspects of latest technological
upgradation. Six new chapters have been introduced in this edition
of the book:
§ Designing and manufacturing—A short-circuit proof trans-
former
§ High voltage condenser bushings
§ Computerization—A tool to enhance engineering prod-
uctivity
§ Condition monitoring, residual life assessment and
refurbishment of transformer
§ Controlled shunt reactor
§ An overview of transformer
Solved examples have also been included in the book to illustrate
better the design aspects of a power transformer.
With these enhancements, the book will serve as a useful
reference book for practising engineers engaged in design, manu-
facturing, planning, testing, erection, operation and maintenance of
transformers as well as for students and researchers.
This book is a collective effort of experts in the field of
transformers at Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL), a leading
transformer manufacturer in India. My thanks are due to all the
authors who contributed the various chapters to this book. The
xiv Preface to the Second Edition
S. N. Roy
Executive Director
BHEL, Bhopal
C HAPTER 29
R.K. Saraf
Executive Director
BHEL, Bhopal
C HAPTER 29
Acknowledgements
The editorial committee was given the task of bringing in the revised
edition of the book on Transformers. It is indeed commendable that
the committee could accomplish the task in a very short time. We
acknowledge with thanks the permission given by the management
of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. for publishing this new edition.
Thanks are also due to all the authors who contributed chapters
to this book.
Integrating the entire material and presenting it as a homogenous
whole and at the same time, selecting new chapters and updating the
existing chapters to cover many other aspects in detail was an uphill
task. Our grateful thanks are also due to the editorial committee
members who put in exemplary efforts without which this book
could not have taken this shape.
P.T. Deo
Executive Director
BHEL, Delhi
Editorial Committee
Shri T.K. Ganguli
Shri M.V. Prabhakar
Shri S.K. Gupta
Shri R.K. Singh
Shri K. Gopal Krishnan
C HAPTER 29
Contents
Message I vii
Message II ix
Foreword xi
Preface to the Second Edition xiii
Preface to the First Edition xv
Acknowledgements xvii
Editorial Committee xviii
1. Introduction 1
• T.K. Ganguli
2. Principles of Transformers 6
• R.K. Singh
2.1 Working Principle of a Transformer 6
2.2 Elementary Theory of an Ideal Transformer 7
2.3 EMF Equation of a Transformer 8
2.4 Voltage Transformation Ratio (K) 9
2.5 Ideal Transformer 10
2.6 Transformer Having Winding Resistance
But No Magnetic Leakage 13
2.7 Magnetic Leakage 14
2.8 Transformer with Resistance and
Leakage Reactance 15
2.9 Equivalent Circuit 16
2.10 Regulation 21
2.11 Losses in Transformers 21
2.12 Efficiency 22
2.13 The Auto-Transformer 23
2.14 Three-winding Transformer 25
2.15 Parallel Operations of Transformers 27
Appendix 32
References 33
xx Contents
Introduction
T.K. Ganguli
The history of transformer goes back to the early 1880s. With the
sharp increase in demand for electric power, power transformers in
400 kV ratings were produced as early as 1950. In the early 1970s
unit ratings as large as 1100 MVA were produced and 800 kV and
even higher kV class transformers were manufactured in the early
1980s.
A transformer is a static piece of equipment with a complicated
electromagnetic circuit inside. The energy is transferred from one
electrical circuit to another through the magnetic field. In its sim-
plest form, a transformer consists of two conducting coils having a
mutual inductance. In an ideal case it is assumed that all the flux
linked with the primary winding also links the secondary winding.
But, in practice it is impossible to realize this condition as magnetic
flux cannot be confined. The greater portion of the flux flows in the
core while a small portion called the leakage flux links one or the
other winding. Depending upon the particular application and type
of connection, a transformer may have additional windings apart
from the two conventional windings. Chapter 2 deals with the prin-
ciples of transformers mainly covering the basic electromagnetic
force (emf) equation, ideal transformer, equivalent circuit, calcula-
tion of regulation, no load and load losses, efficiency and parallel
operation of transformers.
Major materials like copper, cold-rolled grain oriented silicon
steel, insulating oil, pressboard and paper insulation and certain
ferrous and nonferrous items are essential to build a compact and
trouble-free transformer. Chapter 3 has been primarily devoted to
explain the characteristics of these materials which shall be helpful
in selecting the correct material for the equipment.
2 Transformers, 2/e
Principles
of Transformers
R.K. Singh
Laminated core
Secondary
Primary
f V1
90° Im
V1 E1 E2 O
V2 90° f
E1
V2 = E2
(a) (b)
(b) If N2 < N1, i.e., K < 1, then the transformer is called as step-
down transformer.
Again for an ideal transformer
Input = Output
V1I1 = V2I2 (neglecting Im)
I2 V 1
or = 1 = (2.5)
I1 V2 K
where I1 and I2 are primary and secondary currents.
Hence the currents are in the inverse ratio of the transformation
ratio.
V1
Iw I0
f
Im
E1
E2
f
I0
V1 V2
f
I0 Load
V1 I2
f2
f
I 2¢ f2
Load
I0
V1 I2
f2
f
I1 Load
V1 I2
Fig. 2.5 are shown the vector diagrams for a loaded transformer. In
Fig. 2.5(a), current I¢2 is in phase with E2 (for non-inductive loads).
In Fig. 2.5(b), it is lagging behind E2 (for inductive loads).
V1 V1
V1
I1
I1 I2¢ I2¢ = I1
q1
I2¢
q1
q1 I0
q0 I0
q q q
I2
q2 q2
I2
I2
E2 E2 E2
K=1 K=1 K=1
(I0 Neglected)
(a) (b) (c)
I1R1 V1 I1R1
V1
I1R1 V1
E1 E1 I ¢2 = KI2 E1
I1 I1
I1
I ¢2
I ¢2 = KI2
q1
I0 I0 I0
f
q f
q2 f2
I2 I2
V2 I2
V2 V2
I2R2 I2R2 E2
E2 E2 I2R2
K=1
K=1 K=1 I0 neglected
In an ideal case it is assumed that all the flux linked with the
primary winding also links the secondary winding. But, in practice
it is impossible to realize this condition as magnetic flux cannot be
confined. The greater portion of the flux (i.e., the mutual flux) flows
Principles of Transformers 15
in the core while a small proportion (Fig. 2.7) called the leakage flux
links one or the other winding, but not both. On account of the
leakage flux, both the primary and secondary windings have leakage
reactance, that is, each will become the seat of an emf of self-induc-
tion, of a magnitude equal to a small fraction of the emf due to main
flux. The terminal voltage V1 applied to the primary must, therefore,
have a component I1 X1 (where X1 is leakage reactance of primary) to
balance the primary leakage emf. In the secondary, similarly, an emf
of self-induction I2 X2 (where X2 is leakage reactance of secondary) is
developed. The primary and secondary coils in Fig. 2.7 are shown on
R1 X1 R2 X2
Z1 Z2
Z1 = ( R12 + X 12 )
And the secondary impedance is given by
Z2 = ( R22 + X 22 )
V1 = E1 + I1 (R1 + jX1) = E1 + I1 Z1 (2.11)
and E2 = V2 + I2 (R2 + jX2) = V2 + I2Z2 (2.12)
The vector diagram of such a transformer for different kinds of
loads is shown in Fig. 2.9. In these diagrams vectors for resistive
drops are drawn parallel to current vectors, whereas reactive drops
are perpendicular to the current vectors. The angle q1 between V1
and I1 gives the power-factor angle of the transformer.
I1
I1
I1
I ¢2 I ¢2
q1 I ¢2 q
I0 I0 I0
f
f f
f2
f2 I2
I2
V2 V2
I 2Z 2 I 2Z 2
I2R2
I2R2 E2 E2 V2 I 2Z 2
I2X2 I2X2 E2
I2R2
I2
I2X2
I1 I2
E2
V1 E1 V2
(a)
Z1 Z2
X1 I0 R2 X2
R1
Im
Iw E1 E2 V1
V1
R0 ZL
X0
Ideal transformer
(b)
Z2
I2 R 2¢ = R2/K 2 X 2¢ = X2/K 2
R2 X2 I 2¢
2
ZL Z L¢ = ZL/K
E2 V2 Load E ¢2 = E1 V 2¢ = V2/K Load
(a) (b)
Z1 Z 2¢
I1
R1 X1
I0 I 2¢ R 2¢ X 2¢
Iw Im
V1 E ¢2 = E1 V 2¢ Z L¢
R0 X0
I1 I0 I 2¢
I1 I 2¢ I 2¢
R1 X1 R 2¢ X 2¢
I0
Iw Im
V1 E ¢2 = E1 Z L¢
R0 X0
I1 I0 I 2¢
I1 R1 R 2¢ X1 X 2¢
I 2¢
I0 R01 X01
Iw Im
Z L¢
V1 V 2¢
R0 X0
I0 I2
I1
Z01
I1 = I ¢2
R01 X01
Z L¢
V1 V 2¢
(a)
2
R2 X2
R1 X1
3
R3 X3
(b)
From Fig. 2.12 it is found that total impedance between the input
terminals is
LM OP
1
Z = Mz 1 + P (2.13)
MM 1 1 P
+
N z ¢ + z ¢ z PQ
2 1 m
where Z2¢ = R2¢ + jX2¢
Zm = impedance of the exciting circuit
= R0 + jX0
LM OP
1
V 1 = I1 MMZ 1 +
1 1 P
P (2.14)
+
MN Z ¢ + Z ¢ Z PQ
2 L m
Principles of Transformers 21
2.10 Regulation
% Regulation =
LM V - V ¢ OP ¥ 100
2 2
N V Q2
Then, % regulation of a loaded transformer at any power factor is
given as
( X cos q - R sin q ) 2
= (R cos q + X sin q) + (2.15)
200
where R = percentage resistive drop
X = percentage reactive drop
cos q = lagging power-factor
It is to be noted that in case of leading power-factor, q will change
to –q.
Typical calculations for computation of percentage regulation at
different load and power factor are given in Appendix 2.1.
2.12 Efficiency
Output
% Efficiency = ¥ 100
Input
(Input - Losses)
= ¥ 100
Input
= 1-
FG Losses
¥ 100
IJ
H Input K
2.12.1 Condition of Maximum Efficiency
Copper-Loss Wc = I12 R01 = I22 R02
where R01 and R02 are equivalent resistance referred to primary and
secondary sides respectively.
Iron-Loss Wi = Wh + We
Primary input = V1I1 cos q1
LM (I R - W ) OP
Efficiency h = 1 -
2
1 01 i
MN V I cos q PQ i 1 1
L I R - W OP
= M1 - 1 01 i
(2.18)
N V cos q V I cos q Q
1 1 1 1 1
=
FG Iron-loss IJ ¥ Full-load
H Full-load copper-loss K
Typical calculations for computation of percentage efficiency at
different loads and power factors are given in Appendix 2.1.
I1
A
C I2
V1
I2 – I1
V2 Load
I1 B I2
N2
2¥
N1
=1–
FG 1 + N ¥ I IJ 2 2
H N IK 1 1
=1–G
F 2 K IJ = (1 – K)
H2K
FG where N2
=
I1
= KJ
I
H N 1 I2 K
or weight of copper in auto-transformer (Wa )
Principles of Transformers 25
2.14.1 Purpose
A transformer may have additional windings apart from the two
conventional main windings depending upon the particular applica-
tion and type of connection (of the main windings). In three-winding
transformers, the third winding is normally called as tertiary wind-
ing and it is provided to meet one more of the following require-
ments:
(a) For an additional load which for some reason must be kept
isolated from that of secondary.
(b) To supply phase-compensating devices, such as condensers,
operated at some voltage not equal to primary or secondary
or with some different connection (e.g. mesh).
(c) In star/star-connected transformers, to allow sufficient earth
fault current (zero-sequence component current) to flow for
operation of protective gear, to suppress harmonic voltages
and to limit voltage unbalance when the main load is asym-
metrical, the tertiary winding is delta-connected.
(d) As a voltage coil in a testing transformer.
(e) To load charge split winding generators.
(f ) To inter-connect three supply systems operating at different
voltages.
Tertiary windings are mostly delta-connected.
Consequently, when faults occur on the primary or secondary
sides (particularly between lines and earth), considerable unbal-
ance of phase voltage, may be produced which is compensated by
large circulating currents.
In case of single line-to-ground fault, either on primary or second-
ary sides, the zero sequence current flowing through the delta-con-
nected tertiary winding is given as
26 Transformers, 2/e
Ir ¥ 100
I(Z0 Tert.) = (2.19)
2 Z H - L + Z0 L - T (or Z0 H - T)
(Z0 L – T to be taken if the fault is on LV i.e. sec-
ondary side and Z0 H – T, to be taken if fault is on
HV i.e., primary side).
where Ir = Rated current in tertiary winding at rated capac-
ity of main (primary/secondary) winding.
ZH – L = Positive sequence impedance (in percentage) be-
tween primary and secondary windings at rated
capacity of main windings.
Z0L – T = Zero sequence impedance (in percentage) be-
tween secondary and tertiary windings at rated
capacity of main windings.
Z0H – T = Zero sequence impedance (in percentage) be-
tween primary and tertiary windings at rated
capacity of main windings.
Thus the reactance of the winding must be such as to limit the
circulating current to that value, which can be carried by the cop-
per, otherwise the tertiary windings may overheat and mechani-
cally collapse under fault conditions.
Transformer 1
Z1
Z2
Transformer 2
Primary (a) Secondary
Z1 Z1
Z2 Z2
(b) (c)
So I1 =
v
=
IZ12
=I
LM
Z1 Z2 OP
Z1 Z1 Z1 ( Z1 + Z2 )
N Q
IZ2
=
( Z1 + Z2 )
Similarly,
I2 =
LM IZ OP 1
N (Z + Z ) Q
1 2
IZ2 ¥ V1
VI1 =
( Z1 + Z2 )
and VI2 = VI
LM Z OP 2
–3
N (Z + Z ) Q
1 2
Writing VI ¥ 10 = S, the combined load kVA, the kVA carried by
each transformer is
S1 = S
LM Z OP 2
N (Z + Z ) Q
1 2
and S2
L Z OP
= SM 1
(2.20)
N (Z + Z ) Q
1 2
These expressions are complex, so that S1 and S2 are obtained in
magnitude and phase angle.
Case II: Unequal Voltage Ratio
Let = E1, E2 = no-load secondary emf’s
and Z = load impedance at secondary terminals
Other notations are taken as in case I above.
Then v = IZ12 = (I1 + I2) Z12
Also the emf’s of the transformers will be equal to the total drops in
their respective circuits.
E1 = I1Z1 + (I1 + I2)Z
and E2 = I2Z2 +(I1 + I2)Z (2.21)
Whence
E1 – E2 = (I1Z1 – I2Z2)
as might be expected from this expression
I1 =
bE 1 - E2 + I2 Z2 g
Z1
giving I1 in terms of I2. Substituting this Eq. (2.21) above for E2 gives
E2 = I2Z2 +
LM b E 1 g
- E2 + I2 Z2 OP
+ I2 ¥ Z
MN Z1 PQ
Whence
I2 =
E2 Z1 - ( E1 - E2 ) Z U|
Z1 Z2 + Z( Z1 + Z2 ) ||
and by symmetry V| (2.22)
E1 Z2 - ( E1 - E2 ) Z
I1 =
Z1 Z2 + Z( Z1 + Z2 )
||
W
30 Transformers, 2/e
(b) Impedance
The currents carried by the two transformers are proportional to
their ratings if their numerical or ohmic impedances are inversely
proportional to those ratings and their per-unit impedances are
identical.
A difference in the quality factor (i.e. ratio of reactance to resis-
tance) of the per-unit impedance results in a divergence of the phase
angle of the two currents, so that one transformer will be working
with a higher, and the other with a lower power factor than that of
the combined output.
(c) Polarity
The primary and secondary windings of any individual transformer
may, under certain conditions of coil winding, internal connections
and connections to terminals, have the same or opposite polarity.
When, respective induced terminal voltages for primary and
secondary windings are in the same direction, the polarity of the
two windings is the same. This polarity is generally spoken as
subtractive. When, on the other hand, the induced terminal voltages
are in opposite direction, the windings are of opposite polarity
which is usually referred to as additive.
Figure 2.18 shows the test connections at (a) and (b) respectively
for single-phase transformers having subtractive and additive
polarity. When single-phase voltage is applied to terminals A1 and
a2, the measured voltage between terminals A1 and A2 shall be less
than applied voltage in case of (a) and greater than applied voltage
in case of (b).
For three-phase transformer the testing procedure is similar,
except that the windings must be excited from three-phase supply
and more voltage measurements have to be taken for determination
of exact polarity and phase sequence. Figure 2.18(c) shows the test
connections and results for a star/star-connected transformer with
subtractive polarity.
Principles of Transformers 31
a2 a1
a2
A2 a1
Supply A2 A1
A1
(a) Subtractive polarity
a2 a1
A2 a1
a2
Supply A2 A1
A1
(b) Additive polarity
a2 A2
c2
b2
C2 C2
a2 b2 B2
Supply
A2 B2 C2
APPENDIX
Calculation of % Regulation and Efficiency
F
= 1-
500 + 120
¥ 100
I
GH 250 ¥ 103
JK
= 99.75%
(d) Efficiency at 3/4 load, 0.8 lagging power-factor
No-load loss = 120 kW
2
Load loss = 500 ¥ F 3I = 281.25 kW
H 4K
3
Input power = 250 ¥ 103 ¥ ¥ 0.8 = 150 ¥ 103 kW
4
Percentage efficiency
F
= 1-
281.25 + 120 I ¥ 100
GH 150 ¥ 103
JK
= 99.73%
REFERENCES
1. Say, M.G., The Performance and Design of AC Machines (Book), The
English Language Book Society and Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons,
London.
2. Puchstein, A.F., T.C., Lloyd and A.G., Conrad, Alternating Current
Machines, Asia Publishing House.
3. Hellman, Charles I, Elements of Radio (Book), D. Van Nostrand
Company, INC, New York.
4. Theraja, B.L., A Text Book of Electrical Technology, Sultan Chand &
Co., New Delhi.
C HAPTER 3
Materials Used
in Transformers
M.P. Singh
T.K. Ganguli
Apart from active materials like copper and cold rolled grain oriented
silicon steel, a number of ferrous, nonferrous and insulating materi-
als are employed for building up a transformer. Optimum utilization
of all materials in consonance with their electrical, mechanical,
physical, chemical and thermal characteristics is necessary for
obtaining a compact size transformer. Strict quality control measures
like testing of raw materials, therefore, become imperative. One
basic requirement for all materials used in an oil-filled transformer
is that they should be compatible with insulating oil and should not
react with or deteriorate oil.
Table 3.1 gives application, applicable national and international
standards of various materials used in a transformer.
(iii) Crepe kraft paper BS 5626–3–3 Covering over flexible copper cable
Base paper as per (i) Insulation of winding lead
above Insulation over shield
(iv) Press paper IS : 8570, BS : 3255 Backing paper for axial cooling duct
(v) Kraft paper with aluminium Base paper as per (i) Line and common shield in winding
bands above
(vi) Crepe kraft paper with aluminium Base paper as per (i) Metallization of high voltage lead
foil above and shield
35
Contd.
Table 3.1 (Contd.)
36
3. Pressboard
(i) Pressboard moulding from wet IEC 60641–3–1 Angle ring, cap, sector, snout, square
sheet or wet wood pulp tube, lead out and moulded piece of
intricate profile for insulating ends of
windings, insulation between windings
and numerous other applications
(ii) Soft calendered pressboard—solid Type C of Cylinder, barrier, wrap, spacer, angle
IS : 1576 washer, crimped washer, and yoke
IEC : 60641–3–1 insulation etc.
(iii) Soft pressboard—laminated BS EN 60763–1.2 Block, block washer, terminal-gear
Transformers, 2/e
Contd.
Table 3.1 (Contd.)
Contd.
37
Table 3.1 (Contd.)
38
8. Phenolic laminated cotton fabric sheet IS : 2036, BS : 2572 Terminal board, for making core duct,
support and cleat
B. Sealing Materials
9. Synthetic rubber bonded cork IS: 4253 (Part II) As gasket in different places to prevent
oil leakage from joints viz. tank rim,
turret opening, inspection cover and
with mounting flange of various
fittings, etc.
Contd.
Table 3.1 (Contd.)
Contd.
Table 3.1 (Contd.)
40
Contd.
Table 3.1 (Contd.)
A. Physical Properties
(i) Density. This test has special significance when transformer
is operated in a very low temperature zone. The maximum
value to density fixed at 29.5°C ensures that water in the
form of ice present in oil remains at the bottom and does not
tend to float on the oil up to a temperature of about –10°C.
(ii) Interfacial tension (IFT). This is a measure of the molecular
attractive force between oil and water molecules at their in-
terface. This test provides a means of detecting soluble polar
Materials Used in Transformers 43
Sludge
formation zone
100
and found containing sludge
Percentage of oil examined
75
50
25
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Interfacial tension, ¥ 10–3 NM
B. Electrical Properties
(i) Electric strength (breakdown voltage). BDV is the voltage at
which breakdown occurs between two electrodes when oil is
subjected to an electric field under prescribed conditions.
Electric strength is the basic parameter for insulation system
design of a transformer. It serves to indicate the presence
of contaminating agents like moisture, fibrous materials,
carbon particles, precipitable sludge and sediment.
(ii) Resistivity (specific resistance). This is the most sensitive
property of oil requiring utmost care for its proper determi-
nation. Resistivity in W cm is numerically equivalent to
the resistance between opposite faces of a centimetre
cube of the liquid. Insulation resistance of windings of a
transformer is also dependent upon the resistivity of oil. A
low value indicates the presence of moisture and conductive
contaminants.
(iii) Dielectric dissipation factor (DDF). DDF is numerically
equal to sine of the loss angle (approximately equal to tangent
of loss angle for dielectrics) and is a good tool to indicate the
quality of an insulation. A high value of DDF is an indication
of the presence of contaminants or deterioration products
such as water, oxidation products, metal soaps, soluble
varnishes and resins.
C. Chemical Properties
(i) Neutralization value (total acidity). It is a measure of free
organic and inorganic acids present in the oil and is expressed
in terms of milligrams of KOH required to neutralize the
total free acids in one gram of oil. Oxidation of oil in service
is a consequence of reaction between hydrocarbons present
46 Transformers, 2/e
Paper is a fabric made from vegetable fibres which are felted to form
a web or sheet. The fibrous raw materials are obtained from plants
including cotton, hemp, manila, straw and coniferous/deciduous
trees. The cell or fibres of such plants consist mainly of cellulose.
The molecular formula for cellulose is (C6H10O5)n. The degree of
polymerization of the molecular unit indicated by the letter n, varies
widely in various plants. The value of n can go up to 2500 or more for
cotton fibres and up to 1200 or more for wood pulp. Various other
materials, e.g. lignin, hemicellulose, mineral matter and resins are
associated with the cellulose in the fibres. These contaminants
are removed by sulphate process treatment of wood pulp and
careful water washing. The different types of paper used and their
application are given in Table 3.1. Terminal-gear and high voltage
leads are normally insulated using crepe kraft paper to obtain
higher flexibility and smaller radii at bends. These papers have
high stretchability varying between 50 to 100%.
Sl. Requirement
No. Characteristic Kraft paper Kraft paper Press
of medium air of high air paper
permeability permeability
1 2 3 4 5
I. Physical Properties
1. Substance, g/m2 100 ± 5 for 100 ± 5 for —
100 mm thk. 125 mm thk.
2. Density g/cm3 0.95 to 1.05 0.75 to 0.85 1.0 to 1.3
3. Moisture content, 8.0 8.0 8.0
% (max.)
4. Oil absorption, % — — 3 to 21%
(min) depending
upon density
5. Water absorption, 5 10 —
% (min.)
6. Air permeability 0.2–0.5 0.5–1.0 —
mm/Pa S
II. Mechanical Properties
7. Tensile strength
(expressed as tensile
index), N m/g (min.)
Machine direction 83 78 69
Cross direction 30 28 24
8. Elongation at break,
%, (min.)
Machine direction 2 2 —
Cross direction 4 4 —
9. Internal tear- Substance Tear resistance
ing resistance (g/m2) MD XD MD XD
(expressed as ≥40–80 5 6 5 6 —
tear index), > 80–120 6 7 6 7 —
mN m2/g, >120 8 9 — — —
(min.)
10. Heat stability 20 20 60
(decrease in bursting
strength), % (max.)
Contd.
Materials Used in Transformers 49
Sl. Requirement
No. Characteristic Kraft paper Kraft paper Press
of medium air of high air paper
permeability permeability
1 2 3 4 5
III. Electrical Properties
11. Electric strength
(BDV), kV/mm, (min.)
(i) In air at 90°C 7.5 7.0 10
(ii) In oil at 90°C — — 65
12. Dissipation factor of 0.003 0.003 —
unimpregnated paper
at 105°C (max.)
13. Conducting paths should be free from any conducting path
IV. Chemical Properties
14. Mineral ash, %, (max.) 1.0 1.0 2.0
15. Conductivity of 5% 10 10 13.5
aqueous extract
mS/m, (max.)
16. pH value 6–8 6–8 5.0–8.5
17. Chloride content of 50 50 —
aqueous extract,
mg/kg, (max.)
18. Conductivity of 10 10 —
organic extract,
nS/m, (max.)
V. Methods of Test IEC 60554–3 IEC 60554–3 IS : 8570
IS : 9335 (Part II) IS : 9335 (Part II)
A. Physical Properties
(i) Substance (grammage). It is the ratio of mass to the area and
is a fundamental parameter which influences most of the
mechanical and electric properties. This is a basic property
for paper making process.
(ii) Density. It is a function of thickness and grammage of
paper. Density is also a basic property for setting process
50 Transformers, 2/e
B. Mechanical Properties
(i) Tensile strength and elongation. Paper should be able to
withstand tension exerted during its wrapping over layer
winding coils. Paper tape is wound over conductors and
cables under specified tension at a high speed by paper
lapping machines. If specified tensile strength is met,
breakages of paper will not occur in paper lapping operation.
It has been proved theoretically that the displacement of
windings during short circuit of a transformer depend very
much on the Young’s modulus of insulating materials used in
windings which shows the importance of tensile strength
and elongation tests.
(ii) Internal tearing resistance. This gives the load under which
paper will tear off under specified conditions and shows its
capability against tearing.
(iii) Bursting strength. This is the pressure required to burst a
disc of paper which is gripped firmly around its periphery,
and to one side of which pressure is applied at a uniform
rate, using liquid as a medium. This test also gives an idea
about the mechanical strength of paper.
Materials Used in Transformers 51
C. Electrical Properties
(i) Electric strength. This is a basic parameter in deciding the
insulation system design of a transformer. Electric strength
depends on density and air permeability of paper.
(ii) Dissipation factor. It is a good tool to indicate the quality
of a dielectric. A high value of dissipation factor shows
presence of contaminants or depolymerization of paper.
(iii) Freedom from conducting paths. Electric strength of paper is
adversely affected by the presence of conducting paths and
hence these are undesirable impurities.
D. Chemical Properties
The conductivity of aqueous extract is a measure of the electrolytes
present in the paper which is extracted by gently boiling paper in
distilled water. The electrolytic impurities are present as ionizable
acids, bases, salts or a mixture of these. This property indicates
chemical purity of paper and is a basic parameter for paper making
process. Insulation resistance of paper is dependent on this
property. Conductivity of organic extract, pH value of aqueous ex-
tract, ash content and chloride content of aqueous extract are also
measured to check purity. Mineral ash, solid residue remaining af-
ter complete combustion of paper are injurious to paper and should be
within the permissible limits.
