Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Evaluation of Clinical and Immunogenetic Risk Factors

for the Development of Hepatotoxicity during


Antituberculosis Treatment
Surendra K. Sharma, Arumugam Balamurugan, Pradip Kumar Saha, Ravindra M. Pandey, and Narinder K. Mehra
Departments of Medicine, Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, and Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Though several risk factors for the development of hepatotoxicity monary tuberculosis in various populations (19–22) and an as-
due to antituberculosis drugs have been suggested, involvement sociation of NRAMP1 gene variants (23) with susceptibility to
of genetic factors is not fully established. We have studied the ma- tuberculosis. However, there are no studies on the role of im-
jor histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II alleles and clinical risk munogenetic factors in the development of hepatotoxicity due
factors for the development of hepatotoxicity in 346 North Indian to antituberculosis drugs. The present study was therefore de-
patients with tuberculosis undergoing antituberculosis treatment. signed to determine the role of various risk factors, including
Of these, 56 patients developed drug-induced hepatotoxicity (DIH major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II alleles, in
group), whereas the remaining 290 patients did not (non-DIH the development of hepatotoxicity in Indian patients receiving
group). The DIH group was comparatively older, had lower pre-
short-course antituberculosis chemotherapy. Identification of
treatment serum albumin, and a higher frequency of moderately/
patients with risk factors will facilitate monitoring for hepato-
far advanced disease radiographically than the latter. Further, pa-
toxicity, which results in mortality of 6–12% if the drugs are
tients with high alcohol intake had threefold higher odds of devel-
oping hepatotoxicity. In multivariate logistic regression analysis,
continued even after the onset of symptoms (24).
older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.2), moderately/far advanced disease
(OR 2.0), serum albumin  3.5 g/dl (OR 2.3), absence of HLA- METHODS
DQA1*0102 (OR 4.0), and presence of HLA-DQB1*0201 (OR 1.9) Study Population
were independent risk factors for DIH. Our results suggest that
We evaluated 361 patients who presented to the Outpatient Depart-
the risk of hepatotoxicity from antituberculosis drugs is influenced
ment or admitted at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences hospi-
by clinical and genetic factors. tal, New Delhi, between 1996 and 2000. Fifteen patients with chronic
illnesses such as cirrhosis of liver, chronic hepatitis, acute viral hepati-
Keywords: antituberculosis drugs; hepatotoxicity; human leukocyte
tis, and/or gastrointestinal, renal, or cardiac diseases, were excluded
antigens
from the study, leaving a study population of 346 patients. All patients
were treated for the full duration of antituberculosis chemotherapy
It is estimated that one third of the world’s population is in- with regular follow-up. Of these patients, 56 developed drug-induced
fected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, resulting in 8.4 million hepatotoxicity (DIH group) whereas the remaining 290 patients had
new tuberculosis (TB) cases in 1999 (1). Antituberculosis ther- no clinical or biochemical evidence of hepatotoxicity (non-DIH
apy with rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol/ group). The HLA data were compared with those of 275 healthy con-
streptomycin is very effective, but the first three drugs are trol subjects of the same ethnic background and similar socioeco-
hepatotoxic. A higher risk of hepatotoxicity has been reported nomic status as the patients.
in Indian patients (2–5) than in their Western counterparts (6– The diagnosis of pulmonary TB was based on the presence of acid-
8). The risk of hepatotoxicity, based on data from four prospec- fast bacilli on sputum smear or M. tuberculosis on sputum culture. In
tive Indian studies, was 11.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: patients with smear-positive TB, culture was not done unless multi-
drug-resistant TB was strongly suspected. Sputum cultures were done
9.5–13.5), compared with 4.3% (95% CI: 3.4–5.3) in 14 pub-
in all patients with smear-negative pulmonary TB. In patients with
lished studies from the West (9). The reasons for this higher negative smears and cultures, the diagnosis of TB was based on symp-
rate of hepatotoxicity in Indian patients are unclear. Reported toms, chest radiographic infiltrates in the upper lobes, and clinical and
risk factors for hepatotoxicity include: older age (10), female radiographic response to antituberculosis drugs. Focal disseminated
sex (11), poor nutritional status (12), high alcohol intake (11), TB was diagnosed on the basis of histopathologic and/or microbio-
pre-existing liver disease (13), hepatitis B carriage (14), in- logic evidence of TB from two noncontiguous sites. A group of pa-
creased prevalence of viral hepatitis in developing countries (2, tients with disseminated TB exhibiting classic miliary mottling on
15), hypoalbuminaemia and advanced tuberculosis (16), and in- chest radiographs was included as “miliary TB” as described earlier
appropriate use of drugs and acetylator status (17, 18). (25). Lymph node TB was diagnosed by the demonstration of M. tu-
berculosis in the smear and/or culture of lymph node aspirates or bi-
Convincing evidence has been presented for the genetic
opsy specimens. The DIH group included 13 patients with sputum
association of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR2 with pul- smear-positive pulmonary TB, 10 with sputum smear-negative pulmo-
nary TB (2 with positive cultures), 8 with miliary TB, 19 with focal dis-
seminated TB, and 6 with lymph node TB. The non-DIH group
(Received in original form August 21, 2001; accepted in final form May 9, 2002) included 126 with sputum smear-positive pulmonary TB, 39 with spu-
Supported by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Ministry of Science and tum smear-negative pulmonary TB (8 with positive cultures), 41 with
Technology, Government of India (Grant No. BT/MB/05/005/HG/96). miliary TB, 42 with focal disseminated TB, and 42 with lymph node
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to S. K Sharma,
TB (see online data supplement for drug regimens and dosages).
Professor, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New
Delhi-110029, India. E-mail: surensk@hotmail.com Diagnosis of Drug-induced Hepatotoxicity
This article has an online data supplement, which is accessible from this issue’s DIH was defined as normalization of liver function after withdrawal
table of contents online at www.atsjournals.org of all antituberculosis drugs, and the presence of at least one of the
Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 166. pp 916–919, 2002 following criteria: (1) a rise of five times the upper limit of normal lev-
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.2108091 els (50 IU/L) of serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or ala-
Internet address: www.atsjournals.org nine aminotransferase (ALT); (2) a rise in the level of serum total
Sharma, Balamurugan, Saha, et al.: Hepatotoxicity and Antituberculosis Chemotherapy 917

