Name of Employees: SEBASTIAN, MARI JEAN F.

Rater:
Position: TEACHER III Position:
Employee ID No: 0000000000 Date of Review:
Employment Status: REGULAR PERMANENT Rating Period:
Age: 95
Sex: FEMALE Number of Years in Teaching:
Level Taught: ELEMENTARY Highest Degree Obtained:
Grade level Taught: GRADES 6
Subject Taught: ENGLISH, ESP, MAPEH Area of Specialization

COT 1 COT 2
Weight per Weight per COT
KRA Objectives Indicator
KRA Objective Number RPMS
Rating 5-pt Scale Rating
Objective 1 8.0% 1 7 5 7
KRA 1 Objective 2 8.0% 7 5 5
Objective 3 8.0% 7 5 5
Objective 4 8.0% 7 5 5
KRA 2 Objective 5 8.0% 2 7 5 7
Objective 6 8.0% 7 5 5
Objective 7 8.0% 3 7 5 7
KRA 3
Objective 8 8.0%
Objective 9 8.0%
KRA 4 Objective 10 8.0%
Objective 11 8.0%
Plus Factor Objective 12 12.0%
Date Observed
 MARI JEAN F. SEBASTIAN Region: REGION IX
MASTER TEACHER I Division: ZAMBOANGA CITY
District/Municipality: SINUNUC
2020-2021 School Name: SINUNUC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
School ID: 126104
10 YEARS School Type: URBAN
CAR School Small: VERY LARGE
Curr. Classification: K TO 12
GENERAL EDUCATION

COT 2
IPCRF Numerical Ratings
Ave Score Adjectival Rating
RPMS
5-pt Scale Q E T Average
5 5 5.000 5.000 0.400 Very Satisfactory
3 4 5.000 5.000 0.400 Very Satisfactory
3 4 5.000 5.000 0.400 Very Satisfactory
3 4 5.000 5.000 0.400 Very Satisfactory
5 5 5.000 5.000 0.400 Very Satisfactory
3 4 5.000 5.000 5.000 0.400 Very Satisfactory
5 5 5.000 5.000 0.400 Very Satisfactory
5.000 5.000 0.400 Very Satisfactory
5.000 2.000 3.500 0.280 Satisfactory
5.000 5.000 5.000 0.400 Very Satisfactory
5.000 5.000 5.000 0.400 Very Satisfactory
5.000 5.000 5.000 0.600 Outstanding
Final Rating 4.88
Adjectival Rating Outstanding
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: MICHAEL T. PATIÑO Name of Rater: MARI JEAN F. SEBASTIAN
Position: TEACHER III Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review: JANUARY 2021
Rating Period: 2020-2021

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 3.5 3.500 0.280
Services Knowledge and knowledge of Level 7 in Objective Level 6 in Objective Level 5 in Objective Level 5 in Objective Level 3 in Objective 1
Pedagogy content within and 1 as shown in COT 1 as shown in COT 1 as shown in COT 1 as shown in COT as shown in COT
rating sheets
across curriculum rating rating rating rating
/interobserver
teaching areas. sheets/interobserve sheets/interobserve sheets/interobserve sheets/interobserve agreement forms
r agreement forms r agreement forms r agreement forms r agreement forms or No acceptable
8.0%
evidence was
shown

Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Ensured Quality Ensured that the Ensured that the Ensured that the Ensured that ICT No acceptable Ensured that the 5 5.000 0.400
Services the positive ICT used redefine ICT used augment ICT used modify are used but do not evidence was ICT used redefine
use of ICT to and transform and enrich learning processes and create a new shown and transform
facilitate the learning experiences and improve learning learning experience learning experiences
teaching and experiences and are documented experiences and and/or are and are documented
learning are documented properly and are documented documented properly and
process properly and consistently using properly and but not consistent consistently using
consistently using any referencing consistently with one any referencing
8.0% any referencing style as shown in using any referencing style as style as shown in the
style as shown in the submitted referencing shown in the submitted learning
the submitted learning material style as shown submitted learning material
learning material in the submitted material
learning material

