Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Deloitte NL Fsi Fintech Report 1
Deloitte NL Fsi Fintech Report 1
further disruption
December 2020 | Deloitte Financial Advisory Netherlands
Valuation & Modelling | Corporate Finance
Table of contents Why does this report
1. Introduction 2
matter
2. Fintech disruption 7
Board
3. Investment activity – global scene 12 It is important to establish a clear strategy to deal with Fintechs for companies
active within the financial sector. This report provides key factors and
considerations to consider when engaging in strategic partnerships or
4. European ecosystem 16 acquisitions.
5. Deloitte services 22
Fintechs
Fintechs have changed how financial services are structured, delivered and
consumed, but many have not successfully established themselves as dominant
players yet. The next challenges in their growth path are investigated in this
report.
Structure of the report
This is a five-part report. After providing an introduction on the total
Fintech market, the second part provides perspective on the changes that Financial institutions
Fintechs have brought to the financial services industry, including identified Cooperation between financial institutions and Fintechs encounters several
opportunities, interaction with incumbents and what is the promise ahead. hurdles. This report provides ideas for enabling better, more efficient cooperation
between incumbent Financial institutions and Fintech startups.
The third part gives an overview of Fintech global investment activity,
including breakdowns per deal type and regions, and an analysis of
potential COVID-19 effects on the industry.
The fourth part zooms in on the European Fintech ecosystem and
continues with an overview of the evolution of the Fintech landscape, most
Strategy & M&A
Deal activity within the Fintech space is constantly evolving. By tracing investment
important deals and deal activity of incumbents.
activity from a global level to the European ecosystem, this report assesses the
We conclude with an overview of specific M&A and valuation related geographies and segments that received the highest investments and potentially
challenges in executing Fintech deals. offer the highest growth potential.
01 Introduction
01 Introduction
PERSONAL FINANCE PAYMENTS & BILLING LENDING INSURTECH MONEY TRANSFER &
Tools to manage bills and track Payments processing, card Marketplace lending, Companies selling insurance REMITTANCES
personal and/or credit accounts developer & subscription billing microlending & alternative digitally providing data analytics
International money transfer and
software tools underwriting platforms and software for (re)insurers tracking software
The APAC and Americas command the highest market share of the global Fintech market,
with APAC being projected to be the fastest growing region
Global Fintech market Global Fintech revenue to grow by 11.7% (‘19 – ’24)
• Global Fintech revenues in 2018 were about €92 billion in 2018 and are Americas
188
expected to grow to more than €188 billion in 2024 (pre-COVID-19 forecast). EMEA
• The Fintech markets in the APAC and Americas regions are currently the largest, APAC 174
CAGR*
with both having around 40% of the global market share. The EMEA region is 11.7% 159
significantly smaller, with around 20% of the total market share. The Fintech 63
market in the APAC region is projected to be the fastest growing.
143
61
• The digital payments market is the largest segment within the Fintech spectrum
and accounts for more than 80% of global Fintech revenues. 126 58
• Although COVID-19 causes uncertainty in the Fintech market, it creates
108 55
opportunities for the Fintech market as well. The adaptability and innovation of 29
Fintechs makes the sector well positioned to realize their growth path. 49
92 28
80 42 26
35 24
29 23
21
20 96
19 85
74
64
54
45
32 38
Fintech share prices have relatively outperformed the traditional financial services
industry in the past two years, especially since COVID-19
The share prices between global Fintechs and traditional financial institutions have diverged since September 2018
• In the graph on the right, the 160
Index
STOXX Global Fintech Index
relative share price = 153
150 MCSI WRLD Financials Index
development of Fintechs and
the traditional financial services 140
industry is shown.
130
• The STOXX Global Fintech Index
includes Fintech companies like 120
Adyen, Visa and PayPal, whereas
the MSCI WRLD Financials Index 110
mainly consists of traditional
100 Index
financial institutions.
= 96
• Since September 2018, the 90
STOXX Global Fintech Index has
80
risen by c. 50%, while the MSCI
WRLD Financial Index fell by c. 70
4%.
