CA DOJ--Linda Page 1 of 3

Pavlik-Keenan, Catrina M

From: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)

Sent: Monday, May24, 2010 1:04 PM
To: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)
Subject: FW: SFR Field Office messaging

Keeping you in the loop as we progress with always changing policy as it relates to SC.

From: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)

Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 9:38 AM
To: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)
Cc: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)
Subject: FW: SFR Field Office messaging

(b) ,
(6),
Please
(b)(7) see below from SC HQs. For now, the LEA can request to opt-out completely by letting any POC in the
partnership
(C) know—ICE/SC, SIB, or CJIS and we will plan accordingly.

Exact guidance on the new change will be forthcoming from HQs to all of us. Stay tuned, please.

Thank you,
(b)(6),
(b)(7)
(C)
(b)(6), , Ph.D.
(b)(7)
Regional Coordinator
(C)
Secure Communities Program Management Office
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Support Contractor
(b)(6), (b)(7)(C)
(b)(6), (b)(7)(C)

http:/ /www.ice.gov/securecomrnunities/

From: Greenberg, Randi L [mailto: randi.greenberg@dhs.gov]

Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 9:32 AM
To: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) Rapp, Marc A
Cc: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)
Subject: Re: SFR Field Office messaging

(b)(6),
(b)(7)(C)
That is correct. Only caveat, they can let any POC in the partnership know - ICE/SC, SIB or CJIS and we will all
plan accordingly.

Guidance will be forthcoming.

Randi Greenberg
Branch Chief, Communications & Outreach
Secure Communities, ICE

12/29/20 10

ICE FOIA 10-2674.0014095

CA DOJ--Linda Page 2 of 3

(b)(6), (b)(7)(C)

(Apologies for any typos as I am sending this from my BlackBerry)

From: D (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) Dav

To: Greenberg, Randi L <randi.greenberg@dhs.gov>; Rapp, Marc A <marc.rapp@dhs.gov>
Cc: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)
Sent: Mon May 24 11:54:46 2010
Subject: SFR Field Office messaging

Marc and Randi,

Please see below from (b)(6), (b)(7) (SFR). If agencies send a letter to ICE (HQs or the Field Office) or CA
DOJ, they can opt-out completely,
(C) right? I want to make sure I relay to (b) the correct messaging and do not
confuse the situation. I understand you are probably spinning right now(6),determining the exact process and still
need review by CJIS and others. (b)(7)
(C)
Thank you,
(b)(6),
(b)(7)
(C)
From: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) ]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 8:17 AM
To: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C)
Subject: Re: CA DOJ--Linda

I briefly spoke with (b) and he indicated that if agencies send a letter to CAl DOJ they can opt out completly
correct? (6),
(b)
(7)
From: Dav (C)
(b)(6), (b)(7)(C) he >
To: Arguello, Sylvia <sylvia.arguello@dhs.gov>
Cc: V(b)(6), (b)
E Du <Se arte@ >
(7)(C)
Sent: Mon May 24 08:14:08 2010
Subject: RE: CA DOJ--Linda

Good morning (b) ,

(6),
opportunity to talk with Marc Rapp or (b)(6), (b) on Friday or over the weekend? I want to make
Did you have an(b)(7)
sure you heard (C)
the new messaging regarding LEAs choice (7)(C)
to opt-out.

Thank you,
(b)(6),
(b)(7)
(C)
(b)(6), , Ph.D.
(b)(7)
Regional Coordinator
(C)
Secure Communities Program Management Office
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Support Contractor
(b)(6), (b)(7)(C)
h s@ v
619.278

12/29/2010

ICE FOIA 10-2674.0014096

ICE FOIA 10-2674.0014097
OTO/6Z/lI
7ntttffloThJs/Ad2tAkA&M/7:d4
EJO £ aThj pUTJ--fOQ VO