Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Accumulation of heavy metals in Spinacia

oleracea irrigated with paper mill effluent


and sewage

Chakresh Pathak, A. K. Chopra & Sachin


Srivastava

Environmental Monitoring and


Assessment
An International Journal Devoted to
Progress in the Use of Monitoring Data
in Assessing Environmental Risks to
Man and the Environment

ISSN 0167-6369

Environ Monit Assess


DOI 10.1007/s10661-013-3104-8

1 23
Your article is protected by copyright and all
rights are held exclusively by Springer Science
+Business Media Dordrecht. This e-offprint
is for personal use only and shall not be self-
archived in electronic repositories. If you
wish to self-archive your work, please use the
accepted author’s version for posting to your
own website or your institution’s repository.
You may further deposit the accepted author’s
version on a funder’s repository at a funder’s
request, provided it is not made publicly
available until 12 months after publication.

1 23
Author's personal copy
Environ Monit Assess
DOI 10.1007/s10661-013-3104-8

Accumulation of heavy metals in Spinacia oleracea irrigated


with paper mill effluent and sewage
Chakresh Pathak & A. K. Chopra &
Sachin Srivastava

Received: 16 July 2012 / Accepted: 16 January 2013


# Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Abstract The present study on heavy metal contami- for Cd (2.23) in the plants irrigated with PME while that
nation in soil and their accumulation in edible part of Fe (0.90) in the plants irrigated with sewage. The
(leaves) and roots of Spinacia oleracea (Spinach) on undiluted use of PME/sewage for irrigation increased
irrigation with paper mill effluent (PME)/sewage the concentration of Cr, Cd, Zn, Ni, and Fe metals which
revealed that there was significant increase in the nickel were accumulated in S. oleracea, posing a potential
(Ni, +227.17 %) content of the soil irrigated with PME, threat to human health from this practice of irrigation.
whereas in the soil irrigated with sewage chromium
(Cr, +274.84 %), iron (Fe, +149.56 %), and cadmium Keywords Bioaccumulation factor . Enrichment
(Cd, +133.39 %), contents were increased appreciably. factor . Heavy metals . Spinacia oleracea
The value of enrichment factor (EF) for Ni (3.27) indi-
cated moderate enrichment in PME-irrigated soil. The
EF of Fe, zinc (Zn), Cd, and Cr were <2 in PME Introduction
effluent-irrigated soil which showed deficiency of min-
imal enrichment. In sewage irrigated soil, EF value for The industrial and municipal wastewater are increas-
Cr, Fe, and Cd indicated moderate enrichment, while the ingly being utilized as a valuable resource for irriga-
values for Zn and Ni indicated deficiency of minimal tion in urban and peri-urban agriculture because of
enrichment. Among various metallic concentrations, the their easy availability and thus partially solving the
maximum concentration of Fe was observed in leaves problem of effluent disposal (Mishra et al. 2009;
(400.12±11.47 mg/kg) and root (301.41±13.14 mg/kg) Gupta et al. 2010; Ghosh et al. 2011). However,
of S. oleracea after irrigation with PME, whereas the long-term irrigation using industrial/wastewater
maximum concentrations of Fe was found in leaves results in buildup of heavy metals in soil that can
(400.49±5.97 mg/kg) and root (363.94±11.37 mg/kg) restrict soil functioning, resulting in toxicity to plants
of S. oleracea after irrigation with sewage for 60 days. and contamination of the food chain affecting food
The bioaccumulation factor value was found maximum quality and safety (Singh et al. 2010; Ghosh et al.
2011). Thus, heavy metal contamination of vegetables
through soil, water, and other anthropogenic sources
C. Pathak (*) : A. K. Chopra : S. Srivastava may pose a serious threat to human health.
Department of Zoology and Environmental Science,
Heavy metals in wastewater coming from industries
Gurukula Kangri University,
Haridwar 249404 Uttarakhand, India and municipal sewage are one of the main causes of
e-mail: chakreshpathak@gmail.com water and soil pollution (Gupta et al. 2010; Chopra
A. K. Chopra and Pathak 2012). The concentration of heavy metals
e-mail: profakchopra@yahoo.co.in in sewage effluents are usually low, but long-term use
Author's personal copy
Environ Monit Assess