3.3 Pressboard
3.3.2 Moulding
Requirement
Sl. Precompressed Soft Precompressed Soft
No. Characteristic solid calendered laminated calendered
solid laminated
1 2 3 4 5 6
Composition 100% wood pulp Cotton, jute 100% wood pulp Cotton, jute
and wood pulp and wood pulp
I. Physical Properties
1. Density, g/cc 1.1–1.3 0.9–1.1 1.2–1.3 0.95–1.15
2. Moisture content, % (max.) 6 8 5 7.5
3. Oil absorption, % (min.) 9 20 5 12
4. Shrinkage, % (max.)
(i) In Air
Machine direction 0.5 1.0 0.4 1.0
Materials Used in Transformers
appearance.
Contd.
Table 3.6 (Contd.)
54
Requirement
Sl. Precompressed Soft Precompressed Soft
No. Characteristic solid calendered laminated calendered
solid laminated
1 2 3 4 5 6
Composition 100% wood pulp Cotton, jute 100% wood pulp Cotton, jute
and wood pulp and wood pulp
II. Mechanical Properties
6. Tensile strength, MPa (min.)
(i) Machine direction 100 47 — —
(ii) Cross direction 75 22 — —
7. Cross breaking strength, MPa (min.)
Transformers, 2/e
Requirement
Sl. Precompressed Soft Precompressed Soft
No. Characteristic solid calendered laminated calendered
solid laminated
1 2 3 4 5 6
Composition 100% wood pulp Cotton, jute 100% wood pulp Cotton, jute
and wood pulp and wood pulp
IV. Chemical Properties
10. Conductivity of 5% aqueous 10 11 10 15
extract, mS/m, (max.)
11. pH value of aqueous extract 5.5–9 7–9.5 5–8 5–9
12. Mineral ash, % (max.) 1 2 2 2
13. Effect on insulating oil
(i) Increase in acidity, mg N.A. N.A. 0.1 0.1
Materials Used in Transformers
KOHg, (max.)
(ii) Increase in sludge content, N.A. N.A. 0.05 0.05
% (max.)
V. Method of Test IEC 60641–3–1 IS : 1576 IEC : 60763-3.1 BS : 5354
N.A. = Not Applicable.
55
56 Transformers, 2/e
Open scarf
Open scarf
is more than the value taken in the design, the coil height
will become less than the design value after vacuum drying
and oil impregnation of transformer and this reduction can
lead to serious problems of short circuit forces if not rectified.
(ii) Shrinkage. It is a measure of reduction in length, width
and thickness of specimen after it is dried under specified
conditions. Effect of shrinkage is also taken into consideration
in the design.
(iii) Cross-breaking strength. This is determined to check the
proper adhesion of laminae in a laminated pressboard and
ensures against delamination.
(iv) Electric strength edgewise. It measures the creep strength
across the glue line of laminated pressboard.
3.4 Wood
step filler, etc. Haldu and teak wood seasoned planks are also used
as a filler material between core limbs and enveloping coils and as
yoke-step fillers.
The following types of conductors are used for making spiral, heli-
cal, continuous disc, layer and interleaved disc windings of trans-
formers described in Chapter 5.
(a) Paper covered rectangular copper conductor.
(b) Twin paper covered rectangular copper conductor bunched
together.
(c) Paper covered continuously transposed copper conductor
(CTC).
(d) Twin transposed copper conductor bunched together.
(e) Twin rectangular copper conductors bunched together and
provided with a common paper covering and a glued (epoxy
coated) paper strip between the two conductors.
(f) Epoxy coated continuously transposed conductor.
Conductors at (b) and (d) above are used to improve the winding
space factor. Individual conductor is covered with only three or four
layers of paper to electrically separate them instead of giving full
insulation as shown in Fig. 3.4. The two conductors/cables are kept
either in axial height or in radial depth of coils, thereby reducing
total coil axial height and radial depth respectively.
Conductors at (e) and (f) further improve the mechanical
strength of the winding, besides improving the space factor of the
60 Transformers, 2/e
Figure 3.4 (a) Twin rectangular bunched copper conductor. (b) Twin transposed copper conductor.
62 Transformers, 2/e
Zte
H t
Transformers, 2/e
(a) (b)
7 2 6 1 5 7
6 3 5 2 4 1
Materials Used in Transformers
5 4 4 3 3 2
Tapping leads and high voltage leads are required to be given sharp
bends up to a radius of four to five times the overall diameter of
cable. The cables used have high flexibility due to use of a fairly
large number of thin wires. Clubbed with the benefits of crepe paper
mentioned in Sec. 3.2, these cables provide extra-high flexibility
and damage to paper insulation at sharp bends is eliminated.
For all sealing purposes, to avoid oil leakage at joints, gasket and
moulded components made from nitrile rubber or nitrile rubber
bonded cork are used. Characteristics of these materials are given
in Table 3.9. PTFE and polyamide washer, tape, etc. are used for
plugs and valves.
This is the most widely used general purpose gasket. The cork
gasket is adaptable even to rough unmachined surface by virtue of
its compressibility under light seating loads. This gasket is made by
the compounding of the granular cork with medium nitrile butadiene
rubber. The cork used is clean, soft-grade type, uniformly granulated
and free from hard board, wood flour, dust and other foreign
materials. Nitrile rubber contributes to the ‘sealability’ factor that
enables the bonded cork to effect a tight seal under very light seating
loads and also permits considerable distortion of gasket without
crack and damage. The presence of cork allows compression without
excessive spreading associated with solid rubbers.
Materials Used in Transformers 67
Sl. Requirement
No. Characteristic Nitrile rubber Nitrile
bonded cork rubber
I. Mechanical Properties
1. Hardness, IRHD 70 ± 10 60 ± 5
2. Tensile strength, 1.75 8.4
MPa (min.)
3. Elongation at break — 400
% (min.)
4. Compressibility at 25–35 —
2.8 MPa, % (max.)
5. Recovery % (min.) 80 —
6. Compression set, % (max.) 85 30
7. Flexibility No breakage —
through the
granules of cork
or separation of
granules should
occur.
II. Effect of Ageing in Air
8. Increase in hardness, N.A. 10
IRHD (max.)
III. Compatibility with Insulating Oil
9. Increase in acidity, 0.1 —
mg KOH/g (max.)
10. Increase in sludge 0.05 —
content, % (max.)
IV. Methods of Test IS : 4253 IS : 3400
I. Physical Checks
1. Thickness, mm (0.18, 0.23, 0.27, 0.30, 0.35)
2. Edge camber, mm (max.) 2 for 2000 mm sample length
3. Edge burr, mm (max.) 0.05 0.05
4. Waviness, (max.) 5 mm for 2000 mm long sample,
height of any wave not to exceed 1/80
of the length of a wave, or 1 mm,
which-ever is the greater.
5. Stacking factor, % (min.) 93.5 to 96.5 depending on thickness
II. Magnetic Properties
6. Specific core-loss, W/kg (max.)
at 50 Hz.
(i) At 1.5 T 0.69–1.11 —
(ii) At 1.7 T 1.17 to 1.57 0.95–1.17
7. Ageing test (increase in core- 3 3
loss after ageing at 150°C
for 14 days), % (max.)
8. Magnetic induction at mag- 1.75 1.85
netizing force of 800 A/m
(B8), T (min.)
9. Specific apparent power at 1.25 1.0
induction of 1.5 T, VA/kg
(max.)
10. Saturation induction, T 2.03 2.03
Contd.
70 Transformers, 2/e
RD RD
HI-B CGO
1.75
D Wh 15/50 0.12 W/kg
/50
1.80 17
Wh
Induction B8 (T)
1.85
1.90
1.95
D Wh 17/50 0.16 W/kg
2.00
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
Phosp
hate c
oating
Glass
film
n
)
io
00
a
ct
(1
re
)
00
di
a
g
(1
llin
a
Ro
)
00
0) a
(10
(1
M65
M6
1.4
M55
1.3 M4H
CGO M5
1958 M45
Core-loss (w/kg)
1971 M3H
M4
1.2 M2H
M3H
1.1 HI-B
1971 M2H
M2H
1972 M1H
M1H
1.0
1975 M0H
0.8
0.28 0.30 0.35
Thickness (mm)
Table 3.11 lays down the possible methods of reducing core loss:
However, when domain refined steel is used for manufacturing of
the transformer core, it is very important to keep in mind that this
material should not be subjected to annealing, unlike CGO and
HI-B grade steels, as this process would totally disturb the domain
refinement achieved, and would lose the purpose of its use, i.e. low
core-loss.
74
2.0
mm
0.30 mm
HI-B 0.30
1.8
CGO
1.6
1.4
Induction B (T )
1.2
Transformers, 2/e
HI-B 0.30 mm
CGO 0.30 mm
1.0
0.8
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Core-loss (W/kg)
B = 1.4 T
B = 1.85 T
3.8.3 Magnetostriction
HI-B Assumed
1.8
CGO
1.6
Induction B (T )
1.4
1.0
0.8
10 50 100 500 1,000 5,000 10,000
Magnetizing force H(A/M)
Figure 3.13 Comparison of D-C B-H curves between HI-B and CGO.
77
78 Transformers, 2/e
2 HI-B 0.30 mm
CGO 0.30 mm
Magnetostriction DL/L
60 Hz
1
Materials Used in Transformers
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Induction B (T )
Figure 3.14 Peak-to-peak magnetostriction against induction for HI-B and CGO.
79
80 Transformers, 2/e
B
Compr-
ession Tensile and compressive component
Tension
Ps
Pz
0
Ps
–10 –8 –6 –4 –2 0 2 4 6 8 10 MPa
Compression Tension
Deflection of magnetostriction
pertinent to peak Bj of the magnetic
polarization, l as a function of
mechanical stress o, both valus in
rolling direction
Transformers, 2/e
–10 –8 –6 –4 –2 2 4 6 8 10
Compression Contracting Tension
MPa
Contraction
Figure 3.17 Alternating field magnetostriction CRGO as a function of external mechanical stress.
Materials Used in Transformers 83
REFERENCES
1. Viswanathan, P.N. et al.,
“Paper for Cable Insulation from Indigenous Wood Pulps”, National
Seminar on Electrical Insulation held in Nov. 1974 sponsored by the
Institution of Engineers (India), Electrical Engg. Division, IEMA
and ISI.
2. Philip, P.K., “Insulation Pressboard for Transformers”, Electrical
India, Vol. XIX, No. 24, pp. 5–13, Jan. 1980.
3. BICC Connolly’s U.K. Publication No. 798
‘Continuously Transposed Conductor’.
4. Thyssen Grillo Funke, W.G., Brochure, “Grain Oriented Electrical
Sheet”, 1980 edition.
5. “Technical Data on Orient-Core, HI-B”
Nippon Steel Corporation, Japan, Cat. No. EXE 367, Dec. 1976.
6. “Technical Data on Domain Refined Orient Core HI–B. Nippon Steel
Corporation, Japan. Cat. No. EXE. 706, Nov. 1987.
C HAPTER 4
Magnetic Circuit
K. N. Labh, R.C. Agarwal
4.1 Material
(cold rolled grain oriented silicon steel) has the minimum epstein
losses to the flow of magnetic flux along the directions of grain ori-
entation and this material is universally used for the manufacture
of transformer cores.
The adoption of CRGOS has brought about considerable reduc-
tion in the specific iron-losses (W/kg) over the earlier grades of core
steel. However, CRGOS is susceptible to increased losses due to flux
flow in directions other than that of grain orientation, effect of
mechanical strain due to clamping pressure, bolt holes, jointing of
limb with yokes,1 etc. Apart from this sensitivity to the direction
of rolling, CRGOS sheets are also very susceptible to impaired
performance due to impact of bending, blanking the cutting. Both
surfaces of the core steel sheets are provided with an insulating
of oxide coating (commercially known as Carlite). The stacking
factor of lamination improves by using thicker laminations, but
eddy current loss goes up in proportion to square of the thickness
of the lamination. For reducing the eddy current losses, thinner
laminations are preferable even though the stacking factor goes
down. Deburring of the laminations improves the stacking factor
and minimizes the eddy losses. After machining, the material has
to be annealed at 800–900°C in a neutral gas environment. The
material properties of core steel are further discussed in Chapter 3.
magnetic flux density (magnetic loading) the net weight of core can
be reduced, but this leads to corresponding increase in the core
losses. One has to compute an optimum value of the magnetic flux
density, keeping in view all the above considerations.
1
2
To mitigate such difficulties the windings are split into two parts
and placed around two separate limbs. Here the cross-sectional area
of the legs (limbs) and the yokes are identical. Consequently these
90 Transformers, 2/e
1 2
4 4
6 6
5
3
Figure 4.3 Three-phase five-limbed core: (1) main limbs, (2) top
main yokes, (3) bottom main yokes, (4) auxiliary top
yokes, (5) auxiliary bottom yokes, (6) auxiliary
limbs.
For the optimum design of magnetic core, the following aspects have
to be decided.
(a) Constructional features
(b) Core cross-sectional area
(c) Number of oil ducts and location
The ideal shape for the section of the cores is a circle, since this
would waste no space beyond that taken up by the insulation
92 Transformers, 2/e
2 H
For any particular core diameter, the first and foremost point to be
decided is the maximum allowable height of the lamination packets.
This, in turn, is determined by the design consideration of clamp
plate (see Fig. 4.5) and the pertinent constraint in accommodating
them inside the core circle.
For a circle of diameter D, the length of the cord at distance Y
from the centre is given by
F F DI 2 I
F(Y) = 2 GG GH 2 JK - Y2 JJ (4.1)
H K
If H is the maximum allowable packet height, the minimum
allowable lamination width is given by
94 Transformers, 2/e
F (Y )
F F DI F H I
2 2 I
Lmin. = 2 GG GH 2 JK - GH 2 JK JJ (4.2)
H K
The maximum allowable width of the central packet is usually core
diameter less G mm (to accommodate wooden packing)
i.e. Lmax. = D – G (4.3)
If the core is to be built up in Ns number of steps, where widths of
laminations of individual steps are Li, i = 1, 2,... Ns, these values
must satisfy the following relations
Lmin. £ Li £ Lmax. (4.4)
i = 1, 2,...., Ns
For building the circular cross-section of the core in say Ns steps, we
have to decide Ns different widths of laminations to be stacked one
over the other as shown in Fig. 4.4. The packet height of each
lamination is computed by the difference of heights of cords equal
to the width of laminations and the adjacent next width below it.
The gross cross-sectional area contributed by individual lamination
Magnetic Circuit 95
Tx = W◊x◊
FG x +h
IJ (4.5)
H 2K 1 K
Ty = W◊y◊ G
F y + hJ
I (4.6)
H 2K 2 K
where
W = specific cross gain loss, W/kg,
K1 = thermal conductivity along the laminations, W/°C/
mm,
K2 = thermal conductivity across the laminations W/°C/
mm,
96 Transformers, 2/e
Y-DIR
Heat flow along laminations
2Y
X-DIR
2X
i.e. W◊y
FG y IJ
+h =
Tx ◊ Th
(4.8.2)
H 2K 2 K Tx - Th
The value of W depends on the type of core construction and
remains constant for a particular type of assembly. The value of Tx
increases parabolically with the value of x. An interesting condition
arises when x = x* such that
Tx £ Th (4.9)
The equality condition of (4.9) implies that y = •, i.e. for x = x*, Th
will never achieve its specified maximum value for value of y, and,
Magnetic Circuit 97
1
where C1 =
2K2
U|
|V
and C2
F T ◊ T IJ W |
=G x h
(4.11)
H T - T K |W
x h
Ducts
Zone 2
Zone 1
2x 1 2y 1
For Zone 1
1 1 1
= + (4.12)
Th1 Tx 1 Ty1
C0 = p
FG 1
-
1
Hx 1 ( x1 + 2 K 1 h) x2 ( x2 + 2 K 2 h)
+
K2
-
K2 IJ
y1 ( y1 + 2 K 1 h) y2 ( y2 + 2 K 2 h) K
(4.17)
where K2 = K2/K1 UV
and p = normalizing constant (4.18)
y1 + 2y2 = H/2
W
2
U|
F DI
x = G J -y
2
2 V| (4.19)
H 2K 1
W
Since x1 is a constant and y and x are related to x and y Eq. (4.19),
2 2
we have
C0 = f(y1) (4.20)
The desired value of y is the one which satisfies C0 ~
- 0. This is
obtained by an iterative procedure on computer. The distance of oil
ducts from centre of core circle are similarly computed for number of
oil ducts more than two no similar principle.
In the foregoing, the broad concepts of optimum design of trans-
former cores of circular cross-section has been discussed. Based on
the optimum core cross-sectional area and operating flux density,
the windings for individual phases can be designed and from this
the core window size can be worked out. This decides the overall
transformer core frame dimensions for a particular type of core
construction as illustrated in Figs. 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3.
4.4 Manufacturing
achieve
(a) higher reliability
(b) reduction in iron-losses and megnetizing current
(c) lowering material and labour cost
(d) abatement of noise levels
It is necessary to apply quality checks at different stages of manu-
facturing to ensure quality and reliability. The core steel samples
should be tested regularly for guaranteed epstein iron-loss values.
The laminations should also be visually inspected and the rusted lot
should be rejected. CRGOS sheet steels are susceptible to impaired
losses due to cutting, punching, piercing, bending, etc. During cutting
and piercing the edges develop burrs which may cut, as knife-edge,
the insulation coatings on the adjacent laminations, in addition to
lowering the stacking factor. It is imperative that laminations are
deburred and annealed (for stress relieving), so that iron losses do
not increase. For reducing the transformer noises, the laminations
should be tightly clamped together and punch holes should be
avoided as far as possible. The air gap at the joints can be controlled
by working on tight tolerances so that value of magnetizing
currents are kept to a minimum. These manufacturing aspects are
discussed in more detail in the following:
(d) Deburring
During the process of slitting, cutting and piercing of laminations,
the cut edges get some burrs. These burrs are removed by passing
the laminations through deburring operations. Presence of burrs
impairs the stacking factor. Also burrs cut into the insulation
coatings and bridge adjacent laminations and thereby increase the
eddy losses.
104 Transformers, 2/e
(e) Annealing/Varnishing
If the insulation coatings at the edges are scratched during deburring
process or extra varnish coating is desired, the laminations are
processed in a varnishing plant which provides a thin coating of
varnish and quickly dried up at elevated temperature. However,
varnish coating is not considered as necessary if the carlite insula-
tion coating on the lamination is consistent. During the process of
slitting, cropping, piercing, deburring, etc., mechanical strains are
developed inside the laminations, which disturb the original grain
orientation and thereby increase the iron-losses. This problem
is mitigated by annealing the laminations in an annealing plant
[Fig. 4.16 (Plate 2)].
Annealing is done at an elevated temperature of 800–900°C,
preferably in a neutral atmospheric zone and subsequently cooled
by a blast of air.
The finished laminations are then taken to the core assembly
area.
6 6
7 7
5
4
3
REFERENCES
1. Brechha, H., “Some Aspects of Modern Transformer Core Design”,
Bulletin Oerlikon, No. 324, pp. 70–80.
2. Brechna, H. “New Design Trends in Construction of Transformer
Cores”, Bulletin Oerlikon, No. 326, pp. 6–14.
3. Austen Stignant and Franklin, J and P Transformer Book,
Newness–Butterworths, 10th Edition, 1973.
4. Bhusan Prabhakar, “Optimum Design of Distribution Trans-
formers”, M. Tech. Thesis, 1971, Deptt. of Electrical Engg., IIT
Kanpur.
C HAPTER 5
Windings
and Insulation
M. V. Prabhakar
S.K. Gupta
Bakelite cylinder
This type of winding is used for voltage between 33 and 132 kV and
medium current ratings. These coils consist of a number of sections
Windings and Insulation 111
Start Finish
placed in the axial direction (Fig. 5.7), with ducts between them.
Each section is a flat coil, having more than one turn, while each
turn itself may comprise one or more conductors (usually not more
than four or five), in parallel. The sections are connected in series,
but without any joints between them. This is achieved by a special
method of winding. It is not necessary to provide a cylindrical
former for these coils, as these are self-supporting. Each disc is
mechanically strong and exhibits good withstand of axial forces.
Another particular advantage of these coils is that, each section can
have either integral or fractional number of turns (for example
15
4 turns per section).
18
5.1.5 Transposition
6 3 4 1
5 2 5 2
4 1 6 3
3 6 1 4
2 5 2 5
1 4 3 6
1 12 2 1 3 2 4 3 12 11
2 11 3 12 4 1 5 2 1 10
3 10 4 11 5 12 6 1 2 9
4 9 5 10 6 11 7 12 3 8
5 8 6 9 7 10 8 11 4 7
6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 6
(c) For disc windings having more than one conductor in parallel,
transposition is made between the conductors by changing
their mutual position at each cross-over from one section to
another (Fig. 5.10).
1 2 3
1 2 3
12 4 11 3 10 2 9 1
Interleaved
disc pair
5 13 6 14 7 15 8 16
18 17
20 4 19 3 18 2 17 1
5 21 6 22 7 23 8 24
Interleaved
disc-quad.
28 12 27 11 26 10 25 9
13 29 14 30 15 31 16 32
34 33
S1
7 6 5 4 3 2 1
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
S2
21 20 19 18 17 16 15
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
S3
Neutral Line
shield shield
Neutral Line
shield shield
M1k M1n
L1 Lk Lk + 1 Ln
o M12 1 L2 2 K n
Csk + 1
V (t )
Cg1 Cg2 Cgk Cgn – 1 Cgn
LM e OP
1 LMCs1 . p . v(t) OP
e 0
p M P =C MM PP
2 –1
or (5.4)
MM � PP MN �
PQ
nNe Q 0
where
LM(C g1 + Cs1 + Cs2 ) - Cs2 0...............0 OP
MM -Cs2 (C g 2 Cs2 Cs3 ) - Cs3 ........0
+ +
PP
�
C= M PP
MM �
MM 0 0......................................-Csn PP
N 0 0 - Csn - 1 (Cgn - 1 + Csn - 1 + Csn ) PQ
120 Transformers, 2/e
a=0
a a=5
=
10
Line Neutral
end end
Sometimes these shields are used in the neutral end also. These
shields are connected electrically to the end-section. Being in close
proximity of the section, there exists a large capacitance between
the shield and the turns of the end-section. Due to this additional
capacitance, the initial voltage distribution in the end-section
becomes more linear.
For plain disc windings, a generally varies from 5 to 15. An outer
coil has less a compared to a similar inner coil as the latter faces two
ground planes (i.e. higher Cg).
The a of the windings can be reduced either by (a) decreasing the
Cg, or (b) by increasing the Cs. The latter approach is followed in
case of interleaved disc windings. Referring to Fig. 5.12 we find that
the voltage between two adjacent conductors is 2m. (V/T), where
m is the number of turns/section. The stored energy between the
adjacent conductors is
1
Q1 = C [2m (V/T)]2
2
1
= ◊ 4m2 C (V/T)2
2
Whereas the corresponding energy between the adjacent conductors
in a plain disc winding is
1
Q2 = C(V/T)2
2
Q1 = 4m2 Q2
In other words, the effective series capacitance of the interleaved
disc winding is 4m2 times more. This will bring down the a substan-
tially and result in nearly linear distribution.
The other approach, i.e. of decreasing the Cg is followed in
shielded layer windings. The portion of the winding seen by earth is
very small because of the concentric dispositions of the layers. Also,
equalization of the inter-layer (series) capacitance, by shortening
the length of layers corresponding to increased diameter, ensures
nearly uniform distribution of impulse voltage between the layers
(Fig. 5.19).
Ideal
Initial
3U1
2U1
1U1
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
6 12 18 24 30 36 42
(a) Response near line end.
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
6 12 18 30 36 42
–0.2
–0.4
(b) Response at the middle of the winding.
0.4
0.2
0
6 12 18 42
–0.2
–0.4
(c) Response near the neutral end.
LM L 1 M 12 M 13 ......... M 1n OP
M M 21 L2 M 23 ......... M2 n PP
P =M �
(inductance M
matrix) MM � PP
NM n1 M n2 M n3 .......... Ln PQ
where Li = Self-inductance
Mjk = mutual inductance
LM 1 0 0....... 0OP
MM Cs0 1
1 0........ �PP
S =M Cs2 �P
(series capacitance MM � �P
matrix) 1 P
MM � ........
Cs Pn PQ
N0 0
LM F 1 + 1 I -
1
0 ...
OP... 0
MM H G C s1 C J
K
g1 C g1 PP
1 F 1 + 1 + 1I 1
Q = MM -
C GH C C C JK -
C
... 0 P
PP
g1 g1 s2 g2 g2
(combined MM �
series and �
ground MM � �
PP
capacitance
N.................... .............................. ...................PQ
matrix)
d2
where p2 =
dt 2
G = Q–1
H = Q–1 SP–1
F = Q–1SP–1 (S – Q)
Equation (5.6) can be solved numerically (say by 4th order Runge-
Kutta Method)6. Figure 5.21 shows the responses at various points
in a transformer winding under impulse voltage, as obtained by this
method.
Axial
duct
Figure 5.22 Axial oil flow duct. Figure 5.23 Radial oil flow duct.
Intermediate
cooling duct
Baffles
(a) Oil
(i) In a composite dielectric system, the dielectric with lower
permittivity bears more than average voltage stress. The
permittivity of transformer oil is nearly half that of
pressboard. Therefore, the electric stress is nearly twice as
great in the oil in the annular ducts as on the pressboard
cylinders for the same thickness of insulation.
(ii) The electric strength of oil is substantially less than that of
cellulosic material.
(iii) Oil ducts show an important characteristic of voltage
withstand, that narrower the duct, higher is the stress
withstand level (kV/mm).
Under the influence of electric field, foreign substances
in oil in the form of dust, moisture, etc., have a tendency to
align themselves in radial lines, giving rise to paths of low
dielectric strength, with consequent danger of breakdown.
Windings and Insulation 129
A2
e3 e2
4 3 2
q
e4 e1
A3 5 1 A1
A0
e5 e8
8 s
6 7
e6 e7
A4
r p
ÂAC i i
i=1
or A0 = 4
ÂC i
i=1
Windings and Insulation 133
LV
A HV R
Figure 5.27 Typical field plot of the coil end region in a high
voltage transformer.
10%
20%
30%
40%
A B 50%
Angle ring
Angle ring 60%
Angle ring
70%
80%
Angle ring
650 KVP
KVP
650 KVP 550 KVP
72.4%
100%
KVP
650 KVP
760
(85.5%)
Coil No. 1
Coil No. 2
Coil No. 3
Coil No. 4
Coil No. 5
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
REFERENCES
1. Heller and Veverka, Surge Phenomenon in Electrical Machines,
Ileffe Books Ltd, London.
2. Blume, L.F. et al, “Transformer Engineering”, John Wiley & Sons,
New York, 1965.
3. Lovas-Nagy et al., “A Matrix Method of Calculating the Distribution
of Transient Voltages in Transformer Winding”, Proc IEE, Vol. 110,
pp 1663, 1963.
4. Miki, Hosoya and Okuyama; “A Calculation Method for Impulse
Voltage Distribution and Transferred Voltage in Transformer
Windings”, Trans IEEE, PAS-97, No. 3, May/June 1978.
5. Dent, B.M., Hartil et al.; “Method of Analysis of Transformer
Impulse Voltage Distribution Using a Digital Computer”, Proc IEE,
Vol. 105, Part A, 1958.
6. Smith, G.D.; “Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations:
Finite Difference Methods”, Oxford Press.
7. Moser, H.P., “Transformer board”, Scientia Electrica.
Windings and Insulation 137
Voltage Regulation
and Tapchanger
B. L. Rawat
A.K. Ekka
Manual
operating
mechanism
Insulating
shaft
Fixed
contact
Moving
contact
6
5
4
3
5 2 2
4 3 1
3
2 4 5
2 4
1
3 1
1 5 X
X 6
X
(a) Linear (b) Single-bridging
4
8
12 4
11 10 11
10
9
8 9 2
7 3
7
12 3
2
6 2
5
4 4 5
3
2 3
1
3 1
X 1
X 6
(c) Double-bridging (d) Series-parallel
X
X 2
2 1
(e) Star-delta
3
2 4
(b) Transition contact makes on the
1
3
2 4
3
2 4
1
3
2 4
1
3
2 4
3
2 4
(b) The resistors contact M1 has made
1
3
2 4
(c) The resistor contact M2 has made on
1
3
2 4
3
2 4
(e) Top position No. 3. The main contact
1
8 steps
8 steps
R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2
M1 A1 A2 M2 M1 A1 A2 M2 M1 A1 A2 M2
Voltage Regulation and Tapchanger
N N N
Figure 6.5 Linear coarse-fine and reversing switch type connection diagram.
