Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Degree Project
Degree Project
At
SRIKALAHASTHI PIPES LTD., SRIKALAHASTHI
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted to
CHANDHINI KONGARA
(Reg . No: 0518036016)
DECLARATION
(KONGARA.CHANDHINI)
Reg no.0518036016
Place: Tirupati
Date:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
CONTENTS:
CHAPTER
TITLE PAGE NO.
NO.
1. INTRODUCTION 6-9
5.1 Findings
5.2 Suggestions
5.3 Conclusion
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION
INDUSTRY PROFILE
COMPANY PROFILE
INTRODUCTION
DEFINITIONS:
FORMAL DEFINITION:
Performance appraisal is the systematic evaluation of the individual with
respect to his or her performance on the job and his or her potential for
development.
MEANING:
Performance appraisal is method of evaluation the behaviour of
employees in the work spot, normally including both the qualitative aspects of
job performance. Performance here refers to the degree of accomplishment of
the tasks that makeup an individual’s job. Performance is always measured in
terms of results.
INDUSTRY PROFILE
WHAT IS CEMENT?
CURRENT SCENARIO:
Future Trends:
• The cement industry is expected to grow steadily in 2009-
10 and increase capacity by another 50 million tons in
spite of the recession and decrease in demand from the
housing sector.
• The industry expects project the sector to grow by 9 to 10
% for the current financial year provided India’s GDP
grows at 7 %
• India rank second in cement production after china.
• The major players have all made investment to increase
the production capacity in the past few months, heralding
a positive outlook for the industry.
• The major players have all made investment to increase
the production capacity in the past few months heralding
a positive outlook for the industry.
• Clinker Cement
• Ordinary Portland Cement
• Portland Blast furnace slag Cement
• Portland Pozzolana Cement
• Rapid hardening Portland Cement
• Oil well Cement
• White Cement
• Sulphate Resisting Portland Cement
• Fly ash
• Volcanic ash
• Silica fumes
• Calcined clay
• Limestone
• Iron Ore
• Coke
• Iron Scrap
• JK Cement
• Grasim Industries and Ultra Tech
• ACC
• India Cement
• Gujarat Abuja Cement Ltd.
• South Africa
• UAE
• Sri Lanka
• Nepal
• Bangladesh
• Australia
STRATEGIES:
PROBLEMS:
COMPANY PROFILE
LANCATION:
This group company was established in the year 1993 and has
executed most demanding and difficult projects in the field of civil
construction engineering on schedule essaying repute as a world-
class construction company in a very short time span. The company
is mainly executing prestigious work in the field of irritation ,
pipeline projects highways, housing and industrial construction
project an successfully compared several housing complexes roads,
irrigation canals, bridges and industrial complexes at Lanco diverse
dimensions of growth is achieved through conversion rays of vision
rays of vision creating dimensions.
Highlights
Cement Division
The slag from pig-iron plant is used for producing 90,000 TPA
cement, reflecting an approach that transforms the by-product into
productive inputs ,in value added finish product.
VISION:
MISSION:
DEDICATION:
IMPORTANT CUSTMOERS
SHARE CAPTITAL
FUTURE PROSPECTS
CHAPTER – 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT:
-Edward Flipplo
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
-Heyel
-Randall.S.Schuller
THEORITCAL BACKGROUND
WHOSE PERFORMANCE SHOULD BE APPRAISE?
To the question as to whose performance should be rated the answer
is obvious – employees. When we say employees, is it individuals or teams.
Specifically appraised rate may be defined as individual, work group, division
or organization.
a) Supervisors
b) Peer
c) Sub-ordinates
d) Self- Appraisal
e) Users of Service Customers
f) Consultants
WHEN TO APPRAISE:
Informal appraisal are conducted whenever if supervisor or personnel
manager feel it necessary. However systematic appraisal are conducted on a
regular basis every 6 months or annually. The performance of trainees and
probationers should be evaluated at the end of respective programmers.
CHAPTER-2
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
NEED FOR THE STUDY
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
SCOPE OF DATA
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
NEED FOR THE STUDY:
Performance review, therefore, tires to address all the above aspects, and in
the process ensures organisational effectiveness. However, while we review
the performance, it is important to agree on the key performance, it is
important to agree on the key performance indicators, the nature…
LIMITATIONS
RESEARCH DESIGN
DESCRIPTIVE:
Research Instruments:
SOURCE OF DATA:
Primary Data:
The primary data was collected from employees through structural
questions and personal interviews with the employees who have attended the
training programmes
Secondary Data:
Secondary data include both quantitative and qualitative data, and
they can be used in both descriptive and explanatory research. The data you
use may be raw data, where there has been little if any processing. Or
compiled data that have received some form of selection or summarizing
within business and business and management research such data are used
mostly in case study and survey-type research.
The secondary data was collected from the previous training records
of LANCO INDUSTRIES LTD..
SAMPLING PLAN
There are two types of sampling method
Sampling Size :
This refers to the number of items to be selected from the universe to
constitute a sample. This is major problem before a researcher. The size of
sample should be 70 members. It should be optimum the size of population
must invariably between into consideration when we decide the sample size.