60
• Fintech share prices recovered
within four months after COVID- 50
19 impacted capital markets, Sep 2018 Nov 2018 Jan 2019 Mar 2019 May 2019 Jul 2019 Sep 2019 Nov 2019 Jan 2020 Mar 2020 May 2020 Jul 2020 Sep 2020 Nov 2020
while traditional financial Share price development in Global Fintech vs. traditional financials (September 2018 index of 100). Data is displayed for the period 3 September 2018 - 14 December 2020
services industry prices have not Source: Capital IQ
yet fully recovered.
02 Fintech disruption
Fintechs have changed how financial services are structured, delivered and consumed,
but many have not successfully established themselves as dominant players yet
Fintechs have materially changed the basis of competition in financial services but have not (yet) materially disrupted the competitive
CONCLUSION
landscape.
Source: Deloitte, Beyond Fintech - A pragmatic assessment of disruptive potential in financial services
© 2020 Deloitte The Netherlands Fintech | On the brink of further disruption 8
FINTECH | FINTECH DISRUPTION
Although Fintechs have not yet disrupted the competitive landscape, they have laid the
foundation for further future disruption
Some financial institutions have turned the threat of Fintechs into an opportunity… Santander
Santander is one of the market leading
retail banks that leapt onto the
disruptive fintech wagon. Apart from
The rapid growth of the Fintech ecosystem their 100% online bank, Santander
The rise of Fintechs provides financial
allows firms to externalize parts of their Openbank, based in Madrid, the
institutions with a “supermarket” for
innovation function, as they wait and see which banking giant has also made significant
capabilities, allowing them to use acquisitions steps into cryptocurrency, through
new offerings gain traction before deploying their
and partnerships to rapidly deploy new offerings. OnePay FX, a blockchain-based
own solutions.
international system available for their
customers, used to send and receive
transfers between individuals in
different countries.
Where Fintechs have laid the foundation for further future disruption Adyen
Currently with a market cap of c.€50bn,
Adyen is a global payment company
The ability to shop the Fintech landscape for and one of the top European Fintechs.
The accelerating pace of the innovation cycle in
capabilities is not limited to incumbents; new Adyen’s all-in-one platform accepts
financial services means that an incumbent
entrants face significantly lower technological payments everywhere and offers a
financial institution's success is predicated on
barriers to entering financial services, with seamless experience for business and
business model agility and the ability to
potential long-term implications for the customers. Previously, the payments
rapidly deploy partnerships, neither of which industry had multiple incumbents and
competitive landscape. Fintechs that offer unique
are traditional core competencies of these intermediaries, which Adyen has
consumer convenience and marketplace entry
institutions. already disrupted, due to its
have paved the way for further future disruption.
transparency, ease of adaption and
marketplace agility to transform to new
and upcoming business models.
Source: Deloitte, Beyond Fintech - A pragmatic assessment of disruptive potential in financial services
© 2020 Deloitte The Netherlands Fintech | On the brink of further disruption 9
FINTECH | FINTECH DISRUPTION
Organizational speed bumps can Don’t mistake a clear view for a short distance Generic pitches and a lack of industry
undercut Fintech propensity for rapid • Fintechs have the freedom and innovative culture but lack the money and experience undermine startup
experimentation the industry knowledge. FIs have the money and knowledge but are bogged credibility
• Financial institutions (“FIs”) internal down by the organizational structure and its legacy systems. • FIs have become more demanding
decision-making processes and risk • The strengths and weaknesses of Fintechs and incumbents are clear and about their Fintech expectations.
management requirements can hinder should be complementary, but the chasm is not as easily to bridge as it • The focus has shifted from “cool”
the collaboration with Fintechs, that seems. generic ideas to practical solutions
generally use a fast-fail approach. addressing specific problems in a
• External factors as regulatory and particular financial services sector.
compliance considerations can also • FIs and investors prefer more certainty
delay the process, with a potential on their investment, leading to
cyber breach as a common deal investments in later funding rounds and
breaker. less new Fintech launches. COVID-19
may reinforce this tendency.
