Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Research Article

Blood Purif Received: March 20, 2020


Accepted: June 28, 2020
DOI: 10.1159/000509788 Published online: August 31, 2020

Continuous Observation of Serum Total


Magnesium Level in Patients Undergoing
Hemodialysis
Wenfang Yang a Erli Wang b Wenxiu Chen a Chunming Chen a
       

Shanying Chen a  

aDepartment of Nephrology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China;
bClinical
Laboratory, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China

Keywords the initiation of hemodialysis, the levels of serum total mag-


Continuous observation · Hypermagnesemia · Initiating nesium increased. In patients on MHD, hypermagnesemia
hemodialysis · Magnesium · Maintenance hemodialysis was very common. Hypomagnesemia was rare when 0.5
mmol/L magnesium dialysate was used. We did not find pro-
ton pump inhibitor associated hypomagnesemia. Conclu-
Abstract sion: We find that serum total magnesium levels are in the
Background: Magnesium is an indispensable cation and normal range before initiating hemodialysis. However, in pa-
plays an important physiological role in the body. Most previ- tients on MHD, hypermagnesemia is common when 0.5
ous studies focused on the single measurement of serum mmol/L magnesium dialysate is used. Hypomagnesemia is
magnesium in patients undergoing hemodialysis. However, very rare. Hypomagnesemia in patients on MHD is an indica-
scant studies focused on continuous observations of serum tor of poor condition. © 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel
magnesium levels. Objective: To provide continuous obser-
vations of serum magnesium levels in patients on mainte-
nance hemodialysis (MHD). The levels of magnesium in pa-
tients initiating hemodialysis are also recorded and analyzed Introduction
in the present study. Methods: In this retrospective study, we
serially investigated the measurements of serum total mag- The patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) of-
nesium in MHD patients and patients initiating hemodialysis. ten have a series of metabolic disorders because of losing
Our data were followed up for one year. We provided real- the regulation function of normal kidney [1]. Although
time update on the levels of serum magnesium in patients on much attention has been focused on electrolytes includ-
hemodialysis. Results: On January 1, 2019, a total of 356 end- ing potassium, calcium, and phosphorus in dialysis pa-
stage renal disease patients were receiving hemodialysis in tients [2], magnesium has long been referred to as “the
our hospital. On December 31, 2019, the number had in- neglected cation” [1]. In fact, magnesium is an indispens-
creased to 383. We found that serum total magnesium levels able cation and plays an important physiological role in
were in the normal range before initiating hemodialysis. With the body [3]. Magnesium is a cofactor in more than 300
130.237.122.245 - 9/5/2020 6:23:08 PM
Karolinska Institutet, University Library

karger@karger.com © 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel Shanying Chen


www.karger.com/bpu Department of Nephrology
Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
59 # Shengli Xi Road, Zhangzhou 363000 (China)
Downloaded by:

1485744679 @ qq.com
enzymatic reactions [4]. About 99% of total body magne- The study period was from January 1, 2019, to December 31,
sium is stored in bones, skeletal muscles, and soft tissues 2019. In this study, weinvestigated the data of two groups: MHD
patients and patients initiating hemodialysis. Inclusion criteria for
[2, 3]. Extracellular magnesium only accounts for about MHD patients were as follows: (1) ESRD confirmed by nephrolo-
1% of total body magnesium [2, 3]. Magnesium homeo- gists; (2) receiving hemodialysis; and (3) undergoing dialysis ther-
stasis is maintained by the intestine, the bone, and the apy >90 days. Exclusion criteria were (1) age < 18 years and (2)
kidneys [2, 3]. The kidneys are crucial in magnesium ho- acute kidney injury (AKI).
meostasis [2, 3]. With the loss of kidney function, the Inclusion criteria for patients initiating hemodialysis were as
follows: (1) ESRD confirmed by nephrologists and (2) initiating
magnesium homeostasis may be out of balance [2]. hemodialysis from January 1, 2019, to October 31, 2019. Exclusion
Sakaguchi et al. [5] conducted a cohort study of 142,555 criteria were (1) age < 18 years; (2) AKI; (3) transfer to hemodialy-
hemodialysis patients. This is the first published study to sis after peritoneal dialysis therapy; and (4) patients who had re-
demonstrate the significant association between hypo- ceived hemodialysis in other medical institutions.
magnesemia and mortality in patients undergoing hemo- Some pharmacology therapies may affect magnesium metabo-
lism [9–12], so history of pharmacology therapies in 2019 was in-
dialysis [5]. Thereafter, several studies based on large vestigated. Pharmacology therapies which may affect magnesium
samples focus on the association between magnesium metabolism included proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) [9, 10], calci-
levels and mortality in dialysis patients [1, 6, 7]. Normal neurin inhibitors [11], diuretics [12], and magnesium-containing
serum total magnesium level ranges from 0.7 to 1.0 preparations. We reviewed medical records and imaging reports
mmol/L [1]. The previous study has indicated that an in- (chest CT or X-ray) to diagnose aortosclerosis and coronary calci-
fication. Echocardiography reports were reviewed to diagnose cal-
creased level of magnesium (2.8–3.1 mg/dL) is optimal cification of the aorta or mitral valve.
for hemodialysis patients [5]. However, the previous
large-scale studies focused on the single measurement of Laboratory Variables
serum magnesium and usually used baseline level of se- Predialysis samples were collected from the fistula needle,
rum magnesium as a predictor [6, 7]. Since the levels of avoiding heparin or saline infusion before samples were collected.
Postdialysis samples were collected before the end of hemodialysis.
electrolytes in the body often fluctuate, a single measure- To avoid the influence of hemodialysis vascular access recycling,
ment of electrolytes may be not a good indicator. the method of postdialysis sample collection was as follows [8]:
To the best of our knowledge, scant studies focused on (1) set the ultrafiltration speed to 0; (2) then set the dialysate as
continuous observations of serum magnesium levels in bypass; (3) maintain extracorporeal circulation for 3–5 min at nor-
patients undergoing hemodialysis. We performed this mal speed; and (4) extract blood samples from the extracorporeal
pipeline. Heparin or other anticoagulation was stopped for at least
retrospective study to provide continuous observations of 30 min before the end of dialysis. Fasting was not required prior to
serum magnesium levels in patients on maintenance he- the collection of blood samples.
modialysis (MHD). The levels of magnesium in patients The blood sample was centrifuged within 2 h, and the plasma
initiating dialysis were also recorded and analyzed in the was separated. The level of total serum magnesium was measured
present study. using the Arsenazo I method (Beckman AU 5800). According to
the recommendation of our laboratory, the normal level of serum
total magnesium ranged from 0.6 to 1.1 mmol/L. Hypomagnese-
mia and hypermagnesemia were defined as the level of total se-
Materials and Methods rum magnesium <0.6 mmol/L or >1.1 mmol/L, respectively. For
the patients initiating hemodialysis, the baseline serum magne-
Data Collection sium value was the last measurement of serum magnesium before
Our hospital had two hemodialysis centers. Information regis- receiving the first hemodialysis therapy. Based on the Japanese
tration and medical records have been established in hemodialysis large-scale study [5], a higher level of serum total magnesium
centers. Medical records included patient name, age, gender, pri- (2.8–3.1 mg/dL) was associated with the lowest mortality in he-
mary diseases, dialysis treatment information, history, pharmacol- modialysis patients. In the present study, the optimal level of
ogy therapies, and so on. Using out-patient clinical laboratory sys- magnesium was defined as 1.1–1.3 mmol/L (2.6–3.1 mg/dL). Se-
tem, we collected laboratory data on hemodialysis patients. Ac- vere hypermagnesemia was defined as the level of serum total
cording to Chinese Blood Purification Standard Operating magnesium ≥1.3 mmol/L. Persistence of severe hypermagnese-
Procedure (SOP) 2010 [8], it is recommended to examine labora- mia  was defined as serum total magnesium ≥1.3 mmol/L at least
tory variables including electrolytes, serum creatinine, and blood two consecutive months. Recurrence of severe hypermagnesemia 
urea every 1–3 months in patients on hemodialysis. In our hemo- was defined if the level of serum total magnesium increased to 1.3
dialysis centers, we had a monthly measurement of the level of mmol/L after decreasing below 1.3 mmol/L from severe hyper-
electrolytes, serum creatinine, and blood urea. We also measured magnesemia . According to the reference provided by the labora-
postdialysis blood urea every three months. We also recommend- tory, the normal level of plasma albumin was 35–55 g/L, so hy-
ed to re-examine postdialysis electrolytes according to conditions. poalbuminemia was defined if the level of plasma albumin was
The residual urine volume was calculated as the average of 24-h <35 g/L. The normal level of intact parathyroid hormone was
urine volume on a dialysis day and a non-dialysis day. 12–88 pg/mL.
130.237.122.245 - 9/5/2020 6:23:08 PM
Karolinska Institutet, University Library

2 Blood Purif Yang/Wang/Chen/Chen/Chen


DOI: 10.1159/000509788
Downloaded by:
Table 1. The level of serum total magnesium in MHD patients

N Mean ± SD, Magnesium <0.6 mmol/L 1.1–1.3 mmol/L ≥1.3 mmol/L


mmol/L range, mmol/L (%) (%) (%)

1 246 1.13±0.15 0.67–1.68 0 119 (48.37) 30 (12.20)


2 265 1.13±0.17 0.63–1.69 0 122 (46.03) 37 (13.96)
3 229 1.16±0.15 0.59–1.80 1 (0.44) 105 (45.85) 22 (9.60)
4 214 1.13±0.15 0.61–1.83 0 95 (44.39) 24 (11.21)
5 233 1.20±0.17 0.66–1.95 0 113 (48.50) 58 (24.89)
6 249 1.13±0.16 0.52–1.66 2 (0.80) 111 (44.58) 33 (13.25)
7 270 1.13±0.18 0.13–1.67 2 (0.74) 126 (46.67) 37 (13.70)
8 268 1.12±0.15 0.70–1.94 0 120 (44.78) 26 (9.70)
9 231 1.16±0.15 0.64–1.82 0 105 (45.45) 40 (17.32)
10 294 1.17±0.16 0.72–1.66 0 141 (47.96) 55 (18.71)
11 227 1.15±0.15 0.71–1.58 0 121 (53.30) 35 (15.42)
12 255 1.12±0.16 0.60–1.59 0 105 (41.17) 28 (10.98)

MHD, maintenance hemodialysis.