Efficiency
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Applied a Quality Applied teaching Applied Applied Applied No acceptable Applied 4 4.000 0.320
Services range of strategies that teaching teaching teaching evidence was teaching
teaching challenge strategies that strategies that strategies that shown strategies that
strategies to learners to require require lead learners require
develop draw learners to learners to along a single learners to
critical and conclusions make describe and path of inquiry make
creative and justify their connections explain ideas and/or to connections
thinking, as thinking or put using ideas learned as simple recall using ideas
well as other parts together learned as shown in the and rote learned as
higher-order to promote shown in the submitted memorization shown in the
thinking 8.0% deeper submitted learning of concepts as submitted
skills understanding of learning material shown in the learning
ideas learned as material submitted material
shown in the learning
submitted material
learning material

Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Diversity of 4. Established Quality Utilized effective Utilized effective Utilized an Utilized a No acceptable Utilized effective 4 4.000 0.320
Services Learners & a learnercentered teaching teaching effective teaching evidence was teaching
Assessment culture by strategies that strategies that teaching strategy or shown strategies that
and Reporting using teaching are appropriate are appropriate strategy that is strategies that are appropriate
strategies that in responding to in responding to appropriate in partially in responding to
respond to learners’ learners’ responding to respond to learners’
their linguistic, linguistic, cultural, linguistic, learners’ learners’ linguistic,
cultural, socioeconomic, cultural, linguistic, linguistic, cultural,
socioeconomic or religious socioeconomic, cultural, cultural, socioeconomic,
and religious backgrounds at or religious socioeconomic, socioeconomic, or religious
backgrounds 8.0% an individual backgrounds at a or religious or religious backgrounds at a
level* as shown group level* as backgrounds backgrounds as group level* as
in the submitted shown in the as shown in shown in the shown in the
learning material submitted the submitted submitted submitted
learning material learning learning learning material
material material

Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Planned and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable 3.5 3.500 0.280
Services delivered teaching Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in evidence was
strategies that are Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as shown
responsive to the shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
special rating rating rating rating
educational needs sheets/interobserve sheets/interobserve sheets/interobserve sheets/interobserve
of learners in r r r r
difficult agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
circumstances*,
including:
geographic
isolation; chronic 8.0%
illness;
displacement due
to armed conflict,
urban
resettlement or
disasters; child
abuse and child
labor practices