146 Transformers, 2/e
RP
RP SP
N N N
(a) With installed (c) With tie-in resistor RP (c) With double
tie-in resistor RP and potential switch SP reversing switch
(a) Three-pole mid-winding (b) Three-pole line-end (c) Two-pole and one-pole
arrangement arrangement line-end arrangement
transformer for any electrical fault that takes place in the diverter
switch compartment.
Transformer
To load
C.T.
V.T.
Potentio- Reactor
meter
REFERENCE
1. Stigant S. Austeen and A.C. Franklin, The J & P Transformer Book,
Newness–Butterworth, London.
C HAPTER 7
Electromagnetic Forces
in Power Transformers
M. V. Prabhakar
T.K. Ganguli
Forces are produced due to the interaction of the current and the
magnetic flux density vectors. Thus, in general, the force vector can
have any direction. Nevertheless, it is easier to speak of the radial
Electromagnetic Forces in Power Transformers 155
Secondary coil
Primary coil
Next limb/tank
Core
*
N1 N2
forces and the axial forces in a transformer, since these two compo-
nents of the force can be calculated and analyzed independently.
Also, the two components have influence on different parts of the
total transformer and it is necessary to obtain the two components
for design purposes. The nomenclature axial and radial is applicable
to concentric wound core type transformer and is assumed in the
following discussion.
Radial forces are those that act in the radial direction and are
generated by the interaction of the current and the axial component
of the leakage flux density. They tend to squeeze the inner winding
156 Transformers, 2/e
and burst the outer winding. The calculation of radial forces does
not present much difficulty since the axial component of the leakage
flux density is calculable fairly accurately. Calculation of the stresses
due to this force acting on the conductors is more complex, especially
for inner windings. The compressive strength of winding is influ-
enced by the radial thickness of conductors, its work hardening
strength, number of blocks per circle, and winding dimensions etc.
Similarly, the outer winding experiences outward radial force
which results in tensile stress. The tensile strength of winding
depends on the work hardening strength of the conductors.
Axial forces are those that act in the axial direction and are gener-
ated by the interaction of the current and the radial component of
the leakage flux density. These forces tend to bend the conductors in
the axial direction, and their sum total act on the coil-clamping ring
and other clamping structures. The calculation of axial forces
presents some problems since the radial component of the leakage
(b)
(c)
(a) Billing1,2 has given formulae and curves for the calculation
of radial and axial short-circuit forces in transformers. His
formulae are derived considering the windings as current
sheets. These are fairly accurate for close-wound coils (spiral
coils).
(b) Waters3,4 has given formulae and constants for the calcula-
tion of radial and axial forces. He uses the residual ampere-
turn method to obtain the unbalanced ampere-turns from
which the axial forces are calculated using certain empirical
constants. The method is suitable for transformers with only
two distinct windings or coils.
applying Eq. (7.1). An assumption is made that all the leakage flux
is axial only and passes between top and bottom yokes in straight
lines. This assumption is also made in calculation of leakage
reactance and will lead to a slightly higher value of radial force.
The flux density at the mean radial depth of the winding is given
by
1
B = m ¥ NI/L (7.2)
2 o
The average radial force is
Fr = B ¥ i ¥ l
1 NI
= m ¥ I ¥ pDm N
2 o L
1 ( NI ) 2
= mo ¥ ¥ pDm N
2 L
( NI ) 2
= 19.739 ¥ 10–7 ¥ Dm N (7.3)
L
Due to the assumption that all the flux is axial in nature,
Eq. (7.3) will result in a force larger than that due to any other
formula. It is used in all stress calculations and in the design of
windings. The maximum force per turn will occur at the inner turn
of innermost layer of the outer winding and the outer turn of the
inner winding and will be given by
2Fr
Fm = (7.4)
N
If the turn experiencing this force has small radial dimension and
is unsupported by any adjacent turns, the stress calculations are
done using Eq. (7.4). Otherwise the average force of Eq. (7.3) is used
for stress calculations.
Fr Fr
(a) (b)
(c)
cj
d
cj ¢
dj ¢
dj
x
c
Where Bh,k is given by Eqs (7.8), (7.9) or (7.10) as the case may be.
A fairly accurate solution is obtained when h and k are varied from
1 to 20.
Eve
nly
forc distribu
the e along ted
win
ding
(a) (b)
1 1
3 3
H.V. WNDG
H.V. WNDG
2
L.V. WNDG
L.V. WNDG
3 3
1 1
A + B
C + D
Bending moment
W12
M = (7.17)
10
Section modulus of ring
1 2
Z = bt (7.18)
6
Electromagnetic Forces in Power Transformers 171
Bending stresses
M
fb = (7.19)
Z
The results obtained by Eq. (7.19) are on the conservative side,
because of the assumption made for boundary condition of fixing
bolts as average of simply supported and fixed beam conditions. The
allowable bending stresses further depend on allowable factor of
safety, which is generally very low for short-circuit forces.
B B
H1
A B B A
D1
X
H
B B
A A
D1
B B
Core bolt
A A C Pin
+ + +
B D E
L1
L3
L2
L1
L
F3
F1
F4 F2
R R
b1
t1
h1
REFERENCES
1. Billig, E., Mechanical Stresses in Transformer Windings, Critical
Resume, E.R.A. Report Q/T 101, 1943.
2. Billig, E. Mechanical Stresses in Transformer Windings, Journal
I.E.E., Vol. 93, Part II, June, 1946.
3. Waters, M., The Measurement and Calculation of Axial
Electromagnetic Forces in Concentric Transformer Windings,
Journal IEE, Vol. Part II.
4. Waters, M., The Short-circuit Strength of Power Transformers,
Book, Macdonald and Co, London, 1966.
5. Roth, E., Analytical Study of the Leakage Field in Transformers and
of the Mechanical Forces Acting On the Windings, General Electric
Review, Vol. 23, p. 773, May 1928.
6. Roth, E., Magnetic Leakage Inductance in Transformers With
Cylindrical Windings and Forces Acting on the Winding, RGE, Vol.
40, August 1936.
7. Binns, K.J. and P.J., Lawrenson, Analysis and Computation of
Electrical and Magnetic Field Problems, 2nd edition, Pergammon
Press Ltd., Oxford, 1973.
8. Fergestad, R., Electromagnetic Forces in Core-type Transformers
with Concentric Windings, Paper 114, CIGRE, Vol. II, 1956.
9. Knaack, W., The Mechanical Stressing of Transformer Windings
Under Short-Circuit, Paper 135, CIGRE, Vol. II, 1956.
10. Rabins, L., Transformer Reactance Calculations With Digital
Computers, Communications and Electronics, Vol. 75, p. 261, 1956.
11. Kojima, H., H. Miyata, S. Shida and K. Okuyama, Buckling
Strength Analysis of Large Power Transformer Windings Subjected
to Electromagnetic Force Under Short-Circuit, IEEE Trans. on PAS,
Vol. 99, No. 3, p. 1288, May-June 1980.
12. Patel, M.R., Hoop-Stress in Transformer Coils Under Radial Short-
Circuit Forces, IE(I), Electricial Engineering Division. Vol. 61, June
1981.
C HAPTER 8
Cooling Arrangements
C.M. Sharma
1. Winding conductors
2. Directed oil flow washers
3. Insulation cylinders
Radiator
flutes or
oil paths
1
3
1. Radiator headers
2. Radiator elements
3. Radiator disconnecting valves
1 2
3
1. Transformer tank
2. Transformer core and winding
3. Cooling radiators
obvious that it is governed by the height of the tank and the length
of the radiator.
1
Cooling Arrangements
4
1. Cylindrical shell 4. Water box
2. Removable tube stack 5. Safety expansion ring
3. Removable straight tube 6. Radial flow circular baffles
Water inlet
Water outlet
W2 Pd W1
T5 T1
D2 T8 T4 T2 D1
T6
C2 C1
V8 V7
Pr4 T7 Pr3 T3 Pr1
Pr2
O2 V4 V3 O1
Common bus pipe
R2 R1
P2 P1
V6 V2 V1 V5
Tank
tage, that under light load conditions some of the unit coolers can be
cut off, thereby saving the energy consumed by auxiliary fans and
pumps.
3
1
4
3
Figure 8.8 shows the main components of a fan with motor. The
fan blades are bolted on to the hub and the assembly called impeller
is properly balanced to minimise the wear of bearings, vibration and
noise level. The direction of air flow, also referred to as form of
running, is generally away from the motor. The blades are covered
Cooling Arrangements 187
from both top and bottom sides with wire guards, and the whole
assembly is supported on a steel structure when fans are mounted
below the radiators.
for fan supports. A typical fan and support for ground mounted fan
is shown in Fig. 8.8 and fans mounted directly on to radiators are
shown in Fig. 8.9 (Plate 3). It should be ensured that fans mounted
on the radiators do not produce undue vibrations.
Another method of mounting the fans is on the side of the radia-
tors. This is with a view to ensure that the air blown cools elements
of radiators where oil temperature is higher. This arrangement is
used when a number of small capacity fans are used. To accommo-
date a number of fans, rows of fans are formed in the height of the
radiators. Figure 8.10 (Plate 3) shows such an arrangement.
2
1. Pump casing 5. Shaft
2. Window 6. Terminal board
3. Impeller 7. Stator assembly
4. Bearings 8. Rotor assembly
Delivery
6 5
Suction
1 3 4
1 2 3 4 5 6
10 9 8 7
To check the leakage, etc., pipes are tested under very high oil pres-
sure. However, under normal conditions the internal pressure is
very low. Hence, to use the economical size and thickness of pipe, it
is imperative to do stress analysis of the pipe. The stresses in the
pipe under internal pressure may be computed from the following
formula.
PD
f = (8.1)
2t
It has been observed that the medium thin pipes are sufficient for
withstanding internal pressure.
3
1 2
7
Elevation
5 6 1
1. Expansion joint
6 2. Filteration valve
3. Header
5 4. Radiator
5. Butterfly valve
6. Pump
7. Transformer
Plan
head developed by pump is lower than the frictional head, the flow
of oil will reduce, which in turn will reduce the heat dissipation.
Some typical results are compiled and given in Tables 8.1 and 8.2
for OFAF and ONAN cooling respectively. Depending upon the
length of the pipework, number of bends and type of joints and other
fittings, the size of the pipework is selected for each type of cooling.
Depending on the velocity of oil in the pipe, the head losses in vari-
ous components may be computed from Eqs. (8.2) and (8.3), which
are summarized in Table 8.2. However, the driving force required to
make the oil flow inside pipe against frictional head is computed
from the following formula
d LT - d HT
Driving force = H ¥ (8.4)
d MT
The above given procedure is applicable to all types of cooling.
As most of the jobs have mixed cooling arrangements, in order to
decide the diameter of pipe and the optimum number of elements,
the ONAN cooling conditions become the governing criteria.
NOMENCLATURE
f Stress in kg/cm2
D Internal diameter of pipe in cm
P Working pressure in kg/cm2
t Thickness of pipe in cm
Hp Frictional head-loss in pipe length
Hc Frictional head-loss in components
F Frictional constant
L Length of pipe in metres
V Velocity of oil in pipe in m/s
G Gravity constant in m/s2
H Thermal head in cm
dLT Density of oil at lower temperature
dHT Density of oil at higher temperature
dMT Density of oil at mean temperature
Table 8.1 Summary of Pressure Head-Losses in Pipe Assembly in OFAF Cooling
196
For 20 cm dia.
RS Without directed flow 67.91 cm
T With directed flow 67.91 + 1.53 + 28.1 = 97.54 cm
Table 8.2 Summary of Pressure Head-Losses in Pipe Assembly in ONAN Coolings
For 20 cm dia.
RS Without directed flow 3.1507 cms
T With direct flow 3.36 cms
197
C HAPTER 9
Design Procedure
R. C. Agarwal
coils and is also inversely proportional to volts per turn and coil
depth. In order to have specified reactance, increased core diameter
necessitates reduction in coil depth and increase in coil dimensions
in lateral direction, which leads to reduction in core height and
increase in core leg centres. Inspite of reduction in core height due
to increase in core diameter, overall weight of core steel increases,
which also increases no-load loss of transformer. Also, reduced
number of turns in windings even with larger length of mean turn
results in reduced copper weight, which in turn also reduces the
load loss of transformer. Similarly, reduced core diameter results in
reduced core steel weight and no-load loss and increased copper
weight and load loss.
The windings along with its insulations form the electric circuit of
the transformer. Due care must be taken while designing the wind-
ings to ensure its healthiness during normal as well as fault condi-
tions. The windings must be electrically and mechanically strong to
withstand both over-voltage under incidence of surges and me-
chanical stresses during short-circuit conditions. The temperature
of windings at rated, over-load and short-circuit conditions should
be within the limits, ensuring the proper life of transformer.
The power transformers are manufactured for a very wide range
of outputs and voltages and realization of these requirements is pos-
sible only by using different kinds of windings. The following types
of windings are used in power transformers.
(a) Spiral winding
(b) Helical winding
(c) Reversed section winding
(d) Parallel layer winding
(e) Tapered layer winding
(f) Interleaved disc winding
Spiral winding is a medium-current and low-voltage winding.
Tertiary winding, of star/star/delta connected power transformer
202 Transformers, 2/e
(h) Type of voltage variation, i.e. constant flux, variable flux and
mixed type
(i) Power flow requirement, i.e. unidirectional or bi-directional
Constructional details and various types of tapchangers have
been described in Chapter 6.
For this case the actual leakage field, e.g. Fig. 9.1(a) is assumed to
consist of a longitudinal flux of uniform and constant value in the
206 Transformers, 2/e
X =
FG
2p fm 0 Lmt ( AT ) b + b2
a+ 1
IJ ¥ 100 (9.2)
Lc Et H 3 K
where
f = Frequency (Hz)
m0 = Magnetic space constant = 4p ¥ 10–7
Lmt = Mean length of turn of primary and secondary
together (metre)
AT = Ampere-turns per limb of either coil
Lc = Coil length (metre)
Et = Volts per turn
a = Gap between HV and LV windings (metre)
b1 = Lateral dimension of HV winding (metre)
b2 = Lateral dimension of LV winding (metre)
Design Procedure 207
b1 a b2 b¢1 a¢ b¢¢1 a b2
AT AT
1
AT
2
(a) (b)
X =
FG
2p fm 0 Lmt ( AT ) b¢ + b2 + b1¢¢ a¢
a+ 1 +
IJ
¥ 100 (9.3)
Lc Et H 3 4 K
where b¢1 and b≤1 stand for lateral dimension of layers of HV wind-
ings and a¢ is gap between two layers.
KAT KAT
KAT
AT AT AT (1-K) AT KAT
AT
Figure 9.4 shows the simplified case where the end coils have
one-half the turns of the remainder. There will be n HV coils, (n – 1)
LV coils of equal ampere-turns and two LV half-coils. Percentage
reactance between HV and LV can be calculated by the equation
X =
p f m 0 Lmt ( AT ) FG a + b
1 + b2 IJ ¥ 100 (9.4)
n
W Et H 6 K
Design Procedure 209
b1 a b2
Æ
Yoke
The load losses in the transformer consist of losses due to the ohmic
resistance of winding and stray losses. These stray losses take place
in the loaded and unloaded windings, clamping framework and
transformer tank and depend upon leakage flux and magnetic field
surrounding the leads. The total stray loss in the transformer is
generally made up of the following components.
(a) Stray loss in the transformer tank due to leakage flux from
the windings.
(b) Stray loss in the tank due to leads.
(c) Stray loss in the clamping framework due to leakage flux
from the windings.
(d) Stray loss in the clamping framework due to leads.
(e) Stray loss in the loaded windings.
(f) Stray loss in the unloaded windings.
212 Transformers, 2/e
Tank
A
Core
LV HV C
A B
Core yoke
Top shield
Bottom shield
Core yoke
Magnetic Tank
shunt
1.08
5.40
6.48 ¥ 50
324.0
Cooling ducts 6.50 ¥ 49 = 318.5
642.5 ¥ 2
1285
Top and bottom insulation
235
Leg length 1520 mm
LV winding design
Type of winding: Reversed section winding (single coil con-
ceived)
Number of discs = 110
Conductor size = 5112.8 ¥ 7.6 (mm)
Radial paper insulation over conductor
= 0.225 mm
Cooling duct between two discs = 3.70 mm (compressed)
Maximum number of turns in a disc = 3
20,000
Phase current = = 349.92 A
3 ¥ 33
Copper area in coil = 103.65 mm2
Current density in coil = 3.38 A/mm2
Calculating as for HV coil the axial dimension of coil
= 1520 mm (inclusive of 235
mm top and bottom insula-
tion)
Radial dimension of coil = 50 mm (inclusive of building
tolerance)
LV HV Taps
Core dia
515
21 50 44 74 44 29
1.0 1.0
0.1306
Resistance calculations
LV = 21.05 ¥ p ¥ 607 ¥ 310 ¥ 10–6/103.65 = 0.1201 W
HV = 21.05 ¥ p ¥ 819 ¥ 1078 ¥ 10–6/21.96 = 2.6590 W
Taps = 21.05 ¥ p ¥ 1010 ¥ 227 ¥ 10–6/22.88 = 0.6627 W
Total HV resistance at normal tap
162
= 2.6590 + 0.6627 ¥
227
= 3.1319 W
66000
IV turns per phase (N2) = = 914.7
13 ¥ 41.66
Say 914.5
132000
HV turns per phase (N3) = = 1829.4
3 ¥ 41.66
Say 1829
Common Winding turns = 914.5
Series Winding turns = 1829 – 914.5
= 914.5
Trapping turns = 1829 ¥ 0.1
= 182.9 Say 184 (reversing taps)
Current calculations
20,000
LV phase current =
3 ¥ 3 ¥ 11
= 202.02 A
20,000
IV phase current =
3 ¥ 66
= 174.96 A
20,000
HV phase current =
3 ¥ 132
= 87.48 A
Series winding phase current
= 87.48 A
Common winding current = 174.96 – 87.48
= 87.48 A
Series and common windings can be reversed section coils.
Tapping winding can be inter-wound spiral coil placed between
common and series windings or elsewhere depending upon the
impedance variation required. LV winding can be spiral coil.
Design of these coils can be done in a similar manner. While
calculating impedance and other performance, auto factor is to be
used suitably as applicable.
226 Transformers, 2/e
REFERENCES
1. Say, M.G., “Electrical Engineers Reference Book”.
2. “The J & P Transformer Book”.
3. Blume, L.F., A. Boyajian, G. Camilli, T.C. Lennox, S. Minneci,
and V.M. Montsinger, “Transformer Engineering” a Treatise on
the Theory, Operation and Application of Transformers”, Book,
Chapman and Hald Ltd., London, 1951.
4. Say, M.G., “Performance and Design of AC Machines”, Book, Sir
Isaac Pitman & Sons, 1962.
5. Narke, D.V., and R.K. Talwar “Paper on Stray Losses in Power
Transformer” BHEL, Bhopal.
6. Khosla, A.K., Paper on “Recent Trends in the Design of Large Size
Transformers” BHEL, Bhopal.
C H A P T E R 10
Structural Design
of Transformer Tank
M.K. Shakya
S. G. Bokade
Plain tanks are rectangular box type in shape. These tanks may
sometimes also have rounded corners. These are commonly used for
small and medium rating transformers. This type of construction
may however be uneconomical for larger sized tanks, particularly if
the welding is done manually.
Transformer tank
Figure 10.8 shows the rectangular plate supported all around. For
such a plate loaded under uniformly distributed load (udl) p consid-
ering a simply supported beam along longitudinal direction (i.e., in
the direction of l), the bending moment at the centre is given by
Structural Design of Transformer Tank 231
Panel 5
Panel 1
t
I
l
h
Figure 10.8
pbl 2
M = (10.1)
8
The stresses and deflections may be computed by the following for-
mulae
1 2
Zp = bt (10.2)
6
M
fss = (10.3)
Zp
pbl 2
= (10.4)
8 ¥ Zp
5 pbl 4
d= (10.5)
384 EI
Referring to Fig. 10.9, the combined section modulus of plate and
stiffener will now be taken in the above formula as
Z = Zp + Zs (10.6)
I = Ip + Is (10.7)
Consequently, the maximum stresses and the deflection will
be proportionately reduced and these can be computed from the
above formulae by substituting the combined section modulus and
moment of inertia.
Structural Design of Transformer Tank 233
Box stiffener
Combined C.G.
Plate
F I
pb l 2 G
G 1 JJ
f1 = 3
(10.13)
12 I G
GH 1 + K II FH bl IK JJK
xx
1
yy
xx
F I
plb G
G
2
1
JJ
f2 = (10.14)
GH 1 + K II FH bl IK JJK
12 I G yy
3
xx
1
yy
F I
f¢1 =
pb G
2
G 1 JJ (10.15)
2 4
2t G
GH 1 + K FH bl IK JJK
1
F I
pl G2
1 JJ
f¢2 =
2t G
G
2 4
(10.16)
GH 1 + K FH bl IK JJK
1
Subscript 1 for shorter side and 2 for longer side have been used
in the above expressions.
F I
pl b G
G 1 4 JJ
d¢ = (10.17)
K EI G
GH 1 + II FH bl IK
2 yy xx
4 JJ
yy K
F I
d≤ =
pl G
G
4
1 JJ (10.18)
3 4
K Et G
GH 1 + FH bl IK JJK
3
where Eqs. (10.17) and (10.18) are for the deflection of stiffened and
unstiffened plate respectively.
In case of actual transformer tanks, the dimensions are fairly
large and unless one uses very thick plates, one has to stiffen the
different faces by welding stiffeners of suitable sizes, either along
longitudinal or transverse or both the directions, such that the
Structural Design of Transformer Tank 235
H H1
H2 H H1
H H1
H2 H H1
R| ∂f U| R| ∂x ∂y ∂z U| R ∂f U
|| ∂x∂f || || ∂∂xx ∂x
∂y
∂x
∂z
|| ||∂∂xf ||
S| ∂h V| = S
||∂h ∂h ∂h V| S| ∂y V| (10.27)
|| ∂f || ∂x
|T∂z
∂y ∂z || || ∂∂fz ||
T ∂z W ∂z ∂z WT W
or {f, xhz} = [J ] { f, xyz} (10.27a)
The shape functions for eight noded quadrilateral isoparametric
elements are (Fig. 10.15)
1
Ni = (1 + xxi) (1 + hhi)/(xxi + hhi– 1) (10.28)
4
for i = 1, 3, 5
1
Ni = (1 – x 2) (1 + hhi) (10.29)
2
for i = 2, 6
1
Ni = (1 + xxi) (1 – hi2) (10.30)
2
for i = 4, 8
where x, h are the natural coordinates of point of interest and xi, hi
are the nodal coordinates of the node.
240 Transformers, 2/e
7
(–1, 1)
5
(1, 1)
6
(0, 1)
8
(–1, 0)
4
(1, 0)
1
(–1, –1) 3
2
(0, –1) (1, –1)
Once the shape functions are assumed, the next step is to arrive
at expressions for shape fields and displacement fields for element;
which are given by the following expressions in terms of thickness
vector of element
R|X U| 8 R|X ci U| 1 8 R|V xi U|
S|Y V| =  Ni S|Yci V| + 2 z  Ni S|V yi V| (10.31)
i =1 i=1
TZ W TZ ci W TV zi W
where X, Y, Z, are coordinates of a point in element Xci, Yci, Zci, coor-
dinates of a centre point in element
Vxi, Vyi, Vzi, thickness vector in X, Y, Z, direction
N, shape function
u, v, w, displacements
a, b, rotations
z, natural coordinates in third direction
mi, matrix of direction cosines in V1 and V2 vectors
R|u U| 8 R|u ci U| 8 R|a U| i
S| v V| = Â Ni=1
i S| v
ci V| + z /2 Â N t [m ] S V
i=1
i i i
|Tb |W
(10.32)
TwW Tw ci W i
N1 =
1
x (x - 1)
U|
2
N 2 = (1 - x )2
|V (10.41)
1
N 3 = x(1 + x )
||
2 W
where the centroidal axis of stiffener lies along x direction [Refer
Fig. 10.16(a) and (b)].
The displacements are expressed using the above shape
functions.
2
1
3
(a) x
V3
Z
g
V2
a
V1
b
1
2 z
h
3
W x
Y
V
U X
(b)
10.2.13 Results
A typical tank for a large transformer is shown in Fig. 10.18. The
element node relationship for side wall is shown in Fig. 10.19. Due
to symmetry of tank, only half of the tank has been taken. The
results for normal deflections under vacuum pressure are shown in
Fig. 10.20. The contours for major principal stresses at top under
vacuum pressure are plotted in Fig. 10.21. The computer output
provides the information about unsafe elements as well as weld
sizes for stiffener.
244 Transformers, 2/e
Start
Automatic generation of
coordinates of tank,
element node relations, etc.
No Yes
Solution of EQN
Stop
The oil pressure and vacuum testings are conducted on tanks to en-
sure against leakages and to check for strength.
Figure 10.18
Element-node relationship
56 89 122 155 188 221 254
23 220 287
22 22 88 62 121 154 107 140 286
21 106
21 285
55 87 61 153 187 219 253 139
105 138
20 86 60 152 218 284
20
54
99
53
18 103
58 136
84 150 216 282
18
98
–0.1 0.4
–0.2
–0.4
–0.6 0.5
0.6
–0.7 0.7
0.3
0.8
0.2
–0.8 0.2
–0.7
–0.6
–0.5
–0.4
–0.2 0.6 0.3
0.0 0.4
0.4
0.7
0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5
18 17 17 15 14 13 12 11 10 8 6
18 6
19.2 8
–3.5 10
–25 –2.5
–3 –4
–2
–1.5
–4
–3.5
–3
–1.5
–2
–4.5
–3
–2.5 –3.5
–4
–5.0
–4
–5.5
3 –3.5
–3 –3
–2.5
–4 –2–1
–0.0
–4 –1.5
2
–3
–2.5
–2
–1.5
–1
8
9
2 2
7 6 5
3 3 2 1 3
2
s1, 2 = E
e1 + e2 + e3 1
±
FG e 1 -
e1 + e2 + e3 IJ + FG e 2 - e3 IJ (10.42)
3(1 + m ) m H 3 K H 3 K
( e 1 - e 3 )/ 3
Q = tan–1 (10.43)
FG e + e2 + e3 IJ
e1 - 1
H 3 K
where E is Young’s modulus in kg/cm2
e1, e2, e3 are strains in three directions
m is the poisson’s ratio.
Nomenclature
p = Pressure in kg/cm2
b = Width of the plate in cm
l = Longitudinal length of plate in cm
t = Thickness of the plate in cm
E = Young’s modulus in kg/cm2
I = Moment of inertia in cm4
Z = Section modulus in cm3
f = Stress developed in kg/cm2
d = Deflection in cm
fss = Stresses for simply supported plate in kg/cm2
250 Transformers, 2/e
REFERENCES
1. Timoshenko, S. and S. Woinowsky Krieger, “Theory of Plates and
Shells”, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959.
2. Shakya, M.K., “Stress Analysis of Transformer Tanks by Strain
Gauges”, M. Tech. Dissertation, M.A.C.T., Bhopal, 1980.
3. Perry, C.C. and H.R. Lissner “Strainguage Primer”, McGraw-Hill
Book Company, New York, 1962.
4. Cook, R.D., Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1974.
C HAPTER 11
TRANSFORMER AUXILIARIES
The relay serves as main protection for any minor or major faults
that may develop inside a transformer. Such faults always result in
generation of gases which causes the operation of mercury switches
giving signal for audible alarm or isolates the transformer from the
network.