Data Analysis
We used Excel to complete data input and collection. Stata sta-
2019, the number had increased to 383. The total number
tistical software (version 12.0) was used to perform data analysis. of ESRD patients receiving hemodialysis in our hospital
The levels of serum total magnesium in patients undergoing MHD is listed in Appendix 1 by month. On December 31, 2019,
were calculated monthly. The prevalence of hypomagnesemia, hy- a total of 371 patients were undergoing MHD (dialysis
permagnesemia, and severe hypermagnesemia was calculated >90 days) treatment in our hospital. In the following data,
monthly. We also calculated the ratio of the optimal level of serum
total magnesium. The multiple linear regression model was used the data of two patients <18 years were excluded. Age
for test factors associated with the level of serum total magnesium. ranged from 21 to 89 years with a mean of 51 years. The
The model was adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, plasma albumin, ratio of male/female was 211/158. The most common pri-
blood urea, the level of serum potassium, hemoglobin, total calci- mary disease was glomerulonephritis (36.86%), followed
um, phosphorus, and parathyroid hormone [5–7]. Because hemo- by diabetic nephropathy (26.02%). Other primary diseas-
dialysis twice a week was not a conventional hemodialysis therapy,
the therapy may lead to a different magnesium balance. In the re- es include hypertensive nephropathy, polycystic kidney
gression models, the cases receiving hemodialysis twice a week disease, lupus nephritis, purpura nephritis, ANCA-asso-
were excluded. Before data analysis, we made a logarithmic trans- ciated vasculitis, and obstructive nephropathy.
formation and deal the variables with skew distribution.
In the patients initiating hemodialysis between January 1, 2019, Other Clinical Information and Therapies
and October 31, 2019, the baseline magnesium measurements and
serum total magnesium measurements in three consecutive The median of residual urine volume in December
months after initiating dialysis were collected. The paired t test was 2019 was 0 mL/24 h (25%: 0, 75%: 250 mL/24 h). The per-
used for comparing predialysis and postdialysis serum total mag- centage of vascular access of adult patients receiving
nesium. MHD in our hospital was as follows: autogenous arterio-
venous fistula (92.95%), graft arteriovenous fistula
(3.25%), and cuffed hemodialysis catheter (3.79%). About
Results 96% patients received hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration
three times a week. Other patients received treatment
Basic Information about the Patients Undergoing twice a week. The target value of on-line monitoring Kt/V
Hemodialysis was 1.2–1.4. Physicians and nurses adjusted treatment in
A total of 464 ESRD patients had received hemodialy- time to ensure treatment compliance. Bicarbonate dialy-
sis in our hospital. Age ranged from 12 to 99 years with a sate (from Kangcheng Healthcare, Guangzhou, China;
mean of 53 years. The ratio of male/female was 277/187. Mg2+ 0.50 mmol/L, Ca2+ 1.50 mmol/L) was used in our
The average of body mass index was 21.29 ± 3.60 kg/m2. hospital.
On January 1, 2019, a total of 356 ESRD patients were Major pharmacology therapies of 462 HD patients >18
receiving hemodialysis in our hospital. On December 31, years are listed in Appendix 2. Among 239 patients having
130.237.122.245 - 9/5/2020 6:23:08 PM
Karolinska Institutet, University Library

