Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pentagon
Pentagon
Dante’s great Commedia influenced Europe considerably from about the end of
the thirteenth century onward, and further contributed to establish the notion ol
Hell and to class it among the incontestable religious verities. This more modern
and more philosophic Hell, however, with its circles of the damned and its special
symbolism, is precisely enough distinguished from the earlier traditional Hell for us
to be able to assert that it inspired but slightly the immense impulse of sorcery which
is the subject of this study, I need not, therefore, outline the special Dantesque
iconography, which was, in any case, developed much later and remained to some
extent distinct from the diabolic iconography of general Christian origin. There is
perhaps a trace of the latter in the innermost circle of Dante’s Hell, where the poet,
imagining a supreme punishment for Judas Iscariot, the supreme criminal of
humanity, shows him chewed eternally in the teeth of Satan himself:
“ L Giuda Scariotto,
At a period nearer our own, no longer animated by the ardent faith of the
Middle Ages, and in backward countries little concerned with the subtle niceties of
civilization, the Church still displayed the Devil to the crowd in a shape brought
1 “ Ah. woe I I am mad ! ** “ No hope for us I ” “ We have lost the soul I ” “I am devoured bv
frenzy I ’’ «We are
confounded 1 ”
2 CI f That is Judas Iscariot, his head within and his legs writhing without/ ”
36
_Having arrived at a
period of imagery of purely
popular appeal, [we find numberless [monographic documents designed to produce
the same effect of mental terror as the cathedral sculptures had produced formerly.
The art of these later documents is by many degrees inferior, but spiritual barren¬
ness and the changes of time must be blamed for that;; the intention of the artists
still with a touch of the naive about it—remains the same.
37
1
WITCHCRAFT MAGIC AND ALCHEMY
loincloth. A female penitent acknowledges her faults in the confessional, and the
Grace of the Merits of Christ is poured down by Him, breaking the chains by which
another demon was holding her. A third penitent led by his guardian angel is
departing at the right of the confessional, while another angel brings him a crown
38
This last composition and others of the sort may well have been inspired by a
little popular book by the Abbe Francois Arnoux, Canon of Riez, published at
Rouen in 1622 and entitled Merveilles de l’autre monde , which describes Hell in a
style worthy of Romedius Knoll:
In Hell the devils scream one to another; wound, flay, butcher, slaughter, murder
without let or stay ; thrust swiftly such a one upon the live coals, hurl such another into
the furnaces or the boiling cauldrons. And the light women, these shall have in their
arms a dragon most cruel, flaming with Are, or, if thou wilt, a devil in form of dragon
who shall bind and enchain their feet and their legs with his serpent tail and shall clasp
their whole body with his cruel talons, who shall put his beslabbered and reeking mouth
upon theirs, breathing therein flames of fire and sulphur and poison and venom, who
with liis nose, glandered and hideous, shall breathe into theirs a breath most stinking and
venomous. And, to come to an end, this dragon shall make them suffer a thousand
agonies, a thousand colics and bitter twistings of the belly, and all the damned shall howl,
and the devils with them : “ See the wanton ! see the strumpet! Let her be tortured
indeed ! To it, to it, ye devils! to it, ye demons! to it, ye hellish furies! See the harlot!
see the trull! hurl ye upon tlus whore and wreak upon her all the torments ye can ! ”
39
Ill
DIABOLIC MANIFESTATIONS IN THE RELIGIOUS LIFE
HE faithful of the Church held it sure that the Deity could, on certain
occasions, manifest Himself to mankind visibly in various forms,
including the human. This was balanced by the equally logical assur¬
ance that the Devil could appear in the same manner. The inferior
devils, his satellites, also had this power of rendering themselves
visible, as well as the angels, the satellites of God. The interminable chapters of his
Summa Theologica devoted by St Thomas Aquinas to angels and devils, and to the
way in which they are able to take human shape, enable us to understand without
anything further that no doubt was then permitted on this point.
Apparitions of the Devil are mentioned on almost every page of the historians
and chroniclers of the Middle Ages. Certain authors would even seem to have laid
upon themselves the task of collecting nothing but stories of this sort; as instances
of such authors I may cite Thomas of Cantinpre, Caesarius of Heisterbach, Peter
the Venerable, in his two books of Miracles , and the compiler of the Dialogues of
St Gregory the Great—the admired dialogues, so dear to the Benedictines, which
were read before compline in some churches and nearly bec’ame a part of the liturgy.