Figure 11.1 (Plate 4) shows the internal view of a relay. It
comprises a cast housing which contains two pivoted buckets, each
bucket being counter-balanced by a weight. Each assembly carries
a mercury switch, the leads from which are taken to a moulded
terminal block.
Operation
The relay is mounted in the pipe at an inclination of 3–7° as shown in
Fig. 11.2. In healthy condition of the transformer, the relay is full of
252 Transformers, 2/e
3 – 7°
1. Tank
2. Conservator
3. Buchholz-relay
oil and both the mercury switches are open. In the event of a minor
fault like damage to core bolt insulation, local overheating, etc., the
arcing causes slow generation of gas in the oil, which passes up in
the pipe and gets trapped in the relay housing. As gas accumulates,
the oil level in the relay falls, leaving the top bucket full of oil.
When a sufficient volume of gas is collected in the relay, the
top bucket, because of its extra weight due to oil contained, tilts,
overcoming the balance weight which closes the mercury switch and
initiates an audible alarm.
With a major fault like short-circuit between turns, coils or
between phases; the generation of gases is rapid and the gas and the
displaced oil surges through the relay and impinges on the baffle
plates, causing the lower assembly to tilt and close the mercury
switch and provide singal for tripping the circuit breaker, which
disconnects the transformer from the network.
Transformer Auxiliaries and Oil Preservation Systems 253
Shock and vibrations acting on tube of the mercury switch can cause
the mercury within it to move and momentarily bridge the switch
contact, even though it may be tilted in open-circuit position. This is
considered to be a mal-operation of the relay, as it is caused by exter-
nal disturbances like earth tremors and not by a fault within the
transformer. Consequently, relays for such situations are provided
with magnet operated reed switches in place of mercury switches.
The external appearance and principle of operation of these relays
is exactly similar to those with mercury switches. The reed type
switches have rhodium contacts located midway along the glass tube
which has an atmosphere of nitrogen.
Capillary
Bulb
Range adjuster
Rack and pinion movement
Movement arm
Potentiometer winding
Side link
Screws
Terminal block
Switch zeroing screw Switch setting screws
Switch platform
10
9
8 1. Base
2. Gasket ring
3. O’ ring
7 4. Diaphragm
5. Cover
6 6. Spring
5 7. Rod retaining spring
8. Switch operating rod
4 9. Flag carrier plate
10. Flag indicator
3
2
1
1. Equalizing pipe
2. Oil inlet hole
3. Deflector diaphragm
4. Slot for air release
4 3
rise and fall of the oil bevel. Its movement gets transmitted to the
switch mechanism by means of bevel gear and magnetic coupling,
which ensures a complete seal between the conservator and switch
compartment. The pointer is also magnetically operated and picks
up the correct oil level.
It is necessary to bring the low and high voltage leads out of trans-
former tank, to be able to make connections between transformer
and generator or transmission lines, etc. This is accomplished by
terminating these leads through what are known as bushings or
cable box.
A bushing is a structure carrying a conductor through a partition
in the tank and insulating the conductor from partition.
7 6 5
1. Float
2. Float arm
4
3. Bevel gear
3 4. Limit stoppers
5. Main body
6. Switch housing
2 7. Mercury switch
1 8. Dial body
9. Driving magnet (for pointer)
10. Cam
11. Driving magnet (main coupling)
12. Driven magnet (main coupling)
13. Magnet with pointer
8 9 10
Schematic
Dial
10
3
2
Pointer 12 11 1
Air Oil
13 9
Figure 11.8 Sectional view and schematic of a magnetic oil level indicator.
7
1
6
8
5
10
Connecting pipe
to transformer
Filling hole
Container
When the
silicagel
becomes pink
regenerator
or change
the silicagel
View glass
Silicagel filling
Strainer
Drain hole
Air inlet
Oil seal
To conser-
vator
Isolating
PVC tube valve
connected + + HP gauge with
to atmosphere one contact
Multi-stage
+ + regulator
10
Isolating
valve
+ +
LP gauge with
two contacts
N2 cylinder N2 cylinder
+ +
+ +
+ 21
+ +
Isolating
valve
+ +
Pressure
relief valve
Oil pump Cabinet
1
1. Shell
2. Trays containing alumina
2
Drain valve
Breather
Oil level
gauge
Drain valve
Breather
and bolted. As oil expands and moves up, it pushes the diaphragm
upwards. The position of the diaphragm is indicated by the oil level
indicator as the oil level indicator connecting rod is connected to the
diaphragm. When the oil level falls down in the conservator, the
diaphragm deflates creating vacuum, which is filled by air getting
sucked through a silicagel breather.
These type of sealing systems have one advantage over the
gas-sealed conservator. If gas is pressurized to a high level, it gets
dissolved in oil. Over a period of time the amount of gas in oil
reaches the saturation point. If at this stage, the load on transformer
is suddenly dropped, or the ambient temperature falls severely, the
pressure falls, oil becomes supersaturated and gas bubbles will be
evolved. If there is a pump connected in the cooling circuit, it will
help generation of bubbles. These bubbles may cause insulation
failure in the region of strong electric fields.
5 6 1
The core forms the magnetic circuit of the transformer. Core is built
up from cold rolled grain oriented, silicon alloy sheet steel of the best
magnetic properties. The material is either received in rolled coil
form or in finished sizes of core sheets, ready for core building. When
the material is received in coil form, it is slitted, cropped and mitred
to the required dimensions based on the design requirements. CNC
machines are now available which can perform the above operations
with perfect control on burrs. The size, type, and construction of the
core, like the number of steps, number of limbs, height, etc. depend
on the number of phases and the size of the transformer.
268 Transformers, 2/e
After relacing of the top yoke, the preparation of the Terminal Gear
Assembly is done as described below:
(a) Cutting of the leads as required.
272 Transformers, 2/e
12.7 Processing
The transformer active part is then taken out and all the terminal
gear cleating of the leads are retightened and the coils are clamped
and secured in position. The transformer tank cover is then placed in
its position and the transformer is now ready for further assembly of
bushings etc.
274 Transformers, 2/e
12.9 Tanking
100
80
60
40
20
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20ppm
Water content in oil
100
1
0.1 1 Weight % 10
Water content X
8 5%
1000
2,5
1
100 0,5
H2O-Partial pressure torr
0,3
10 0,1
0.1
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Temperature°C
the type and ageing properties of the insulation. The upper tempera-
ture limit is set by the maximum permissible drying temperature for
paper, i.e. about 110°C (or 130°C in an oxygen-free atmosphere). Dry-
ing efficiency also depends on diffusion coefficient of the insulation
material. This coefficient is dependent on the material to be dried,
its temperature, pressure and moisture content as shown in Fig.
13.4. A 20°C temperature rise increases the diffusion coefficient by
about 100% and reduces drying time by half.
Two basic processes are adopted for drying of transformers.
(a) Conventional vacuum drying
(b) Vapour phase drying
PRINCIPLES OF DRYING
°C °C
30 120 300 120
110 110
100
20 200
Coefficient of diffusion cm2/day
1 10
0.5 5
0 2.5 5 7.5 10 0 2.5 5 7.5 10
Humidity % Humidity %
(a) (b)
The tank containing core and windings is loaded into the vacuum
vessel. For bell shaped tanks the openings on the top of the tank are
Drying and Impregnation 279
The solvent used should possess the following properties for effective
and efficient drying.
(a) Vapour pressure must be distinctly below that of water, so
that a large pressure difference assists efficient water diffusion
from the beginning of the heating phase (Fig. 13.6).
(b) Evaporation heat should be as high as possible.
(c) The presence of small amounts of the heat-carrier in the solid
or oil insulation must have no effect on their ageing or
general properties.
(d) High ageing stability, allowing practically unlimited use in
the drying process. A solvent storage tank is normally
required to be refilled after a few years.
(e) Flame point should be above 55°C.
The physical properties of solvent vapour and air are given in
Table 13.1.
282 Transformers, 2/e
9 21 22 13
12
20
14 10
16
+–
4
1
18
2
11 5
3 19
19 6
2
17
7
8
15
Torr 1000
5
4
3
2
H2O
100
5
4
3
2
Vapour-pressure
Solvent
10
5
4
3
2
1
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160°C
Saturation temperature
As the heat carrier vapour used in the vapour phase drying system is
inflammable, necessary precautions must be taken to avoid any
possibility of explosion. Maximum allowed leakage rate for a vacuum
vessel is 15 torr litre/s. Due to this reason, it is recommended that
insulation resistance and dielectric dissipation factor of windings be
measured during fine vacuum stage, only when the pressure is less
than 3 torr. Explosion is likely to materialize only in the event of a
sudden, massive leakage of atmospheric air and if temperature and
absolute pressure inside the vessel reach to the potential explosion
range. Figure 13.7 shows the potential explosion range for a mixture
of heat carrier vapour and air.
4
Water
2
101
6
4
2
Solvent
100
6
4
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100°C
Temperature
2
1
Pressure (torr)
Temperature
(a) Preparation
(b) Heating up and drying
(c) Pressure reduction
(d) Fine vacuum
1400
A1
1300
1200
A2
1100
1000
0 24 48 72 96 120144 168192 h
H
1400
A
1300
1200
1400 B
1300
1200
0 24 48 72 h
H
V
REFERENCES
1. Mosser H.P. et al., Transformer Board Special Print of Scientia
Electrica, Translated into English by H. Weidmann, EHV.
Weidmann Limited, St. Johnsbury, Vermont, U.S.A., 1979.
2. Micafil News, Vapour–phase drying of EHV Transformer, MNV 46/le
November 1977, Micafil Limited 8048, Zurich, Switzerland.
3. D.P. Gupta et al., Vapour Phase Drying System for Transformers,
BHEL Journal, Vol. 3 No. 1, 1978.
4. IEC Publication, 422–1973, “Maintenance and Supervision Guide for
Insulating Oils in Service”.
C HAPTER 14
Testing of Transformers
and Reactors
P.C. Mahajan
M.L. Jain
R.K. Tiwari
SECTION I
Following tests are carried out in the works at different stages, be-
fore the core and coil assembly of the transformer is placed in its
tank. These checks help in detecting any fault at an early stage.
3 phase
1N 40 V, 50 Hz
supply
1V
1W
(iii) Measurement of impedance voltage and load loss. The load loss
comprises the sum of the I2R-losses in the windings and the stray
losses due to eddy currents in conductors, clamps and tank. The stray
losses vary with frequency. It is thus important to give supply to the
transformer at the rated frequency. The load loss and impedance
voltage are guaranteed at 75°C but are measured at the ambient
temperature of the test room. Measured load loss is corrected
to reference temperature (75°C). It is known that I2R-losses are pro-
portional directly to resistance, which varies with the temperature.
The stray losses vary inversely with the temperature.
The test is carried out by short circuiting , usually the LV winding
and by supplying the impedance voltage to HV winding. The
measured power will also include small core-loss. Since the supply
voltage during the test is a small fraction of normal voltage, this loss
can be ignored. However, for a high impedance transformer (i.e. Z >
15%) The core-loss may become appreciable and can be deducted
after separately measuring it at impedance voltage.
As per IS : 2026 (Part I)—1977, the measurements can be made at
any current between 25 to 100%, but preferably not less than 50% of
the rated current. Load loss and impedance voltage can be corrected
for rated MVA as below:
Computed loss at rated current
2
= Measured loss at test current ¥
FG Rated current IJ
H Test current K
Test voltage Rated current
%Z = ¥ ¥ 100
Rated voltage Test current
While measuring load loss and impedance at different tap positions,
readings should be taken quickly, and the interval between the mea-
surements at different taps should be adequate to avoid significant
errors due to momentary temperature rise of the windings. The
difference in temperature between the top oil and bottom oil should
preferably be small enough to enable the average temperature to be
determined accurately.
Three-wattmeter method should be used instead of two wattmeter
method to avoid large value of wattmeter multiplier constant.
The power factor during load loss test can be less than 0.1 and
wattmeters suitable for such low power factor should be used.
296 Transformers, 2/e
current loss on rms value of supply voltage. Two voltmeters are used
during the test, a bridge rectifier type to indicate average voltage,
and a dynamometer type to indicate rms voltage. The supply
voltage is set so that the specified value is indicated on the average
voltmeter. With this, hysteresis component of no-load loss will be
measured correctly, whilst the eddy current loss will be either lower
or higher than the true value, depending upon the form factor of the
supply voltage. Since the ratio between the two components is
known for any particular quality of core steel, losses are corrected by
using the following formula:
Pm
P =
P1 + KP2
where P = no-load loss for sinusoidal voltage
Pm = the measured no-load loss
P1 = ratio of hysteresis losses to total iron loss
P2 = ratio of eddy current loss to total iron loss, and
2
K =
FG rms voltage IJ
H 1.11 ¥ average voltage K
For normal flux densities and frequencies of 50 Hz and 60 Hz, P1
and P2 are each 0.5 for grain-oriented steel, and 0.7 and 0.3 respec-
tively, for non-grain-oriented steel.
(v) Measurement of insulation resistance. Insulation resistance is
measured between all windings and the tank with a megger. The
insulation resistance varies inversely with the temperature.
Thus the oil temperature is also recorded. Sometimes insulation
resistance values at 15th and 60th second are noted to determine
polarization index of the insulation system.
(vi) Dielectric tests.
(1) Separate source voltage withstand test. This test is intended
to check the adequacy of main insulation to earth and
between windings.
The line terminals of the windings under test are
connected together and the appropriate test voltage is applied
to them while the other windings and tank are connected
together to the earth. The value of test voltage for fully-
insulated winding is indicated in Table 14.2. Windings with
graded insulation, which have neutral intended for direct
earthing, are tested at 38 kV.
298 Transformers, 2/e
1N 1U 1V 1W
395 kV
3 3 3
4 5 4 5 4 5
6 7 6 7 6 7
8 9 8 9 8 9
10 10 10
35.67 kV
2U 2V 2W 150 Hz
2U2 supply
2.43
2.43 kV kV
–4.86 kV
Figure 14.2 Test circuit for induced over-voltage test (the arrows
indicate the direction of voltage).
300 Transformers, 2/e
(i) Temperature rise test. The test is conducted to confirm that under
normal conditions, the temperature rise of the windings and the
oil will not exceed the specified limit. Temperature rise limits for
oil-immersed type transformers are indicated in Table 14.3.
Table 14.3 Temperature Rise Limits for Oil Immersed Type Transformers
Method (a)
The test should not be regarded as complete until the temperature
rise increment of top oil is less than 3°C in 1 hour. The method
shown in Fig. 14.3 shall be employed for the determination of the
final oil temperature rise.
Method (b)
It should be demonstrated that the top oil temperature rise does
not vary more than 1°C per hour during four consecutive hourly
readings. The last reading is taken for determination of top oil rise.
(iv) Winding temperature rise. When top oil temperature rise is
established, the current is reduced to its rated value and is main-
tained for 1 hour to allow the winding to attain normal temperature.
If the rated current cannot be supplied, the tests can be performed
with a current not less than 90% of the rated current. Following
correction factor is applied to determine the winding gradient
corresponding to rated current.
302 Transformers, 2/e
Temperature
rise (°C)
Final top oil rise
Dq3
Dq3 Dq2
Dq2 Dq1
Dq1
Temperature
Increment 0 Dt Dt Dt Dt Dt
Time in Hr.
Figure 14.3 Method for determining the final temperature rise of oil.
y
Winding gradient = Test gradient ¥
FG Rated current IJ
H Test current K
The value of y for
natural and forced non-directed oil circulation : 1.6
forced-directed oil circulation : 2.0
At the end of the test, the supply is switched off. The cooling fans
or water pumps should be stopped but the oil pumps should remain
running. The short-circuit connection is removed. The value of hot
resistance of the winding is measured by Kelvin’s double bridge or by
Tettex resistance measuring equipment. A certain time, about 3 to 4
minutes, usually elapses between switching off the power supply and
taking the first reading, during which the resistance of winding will
be decreasing. In order to determine the temperature of winding at
the instant of power switch-off, the resistances are measured at in-
tervals over a period of about 15 min. Graph of hot resistance versus
time is plotted, from which winding resistance (R2) at the instant of
shut-down can be extrapolated in the manner shown in Fig. 14.4.
From this value, q 2, the winding temperature at the instant of
shut-down can be determined as below:
R2
q2 = (235 + t1) – 235
R1
Testing of Transformers and Reactors 303
R2
Hot resistance
q
DR1
DR1 DR2
DR2 DR3
DR3
Dt Dt Dt Dt
DR
Resistance O Time, minutes
increment
Figure 14.5 shows the connection for carrying out this test on a
delta-star connected transformer. The line terminals on the star
connected windings are joined together and single-phase supply is
applied between these and the neutral point, the delta terminals
being left floating during this test.
Supply 1N 1U 1V 1W
2U 2V 2W
SECTION II
0.0
Time
Rs Rsi
Cg Ci Cg Ci
Rp
Rsi R
se
ng
Impulse Ma uri
in e as
generator Ci m
rcu ge
Rp it
o lta cuit Z Voltage
Cg Ci V cir 1 divider
g
pin
h op Test U
C it
cu object
cir Ct, Lt Z2
Sh
Chopping
Reference earth
gap
Cg Generator capacitance
Ct Load capacitance (can also be used as divider)
Ct Effective test objest capacitance
Lt Effective test objest inductance
Rsi Internal series resistance
Rse External series resistance
Rp Parallel resistance
Sh Shunt for current measurements
wave front within the specified limits. This is due to the large
capacitance of the transformer, the inherent self-inductance of the
generator and the leads connecting the generator and transformer.
On low-voltage winding of these transformers, it becomes difficult to
obtain the specified wave tail due to extremely low impedance of
these windings.
The effective impedance of transformer controls the wave tail du-
ration. The effective impedance can be varied by different terminal
impedances at the non-impulsed winding terminals. If they are iso-
lated, the effective impedance will be maximum. However, they can-
not be left isolated because high voltages are induced in these wind-
ings. It is desirable that the voltage on terminals that are not being
312 Transformers, 2/e
Rse 1U 1V 1W
Ct
Rp
Z
Cg
Sh
M
Voltage
Reference earth 2U 2V 2W
Current
The flux f increases linearly and reaches after a certain time ts,
the value fs, the saturation flux for the corresponding test voltage.
The impedance of the winding and consequently the test voltage
collapses at saturation. The current in the winding increases rapidly
and reaches the peak value when voltage reaches zero. The higher
the test voltage, the faster is the saturation point reached and conse-
quently shorter becomes the wave duration. Core saturation is,
therefore, the limiting factor for the wave duration. Even a large
source of energy (i.e. high energy rated impulse generator) cannot
prolong the duration of the wave. Biasing magnetically the core
in the opposite direction helps in increasing the wave duration
considerably.
Testing of Transformers and Reactors 315
z U dt = z
f1
df = f2 – f1
Oscillographic Recording
(i) Lightning impulse test. The applied voltage wave and one other
parameter, whose choice depends on the selection of method of
failure detection, are recorded. For best comparison, oscillograms
taken at reduced and full test levels should be recorded to give equal
amplitude by the use of attenuators at the oscilloscope.
Recording of Voltage
(a) Wave shape recording. The preferred sweep time for the wave
front record is 5–10 ms (longer sweep time may be required
when testing transformer neutrals) and for wave tail 50–100
ms.
(b) Test wave recording. For full waves, the sweep time should
not be less than 50 ms and the chopped waves should be
recorded at 10–25 ms sweep.
Recording of Current
The impulse current are normally the most sensitive parameters in
failure detection and record of current waves are the main criteria
of the test result. The use of more than one recording channel at
different sweeps gives better resolution. The criteria for selection of
sweep is
(a) to obtain a clear representation of the oscillations including
the high frequency components near the front of wave;
(b) to be able to detect any discrepancies occurring late in time.
Recording of current at 10 ms and 100 ms sweep covers the above
requirements in general.
(ii) Switching impulse test. During switching impulse test, only
the recording of applied voltage is required. The voltage record
will indicate any fault developed on winding under test or other
non-tested windings.
Testing of Transformers and Reactors 317
Recording of Voltage
(a) Waveshape recording. For the wave front record, a sweep
time 100–200 ms is used. For the wave tail record, by which
the time above 90% is determined, a sweep time of 1000–2000
ms is adequate.
(b) Test wave recording. The sweep time for test wave recording
should be long enough to encompass the first zero passage,
generally a sweep time of 1000–3000 ms is used. Logarithmic
time sweep is also used.
Recording of Current
A switching impulse current comprises three parts:
— an initial current pulse
— a low and gradually rising value of current coincident with
the tail of applied voltage
— a peak of current coincident with any saturation
It is usual to employ the same sweep time as used for voltage record.
REFERENCES
(For Section II)
1. IEC Standard 60076–3. Bureau Central de la Commission
Electrotechnique Internationale, Geneva, Switzerland.
2. IEC Standard 60060–2 and 60060–3. Bureau Central de la
Commission Electrotechnique, Internationale, Geneva, Switzerland.
3. IEEE Guide for Transformer Impulse Tests C57.98 IEEE No. 93
June 1968.
4. Feser, K., Problems Related to Switching Impulse Generation at High
Voltages in the Test Plant—Haefely Publication.
5. Sie, T.H., Switching Surge Tests of Power Transformers—Bulletin
Oerlikon No. 383/384.
6. Switching Surge Tests For Oil Insulated Power Transformers—
IEEE Committee Report, IEEE Trans., PAS 87 No. 2, 1968.
Testing of Transformers and Reactors 321
SECTION III
Consider Fig. 14.11, the ideal case where a single cavity exists within
the dielectric. The cavity can be compared to an air condenser C2.
322 Transformers, 2/e
A A
C2
U Cp
C1
B B
Ck
C
Ca
U P.D. meter
Zm
D
B
On the inception of P.D. in the test object, the voltage across the
terminals A = B will be U – DU at the instant t = 0, because of the
voltage drop D U caused by the charge transfer. However, across the
324 Transformers, 2/e
with
t = Zm
FG C ◊C IJ
k a
HC + C K
k a
the above equation becomes
qm = DU ◊ Ca Ck
Ck + Ca
1
=q◊
FG C
1+ a
IJ
H Ck K
\ The apparent charge
q = qm 1 +
FG Ca IJ = q
m ◊K
H Ck K
The factor K, by which the measured charge has to be multiplied
to obtain the apparent charge, is called the correction factor. It is
observed that this factor is affected by the circuit characteristics,
especially by the ratio of the test object capacitance to that of the
coupling capacitor.
For each new test object, the correction factor is determined by
calibration of the P.D. instrument with the test object connected in
the circuit. A calibration charge of known magnitude q0 is injected
between the terminals A–B and the calibration charge q0m indicated
on the P.D. measuring instrument is registered.
q0
The correction factor is then calculated as K = .
q 0m
HV
N
L
Zm
Discharge
detector ~
LV
(PDD)
Typical circuit arrangement for P.D. test is shown in Fig. 14.15. The
connections shown are for the HV line terminal and the neutral
326 Transformers, 2/e
HV
IV
L L
Zm Zm
PDD PDD
~
LV
Figure 14.16 indicates the time sequence of the test voltage, as per
IS : 2026.
The test voltages between line and neutral terminals are ex-
pressed in P.U. of Um/ 3 as follows:
LV LV
N N
HV HV
Um Um Um Um 0.5 Um 0.5 Um
3 Um 3 Um 1.5 Um
(a) (b)
1W 1V 1U Matching unit
Matching unit
2W 2V 2U M1 M2
PDD
(c)
U
5 sec
U1
5 min 30 min
U2
level. When the voltage is raised, the unearthed metallic objects ly-
ing in the surrounding area can also cause disturbances, as they
behave as floating potential points. It is, therefore, desirable that as
far as possible, the surrounding area should be free from loosely-
lying metallic parts which are not necessary for the test.
The disturbances caused by electromagnetic fields of rotary ma-
chines, rectifiers, radio transmitters, etc., can be effectively checked
by proper shielding of the laboratory, which acts as a Faraday cage.
This also proves to be a very effective measure for carrying out P.D.
measurements, without the need for often very lengthy and trouble-
some search for causes of disturbances.
Above all, the high voltage connections also should be made dis-
charge free, and the sharp points should be properly shielded using
corona control rings or shields.
Ultrasonic signals
Tank wall
Transducer
Ultrasonic Magnetic
detector tape
unit recorder
Discharge source
Electrical
signal
Input
3
2
(a)
20 mm sec.
3
(b)
(c)
PC PC
U U
t
t
PC
PC
U U
t
t
PC
PC
U U
t
t
Bad contacts
PC
U
t
REFERENCES
(For Section III)
1. Specification for Power Transformers IS : 2026 (Part III)—1977.
2. Partial Discharge Measurements, IEC Publication 60270.
3. Methods for PD Measurement, IS : 6209—1998.
4. Nieschwietz, H. and Stein, W. Partial Discharge Measurements as
Means of Quality Control of High-Voltage Power Transformers,
Conference on Partial Discharge in Electrical Insulation, April 1976,
Bangalore.
5. The Prachauser: Locating Partial Discharges in High Voltage
Equipment, ibid.
6. “Measurement of Partial Discharges in Transformers” Electra,
No. 19, Nov. 1971, pp 13-65.
7. Recognition of Discharges—Electra, No. 11, pp 61-98.
8. Mora, P. and J. Poittevin, Location of Partial Discharges in the
Transformers to be Detected with the Help of Ultrasonic Waves.
Testing of Transformers and Reactors 335
SECTION IV
(iii)Measurement of loss
(iv) Inter-turn over voltage withstand test
(v) Separate source voltage withstand test
(vi) Measurement of insulation resistance of windings
(vii) Partial discharge measurement (as applicable)
(viii) Lightning impulse voltage withstand test (routine and type
test)
(ix) Switching impulse voltage withstand test (as applicable).
then
Wf t 235 + t2
Wfr = Wr ¥
Wt 235 + t1
The reactor is tested at the specified test level. The test voltage is
applied between the line and neutral terminals joined together and
the earth for 60 s.
3-phase supply
2 4 3
When the neutral terminal of winding has been designed for impulse
withstand voltage, it is verified by applying an impulse voltage
through any one of the line terminals or through all three line termi-
nals of a three-phase winding connected together. The neutral ter-
minal is connected to earth through an impedance and the voltage
amplitude developed across this impedance, when the impulse
applied to the line terminal, is equal to the rated withstand voltage of
the neutral terminal.
Alternatively, an impulse test corresponding to the rated with-
stand voltage of the neutral is applied directly to the neutral, with all
line terminals earthed. In this case, a longer duration of the front
time is allowed, up to 13 microseconds.
~ 0.95 ◊ (I2R)N
with Ku = 2.0
P1 (hot-spot) ~ 1.69 ◊ (I2R)N
It remains to be checked, how the static shields, if used, would
behave. Their losses would go up by the square of test voltage,
independent of frequency.
In a gapped core reactor, the same basic relations apply, but the
distribution of fringing flux around the air gaps and consequently,
the local winding eddy losses are greatly dependent on design.
Testing of Transformers and Reactors 345
3-phase supply
2 1
5 3 4 7
6
3-phase supply
CN
1 2
R4
C4
3 4 5
REFERENCES
(For Section IV)
1. IEC Publication 289 (1989); Reactors.
2. IS : 5553 Part II—1989; Shunt reactors.
3. BS : 4944: 1973—Specification for Reactors, Arc-suppression Coils
and Earthing Transformers for Electric Power Systems.
4. NEMA Standard Publication No. TR 1—1971: Transformers, regu-
lators and reactors.
5. Sollergren B., Special Report for Group 12 (Transfomers); CIGRE, Vol.
1970.
6. Grundmark B., High Voltage Shunt Reactors—Trends in Design and
Testing. Report 12—03 Ibid.
7. De Bourg H. and others, Calorimetric Loss Measurement On
Alternators and Reactors, Report No. 119; CIGRE Vol. 1964.