Magnesium in Hemodialysis Blood Purif 3


DOI: 10.1159/000509788
Downloaded by:
used PPIs, 134 patients were prescribed 1–4 times (3–14 Table 2. The level of serum total magnesium in patients initiating
days for one prescription). Thirty-four patients had re- hemodialysis
ceived magnesium-containing preparations; however, 50%
N Mean ± SD, Magnesium range,
of the patients took them for a short time (only 1 prescrip- mmol/L mmol/L
tion). In 2019, 256 patients received chest CT or chest X-ray
examination. Thirty-two patients had aortosclerosis or cor- Initiation 72 0.88±0.19 0.53–1.24
onary arteriosclerosis. Among 184 patients who received 1st month 48 1.03±0.13 0.77–1.29
echocardiography, calcification of the aorta or mitral valve 2nd month 49 1.08±0.12 0.85–1.43
3rd month 46 1.10±0.15 0.52–1.34
was observed in 60 patients. In December 2019, 242 of 369
MHD patients received serum albumin tests. Among these
242 cases, 100 cases (41.32%) had a serum albumin level of
>40 g/L, and 22 cases had hypoalbuminemia (9.09%).
Table 3. Predialysis and postdialysis serum total magnesium in
patients with severe hypermagnesemia
The Level of Serum Total Magnesium in MHD
Patients (Table 1) Predialysis Postdialysis p value
In every month, 57–77% cases undergoing MHD re- serum total serum total
ceived measurements of predialysis serum total magne- magnesium, magnesium,
sium. The means of serum total magnesium were 1.12– mmol/L mmol/L
1.20 mmol/L, which were higher than the normal level. In February (N = 33) 1.40±0.09 1.07±0.13 <0.001
the monthly evaluation, 41.17–53.3% of MHD patients May (N = 51) 1.41±0.12 1.11±0.10 <0.001
receiving measurement had the optimal level of serum August (N = 21) 1.41±0.14 1.06±0.14 <0.001
magnesium. However, 9.6–24.89% of MHD patients had November (N = 18) 1.40±0.07 1.12±0.08 <0.001
severe hypermagnesemia. In contrast, hypomagnesemia
was very rare. Only 4 patients suffered from hypomagne-
semia during the study period. The factors associated
with serum total magnesium in multivariate regression hypomagnesemia. One patient had metastatic bladder
analyses are listed in Appendix 3. cancer with recurrent bleeding and poor appetite. An-
other patient was converted from peritoneal dialysis to
The Level of Serum Total Magnesium in Patients hemodialysis. Recurrent abdominal pain led to poor ap-
Initiating Hemodialysis (Table 2) petite. The other two patients were complicated with hep-
From January 1 to October 31, 2019, 98 patients initiated atitis B. One had taken adefovir and tacrolimus for long
hemodialysis therapy in our hospital. Patients who had re- term before initiating hemodialysis. One patient had cir-
ceived hemodialysis in other medical institutions or perito- rhosis. No patients were taking PPIs or diuretics.
neal dialysis were excluded. Data of 72 patients initiating Hypermagnesemia was common in MHD patients.
hemodialysis were included in the present study. The mean Even severe hypermagnesemia was not seldom. Overall,
age was 55.60 ± 14.4 years, with 43 male and 29 female pa- 94 patients experienced severe hypermagnesemia any-
tients. The levels of serum total magnesium in baseline, the time in 2019. During follow-up, 28 patients and 66 pa-
first month, the second month, and the third month are tients had recurrence of severe hypermagnesemia and
listed in Table 2. Compared with the baseline level of serum persistence of severe hypermagnesemia, respectively.
magnesium, the level of serum magnesium increased sig- Among these patients, seven patients had taken medi-
nificantly after receiving hemodialysis (p < 0.05). Before ini- cines containing magnesium. The results of statistical
tiating hemodialysis, the mean value of plasma albumin was analysis indicated significant remission of severe hyper-
29.3 g/L, and the mean value of plasma albumin in the first magnesemia after hemodialysis treatment (Table 3).
month, the second month, and the third month was 32.4 Reviewing medical records, we did not find severe
g/L, 38.8 g/L, and 34.3 g/L, respectively. clinical manifestations associated with magnesium me-
tabolism disorders, including severe arrhythmia, convul-
Hypomagnesemia and Hypermagnesemia in MHD sion, epilepsy, or delirium [1–4]. However, nausea, vom-
Patients iting, anorexia, and asthenia are common symptoms of
In MHD patients, hypomagnesemia was very rare. In uremia [8], and it was difficult to define whether they
the present study, only four patients were diagnosed as were caused by magnesium metabolism disorders.
130.237.122.245 - 9/5/2020 6:23:08 PM
Karolinska Institutet, University Library