Efficiency
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 6. Used Quality Provided learners Provided Provided Provided No evidence was Provided learners 5 4 4.500 0.36
Services strategies for with accurate, learners with learners with learners with shown with accurate,
providing and specific and accurate, and accurate, and inaccurate and specific and
timely, accurate directed specific general
MOV and/or directed
and constructive constructive
MOV constructive
submitted destructive constructive
constructive feedback* as feedback
submittedas feedback
shows feedback
MOV submitted feedback* as
8.0% shown
feedback to shownsubmitted
MOV in the shows in the as shown in
feedback as shown in the
shows shown in the
improve learner evidence
shows feedback evidence
feedback the evidence
given within evidence given
feedback evidence
performance submitted
given within 5 submitted
given within submitted
11-20 submitted
beyond 20 submitted
working days 6-10 working working days working days
Efficiency from days from from from
Timeliness submission** submission** submission** submission** No evidence was
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Selected, Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated shown
Demonstrated Demonstrated 4 4.000 0.32
Services and Planning developed, Level 7 in Objective Level 6 in Objective Level 5 in Objective Level 4 in Objective Level 3 in Objective Level 6 in Objective 7
organized 7 as shown in COT 7 as shown in COT 7 as shown in COT 7 as shown in COT 7 as shown in COT as shown in COT
and used rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets
appropriate /interobserver /interobserver /interobserver /interobserver /interobserver /interobserver
teaching and agreement forms agreement forms agreement agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
learning 8.0% forms or No acceptable
resources, evidence was
including ICT, shown
to address
learning
goals
Efficiency
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 8. Set Quality All of the Majority of Half of the Less than half No acceptable 4 4.000 0.32
Services achievable and learning the learning learning of the learning evidence was
appropriate outcomes set outcomes set outcomes set outcomes set shown
learning are aligned are aligned are aligned are aligned with
outcomes that with the with the with the the learning
are aligned learning learning learning competencies
8.0%
with learning competencies competencies competencies as shown in the
competencies as shown in as shown in as shown in MOV submitted
the MOV the MOV the MOV
submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Community 9. Built Quality Sustained Secured Communicated Communicated No acceptable 5 4 4.500 0.36
Services Linkages and relationships engagement collaboration with and with parents/ evidence was
Professional with parents/ with parents/ with parents/ obtained guardians and/or shown
Engagement & guardians guardians guardians response from wider school
Personal and the wider and/or wider and/or wider parents/ community to
Growth and school school school guardians and/or facilitate
Professional community to community to community to wider school involvement in
Development facilitate 8.0% facilitate facilitate community to the educative
involvement involvement in involvement in facilitate process but
in the the educative the educative involvement in received no
educative Efficiency Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
process 4 of the 3 of the of the of the evidence was
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable shown
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 10. Participated Quality Participated in Participated in Participated in Participated in No acceptable 5 5 5 0.4
Services in professional any professional any professional any professional any evidence was
networks to network/activity network/activity network/activity professional shown
share that requires that requires that requires network/activity
knowledge and output* and output* and output* to share that does not
to enhance proof of proof of knowledge and require output
practice implementation implementation to enhance to share
** within the ** within the practice as knowledge and
school to share department/ evidenced by to enhance
knowledge and grade level to the submitted practice as
to enhance share MOV evidenced by
practice as knowledge and the submitted
8.0% evidenced by to enhance MOV
the submitted practice as
MOV evidenced by
the submitted
MOV

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No acceptable

different kinds different kinds different kinds 1 of the evidence was
of acceptable of acceptable of acceptable acceptable shown
MOV*** MOV*** MOV*** MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Developed a Quality Updated the Discussed Accomplishe Accomplished No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.360
Services personal Development progress on d the the Strengths evidence was
improvement Plan and the Development and shown
plan based on approved by Development Plan from Development
reflection of the rater during Plan with the learning Needs portion of
one’s practice Phase II of the rater to check objectives up the Development
and ongoing RPMS cycle whether to resources Plan after
professional Development needed to selfassessment at
learning Needs were address the beginning of
addressed Development the school year
Needs during
8.0% Phase I of the
RPMS cycle

