Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Horsley Medicine Women
Horsley Medicine Women
Horsley Medicine Women
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20688683?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
University of Nebraska Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Women in German Yearbook
The Church also knew very well that midwives used charms,
spel1 s, and incantations to assist women in labor. There are
numerous "Visitation Articles" of bi shops and archbishops
insisting that examinations and trial be had of midwives to
determine whether at women's travail they use "charms,
enchantments, invocations, ci rei es .^g. . or any 1 ike crafts or
imaginations invented by the devil." In England and elsewhere
the Church began to require that midwives be "examined and
admitted" (in effect, 1 i censed) by the bishop. In fact, it
appears that throughout Europe at this time secular governments
in cooperation with the Churches began to regulate and control
the practices of midwives. Thus an English midwives* oath of
1567 has midwives pledge that they "wi 11 not use any kind of
sorcery or incantation in the time of the travail of any women;
and that (they) will not destroy the child born of any woman. . .
." The W?rzburg-Mainz-Wormser Kirchenordnung of 1670 forbids
midwives "to induce or to pal 1 i ate the biet h or to employ
superstitious methods for mother or child." Throughout the
sixteenth century ordinances in German cities restricted
midwives' activities; they were variously forbidden to administer
medications, perform diagnostic analyses of blood or urine or use
instruments such as forceps; they were required to report
abortions, infanticide and childbirth outside of marriage to the
authorities, and to ^ubmit themselves to the supervision and
authority of doctors.
Given the intense anxieties among demonologists, bishops
and even secular officials concerning the possible anti-social
and Satanic activities of midwives, it is not surprising that
they are found among the victims of the witch trials. Midwives,
however, are not nearly as prominent in the avail able peasant
depositions as in the official documents and learned treatises.
Moreover, the evidence is uneven from area to area in Europe as
to just how many midwives there may have been among the victims
of the great witch hunts. Monter finds very few in the Jura
(126), whereas Midelfort finds many in Southwestern Germany
(187). Some of the records and (older) scholarship indicate
whether midwives are included?as in a year-by-yeajjotabul ation of
the numbers of witches burned from place to place:
10
University of Massachusetts-Boston
NOTES
*
This article builds on and further devel
also provided the basis for two earlier ar
Hors ley, "Who were the 'Witches' ? Th
Accused in the European Witch Trials,"
plinary History 9.4 (1979): 689-715; and "F
Witchcraft and European Folk Religion," Jo
(1979): 71-95.
25
28