of these wastewaters on agricultural lands often results electrical conductivity meter, respectively; sodium
in the buildup of the elevated levels of metals in soils (Na+) and sodium absorption ratio (SAR) (Chaturvedi
(Rattan et al. 2002). Spinach (Spinacia oleracea) is an and Sankar 2006); organic carbon (OC) by (Walkley
edible flowering plant in the family of Amaranthaceae. and Black 1934); and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN)
It is a cool-season crop that is easily grown here by the Kjeldahl method (Bremner and Mulvaney
through winter and in early spring. It is a leafy vege- 1982); available phosphorous (Ava.P) in soil by
table, and it had greater potential of accumulating extraction with sodium bicarbonate (Na2CO3) (Olsen
heavy metals in their edible parts than grain or fruit et al. 1954); and available potassium (Ava.K+) by
crops and has hypoglycemic properties. The leaves are ammonium acetate method (Hanway and Heidel 1952).
cooling, emollient, antipyretic, diuretic, maturant, lax-
ative, digestible, anthelmintic, useful in urinary con- Determination of heavy metal content
cretion, inflammation of the lungs and the bowels,
sore throat, pain in joints, thirst, lumbago, cold and The soil and S. oleracea (leaves and roots) samples
sneezing, sore eye, ring worm, scabies, leucoderma, were dried in air at room temperature. The dried soil
soalding urine, arrest vomiting, biliousness, flatulence, was sieved through 2-mm sieve, and S. oleracea were
and have been used in the treatment of febrile con- grounded in pestle and mortar. The 0.5-g samples were
ditions (Subhash et al. 2010). Keeping in view of its used for further processing. Samples were digested in
medicinal importance, the present study was undertak- a mixture of concentrated nitric and perchloric acids
en to assess the accumulation of heavy metals in the (2:1, v/v) as per the method described in Association
leafy vegetable Spinacia oleracea (spinach) irrigated of Official Analytical Chemists (1990). In short, after
with paper mill effluent (PME) and sewage. digestion, all samples were diluted with water (1:3),
filtered through Whatmann no. 42 filter paper, and in
each case, volume was made to 50 ml in a volumetric
Materials and methods flask. Heavy metals such as chromium (Cr), cadmium
(Cd), zinc (Zn), nickel (Ni), and iron (Fe) were deter-
Experimental design mined in the digested aliquot by atomic absorption
spectrophotometer (ECIL, Model No. 4129) using
A comparative micro-plot study was conducted in the specific lamp for particular metal using appropriate
experimental garden of the Department of Zoology drift blank.
and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences,
Gurukula Kangri University Haridwar (29°55′10.81″ Determination of enrichment factor and bioaccumulation
N and 78°07′08.12″ E), India during the period of factor
November 2008–January 2009 to study the accumula-
tion of heavy metals in Spinacia oleracea irrigated Enrichment factor (EF) was calculated to determine
with PME/sewage. The micro-plots (dia. 30 cm) were the degree of soil pollution and heavy metal accumu-
used for growing spinach. The experiments were con- lation in plants growing in soil contaminated with the
ducted under completely randomized design and were effluents (PME/sewage irrigated) taking soil and
replicated four times. plants growing in the bore well water (BWW) as
control (Barman et al. 2000, and Pathak et al. 2011).
Soil analysis Bioaccumulation factor (BAF) was calculated to quan-
tify accumulation of the individual metals (Likar et al.
The soil was analyzed for the physicochemical param- 2010).
eters and heavy metals before and after harvesting the
crop which had been irrigated for 60 days with PME/-
sewage separately. The soil was analyzed for various Results and discussion
physicochemical parameters following standard meth-
ods, viz. bulk density (BD) by (Carter 1993); pH and The mean values (±SD) and percentage increase/de-
electrical conductivity (EC) by taking the soil:water crease of different physicochemical parameters, viz.
ratio of 1:2 using glass electrode pH meter and BD, pH, EC, Cl−, Mg2+, Ca2+, OC, TKN, K, P, Na,
Author's personal copy
Environ Monit Assess