Five opportunities are identified in the Fintech industry that give an overview of what is
happening now with COVID-19, and what is the promise ahead
Capital invested increased in 2018 and 2019, fueled by market confidence in Fintechs. In
2020, the market anticipates the effects of COVID-19 which might have triggered a
(temporary) decrease in deal numbers
Global deal activity in Fintech: Capital invested (€bn) Median Capital Invested and Median Post-Valuation (€m)
VC PE M&A IPO Other Deal # Capital Invested Median Post-Money Valuation Median
19%
3,621 2.0
10 10
31% 10
3,227
9
2020 highlights the 15% 1.6
potential effects of
2,690 1.5
COVID-19, with a lower
deal size 1.4
2,292 84.6 83.9
23%
20% 73.9 1.1
67.1 66.2 33%
10% 26% 0.9
54%
30%
40% 8%
36% 30%
27%
27%
18% 46%
22% 21%
25% 5%
6% 3%
34% 10% 4%
19% 11% 8% 6%
8% 14% 5%
3%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Q3 1 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Q31
Source: Pitchbook, Financial Times. Deloitte analysis. Data per 30/9/2020. Note (1) Q3 data is per 30/9/2020. The derived data may include a time lag; hence some deals may be missing
© 2020 Deloitte The Netherlands Fintech | On the brink of further disruption 13
FINTECH | INVESTMENT ACTIVITY
There was a steady increase in the invested capital for Americas and EMEA throughout
the 2016-2019 period. In 2020, we observe a particular decline in Fintech deal activity in
the EMEA region
Americas EMEA APAC
Nearly 50% of the $3.9tn in global Total Capital Invested (€bn) Deal #
M&A recorded this year involved US
Despite COVID-19 Asia saw a
targets, enough to power 4th highest
high # of megadeals in Q1
global M&A activity Strong decline in Europe
2,229 2020, such as Hengfeng Bank
2,098 potentially caused by COVID-19
and Gojek, amounting to
1,788 €12.8bn and €2.7bn
1,433 1,500 1,520 1,696 1,666 respectively
1,159 1,223
1,302
80
1,026 898 985 1,166 896
65 898 768
47 50 749 59
42 39 45
25 29 43 490
22 22 384
8 10 19 25
11 16 13 12
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Q3 1 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Q31 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Q3
1
Although 2020 YTD experienced a decline in early-stage VC deals, this was more than
offset by late-stage VC deals which have kept the momentum
Venture Capital Invested by Deal Type2 (€bn) Venture Capital Invested by Global Region (%)
Angel Seed Early stage Late stage APAC EMEA Americas European venture capital deals saw
a steep decline in deals in Q1 2020,
potentially due to COVID-19
9.9
3% 1% 9.4
1%
8.8 3%
18% 5% 3%
8.2 9% 12%
7.7 1% 4% 18% 15% 14%
4% 22%
7.2 1%
4% 14%
1% 23% 14%
5% 6.5 44%
26% 1% 25%
5% 14%
41% 35% 60%
39%
39%
8%
79%
78%
78% 74%
69%
68% 60% 64%
2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2020 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 1 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2020 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 1
Source: Pitchbook, Deloitte analysis. Note (1) Q3 Data is per 30/9/2020. Note: (2) Deal types also include CVC (corporate venture capital) deals which are accounted for in the early-Stage and Late stage deals
© 2020 Deloitte The Netherlands Fintech | On the brink of further disruption 15
01 Introduction
04 European ecosystem
Ecosystem Outline explained European Fintech ecosystem (sum = 3,482) Country of origin
To have a better Companies whose 5.1% Distributed ledger technology
understanding of the current operations are similar
5.9% Cryptocurrencies
state of the European Fintech enough, are given the same
market, we have visualized the color, thus forming a 4.4% RegTech 6.4% Trading 27%
Fintech ecosystem with the ‘cluster’. The closer the 5.5% AI & analytics 4.7% Investment management
help of Deepview. In this part clusters are to each other, the
of the report we will zoom in more intertwined their 2.4% Financial Advisory 44%
on the European ecosystem business operations are. 3.1% Financial planning
and give an overview of its Sometimes these companies 5%
evolution and key insights. indicate similarities with other 8.9% Financial services software solutions 5%
companies in a different
2.5% Insurance brokerage 6%
This ‘ecosystem’ is created cluster, represented by a line, 6%
using text processing connecting the two. 8%
algorithms that employ The size of each cluster is
Natural Language Processing expressed as a % of the 4.2% Crowdfunding 8.9% Insurance UK
(“NLP”) and artificial companies in that cluster
6.1% General banking Germany
intelligence to map out the relative to the whole
overview of Fintechs in ecosystem. Spain
3.7% Prop Tech
Europe, based on company France
description of the incumbent This section will further
Switzerland
players in the market. explore additional qualities of 6.3% Alternative lending
the Fintech Ecosystem such as 3.6% Personal finance Netherlands
Visualized on the right is the the development of the 9.3% Payments
Other
present Fintech ecosystem ecosystem, maturity of the
in Europe. Each node clusters, etc.