bilirubin  1.5 mg/dl; (3) any increase in AST and/or ALT above ment liver function test results were similar in both groups
pretreatment levels together with anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and (Table 2). The maximally abnormal values of serum bilirubin,
jaundice; (4) absence of serologic evidence of infection with hepatitis AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, total protein, and albumin
virus A, B, C, or E. levels were significantly higher in the DIH than in the non-
Laboratory Monitoring DIH group. The median time from the initiation of antituber-
culosis chemotherapy until the development of hepatotoxicity
Liver function tests were performed on all patients before antituber-
(latency period) was 4 weeks (range, 1–72). None of the pa-
culosis therapy. During treatment, liver enzymes and bilirubin were
measured monthly and whenever the patients presented with clinical tients had recurrence of hepatotoxicity with the reintroduc-
features of DIH. These tests were repeated after every 2 weeks in all tion of antituberculosis drug therapy.
patients with a history of high alcohol intake (48 g ethanol per day for Patients in the DIH group were more likely to have a high
more than a year) and in patients with abnormal pretreatment liver alcohol intake (5% versus 2% in the non-DIH group) and
function test results. In the DIH group, medications were stopped and moderately/far advanced disease (50% versus 33% in the non-
serum transaminases were measured weekly until they returned to DIH group), but these differences were not statistically signif-
normal levels. Thereafter, antituberculosis drugs were gradually rein- icant. A pretreatment serum albumin of less than 3.5 g/dl was
troduced. Tests for rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies (Ab), present in 32% of DIH patients, compared with 16% of non-
antineutrophil cytoplasmic Ab, anti-DS DNA Ab, and anti–LKM-1
DIH group (p  0.01). No mortality was observed in either
antibodies were performed in patients with DIH (see online data sup-
plement for test procedures).
group.