350 Transformers, 2/e
SECTION V
I� = I ¥ 2 ¥ k
where I = symmetrical short-circuit current
k = accounts for initial offset of test current
2 = conversion factor for rms to peak value;
k ¥ 2 is called peak factor and depends on X/R ratio
where X = sum of reactances of the transformer and system
(Xt + Xs) in ohms
R = sum of resistances of the transformer and system
(Rt + Rs) in ohms
If system impedance is taken into account and X/R ratio of the
system is not known, then X/R ratio of transformer is considered.
Value of factor k ¥ 2 for different X/R ratios as given in standards
are I:
X/R 1 1.5 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 14
k¥ 2 1.51 1.64 1.76 1.95 2.09 2.19 2.27 2.38 2.46 2.55
Normally, X/R ratio is >14 hence
(1) For Category I transformers, k ¥ 2 = 1.8 ¥ 2 , i.e. 2.55
(2) For Category II and Category III transformers, k ¥ 2 = 1.9 ¥
2 i.e. 2.69
Zs
S
S
Zs
Zs
1- phase
AC supply
Zs
S
Zs S
1-phase
AC supply
Zs S
315 MVA, 3-phase 250 MVA, 3-phase 200 MVA, 1-phase 100 MVA, 3-phase
50 Hz auto- 50 Hz generator 50 Hz generator 50 Hz auto-
transformer ONAN/ transformer ONAN/ transformer transformer
ONAF/OFAF cooled ONAF/OFAF cooled OFWF cooled ONAN/ONAF cooled
1. No-Load Ratio at 400/220/33 kV 15.75/420 kV 21/400 kV 220/110/11 kV
Principal Tap 3
2. Connection Symbol YN, a0, d11 YN, d11 YN, d11 when connected YN, a0, d11
in 3-phase bank
3. Lightning Impulse
Transformers, 2/e
315 MVA, 3-phase 250 MVA, 3-phase 200 MVA, 1-phase 100 MVA, 3-phase
50 Hz auto- 50 Hz generator 50 Hz generator 50 Hz auto-
transformer ONAN/ transformer ONAN/ transformer transformer
ONAF/OFAF cooled ONAF/OFAF cooled OFWF cooled ONAN/ONAF cooled
Standards on Power
Transformers
V.K. Lakhiani
S.K. Mahajan
15.1.1 State-of-the-Art
IS: 2026 was first published in 1962 and covered initially natural
cooled oil-immersed transformers. By subsequent amendments (a
total of 8 in number) forced cooled transformers were included, use
of synthetic liquids as coding medium was permitted and require-
ments for minimum windings were incorporated.
The first revision was brought out in 1977 with a view to bringing
it in line with the revision of IEC Publication 76—1967, which was
revised in 1976.
At present the requirements for power transformers are covered
in five parts as follows:
PART I : 1977 General (First Revision)
PART II : 1977 Temperature Rise (First Revision)
PART III : 1981 Insulation levels and dielectric tests
(Second Revision)
PART IV : 1977 Terminal markings, tappings and connec-
tions (First Revision)
PART V : 1994 Transformer/Reactor bushing minimum
electrical clearances in air.
The second revision to Part III published in 1981. This revision
was exactly in line with IEC 76-3 (1980). However since then IEC 76-3
has undergone changes and now available as IEC 60078-3 (2000) :
Insulation levels, dielectric tests and external clearances in air. In
this version of IEC 60076-3 following new major points have been
introduced compared to IEC 76-3 (1980)
— Long duration AC (ACLD) test as a special test for 72.5 < Um
£ 170 kV and Routine test for Um > 170 kV
— LI is routine test for Um > 72.5 kV
— SI is routine test for Um > 170 kV
— Short duration AC (ACSD) as routine test for Um £ 170 kV and
special test for um > 170 kV
— Short duration AC (ACSD) test with P.D. for Um > 72.5 kV
— Induced over voltage test/P.D. test are not called and instead
ACLD and ACSD tests have been introduced.
360 Transformers, 2/e
Part I
(a) The kVA ratings have been extended to an unlimited range in
the same series.
(b) Dry-type transformers have been covered.
(c) Terminology is now covered by IS : 1885 (Part xxxviii)–1977
‘Electrotechnical Vocabulary : Transformers’ (first revision).
(d) The reference ambient temperatures have been revised.
Maximum ambiet air temperature and maximum daily
average ambient air temperature have been increased by 5°C
to 50°C and 40°C, respectively. Concept of maximum yearly
weighted average ambient temperature has been introduced
and a hot-spot temperature of 98°C over this weighted
temperature of 32°C has been recognized, thereby giving a
66°C hot-spot rise.
(e) The requirements with regard to ability to withstand short-
circuit have been revised. A test under the category of ‘Special
Test’ for assessing the dynamic ability of the transformer
to withstand short-circuit has been included. The thermal
ability to withstand short-circuit has to be demonstrated by
calculation and the duration of the symmetrical short-circuit
current to be used for the calculation of the thermal ability to
withstand short-circuits has been specified as 2 s.
In fact, IEC 60076 has a separate Part 5 on this subject,
but in case of IS : 2026 (1977) the same has been clubbed with
Part I.
(f) Tolerances on losses, impedance voltage, etc., have been
revised. No-load current is also made a subject of guarantee
with +20% tolerance. The component losses have +15%
tolerance, while the total losses have +10% tolerance.
Impedances at taps other than those at principal tapping have
more tolerance than applicable for principal tapping by a
Standards on Power Transformers 361
Part II
(a) Identification of transformers according to cooling methods
has been lined up with the international practice of specifying
by 4 letters, e.g., ONAN, ONAF, OFAF, ODAF, OFWF, etc.
(b) Directed flow type cooling has been recognized and has 5°C
more permissible winding temperature rises.
(c) The temperature limits are the same as those in IEC 60076-
2 (1993) viz. 100°C for top oil and 105/110°C for winding,
depending upon whether non-directed oil circulation or
directed oil circulation is adopted. As deviation from IEC, 5°C
more rises have been permitted for water cooled trans-
formers.
(d) Temperature rise limits are now valid for all tappings. For
multi-winding transformers, the temperature rise of the top
oil refers to the specified loading combination, for which the
total losses are the highest. Individual winding temperature
rises shall be considered relative to that specified loading
combination, which is the most severe for the particular
winding under consideration.
(e) Total losses to be fed for temperature-rise test should not be
less than 80%. Similarly, rated current should also be not less
than 90%. Values of indices ‘x’ and ‘y’ for the correction of oil
rise and gradient have also been revised.
362 Transformers, 2/e
Part III
(a) Below 300 kV, insulation requirements and dielectric
withstand tests are the same as before. Lightning impulse
test continues to be the type test. The other dielectric tests
are separate source power-frequency voltage withstand test
(for line terminals in case of uniform insulation and for
neutral terminal in case of non-uniform insulation) and
induced over-voltage withstand test, both to be performed as
routine tests. During the induced over-voltage test, at least
twice the rated voltage should appear across the winding,
having uniform insulation but in case of winding with graded
insulation, the line terminals must receive rated voltage
according to related table and excessive voltage between line
terminals is avoided. Neutral raising is allowed if it is so
designed. An impulse test for the neutral terminal is a special
test if a rated impulse withstand voltage for the neutral
terminal has been specified. A longer duration of the front
time up to 13 ms is allowed for the impulse test on a neutral
terminal.
(b) For voltage class ≥ 300 kV, there are two alternative methods
for specifying and testing the dielectric requirements, viz.
method 1 and method 2.
Method 1 is the same as applicable to voltage class < 300
kV, non-uniform insulation, except that lightning impulse
test is a routine test.
Method 2 introduces newer tests like switching impulse
and partial discharge measurement. According to this method,
the verifying dielectric tests are:
(i) Lightning impulse test for the line terminals (routine
tests)
Standards on Power Transformers 363
(ii) Switching impulse test for the line terminals (routine test)
(iii) Separate source power-frequency voltage withstand test
for the neutral (routine test)
(iv) Induced power-frequency voltage withstand test with
partial discharge measurements (routine test)
(v) Impulse test on the neutral, if specified (special test)
(c) Test levels for method 1 are available up to 420 kV class and
for method 2 they are given up to 765 kV class. It is expected
that beyond 420 kV class, method 2 will be normally chosen.
(d) In case of switching impulse test which is intended to verify
the switching impulse voltage withstand of the line terminals
to earth and between line terminals in case of three-phase
transformers, 1.5 times rated test voltage appears between
line terminals according to prescribed test circuit. This test is
much more severe regarding higher phase-to-phase oil and
air clearances.
(e) Impulse test whether routine test or type test, is to be
conducted on all the three phases of a three-phase trans-
former. In fact, each phase is to be tested such that one phase
is in the maximum, another in the principal and the third in
the minimum voltage-tap position.
(f) Chopped wave impulse test is now a special test. Application
of shots in case of chopped wave test is more stringent now,
since two chopped waves are to be followed by two full waves,
as against one full wave as before.
(g) The rules for highest voltage winding apply to the trans-
former in toto. Transformer is to be designed and tested
according to one method alone, either by method 1 or method
2 and not by combination of the two methods for different
windings. Method of test should be known right at the enquiry
stage.
Part IV
(a) The phase marking ABC have been replaced by UVW
following the international practice.
(b) The corresponding IEC Pub 76-4 (1976) does not contain the
information concerning terminal markings and the same is
now included in IEC 60076-1.
364 Transformers, 2/e
This standard is based on IEC 60296 (1986), which covers two classes
of oil, class I and class II. Two classes have been included in the IEC
366 Transformers, 2/e
(iv) Rated power (in kVA) and for tapping ranges exceeding ±5%
required power on extreme tappings.
(v) Rated voltages for each winding.
(vi) Connection symbol.
(vii) Requirement of on-load/off-circuit tapchangers or links—
number of tappings, tapping range, location of tappings,
particular voltage required to be varied and whether constant
flux/variable flux/combined voltage variation.
(viii) Impedance voltage at rated current and principal tapping for
different pairs of windings and at least on the extreme
tappings in case of parallel operation if required.
(ix) Indoor or outdoor type.
(x) Type of cooling and if different types of cooling involved, rated
power for each type of cooling.
(xi) Temperature rises and ambient temperature conditions
including altitude and in case of water cooling chemical
analysis of water.
(xii) Number of cooling banks, spare capacity if any and number of
standby cooling pumps/fans.
(xiii) Highest system voltage for each winding.
(xiv) Method of system earthing for each winding.
(xv) Whether windings shall have uniform or non-uniform
insulation, and in case of non-uniform insulation, power
frequency withstand voltage of neutral and impulse withstand
level if an impulse test on the neutral is required.
(xvi) For windings having system highest voltage greater than
300 kV, the method of dielectric testing, whether method 1 or
method 2.
(xvii) Withstand voltage values constituting insulation level of line
terminals, viz. test levels of lightning impulse, switching
impulse, one minute power frequency, long duration power
frequency with partial discharge measurement, wherever
applicable.
(xviii) Limitation of transport weight and moving dimensions and
special requirements, if any, of installation, assembly and
handling.
(xix) Whether a stabilizing winding is required.
370 Transformers, 2/e
APPENDIX I
(a) Specifications
has become brittle and cracked and it is, therefore, possible for a
transformer to continue to operate long after the mechanical life of
its insulation has been virtually used up, unless it is subjected to
excessive mechanical stresses like short-circuit, handling or other
mechanical shocks. It is known to users of transformers that many
times a transformer which has been giving satisfactory service for
years, when shifted to other location has failed due to damage to its
weakened insulation. It does not follow, therefore, that a trans-
former will fail when its insulation becomes brittle. However, if it is
subjected to some excessive stresses, it may fail even before the
mechanical strength is completely used up.
Insulation is deteriorating and losing its life all the time, depending
upon the temperature at which it is operating. Therefore, it becomes
necessary to understand the various factors which contribute to the
deterioration of insulation; especially the temperature and laws
relating to ageing of insulating materials, so that a transformer can
be put to optimum use without too rapid a loss of life, resulting in
premature failure.
16 X103
15
14
13
12
11
10
Tensile strength
6
5
2 0.
27 0.1 0.055
1% % wa
1.1
%
2.2%
1 ter
%
0
200 400 600 800 1000 2000 3000
Hours of ageing at 120°C
= 2(qc – qcr)/6
= 2(qc – 98)/6
or qc = 98 + 19.93 log10 V (3)
If a transformer operating at hot-spot of qc uses up one day’s life
(based on concept of normal life at 98°C hot spot) in t hours:
t = 24/V
= 24 ¥ 10(98–qc)/19.93 (4)
Values of q c for various values of t in hours are given in Table 16.1:
t, hr/day qc
24 98
16 101.5
12 104
8 107.5
6 110
4 113.5
3 116
2 119.5
1.5 122
1.0 125.5
0.75 128
0.5 131.5
Relative rate
q°C of using life
5
80 0.125
86 0.25
92 0.50
98 1.00
4
104 2.0
110 4.0
116 8.0
3 122 16.0
(Normal) 1
0
80 86 92 98 104 110 116
Winding hot-spot temperature, °C
383
°C
1 1
New Delhi:– 20 to 21
82 82
20
Source: IMD thermograph
No. 100/65
10
5
1 1
20 21
82 82
0 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2 4 6 8 Hrs
°C
New Delhi
40
Source: IMD clomato-
logical table
30
Mean of mean monthly 25.2 °C
(Annual mean)
20
10
J F M A M J JY A S O N D Months
(Jan. to Dec.)
Daily variation
Max. ambient variation
Annual mean
A M J JY A S o N D J F M Months
(April to March)
IS : 2026 IEC–76
1. Max. ambient air temperature 50°C 40°C
2. Max. daily average air temperature 40°C 30°C
3. Max. yearly weighted air temperature 32°C 20°C
4. Max. cooling water temperature 30°C 25°C
5. Average cooling water temperature in a day 25°C —
Also, for ready reference, temperature rise limits for oil immersed
transformers with class A insulation as specified in IEC 76-2 (1976)
and IS : 2026 (Part II)–1977 are:
Table 16.4
Winding
0.8 X
Temperature
Oil
t
Ambient
Load
6 12 18 24
Time Hrs
Temperature
ing
ind
W
Oil
ient
Amb
Oil
Ambient
Load
6 12 18 24
Time
Av. WDG
rise (top)
Dqwo Hot-spot
Top oil
Top of WDG
0.1Dqwo
Bottom oil
Bottom of WDG
Temp. rise
Dqwo–Diff. between AV. WDG rise & AV. oil rise
K2
K1 K1
Hot-spot temp.
104
Hot-spot temperature, °C
Hot-spot temp.
92
86
0 12 24
Time, Hrs
qext qmax.
Extreme Mean of daily max
maximum in a month over several years
over several years Envelopes of daily
maximas, for several years
daily mean
Envelopes of daily
minimas, for several years
qmean
qmin
Mean of mean max. & min.
Mean of daily min. (monthly mean)
over several years
1 week 2 week 3 week
Month
12
11
10
9
B
Correction factor °C
8 A
n
7 a tio
ari on
6 lv iati
o ida ar
us linev
5 Sin ht
aig
4 Str
3
2
1
0
10 20 30 40 50
Temperature range °C
6 k = correction
y = range K = 0.5
5 Weighted
Correction ‘c’ in °C
ambient
4 h1
h2
K = h1/h2 K = 1.0
3 H
2 K = 2.0
5 10 15 20 C°
Range ‘d’ in °C
% of Sr
(rated New Delhi
load)
120
90
J F M A M J JY A S O N D
Months (Jan. to Dec.)
qa
New Delhi
40
30 Annual weighted
ambient
20 Weighted ambient
monthly
10
0
J F M A M J JY A S O N D
Months (Jan. to Dec.)
Figure 16.13
LM 1 10
N
q a / 20
OP
= 20 log10
MN N Â
1 PQ (5)
Loading and Life of Transformers 399
Once the weighted ambient has been determined for a given loca-
tion, the corresponding loading capabilities of a transformer can be
worked out from the following relationship between weighted ambi-
ent, oil and winding rises and load.
qc = qa + Dqb0 + (Dqb – Dqb0) (1 – e–t/t ) + (Dqcr – Dqbr)k2y
x
D qb = Dqbr
F 1 + dk I
2
GH 1 + d JK
where
qa = Weighted ambient temperature (cooling medium)
qc = Winding hot-spot temperature at K load = qa + Dqc
qcr = Winding hot-spot temperature at rated load
Dqc = Winding hot-spot temperature rise at K load
Dqcr = Winding hot-spot temperature rise at rated load
qbo = Original oil temperature
qb = Top oil temperature at K load = qa + Dqb
qbr = Top oil temperature at rated load
Dqb = Top oil temperature rise at load K
Dqbr = Top oil temperature rise at rated power
t= Time duration in hours of any load power
t= Oil-air thermal time constant of transformer at rated load,
in hours
400 Transformers, 2/e
S
K = Ratio of any load/rated load =
Sr
S1
K1 = Ratio of initial load/rated load =
Sr
S2
K2 = Ratio of permissible load/rated load =
Sr
x = Exponent for oil rise
y = Exponent for winding rise
d = Ratio of load loss at rated load/no-load loss (Assumed 5 for
the guides)
a = Subscript representing ambient (cooling medium)
b = Subscript representing top oil
c = Subscript representing hot-spot of winding
r = Subscript representing rated value
From the equation, the permissible load can be worked out by
substituting the values for the various parameters. For convenience,
a load versus weighted ambient curve has been plotted (Fig. 16.14)
which applies to ONAN/ONAF/OFAF cooling with nondirected flow
in transformers with or without conservator or sealing. Following
similar lines of approach, other weighted ambient versus load curves
can be drawn for different types of transformer coolings as above
relationship is universal and applicable to any type of cooling.
140
130
110 IS:
660
0
IEC
IEC ONAN/ONAF
354
90
OFAF/OFWF
32°C ONAN/ONAF
0°C 10°C 20°C 30°C 40°C
Weighted ambient
correction of 5°C will be more conservative for places near the sea,
where temperature variations are less than the plains. Annexure III
is based on the above approach and could be used for optimizing the
use of transformers in the 48 locations. Similar loading tables can be
worked out for another 180 locations in India from the available tem-
perature records in the IMD climatological tables, of observatories in
India (1931-60).
Loading guides for power transformers date back to 1942 with very
little change in basic philosophy. In the currently published guides,
the emphasis is still on a long-time end of life failure mode associated
with the thermal deterioration of mechanical and dielectric proper-
ties of solid insulation in the windings. The useful life of a trans-
former has been arbitrarily equated to the loss of 50% of the initial
tensile strength of winding conductor insulation. Consumption of life
may be calculated according to equations or tables given in the
guides based on Arrhenius type relationship between the degrada-
tion rate and temperature. Although there are other stresses like
mechanical, dielectric and thermal produced by stray fluxes, which
increase with MVA rating of transformers, consideration of these
stress factors has generated an agreement in the industry, that a
reasonable point of separation for the loading guide would be 100
MVA. The present guides, therefore, are limited. In the available
408 Transformers, 2/e
for ONAN, if fans are not working and rated power for ONAF
if fans are working. Similarly, transformers with both ONAN
and OFAF cooling can be dealt with.
(h) Tables in the loading guides give permissible cyclic daily duty
with a normal life consumption of 24 hr per day, equal to that
consumed during 24 hr at 98°C hot-spot. If actual load
diagram has two or more periods of high load separated by
periods of low load, the high-load time can be taken as the
sum of all high-load times. This condition of intermittent high
loads is less onerous than single overload for the same total
time.
(i) For a given load cycle, and given ambient conditions, tables
can be used to determine the rating of the transformer
needed for the load.
With the knowledge of relative rate of use of life at any hot-spot tem-
perature as discussed in Sec. 16.3 of this chapter, for practical pur-
poses, consumption of life on any day could be worked out for a trans-
former for any loading and ambient condition by integrating the con-
sumption of life based on the record of readings of the winding tem-
perature indicator at regular intervals over the day. The winding
temperature indicator indicates thermal image of the winding hot-
spot temperature and can be considered sufficiently accurate when it
is corrected to the actual measured values based on temperature
rise test on the transformer. In adopting this approach, care should
be taken to ensure:
(a) Oil temperature and winding temperature at any point of
time do not exceed the specified limits of 115°C and 140°C
respectively.
(b) Upper limit of load as dictated by the loading limits of other
associated components shall not be exceeded. In any case,
loads above 150% of the rated are special emergency
conditions.
(c) Process of life integration when done manually should be over
a day, in such a way that resultant consumption of life is
related to one day’s life at 98°C hot-spot (Normal day).
410 Transformers, 2/e
From the above table it will be seen that against the normal al-
lowed consumption of life of 24 hr actual consumption has been 22.69
hr, which leaves a balance of 1.31 hr of unused life.
In the guides to the loading, the load diagrams have been simplified
into low-load and high-load periods. Based on the value of weighted
ambient qa, appropriate loading tables in the guide can be used.
However, if qa lies between two tables, either select the nearest one
above or interpolate between the closest two tables.
For transformers rated for both ONAN and ONAF cooling, for
ONAN cooling use appropriate tables in terms of the rated power for
ONAN cooling, and in terms of the rated power of ONAF cooling, if
the fans are brought into operation. Similarly, transformers with
ONAN and OFAF cooling will be dealt with or without oil pumps in
operation.
It is recommended that pumps and fans are put into service before
the overloading occurs, in order to have the winding hot-spot tem-
perature low enough to slow down the ageing process. The power
taken by these auxiliaries is at least partially compensated for by the
decrease in load loss, resulting from a low temperature. Following
worked out examples will help towards a better understanding of the
concept of life and loading:
Method 1
The permissible load curve vis-a-vis weighted ambient is given in
Fig. 16.14 (also refer Annexure II, Sheet 2). This is based on addition
of a flat correction of 5°C on the mean monthly ambient to obtain
monthly weighted ambient and corresponding permissible load from
curve in Fig. 16.14.
Method 2
The monthly weighted ambients can be determined by adding cor-
rections worked out on the basis of IMD records (Ref. Annexure II,
Sheet 3) and permissible load from curve in Fig. 16.14. This method
permits slightly higher overloads than method 1.
REFERENCES
1. Equivalent Ambient Temperature for Loading Transformers by W.C.
Sealey of Allis Chalmers (USA).
2. Transformer Engineering, A Treatise On Theory, Operation and
Application of Transformers by GE (USA).
3. Transformers for Electric Power Industry by Westinghouse (USA).
4. IS : 2026 : Specification for Power Transformers.
5. IS : 6600 : Guide for Loading of Power Transformers.
6. Kulkarni H.R., Paper on Standardization of Ambient Temperatures.
7. IEC Loading Guide for Oil Immersed Transformers, IEC publication
354.
8. Gupta D.P., and L.C. Awasthy, Weighted Ambient Temperature as the
Basis for Loading Transformer, read in CBIP Research Session at
Jaipur.
9. Progress Report on a Guide for Loading Power Transformers Rated in
excess of 100 MVA, IEEE Paper Vol. PAS 100, 8 Aug. 1981.
414 Transformers, 2/e
ANNEXURE I
Correction Factors
Sheet No. 1
A. 1.1 Correction Factor for Sinusoidal Variation
where q = qm sin h
H = 2p
Therefore, Eq. (i) can be re-written as
2p
1
2x/6 =
2p z
0
2q m
sin h / 6
dh (ii)
q m sin h q sin 2 h
2qm sin h/6 = 1 + loge 2 + m (loge 2)2 + ....
6 62 – 2
x
Base
H
A
qm
Figure A1.1
Loading and Life of Transformers 415
Sheet No. 2
A.1.2 Correction Factor for Straight Line Variation
A similar approach as above can be followed for working out a correction for
straight line variation also.
In the case of straight line variation as shown in Fig. A.1.2, at any instant
the value of q can be written as
2q m
q = h
H
(value of h at any instant must bear the correct sign). If x is the weighted
ambient temperature (correction over base temperature), it can be repre-
sented by the following relationship:
1 +H / 2 q /6
2x/6 =
H z-H / 2
2 ◊ dh
2q m h
(i)
1 +H /2
or 2x/6 =
H z
-H /2
2 6H
◊ dh (ii)
2q m
Function h can be expanded and written as follows by ignoring
6H
higher powers of qm :
2q m 4q 2m (log e 2) 2 2
22qm/6H ¥ h = 1 + (loge2) h + h + ....
6H 36 H 2 2
Substituting value of 22q mh/6H in Eq. (ii) and solving for x:
x = 19.93 log10(1 + 0.0022 q 2m) (iii)
for convenience of working, results have been plotted as curve A of Fig. 16.11.
+qm
–H/2
+H/2
–qm
Figure A.1.2
416 Transformers, 2/e
Sheet No. 3
2(qm – x)/6 =
1 RS z h1
2qm / 6 dh + z H
2 (qm - y)/6 dh
UV (i)
H T 0 h1 W
Assuming h1/h2 = K and rewriting Eq. (i)
1
2(qm – x)/6 = {2qm/6 kh2 + 2(qm – y)/6h2}
(1 + k)h2
2qm / 6
= {k + 2–y/6} (ii)
1+ k
y
Expanding 2y/6 = 1 + log 2 + ... = 1 + 0.115 y
6
Rewrite Eq. (ii) as
RS
2–x/6 = 1 -
1 UV
T (1 + k)(1 + 8.7 / y) W
x = – 19.93 log 1 -
RS 1 UV (iii)
T (1 + k)(1 + 8.7 / y) W
For convenience, working results have been plotted as curves in Fig. 16.12.
Weighted ambient
qm
h1 h2
H
Figure A.1.3
Loading and Life of Transformers 417
ANNEXURE II
Sheet No. 1
Location - Agra Annexure-II
Source - IMD Table Page 115 Sheet No-1
Sr.
No. Description J F M A M J JY A S O N D Annual
A. Mean of daily max. 22.7 25.7 31.9 37.7 41.8 40.5 34.8 32.8 33.2 33.3 29.2 24.1 32.3°C
B. Mean of daily min. 7.4 10.3 15.7 21.6 27.2 29.5 27.0 25.8 24.6 19.1 12.0 8.2 19.0°C
C. Mean monthly 15.1 18.0 23.8 29.6 34.5 35.0 30.9 29.3 28.9 26.2 20.6 16.2 25.7°C
D. Max of variation in 2.9 5.8 5.8 4.8 0.5 4.1 1.6 0.4 2.7 5.6 4.4 1.4
Mean in the month
E. Mean of highest in 27.2 31.5 37.8 42.5 45.4 45.0 40.7 35.9 36.5 36.4 33.0 28.1
the month over
several years
F. Max. daily variation 21.4 21.2 22.2 21.0 21.4 16.0 18.0 12.8 12.4 14.8 20.4 22.4
2 ¥ (E – C – D/2)
G. Correction for ‘D’ 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 – 0.1 – – – 0.2 0.2 –
H. Correction for ‘F’ 1.9 1.9 2.1 1.8 1.9 1.1 1.4 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.7 2.1
80% of curve
I. Weighted ambient
C+G+H= 17.1 20.1 26.1 31.6 36.4 36.2 32.3 29.9 29.5 27.3 22.5 18.3
G + H assumed 5°C = (20.1) (23.0) (28.8) (34.6) (39.5) (40.0) (35.9) (34.3) (33.9) (31.2) (25.6) (21.2)
variation in one
whole year
V|
F max. 22.4°C W Total correction = 4.7°C
L. Annual weighted
C+J+K= 25.7 + 4.7 = 30.4°C
Daily (30.7°C)
Values in (c)
F max
by adding 5°C
D J correction
A E Mean monthly
CB Monthly Yearly
Plot 30 days Plot 12 months
418 Transformers, 2/e
Sheet No. 2
Location : Bombay Annexure II
Source : IMD table, Page 211 Sheet No. 2
Ser.