4 Blood Purif Yang/Wang/Chen/Chen/Chen


DOI: 10.1159/000509788
Downloaded by:
Discussion sium level data were available, only 20.18% (28,764) pa-
tients had a relatively low serum magnesium level (<2.3
In the present study, we follow up the level of serum mg/dL). 19,071 (13.3%) patients had a higher level of se-
total magnesium in hemodialysis patients for one year. rum magnesium (>3.1 mg/dL) [5]. In the present study,
We find that serum total magnesium levels are in the nor- the results also indicated that the patients with MHD had
mal range before initiating hemodialysis. With the under- a relatively high level of serum magnesium. The mean of
going of hemodialysis, the level of serum total magne- serum magnesium was 1.12–1.20 mmol/L. In the month-
sium increases. In patients on MHD, hypermagnesemia ly evaluation, 9.6–24.89% of MHD patients had severe
is very common. In the monthly evaluation, 41.17–53.3% hypermagnesemia (>1.3 mmol/L). The result is consis-
of MHD patients have optimal level of serum magnesium tent with the conclusion of previous studies that dialysis
(1.1–1.3 mmol/L). Even 9.6–24.89% of MHD patients patients often have higher serum magnesium levels than
had severe hypermagnesemia (>1.3 mmol/L). Hypomag- the general population [16, 17]. In the other two large
nesemia is rare when 0.5 mmol/L magnesium dialysate is studies performed in the United States, the baseline mag-
used. Hypomagnesemia in patients on MHD is an indica- nesium levels in patients initiating dialysis were available
tor of poor condition. In the present study, we did not [6, 7]. Of 9,359 patients on hemodialysis and 10,692 pa-
find PPI-associated hypomagnesemia. tients receiving peritoneal dialysis, the mean serum mag-
Magnesium homeostasis depends on intestinal up- nesium level of the cohort was 2.1 mg/dL (median 2.1 mg/
take, renal excretion, and storage in bones and skeletal dL [IQR, 1.8–2.3 mg/dL]) and 2.1 mg/dL (median 2.1 mg/
muscles [13]. The majority of magnesium is absorbed in dL [IQR, 1.9–2.3-mg/dL]), respectively [6, 7]. In the pres-
the small intestine by a passive paracellular mechanism ent study, the level of serum magnesium of 72 patients
[2, 3]. A minority of magnesium is transported via the initiating hemodialysis during the study period was ana-
transcellular transporters transient receptor potential lyzed. Before hemodialysis was initiated, the mean of se-
channel melastatin member (TRPM) 6 and TRPM7 [2, 3]. rum magnesium level was 0.88 ± 0.19 mmol/L. We do not
The kidneys regulate the reabsorption and excretion of find that ESRD patients who have not received dialysis
magnesium cation within a sizeable range [2, 3]. In 24 h, have a higher level of magnesium. In the latest report [19],
approximately 2,400 mg of magnesium is filtered by the serum magnesium, mortality, and disease progression in
glomeruli [2, 3]. About 95% of filtered magnesium is re- 10,568 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate
absorbed in the proximal tubule, the thick ascending limb between 15 and 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 were investigated. In
of the loop of Henle, and the distal convoluted tubule [2]. 9,049 patients, serum magnesium ranged from 1.7 to 2.6
Only 3–5% of filtered magnesium excreted in the urine mg/dL [19]. Only 205 patients had a higher level of mag-
[2, 3]. Hormones, including parathyroid hormone, play a nesium (>2.6 mg/dL) [19]. The results of the latest report
minor role in magnesium homeostasis [2, 3]. [19] and the present study indicate that chronic kidney
A variety of causes lead to magnesium deficiency and disease may not attribute to hypermagnesemia.
hypomagnesemia [14]. In a retrospective study [15], However, in the present study, with undergoing he-
overall frequency of hypomagnesemia was 20.1%. Hypo- modialysis, the level of magnesium increased, and the dif-
magnesemia can be a useful tool in predicting morbidity ference was statistically significant. How to explain an in-
and mortality [15], while hypomagnesemia is not com- crease of serum magnesium after undergoing hemodialy-
mon in patients undergoing dialysis [16, 17]. With the sis? Serum magnesium will be eliminated by hemodialysis,
progression of renal failure, residual renal function is in- only when 0.5 mmol/L or lower magnesium dialysate is
adequate to maintain magnesium homeostasis and hy- used [16]. Other factors may play an important role in
permagnesemia may occur [2, 13, 16]. In patients under- determining serum magnesium levels in dialysis patients
going dialysis, dialysate magnesium concentration is also [16]. It is estimated that daily requirement for magne-
a major determinant of magnesium balance [16]. The sium in adults is about 200–400 mg [20, 21]. Patients with
previous study based on a group of Chinese peritoneal ESRD were found to have a severe depression of intestinal
dialysis patients indicates that hypomagnesemia is rare magnesium absorption, presumably due to deficiency of
while using Mg2+ 0.56 mmol/L dialysate [18]. In the past 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol [22]. Active vitamin D can
several years, several large-scale studies have been per- increase intestinal magnesium absorption [22, 23]. After
formed focusing on the level of magnesium in dialysis initiating hemodialysis, the patient’s condition can be im-
patients [5–7]. In Sakaguchi et al.’s study [5], of 142,555 proved. We speculate that the intake of magnesium and
hemodialysis patients for whom baseline serum magne- intestinal magnesium absorption increase due to condi-
130.237.122.245 - 9/5/2020 6:23:08 PM
Karolinska Institutet, University Library