DNA Typing for HLA Class II Alleles HLA Analysis


Genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cell The frequency of HLA-DRB1*03 was significantly increased
pellet was used for amplification of HLA class II region (second exon) in the DIH group, compared with healthy control subjects
with a set of 5 and 3 primers, based on published methods (22). Al- (29% versus 14%, respectively, p  0.01). At the DQ locus,
lele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification for high DQB1*0201 allele was observed significantly more frequently
resolution typing of DR2 was done using generic DRB1 3 primer in the DIH patients, compared with non-DIH patients (52%
with DR2B1 5 primer (TTCCT GTGGCAGCCTAAGAGG). A set versus 33%, respectively, p  0.01) and healthy control sub-
of 36 5 biotinylated sequence specific oligonucleotide (SSO) probes jects (52% versus 36%, respectively, p  0.05). On the other
was used to determine 8 DQA1 and 13 DQB1 alleles by the PCR- hand, the frequency of DQA1*0102 was significantly reduced
SSOP method.
in the DIH group, compared with the non-DIH patients (6%
Statistical Analysis versus 27%, respectively, p  0.001) and healthy control sub-
jects (6% versus 25%, respectively, p  0.01) (see Table E1
Normally distributed variables were presented as the mean  SD.
Variables that were not normally distributed are shown as the median and E2 in the online data supplement).
and range. Categorical variables were evaluated by the Chi-square Haplotype analysis revealed that DQB1*0201-associated
test. Variables with p  0.2 in bivariate analysis were considered as DRB1*0301 and DRB1*0701 haplotypes occurred more fre-
potential predictors of DIH in multivariate analysis. Stepwise binary quently in the DIH patients than the non-DIH group (see Ta-
logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk fac- ble E3 in the online data supplement). Of these, the latter hap-
tors. STATA 7.0 intercooled version (STATA corporation, Houston, lotype, DRB1*0701-DQA1*0201-DQB1*0201, was present in
TX) was used for all statistical analysis. A p value of less than 0.05 was 17% of the DIH group but in only 8% of the non-DIH group
considered as statistically significant. (p  0.01). The other DR7 haplotype (DRB1*0701-DQA1*
0201-DQB1*0303) was distributed equally in the two groups.
RESULTS In the bivariate analysis, DIH patients with advancing age
All patients included in the study had negative serologic tests and presence of specific HLA alleles like DRB1*01, DRB1*03,
for hepatitis A, B, C, and E, and for HIV. Patients in the DIH and DRB1*07 were positively associated with development
group were significantly older than those in the non-DIH of DIH. However, in multivariate logistic regression analysis,
group, but other parameters, including the male/female ratio, when the pretreatment variables and HLA alleles were simul-
measures of nutritional status and erythrocyte sedimentation taneously considered in the model, advancing age, moder-
rate were similar in both groups (Table 1). None of the DIH ately/far advanced disease, hypoalbuminaemia, presence of
group patients had positive tests for rheumatoid factors or HLA-DQB1*0201, and absence of HLA-DQA1*0102 were
other autoantibodies. Except serum albumin levels, pretreat- found to be significant risk factors for the development of
DIH (Table 3).

TABLE 1. CHARACTERISTICS OF DIH AND NON-DIH


TUBERCULOSIS PATIENTS
DISCUSSION

DIH Non-DIH Identification of patients at increased risk for DIH is impor-


Characteristics (n  56) (n  290) tant because hepatotoxicity causes significant morbidity and
mortality and modification of the drug regimen may be re-
Age, yr 36 (16–80)* 31 (13–84)
Sex, M/F 27/29 168/122
quired. The incidence of DIH has been reported to be higher
Height, m 1.6 (0.1) 1.6 (0.1) in developing countries, and factors such as acute or chronic
Weight, kg 47.0 (10.9) 47.4 (10.4) liver disease, indiscriminate use of drugs, malnutrition, and
BMI, kg/m2 18.6 (3.6) 18.2 (3.3) more advanced tuberculosis have been implicated (5, 16, 26).
MAC, cm 22.5 (3.6) 22.6 (3.6) However, it is unclear if these are independent risk factors for
TSFT, mm 8.9 (3.5) 8.3 (3.2) hepatotoxicity.
ESR, Westergen, mm/first hour 43 (19) 40 (22)
A high incidence of viral hepatitis has been reported in TB
Definition of abbreviations: BMI  body mass index; DIH  drug-induced hepatotox- patients in developing countries (15, 27), resulting in misdiag-
icity; ESR  erythrocyte sedimentation rate; MAC  mid-arm circumference; TSFT  nosis of DIH if serologic tests are not performed. All patients
triceps skin fold thickness.
Data are presented as mean (SD) except age (mean [range]) and sex (M/F). with positive serologic tests for hepatitis A, B, C, and E were
* p  0.05 as compared with non-DIH group. excluded from the current study. All of our 56 patients with
918 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 166 2002

