Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WAWMAR0386UBBS2CSIX
WAWMAR0386UBBS2CSIX
WAWMAR0386UBBS2CSIX
Executive summary
This study has been based upon the Swedish furniture manufacturing company, IKEA which
failed to set up its business in the US market. It has been found out that there are significant
cultural differences which are affecting the reliability of the company in the US market. Analysis
has been made with the help of the Hofstede model of cultural dimensions and found out that the
major differences lie within the components, masculinity and long term orientation.
Cultural theory of Hofstede has been discussed in the report. The theory is based on six
dimensions that have been discussed. Organisational culture of IKEA has been explained as it
reflects the areas where the company can implement change to succeed in a market with different
cultural aspects. The unique culture of the company is creating problems in the host markets as
requirements of people are different in the different markets. Employees are being treated well in
the organisation. Employees are being provided with several benefits but the company does train
its employees according to the Swedish culture.
IKEA has witnessed major losses in its revenue from 2017-2019 due to struggling with various
issues regarding its intercultural communication. The company has faced challenges in various
dimensions of the Hofstede during their expansion in countries like Saudi Arabia or Japan. The
company will have to strategize their expansion by considering the model of intercultural
competence.
Table of Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 4
Findings....................................................................................................................................... 4
Organisational culture of IKEA.....................................................................................................6
Conflicting values, beliefs, and behaviours..................................................................................8
Impact of cultural difference in the performance of IKEA in the US market..................................9
A model of intercultural competence..........................................................................................11
Conclusion................................................................................................................................. 13
Reference List........................................................................................................................... 15
Introduction
Globalisation has provided immense opportunities for business organisations to expand their
businesses in international markets. Understanding of culture is essential for business
organisations for avoiding hassles in the expanding country. Culture of every country is different
from one another. In order to succeed and survive in the different markets it is important for
business organisations to understand the cross-cultural aspects (Boussebaa, 2020). Cross-cultural
competence refers to the ability to effectively interact, understand, and communicate with other
individuals across cultures. Working in an internationally expanding country can be tricky as the
market is totally different. Choices, preferences, and culture are different to which business
organisations are not familiar (Tietze, 2021). Culture is an important element when operating in
an international market. The companies have to change their strategies according to the culture to
survive and succeed. Before entering into a market the business organisations have to examine
the market. Examining the cultural value, behaviour, and beliefs holds importance for
understanding the market. Often successful companies fail to understand the cultural adaptation
concept. As stated by Dudin et al., (2019), businesses fail as they consider that contemplating
cultural value is just what they need to follow and do not emphasise on the other aspects for
capturing the market. When business organisations fail to understand the culture of the ghost
country then they fail in the market.
In this report, theory related to corporate culture will be discussed along with the organisational
culture of IKEA. in this report the cross cultural mistake made by IKEA in the US market will be
presented. Being a successful company how IKEA failed in the US market due to cross-cultural
aspects will be showcased in the report. An intercultural competence model will also be
highlighted. Along with these, suitable recommendations for IKEA will be provided on the
cross-cultural aspect.
Findings
Theory related to corporate culture
Hofstede’s cultural dimension theory was introduced in 1980 by Geert Hofstede. The theory
explains the cultural difference across the countries. It also explains the ways businesses should
be done across different cultures. Six categories are involved in the Hofstede theory such as
power distance index, collective vs individualism, uncertainty avoidance index, femininity vs
masculinity, short-term vs long-term orientation, and restraint vs indulgence.
Figure 1: Comparison of Sweden and United States with six cultural dimension model of
Hofstede
(Source: hofstede-insights.com, 2021)
According to the differences that can be seen on the basis of the comparison made by the
Hofstede model of six cultural dimensions, there are significant differences that can be seen
between these countries. Eventually it led to significant challenges that IKEA faced while they
operated in the US market. One of the major differences can be seen in the aspect of Masculinity
vs Femininity (Beugelsdijk and Welzel, 2018). It can be seen that Sweden has a low score under
this dimension which depicts that the society prevailing within the nation is feminine in nature
while the US provides more of a masculine culture. Based on this fact, it can be considered that
the workforce would have to face partiality, especially the women segment at the workplace.
In the aspect of long term orientation, it can be seen that the score of Sweden has been
significantly high compared to that of the US. Therefore, it portrays a clear picture that the home
country of IKEA supports more of a modernistic approach for dealing with the changes rather
than considering the past experiences in order to make necessary improvements (Huang and
Crotts, 2019). On the other hand, in the US, it is practiced to consider both the past experiences
as well as the upcoming challenges that can be emerging in the market. Hence, it creates an urge
for the Swedish furniture manufacturing company to adopt such culture and operate in the US
market so that it can be able to synchronise with the corporate culture existing in the concerned
region. Apart from these two dimensions, there is no such difference regarding the scores
obtained by these two companies (Kristjánsdóttir et al. 2017). Therefore, these are the factors
that can be taken into consideration by IKEA which are responsible for affecting its
performance, stability and operability in the US market.
The revenue of IKEA in North America has seen significant fluctuations from 2017 to 2019 in
North America, and the cultural differences were one of the main factors causing these
fluctuations. The overall revenue went up from 5.86 to 6.05 billion US dollars. Still, it again
came down to 5.3 billion US dollars in 2019 since the company was coming up with various
issues related to cultural differences. Even though the founders of IKEA were always able to
recognize the multiple changes in society and accordingly adapt the company window changes,
recent years have witnessed the company be lagging in that aspect (Process Model of
Intercultural Competence, 2021). IKEA also underestimated the differences between the
corporate culture of Sweden and America since both countries are significantly different in terms
of individualism, power distance, and masculinity. The decision-making process is different in
both countries. American employees are primarily dependent on their managers regarding the
decision making while in Sweden, they adopt a consensus-based decision-making model. Also,
the American culture is more masculine, as stated by Hofstede, in contrast to Sweden, where the
culture is rather feminine, which explains the reason behind IKEA's focus on caring for everyone
within the office environment (diversities, 2021). Another reason for IKEA's failure in the US is
that the company is collectivistic and an individualistic approach. Still, the collectivistic
approach does not align with the work culture of the US. This was another primary reason for its
revenue going down in 2019. The company also was unaware of the differences among the
customers of Sweden and America, and the various culturally specific requirements for the home
furnishings are different in the US and European markets (Roy, 2020). Due to this, the company
will have to consider the consumer's taste and accordingly adjust the floor plans and furniture for
the American market, which will help them take their revenues higher. This has led to the
company struggling with failure in their expansion strategy in various countries such as Japan,
where the organization was devoid of the cultural knowledge of Japan and needed the
expectations of the local people (Ikea 's Failure Of Japan - 1354 Words | Bartleby, 2021). The
country's customers were habituated to higher levels of customer service and were not familiar
with the DIY concept of assembling the products.