Who, besides, would at all have dared to doubt those renowned diabolical appari¬
tions of which St Anthony had been the hapless victim in his desert, and which that
grave and solemn Father of the Church, St Athanasius, has told in minute detail ?
Long before Flaubert culled the materials for his dazzling, though laborious,
romance from it this celebrated narrative had formed a staple of conversation during
the Middle Ages, in the cloister, in the great halls of manors, and in the villein’s cottage.
It inspired every artist who had already depicted the Last Judgment and who wanted
to do a Temptation of St Anthony by way of getting his hand in for a representation
of the terrible and forbidden subject of the Sabbath.
The most remarkable work of this kind is perhaps that by Israel van Meckenem, a
German engraver of the fifteenth century, far too little known, who seems to surpass
all his contemporaries in the nobility of his inspiration and the perfection of his
workmanship. St Anthony is shown lifted into the air by demons (Fig. 16).
The artist has borrowed the most grotesque and alarming anatomical peculiarities
to be found in such animal forms as the oxyrhync, the decapods, and the cirri-
pedes and built these demons out of them. There are fantastic holothurians with
40
f
spines. As for the pious hermit, he has the wink and bantering smile of a shrewd
old fellow who has seen plenty of such'creatures before and knows that there is
nothing very disturbing about all this phantasmagoria once you begin to get used
to it.
The artists of the sixteenth century undoubtedly give an effect of richer profusion,
and delight in a greater multiplicity of detail in treating this subject, as we see in a
strange print by Breughel the Elder engraved by Cock (Fig. 17), but they never sur¬
passed Israel van Meckenem in concentrated power or skill in composition.
42
Callot in his Great Temptation, an immense print divided into two parts (Fig. 21),
gives the adventure of the Saint an unusual amplitude by his profusion of personages,
every one of which would merit a special study ; nevertheless, in his better-known
Tittle Temptation (Fig. 18) he reduces the scene to juster proportions, and while
employing the method of Breughel he shows a sense of congruity, harmony, and
balance ot masses not possessed by the old Dutch master. The science of diabolism
Fig, 18* The Temptation of St Anthony (known as the “Little Tempt atton ”}
is here carried to its highest point. The picture became celebrated during the
actual lifetime of the artist, and is too well known to need any discussion of its
details. We should remark that it did much to prepare the way for the scene of the
Sabbath, which it resembles in more than one point.
43
44
St Anthony was not the only person tormented by demons in his solitude,
although he was the most celebrated. If we wanted to enumerate all such sufferers
we should have to cite all the saintly existences from the remotest times down to our
own day, beginning with the Desert Fathers and ending with the Cure of Ars, and,
supposing we did this, we should find scarcely one who was exempt from diabolic
aggression. All these pious personages had bones to pick with their invisible
enemies, who sometimes became so unfortunately visible.
Demons occupied a most important place not only in the lives of the famous
hermits, St Anthony and St Benedict, but in those—to take a small list selected at
random—of St Dominic, St Thomas Aquinas, St Francis of Assisi, St Magdalene of
45
all sorts of demoniac maladies, which were healed at length by the power of the Prior’s
ritual command ; Satan often tried to strangle her.
46
To sum up, it is quite evident that the Middle Ages (and, to a certain extent, more
47
Fig, zi . Antichrist
Lucas Cranach.
modern times) were dominated by the idea of diabolical existence as much as by that
of the Divine Existence. This is a consideration which must never be lost sight of
in studying these distant epochs if it is desired to form a balanced judgment of them.
Satan figures in the iconography of the period quite as often as the Saviour, and the
existence of the Devil was then just as much an article of faith as the existence of
the Most High. The attempt should not be made to separate these two notions,
following the ill example of certain schools of historical philosophy which have
pronounced the idea of the Deity to be worthy of respect and that of the Devil gross
and ridiculous. To adopt such a standpoint is to misapprehend the fundamentals
of theology. If the Satanic concept is tampered with, the whole edifice laboriously
erected by the Fathers of the Church crumbles to the ground.
49
IV
The practical application of this logic was inevitable and disastrous. Cathedrals
cannot make a display of the Devil through ten centuries to thirty generations of
human beings with impunity; the result of the procedure will be a crop of folk
curious to see him in reality, of flatterers anxious to pay him court, and of rebels
eager to give themselves up to him, body and soul. Satan had his priests indeed,
who were the sorcerers. He had, above all, his priestesses, the witches. The in¬
exorably logical train of reasoning produced this additional consequence—that since
men alone were admitted to the service of the Lord, women, who were excluded
from it, went over in all the greater number to His obscure rival, who welcomed
them from choice. It has been said that there were a thousand witches for one
sorcerer, which is a manifest exaggeration, but it is certain that women vastly
preponderated over men in the throng which hastened to the adoration of the
He-Goat.