Efficiency Submitted the Submitted the Submitted the No acceptable

Submitted the
IPCRF-DP with IPCRF-DP with IPCRF-DP with evidence was
IPCRF-DP with
any 4 of the any 2 of the any 1 of the shown
any 3 of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable
acceptable
Supporting Supporting Supporting
Supporting
MOV* MOV* MOV
MOV*
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education PLUS FACTOR 12.Performed Quality Performed at Performed at Performed at Performed at No acceptable 5 5 5 0.6
Services various related least 1 related least 1 related least 1 related least 1 related evidence was
works/activities work/activity work/activity work/activity work/activity that shown
that contribute that contributed that contributed that contributed to
to the to the to the contributed to the
teachinglearning teachinglearning teachinglearning the teachinglearning
process process process within teachinglearning process
beyond the the school/ process within within the class
school/ Community the learning as evidenced by
12.0% Community Learning area/ submitted MOV
Learning Center (CLC) department as
Center (CLC) as evidenced evidenced by
as evidenced by submitted submitted
by submitted
Efficiency Submitted any MOV
Submitted any MOV
Submitted any Submitted any 1 No acceptable
4MOV
of the 3 of the 2 of the of the evidence was
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable shown
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Very Satisfactory 4.320
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory MICHAEL T. PATIÑO MARI JEAN F. SEBASTIAN EVELYN S. CABANIERO
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management
1 1 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development.
2 Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and
1 takes into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the 1
organization.
3 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher
1 goals.
4 Prioritizes work tasks and schedules (through Gantt charts, checklists, etc.) to
1 achieve goals.
5
1 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.
Professionalism and Ethics
1 Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and
1 Ethical Standards for public officials and employees (RA 6713).
2 Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the
1 impact of his/her actions and decisions.
3 Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and
1 punctuality, good grooming and communication.
1 4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet organization’s needs.
5 Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet organization’s needs,
1 improve systems and help others improve their effectiveness.
Result Focus
1 1 Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
2 Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by
1 placing organizational needs before personal needs.
3 Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating 1
procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality
of work in terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no
supervision required.
4 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or
1 inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve
performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower
1 cost, more efficiently, or improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale,
without setting any specific goal.
1
PART II: COMPETENCIES
CORE SKILLS
Teamwork Oral Communication
1 1 Willingly does his/her share of responsibility. 1 1 Follows instruction accurately.
Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal
2 accomplishment across the organization. 1 2 Expresses self clearly, fluently and accurately.
1 3 Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. 1 3 Uses appropriate medium for the message
1 4 Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions. 1 4 Adjust communication styles to others.
5 Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to
1 accomplish organizational goals and objectives. 1 5 Guides discussions between and among peers to meet an objective.
Service Orientation Written Communication
1
1 1 Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems. 1 Knows the different written business communication formats used in DepEd.
2 Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer 2 Writes routine correspondence/communications, narrative and descriptive
1 service issues and concerns.
1 report based on readily available information data with minimal spelling or
grammatical errors (e.g. memos, minutes, etc.)
3 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.
3 Secures information from required references (i.e., Directories, schedules,
1
4 Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates and strategies notices, instructions) for specific purposes.
1 based on DepEd strategies and directions. 4
1 Self-edits words, numbers, phonethic notation and content, if necessary.
5 Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified
1 procedures that will further enhance service delivery.
5 Demonstrates clarity, fluency, impact, conciseness and effectiveness in his/her
1
Innovation written communications.
1 Computer/ICT Skills
Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Fosters 1 Prepares basic compositions (e.g., letters, reports, spreadsheets and graphics
1 new ideas, processes, and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or 1
presentation using Word Processing and Excel).
operational efficiency).
2 Identifies different computer parts, turns the computer on/off, and work on a
2 1 given task with acceptable speed and accuracy and connects computer
Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on peripherals (e.g. printers, modems, multimedia projectors, etc.)
improving personal productivity to create higher value and results.
1 3 Prepares simple presentation using Powerpoint.
3
Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or
1 4
solutions.
Utilizes technologies to: access information to enhance professional
1 productivity, assists in conducting research and communicate through local and
4 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve global professional networks.
1
the work unit and organization.
5 5
Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates Recommends appropriate and updated technology to enhance productivity and
1 1
resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with minimal resources. professional practice.
OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 4.67
CORE SKILLS 5.00
OVERALL RATING 4.83
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishment of KRAs and Objectives 4.320 Very Satisfactory

Rater-Ratee Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on the contents of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee Name of Superior

MARI JEAN F. SEBASTIAN
TEACHER III MASTER TEACHER I
Signature Signature

Date Date
 PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Intervention) Timeline Resources Needed
Learning Objectives Intervention
A. Functional Competencies (RPMS-PPST Objectives from Part II of e-SAT)

B. Core Behavioral Competencies (from Part III of e-SAT)

Feedback

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority

MARI JEAN SEBASTIAN MARIA ANNA EVELYN S. CABANIERO

MASTER TEACHER I Teacher III Principal II