Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Empower 3 Enterprise or Workgroup Software For Servers
Empower 3 Enterprise or Workgroup Software For Servers
Empower 3 Enterprise or Workgroup Software For Servers
1.2. Scope
The documents fulfill the validation requirements for the EMPOWER 3 ENTERPRISE OR
WORKGROUP SOFTWARE FOR SERVERS
1.4. Authority
This document has been produced by the computer system validation team which include {Q.A.
QC and I.T} representatives.
1.5. Approvals
Sector Representative Name Position Sign/Date
Tamer Awad IT Software Quality Senior
Ahmed Alsayed IT Manager
I.T. Mohamed AbdElrahman CIO Pharco Corporation
Ahmed Mokhtar IT Lead
Ahmed El saharty Q.A Lead
Q.A.
Mohamed Eltoukhy Q.A Manager
Q.C. Hazem Ahmed Madian Senior Analyst
Department QC
Section Central Lab
Facility General & Penciling
System Identification HPLC EMPOWER 3 ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Equipment Name HPLC 1200-I
Equipment Used For Liquid Chromatography Chemical Analysis
Tamer Awad
Validation Team representatives Ahmed Alsayed
(the validation team names where Mohamed AbdElrahman
the device or system is located) Ahmed El saharty
Ahmed Mokhtar
System Description in Brief control the HPLC instrument
Validation Start Date 03/2021
Validation End Date 03/2021
SOP: TMP Code Version Review date: Copy Page
HPLC 1200-I USING EMPOWER 3 IT/O/02 IT/VINS/001 No.: 01 3/2024 No.: 4/52
ENTERPRISE 7
2. System Overview
Computer/PLC Configuration
Model/Brand hp
Processor Type Intel Core I5
Ram 16G
Hard Disk Size 1 TB
Screen Size 19
Printer Model hp
Operating system Win 10
The user access control levels description from the EMPOWER 3 ENTERPRISE
4.1.1 Analyst rights (Attached – 1)
4.1.2 Supervisor rights (Attached – 2)
4.1.3 Lab_ manager rights (Attached – 3)
4.1.4 Administrator rights (Attached – 4)
SOP: TMP Code Version Review date: Copy Page
HPLC 1200-I USING EMPOWER 3 IT/O/02 IT/VINS/001 No.: 01 3/2024 No.: 8/52
ENTERPRISE 7
6. Supplier Assessment
Decisions to purchase software, hardware and related services from external suppliers should only
be taken when there is confidence that these will be fit for purpose.
Refereeing to {Computer System validation} and supplier assessment.
The following decision tree should be followed to decide whether or not to audit the supplier.
Where the selected supplier is not audited, this decision should be formally documented and
justified in accordance with this decision tree.
Since this validation report concern to Category 3 System so on-site audit is not required. But
The supplier must fulfill the following requirements.
7. Risk Assessment
7.1 High level System Risk Assessment
The following validation determination from points assess the system criticality if any point answer is yes then
the system has to be validated the number of Yes’s represent the system criticality.
Validation Determination Form
System Category 3
Does the application or system directly control record for use, or monitor product quality? Y
Does the application or system directly control, record for use, or monitor laboratory testing or clinical data? Y
Does the application or system affect regulatory submission/registration? N
Does the application or system perform calculations/algorithms that will support a regulatory N
submission/registration?
Is the application or system an integral part of the equipment, instrumentation, or identification methods used Y
in testing, release, and/or distribution of the product/samples?
Does the application or system define materials (i.e., raw materials, packaging components, formulations, etc.) N
to be used?
Can the application or system be used for product/samples recall, reconciliation, stock tracing, product history,
or product-related customer complaints?
N
Will data from the application or system be used to support Quality Control or product release? Y
Does the application or system deal with coding of materials, formulated products, or package components N
(i.e., labels or label identification)?
Does the application or system handle data that could affect product quality, strength, efficacy, identity, status, Y
or location?
Does the application or system employ any electronic signature capabilities or provide the sole record of the N
signature on a document subject to review by a regulatory agency?
Is the application or system used to automate a manual Quality Control check of data subject to review by a Y
regulatory agency?
Does the application or system create, update, or store data prior to transferring to an existing validated N
system?
Is the application or system the official archive or record of any regulated activity and thus subject to Y
regulatory audit?
Validation (Y/N) Y
Required
Acknowledgmen The Computer System have to be validated { the supplier make prospective
t of validation Validation }
requirements
Name/Title Signature Date
Prepared By Tamer Awad / IT Software Quality Senior
Ahmed Alsayed / IT Manager
Ahmed El saharty / Q.A Lead
Ahmed Mokhtar / IT Lead
Hazem Ahmed Madian / Senior Analyst
Eng. Mohamed Abd Elrahman / CIO Pharco Corporation
Approved By
Dr. Mohamed Eltoukhy / QA Manager
7.2 System Function Risk Assessment
Assess the user requirement and system functions using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) form, the risk assessment will start
with the main system requirements {System Security, System Access Control, and Audit Trail} if they are required in URS.
Refer to {Risk Assessment SOP} on how to determine the risk (severity, Occurrence, and detectability) figures.
System
Reset User Password Test Administrator
User Forget his User Forget his Administrator can System
5 by the system 1 Gxp 10 7 10 700 capability to reset user
1 password password reset any user Administrator
Administrator password
password
4 1 8 TS.08 Session logout after specified idle time period TS.08.01 Login with System Administrator and adjust auto-
logoff period
TS.08.02 Login with a user name and password and let the
system for 10 minutes as idle time
Supplier Elmehy ok
Done By Supplier Computerize Reviewed By IT Division Approved By IT , QC& QA
- The user will login to the computer(client) ,then to the empower system with the same
user name and password)
TEST Expected Result Actual Result Status
Login with Existing User User will login Successfully login PASS
Name and password FAIL
Check Access
1 TS.06 1 1 1 TS.06.03
control levels
TEST Expected Result Actual Result Status
PASS
Add new user User will be added Successfully adding new user
FAIL
Backup Challenge
Done by Ahmed Mokhtar \ Signature:
Reviewed by Tamer Awad \ Signature:
Restore Challenge
Done by Ahmed Mokhtar \ Signature:
Reviewed by Tamer Awad \ Signature:
10.5 Disaster recovery and continuity plan
10.5.1 NAS Storage .
10.5.2 SLA with Supplier ( Call ).
10.7 Training
Training Record for the application Exist(Y/N) Y
Training by (Supplier/Internal) Internal
Validation Y
Retrospective Prospective Type
GAMP Category 3
11.1 Validation Activities Result
Required Activities Retrospective Validation SOP Reference Number
12.0 Conclusion:
The System is successfully validated and released to use/Continue Use “starting from 03/2021”.
Validation Report Approval