No. Description J F M A M J JY A S O N D Annual
A. Mean of daily max. 29.1 29.5 31.0 32.3 33.3 31.9 29.8 29.5 30.1 31.9 32.3 30.9 31.0
B. Mean of daily min. 19.0 20.3 22.7 25.1 26.9 26.3 25.1 24.8 24.7 24.6 22.8 20.8 23.6
C. Mean of monthly 24.2 24.9 26.8 28.7 30.1 29.1 27.4 27.2 27.4 28.2 27.6 25.8 27.3
D. Max. variation in 0.7 1.9 1.9 1.4 1.0 1.7 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.6 1.8 1.6
Mean in the month
E. Mean of highest 33.0 33.9 35.0 34.8 34.6 34.4 31.8 31.1 31.7 35.1 34.8 33.7 36.7
in the month over
several years
F. Max daily variation 16.8 16.0 14.4 10.8 8.0 9.0 9.0 7.6 7.8 13.2 12.6 14.2
2 ¥ (E – C – D/2)
G. Correction from ‘D’ – – – – – – – – – – – –
H. Correction for ‘F’ 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.6 0.8
80% of curve
I. Weighted ambient 25.4 26.0 27.7 29.1 30.3 29.4 27.7 27.4 27.6 28.9 28.2 26.6
C+G+H= (29.2) (29.9) (31.8) (33.7) (35.1) (34.1) (32.4) (32.2) (32.4) (33.2) (32.6) (30.8)
J. Correction for
max. variation in
mean (monthly)
over one whole
year
C max – C min. 30.1 – 24.2 = 5.9°C CF = 0.2°C
:
K. Correction for
max. daily
variation over
one whole year
F max. 16.8°C
CF = 1.2°C
Total corr. 1.4°C
L. Annual weighted
C+J+K=
Daily 28.7°C
(32.3°C)
F max
D J
A E Mean monthly
CB Monthly Yearly
Plot 30 days Plot 12 months
Loading and Life of Transformers 419
Sheet No. 3
Location – New Delhi Annexure - II
Source :- IMD table page 127 Sheet No-3
Sr.
No. Description J F M A M J JY A S O N D Annual
A. Mean of daily max. 21.3 23.6 30.2 36.2 40.5 39.9 35.3 33.7 34.1 33.1 28.7 23.4 31.7
B. Mean of daily min 7.3 10.1 15.1 21.0 26.6 28.7 27.2 26.1 24.6 18.7 11.8 8.0 18.8
C. Mean monthly 14.3 16.8 22.6 28.6 33.5 34.3 31.2 29.9 29.4 25.9 20.2 15.7 25.2
D. Max. variation in 2.5 5.8 6.0 4.9 0.8 3.1 1.3 0.5 3.5 5.7 4.5 1.4
mean in the month
E. Mean of highest in 27.0 29.6 35.8 41.2 44.3 44.1 40.3 37.2 37.0 36.3 32.4 26.0 44.9
the month over
several years
F. Max. daily variation 23.0 19.8 20.4 20.2 20.8 16.4 17.0 14.2 11.7 15.2 20.0 19.2
2 ¥ (E – C – D/2)
G. Correction for D – 0.1 0.1 0.1 – 0.1 – – 0.1 0.1 0.1 –
H. Correction for F 2.2 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.1 1.3 0.8 0.5 1.0 1.7 1.6
80% of curve
I. Weighted ambient 16.5 18.6 24.5 30.5 35.4 35.5 32.5 30.7 30.0 27.0 22.0 17.3
C+G+H=
J. Correction for
max. variation in
mean (monthly)
over one whole
year.
C max – C min: 34.3 – 14.3 = 20°C CF = 2.6°C
:
K. Correction for
max. daily
variation over 23.0°C CF = 2.2°C
:
one whole year
F. max Total correction = 4.8
F max
D J
A E Mean monthly
CB Monthly Yearly
Plot 30 days Plot 12 months
420 Transformers, 2/e
Sheet No. 4
Location : Srinagar Annexure II
Source IMD table page 131 Sheet No– 4
Sr.
No. Description J F M A M J JY A S O N D Annual
A. Mean of daily max. 4.4 7.9 13.4 19.3 24.6 29.6 30.8 29.9 28.3 22.6 15.5 8.8 19.5
B. Mean of daily min. –2.3 – 0.8 3.5 7.4 11.2 14.4 18.4 17.9 12.7 5.7 – 0.1 – 1.8 7.2
C. Mean monthly 1.0 3.6 8.4 13.4 17.9 21.7 24.6 23.9 20.5 14.2 7.7 3.5 13.4
D. Max. variation in 2.6 4.8 5.0 4.5 4.5 3.8 2.9 0.7 3.4 6.3 6.5 4.2
mean in the month
E. Mean of highest 9.4 13.7 20.1 26.3 31.5 34.4 35.5 34.0 32.6 28.5 20.4 14.4 36.0
in the month over
several years
F. Max. daily
variation
2 ¥ (E – C – D/2) 14.2 15.4 18.4 21.4 22.8 21.6 18.8 19.4 20.8 22.2 19.0 17.6
G. Correction for D – 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 – – 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1
H. Correction for F 0.8 1.0 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 1.6 1.3
80% of curve
I. Weighted Ambient
C+G+H= 1.8 4.7 10.0 15.4 20.1 23.8 26.2 25.6 22.4 16.4 9.5 4.9
J. Correction for
max variation
in mean (monthly)
over one whole
year
C max – C min 24.6 – 1.0 = 23.6 CF = 3.3°C
:
K. Correction for
max daily
variation over
CF = 2.1°C
one whole year 22.8°C
F. Max 5.4
F max
D J
A E Mean monthly
CB Monthly Yearly
Plot 30 days Plot 12 months
ANNEXURE III
Loading Table Transformers ONAN/ONAF Cooled (To IS : 2026)
Sheet No. 1
Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
Cochin 100 100 98 98 99 100 101 101 101 100 100 100 100
Dehradun 113 111 107 102 98 98 100 101 102 104 109 112 104
Dhanbad 108 105 101 96 95 96 99 99 99 101 104 107 101
Gauhati 108 106 103 101 100 99 98 98 98 101 104 107 102
Hissar 112 109 104 99 94 92 95 96 97 101 106 111 102
Hyderabad 104 102 100 97 95 98 101 101 101 102 104 105 101
Jabalpur 108 106 102 98 93 95 100 100 100 102 106 108 102
Jaipur 111 108 103 98 94 94 97 99 99 101 105 109 102
Jammu 113 110 105 100 95 93 96 98 98 102 106 111 102
421
Notes: Safe loads for transformers based on Weighted Ambient (Figures in %).
Sheet No. 2
422
Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
Poona 105 103 101 98 97 100 102 102 102 101 103 105 102
Puri 104 102 100 98 97 97 98 98 98 99 102 104 100
Ramagundam 102 101 97 93 91 94 99 99 99 99 102 103 98
Shillong 116 114 110 107 106 105 105 105 106 109 113 116 109
Simla 120 118 115 111 107 106 108 108 109 112 115 117 112
Srinagar 124 122 117 113 108 104 102 102 105 112 117 122 113
Surat 103 102 99 96 96 97 99 99 99 98 100 102 99
Tiruchy 102 100 98 96 95 95 95 97 97 99 101 102 98
Trivandrum 100 100 99 98 99 100 101 101 100 100 100 100 100
Vizag 103 102 100 98 96 96 98 98 98 99 102 103 100
Notes: Safe loads for transformers based on Weighted Ambient (Figures in %).
Sheet No. 3
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 31.1 35.6 42.8 45.0 47.2 48.3 45.6 42.2 40.6 41.1 36.1 30.0 48.3
qmax 22.7 25.7 31.9 37.7 41.8 40.5 34.8 32.8 33.2 33.3 29.2 24.1 32.3
qmin 7.4 10.3 15.7 21.6 27.2 29.5 27.0 25.8 24.6 19.1 12.0 8.2 19.0
1. Agra qmean 15.1 18.0 23.8 29.6 34.5 35.0 30.9 29.3 28.9 26.2 20.6 16.2 25.7
qa 20.1 23.0 28.8 34.6 39.5 40.0 35.9 34.3 33.9 31.2 25.6 21.2 30.7
% Rated
Load 111 108 102 97 92 92 96 98 98 101 105 110 101
qext . 36.1 40.6 43.9 46.2 47.8 47.2 42.2 38.9 41.7 42.8 38.9 35.6 47.8
qmax 28.7 31.0 35.7 39.7 40.7 38.0 33.2 31.8 33.1 35.6 33.0 29.6 34.2
qmin 11.9 14.5 18.6 23.0 26.3 27.4 25.7 24.6 24.2 21.2 16.1 12.6 20.5
2. Ahmedabad qmean 20.3 22.75 27.2 31.35 33.5 32.7 29.4 28.2 28.6 28.4 24.6 21.1 27.4
qa 25.3 27.8 32.2 36.4 38.5 37.7 34.4 33.2 33.6 33.4 29.6 26.1 32.4
% Rated
Load 106 103 100 96 94 94 98 99 98 99 102 105 100
qext 31.7 35.6 41.7 44.6 45.6 45.6 44.4 40.0 40.6 38.9 35.0 31.1 45.6
qmax 22.2 25.3 30.7 35.9 39.5 38.1 33.2 30.9 32.1 32.9 28.9 24.4 31.2
Loading and Life of Transformers
qmin 7.3 9.9 15.7 21.9 27.3 27.7 25.6 24.3 23.7 17.8 10.9 7.7 18.3
3. Ajmer qmean 14.8 17.6 23.2 28.9 30.7 32.9 29.4 27.6 27.9 25.4 19.9 16.0 24.8
qa 19.8 22.6 28.2 33.9 35.7 37.9 34.4 32.6 32.9 30.4 24.9 21.0 29.8
% Rated
Load 111 108 103 98 96 94 98 99 99 102 106 110 102
423
Sheet No. 4
424
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 31.1 36.1 41.7 45.0 47.2 47.8 45.6 40.0 39.4 40.6 35.6 31.3 47.8
q max 23.7 26.7 33.3 38.8 42.1 39.8 33.6 32.6 32.8 32.6 29.0 24.8 32.4
qmin 9.1 11.6 17.0 22.5 27.4 28.9 26.6 26.0 25.2 20.4 13.1 9.3 19.8
4. Allahabad qmean 16.4 19.2 25.2 30.6 34.8 34.4 30.1 29.3 29.0 26.5 21.0 17.0 26.1
qa 21.4 24.2 30.2 35.6 39.8 39.4 35.1 34.3 34.0 31.5 26.0 22.0 31.1
% Rated
Load 110 107 102 96 92 93 97 98 98 100 105 109 101
qext 28.9 33.9 41.7 45.0 47.8 47.8 46.7 43.9 40.6 39.4 35.6 29.4 47.8
q max 20.8 23.8 29.6 36.2 40.8 40.5 35.2 33.8 35.4 33.2 28.6 23.2 31.8
qmin 6.8 8.5 14.1 19.7 24.9 27.3 26.0 25.4 23.9 16.4 10.2 7.1 17.5
5. Ambala qmean 13.8 16.2 21.8 28.0 32.8 33.9 30.6 29.6 29.6 24.8 19.4 15.2 24.6
qa 18.8 21.2 26.8 33.0 37.8 38.9 35.6 34.6 34.6 29.8 24.4 20.2 29.6
% Rated
Load 112 110 104 99 94 93 96 97 97 102 107 111 102
Transformers, 2/e
qext 25.0 32.2 35.6 43.3 46.1 46.7 45.6 40.0 40.6 38.3 32.2 27.7 46.7
q max 18.6 22.6 27.5 34.2 38.9 40.4 35.6 34.2 34.4 31.9 26.5 24.4 30.5
qmin 4.5 6.5 11.5 16.2 21.4 25.2 25.9 25.3 23.8 16.6 8.8 5.0 15.9
6. Amritsar qmean 11.6 14.6 19.5 25.2 30.2 32.8 30.8 29.8 28.8 24.2 17.6 13.2 23.2
qa 16.6 19.6 24.5 30.2 35.2 37.8 35.8 34.8 33.8 29.2 22.6 18.2 28.2
% Rated
Load 114 111 107 102 97 94 96 97 98 102 108 113 102
Sheet No. 5
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 32.2 34.4 37.2 38.3 38.9 37.8 33.3 33.3 33.3 32.2 31.1 31.1 38.9
q max 26.9 29.7 32.3 33.4 32.7 28.9 27.2 27.3 27.6 27.5 26.3 25.7 28.8
qmin 15.0 16.5 19.0 21.2 21.1 19.7 19.2 19.2 18.9 18.9 17.2 15.3 18.4
7. Bangalore qmean 21.0 23.1 25.6 27.3 26.9 24.3 33.2 23.2 23.2 23.2 21.8 20.5 23.6
qa 26.0 28.1 30.6 32.3 31.9 29.3 28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 26.8 25.5 28.6
% Rated
Load 105 102 101 100 100 102 103 103 103 103 104 105 102
qext 35.6 41.7 43.3 45.9 46.7 45.6 40.0 37.2 41.1 41.7 38.3 36.1 46.7
q max 30.1 32.4 36.6 39.9 40.7 37.2 32.4 31.5 32.6 35.0 33.4 31.0 34.4
qmin 10.8 12.7 16.6 21.7 26.1 27.1 25.4 24.8 24.1 19.9 14.3 11.4 19.6
8. Baroda qmean 20.4 22.6 26.6 30.8 33.4 32.2 28.9 28.2 28.4 27.4 23.8 21.2 27.0
qa 25.4 27.6 31.6 35.8 38.4 37.2 33.9 33.2 33.4 32.4 28.8 26.2 32.0
% Rated
Load 106 102 100 96 94 95 98 99 99 100 102 105 100
qext 33.3 37.2 39.4 39.5 40.6 37.2 32.0 31.7 33.9 33.6 32.8 34.6 40.6
q max 30.1 32.2 35.0 35.7 34.0 27.5 25.2 25.6 27.0 30.1 29.3 29.3 30.1
Loading and Life of Transformers
9. Belgaum qmin 14.0 15.1 18.0 19.5 20.6 20.6 19.8 19.4 19.0 18.6 17.1 13.9 18.0
qmean 22.0 23.6 26.5 27.6 27.3 24.0 22.5 22.5 23.0 24.4 23.2 21.6 24.0
qa 27.0 28.6 31.5 32.6 32.3 29.0 27.5 27.5 28.0 29.4 28.2 26.6 29.0
% Rated
Load 104 102 100 99 100 102 103 103 103 102 103 104 102
425
Sheet No. 6
426
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 32.2 36.1 40.0 44.2 45.6 43.9 40.6 35.0 36.1 37.8 33.3 32.8 45.6
q max 25.7 28.5 33.6 37.8 40.7 36.9 29.9 28.6 30.1 31.3 28.5 26.1 31.5
qmin 10.4 12.5 17.1 21.2 26.4 25.4 23.2 22.5 21.9 18.0 13.3 10.6 18.5
10. Bhopal qmean 18.0 21.5 25.4 29.5 33.6 31.2 26.6 25.6 26.0 24.6 20.9 18.4 25.0
qa 23.0 26.5 30.4 34.5 38.6 36.2 31.6 30.6 31.0 29.6 25.9 23.4 30.0
% Rated
Load 108 105 102 98 93 96 100 101 101 102 105 108 102
qext 31.1 37.2 42.8 47.2 49.4 48.9 47.2 43.3 43.9 42.2 37.2 32.2 49.4
q max 22.3 26.1 31.8 37.6 42.0 41.7 38.9 36.1 36.6 35.3 30.3 24.7 33.6
qmin 5.0 8.2 14.4 20.8 27.2 29.3 28.0 26.6 25.2 18.6 10.0 5.6 18.2
11. Bikaner qmean 13.6 17.2 23.1 29.2 34.6 35.5 33.5 31.4 30.9 27.0 20.2 15.2 25.9
qa 18.6 22.2 28.1 34.2 39.6 40.5 38.5 35.4 35.9 32.0 25.2 20.2 30.9
% Rated
Load 112 109 103 98 92 91 94 97 96 100 106 111 210
Transformers, 2/e
qext 35.0 38.3 39.7 40.6 36.2 37.2 35.6 32.3 35.0 36.6 36.2 35.1 40.6
q max 29.1 29.5 31.0 32.3 33.3 31.9 29.8 29.5 30.1 31.9 32.3 30.9 31.0
qmin 19.4 20.3 22.7 25.1 26.9 26.3 25.1 24.8 24.7 24.6 22.8 20.8 23.6
12. Bombay qmean 24.2 24.9 26.8 28.7 30.1 29.1 27.4 27.2 27.4 28.2 27.6 25.8 27.3
qa 29.2 29.9 31.8 33.7 35.1 34.1 32.4 32.2 32.4 33.2 32.6 30.8 32.3
% Rated
Load 102 102 100 98 97 98 100 100 100 99 99 101 100
Sheet No. 7
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 31.9 36.7 41.1 43.3 43.7 43.9 36.7 36.1 36.1 35.6 33.9 30.6 43.9
qmax 26.8 29.5 34.3 36.3 35.8 34.1 32.0 32.0 32.3 31.8 29.5 27.0 31.8
qmin 13.6 16.5 21.5 25.0 26.5 26.7 26.3 26.3 26.1 23.9 18.4 14.2 22.1
13. Kolkata qmean 20.2 23.0 27.9 30.6 31.2 30.4 29.2 29.2 29.2 27.8 24.0 20.6 27.0
qa 25.2 28.0 32.9 35.6 36.2 35.4 34.2 34.2 34.2 32.8 29.0 25.6 32.0
% Rated
Load 106 103 99 96 96 97 98 98 98 99 102 105 100
qext 35.0 36.7 39.3 40.0 39.4 38.3 35.6 35.6 35.8 36.1 34.4 35.0 40.0
qmax 29.7 32.2 34.7 34.6 33.5 30.5 29.0 29.9 30.7 30.4 29.3 28.9 31.1
qmin 19.2 20.2 22.1 23.4 23.6 22.5 22.0 22.1 22.0 22.0 21.1 19.6 21.7
14. Coimbatore qmean 24.4 26.2 28.4 29.0 28.6 26.5 25.5 26.0 26.4 26.2 25.2 24.2 26.4
qa 29.4 31.2 33.4 34.0 33.6 31.5 30.5 31.0 31.4 31.2 30.2 29.2 31.4
% Rated
Load 102 101 99 98 98 100 101 101 101 101 102 102 101
qext 35.6 38.9 42.8 45.0 47.7 47.2 40.0 37.2 36.7 36.7 35.0 33.3 47.7
qmax 28.9 31.5 35.9 38.3 38.8 35.8 31.6 31.6 32.2 32.0 30.1 28.4 32.9
Loading and Life of Transformers
15. Cuttack qmin 15.7 18.2 22.1 25.3 26.9 26.5 25.6 25.6 25.5 23.7 18.8 15.5 22.5
qmean 22.3 24.8 29.0 31.8 32.8 31.2 31.2 28.6 28.8 27.8 24.4 22.0 27.7
qa 27.3 29.8 34.0 36.8 37.8 36.2 33.6 33.6 33.8 32.8 29.4 27.0 32.7
% Rated
Load 104 102 98 95 94 96 98 98 98 99 102 104 99
427
Sheet No. 8
428
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 33.3 34.0 34.4 34.1 34.6 32.7 31.7 32.2 31.1 32.2 32.8 32.8 34.6
qmax 30.6 30.7 31.3 31.4 30.9 29.0 28.1 28.1 28.3 29.2 29.8 30.3 29.8
qmin 23.2 24.3 25.8 26.0 25.7 24.1 23.7 24.0 24.2 24.2 24.1 23.5 24.4
16. Cochin qmean 26.9 27.5 28.6 28.7 28.3 26.6 25.9 26.0 26.2 26.7 27.0 26.9 27.1
qa 31.9 32.5 33.6 33.7 33.6 31.6 30.9 31.0 31.2 31.7 32.0 31.9 32.1
% Rated
Load 100 100 98 98 99 100 101 101 101 100 100 100 100
qext 26.1 29.2 37.2 40.6 42.8 43.9 40.6 37.2 34.4 36.1 30.1 27.2 43.9
qmax 19.1 21.4 26.4 32.1 36.2 35.3 30.4 29.5 29.6 28.2 24.7 20.9 27.8
qmin 6.1 8.2 12.4 17.0 21.5 23.6 23.1 22.7 21.3 16.1 10.3 7.00 15.8
17. Dehradun qmean 12.6 14.8 19.4 24.6 28.8 29.4 26.8 26.1 25.4 22.2 17.5 14.0 21.8
qa 17.6 19.8 24.4 29.6 33.8 34.4 31.8 31.1 30.4 27.2 22.5 19.0 26.8
% Rated
Load 113 111 107 102 98 98 100 101 102 104 109 112 104
Transformers, 2/e
qext 32.2 38.3 40.6 43.9 46.1 46.1 36.7 36.1 35.6 35.6 32.8 30.6 46.1
qmax 24.7 27.4 33.2 37.6 38.8 35.9 31.2 30.8 31.2 30.6 27.8 25.2 31.1
qmin 12.1 14.5 19.2 23.5 25.9 25.9 24.8 24.8 24.3 21.7 15.6 12.4 20.4
18. Dhanbad qmean 18.4 21.0 26.2 30.6 32.4 30.9 28.0 27.8 27.8 26.2 21.7 18.8 25.8
qa 23.4 26.0 31.2 35.6 37.4 35.9 33.0 32.8 32.8 31.2 26.7 23.8 30.8
% Rated
Load 108 105 101 96 95 96 99 99 99 101 104 107 101
Sheet No. 9
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 28.9 35.0 38.3 40.6 41.1 36.7 37.2 37.8 37.2 35.6 32.2 29.4 41.1
q max 24.0 26.3 30.2 31.6 31.0 31.5 32.1 32.2 32.1 30.5 27.7 24.9 29.5
qmin 11.0 12.8 16.5 20.3 22.7 24.7 25.8 25.8 25.2 22.0 16.9 12.5 19.7
19. Guahati qmean 17.5 19.6 23.4 26.0 26.9 28.1 29.0 29.0 28.6 26.2 22.3 18.7 24.6
qa 22.5 24.6 28.4 31.0 31.9 33.1 34.0 34.0 33.6 31.2 27.3 23.7 29.6
% Rated
Load 108 106 103 101 100 99 98 98 98 101 104 107 102
qext 30.6 34.4 45.6 47.9 48.3 47.8 47.2 43.3 42.2 41.7 36.7 33.6 48.3
q max 21.7 25.0 30.7 37.0 41.6 41.3 37.3 35.5 35.7 34.6 29.6 24.1 32.8
qmin 5.5 8.1 13.3 19.0 24.6 27.7 27.3 26.1 23.9 17.4 9.8 6.0 17.4
20. Hissar qmean 13.6 16.6 22.0 28.0 33.1 34.5 32.3 30.8 29.8 26.0 19.7 15.0 25.1
qa 18.6 21.6 27.0 33.0 38.1 39.5 37.3 35.8 34.8 31.0 24.7 20.0 30.1
% Rated
Load 112 109 104 99 94 92 95 96 97 101 106 111 102
qext 35.0 37.2 42.2 43.3 44.4 43.9 37.2 36.1 36.1 36.7 33.9 33.3 44.4
q max 28.6 31.2 34.8 36.9 38.7 34.1 29.8 29.5 29.7 30.3 28.7 27.8 31.7
Loading and Life of Transformers
qmin 14.6 16.7 20.0 23.7 26.2 24.1 22.3 22.1 21.6 19.8 16.0 13.4 20.0
21. Hyderabad qmean 21.6 24.0 27.4 30.3 32.4 29.1 26.0 25.8 25.6 25.0 22.4 20.6 25.8
qa 26.6 29.0 32.4 35.3 37.4 34.1 31.0 30.8 30.6 30.0 27.4 25.6 30.8
% Rated
Load 104 102 100 97 95 98 101 101 101 102 104 105 101
429
Sheet No. 10
430
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 32.8 37.2 41.1 45.6 46.7 46.1 41.7 35.0 35.6 36.7 33.9 32.8 46.7
q max 26.1 28.9 34.0 38.5 41.9 37.6 30.3 29.5 30.8 31.4 28.9 26.9 32.1
qmin 9.8 11.4 15.5 20.5 25.9 26.4 23.9 23.6 23.1 18.4 11.7 9.0 18.3
22. Jabalpur qmean 18.0 20.2 24.8 29.5 33.9 32.0 27.1 26.6 27.0 24.9 20.3 18.0 25.2
qa 23.0 25.2 29.8 34.5 38.9 37.0 32.1 31.6 32.0 29.9 25.3 23.0 30.2
% Rated
Load 108 106 102 98 93 95 100 100 100 102 106 108 102
qext 31.7 36.7 42.8 44.9 47.8 47.2 46.7 41.7 41.7 40.0 36.1 31.1 47.8
q max 22.0 25.4 30.9 36.5 40.6 39.2 34.1 31.9 33.2 33.2 29.0 24.4 31.7
qmin 8.3 10.7 15.5 21.0 25.8 27.3 25.6 24.3 23.0 18.3 12.0 9.1 18.4
23. Jaipur qmean 15.2 18.0 23.2 28.8 33.2 33.2 29.8 28.1 28.1 25.8 20.5 16.8 25.0
qa 20.2 23.0 28.2 33.8 38.2 38.2 34.8 33.1 33.1 30.8 25.5 21.8 30.0
% Rated
Load 111 108 103 98 94 94 97 99 99 101 105 109 102
Transformers, 2/e
qext 26.7 31.7 37.2 43.9 46.1 47.2 45.0 41.7 38.3 37.2 32.5 27.2 47.2
q max 18.4 21.1 26.4 33.1 39.0 40.4 35.4 33.2 33.3 31.4 26.2 21.1 30.0
qmin 8.3 10.6 14.8 20.5 25.8 27.7 26.0 25.1 23.9 19.4 13.4 9.3 18.7
24. Jammu qmean 13.4 15.8 20.6 26.8 32.4 34.0 30.7 29.2 28.6 25.4 19.8 15.2 24.4
qa 18.4 20.8 25.6 31.8 37.4 39.0 35.7 34.2 33.6 30.4 24.8 20.2 29.4
% Rated
Load 113 110 105 100 95 93 96 98 98 102 106 111 102
Sheet No. 11
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 33.3 37.8 43.3 45.6 47.2 47.8 45.6 42.2 40.6 40.6 36.1 32.8 47.8
q max 24.1 27.5 33.5 38.9 42.6 40.4 33.5 31.7 32.5 33.3 29.7 25.5 32.8
25. Jhansi qmin 9.2 11.7 17.4 23.3 28.8 29.3 25.9 24.9 24.1 19.5 13.1 9.3 19.7
qmean 16.6 19.6 25.4 31.1 35.7 34.8 29.7 27.9 28.3 26.4 21.4 17.4 26.2
qa 21.6 24.6 30.4 36.1 40.7 39.8 34.7 32.9 33.3 31.4 26.4 22.4 31.2
% Rated
Load 109 106 102 96 91 92 97 99 99 101 105 109 101
qext 25.0 28.3 33.3 37.2 37.5 37.8 32.8 33.3 33.3 33.3 29.4 28.3 37.8
q max 17.8 20.7 25.2 28.9 30.4 29.5 28.5 28.5 28.1 26.3 22.7 19.1 25.5
26. Kathmandu qmin 1.9 4.0 8.0 11.5 15.9 19.1 20.1 19.9 18.6 13.5 7.4 3.0 11.9
(Nepal) qmean 9.8 12.4 16.6 20.2 23.2 24.3 24.3 24.2 23.4 19.9 15.0 11.0 18.7
qa 14.8 17.4 21.6 25.2 28.2 29.3 29.3 29.2 28.4 24.9 20.0 16.0 23.7
% Rated
Load 116 114 109 106 103 102 102 102 103 106 111 115 107
qext 35.0 38.9 43.3 45.0 47.2 46.7 39.4 37.8 37.2 37.4 33.9 33.4 47.2
q max 31.0 33.6 36.8 39.0 41.3 37.6 32.6 32.2 32.6 32.5 30.6 30.1 34.2
Loading and Life of Transformers
qmin 17.6 20.0 23.1 25.9 28.1 27.2 24.9 24.7 24.4 22.9 19.1 16.7 22.9
27. Khammam qmean 24.3 26.8 30.0 32.4 34.7 32.4 28.8 28.4 28.5 27.7 24.8 23.4 28.6
qa 29.3 31.8 35.0 37.4 39.7 37.4 33.8 33.4 33.5 32.7 29.8 28.4 33.6
% Rated
Load 102 100 97 95 92 95 98 99 98 99 102 103 98
431
Sheet No. 12
432
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 33.9 38.3 42.8 45.6 47.8 47.8 47.2 41.1 40.6 41.1 37.2 33.9 47.8
q max 24.5 28.5 34.1 39.0 42.6 40.3 33.3 31.7 33.1 34.5 30.8 26.7 33.3
28. Kota qmin 10.6 13.1 18.5 24.4 29.7 29.5 26.4 25.4 24.7 21.0 14.8 11.3 20.8
qmean 17.6 20.8 27.3 31.7 36.2 34.9 29.8 28.6 28.9 27.8 22.8 19.0 27.0
qa 22.6 25.8 32.3 36.7 41.2 39.9 34.8 33.6 33.9 32.8 27.8 24.0 32.0
% Rated
Load 108 105 100 95 91 92 97 98 98 99 103 107 100
qext 36.1 38.9 41.7 44.4 45.6 44.4 38.3 37.8 37.8 38.3 36.1 34.4 45.6
q max 31.3 34.3 37.5 39.3 40.0 35.6 32.5 32.1 31.9 32.4 31.0 30.3 34.0
29. Karnool qmin 17.0 19.3 22.5 26.0 27.2 25.0 23.8 23.5 23.3 22.4 19.2 16.6 22.1
qmean 24.2 26.8 30.0 32.6 33.6 30.3 28.2 28.5 28.3 27.4 24.2 21.6 27.1
qa 29.2 31.8 35.0 37.6 38.6 35.3 33.2 33.5 33.3 32.4 29.2 26.6 32.1
% Rated
Load 102 100 97 94 93 97 99 99 99 100 102 104 100
Transformers, 2/e
qext 30.6 35.0 41.7 45.6 47.2 48.3 45.6 38.9 39.4 40.0 35.0 33.3 48.3
q max 23.3 26.4 32.9 38.3 41.2 39.3 33.6 32.5 33.0 32.8 29.3 24.8 32.3
30. Lucknow qmin 8.9 11.5 16.3 21.8 26.5 28.0 26.6 26.0 25.1 19.8 12.7 9.1 19.4
qmean 16.1 19.0 24.6 30.1 33.8 33.6 30.1 29.2 29.0 26.3 21.0 17.0 25.8
qa 21.1 24.0 29.6 35.1 38.8 38.6 35.1 34.2 34.0 31.3 26.0 22.0 30.8
% Rated
Load 110 107 102 97 93 93 97 98 98 101 105 109 101
Sheet No. 13
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 28.9 33.3 41.1 46.1 48.3 47.9 47.8 44.4 41.7 40.0 35.0 29.4 48.3
qmax 20.2 23.3 29.0 36.0 41.2 41.1 36.0 34.7 35.3 33.9 28.8 22.9 31.9
qmin 5.8 8.4 12.9 18.5 24.2 27.1 26.7 26.1 23.9 17.5 10.1 6.2 17.3
31. Ludhiana qmean 13.0 15.8 21.0 27.2 32.7 34.1 31.4 30.4 29.6 25.7 19.4 14.6 24.6
qa 18.0 20.8 26.0 32.2 37.7 39.1 36.4 35.4 34.6 30.7 24.4 19.6 29.6
% Rated
Load 113 110 105 100 94 93 96 97 97 101 107 111 102
qext 32.8 36.7 40.6 42.8 45.0 43.3 41.1 40.0 38.9 39.4 34.4 32.8 45.0
qmax 28.8 30.6 32.7 34.9 37.6 37.3 35.2 34.5 33.9 31.8 29.2 28.2 32.9
qmin 20.3 21.1 23.1 26.0 27.8 27.6 26.3 25.8 25.4 24.4 22.5 21.0 24.3
32. Madras qmean 24.6 25.8 27.9 30.4 32.7 32.3 30.8 30.2 29.6 28.1 25.8 24.6 28.6