Sample method:
A convenience sampling method of 70 employees was taken to collect
the data pertaining to performance appraisal of LANCO INDUSTRIES…
CHAPTER-3
DATA ANALYSIS
&
INTERPRETATION
DATA ANALYSIS
Table 3.1 Awareness Towards Appraisal System
ASPECT Yes No
No. of Respondents 56 14
Percentage% 80 20
90
80
70
60
50
Yes
40 No
30
20
10
0
No. of Respondents Percentage
INFERENCE:
The question is posed to the appraises is the awareness towards the
appraisal system to know whether the appraise is having some Knowledge
towards the appraisal system or not.
From the about it is inferred that 80% of the respondents are aware of
appraisal system and rest of them or not aware about the appraisal system.
70
60
50
40
Yes
30 No
20
10
0
No. of Respondents Percentage
INFERENCE:
The question is posed to find out the information sharing by the appraiser.
Aspect Yes No
No. of Respondents 58 83
Percentage% 12 17
90
80
70
60
50
Yes
40 No
30
20
10
0
No. of Respondents Percentage%
INFERENCE:
The question is asked to find out if the system is clear to all the members
or not.
From the above it is inferred that the appraisal system is transparent for
83% of the appraisal and for remaining the system is not transparent.
50
45
40
35
30
25 No. of Respondents
Percentage%
20
15
10
0
To Large extent To Small extent To less extent
INFERENCE:
From the above it is inferred that 4.3% of the appraise are satisfied with
regarding transparency of the Appraisal system up to small extent and large
extent up to 2.7% and to low extent up to 30%
Aspects Yes No
No. of Respondents 59 11
Percentage% 84 16
90
80
70
60
50
Yes
40 No
30
20
10
0
No. of Respondents Percentage%
INFERENCE:
45
40
35
30
25
No. of Respondents
20 Percentage
15
10
0
To Large Extent To Small Extent To Less Extent
INTERENCE:
From the above it is inferred that fulfilment of training needs for appraise
are 25.7% up to large extent, 40% up to small extent and 34.3% up to low
extent and rest of them are not.
60
50
40
30 No. of Respondents
Series 2
20
10
0
To large Extent To Small Extent To Less Extent Not at all
INFERENCE:
Aspect Yes No
No. of Respondents 58 12
Percentage% 83 17
90
80
70
60
50
Yes
40 No
30
20
10
0
No. of Respondents Percentage
INFERENCE:
From the above it is inferred that for 83% of appraise the appraisal
system helps in improving performance and rest of them it not helpful in
improving performance.
Aspects Yes No
No. of Respondents 43 27
Percentage% 62 38
70
60
50
40
Yes
30 No
20
10
0
No. of Respondents Percentage%
INFERENCE:
70
60
50
40
No. of Respondents
30
Percentage%
20
10
0
Satisfied Dissatisfied Need to be Introduce new
change system
INFERENCE:
From the above it is inferred 62% of the appraisee are satisfied with the
current appraisal, 25% are needs to be change, 10% needs to introduce new
system and rest of them are dissatisfied.
Aspect Yes No
No. of Respondents 43 61.42
Percentage% 27 38.58
70
60
50
40
Yes
30 No
20
10
0
No. of Respondents Percentage%
INFERENCE:
From the above it is inferred that, for 61.42% of the appraiser’s the
appraisal system provides feedback to sub-ordinates and for the rest of them
the appraisal system not provides feedback to sub-ordinates.
90
80
70
60
50
Yes
40 No
30
20
10
0
No. of Respondents Percentage%
INFERENCE:
From the above it is inferred that, for 84.28% of the Appraiser’s the
present reward system is based on performance of the employee’s and for
rest of them the present reward system is not based on performance of the
employee’s.
Aspect Yes No
No. of Respondents 59 11
Percentage% 84.28 15.72
90
80
70
60
50
No. of Respondents
40 Percentage%
30
20
10
0
No. of Respondents Percentage
INFERENCE:
From the above it is inferred that, for 93% of the Appraiser’s the present
incentive system motivates the employee’s performance and for rest of them
the present incentive system motivates the employee’s performance.
Aspect Yes No
No. of Respondents 38 32
Percentage% 54.3 45.7
60
50
40
30 Yes
No
20
10
0
No. of Respondents Percentage%
INFERENCE:
From the above it is inferred that, for 54.28% of the appraiser’s there is
no need for alternative system of performance appraisal and for rest of
them there is need for alternative system of performance appraisal.
Aspect Yes No
No. of Respondents 46 24
Percentage% 65.72 34.28
70
60
50
40
Yes
30 No
20
10
0
No. of Respondents Percentage%
INFERENCE:
From the above it is inferred that, for 93% o Appraiser’s the current
appraisal system helps in improving superior-subordinate relationship and for
rest of them the current appraisal system not helps in improving superior-
subordinate relationship.
CHAPTER – 4
FINDINGS
SUGGESTIONS
CONCLUSION
FINDINGS
SUGGESTIONS
CONCLUSION
The Survey was under taken to study the workers attitude in the
organization totally called Performance Appraisal. The study focused on the
attitude of the workers. From the study we can conclude that some of the
workers are not fully satisfied with the financial resources and the reward
system.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
TEXT BOOKS:
WEBSITIES:
✓ www.lancogroup.com
✓ www.google.com