Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Excellent (80-90%) Good ( (65-80%) Fair (45-65%) Poor (45% & Below) Content

    Uploaded by

    uwprdlrkaayibciri
    7 views2 pages
    The document provides a rubric to evaluate assignments and presentations on various criteria. It rates content, organization, language and grammar on excellent (80-90%), good (65-80%), fair (45-65%), and poor (45% and below). Content is rated based on ideas, examples, and logical flow. Organization looks at structure, formatting, and bibliography. Language and grammar assess vocabulary, mistakes. It also rates presentations on content development, organization of slides, public speaking skills like vocabulary, grammar, coordination, and handling of Q&A. Presentations are rated as excellent, good, fair, and poor based on these criteria.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Fan

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides a rubric to evaluate assignments and presentations on various criteria. It rates content, organization, language and grammar on excellent (80-90%), good (65-80%), fair (45-65%), and poor (45% and below). Content is rated based on ideas, examples, and logical flow. Organization looks at structure, formatting, and bibliography. Language and grammar assess vocabulary, mistakes. It also rates presentations on content development, organization of slides, public speaking skills like vocabulary, grammar, coordination, and handling of Q&A. Presentations are rated as excellent, good, fair, and poor based on these criteria.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    7 views2 pages

    Excellent (80-90%) Good ( (65-80%) Fair (45-65%) Poor (45% & Below) Content

    Uploaded by

    uwprdlrkaayibciri
    The document provides a rubric to evaluate assignments and presentations on various criteria. It rates content, organization, language and grammar on excellent (80-90%), good (65-80%), fair (45-65%), and poor (45% and below). Content is rated based on ideas, examples, and logical flow. Organization looks at structure, formatting, and bibliography. Language and grammar assess vocabulary, mistakes. It also rates presentations on content development, organization of slides, public speaking skills like vocabulary, grammar, coordination, and handling of Q&A. Presentations are rated as excellent, good, fair, and poor based on these criteria.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Excellent (80-90%) Good ((65-80%) Fair (45-65%) Poor (45% & below)

    Content Excellent ideas, content Good ideas and content relevant Content & ideas are Content in soft copy is poorly
    appropriate to the topic of to the topic inappropriate to the topic of developed. Content & ideas not
    assignment. Supported with very few assignment. supported with enough & proper
    Appropriate examples, case appropriate examples but Not supported with examples
    studies, illustrations used to statistics/illustrations are missing. examples/illustrations and Logical flow in concept/idea and
    support the content. consistent logical flow in the statistics. inappropriate case content is missing
    Logical flow in the content of content of assignment studies No case study included
    assignment Inconsistent logical flow in the
    content of assignment
    Organisation Assignment well structured into Assignment well-structured. Title, Assignment moderately Assignment is not properly
    sections such as introduction, body subtitles and numbering for structured. Appropriate structured into sections such as
    and conclusion. Title, subtitles and sections done but proper weightage to each section introduction, body and
    numbering for sections done. weightage to each section not lacking. conclusion. Layout is not proper
    Layout is proper given. Assignment has paragraphs with Assignment is not as per the
    Assignment is as per the format Assignment is as per the format variable font type, font size, format provided in terms of font
    provided in terms of font type, font provided in terms of font type, spacing. type, font size, spacing.
    size, spacing. font size, spacing. Only one source of information No bibliography provided
    Proper bibliography provided bibliography provided provided Late submission
    On time submission On time submission Late submission
    Language & Excellent language, appropriate Good language, appropriate Appropriate language but Poor language, inappropriate
    Grammar vocabulary and grammatically vocabulary and grammatically vocabulary needs improvement, vocabulary and many
    flawless appropriate few grammatical mistakes grammatical mistakes

    Out of 05 05 04 02 01
    S. Y.B. Com FC Internals Rubric for Project Assignment 2021-22
    S. Y.B. Com FC Internals Rubric for Presentation 2021-22
    Excellent (85-100%) Good (65-85%) Fair (45-65%) Poor (45% & below)

    Presentation Excellent presentation content Good presentation content. Adequate presentation Poor presentation content
    Q and A and arguments developed
    excellently Orderly presentation of power Content needs proper Content was not well organised
    point slides with good layout organisation and the arguments and arguments were not
    Systematic presentation. needed more building developed
    Few grammatical mistakes,
    Well-developed and good vocabulary, good Many grammatical mistakes and Power point slides not organised
    presented power point slides. pronunciation inappropriate vocabulary and few properly, loaded with a lot of text
    inappropriate pronunciation
    grammatically correct speech Good coordination among the A lot of grammatical mistakes,
    with excellent vocabulary and group members Better coordination needed inappropriate vocabulary &
    pronunciation among group members pronunciation
    Q and A session handled well.
    Excellent coordination among Slides could have been done Coordination among group
    Good time management
    the group members. better. members is lacking

    Excellent handling of Q and A Q and A session – some questions Q and A session not handled well
    session. not handled well
    Poor time management
    Excellent time management Some improvement needed in
    time management

    Points/Marks
    09 to 10 08 06 03
    Out of 10

    You might also like