qa 29.6 30.8 32.9 35.4 37.7 37.3 35.8 35.2 34.6 33.1 30.8 29.6 33.6
% Rated
Load 102 101 99 97 94 95 96 97 97 99 101 102 98
qext 34.4 38.3 41.7 41.7 41.7 42.2 40.6 40.0 39.4 38.3 36.1 35.0 42.2
qmax 30.2 32.4 35.0 36.3 37.5 36.7 35.7 35.3 35.0 33.0 30.6 29.7 33.9
Loading and Life of Transformers
33. Madurai qmin 20.9 21.6 23.4 25.4 26.3 26.3 25.7 25.2 24.8 24.0 23.0 21.6 24.0
qmean 25.6 27.0 29.2 30.8 31.9 31.5 30.7 30.2 29.9 28.5 26.8 25.6 29.0
qa 30.6 32.0 34.2 35.8 36.9 36.5 35.7 35.2 34.9 33.5 31.8 30.6 34.0
% Rated
Load 101 100 98 96 95 96 96 97 97 98 100 101 98
433
Sheet No. 14
434
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 34.4 37.2 35.0 33.9 33.3 33.3 31.7 30.6 31.7 36.1 35.6 33.9 37.2
qmax 29.7 29.0 30.0 30.9 31.3 29.4 28.0 27.8 28.1 29.8 31.0 30.5 29.5
34. Marmugao qmin 21.4 21.9 23.9 26.1 29.9 24.7 24.0 23.9 23.8 23.9 22.8 21.5 23.7
qmean 25.6 25.4 27.0 28.5 29.1 27.0 26.0 25.8 26.0 26.8 26.9 26.0 26.6
qa 30.6 30.4 32.0 33.5 34.1 32.0 31.0 30.8 31.0 31.8 31.9 31.0 31.6
% Rated
Load 101 102 100 98 98 100 101 101 101 100 100 101 100
qext 32.8 36.1 37.8 39.4 37.8 37.2 33.3 33.9 33.3 32.8 32.2 31.7 39.4
qmax 28.3 31.2 33.5 34.0 32.6 28.9 27.3 27.9 28.7 28.4 27.4 27.0 29.6
35. Mysore qmin 16.4 18.2 20.2 21.4 21.2 20.2 19.7 19.6 19.3 19.6 18.3 16.5 19.2
qmean 22.4 24.7 26.8 27.7 26.9 24.6 23.5 23.8 24.0 24.0 22.8 21.8 24.4
qa 27.4 29.7 31.8 32.7 31.9 29.6 28.5 28.8 29.0 29.0 27.8 26.8 29.4
% Rated
Load 104 102 100 99 100 102 103 102 102 102 103 104 102
Transformers, 2/e
qext 35.0 38.9 45.0 46.1 47.8 47.2 40.6 37.8 38.9 38.3 35.6 33.9 47.8
qmax 28.6 32.5 36.4 39.7 42.8 38.4 31.2 30.4 31.5 31.9 29.9 28.7 33.5
36. Nagpur qmin 12.7 15.1 19.1 23.9 28.4 26.9 24.0 23.7 23.1 20.0 14.1 12.1 20.3
qmean 20.6 23.8 27.8 31.8 35.6 32.6 27.6 27.0 27.3 26.0 22.0 20.4 26.9
qa 25.6 28.8 32.8 36.8 40.6 37.6 32.6 32.0 32.3 33.0 27.0 25.4 31.9
% Rated
Load 105 102 99 95 91 94 99 100 100 99 104 106 100
Sheet No. 15
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 29.4 33.3 40.6 45.6 47.2 46.7 45.0 40.0 40.6 39.4 35.0 28.9 47.2
qmax 21.3 23.6 30.2 36.2 40.5 39.9 35.3 33.7 34.1 33.1 28.7 23.4 31.7
37. New Delhi qmin 7.3 10.1 15.1 21.0 26.6 28.7 27.2 26.1 24.6 18.7 11.8 8.0 18.8
qmean 14.3 16.8 22.6 28.6 33.5 34.3 31.2 29.9 29.4 25.9 20.2 15.7 25.2
qa 19.3 21.8 27.6 33.6 38.5 39.3 36.2 34.9 34.4 30.9 25.2 20.7 30.2
% Rated
Load 112 109 103 98 94 93 96 97 98 101 106 110 102
qext 28.9 34.4 40.6 43.3 45.6 46.1 41.7 38.3 37.8 36.1 33.9 30.6 46.1
qmax 23.6 26.3 32.9 37.6 38.9 36.7 32.9 32.1 32.3 31.9 28.9 24.9 31.6
38. Patna qmin 11.0 13.4 18.6 23.3 26.0 27.1 26.7 26.6 26.3 23.0 16.1 11.7 20.8
qmean 17.3 19.8 25.8 30.4 32.4 31.9 29.8 29.4 29.3 27.4 22.5 18.3 26.2
qa 22.3 24.8 30.8 35.4 37.4 36.9 34.8 34.4 34.3 32.4 27.5 23.3 31.2
% Rated
Load 109 106 101 97 95 95 97 98 98 100 103 108 101
qext 35.0 38.9 42.8 43.3 43.3 41.7 35.6 33.0 36.1 37.8 36.1 35.0 43.3
qmax 30.7 32.9 36.1 37.9 37.2 31.9 27.8 27.7 29.2 31.8 30.8 30.1 32.0
Loading and Life of Transformers
39. Poona qmin 12.0 13.3 16.8 20.6 22.6 23.0 22.0 21.5 20.8 19.3 15.0 12.0 18.2
qmean 21.4 23.1 26.4 29.2 29.9 27.4 24.9 24.6 25.0 25.6 22.9 21.0 25.1
qa 26.4 28.1 31.4 34.2 34.9 32.4 29.9 29.6 30.0 30.6 27.9 26.0 30.1
% Rated
Load 105 103 101 98 97 100 102 102 102 101 103 105 102
435
Sheet No. 16
436
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 32.8 33.0 40.0 41.1 42.2 39.4 36.7 36.7 36.1 36.1 33.9 32.8 42.2
40. Puri q max 26.9 28.3 30.0 30.7 31.6 31.7 30.6 31.0 31.4 31.2 29.3 27.2 30.0
qmin 17.9 20.8 24.6 26.6 27.7 27.4 26.7 26.8 26.6 25.0 20.8 17.7 24.1
qmean 22.4 24.6 27.3 28.6 29.6 29.6 28.6 28.9 29.0 28.1 25.0 22.4 27.0
qa 27.4 29.6 32.3 33.6 34.6 34.6 33.6 33.6 34.0 33.1 30.0 27.4 32.0
% Rated
Load 104 102 100 98 97 97 98 98 98 99 102 104 100
qext 33.9 38.9 42.8 44.6 47.2 47.2 40.0 37.4 37.3 36.4 35.2 34.1 47.2
q max 31.1 34.1 37.7 40.3 42.8 38.6 32.1 31.3 32.0 32.5 30.7 30.2 34.5
41. Ramgundam qmin 16.1 18.8 22.7 26.9 29.7 28.2 24.7 24.4 24.4 22.8 17.5 15.0 22.6
qmean 23.6 26.4 30.2 33.6 36.2 33.4 28.4 27.8 28.2 27.6 24.1 22.6 28.6
qa 28.6 31.4 35.2 38.6 41.2 38.4 33.4 32.8 33.2 32.6 29.1 27.6 33.6
% Rated
Load 102 101 97 93 91 94 99 99 99 99 102 103 98
Transformers, 2/e
qext 21.1 24.4 28.9 30.0 30.7 28.3 28.3 29.4 27.8 27.2 25.6 22.8 30.7
q max 15.5 17.1 21.5 23.8 23.7 23.7 24.1 24.1 23.6 21.8 18.9 16.4 21.2
42. Shillong qmin 3.6 6.4 10.5 14.1 15.5 17.4 18.1 17.8 16.6 12.9 7.7 4.5 12.1
qmean 9.6 11.8 16.0 19.0 19.6 20.6 21.1 21.0 20.1 17.4 13.3 10.4 16.6
qa 14.6 16.8 21.0 24.0 24.6 25.6 26.1 26.0 25.1 22.4 18.3 15.4 21.6
% Rated
Load 116 114 110 107 106 105 105 105 106 109 113 116 109
Sheet No. 17
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 18.9 20.6 23.9 28.3 30.0 30.6 28.9 27.8 25.0 23.9 21.1 20.4 30.6
43. Shimla qmax 8.5 10.3 14.4 19.2 23.4 24.3 21.0 20.1 20.0 17.9 15.0 11.3 17.1
qmin 1.9 3.1 6.8 11.2 15.0 16.2 15.6 15.2 13.8 10.8 7.3 4.2 10.1
qmean 5.2 6.7 10.6 15.2 19.2 20.2 18.3 17.6 16.9 14.3 11.2 7.8 13.6
qa 10.2 11.7 15.6 20.2 24.2 25.2 23.3 22.6 21.9 19.3 16.2 12.8 18.6
% Rated
Load 120 118 115 111 107 106 108 108 109 112 115 117 112
qext 17.2 20.6 25.6 31.1 35.6 37.8 38.3 36.4 33.0 33.9 23.9 18.3 38.3
qmax 4.4 7.9 13.4 19.3 24.6 29.0 30.8 29.9 28.3 22.6 15.5 8.8 19.5
44. Srinagar qmin –2.3 –0.8 3.5 7.4 11.2 14.4 18.4 17.9 12.7 5.7 –0.1 –1.8 7.2
qmean 1.0 3.6 8.4 13.4 17.9 21.7 24.6 23.9 20.5 14.2 7.7 3.5 13.4
qa 6.0 8.6 13.4 18.4 22.9 26.7 29.6 28.9 25.5 19.2 12.7 8.5 18.4
% Rated
Load 124 122 177 133 108 104 102 102 105 112 117 122 113
qext 38.3 41.7 43.9 45.6 45.6 45.6 38.9 37.2 41.1 41.1 39.4 38.9 45.6
qmax 31.4 33.1 36.1 37.3 36.2 33.7 30.5 30.3 31.6 35.5 34.9 32.8 33.6
45. Surat 14.8 16.4 20.1 23.7 26.6 27.1 25.7 25.4 24.1 23.1 19.2 16.0 21.9
Loading and Life of Transformers
qmin
qmean 23.1 24.8 28.1 30.5 31.4 30.4 28.1 27.8 27.8 29.3 27.0 24.4 27.8
qa 28.1 29.8 33.1 35.5 36.4 35.4 33.1 32.8 32.8 34.3 32.0 29.4 32.8
% Rated
Load 103 102 99 96 96 97 99 99 99 98 100 102 99
437
Sheet No. 18
438
S. No. Location Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
qext 35.6 40.0 42.2 42.8 43.3 43.9 41.1 40.6 40.6 36.9 36.7 35.6 43.9
q max 30.1 32.7 35.1 36.7 37.1 36.4 35.5 35.1 34.2 32.3 29.9 29.3 33.7
46. Tiruchy qmin 20.6 21.3 22.9 25.8 26.4 26.5 25.9 25.4 24.9 23.9 22.7 21.3 24.0
qmean 25.4 27.0 29.0 31.2 31.8 31.4 30.7 30.2 29.6 28.1 26.3 25.3 28.8
qa 30.4 32.0 34.0 36.2 36.8 36.4 35.7 35.2 34.6 33.1 31.3 30.3 33.8
% Rated
Load 102 100 98 96 95 95 95 97 97 99 101 102 98
qext 34.4 35.0 36.2 35.0 35.2 34.4 31.7 32.8 33.8 32.8 33.9 34.4 36.2
q max 31.3 31.7 32.5 32.4 31.6 29.4 29.1 29.4 29.9 29.9 30.1 30.9 30.7
qmin 22.3 22.9 24.2 25.1 25.0 23.6 23.2 23.3 23.3 23.4 23.1 22.5 23.5
47. Trivandrum qmean 26.8 27.3 28.4 28.8 28.3 26.5 26.2 26.4 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.7 27.2
qa 31.8 32.3 33.4 33.8 33.3 31.5 31.2 31.4 31.6 31.6 31.6 31.7 32.2
% Rated
Load 100 100 99 98 99 100 101 101 100 100 100 100 100
Transformers, 2/e
qext 33.1 36.7 38.3 40.5 43.3 44.4 38.3 38.2 37.8 36.8 33.9 32.8 44.4
q max 27.7 29.2 31.2 32.8 34.0 33.7 31.7 32.0 31.6 30.9 29.3 27.7 31.0
48. Vizag qmin 17.5 19.3 22.6 25.9 27.8 27.4 26.0 26.0 25.6 24.5 21.2 18.3 23.5
qmean 22.6 24.2 26.9 29.4 30.9 30.6 28.8 29.0 28.6 27.7 25.2 23.0 27.2
qa 27.6 29.2 31.9 34.4 35.9 35.6 33.8 34.0 33.6 32.7 30.2 28.0 32.2
% Rated
Load 103 102 100 98 96 96 98 98 98 99 102 103 100
C HAPTER 17
17.1 Despatch
17.3 Handling
17.4 Installation
The special feature of this bushing is the re-entrant control at the oil
end which is brought about by special arrangement of condenser
layers. Starting from the earth foil, the limiting area of foil ends in
conformity with regular constructional principle form a core oriented
away from the flange. At about two-third of the voltage between
flange and tube, the foil ends are reversed and follow a course of
Erection and Commissioning 443
core reverting towards the flange and goes as far as the conductor
tube. The re-entrant control has the following advantages:
— The lower end is shorter than the conventional ends.
— Orifice of the lower end has a larger diameter and makes
possible introduction of thick insulated cable.
— Stress shield is avoided.
It is important to ensure the concentricity and axial position of the
insulated lead of transformer winding inside the re-entrant oil end
of the bushing. Following precautions must be followed (Refer to
Fig. 17.2):
— Ensure that the position of the transformer winding lead is
correct axially and radially.
Bushing
re-entrant
end
Metal hold
Before filling with oil, transformer should be fitted with all accesso-
ries, such as valves, plugs, and made oil tight.
The oil which is to be filled in transformer must be tested for
dielectric strength and water content and should be in line with the
recommendations. If not, it must be filtered with stream line filters
with built-in heaters and vacuum pumps for improving the quality
of oil. During oil filling operation, it should be ensured that no air
pockets are left in the tank and no dust or moisture enters the oil
and it should be warmer than surrounding air.
For transformers despatched gas filled, the filling of oil inside the
tank should always be done under vacuum. While evacuating the
transformer tank, care should be taken to ensure that bakelite cylin-
ders, panels, etc., are not subjected to pressure. The vacuum should
be maintained for a short time after the tank is filled with oil.
The vacuum pulling in the tank will avoid chances of air getting
trapped and forming pockets. Oil filling will protect the windings
against exposure to atmosphere at the time of erection of bushings,
etc.
Following precautions should be taken during this operation:
— Oil is easily contaminated. It is very important, when
sampling the oil and filling the tank, to keep the oil free from
contamination.
— All equipment used for handling the oil should be cleaned and
flushed with clean transformer oil before use (the oil used for
washing must be discarded). Particular attention should be
paid to the cleanliness of bungs, valves and other parts where
dirt or moisture tends to collect.
— For sampling, glass containers with glass stoppers are to be
preferred over the metal type which are susceptible to
446 Transformers, 2/e
17.5 Commissioning
17.5.1 Transformer
Measurements
Measurement of ratio, resistance, vector group and magnetizing cur-
rent should be of the order of works’ test results. BDV and water
content of oil in transformer tank, tapchanger and cooler bank (the
Air gases and moisture being removed
from transformer
448
Facility for
paralleling
vacuum
Edge filter
systems
Oil
tank
Moisture and
dissolved
Transformers, 2/e
gases being
evolved and
Path of oil Heater taken off by
flow tank vacuum system
Roots rotary
Transformer Discharge pump combination for
Gear pump taking oil Roots rotary
undergoing evacuating
from tank or transformer combination for
treatment transformer
high vacuum in
degassing
chamber
Figure 17.3 General diagram for treatment of oil and conditioning of transformer.
Erection and Commissioning 449
Observations
Bushing CT polarity, silicagel breather, earthing, bushing arching
horn, valves, etc. must be checked for their correctness.
17.5.2 Protection
17.5.3 Tapchanger
17.6 Maintenance
17.9.1 Dos
9. Check the IR value and tan d value (if possible) with bushing
in position on transformer with jumper connection removed.
Record these readings for reference and guidance for future
measurements.
10. Check BDV of oil and IR value of each bushing periodically
during maintenance shut down. These values should be
comparable with the values recorded at the time of commis-
sioning.
11. Ensure to allow the air to escape from central tube to the
atmosphere while filling the transformer tank.
12. Maintain the log book records of periodical checks (i.e. tan d
and BDV of oil) up to date.
17.9.2 Don’ts
Transformer Protection
B.L. Rawat
18.1.1 Short-Circuit
Short-circuit across any two or all the three lines may occur in the
system. The over currents produced because of such faults depend
upon system MVA feeding the fault, the voltage which has been
short-circuited and upon the impedance of the circuit up to the fault.
System short-circuits produce a relatively intense rate of heating of
the feeding transformer, as the copper-loss increases in proportion
to the square of per-unit fault current. The duration of external
short-circuit that a transformer shall sustain without damage, if the
current is limited only by self-impedance, is 2 s as per IS : 2026.
Large fault currents produce severe mechanical stresses in the
transformer; the maximum stress occurs during the first cycle of
asymmetrical fault current and so cannot be averted by automatic
tripping of the circuit. The control of such stress is therefore a
Transformer Protection 457
Tank
Core
LV HV
Surge
diverter
From Fig. 18.2, it may be noted that the fault in the lower third
of the winding produces very little current through the primary
terminals.
If If
single phase earth fault current
Percentage of respective max.
100
Fault
current
If
Primary current
100
0
Distance of fault from neutral
(percentage of WDG)
15
the position of fault on the
Fault current
winding. It is seen that the 10
reactance decreases very
rapidly for the fault point 5
approaching the neutral and
Primary current
hence the fault current is
0 20 40 60 80 100
highest for a fault near the
Distance of fault from neutral
neutral end of the winding. (percentage of winding)
The variation of current with
fault position is shown in Figure 18.3 Earth fault current in case
Fig. 18.3. of solidly earthed neutral.
Transformer Protection 461
From Fig. 18.3 it can be noticed that the fault current magnitude
stays very high throughout the winding. Also, after transformation
ratio the input current curve remains at a substantial level for faults
at most points along the winding.
(c) Restricted earth fault protection. A simple over-current and earth
fault system will not give good protection cover for a star-connected
primary winding, particularly if the neutral is earthed through an
impedance. The restricted earth fault protection schematic shown in
Fig. 18.4 improve the degree of protection very much. This scheme
is operative for faults on the star winding of the transformer. The
system will remain stable for all faults outside the zone. As whole
fault current is measured, a good degree of protection of the winding
is achieved even in the case of neutral being earthed through imped-
ance. In the case of solidly earthed neutral, fault current remains at
a very high value even to the last turn of the winding and hence
complete cover for earth fault is obtained with restricted earth fault
protection scheme.
U
V
W
Impedance
R
High impedance relay
rated system voltage will concentrate on the end turns of the wind-
ing, because of the high equivalent frequency of the surge front. Also
LV winding is stressed because of the transferred surge voltage. It is
reported that a very high percentage of all transformer failures arise
from faults between turns. Inter-turn fault may also occur because of
mechanical forces on the winding due to external short-circuit.
Though there may be high short-circuit current between few turns
loop, the terminal current will be very small because of the high
ratio of transformation between the whole winding and the short-
circuited turns. If this turn-to-turn fault is not detected in the
earliest stage, the subsequent progress may destroy the evidence of
the true cause.
Operating WDG
of relay
Connecting
auxiliary
current
transformer Restricted earth fault
relay bias winding
which can permit sufficient eddy current to flow, it will cause serious
over-heating. The insulated core bolts are used for tightening the
core. If the insulation of these bolts fails and provided easy path for
eddy current, this will lead to over-heating. This additional core-loss,
although it causes severe local heating, will not produce a noticeable
change in the input current and cannot be detected by the normal
electrical protection. However, it is desirable to detect over-heating
condition before a major fault has been created. Excessive heating of
core will breakdown transformer oil with evolution of gas. This gas
rises to the conservator.
(a) All faults in transformer core and windings result in the
localized heating and breakdown of oil. When the fault is of
very minor type such as hot joint, gas is released slowly and
rises towards conservator. A major fault where severe arcing
takes place, causes rapid release of large volume of gas and
oil vapour. This violent evolution of gas and oil vapour does
not have time to escape and instead builds up pressure and
bodily displaces the oil, causing surge of oil to pass up the
relief pipe to the conservator. Recognition of the above action
by Buchholz, and the limitation of other means of detecting
certain types of fault, led to the development of a protective
device known by his name. Construction of Buchholz relay
has been described in Chapter 11. Two electrical contacts are
available in the Buchholz relay, one for alarm and the other
for trip. When the generation of gas is slow, the gas while
moving towards the conservator gets trapped in the relay and
Transformer Protection 465
REFERENCES
1. Austen Stigant, S. and A.C. Franklin, The J and P Transformer Book,
Newness-Butterworth London.
2. Protective Relay Application and Guide, General Electric Co. (U.K.).
C HAPTER 19
Reactors
C.M. Shrivastava
S.K. Mahajan
19.1.1 Types
Generator Generator
Reactor
Generator
Reactor
Generator
Reactor
G G G G
New load
added
Reactor
M 3f
supply
Arrangement No. 1
Reactor
3f
M
supply
Arrangement No. 2
Supply Supply
Reactor
Reactor
Reactor
Converter
transformer
Filter
Line trap
400 km approx
Xi = U2
F 1 - 1I
HY Z K
Reactors 471
A ¥ 1000
I=
3U
Y ¥ 1000
IS =
3U
Q = I ¥ X1 ¥ 10–3
2
Class of Temperature°C
Type Insulation Copper Aluminium
Oil A 250 200
Dry A 180 180
Dry E 250 200
Dry B 350 200
Dry F and H 350 —
1
2
5
4
1. Conductor
2. Conductor insulation
3. Insulator
4. Concrete supports and base
5. Provision for lifting
6. Terminal
19.2.1 Types
The shunt reactor can be classified as follows:
(b) Losses
The total losses in a shunt reactor from economical reasons should
be as low as possible. Low loss design with natural cooling generally
476 Transformers, 2/e
19.2.3 Construction
(a) Core-less
In a core-less reactor there is no magnetic material inside the coil
and the dimensions of the winding are identical to those of the air
gap volume, which imposes restrictions on the geometrical propor-
tions. The winding must be made wide and flat, so that the magnetic
flux path length is limited. The flux density in practice is much lower
than in the gapped core design and the total volume is larger for a
given reactive power rating. Flux with full intensity penetrates
the inner turns of the winding and gives rise to relatively high eddy
current losses. The flux density then sinks gradually towards the
Reactors 477
4
5
3
6
Core lamination
Tube
Cooling channels
B� 2
W= (Gap volume)
2m 0
LI� 2
W= = L I2
2
Where I = rms value of current
Rated reactive power
B� 2
Q = wLI2 = wW = w . [gap volume]
2m 0
The gapped core design is based on high flux density in a relatively
small gap volume.
Also, Field energy per unit volume
B2
P = = Magnetic pulling force
2m 0
482 Transformers, 2/e
Traction Transformers
J.M. Malik
The following types of traction transformers are in use with the elec-
tric locomotives of the Railways of the various countries.