TABLE 2. PRETREATMENT AND POST-TREATMENT LIVER FUNCTION TESTS IN 56 DIH AND


290 NON-DIH PATIENTS

Pretreatment (mean [SD]) Posttreatment (median [range])*

Variables DIH Non-DIH DIH Non-DIH



Serum bilirubin, mg/dl 0.6 (0.1) 0.6 (0.1) 2.1 (0.5–11.8) 0.6 (0.3–1.0)
AST, IU/L 51 (29) 40 (20) 343 (21–2,662)† 31 (10–155)
ALT, IU/L 41 (27) 34 (22) 406 (28–3,320)† 40 (13–154)
Serum alkaline phosphatase
(normal range, 80–280 IU/L) 179 (71) 177 (65) 278 (111–1,158)‡ 160 (17–329)
Serum protein, g/dl 7.5 (1.1) 8.1 (0.9) 7.9 (5.4–9.3)† 8.1 (1.2–9.7)
Serum albumin, g/dl 3.9 (0.8)† 4.2 (0.8) 3.9 (1.6–5.7)† 4.6 (1.9–8.8)
Serum globulin, g/dl 3.5 (0.9) 3.8 (0.7) 3.5 (1.9–6.6) 3.6 (1.9–5.6)

Definition of abbreviations: ALT  alanine aminotransferase; AST  aspartate aminotransferase; DIHdrug-induced hepatotoxicity.
* Maximum abnormal values in DIH and non-DIH patients.

p  0.001.

p  0.05 as compared with the non-DIH patients.

DIH recovered from hepatotoxicity, and antituberculosis (11, 16). Of these, moderately/far advanced pulmonary TB
medications were reintroduced one by one in gradually in- was an independent predictor of DIH.
creasing doses, with careful monitoring of liver function. No Specific HLA alleles have been associated with develop-
patient developed recurrent hepatotoxicity, a finding that is at ment of pulmonary tuberculosis in various populations (19–
variance with experience of others (28). The reasons for this 22) and with pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex infec-
difference are uncertain. tion among the Japanese (29). We therefore investigated the
We found that advancing age was an independent predictor role of these genes in the development of DIH in TB patients.
of DIH, consistent with previous reports (10), but did not con- PCR-SSO hybridization techniques were employed because
firm previous studies suggesting that females are more likely they are more sensitive than serology and define alleles with
to have DIH (11, 14). Malnourished children have threefold high resolution. Multivariate analysis revealed that the two
increased incidence of DIH (5) and we found that patients HLA-DQ alleles were associated with development of DIH.
with pretreatment hypoalbuminaemia had a twofold higher The HLA-DQ molecules are unique among class II MHC
risk of developing DIH. Other measures of malnutrition, such molecules because both the - and -chains are highly poly-
as BMI and triceps skin fold thickness, were not predictors of morphic and most of the variable amino acid residues are lo-
DIH. We found that high alcohol intake and advanced tuber- cated on the -helical part of the antigen-binding site. We
culosis were associated with DIH, confirming previous reports found that patients without DQA1*0102 have a fourfold risk
of developing DIH, whereas those with DQB1*0201 have a
twofold higher risk of developing hepatotoxicity. Comparison
TABLE 3. RESULTS OF BIVARIATE AND MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC
of the distribution of HLA alleles in the DIH and non-DIH
REGRESSION ANALYSIS WITH DIH AS BINARY OUTCOME VARIABLE groups involves multiple comparisons. Nevertheless, conser-
vative adjustment for these comparisons by the Bonferronni
Unadjusted Adjusted method reveals that the negative association of DQA1*0102
Odds Ratio Odds Ratio
Variables (95% CI) (95% CI)
with DIH remained statistically significant.
It is interesting to note that although DRB1*15/16 (DR2) is
Age, yr 1.0 (1.01–1.04) 1.2 (1.01–1.04) associated with increased susceptibility to the development
Severity of disease†
and progression of pulmonary TB, these alleles occur with a
Minimal 1.0 1.0
Moderately/Far advanced 2.0 (0.9–4.1) 2.0 (1.0–4.0)
reduced frequency in patients developing hepatotoxicity due
BMI, kg/m2† to short-course chemotherapy. A similar corollary exists in
18 1.0 — rheumatoid arthritis, which is associated with expression of
18 1.1 (0.6–1.8) DR4. In contrast, patients with rheumatoid arthritis who de-
Albumin, g/dl† veloped D-pencillamine–induced polymyositis and nephropa-
 3.5 1.0 1.0
thy were DR4-negative and DR2- and DR3-positive (30, 31).
3.5 2.5 (1.3–4.8) 2.3 (1.1–4.8)
High alcohol intake
Our results suggest that a genetic influence associated with the
No 1.0 — MHC class II region, particularly the DQ locus, plays an im-
Yes 2.7 (0.7–11.0) portant role in the development of DIH. In summary, we
DRB1*15/16 found that tuberculosis patients with advancing age, moder-
Present 1.0 — ately/far advanced disease, pretreatment hypoalbuminaemia,
Absent 1.9 (1.0–3.6)
and the presence/absence of specific HLA-DQ alleles are as-
DRB1*07
Absent 1.0 —
sociated with development of hepatotoxicity. It will be impor-
Present 1.8 (1.0–3.6) tant to evaluate those risk factors in other populations.
DQA1*0102
Acknowledgment : The authors wish to thank Ms. Yogita Dixit and Mr.
Present 1.0 1.0
Mukesh Singh for their help in the conduct of the study.
Absent 5.5 (1.6–20.0) 4.0 (1.1–14.3)
DQB1*0201
Absent 1.0 1.0 References
Present 2.2 (1.2–4.2) 1.9 (1.0–3.9) 1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Control. WHO report
Definition of abbreviation: CI  confidence interval; DIH  drug-induced hepatotox- 2001. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO/CDS/TB;2001. 287
icity. 2. Parthasarathy R, Sarma GR, Janardhanam B, Ramachandran P, Santha

