Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In The High Court For The States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
In The High Court For The States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
AT CHANDIGARH
Versus
...Respondents
INDEX
Chandigarh
Date:01.07.2019
(Dr. Deepak Jindal)
Advocate
P-809/2002
Counsel for the petitioner
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Naini Jain aged 38 years W/o Sh. Vikas Jain S/o Sh.
……Petitioner
Versus
...Respondents
Chandigarh
Date:01.07.2019
(Dr. Deepak Jindal)
Advocate
P-809/2002
Counsel for the
petitioner
Civil Revision Petition under
And
RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
dismissed.
Rohtak from Sh. Harnand S/o Sh. Munsi S/o Sh. Sewa Ram
Attorney Shri Sunder Lal Jain S/o Sh. Anup Singh Jain,
her vendor Harnand has not sold the land beyond his
(ii) That the Ld. Executing Court also erred in law and
Gulshan Lal & Ors. 2010 (1) SCC (L&S) 245 and Dina Nath
petitioner.
other, grounds :-
17):-
“No doubt, the appellant-plaintiff Naini
sanctioned.”
sanctioned.
forwarded to them.”
they did not get the mutation of this land entered and
law that the mutation does not create any right, title
(xi).That the ld. Ist Appellate Court has set aside the
costs.
Gulshan Lal & Ors. 2009(13) SCC 354 that even if the
the decree.
executing Court.
Court.
Date:09.07.2019
(Dr. Deepak Jindal)
Advocate
P-809/2002
Counsel for the petitioner
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Versus
by the deponent.
India
Chandigarh
Dated: 01/07/2019 Deponent
VERIFICATION:
Chandigarh
Dated: 01/07/2019 Deponent
AT CHANDIGARH
Versus
...Respondents
Court Fees
Chandigarh
Date:01.07.2019
(Dr. Deepak Jindal)
Advocate
P-809/2002
Counsel for the petitioner