It is a witch and not a sorcerer who figures on the right-hand voussoir of the
western doorway of Lyons Cathedral. This extremely curious piece dates from the
5°
pointing out the witch, from the top of the towers, to a third personage, who is
setting two dogs at her and bolting precipitately into the castle by the open door.
He could also, by recourse to the Devil, obtain emoluments and worldly goods for
those who were willing to enter into a pact; these benefits were condemned by the
51
f>^
f /MmQmM
Church on account of their demoniac origin. Here again the sorcerer was in com¬
plete opposition to the priest, who taught, for his part, that worldly goods cannot
be obtained without crime except from God and by appealing exclusively to Him,
either directly or through the medium of the saints.
Some skilful sorcerers knew the art of calling up the Devil or the subordinate
demons of the vast infernal army ; this was an evident superiority over the priest,
whom theology forbade to tempt God by asking for a miracle, and who could not
consequently produce any beneficent apparition. Other sorcerers, known as necro¬
mancers, could call up apparitions of the dead ; this was an operation often con¬
founded with the apparition of demons, although the two were quite different.
We must further note that sorcerer and witch were names given to those who
were in reality possessed persons. This is a distinction not very precisely estab¬
lished, even in certain modern works the authors of which have assumed to give a
scientific explanation of every diabolistic fact. In addition to this, the manifesta¬
tions of possession were often intermingled with those of sorcery proper, and were
to be found even in that supreme consecration of the sorcerer’s varied talents—the
masterpiece of the infernal art, as we might call it—the Sabbath. This notorious
event was an assembly of the sorcerers and witches of a whole province, presided
over by the Devil in person ; we shall discuss it at length in later chapters. Not all
sorcerers, however, went to the Sabbath, nor did all perform the dark operations
we have just mentioned. Very many confined themselves to the exercise of less
maleficent arts : they told fortunes, read the future by the tarot cards, interpreted
the lines of the hand, and devoted themselves to divination by any of the innumerable
methods of which they so mysteriously transmitted the tradition. This kind of
sorcery especially seems to have been practised by the people known as Bohemians
or gipsies, and it is a point worth noting that these were wanderers, while the
Satanizing sorcerers, in distinction, were attached rather to their villages. •
Finally, there were sorcerers whom we should now class as * intellectuals.’ They
were called sorcerers because an exact notion of what we mean by e learned man 5
did not then exist. The learned man, in those days, was the man of book-learning,
who taught from his official station in the universities without departing from the
doctrines of the Church and Aristotle. But the man who made up his mind to
manipulate matter and wrest its secrets from it in the shadow of a laboratory, or to
co-ordinate the first stammerings of experimental science, was still regarded as a
variety of sorcerer, and he often deserved the name from his willingness to mix
psychic operations with what we should now consider the proper study of natural
science.
In the Middle Ages every town of Germany, Hungary, Flanders, and Brabant had
52
its old man who lived, secluded in some mysterious house at the bottom of a blind
alley. His wicket-gate was obstinately shut against the curious and intrusive.
He was half goldsmith, half antiquary, and passed for extremely rich. Sometimes
he had a pretty daughter, who was never seen except at Mass and knew nothing of
what her father did. It was suspected that he read the stars and attempted to trans¬
mute metals for the noise of his powerful furnace-bellows was heard at night—and
that he made automata (Robots we might call them now), but, as no one knew the
exact secret of his activities, it made an easier explanation than anything else to
suppose that he had sold his soul to the Devil, so they supposed this and called him
a sorcerer. This most popular personage has inspired any number of fantastic tales,
such as those by Hoffmann, The famous Doctor Faust is the finest type originating
in this convention, and is found again, very much watered down, in Jules Verne’s
Mattre Zacbarius and the Coppelia ballet of Leo Delibes.
