Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FY 2021 Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)
FY 2021 Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)
Department of Education
REGION III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
Weight per
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency
KRA
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s)
(Please indicate the
Shall have . . . 30% Quality
target date.)
LEADING STRATEGICALLY 1. AIP Led in the development of October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the school
school strategic and strategic and operational
2. WFP operational plans (SIP, AIP, plans were developed
SMEPA, WFP, DRRM Plan)
3. DRRM Contingency
Plan 4- 80% of the school
strategic and operational
plans were developed
1. School Report Card Led in the implementation October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the PPAs in
of school strategic and the developed plans were
2. Accomplishment operational plans anchored implemented
Report on evidence-based
planning
1. School Quarterly Ensured the development October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the developed
Adjustment/ of adjustment/catch-up Adjustment/Catch-up
plan based on the plan was implemented
2. Catch-up Plan evaluation of teachers and
other school personnel’s
3. SMEPA performance on a quarterly 4- 80% of the developed
basis Adjustment/Catch-up
plan was implemented
1. SBM Level of Practice Led the school in ensuring October 2020-July 2021 4% 5 – Improved to a higher
of the school compliance to standards of level of SBM Level of
SBM Level of Practice practice
4- 4 principles improved
3- 3 principles improved
2- 2 principles improved
1- 1 principle improved
1. School DRRM Plan Implemented the School October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the PPAs in
DRRM Plan the School DRRM Plan
2. School DRRM were implemented
Accomplishment Report
4- 80% of the PPAs in
the School DRRM Plan
were implemented
3- 60% of the PPAs in
the School DRRM Plan
were implemented
2- 40% of the PPAs in
the School DRRM Plan
were implemented
1- 20% of the PPAs in
the School DRRM Plan
were implemented
1. Innovative School Implemented innovative October 2020-July 2021 4% 5 – At least 3 innovative
Practices and practices/researches in practices created and
Researches school operations deployed/researches
implemented
4 – At least 2 innovative
practices created and
deployed/researches
implemented
3 – At least 1 innovative
practices created and
deployed/researches
implemented
2 – At least 3 innovative
practices created/
researches
conceptualized
1 – At least 2 innovative
practices created/
researches
conceptualized
4- 90-94% of the
operationalization of the
Management Information
Systems (MIS) were
updated
3- 85-89% of the
operationalization of the
Management Information
Systems (MIS) were
updated
2- 80-84% of the
operationalization of the
Management Information
Systems (MIS) were
updated
1- 75-79% of the
operationalization of the
Management Information
Systems (MIS) were
updated
Shall have . . .
Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency
KRA MAJOR OUTPUTS TIMELINE
KRA
OBJECTIVES Quality
MANAGING SCHOOL 1. School MOOE Improved disbursement October 2020-July 2021 4% 5 – 100% disbursement
OPERATIONS AND Utilization and and liquidation rate of and liquidation rate of
RESOURCES Liquidation Report school funds school funds
4 – 99% disbursement
and liquidation rate of
school funds
3 – 98% disbursement
and liquidation rate of
school funds
2 – 97% disbursement
and liquidation rate of
school funds
1 – 96% disbursement
and liquidation rate of
school funds
1. BFARS, Financial Led in the preparation and October 2020-July 2021 4% 5 - 100% of the Financial
Statements (monthly, submission of Financial reportorial requirements
quarterly, semi-annual, reportorial requirements of the school were
annual) submitted
4 - 99% of the Financial
reportorial requirements
of the school were
submitted
3 - 98% of the Financial
reportorial requirements
of the school were
submitted
2 - 97% of the Financial
reportorial requirements
of the school were
submitted
1 - 96% of the Financial
reportorial requirements
of the school were
submitted
1. SEF Annual Budget, Led the school October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the SEF
quarterly SEF management with allocation of the school
Utilization report economical, efficient, and were utilized
effective utilization of
school appropriations and
4- 99% of the SEF
disbursements sourced
allocation of the school
from SEF
were utilized
3- 98% of the SEF
allocation of the school
were utilized
2- 97% of the SEF
allocation of the school
were utilized
1- 96% of the SEF
allocation of the school
were utilized
1. E-systems for Improved the efficiency on October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 3 e-systems created
governance the management of school and deployed
data using technology (HR,
Finance, Admin, Supply
Inventory, Learner 4- 3 e-systems created
Enrolment, Learner
Support, etc.)
3- 2 e-systems created
and deployed
2- 2 e-systems created
1- 1 e-systems created
and deployed
1. PPEI Report Updated the Property Plant October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% completion of
and Equipment Inventory report on PPEI
(PPEI) in the school
4- 99% completion of
report on PPEI
3- 98% completion of
report on PPEI
2- 97% completion of
report on PPEI
1- 96% completion of
report on PPEI
Shall have . . . Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency
KRA MAJOR OUTPUTS TIMELINE
OBJECTIVES KRA Quality
FOCUSING ON TEACHING 1. School Basic Led in the preparation of October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the PPAs in
AND LEARNING Education Learning School BE-LCP and in the School BE-LCP were
Continuity Plan (BE- managing programs for implemented
LCP) curriculum
implementation,
2. Accomplishment localization of curricula,
Report and learning delivery 4- 90% of the PPAs in
the School BE-LCP were
implemented
3- 80% of the PPAs in
the School BE-LCP were
implemented
2- 70% of the PPAs in
the School BE-LCP were
implemented
1- 60% of the PPAs in
the School BE-LCP were
implemented
1. Developed Led and managed the October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the target
contextualized Learning development of local local curriculum
materials curriculum materials on materials were developed
critical content
4- 90% of the target local
curriculum materials
were developed
2. Contextualized Led in the development of October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the target
learning assessment contextualized assessment contextualized learning
tools tools to measure learners' assessment tools were
achievement developed
4- 90% of the target
contextualized learning
assessment tools were
developed
3- 80% of the target
contextualized learning
assessment tools were
developed
2- 100% of the target
contextualized learning
assessment tools were
developed
1- 60% of the target
contextualized learning
assessment tools were
developed
Shall have . . . Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency
TIMELINE
KRA MAJOR OUTPUTS OBJECTIVES KRA Quality
DEVELOPING SELF AND 1. School HRMD Plan Implemented the School October 2020-July 2021 4% 5 - 100% of the PPAs
OTHERS and accomplishment HRMD Plan under HRMD Plan were
implemented
4 - 90% of the PPAs
under HRMD Plan were
implemented
3 - 80% of the PPAs
under HRMD Plan were
implemented
2 - 70% of the PPAs
under HRMD Plan were
implemented
1 - 60% of the PPAs
under HRMD Plan were
implemented
1. Membership to Participated and organized October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the target
professional networks professional networks for professional network
by teachers and school colleagues organized/participated in
personnel by teachers and school
personnel
1. Evaluated IPCRF of Evaluated the performance October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the school
school personnel of teachers and non- personnel were evaluated
teaching staff based on the and provided with
RPMS development plan
Competent School Implemented professional October 2020-July 2021 4% 5 – 100% of the school
Personnel learning and development personnel were provided
initiatives for school with L&D opportunity
personnel
1. List of recognized Recognized outstanding October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the school
school personnel performance of teaching personnel were
and non-teaching recognized at the end of
personnel by the end of the the rating period
rating period
________________________ _________________________________________