Filipinas Compaña de Seguros Vs

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Filipinas Compaña De Seguros vs. Christern, Huenefeld And Co., Inc., G.R.No.

L-2294,

May 25, 1951

FACTS:

Christern, Huenefeld and Company, a German company, obtained a fire insurance policy from Filipinas
Compañia for the merchandise contained in a building located in Binondo, Manila in the sum of P100,000.
Filipinas Compañia is an American controlled company. The building and the insured merchandise were
burned during the Japanese occupation. Christern filed its claim amounting to P92,650.00 but Filipinas
Compañia refused to pay alleging that Christern is a corporation whose majority stockholders are
Germans and that during the Japanese occupation, America declared war against Germany hence the
insurance policy ceased to be effective because the insured has become an enemy. Filipinas Compañia was
eventually ordered to pay Christern as ordered by the Japanese government.

ISSUE:

Whether or not Christern, Huenefeld and Co is entitled to receive the proceeds from the insurance claim.

HELD:

NO. There is no question that majority of the stockholders of Christern were German subjects. This being
so, Christern became an enemy corporation upon the outbreak of the war between the United States and
Germany. The Philippine Insurance Law (Act No. 2427, as amended,) in Section 8, provides that “anyone
except a public enemy may be insured.” It stands to reason that an insurance policy ceases to be allowable
as soon as an insured becomes a public enemy.

The respondent having become an enemy corporation on December 10, 1941, the insurance policy issued
in its favor on October 1, 1941, by the petitioner had ceased to be valid and enforceable, and since the
insured goods were burned after December 10, 1941, and during the war, the respondent was not entitled
to any indemnity under said policy from the petitioner. However, elementary rules of justice (in the
absence of specific provision in the Insurance Law) require that the premium paid by the respondent for
the period covered by its policy from December 11, 1941, should be returned by the petitioner

You might also like