There were monks, even, to whom the name of sorcerer was applied ; both
Roger Bacon and Albertus Magnus—who became Bishop of Ratisbon, in Bavaria-
left the reputation of sorcerers behind them. There were also sorcerer-monarchs
like Henri III and his mother, Catherine de Medicis, and, strangest of all, sorcerer-
Popes; St Leo the Great, a famous Pope of the fifth century, Pope Honorius in the
seventh century, and Pope Silvester II in the eleventh century, were considered,
rightly or wrongly, to be sorcerers, and various magical works which we shall have
occasion to mention were attributed to them.
Very numerous in past centuries, village sorcerers have not yet completely dis¬
appeared in Europe. They are still quite frequently met with in the Balkan and
Yugo-Slav countries. I have spoken to authentic witches in the French villages of
Jalogny (Saone-et-Loire), Villemoustaussou (Aude), Saint-Pe (Hautes-Pyrenees), and
Plessala (Cotes-du-Nord), and also in a suburb of Huesca, in Spain; all of them
employed the classic methods revealed in the different books of sorcery which have
come down to us.
As for the sorcerers of the towns, they are now represented by our cartomancers,
cheiromancers, and astrologers. The science of these last underwent a veritable
resurrection in the first part of the twentieth century, and at the moment they are
numerous in France, Germany, Denmark, England, and, above all, the United States.
The alchemist too is still with us, and still claims connexion with analytic and
experimental science, which, for its own part, sometimes lets a side-glance linger on
the old books, wondering whether the ancients had not some intuition of the most
advanced modern theories.
The subject which we are treating is still, then, quite a living one, although its
interest seems at first sight retrospective merely. It is only by a detailed study of
53
every ritual operation of the sorcerers that we can give an exact idea of these pic¬
turesque personages, whose predominant characteristic seems to have been an
exaggerated unsociable individualism. This characteristic has been too often dis¬
torted in biased and sectarian books. The novel crammed with inexactitudes,
written in an affected and over-emphatic style and teaching us nothing at all, is an
example of this sort of book, and in La So mere Michelet thought proper to give
us an example of this sort of novel, instead of the soundly documented work which
the erudition of the author gave us the right to expect from him.
Fig. 25. The Witch
A lbrecht Durer (fifteenth century).
54
Certain preparations were essential, and the chief were those par¬
tial reunions which we might call private Sabbaths. Details of these reunions have
been given us by various authors, and the following works may be mentioned : the
Reverend Pere Crespet, Deux livres de la hayne de Sathan et malings esperits (Paris,
1590) i J ean Wier, Cinq livres de Vimposture et tromperie des diables (Paris, 1569) ;
Jean Bodin, De la Demonomanie des sorciers (Antwerp, 1593); Lambert Daneau,
De Veneficis quos olim sortileges, nunc autem Sortiarios vocant (Paris, 1574) ; Pierre
Le Loyer, Discours des spectres ou apparitions (Angers, 1586) ; Henri Boguet,
Discours des sorciers (Lyons, 1610) ; Pierre de PAncre, L*lucredulite et mescreance
du sortilege (Paris, 1622); the Reverend Pere M. Mar. Guaccius, Compendium
maleficarum (Milan, 1626). Even if all these works were lacking, however, it would
be easy to reconstruct what passed at the assemblies of sorcerers from the numerous
engravings which the artists of the period took such pains to leave for our benefit.
We may take first the celebrated group of four witches by Albrecht Diirer
(Fig. 26). They are completing the stripping off of their clothes in order to go to
the Sabbath. One of them is a great lady ; her elaborate headdress stands up in the
style of a hennin, and a diaphanous veil comes half-way down her face. The others
are peasants ; one of them is crowned with leaves in the pagan manner. In the
aperture of a half-opened door—the door of Hell—the Devil laughs with tigerish
ferocity, awaiting those who are to be his companions at the Sabbath and later on his
fourfold prey.
This same design was engraved by Israel van Meckenem (Fig. 27) and Wenceslas of
Olmutz. The print by Israel van Meckenem seems to be of earlier date than that by
Diirer, judging by its archaistic ruggedness, and it is certain that the unduly neglected
German master deserves the honour of this beautiful composition.
In the three following prints, dated 1514, by Hans Baldung, we see four witches
at their active ritual preparations. The first shows them engaged in the fantastic
task of compounding the unguent, or sorcerers grease (Fig. 28,). Among the
55
ingredients of this were the blood of the lapwing and the bat, the raspings of bells,
and soot. One of the conclave is grinding the drugs in a little cauldron—the tradi¬
tional cauldron owned by every witch—and the others are looking, with admiration
and envy, at an old witch, more diligent than themselves, who is already riding a