SAR, and heavy metals (Cr, Ni, Cd, Zn, and Fe) in 7.75 mg/kg), Cr (53.70±12.37 mg/kg), Cd (11.42±
soil before and after 60 days of irrigation with 4.63 mg/kg), Fe (1,715.80±421.33 mg/kg) except
PME, sewage, and BWW, separately, are given in Ni (58.16 ±18.15 mg/kg) in wastewater irrigated
Table 1. soil at industrial areas of Bangladesh.
The concentration of Zn (61.12±9.07 mg/kg) and
Physicochemical properties of soil Cd (13.42±4.59 mg/kg) in sewage irrigated soil were
found to be lower than the concentration of Zn
The present study observed that texture of soil was (264.09±3.05 mg/kg) and (Cd 24.66±1.87 mg/kg) in
loamy sand with alkaline pH (7.9). There was almost sewage irrigated soil of Dehradun reported by Rai et
no change in BD (+3.88 to +1.94 %) and pH (+1.24 to + al. (2011); and the concentration of Fe (446.32 ±
2.24 %) on irrigation of soil with PME/sewage for 8.15 mg/kg) and Zn (61.12±9.07 mg/kg) in the pres-
60 days in comparison to soil irrigated with BWW taken ent study were lower than the values reported by
as control. There was a remarkable significant change in Pathak et al. (2011) for Fe (487.05±59.37 mg/kg)
EC (+71.43 %), OC (+90 %), Ava.P (+116.41 %), TKN and Zn (254.65±32.95 mg/kg) in sewage irrigated soil
(+59.48 %), Na+ (+86.88 %), and SAR (+91.90 %) of of Haridwar. The concentrations of Ni (+227.17 %),
soil on irrigation with PME and in OC (+46.25 %) and Cr (+59.45 %), and Fe (+55.02 %) were found to be
Cl− (+54.12 %) on irrigation of soil with sewage. How- more in PME-irrigated soil, while Cr (+274.84 %), Cd
ever, there was no significant change in Cl− (+0.47 %), (+133.39 %), Fe (+149.56 %) were more in sewage-
Mg2+ (+20.42 %), and Ava.K+ (+38.43 %) of soil on irrigated soil in comparison to BWW.
irrigation with PME and in EC (+14.29 %), Mg2+ The Pearson’s correlation at 5 % level between
(20.42 %), TKN (+5.60 %), Ava.P (+17.17 %), Na+ (+ physicochemical parameters and heavy metals in
10.44 %), and SAR (+17.04 %) of soil irrigated with PME irrigated soil indicated that BD-P, BD-Cd, pH-
sewage. There was a decrease in Ca2+ (−4.44 % Ca, pH-P, Mg-Ca, OC-K, OC-Na, OC-SAR, OC-Fe,
to −20.56 %) of soil irrigated with PME/sewage where- N-Na, N-SAR, N-Ni, N-Zn, P-Cd, K-Na, K-SAR, K-
as Ava.K+ (−18.93 %) was found to be lower in sewage- Cd, K-Fe, SAR-Cr, SAR-Zn, SAR-Fe, Cr-Fe, and Ni-
irrigated soil used for growing of the crop S. oleracea Zn had a strong positive correlation (Table 3). In the
for 60 days (Table 1). sewage-irrigated soil, strong positive correlation was
found between BD-EC, BD-Ca, BD-OC, BD-Cd, pH-
Heavy metals contents in the soil Cl, pH-Mg, pH-Na, pH-SAR, EC-OC, Cl-Mg, Cl-Na,
Cl-SAR, Cl-Fe, Mg-Na, Mg-SAR, Ca-Cd, P-Cr, P-Ni,
The study observed that among the concentration of P-Zn, K-Cr, Na-SAR, SAR-Fe, Cr-Zn, and Ni-Zn
various heavy metals in PME irrigated soil, the con- (Table 4).
centration of Ni (206.18 mg/kg) and Cd (6.11 mg/Kg)
were above the permissible limit. Similarly in sewage- EF for soil
irrigated soil concentration of Ni (70.78 mg/Kg), Cd
(13.42 mg/kg), and Zn (61.12±9.07) were above the The EF for soil differed depending on the type and
permissible limit of Temmerman et al. (1984), Kabata- concentration of the effluents and the type of soil. The
Pendias and Pendias (1992), and Indian Standards of present value of Ni (3.27) in PME-irrigated soil
Awashthi (2000) (Table 2). showed moderate enrichment while values of Cr
The concentrations of heavy metals Cr (29.53± (1.59), Fe (1.55), Zn (1.14), and Cd (0.94) were found
3.33 mg/kg), Ni (206.18±13.44 mg/kg), Cd (6.11± to be deficient thereby indicating minimal enrichment
1.74 mg/kg), Zn (49.58 ± 3.44 mg/kg), and Fe of the soil. In sewage-irrigated soil, the EF values
(277.23±12.06 mg/kg) in soil irrigated with PME showed that Cr (3.74), Fe (2.49), and Cd (2.33) were
was lower than the concentration reported by in moderate enrichment category, while Zn (1.40) and
Sinha et al. (2008) for Fe (14,285±1244 mg/kg), Ni (1.12) were in deficient to minimal enrichment
Cr (197.76 ± 12.83 mg/kg), and Zn (104.91 ± category (Fig. 1). These EF values of Cr, Fe, and Zn
0.97 mg/kg) in the soil irrigated with tannery in sewage-irrigated soil were lower than the values of
wastewater and than the concentration reported by Cr (4.58), Fe (2.81), and Zn (2.15) in soil irrigated
Ahmad and Goni (2010) reported for Zn (115.43± with wastewater generated from the sponge iron
Author's personal copy
Environ Monit Assess

Table 1 Physicochemical properties of soil before and after irrigation of BWW-, PME-, and sewage-irrigated soil