Magnesium in Hemodialysis Blood Purif 5


DOI: 10.1159/000509788
Downloaded by:
tion improvement and vitamin D supplementation. This A higher level of magnesium may improve the prog-
may be a potential explanation. In the present study, plas- nosis of patients on hemodialysis [5–7]. However, a Japa-
ma albumin levels increased after initiating hemodialysis. nese study also found the U-shape association between
The result supports our explanation. the serum magnesium level and mortality [5]. Both the
Another increasing concern is the concentration of Japanese study [5] and the present study find that severe
magnesium cation in dialysate [2, 23, 24]. During hemo- hypermagnesemia is not seldom in patients on hemodi-
dialysis therapy, rapid magnesium equilibration between alysis. In the present study, using 0.50 mmol/L magne-
dialysate and serum is achieved [2, 23]. The concentra- sium dialysate can decrease postdialysis serum magne-
tion of magnesium cation in dialysate is a major determi- sium in patients with severe hypermagnesemia, while se-
nant of serum magnesium levels for patients on hemodi- vere hypermagnesemia persists or recurs in these patients.
alysis [16, 23]. Different concentrations for magnesium Whether lower magnesium concentration dialysate
cation (0.375, 0.5, or 0.75 mmol/L) are available in clinical should be provided for the patients with severe hyperma-
practice [1, 2, 23, 24]. It is found that lower serum mag- gnesemia is unknown. Floege [23] proposed “Magnesium
nesium levels are associated with a higher mortality in Concentration in Dialysate: Is Higher Better?”. Our study
hemodialysis patients, including those with hypoalbu- cannot answer this question. On account of the high prev-
minemia [6]. Maintaining a higher level of serum magne- alence of hypermagnesemia in hemodialysis patients, the
sium may be beneficial to dialysis patients [5, 6]. In a sin- higher concentration of magnesium dialysate should be
gle-center, randomized, double-blinded, controlled clini- cautious.
cal trial [24], a total of 59 hemodialysis patients were A variety of medicines can affect magnesium balance
randomized to two groups: standard dialysate magne- [9–12]. Magnesium-containing preparations may lead to
sium group (0.5 mmol/L) and increased dialysate magne- an increase in serum magnesium levels. In the present
sium group (1.0 mmol/L). After 28-day therapy, increas- study, only seven patients with severe hypermagnesemia
ing dialysate magnesium decreased calcification propen- intermittently took magnesium-containing preparations.
sity in subjects undergoing MHD [24]. Increasing Taking magnesium-containing preparations is unlikely
dialysate magnesium is a simple and effective method to the major cause of severe hypermagnesemia. Previous
improve hypomagnesemia in hemodialysis patients [23]. studies have reported hypomagnesemia induced by PPIs
Whether further raising dialysate magnesium concentra- in the general population and dialysis patients [10]. How-
tion is benefit for hemodialysis patients needs to be fur- ever, in the present study, we did not report hypomagne-
ther demonstrated. Approximately 25% and 8% of serum semia induced by PPIs. In the latest survey, PPI prescrip-
total magnesium are bound to albumin and globulin, re- tion for hemodialysis patients in Japan was investigated
spectively [25]. Only non-protein-bound serum magne- by a questionnaire survey [26]. PPI prescription is often
sium is ultrafilterable in hemodialysis [2]. However, an long-term use in hemodialysis patients [26]. After eight
obvious drawback in the previous studies is that only se- weeks treatment for peptic ulcer or gastroesophageal re-
rum total magnesium is measured [5–7]. flux disease, 112 (60%) physicians prefer to continuously
Although the association of hypomagnesemia and prescribe PPIs [26]. In Alhosaini et al.’s study [27], use of
mortality has been demonstrated in patients on dialysis PPIs is associated with hypomagnesemia. In this previous
[5–7], causality cannot be determined in these observa- study, 22 patients took omeprazole (20–80 mg/day), and
tional studies. The previous study indicates that the as- 7 patients were treated with pantoprazole (40–80 mg/
sociation between mortality and the level of serum mag- day) [27]. Duration of PPI use ranged from one to nine
nesium is attenuated after adjusted for albumin [6]. The years [27]. In the present study, although PPI use was
decreased level of serum magnesium may indicate mal- common, only 16 patients were prescribed >20 times (3–
nutrition [6]. However, we did not find the association 14 days for one prescription) in 2019. In our dialysis cen-
of the level of magnesium and albumin. In our study, the ter, we prescribe oral omeprazole (20–40 mg/day), esome-
prevalence of hypoalbuminemia is not high. A small prazole (20–40 mg/day), pantoprazole (20–40 mg/day),
sample size and the low incidence of malnutrition may or abeprazole (10–20 mg/day). Relatively short-term and
affect the results. In the present study, only four patients low-dose use of PPIs may explain that we did not find
had hypomagnesemia. Metastatic malignant tumor, cir- PPI-associated hypomagnesemia. One case with hypo-
rhosis, and poor appetite are the causes of hypomagne- magnesemia may be related to tacrolimus.
semia. Hypomagnesemia is an indicator of poor condi- The advantages and limitations of the present study are
tion. discussed here. Our data were followed up for one year. In
130.237.122.245 - 9/5/2020 6:23:08 PM
Karolinska Institutet, University Library

6 Blood Purif Yang/Wang/Chen/Chen/Chen


DOI: 10.1159/000509788
Downloaded by:
every month, 57–77% cases with MHD received measure- Statement of Ethics
ments of serum magnesium levels. Compared with previ-
The Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association
ous studies, the present study provides real-time update was strictly followed in the present study. The present study was
on the levels of serum magnesium in patients on hemodi- approved by the ethics committee of Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospi-
alysis. As we know, no similar research has been reported. tal of Fujian Medical University (ethics paper number:
The present study also included MHD patients and pa- 2020LWB019). The ethics committee of the hospital waived the
tients initiating hemodialysis. Serum total magnesium but need for written informed consent from the patients in this retro-
spective study. All personal information of the patients was confi-
not ionized magnesium is measured in the present study. dential.
It is a definite limitation of the present study and previous
studies [2, 5–7]. Some factors affecting magnesium are not
included in the present study. A single-center study can- Conflict of Interest Statement
not represent general patients. Scientific value of retro-
spective observational studies is limited. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Conclusion Funding Source

We find that serum total magnesium levels are in the The authors did not receive any funding.
normal range before initiating dialysis. However, in pa-
tients on MHD, hypermagnesemia is very common when
0.5 mmol/L magnesium dialysate is used. Hypomagnese- Author Contributions
mia is rare. Hypomagnesemia in patients on MHD may W.Y., E.W., W.C., C.C. collected the data. W.Y. drafted the ini-
be an indicator of poor condition. In the present study, tial manuscript. S.C. designed the study and reviewed and edited
we do not report PPI-associated hypomagnesemia. the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Appendix 1 Appendix 2