Pretreatment variable. T, Sivasubramanian S, Somasundaram PR, Tripathy SP. Hepatic tox-
Sharma, Balamurugan, Saha, et al.: Hepatotoxicity and Antituberculosis Chemotherapy 919

icity in south Indian patients during treatment of tuberculosis with hepatitis in rapid acetylators: possible relations to hydrazine metabo-
short-course regimens containing isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazina- lites. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1975;18:70–79.
mide. Tubercle 1986;67:99–108. 19. Singh SPN, Mehra NK, Dingley HB, Pande JN, Vaidya MC. HLA-A,
3. Purohit SD, Gupta PR, Sharma TN, Gupta DN, Chawla MP. Rifampicin -B, -C and DR antigen profile in pulmonary tuberculosis in North In-
and hepatic toxicity. Indian J Tuberc 1983;30:107–109. dia. Tissue Antigens 1983;21:380–384.
4. Taneja DP, Kaur D. Study on hepatotoxicity and other side effects of an- 20. Mehra NK, Taneja V, Chaudhri TK, Kailash S, Bin AJ, Chang SX,
tituberculosis drugs. J Indian Med Assoc 1990;88:278–280. Hawkins BR, Pitchappan RM. Pulmonary tuberculosis. In: Aizawa M,
5. Mehta S. Malnutrition and drugs: clinical implications. Dev Pharmacol editor. HLA in Asia-Oceania-1986. Sapporo, Japan: Hokkaido Uni-
Ther 1990;15:159–165. versity Press; 1986. p. 374–379
6. Snider DE, Long MW, Cross FS, Farer LS. Six months isoniazid and 21. Teran-Escandon D, Teran-Ortiz L, Camarena-Olvera, Gonzalez-Avila
rifampicin therapy for pulmonary tuberculosis: report of a United G, Vaca-Marin MA, Granados J. Human leukocyte antigen associ-
States Public Health Service cooperative trial. Am Rev Respir Dis ated susceptibility to pulmonary tuberculosis: molecular analysis of
1984;129:573–579. class II alleles by DNA amplification and oligonucleotide hybridiza-
7. Dutt AK, Moers D, Stead WW. Short course chemotherapy for tubercu- tion in Mexican patients. Chest 1999;115:428–433.
losis with mainly twice-weekly isoniazid and rifampicin: community 22. Rajalingam R, Mehra NK, Jain RC, Myneedu, Pande JN. Polymerase
physicians’ seven-year experience with mainly outpatients. Am J Med chain reaction-based sequence specific oligonucleotide hybridization
1984;77:233–242. analysis of HLA class II antigens in pulmonary tuberculosis: relevance
8. British Thoracic and Tuberculosis Association. Short course chemother- to chemotherapy and disease severity. J Infect Dis 1996;173:669–676.
apy in pulmonary tuberculosis. Lancet 1975;i:119–124. 23. Bellamy R, Ruwende C, Corrah T, McAdam KPWJ, Whittle CH, Hill
9. Steele MA, Burk RF, Desprez RM. Hepatitis with isoniazid and rifampi- AVS. Variants in the NRAMP1 gene and susceptibility to tuberculosis
cin: a meta-analysis. Chest 1991;99:465–471. in West Africans. N Engl J Med 1998;338:640–644.
10. Centers for Disease Control. National Consensus Conference on Tu- 24. Dash LA, Comstock GW, Flynn PG. Isoniazid preventive therapy: ret-