represents a company. 9.1% Accounting & Invoicing
Sources: Deepview, Capital IQ, Crunchbase, Deloitte analysis. Data per 08-04-2020
© 2020 Deloitte The Netherlands Fintech | On the brink of further disruption 17
FINTECH | EUROPEAN ECOSYSTEM
The Fintech venture ecosystem grew fast in the last decade, but showed slower growth in
the last years
2013 2016 2020 YTD
Note: In the mapped ecosystem, 1,080 companies are founded before year-end 2013, 2,446 companies are founded before year-end 2016, and 3,482 companies are founded before 2020YTD
Source: Deepview, Pitchbook, Deloitte analysis. Data per 08-04-2020
© 2020 Deloitte The Netherlands Fintech | On the brink of further disruption 18
FINTECH | EUROPEAN ECOSYSTEM
A deep-dive into the European Fintech ecosystem allows us to trace investment activity
The largest European Fintech deals are generally in markets related to payments
technology and banking platforms
10
Provider of a mobile foreign exchange and money transferring
9 3 Jul 20 512 Later-Stage VC
application designed to help in global money transfer
8
Operator of a digital and algorithmically-driven insurance PE Growth/
4 Sep 20 422
6 1 syndicate platform Expansion
6
1
2 Developer of end-to-end billing service software Sep 20 252 IPO
7
Provider of online marketplace for peer-to-peer lending created Buyout/
7 Sep 20 150
4 to offer a mean of exchange between people LBO
3
Developer of a payment card designed to offer secure payment
8 Apr 20 147 M&A
services in a managed service proposition
Source: Pitchbook, Deloitte analysis. Data per 30/9/2020. Notes: (1) SmartFin capital is the main institutional shareholder, second to Hans A. Leybaert, current CEO of UnifiedPost
© 2020 Deloitte The Netherlands Fintech | On the brink of further disruption 20
FINTECH | EUROPEAN ECOSYSTEM
A deeper view into Corporate Venture Capitals of European financial institutions indicate
investment activity to be oriented towards Fintech
CVC of ING Group. The firm seeks to make minority investments in seed-stage, early-stage, and later-
25 6
stage companies
CVC of Santander Group. The firm seeks to make minority investments in seed-stage, early-stage, and
35 9
later-stage companies
CVC of the Allianz Group. The firm seeks to invest in digital growth companies that are part of the
23 13
ecosystems related to insurance
ABN AMRO Ventures (former ABN AMRO Digital Impact Fund) is the CVC of ABN AMRO Bank 17 11
BNP Paribas provides banking and financial services. The company continually seeks opportunities for 20 50
growth and to expand through organic growth opportunities and strategic acquisitions
Source: Pitchbook, Deloitte analysis. Data per 30/9/2020. Note: (1) These include investments since 2010
© 2020 Deloitte The Netherlands Fintech | On the brink of further disruption 21
01 Introduction
05 Deloitte services
Our services cover the complete venturing lifecycle and support corporates in creating
and capturing value in innovative ecosystems
Corporates
Corporates
Scale-ups
© 2020 Deloitte The Netherlands Fintech | On the brink of further disruption 23
FINTECH | DELOITTE SERVICES
We can support ventures in obtaining the right source of funding to match their funding
need
• Grants &
liquidity) Subsidies
• Business
The context is imperative to attract investment from The chosen funding option(s) should match We are funding agnostic and can support you
the right investor(s) your funding need with a wide range of services
Traditional valuation techniques can be modified to make them fit for Fintech/startup
valuations. Market multiples are often applied as the primary approach to value Fintechs
FINANCIAL METRICS
DERIVED ENTERPRISE VALUE BASED ON MARKET Multiples based on financial metrics, such as EBIT(DA)
MULTIPLES and revenue, may be difficult to apply in case Fintechs
In the market approach, the value of a business is are loss making or do not yet have a sustained revenue
derived from multiples of publicly traded companies base.