Parameters Before irrigation BWW Irrigation After PME irrigation (60 days) After sewage irrigation (60 days)
(60 days)

Texture Sandy loam Sandy loam Sandy loam Sandy loam


BD g/cm3 1.08 1.03±0.05 1.07±0.01 (+3.88 %) 1.05±0.03 (+1.94 %)
−1
EC dsm 0.12 0.14±0.06 0.24±0.10 (+71.43 %) 0.16±0.02 (+14.29 %)
pH 7.9 8.05±0.06 8.15±0.06 (+1.24 %) 8.23±0.09 (+2.24 %)
Cl− (mg/kg) 6.53 48.74±7.25 48.97±9.63 (+0.47 %) 75.12±12.45 (+54.12 %)
Mg++ (mg/kg) 10.22 4.75±0.59 5.72±0.92 (+20.42 %) 5.72±3.11 (+20.42 %)
Ca+ (mg/kg) 20.02 45.04±4.77 43.04±8.88 (−4.44 %) 35.78±6.71 (−20.56 %)
OC (%) 1.07 0.80±0.14 1.52±0.13 (+90 %) 1.17±0.15 (+46.25 %)
K+ (mg/kg) 114 130.75±10.44 181±13.95 (+38.43 %) 106±8.68 (−18.93 %)
TKN (mg/kg) 2.06 2.32±0.86 3.70±0.16 (+59.48 %) 2.45±0.21 (+5.60 %)
P (mg/kg) 56.96 57.66±5.60 124.78±16.24 (+116.41 %) 67.56±3.56 (+17.17 %)
Na+(mg/kg) 17.30 17.91±1.59 33.47±2.66 (+86.88 %) 19.78±2.67 (+10.44 %)
SAR 1.14 3.58 6.87±0.94 (+91.90 %) 4.19±0.68 (+17.04 %)

Percentage increase/decrease given in parenthesis

industries (Gupta et al. 2008), Zn (4.8) in wastewater irrigated with PME were found above the permissible
irrigated soil (Mishra and Tripathi 2008), Cd (3) in limits of Indian Standard (Awashthi 2000). In the
wastewater irrigated soil (Gupta et al. 2010), and Ni values of heavy metals in both leaves and roots of S.
(2.28) in wastewater-irrigated soil (Pathak et al. 2011) oleracea irrigated with PME, it was observed that the
which were also in the moderate enrichment catego- concentration of Ni, Cr, and Cd were also above the
ries. However, Pathak et al. (2011) observed EF for Zn permissible limits as indicated by (FAO/WHO stan-
(7.96) in significant enrichment categories in sewage- dard Codex Alimentarious Commission 1984; SEPA
irrigated soil. 2005).
In sewage-irrigated soil, concentration of Ni, Cr, Cd
Heavy metals in leaves and root of Spinacia oleracea in both leaves and roots and Zn only in leaves of S.
oleracea were above the permissible limit of
The heavy metal concentrations in leaves and roots of (FAO/WHO standard Codex Alimentarious Commis-
S. oleracea after 60 days of effluent irrigation are sion 1984; Indian Standard Awashthi 2000 and SEPA
shown in Table 5. The concentration of heavy metals 2005). Though the Fe was found to be maximum in
(Ni, Cr, Zn, and Cd) in edible parts of S. oleracea PME/sewage, it was lower than the permissible limit.

Table 2 Heavy metals present in soil before and after irrigation of BWW-, PME-, and sewage-irrigated soil for 60 days

Parameters Before BWW After PME irrigation After sewage irrigation Permissible Permissible Permissible
(mg/kg) irrigation irrigation (60 days) (60 days) limit (a) limit (b) limit (c)
(60 days)

Cr 16.72 18.52±2.89 29.53±3.33 (+59.45 %) 69.42±6.74 (+274.84 %) NA 100 100


Ni 75.39 63.02±6.07 206.18±13.44 (+227.17 %) 70.78±5.05 (+12.31 %) 75–150 30 40
Cd 5.56 5.75±1.36 6.11±1.74 (+6.26 %) 13.42±4.59 (+133.39 %) 3–6 1 0.06
Zn 33.73 43.44±4.25 49.58±3.44 (+14.13 %) 61.12±9.07 (+40.69 %) 300–600 100 50
Fe 171.57 178.84±6.71 277.23±12.06 (+55.02 %) 446.32±8.15 (+149.56 %) – 1,000 –

% increase/decrease given in parenthesis. Source: (a) Awashthi (2000), (b) Kabata-Pendias and Pendias (1992), (c) Temmerman et al.
(1984)
Environ Monit Assess

Table 3 Correlation between physicochemical parameters and heavy metals irrigated with PME