berculosis. Preventive treatment of tuberculosis. Chest 1985;87:128– rospect and prospect. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980;121:1039–1044.
132. 25. Sharma SK, Mohan A, Pande JN, Prasad L, Gupta AK, Khilnani GC.
11. Gronhagen RC, Hellstrom PE, Froseth B. Predisposing factors in hepa- Clinical profile, laboratory characteristics and outcome in miliary tu-
titis induced by isoniazid rifampicin treatment of tuberculosis. Am berculosis. QJM 1995;88:29–37.
Rev Respir Dis 1978;118:161–166. 26. Gangadharan PRJ. Isoniazid, rifampicin and hepatotoxicity. Am Rev
12. Rugmini PS, Mehta S. Hepatotoxicity of isoniazid and rifampicin in chil- Respir Dis 1986;133:963–965.
dren. Indian J Pediatr 1981;21:119–124. 27. Turktas H, Unsal M, Tulck N, Orue O. Hepatotoxicity of antituberculo-
13. Riaska N. Hepatitis cases in isoniazid treated groups and in a control sis therapy (rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide) or viral hepatitis.
group. Bull Int Union Tuberc 1976;51:203–206. Tubercle Lung Dis 1994;75:58–60.
14. Wu JC, Lee SD, Yeh PF. Isoniazid, rifampicin induced hepatitis in hepa- 28. Tahaoglu K, Atac G, Sevim T, Tarun T, Yazicioglu O, Horzum G,
titis B carriers. Gastroenterology 1990;98:502–504. Gemci I, Ongel A, Kapakli N, Aksoy E. The management of antitu-
15. Kumar A, Misra PK, Mehrotra R, Govil YC, Rana GS. Hepatotoxicity berculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001;5:
of rifampicin and isoniazid: is it all drug induced hepatitis? Am Rev 65–69.
Respir Dis 1991;143:1350–1352. 29. Takahashi M, Ishizaka A, Nakamura H, Kobayashi K, Nakamura M,
16. Pande JN, Singh SPN, Khilnani GC, Khilnani S, Tandon RK. Risk fac- Namiki M, Sekita T, Okajima S. Specific HLA in pulmonary MAC in-
tors for hepatotoxicity from antituberculosis drugs: a case-control fection in a Japanese population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:
study. Thorax 1996;51:132–136. 316–318.
17. Gurumurthy P, Krishnamurthy MS, Nazareth O, Parthasarathy R, 30. Panayi GS, Wooley P, Batchelor JR. Genetic basis of rheumatoid dis-
Sarma GR, Somasundaram PR, Tripathy SP, Ellard GA. Lack of rela- ease: HLA antigens, disease manifestations, and toxic reactions to
tionship between hepatic toxicity and acetylator phenotypes in 3000 drugs. BMJ 1978;2:1326–1328.
south Indian patients during treatment with isoniazid for tuberculosis. 31. Taneja V, Mehra NK, Singh YN, Kumar A, Malaviya AN, Singh RR.
Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;129:58–61. HLA-D region genes and susceptibility to D-penicillamine-induced
18. Mitchell JR, Thorgiersson UP, Black M. Increased incidence of isoniazid myositis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1445–1447.

You might also like