with similar activities and transactions of comparable
companies.
OPERATIONAL METRICS
TRADING MULTIPLES Multiples based on operational metrics, such as users
Trading multiples generally concern more mature and customer transactions, may be more suitable as
companies (beyond the IPO stage) that may be in a these concern important KPIs for Fintechs.
later development stage than the Fintech under Disadvantages concern data availability and consistent
consideration. Hence, these companies may not be measurement across peer companies.
truly comparable. Advantages are greater data
availability, such as observable enterprise values.
TRANSACTION MULTIPLES
X E N T E R P R I S E VA L U E
Transaction multiples in Fintech valuations may be
derived from recent funding rounds. Companies
involved in comparable transactions may be in a
similar stage as the Fintech concerned. Disadvantages FINANCIAL OR OPERATIONAL TARGET
are a lack of observable market data, such as Both current or future operational or financial targets
enterprise values. may be used in the valuation of Fintechs.
The discounted cash flow (DCF) approach can be used to provide insights in the future
development of Fintechs when positive forecasted free cash flows are unavailable
Startup Lifecycle
Secondary
Angels, 3Fs VCs, M&As, Strategic Offerings
DCF BACK-SOLVING OF DERIVED ENTERPRISE VALUE Alliances
BASED ON MARKET MULTIPLES Seed capital
For many Fintechs, the absence of positive free cash
flows in the forecast period makes the DCF Later-
Stage IPO
Early-
approach impractical. However, the enterprise value
Stage
obtained from the market approach can be used to
Failures of startups are
back-solve the revenue and EBITDA development that
likely to occur
corresponds to the value of the company.
Disclaimer Notice on behalf of S&P, its affiliates and their suppliers on information contained in this report:
Reproduction of any information, data or material, including ratings, from S&P, its affiliates and their suppliers, that is contained in this report (“Content”) in any form is prohibited except with
the prior written permission of the relevant party. Such party, its affiliates and suppliers (“Content Providers”) do not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness, timeliness or
availability of any Content and are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, or for the results obtained from the use of such Content. In no
event shall Content Providers be liable for any damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including lost income or lost profit and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the
Content. A reference to a particular investment or security, a rating or any observation concerning an investment that is part of the Content is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such
investment or security, does not address the suitability of an investment or security and should not be relied on as investment advice. Credit ratings are statements of opinions and are not
statements of fact.
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited ("DTTL"), its global network of member firms and their related entities. DTTL (also referred to as "Deloitte Global") and each
of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.nl/about to learn more.
Deloitte is a leading global provider of audit and assurance, consulting, financial advisory, risk advisory, tax and related services. Our network of member firms in more than 150 countries and
territories serves four out of five Fortune Global 500® companies. Learn how Deloitte’s approximately 286,000 people make an impact that matters at www.deloitte.nl.
This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms or their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte network”) is, by
means of this communication, rendering professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or your business, you should consult a
qualified professional adviser. No entity in the Deloitte network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this communication.