BD pH EC Cl Mg Ca OC N P K Na SAR Cr Cd Ni Zn Fe

BD 1
pH 0.392 1
EC 0.287 −0.629 1
Cl −0.115 0.017 −0.602 1
Mg −0.148 0.457 −0.070 −0.753 1
Ca 0.134 0.911 −0.541 −0.282 0.774 1
OC 0.358 0.002 −0.255 0.862 −0.888 −0.399 1
N −0.551 −0.271 −0.541 0.884 −0.631 −0.407 0.579 1
P 0.895 0.760 −0.086 −0.103 0.141 0.545 0.226 −0.545 1
K 0.461 0.000 −0.159 0.792 −0.884 −0.410 0.992 0.479 0.299 1
Na 0.057 0.448 −0.815 0.902 −0.471 0.145 0.766 0.677 0.230 0.701 1
SAR −0.069 −0.413 −0.152 0.877 −0.963 −0.702 0.872 0.817 −0.276 0.834 0.603 1
Author's personal copy

Cr 0.037 −0.733 0.362 0.518 −0.935 −0.947 0.672 0.514 −0.346 0.680 0.141 0.865 1
Cd 0.927 0.402 0.037 0.267 −0.418 0.039 0.670 −0.202 0.837 0.742 0.403 0.257 0.217 1
Ni −0.952 −0.375 −0.430 0.413 −0.110 −0.231 −0.059 0.779 −0.862 −0.173 0.215 0.343 0.145 −0.768 1
Zn −0.656 −0.650 −0.167 0.663 −0.649 −0.693 0.403 0.905 −0.796 0.320 0.315 0.788 0.685 −0.393 0.816 1
Fe 0.408 −0.517 0.429 0.439 −0.913 −0.812 0.755 0.270 0.021 0.800 0.161 0.770 0.927 0.549 −0.221 0.384 1
Table 4 Correlation between physicochemical parameters and heavy metals irrigated with sewage

BD pH EC Cl Mg Ca OC N P K Na SAR Cr Cd Ni Zn Fe

BD 1
pH −0.454 1
EC 0.778 −0.215 1
Cl −0.293 0.981 −0.022 1
Mg −0.098 0.884 0.264 0.956 1
Ca 0.914 −0.611 0.469 −0.510 −0.406 1
OC 0.891 −0.147 0.951 0.047 0.296 0.632 1
N −0.008 −0.200 −0.634 −0.308 −0.526 0.376 −0.413 1
P −0.860 −0.065 −0.747 −0.233 −0.396 −0.674 −0.913 0.121 1
K −0.309 0.241 0.351 0.288 0.438 −0.630 0.087 −0.943 0.210 1
Na −0.305 0.984 −0.038 10.00 0.951 −0.516 0.032 −0.296 −0.222 0.281 1
SAR −0.326 0.986 −0.169 0.980 0.886 −0.471 −0.054 −0.115 −0.199 0.113 0.983 1
Author's personal copy

Cr −0.855 0.364 −0.355 0.274 0.224 −0.952 −0.589 −0.491 0.751 0.750 0.278 0.201 1
Cd 0.789 −0.670 0.253 −0.612 −0.568 0.971 0.426 0.565 −0.502 −0.760 −0.614 −0.536 −0.927 1
Ni −0.428 −0.597 −0.369 −0.703 −0.741 −0.253 −0.579 0.042 0.822 0.191 −0.698 −0.712 0.478 −0.113 1
Zn −0.656 −0.292 −0.393 −0.402 −0.443 −0.578 −0.650 −0.196 0.903 0.470 −0.397 −0.444 0.767 −0.470 0.930 1
Fe 0.329 0.629 0.174 0.700 0.677 0.231 0.420 0.147 −0.730 −0.342 0.699 0.750 −0.491 0.135 -0.977 -0.924 1
Environ Monit Assess
Author's personal copy
Environ Monit Assess

