Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Commercial Advertisement and Freedom of Speech and Expression
Commercial Advertisement and Freedom of Speech and Expression
Commercial Advertisement and Freedom of Speech and Expression
The Supreme Court of India has held that advertisements, regarded as commercial
speech, form part of the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression recognised under
Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution of India. (Tata Press Limited v. Mahanagar Telephone
Nigam Limited, (1995) 5 SCC 139) As advertising is one of the elements of the right to
information, it facilitates the dissemination of information about sellers and their products.
With respect to advertising, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting is the wing of
the Government of India which broadly deals with content regulation in television and radio. In
2008, it set up the Electronic Media Monitoring Centre with a view to monitor content on
At present, the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) is the foremost body for
protection of the interests of consumers. One of the most important features of this body is its
Legislations such as the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the Indecent Representation of
Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, the Drugs and
Cosmetics Act, 1940 and many others relating to the content and ethics of advertisements have
been enacted. The author is of the opinion that the current quality of the average advertisement
whether in print, on television, radio or other electronic media, is not up to the mark and this in
turn makes us question the regulatory framework that the said bodies and legislations provide.
This framework needs to be examined at length to gauge its impact. However, in order to
understand advertising in India, it is pertinent to first identify where the groundwork for such
advertisements lies.
Constitutional Framework
In Tata Press Limited v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited ((1995) 5 SCC 139) the
Apex Court has given recognition to advertisements under Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution in
the information made available through the advertisement. In a democratic economy free flow of
the public at large without being educated by the information disseminated through
advertisements. The economic system in a democracy would be handicapped without there being
The Constitution itself lays down in Article 19(2) the restrictions which can be imposed
on the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution. The
“commercial speech” which is deceptive, unfair, misleading and untruthful would be hit by
Article 19(2) of the Constitution and can be regulated or prohibited by the State.
with advertising of prohibited drugs and commodities. The Court came to the conclusion that the
sale of prohibited drugs was not in the interest of the general public and as such could not be
“speech” within the meaning of freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1) (a) of the
Constitution. The Court further held that an advertisement is no doubt a form of speech but its
true character is reflected by the object for the promotion of which it is employed.
Newspapers (Bombay) Private Limited & Others v. Union of India & Others.( (1985) 2 SCR
287) The combined reading of both cases led the Court in the Tata Press case to conclude that
“commercial speech” cannot be denied the protection of Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution
Advertising is considered to be the cornerstone of our economic system. Low prices for
consumers are dependent upon mass production, mass production is dependent upon volume
sales, and volume sales are dependent upon advertising. Apart from the lifeline of the free
economy in a democratic country, advertising can be viewed as the life blood of free media,
paying most of the costs and thus making the media widely available. The newspaper industry
obtains sixty to eighty per cent of its revenue from advertising. Advertising pays a large portion
of the costs of supplying the public with newspaper. For a democratic press the advertising
“subsidy” is crucial. Without advertising, the resources available for expenditure on the “news”
would decline, which may lead to an erosion of quality and quantity. The cost of the “news” to
the public would increase, thereby restricting its “democratic” availability.( Tata Press Limited
case)
Further, the Apex Court has laid down that, “A restraint on the number of pages, a
restraint on circulation and a restraint on advertisements would affect the fundamental rights
under Article 19(1) (a) on the aspects of propagation, publication and circulation.( Bennett
Coleman and Company and Others etc. v. Union of Indi and Others, etc., (1972) 2 SCC 788)
The Constitution, being the law of the land, interpreted as seen above, provides the basic