The Total Number of Hemodialysis Patients in 2019 by Month Major Pharmacology Therapy of Hemodialysis Patients

N N

1 Jan 2019 356 Antihypertensive drugs


31 Jan 2019 359 Calcium antagonist 358
28 Feb 2019 366 ACEI/ARB 31/129
31 Mar 2019 372 β-Blocker 195
30 Apr 2019 374 Clonidine 236
31 May 2019 370 α-Receptor blocker 151
30 Jun 2019 372 Calcitriol 157
31 Jul 2019 367 Calcium carbonate 174
31 Aug 2019 366 Sevelamer 145
30 Sep 2019 373 Proton pump inhibitors 239
31 Oct 2019 379 Magnesium-containing preparations 34
30 Nov 2019 378
31 Dec 2019 383 ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angio-
tensin receptor blocker.
130.237.122.245 - 9/5/2020 6:23:08 PM
Karolinska Institutet, University Library

Magnesium in Hemodialysis Blood Purif 7


DOI: 10.1159/000509788
Downloaded by:
Appendix 3

The Factors Associated with Serum Total Magnesium in


Multivariate Regression Analyses

Adjusted model coefficient p value

February data
Age −0.0007 (−0.003, 0.002) 0.51
Gender 0.02 (−0.04, 0.07) 0.55
Diabetes 0.007 (−0.06, 0.07) 0.84
Hemoglobin 0.0009 (−0.0009, 0.003) 0.34
Predialysis blood urea 0.0001 (−0.005, 0.005) 0.98
Predialysis serum total calcium 0.16 (0.03, 0.29) 0.02
Predialysis serum phosphorus 0.04 (−0.02, 0.10) 0.21
Predialysis serum potassium 0.02 (−0.02, 0.05) 0.31
Parathyroid hormone (log) 0.005 (−0.03, 0.03) 0.76
Plasma albumin 0.007 (−0.003, 0.02) 0.18
May data
Age −0.001 (−0.004, 0.001) 0.35
Gender 0.02 (−0.004, 0.08) 0.55
Diabetes −0.006 (−0.07, 0.06) 0.98
Hemoglobin 0.002 (−0.0004, 0.005) 0.09
Predialysis blood urea 0.005 (0.000, 0.01) 0.05
Predialysis serum total calcium 0.22 (0.06, 0.37) 0.007
Predialysis serum phosphorus 0.02 (−0.04, 0.08) 0.53
Predialysis serum potassium 0.05 (0.008, 0.08) 0.02
Parathyroid hormone (log) 0.005 (−0.03, 0.04) 0.78
Plasma albumin 0.009(−0.002, 0.02) 0.10
August data
Age −0.000 (−0.002, 0.002) 0.93
Gender 0.02 (−0.03, 0.07) 0.39
Diabetes −0.04 (−0.09, 0.02) 0.18
Hemoglobin 0.002 (0.0005, 0.004) 0.01
Predialysis blood urea 0.002 (−0.002, 0.006) 0.24
Predialysis serum total calcium 0.17(0.04, 0.30) 0.009
Predialysis serum phosphorus 0.04 (−0.01, 0.08) 0.14
Predialysis serum potassium 0.05 (0.002, 0.08) 0.001
Parathyroid hormone (log) 0.01 (−0.01, 0.04) 0.30
Plasma albumin 0.007 (−0.002, 0.03) 0.15
November data
Age −0.0001 (−0.002, 0.002) 0.91
Gender −0.02 (−0.03, 0.07) 0.49
Diabetes −0.03 (−0.08, 0.02) 0.25
Hemoglobin 0.002 (0.0004, 0.004) 0.02
Predialysis blood urea 0.003 (−0.001, 0.006) 0.18
Predialysis serum total calcium 0.16 (0.03, 0.29) 0.02
Predialysis serum phosphorus 0.03 (−0.01, 0.08) 0.13
Predialysis serum potassium 0.05 (−0.01, 0.08) <0.001
Parathyroid hormone (log) 0.008 (−0.02, 0.03) 0.52
Plasma albumin 0.005 (−0.004, 0.01) 0.26

Model: Adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hemoglobin, predialysis blood urea, predi-
alysis  serum total calcium, predialysis  serum phosphorus, predialysis serum potassium,
parathyroid hormone (log) and plasma albumin.
130.237.122.245 - 9/5/2020 6:23:08 PM
Karolinska Institutet, University Library