Fig. 1 Enrichment factor


for soil irrigated with PME
and sewage

The present study revealed that concentration of (62.24 mg/kg) except for Cr (4.08 mg/kg) and Cd
heavy metals such as Zn (52.40± 5.97 mg/kg), Fe (0.39 mg/kg) in S. oleracea grown in the wastewater
(400.12±11.47 mg/kg), Cr (40.45±8.39 mg/kg), and irrigated areas.
Cd (13.64±2.56 mg/kg) was found to be higher in In the present study, the concentration of Zn (52.56±
leaves in comparison to Zn (42.53±4.84 mg/kg), Fe 3.95 mg/kg) in leaves of S. oleracea irrigated with
(301.41±13.14 mg/kg), Cr (31.47±5.89 mg/kg), and sewage was lower than in spinach (Zn-85.2 mg/kg)
Cd (6.83±1.14 mg/kg) in roots, while concentration of grown in sewage irrigated areas of Najafgarh site, New
Ni (30.58±4.99 mg/kg) was found to be lower in Delhi as reported by Singh and Kumar (2006). Chary et
leaves than Ni (41.96±6.61 mg/kg) in roots of S. al. (2008) also observed lower concentration of Zn
oleracea irrigated with PME. The heavy metal con- (10 mg/kg), Cr (2.9 mg/kg), and Ni (3.2 mg/kg) in S.
tents of Zn and Fe in leaves of S. oleracea were found oleracea irrigated with sewage in the Musi river area of
to be higher than the Zn (33.10±1.90 mg/kg) and (Fe- Hyderabad.
309±27.0 mg/kg) as reported by Arora et al. (2008) in The metal accumulation in the PME-irrigated plants
S. oleracea irrigated with wastewater. Whereas Mishra showed that concentration of Cr (40.45±8.39 mg/kg)
and Tripathi (2008) have reported lower values for Zn and Cd (13.64±2.56 mg/kg) was more in the leaves,

Table 5 Heavy metal contents and enrichment factor (EF) in leaves and roots of S. oleracea irrigated by PME, sewage and BWW for
60 days

Metals (mg/kg) S. oleracea PME Sewage BWW Permissible Permissible Permissible


irrigated irrigated irrigated limita limitb limitc

Zn Leaves 52.40±5.97 (1.29) 52.56±3.95 (1.29) 40.64±4.53 50 60 100


Root 42.53±4.84 (1.76) 37.13±4.66 (1.54) 24.18±4.04
Fe Leaves 400.12±11.47 (2.36) 400.49±5.97 (2.36) 169.52±3.50 – 450 –
Root 301.41±13.14 (2.153) 363.94±11.37 (2.60) 139.98±7.47
Ni Leaves 30.58±4.99 (0.99) 49.66±4.84 (1.60) 30.97±2.86 1.5 20 10
Root 41.96±6.61 (1.19) 134.73±6.76 (3.82) 35.24±6.08
Cr Leaves 40.45±8.39 (1.97) 29.97±5.95 (1.46) 20.57±1.79 20 5 0.5
Root 31.47±5.89 (1.14) 46.14±7.32 (1.67) 27.66±7.71
Cd Leaves 13.64±2.56 (3.88) 7.23±1.03 (2.05) 3.52±0.56 1.5 0.3 0.2
Root 6.83±1.14 (1.25) 9.21±2.40 (1.69) 5.46±1.08

EF values of leaves and root given in parenthesis


a
Source: Indian standard (Awashthi 2000)
b
Source: FAO/WHO standard (Codex Alimentarious Commission 1984)
c
Source: SEPA (2005)
Author's personal copy
Environ Monit Assess

while the Zn (42.53±4.84 mg/kg) was increased in melongena (Brinjal), and Oryza sativa (Rice). Zhuang
roots of PME-irrigated plants. The Fe, Cd, and Cr et al. (2009) found that average BAF values of leafy
were found to be increased in the roots, while Ni vegetables were significantly higher than for non-leafy
was found to be increased in both leaves and roots of vegetables. In the present study, BAF values obtained
sewage-irrigated plants. It was observed that the nu- from the PME-irrigated soil showed efficient
trient status including the heavy metals was increased accumulation of Cd (2.23), Fe (1.44), Cr (1.37), and
in soil and S. oleracea irrigated with undiluted PME. Zn (1.06) from root to leaves of S. oleracea (Fig. 2).
Similarly, Kumar and Chopra (2011) have reported the The present study revealed that irrigation with undi-
increase of heavy metals like Fe, Zn, Cd, Cu, Pb, and luted concentration of PME/sewage increased the values
Cr in soil and Trigonella foenum-graecum L. of EC, OC, K+, TKN, P, Na+, and SAR in the soil, while
(Fenugreek) with increase in effluent concentration there was a maximum increase in the amount of Cl− in
(100 %) of distillery effluent. sewage-irrigated soil. Among the heavy metals present in
the soil, the concentration of Fe (277.23/446.32 mg/kg)
EF and BAF for S. oleracea was found maximum in PME/sewage irrigated soil, but it
was below the permissible limit of standards. The con-
In case of PME irrigation, the EF values (>2) for Fe centrations of Ni (206.18/70.78 mg/kg) and Cd
and Cd indicated moderate enrichment of these metals (6.11/13.42 mg/kg) were found above the permissible
in leaves and root of the crop S. oleracea, while in limits on irrigation with PME/sewage.
case of sewage irrigation, the EF values (>2) for Ni in In the crop S. oleracea, the concentration of Fe was
roots and for Cd in leaves and for Fe in both leaves found maximum in leaves/roots (400.12/301.41 mg/kg)
and roots indicated moderate enrichment (Table 4). on irrigation with PME, while in sewage irrigated
The values of Fe (2.36) in leaves and roots (2.60) were leaves/roots, Fe was also found maximum
lower than the values recorded for Fe (2.89) in the (400.49/363.94 mg/kg) but below the permissible limit.
tomato plants grown in the soil irrigated with waste- However, the concentration in leaves/roots of Ni
water generated from the sponge iron industries by (30.58/41.96 mg/kg), Cr (40.45/31.47 mg/kg) and Cd
Gupta et al. (2008). (13.64/6.83 mg/kg) were found increased above the
According to Cluis (2004), hyperaccumulating permissible limit in PME-irrigated S. oleracea. In sew-
plants have a BAF more than 1.0. Mishra et al. age irrigated crop, concentration in leaves/roots of Ni
(2009) stated that BAF values differed significantly (49.66/134.73 mg/kg), Cr (29.97/46.14 mg/kg), and Cd
among locations or plant species. The difference in (7.23/9.21 mg/kg) were also found increased above
BAF between locations may be related to soil nutrient permissible limit. The concentration of Zn
management and soil properties. They observed that S. (52.40/52.56 mg/kg) increased above the permissible
oleracea had the maximum BAF of heavy metals limit only in leafy part of the crop on irrigation with
followed by Raphanus sativus (Radish), Solanum PME/sewage.

