Innovation Management Poster - A3-1

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Effectively shifting gears between

the different phases of the


Innovation Pipeline
FOR DISRUPTIVE DIGITAL INNOVATION

An innovation pipeline is typically split into converge with different stages in the
problem fit (is the solution desirable to innovation pipeline. In our work with
customers?), solution fit (is there a way to Fortune500 companies, we channel innovation
capture value back?) and growth fit (is the processes through a pipeline to achieve just
solution technically feasible and scalable?). that. One of the big challenges in this
First you uncover the right problems to solve, Innovation Pipeline, is to know which tools to
then you propose ways to solve them. Once use, at what moment, and when to switch from
validated through experimentation, you scale- one phase to the next. Here are some insights
up. The methodologies below mostly and best practices to help you out.

WHEN YOU’RE IN THE 05



DESIGN THINKING Should the same
PHASE: project owner remain
until agile
01
 development?
Who should be trained The initial project owner during
first? Design Thinking & Lean Startup
Senior leadership should first be stages should continue as owner
trained and must have bought into the Agile Development
into Design Thinking, Lean phase so that implementation is
Startup, Business Modelling and not just ‘thrown over the fence’
Agile approaches in terms of at Agile teams and will also keep
must-win strategy so they clearly the teams stable.
see and value the strategic
importance of the approaches 06

for future business growth. How should teams be
formed?
Multi-disciplinary project teams
02
 must be setup spanning as many
functions as possible, for
Which tools & methods
example: HR, sales, marketing,
should project teams technology, finance, legal etc to
learn? ensure multiple perspectives are
included as well as driving more
Project leads must have a good
creative ideas.
working knowledge of how
Design Thinking, Lean Startup,
Business Modelling and Agile WHEN YOU’RE IN THE
Development processes, tools
and methods work in practice, LEAN STARTUP PHASE:

either from previous experience
or by shadowing other coaches.
07

09
 WHEN YOU’RE IN THE Development resource TRANSITIONING TO
Consider customer allocation, it should be allowed
BUSINESS MODEL THE AGILE PHASE:
desirability first and Who should be to re-enter into the ‘knowing
03
 foremost accountable for INNOVATION PHASE:
 what to build’ or 'problem/
17

solution discovery' phase again
When to include Teams should think in this order: failures? 12
 for a limited time before facing a Seamlessly
technical profiles in (1) customer desirability, (2) Product owners and teams
Run workshops in final pivot or kill meeting. 
 transitioning to agile
business model feasibility and should be accountable for when
design thinking? parallel development
then, and only then (3) technical failures happen, not if they
Technical Agile profiles must be
included in the project teams
viability. Teams typically happen (read: fail fast, fail often, Design sprints and business 15
 Designers and prototypers
developing minimal viable
instinctively think about how can fail early). You should celebrate model innovation sessions
during Design Thinking, Lean your failures, they will save you
Run quantitative products (MVP’s) or ‘dumb’
we build it at the operational should be run in parallel to
Startup and Business Modelling solution level first. Once you unnecessary resource wastages.
 testing at scale clickable prototypes should pre-
prevent the project becoming
phases without pushing any have validation customers Once you’ve validated your define workflows using tools like
stalled. For instance, when at the
technical constraints on the actually want your solution (and initial critical customer Sketch, Invision, Zeplin, Marvel,
team. They should silently think there is a validated business 10
 provisioning for resources at the
inception phase for Agile desirability assumptions, you Supernova and many others in
about the types of technologies, case where you can capture should be further validating your order to prevent duplicate
Kill your own solutions Development which can often
skills and resources that could value back), you can then look at MVP v0.x at scale quantitatively coding efforts across phases.
Eleventh commandment: ‘thou take time.

be needed once market-fit has how to build it. There is no point as you’re looking to see if those There are for instance many new
been reached in the future. shalt not fall in love with thy
building a business case or assumption validations hold at and emerging tools that can
solution’. Project teams must be
technical feasibility analysis if
aware of their loss aversion, 13
 scale. Run surveys or test
qualitatively using online testing
export full production code or
working assets. Make sure you
you don’t know with evidence
04
 that your customers actually
ambiguity, anchoring,
bandwagon and conformity
When should a platforms such as InVision, have your prototyping MVP tools
technology feasibility Framer, Marvel or Proto.io. 
 and processes clearly defined
Who should own the want your solution in the first
biases (to name a few). Team
place. check be done? up-front.
project? members should be their own
Before making the transition
Project teams should have a most critical critics. More about
from Design Thinking, Lean 16
08

single product owner that in our article about 16
cognitive biases that can kill your Startup and Business Modelling, How to keep project
throughout the entire innovation Need help with your
When should MVP/ decision making.
 a technology feasibility or
pipeline phases from execution
‘sanity-check’ must be carried
team momentum next innovation
to implementation phases. This prototypes be going
is essential to prevent loss of
out. It is extremely difficult for challenge? 

production coded?
momentum, motivation, ensure
Dumb prototypes should be
11
 operational teams to accept, but In order to keep the team
together and keep momentum if
Let’s have a chat.
stakeholder management and Should I test customer there is absolutely no point in
used for as long as possible, considering technology there is an anticipated delay (for 

deep knowledge of the project validation at scale?
ideally until after the business feasibility before customer instance from shifting between Board of Innovation
ins and outs. The project owner
model has been prototyped and Dumb prototypes or MVP’s problems and business case CAPEX/OPEX) the team should: www.boardofinnovation.com
should also have a clear
tested. This will allow them to be should enter into a scale-up have been fully validated with (1) Further refine the minimum
understanding of the vision, the
easily and quickly updatable sandbox phase in order to test evidence. More on how to do viable product (MVP) or dumb
customer, the business and the
without wasting time and and validate assumptions this can be found here in our prototype in short 3-day design
developer profiles whilst
resources on unvalidated quantitatively before entering validation guide. sprints to gain additional
behaving like a ‘corporate
production code. into the business model validated learning from
intrapreneur’ ideally with a
prototyping and testing phase customers about critical
broad T-profile.
shortly before Agile
development starts. This will
14
 assumptions. (2) Run additional
business model innovation
ensure your validations hold at Allow projects to move workshops to test outstanding
scale as you know what back as well as forward assumptions through clearly
knowledge and insights you are If the project fails a technology defined experiment cards
boardofinnovation.com looking to validate at this stage. sense check just before Agile
print on: A3

You might also like