8 Blood Purif Yang/Wang/Chen/Chen/Chen


DOI: 10.1159/000509788
Downloaded by:
References
  1 Alhosaini M, Leehey DJ. Magnesium and di- 10 Perazella MA. Proton pump inhibitors and 20 Jones JE, Manalo R, Flink EB. Magnesium re-
alysis: the neglected cation. Am J Kidney Dis. hypomagnesemia: a rare but serious compli- quirements in adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 1967
2015 Sep;66(3):523–31. cation. Kidney Int. 2013 Apr;83(4):553–6. Jun;20(6):632–5.
  2 Misra PS, Nessim SJ. Clinical aspects of mag- 11 Nijenhuis T, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ. 21 Standing Committee on the Scientific Evalu-
nesium physiology in patients on dialysis. Se- Downregulation of Ca2+ and Mg2+ transport ation of Dietary Reference Intakes/Food Nu-
min Dial. 2017 Sep;30(5):438–45. proteins in the kidney explains tacrolimus trition Board/Institute of Medicine. Dietary
  3 Jahnen-Dechent W, Ketteler M. Magnesium (FK506)-induced hypercalciuria and hypo- reference intakes for calcium, phosphorus,
basics. Clin Kidney J. 2012 Feb; 5(Suppl 1): magnesemia. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Mar; magnesium, vitamin D, and fluoride. Wash-
i3–14. 15(3):549–57. ington: National Academies Press; 1997.
  4 Saris NE, Mervaala E, Karppanen H, Khawaja 12 Katopodis P, Karteris E, Katopodis KP. 22 Brannan PG, Vergne-Marini P, Pak CY, Hull
JA, Lewenstam A. Magnesium. An update on Pathophysiology of drug-induced hypomag- AR, Fordtran JS. Magnesium absorption in
physiological, clinical and analytical aspects. nesaemia. Drug Saf. 2020 May 12. the human small intestine. Results in normal
Clin Chim Acta. 2000 Apr;294(1–2):1–26. 13 van de Wal-Visscher ER, Kooman JP, van der subjects, patients with chronic renal disease,
 5 Sakaguchi Y, Fujii N, Shoji T, Hayashi T, Sande FM. Magnesium in chronic kidney dis- and patients with absorptive hypercalciuria. J
Rakugi H, Isaka Y. Hypomagnesemia is a sig- ease: should we care? Blood Purif. 2018;45(1– Clin Invest. 1976 Jun;57(6):1412–8.
nificant predictor of cardiovascular and non- 3):173–8. 23 Floege J. Magnesium concentration in dialy-
cardiovascular mortality in patients undergo- 14 Agus ZS. Mechanisms and causes of hypo- sate: is higher better? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.
ing hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2014 Jan;85(1): magnesemia. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):1309–10.
174–81. 2016 Jul;25(4):301–7. 24 Bressendorff I, Hansen D, Schou M, Pasch A,
  6 Li L, Streja E, Rhee CM, Mehrotra R, Soohoo 15 Wolf F, Hilewitz A. Hypomagnesaemia in pa- Brandi L. The effect of increasing dialysate
M, Brunelli SM, et al. Hypomagnesemia and tients hospitalised in internal medicine is as- magnesium on serum calcification propensity
mortality in incident hemodialysis patients. sociated with increased mortality. Int J Clin in subjects with end stage kidney disease: a
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Dec;66(6):1047–55. Pract. 2014 Jan;68(1):111–6. randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin J
  7 Yang X, Soohoo M, Streja E, Rivara MB, Obi 16 Cunningham J, Rodríguez M, Messa P. Mag- Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):1373–80.
Y, Adams SV, et al. Serum magnesium levels nesium in chronic kidney disease stages 3 and 25 Elin RJ. Magnesium metabolism in health and
and hospitalization and mortality in incident 4 and in dialysis patients. Clin Kidney J. 2012 disease. Dis Mon. 1988 Apr;34(4):161–218.
peritoneal dialysis patients: a cohort study. Feb;5(Suppl 1):i39–51. 26 Kawarazaki H, Nakashima A, Furusho M,
Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Oct;68(4):619–27. 17 Saha H, Harmoinen A, Pietilä K, Mörsky P, Nakata T, Nakata T. A questionnaire on pre-
 8 Blood purification standard operating proce- Pasternack A. Measurement of serum ionized scription patterns of proton pump inhibitors
dure (SOP) 2010. Available from: https://wenku. versus total levels of magnesium and calcium for hemodialysis patients in Japan. Clin Exp
baidu.com/view/83087ce9e009581b6bd9eb57. in hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol. 1996 Nephrol. 2020;24(6):565–72.
html. Nov;46(5):326–31. 27 Alhosaini M, Walter JS, Singh S, Dieter RS,
  9 Epstein M, McGrath S, Law F. Proton-pump 18 Li G, Zhang L, Ren H, Huang B, Mao C, Zhou Hsieh A, Leehey DJ. Hypomagnesemia in he-
inhibitors and hypomagnesemic hypopara- A. Clearance of magnesium in peritoneal di- modialysis patients: role of proton pump in-
thyroidism. N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct; 355(17): alysis patients: a single-center study. Blood hibitors. Am J Nephrol. 2014 Feb; 39(3): 204–
1834–6. Purif. 2019;47(Suppl 1):1–7. 9.
19 Azem R, Daou R, Bassil E, Anvari EM,
Taliercio JJ, Arrigain S. et al. Correction to:
serum magnesium, mortality and disease pro-
gression in chronic kidney disease. BMC
Nephrol. 2020 Apr 17;21(1):139.

130.237.122.245 - 9/5/2020 6:23:08 PM


Karolinska Institutet, University Library

Magnesium in Hemodialysis Blood Purif 9


DOI: 10.1159/000509788
Downloaded by:

You might also like