Fig. 2 Bioaccumulation
factor for soil to leaves of
S. oleracea irrigated with
PME, sewage and BWW
Author's personal copy
Environ Monit Assess

Conclusion Chaturvedi, R. K., & Sankar, K. (2006). Laboratory manual for


the physico-chemical analysis of soil, water and plant
(p. 97). Dehradun: Wildlife Institute of India.
It was concluded that undiluted effluent irrigation of Chopra, A. K., & Pathak, C. (2012). Bioaccumulation and
PME/sewage for 60 days increased the nutrient status translocation efficiency of heavy metals in vegetables
of the soil including an increase in heavy metals like grown on long-term wastewater irrigated soil near Bindal
River, Dehradun. Agricultural Research. doi:10.1007/
Ni and Cd which in turn was responsible for the s40003-012-0016-8.
increase of heavy metals like Ni, Cr, and Cd in leaves/- Cluis, C. (2004). Junk-greedy greens: phytoremediation as a new
roots of S. oleracea. Thus, the practice of using undi- option for soil decontamination. Biotechnology Journal, 2,
luted PME/sewage as agro-based organic fertilizer for 60–67.
Codex Alimentarious Commission. (1984). Contaminants, joint
irrigation may accumulate the heavy metals in vegeta-
FAO/WHO food standards program (Vol.XVII (1st ed.).
bles posing a potential threat to human health. The Geneva: Codex Alimentarious.
regular monitoring of these toxic heavy metals in soil Ghosh, A. K., Bhatt, M. A., & Agrawal, H. P. (2011). Effect of
and parts of vegetables is essential to prevent their long-term application of treated sewage water on heavy metal
accumulation in vegetables grown in Northern India.
excessive buildup in the food chain. Therefore, proper
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. doi:10.1007/
dilution of PME and sewage appears to be necessary s10661-011-2018-6.
for irrigation purpose for the minimum accumulation Gupta, S., Nayek, S., Saha, R. N., & Satpati, S. (2008).
of heavy metals in soil and plants. Assessment of heavy metal accumulation in macrophyte,
agricultural soil, and crop plants adjacent to discharge zone
of sponge iron factory. Environmental Geology, 55, 731–739.
Acknowledgments The University Grant Commission, New
Gupta, S., Satpati, S., Nayek, S., & Garai, D. (2010). Effect of
Delhi, India is acknowledged for providing the financial support
wastewater irrigation on vegetables in relation to bioaccu-
in the form of UGC research fellowship (F.7-70/2007 BSR) to
mulation of heavy metals and biochemical changes.
Mr. ChakreshPathak.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 165, 169–177.
Hanway, J. J., & Heidel, H. (1952). Soil analysis methods as
used in Iowa state college soil testing laboratory. Iowa
Agriculture, 57, 1–31.
References Kabata-Pendias, A., & Pendias, H. (1992). Trace elements in
soil and plants (2nd ed., p. 365). Boca Raton: CRC.
Kumar, V., & Chopra, A. K. (2011). Fertigation effect of distill-
Ahmad, J. U., & Goni, M. A. (2010). Heavy metal contamination ery effluent on agronomical practices of Trigonella
in water, soil, and vegetables of the industrial areas in Dhaka, foenum-graecum L. (Fenugreek). Environmental
Bangladesh. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Monitoring and Assessment. doi:1007/s10661-011-2033-7.
166, 347–357. Likar, M., Pongrac, P., Vogel-Mikuš, K., Regvar, M., et al.
AOAC (1990). Official methods of analyses. Method no. 975.03 (2010). Molecular diversity and metal accumulation of
metal in plants, AAS method. Association of Official different Thlaspi praecox populations from Slovenia.
Analytical Chemists, Inc. USA. 15th Edition. pp. 42. Plant and Soil, 330, 195–205.
Arora, M., Kiran, B., Rani, S., Rani, A., Kaur, B., & Mittal, N. Mishra, A. & Tripathi, B. D. (2008). Heavy metal contamination
(2008). Heavy metal accumulation in vegetables irrigated with of soil, and bioaccumulation in vegetables irrigated with
water from different sources. Food Chemistry, 111, 811–815. treated wastewater in the tropical city of Varanasi, India.
Awashthi, S. K. (2000). Prevention of Food Adulteration Act no. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 1–10. doi.
37 of 1954. Central and State rules as amended for 1999 10.1080/02772240701740197.
(3rd ed.). New Delhi: Ashoka Law House. Mishra, V. K., Upadhyay, A. R., & Tripathi, B. D. (2009).
Barman, S. C., Sahu, R. K., Bhargava, S. K., & Chaterjee, C. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals and tow organochlorine
(2000). Distribution of heavy metals in wheat, mustard, and pesticides (DDT and BHC) in crops irrigated with second-
weed grown in field irrigated with industrial effluents. ary treated wastewater. Environmental Monitoring and
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Assessment, 156, 99–107.
64, 489–496. Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S. & Qean, L. A. (1954).
Bremner, J. M., & Mulvaney, C. S. (1982). Nitrogen-total. In A. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction
L. Page et al. (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. with sodium bicarbonate. CireUSQep. Agri. Q 39.
Chemical and microbiological properties (pp. 595–624). Pathak, C., Chopra, A. K., Kumar, V., & Sharma, S. (2011).
Madison: American Society of Agronomy. Effect of sewage-water irrigation on physico-chemical
Carter, M. R. (1993). Soil sampling and method of analysis. parameters with special reference to heavy metals in agri-
Boca Raton: Lewis. cultural soil of Haridwar city. Journal of Applied and
Chary, N. S., Kamala, C. T., & Raj, D. S. (2008). Assessing risk Natural Science, 3, 108–113.
of heavy metals from consuming food grown on sewage Rai, S., Chopra, A. K., Pathak, C., Sharma, D. K., Sharma, R.,
irrigated soils and food chain transfer. Ecotoxicology and & Gupta, P. M. (2011). Comparative study of some phys-
Environmental Safety, 69, 513–524. icochemical parameters of soil irrigated with sewage water
Author's personal copy
Environ Monit Assess