A1 A2
HV
LV LV Aux. 1 Aux. 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
V1 4 NR VR f II f III
fI 5
1 2 3
1, 2,3. Limbs
4. Regulating auto-transformer with steps
5. Primary winding of the main transformer
6. Secondary winding 1 of the main transformer
7. Secondary winding 2 of the main transformer
8. Auxiliary winding
OS
Z5
US3
X6 X10 US4
Z3 Z4
X7 X9
X8
US3 US4 OS1 US2 US1 OS2 Z2
Z1
US1 US2
OS1-Inner HV winding
OS2-Outer HV winding
US1-4-Four secondaries
Z1-Z5, X6-X10-Impedances of equivalent circuit diagram
The basic circuit diagram of Fig. 20.2 shows the individual windings
and their arrangement on the three cores. The main transformer
(limb 2 and 3) is fed with variable voltage by the regulating auto-
transformer (limb 1).
490 Transformers, 2/e
\ f II =
fI F NR + 1I
2 H NP K
\ fIII =
fI F NR - 1I
2 H NP K
where
VI = incoming supply voltage
VR = regulating output voltage
N1 = series + common winding turns
NR = regulating winding turns
NP = primary winding turns
So the number of turns on one hand and the core cross-section
on the other are selected so that the flux in all three cores is approxi-
mately equal on traction operation steps, which correspond to
primary voltage of 22.5 to 27.5 kV.
Traction Transformers 491
(b) Insulation
Bulk of the insulation is precompressed pressboard, which does not
chip or get crushed under shock loads. The entire coil assembly is
carefully shrunk under predetermined clamping pressure and con-
trolled heat. As a further safeguard against any minor shrinkages
in service, spring loaded pressure pads are employed which exert a
steady pressure on all the windings through a sturdy steel plate, as
shown in Fig. 20.5. As the space is at premium, the precompressed
492 Transformers, 2/e
(d) Fittings
To bring in the desired compactness, the coolers are always of the
forced-oil forced-air type. The rate of oil flow and position of inlet and
outlet of oil from the transformer are governed by considerations of
optimum cooling. The oil pump is of a glandless-type construction
and is placed near the oil outlet. The oil passes through a cooler
consisting of finned tubes, over which the air is forced by a blower.
The oil from the cooler enters the transformer at the bottom and
then rises to the top near the outlet. To facilitate servicing and
replacement of the major components in the cooling circuit, valves
are introduced at the appropriate places. Figure 20.7 (Plate 8)
presents a view of the transformer with complete fittings. In Fig. 20.7,
to the right is the tapchanger with the conservator at the top and in
the centre is the blower motor for forced air cooling.
The traction transformer has an in-built system of protection
for maximum safety in service. This is achieved by a number of
Traction Transformers 493
protective devices such as, oil and air flow indicators in the cooling
circuits. The separately mounted CT in the primary circuit ensures
protection against excessive overloads and short-circuits. The
primary side is protected from the voltage surges by means of arcing
horns placed on the roof of the locomotive. The auxiliary windings
and associated equipment which are subjected to sudden rises in
voltages are protected by surge condensers connected across the
winding. The breather which prevents the ingress of moisture is also
of a special construction. The breather has a special shaped nozzle at
the entrance to filter out the heavy particles.
The transformer is provided with a condenser bushing for connec-
tion to 25 kV end. All other HV, LV, auxiliary bushings are porcelain
type and are mounted on top of the tank cover as shown in Fig. 20.7.
20.4.1 Introduction
The thyristorized controlled locomotive has the following advan-
tages, due to elimination of tapchanger as well as of the silicon
diodes.
— Smooth acceleration and retardation by stepless control.
— Full regenerative braking capability.
— Better adhesion and high speed detection and correction of
wheel slip and wheel skid.
— Facility of automatic current and speed control.
— Absence of wearing parts and consequent saving in main-
tenance costs.
Core
A1
HV
A2
a4
LV4 a3
a2
LV1 a1
LVs
LV2 a8
a7
a6
LV3
a5
a10
Auxiliary
a9
a12
Excitation
a11
REFERENCES
1. Ecknaver, E. Traction Transformers for the Indian Railways,
Bulletin Oerlikon, No. 361.
2. Gupta, D.P., R.K. Shukla and J.M. Malik, Salient Features of
Traction Transformer, Electrical India, June 19/3.
3. Bohli. W.U., H.M. Deng and W. Muller, Transformers and Smoothing
Reactors for AC Traction Vehicles, Brown Boveri Review, Publication
No. CH–B 0540 E.
C HAPTER 21
Rectifier Transformers
J.S. Sastry
Em m p
= ◊ ◊ sin
R p m
where, Em is peak phase to neutral voltage of the trans-
former. This is because each diode conducts for an interval of
360/m degree or 2p/m radians per cycle. Similarly, the rms
current per diode is
1 +p /m E2 cos2 w t
Irms =
2p z-p/m
m
R2
dw t
=
Em 1 pLM p
+ sin ◊ cos
p OP
R 2p m N m m Q
and the rms value of the current in the load having m pulses*
per second is m times Irms. The ripple value, defined by the
expression
2
Ripple =
LM I OP
rms
-1
NI Q d
The ripple decreases rapidly with increase in the number of
pulses or phases and hence the distortion of primary current
m 2 3 6 12
Ripple frequency
for 50 Hz 100 150 300 600
Ripple 0.47 0.17 0.04 0.014
Secondary-2
IPT
Secondary-1 L
o
a
d
Id
L
o
a
Secondary d
Secondaries
Primaries
the other in delta, provided that the rectifier circuits are bridge
connected as shown in Fig. 21.4. The two six-pulse systems can
either be connected in series or in parallel.
Primaries
I
P
T
1
I
P
T
2
505
(a) HV Winding
This HV windings of this transformer are usually disc type and are
connected in either star or delta or zig-zag, which is described below.
It was mentioned that the phase shift between the input and
output voltage vectors can be achieved by zig-zag connection. This
can be explained with the help of Fig. 21.6(a) and (b).
Rectifier Transformers 507
A B C
120° Short
coils
Vi
q Vo
Long
(a) coils
(b)
(b) LV Winding
The secondary voltage of the rectifier transformer is very low and of
the order of a few hundred volts. Obviously, the turns in the second-
ary winding can be as few as two or three. On the other hand, cur-
rent carried by these windings is very high. For this reason a special
winding called half and sections (H and S) is used. This resembles the
508 Transformers, 2/e
disc winding to the extent that each coil is wound in two discs
accommodating the total number of turns. A number of coils of this
type are connected in parallel by bus-bars for sharing the total
current. The advantage of this coil is that odd number of turns can be
accommodated in two discs of the coil without any loss of space,
which cannot be done with the normal disc-winding technique. But
the condition for this is that there should be even number of parallel
conductors.
As an example, a coil with three turns and two conductors in
parallel is shown schematically in Figs. 21.7 and 21.8.
4
Y X
X Y
5 3
6 2
7 1
8
Disc. 1 Disc. 2
(a) (b)
1 2 3 4 XY 5 6 7 8 9
X
Y
X X
Y
X
Y
X
Y Y
X
Y
X Y
(e) Bus-bars
In addition to carrying LV currents, bus-bars are also used for
neutral formation, neutrals to interphase transformer connection
and for connecting the LV bus-bars to the transductors. The design
of the bus-bars and the arrangement has to be keeping the following
important considerations in view.
(i) Skin effect. A reasonably accurate determination of the current
rating of the conductors carrying direct current is possible from the
theoretical considerations, but with heavy alternating currents the
510 Transformers, 2/e
Secondary-1 Secondary-2
Line Neutral Line Neutral
Dise. No.
1
Secondary-1
2
1
2
Secondary-2
1
2
1
2
Secondary-1
1
2
1
2
Secondary-2
1
2
Secondary-1 1
2
current density is not uniform due to the skin effect and the apparent
ac resistance is always greater than that measured by dc methods. In
the case of flat bus bars, skin effect results in a concentration of
current at the edges of the bus-bars. With the larger sizes of the
conductors for a given cross-sectional area, skin effect in a thin flat
bar or strip is usually less than in a circular rod but greater than in a
tube. It is dependent, among other things on the ratio of the width to
the thickness of the bar and increases as the thickness of the bar
increases. The curves in Fig. 21.10 give approximate skin effect
ratios for flat bars of various cross-sectional areas and proportions.
The skin effect ratio is the ratio of the apparent ac resistance of a
conductor (R¢) to its dc resistance (R).
(ii) Proximity effect. In the foregoing consideration of the skin effect,
it has been assumed that the conductor is isolated and at such a
distance from the return conductor that the effect of the current in it
can be neglected. When conductors are close together, as is often the
Rectifier Transformers 511
8 a/b
1.4
16
8
b 16
cy ycle
cle
50 0 c
1.3 a
6
24
R¢
R
1.2 8
16
24
cle
cy
25
1.1
1.0
1 2 3
“Go” and “Return” path, i.e. up to the point where the line and
neutral bus-bars (risers) run together. The second part is for single-
phase path, i.e. from the point where neutral is made to the point of
connection to the line terminals. In calculating this reactance, it is
assumed that in the case of laminated bus-bars connected in parallel,
provided the spacing between the individual bars is small, the
reactance may be taken to be the same as that of a single conductor
having the same overall dimensions as the group.
1. Go and return path. Referring to Fig. 21.11, let the values
of a, b and d be as shown. The ratios (b/a) and (d/a) are calcu-
lated and the corresponding Dm, geometric mean distance
between two paths is read off from the curve given in
Fig. 21.12. Then Ds, the geometric mean distance* of each
path from itself is calculated from Ds = 0.2235 ¥ (a + b).
Then associated inductance La is calculated by equation
La = 0.002 ¥ l ¥ log (DmDs) mH
where l is the length of “Go” and “Return” path. Hence, the
associated inductance La included both self and mutual
effects, i.e. La = L – M. From this inductance, reactance can
easily be calculated.
b
1.0 0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5 0.3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.6
0.1
0.09 0.7
0.08
0.07
0.06 0.8
Dm –1 0.05
d 0.04
0.03 0.9
0.02
0.01
0.009
0.008
0.007 1
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
b
0.001 a =1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 d 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.9 1.0 a
–
+
Design Features
An interphase transformer can be either a wound type or a bar-
mounted type depending on the voltage to be absorbed and the direct
current rating.
(a) Wound type interphase transformer. The wound type interphase
transformer is like a single-phase transformer with windings on the
two legs of the core.
The total number of turns in each windings is divided equally and
accommodated on the two limbs. The connection diagram is as
shown in Fig. 21.14. The terminals N1 and N2 are connected to the
respective neutrals of the two secondaries of the rectifier trans-
former and N forms the negative terminal of the dc supply. Since the
windings carry large currents and the number of turns if few, H and
S coils are used.
(b) Bar-mounted type of interphase transformer. In this type of
interphase transformer, the bus-bars from the neutrals pass through
rectangular cores forming a single turn winding. The arrangement
is shown in Fig. 21.15. As before N1 and N2 are connected to the two
neutrals and N to the dc negative terminal.
516 Transformers, 2/e
N1 I N N2
I/2 I/2
I/2 I/2
N
I/2 I/2 I I/2 I/2
N1 N2
21.4 Transductors
AC
supply
DC supply
Load
End board
1
Ring core
2
7
End board
Bias rod
Control rod
LV bars
TIE rods
Rectifier cubicle
Transformer secondary
terminals
Transformer
Rectifier cubicle
21.5.2 Layout
It has been stated earlier that all the associated equipment of
the rectifier transformer, like regulating transformers, interphase
transformers and transductors are placed in the tank for obvious
advantages like smaller space requirement and higher operational
reliability. In addition to this the other advantages are:
(a) By placing the regulating transformer in the same tank not
only considerable space is saved, but it also reduces the risk
of the short-circuit on outgoing terminals of the regulating
transformer. It obviates the need for expensive short-circuit
protection gear owing to their low impedance voltage,
specially when the ratio is small (auto-transformers are not
short-circuit-proof on their own).
(b) Materials like steel, cables, oil, copper bus-bars, etc., can be
saved by this arrangement. This is particularly the case
with the interphase transformer and transductor, since they
accommodate heavy copper bus-bars. This also results in
lower bus-bar reactance, losses, etc. A typical layout of all the
equipment mentioned is shown in Fig. 21.20, which shows the
internal arrangement of rectifier transformer tank for 12-
pulse, with the regulating transformer placed perpendicular
to the main transformers. The interphase transformers are
placed over the top of the main transformers and the
transductors in a separate pocket in front on the main
transformers.
Transductor
transformer
Regulating
Main transformer
Transductor-1
Main transformer-1
Interphase transformer-1
transformer
Regulating
Interphase transformer-2
Main transformer-2
Transductor-2
21.7 Testing
REFERENCES
1. Copper for Bus-bars, Copper development association, U.K.
2. Reyner, J.H., Magnetic Amplifiers, Rockliff, 2nd ed., 1956.
3. Ryder, J.D., Engineering Electronics with industrial application and
control, McGraw-Hill, Kogakusha Co., New York, 1957.
4. Schaefer, Johannes, Rectifier Circuits—Theory and Design. Wiley &
Sons, New York, 1965.
5. Brown Bovery Review—March/April 1961.
C HAPTER 22
Convertor Transformers
for HVDC Systems
I.C. Tayal
C.M. Sharma
S.C. Bhageria
DC pole
AC busbar
DC valve
To ground electrode
0%
100%
100 %
22.3 DC Magnetization
22.4 DC Bushings
22.7 Connections
In this case 2 designs and 3 units of each design are needed for 12
pulse rectification. One spare unit of each design is recommended.
One 3-phase unit for 12 pulse convertor is required. One spare unit is
recommended.
22.8 Specifications
22.10 Tests
and grounded together with the tank. The polarity is negative and
the wave shape is kept in accordance with the prevailing standards.
REFERENCES
1. Wahlstrom, Bo., (WG 12.02), Voltage Tests on Transformers and
Smoothing Reactors for HVDC Transmission, Electra No. 46, May
1976.
2. Watanabe, M., T. Obata, E. Takahashi, Development of Convertor
Transformers and Smoothing Reactors, Hitachi Review, Vol. 34,
1985, No. 5.
3. Mannhein, H., Bold, Static Convertor Transformer for the HVDC
Transmission Link Cabora Bassa, Apollo, Brown Boveri Rev. 7, 76.
4. Beletsky, Z.M., I.D. Voevodin, A.K. Lokhanin, Transformer
Equipment for DC Transmission Lines, World Electrotechnical
Congress, June 1977.
5. A. Lindroth et al. “The relationship between Test and Service
Stresses as a function of Resistivity Ratio for HVDC Converter
Transformers and Smoothing /Reactors” CIGRE Working Group
report WG 12/14.10, Electra No. 157, December, 1994.
6. Part 2 : Transformers for HVDC applications, IEC 61378-2, first
edition, 2001–02.
C HAPTER 23
transmission voltages like 400 kV, the thyristor valves are connected
to the controlled shunt reactor transformer (CSRT) secondary side.
A CSRT with primary winding connected to high voltage transmis-
sion lines, and secondary winding (control winding) connected to
thyristor valves, forms the basis of CSR. Basically, a CSR consists of
a high impedance transformer (CSRT) controlled by an antiparallel
pair of thyristor valves. The impedance of a CSRT can be controlled
by varying the firing angle of the thyristor pair through a controller.
The controller is a logical and programmable device, which generates
firing pulses based on the input signals. Figure 23.1 explains the
underlying principle of the CSR. When the thyristor valve is not con-
ducting the control winding is almost open. In this case, only a very
small current (very low MVA) flows through the primary winding
because the reactive impedance of a CSR is very high. On the other
hand, when the thyristor is fully conductive (i.e. control winding is
short-circuited) the inductive impedance of the CSR is nearly 100%.
In this case, the current through the primary winding is maximum
(nominal MVA) and is approximately equal to the short-circuit
current when the secondary of the CSRT is short-circuited.
Transmission line
IL
Main winding (100%)
CSR controller
Secondary winding
IR
Status
inputs
Thyristor
valve
Firing Firing
pulses circuits
Compensating winding
in delta
Y
CB B
Line CTS for controller
R Y B
400 kV CVT
isolator &
earth switch VR
VY For controller
VB
Thyristor valves
N
Reactor
CTS for transformer
controller R Y B
Tertiary Second-
Primary
Transformers, 2/e
ary
Neutral
grounding
reactor
Vacuum
circuit breaker
By pass
chokes
Top yoke
C
C o P
C o m r
o n p i
r t e m
e r n a
o s r
l l a y
i t
m i
b W n W
D g D
G W G
D
G
Bottom yoke
Figure 23.6 Magnetic field plot without yoke shunts and wall shunts.
Figure 23.7 Magnetic field plot with yoke shunts and wall shunts.
23.5 Conclusion
REFERENCES
1. S.C. Bhageria, G.N. Alexandrov, S.V.N. Jithin Sunder, and M.M.
Bhaway. "Reactor Transformer for Controlled Shunt Reactor
Applications". International Conference, Power Transformers 2000
by CBIP.
2. S.V.N. Jithin Sundar, S.C. Bhageria, C.D. Khoday, Amitabh Singhal,
A.K. Tripathi, G.N. Alexandrov, M.M. Goswami, I.S. Jha, Subir Sen,
V.K. Parashar "Controlled Shunt Reactor—A member of FACTS
family". Eleventh National Power System Conference (NPSC-2000).
C HAPTER 24
Due to leakage field distribution during SC, heavy radial and axial
forces shall be generated inside windings. This has already been
elaborated in Chapter 7. The inner windings under compressive
stress have a tendency to fail under buckling as described below.
Buckling Phenomena
This has already been explained in chapter 7. The buckling strength
of a transformer is dependent upon the elasticity of the material,
that is, work hardening, conductor radial thickness, base cylinder,
etc. Buckling is a very common mode of failure on a transformer
subjected to SC test.
Spiralling
Spiralling involves a marked deviation of the spacer rows from their
original, vertically aligned arrangement. The spacers undergo a
progressive displacement, starting from the lower end to the upper
end of the winding generally combined with a pronounced relative
shift of the last bottom and top turns with respect to turns nearby,
Designing and Manufacturing 553
Forces on lead
Top lead
section
sections causing
screwing effect
Winding
conductors
Bottom lead
section
Forces on lead
sections causing
screwing effect
the shift being larger for the top turn. This also results in bending of
the exit leads and crossovers.
Clamping screws
End frame Top yoke
Top ring
LV
coil Forces
towards
bottom
Bottom end blocks/
block washers
Bottom ring
Bottom yoke
The lead connections from the winding ends are taken out and
connected to form a star/delta inside transformer for a 3-phase
Designing and Manufacturing 555
I1 I2 I1 I2
force itself, which is the crux of the problem. Ampere turn imbalance
occurs due to unequal turns per disc, specially in disc windings or
due to unequal duct size distribution along the height of the winding.
A good designer always aims at reducing these inbalances by
minimising and adjusting the turns distribution and duct distribu-
tion so as to result in minimum possible axial forces.
Another aspect is to enhance the axial withstand capability of the
winding itself. This is possible by decreasing the width/thickness ra-
tio of the winding conductor, increasing the number and size of wind-
ing blocks, etc.
Whenever a winding is kept in the main flux due to the design and
client's requirement, it shall experience a heavy radial force due to a
very high component of axial force in this region (See Fig. 7.1 of
Chapter 7).
In this arrangement, the radial withstand capability of the wind-
ing must be prudently enhanced. The winding ends or sections of
winding near winding ends are the most critical area and require an
adequate supporting or locking structure to arrest their radial and
peripheral movement.
24.5 Conclusion
springing and damping within the winding, effects of oil motion, etc.
The selection of various fittings, i.e. tapchanger, bushing etc. should
be done so that it is able to withstand the stresses caused during
short-circuit.
Thus for designing and manufacturing a short-circuit proof
transformer all aspects, viz. design, material selection, selection of
its fittings and the manufacturing processes are to be carefully
considered and all minor aspects including support structures, etc.
are to be verified in detail for adequate strength.
C HAPTER 25
25.1 Introduction
Live
conductor
Paper
insulation
Non-condenser bushing
equipotential cylinders
Condenser bushing
75 %
50 %
75 %
50 %
25 %
25 %
0% 0%
25.4.1 Core
25.4.2 Porcelain
Bushing for outdoor applications are fitted with hollow porcelain in-
sulators. The OIP bushings are provided with insulators, both at air
and oil ends, thus forming an insulating envelope, and the interven-
ing space may be filled with an insulating liquid or another insulat-
ing medium.
The function of an insulator is to resist flash over in adverse con-
ditions. This is determined by
(a) the profile of the dielectric.
568 Transformers, 2/e
Top terminal
Top porcelain
Test tap
Flange
Bottom
procelain
Bottom stress
shield
Table 25.1
Antifog shed
Alternating shed
The test tap is provided for measurement of the power factor and
capacitance of the bushing during testing and service. The test tap
is connected via a tapping lead to the last condenser foil of the
core within the bushing. During normal service, this tapping is elec-
trically connected to the mounting flange through a self-grounding
arrangement.
This test is probably the most universally applied test for all types of
condenser bushings. The bushing is set up as in service connected to
one arm of the Schering bridge. The voltage is applied in increasing
steps, up to the rated voltage. Capacitance and tan delta values are
recorded for each voltage. (For bushings, power factor and tan delta
values may be regarded as identical). Tan delta indicates the degree
572 Transformers, 2/e
This is the most common routine test used for various classes of
electrical equipment. A specified power frequency voltage is applied
for one minute. Under wet conditions, the power frequency test is
a type test, and is done only for bushings having rating 300 kV and
below.
Corona discharges attack the dielectric, and thus weaken the bush-
ing electrically. The corona discharges crack the oil molecule. This
produces flammable gases and unsaturated molecular residues,
which accelerates the deterioration process. Even low discharge
intensities can result in a breakdown after only a short time. Hence,
it is essential that corona should not be allowed to persist for a long
time.
574 Transformers, 2/e
Failures are also caused due to pollution. When the layer of pollution
on an insulator becomes wet, its resistance falls and a leakage current
flows over the surface of the insulator. The density of leakage
current is high in some parts, usually in the narrowest portions of
the insulator. These regions dry more quickly than the rest of the
surface, and their resistance increases. This results in the formation
of dry bands around the insulator. The voltage on the insulator is
virtually impressed across the dry bands, which results in a flash
over across the insulator in due course of time.
The current carrying path in a bushing generally has 3–4 joints from
the transformer winding to the top terminal. These joints are either
soldered, brazed, or bolted. Any looseness will cause a rise in the
temperature. If this is not timely checked, the excess heat will pass
to the insulation body, ultimately causing damage to the bushing.
Dos
25.8.2 Do Nots
(a) DO NOT unpack the bushing from the crate unless required
to be mounted on the transformer.
(b) DO NOT use metal slings on porcelain and avoid undue jerks
while handling.
(c) DO NOT store the bushing outdoors without any protective
covering.
(d) DO NOT measure IR value or tan delta value without
thoroughly cleaning the porcelain.
(e) DO NOT dismantle or attempt to repair the bushing without
prior permission of the manufacturer.
(f) DO NOT fill the oil in the bushing without specific instruc-
tions from manufacturer.
(g) DO NOT climb the porcelain to tighten the top terminal. Use
an elevator or separate ladder for this purpose.
C HAPTER 26
Computerisation—A Tool to
Enhance Engineering
Productivity
R. Mitra
DGM/TRE
Condition Monitoring,
Residual Life Assessment and
Refurbishment of Transformers
C.M. Shrivastava
T.S.R. Murthy
The need for reliable and stable systems is being increasingly felt.
Thus, emphasis is now being laid on 100% capacity utilisation and
the availability of equipment for reliable operation of the system.
Fortunately, many tools are now available or underdevelopment,
which can be used for condition monitoring of the transformer.
With a view to cover detailed information about DGA and Condi-
tion Monitoring, viz residual life assessment, this chapter has been
divided into two sections:
Section A: Dissolved Gas Analysis Interpretation.
Section B: RLA and Refurbishment.
SECTION A
Dissolved Gas Analysis Interpretation
Incipient faults in oil filled transformers are usually the result of
electrical or thermal stresses in either the transformer oil or
insulating materials.
It is known that such excessive stresses produce a mixture of
gases characterstics of which give an indication of the type of fault
and location associated with the fault.
It is recommended that analysis of dissolved gases in transformer
oil by gas chromatograph equipments is made at the time of commis-
sioning and then every six months for transformers of 145 kV class
and above.
582 Transformers, 2/e
27.1.1 Sampling
The gases to be analyzed and the criteria for the gases found in the
transformer oil are tabulated in Table 27.1.
To identify the nature of fault from the DGA results, the ratio
technique of IS/IEC is used as per Table 27.3.
Depending upon the fault gases ratio obtained in the DGA analy-
sis, the intensity of inspection is established. It is recommended that
incase of minor change in DGA, results, at least three readings
(tested in the same lab) are to be analyzed to arrive on better conclu-
sion.
In the second stage for finding the root cause and doing remedial
rectification, the following points should be checked through inspec-
tion covers after draining out oil from the transformer.
27.2.2 Core
27.2.4 Winding
27.2.5 Bushings
SECTION B
RLA and Refurbishment
The paper sample must be collected from the transformer after shut
down from lead insulation of HV and LV side after opening the trans-
former and lowering the oil level. Also, retaping of the paper with
fresh paper on the removed portion must be done. The size of paper
required for testing of DP is approximately 30 cm2, weighing around
400 mg to 500 mg.
Condition Monitoring, Residual Life Assessment 591
27.7 Refurbishment
l Use the existing core, tank and fittings. These are reusable
without having an adverse effect on the performance under
596 Transformers, 2/e
27.8 Conclusion
ANNEXURE I
Format for Data Collection History of Transformer
1. Type of transformer :
2. Rating :
3. Date of manufacture :
4. Sl. No. and make :
5. Date of commissioning and :
location
6. Insulation details :
(a) Weight of oil
(b) Weight of paper
7. Type of winding used (tick) : Spiral/Cont.Disc.
8. Type of cooling :
9. Make of oil used :
10. Quantity of oil used :
(a) In tank
(b) In conservator
11. Date and number of topping
ups done :
12. Quantity of oil used for
each topping and last date
of topping :
13. Details of breakdowns (minor) :
14. Details of breakdowns (major) :
15. Temperature data :
(a) Oil temp.
(b) Winding temp.
16. DGA and other data
H2, CO, CO2, CH4, C2H6, C2H4, C2H2
Oil parameters
Breakdown voltage (kV) :
Moisture (PPM) :
Resistivity X 1012 (ohm.cm) :
Tan delta (90°C) :
Total acidity (mg/g) :
IFT at 27 °C (N/m) :
Flash point (°C) :
Furfural content :
17. Remarks for any follow up :
Signature:
Name:
Designation:
Date:
C HAPTER 28
Transformers: An Overview
S.N. Roy
P.T. Deo
Solved Examples
Index
Acrylonitrile 67 Coil
Ambient, weighted 382, 384, 387, assembly 169
389 treatment 68
Amorphous steel 84 Cold rolled steel 86, 87
Ampere turn Combined fault scheme 463
lancing 205 Commissioning of transformer 447
diagram 207, 208 Compressibility 57
Analysis of gaseous incipient fault Condenser
450 bushing 563
Analytical method 159 grading 564
Angle ring 56 Conservator diaphragm type 264
Arc suppression reactor 483 Construction
Askarel, see Oil features of traction transformers
Auto transformer 23 489
Auxiliary limb 88, 91 of tap changers 148
Axial flux 177, 156, 160 Continuous transposed conductor
59, 62
Bell-shaped tank 272 Control of onload tap chagers 151
Breather 260, 265 Controlled proof stress copper 84
Buchholz relay 251, 253 Conventional drying 278
Bushing Converter
D.C. 530 transformer connections 531–
and cable sealing box 257 533
insulating material 565 transformer test 536–538
Cooling 177
Cable sealing box 257 classification 177
Capacitance 118 Copper silver alloy 84
distribution 118 Copper weight 210
CBIP 371 Core
CEA 370 fault 463
Chopped wave impulse 117 insulation 292
Clamp plate 92 less shunt reactor 476
610 Index