and canal water of Dehradun city, India. Archives of applications: effects of treated wastewater and ground wa-
Applied Science Research, 3, 318–325. ter used for irrigation. Environmental Geochemistry and
Rattan, R. K., Datta, S. P., Chandra, S., & Saharan, N. (2002). Health, 30, 407–422.
Heavy metals and environmental quality: Indian scenario. Subhash, G. P., Virbhadrappa, S. R., & Vasant, O. K. (2010).
Fertility News, 47, 21–40. Spinacia oleracea LINN: a pharmacognostic and pharma-
SEPA (2005). The limits of pollutants in food. China: State cological overview. IJRAP, 1, 78–84.
Environmental Protection Administration. GB2762-2005. Temmerman, L. O., Hoeing, M., & Scokart, P. O. (1984).
Singh, S., & Kumar, M. (2006). Heavy metal load of soil, water Determination of ‘normal’ levels and upper limit values
and vegetables in peri-urban Delhi. Environmental of trace elements in soils. Zournal Pflanzenernahr
Monitoring and Assessment, 120, 79–91. Bodenkd, 147, 687–694. doi:10.1002/jpln.19841470606.
Singh, A., Sharma, R. K., Agrawal, M., & Marshall, F. M. Walkley, A., & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the
(2010). Health risk assessment of heavy metals via dietary Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and
intake of foodstuffs from the wastewater irrigated site of a a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration meth-
dry tropical area of India. Food and Chemical Toxicology, od. Soil Science, 37, 29–38.
48, 611–619. Zhuang, P., McBride, M. B., Xia, H., Li, N., & Li, Z. (2009).
Sinha, S., Singh, S., & Mallick, S. (2008). Comparative growth Health risk from heavy metals via consumption of food
response of two varieties of Vigna radiata L. (var. PDM 54 crops in the vicinity of Dabaoshan mine, South China.
and var. NM 1) grown on different tannery sludge Science of the Total Environment, 407, 1551–1561.

You might also like