Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Daily News Simplified - DNS Notes
Daily News Simplified - DNS Notes
Daily News Simplified - DNS Notes
17 MAY 2021
Notes
SL. THE HINDU
TOPICS
NO. PAGE NO.
Context: The editorial highlights that India has rightly sought (along with South Africa) a temporary waiver
of provisions in the TRIPS Agreement to facilitate universal access to COVID-19 vaccines. But the Centre
has done nothing to bring vaccines and medicines under a statutory regime in India to allow for wider
availability and a diversity of options. In fact, the Centre’s submission to the Supreme Court that the
“exercise of statutory powers... under the Patents Act, 1970 can only prove to be counter-productive at
this stage”, is clearly contradictory to its international position for a temporary waiver in the TRIPS
Agreement. The Agreement allows exceptions to the rights of patent owners by grant of compulsory
licences. So, on this note let us understand about Compulsory Licenses and about its waiver under TRIPS
Agreement. According to Section 53 of Indian Patents Act, 1970, the term of patent shall be twenty years
from the date of filing of the application for the patent.
What does a patent grant?
• Patent grants exclusive right for an invention which may be of a product or a process for 20 years.
Patent is granted for –
ü inventions which is new,
ü involves an inventive step which did not exist before
ü Such thing has not existed before and
ü has industrial applications.
• When patent is granted on a particular invention, it means that no other person can either produce
or sell for commercial purpose those inventions in the market without the approval of the creator
of such invention.
• India grants legal protection to various inventions through Indian Patents Act, 1970.
• Thus, if patent is granted to a Company ABC for one its pharmaceutical product XYZ, then no other
company can produce the medicine XYZ without due permission from ABC for 20 years.
Compulsory Licenses under Indian Patent Act, 1970 (Section 84 & 92)
• Patents are granted to encourage inventions and to secure that the inventions are worked in India
on a commercial scale under Indian Patent Act, 1970.
• However, patents granted do not in any way prohibit Central Government in taking measures to
protect public health. Section 84 of Indian Patents Act, 1970 provides for “Compulsory Licencing.”
(CL)
In considering the application field under section for compulsory licensing, the Controller shall
take into account:
(i) the nature of the invention, the time which has elapsed since the sealing of the patent and the
measures already taken by the patentee or any licensee to make full use of the invention.
(ii) the ability of the applicant to work the invention to the public advantage.
Date: 17-May-21 DNS Notes - Revision
(iii) the capacity of the applicant to undertake the risk in providing capital and working the invention, if
the application were granted.
(iv) as to whether the applicant has made efforts to obtain a licence from the patentee on reasonable
terms and conditions and such efforts have not been successful within a reasonable period as the
Controller may deem fit.
Section 100 - Power of Central Government to use inventions for purposes of Government
• Allows the Centre to license specific companies to manufacture the vaccines.
Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement allows Compulsory
Licensing
• The TRIPS Agreement allows the use of compulsory licences. Compulsory licensing enables a
competent government authority to license the use of a patented invention to a third party or
government agency without the consent of the patent-holder.
Date: 17-May-21 DNS Notes - Revision
• Article 31 of the Agreement sets forth a number of conditions for the granting of compulsory
licences. These include:
v a case-by-case determination of compulsory licence applications,
v the need to demonstrate prior (unsuccessful) negotiations with the patent owner for a
voluntary licence and
v the payment of adequate remuneration to the patent holder.
• Where compulsory licences are granted to address a national emergency or other
circumstances of extreme urgency - certain requirements are waived in order to hasten the
process, such as that for the need to have had prior negotiations obtain a voluntary licence from
the patent holder.
• Although the Agreement refers to some of the possible grounds (such as emergency and
anticompetitive practices) for issuing compulsory licences, it leaves Members full freedom to
stipulate other grounds, such as those related to non-working of patents, public health or public
interest.
• The Doha Declaration states that each Member has the right to grant compulsory licences and
the freedom to determine the grounds upon which such licences are granted.
• The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) also allows for
compulsory licencing of drugs to produce generic version of life saving drugs required to meet
public health challenges.
• Thus CL effectively allows countries to overcome the restriction imposed by patent and make the
drugs available at lower price.
• Under CL, government can allow other countries to make, use, sell or import a product under
patent without the permission of the patent owner.
Steps which Central Government can take during national emergency or health crisis for
Compulsory Licence
• In India, the patent regime is governed by the Patents Act, 1970, Section 92 of which envisages the
grant of a compulsory license, in circumstances of national emergency and extreme urgency.
• Once a declaration of national emergency is made, and the relevant patents notified, any person
interested in manufacturing the drug can make an application to the Controller General of Patents
who can then issue a compulsory license.
• The patentee would be paid a reasonable royalty as fixed by the Controller General of Patents.
• Further, under Section 100 of the Patents Act, the Central Government can authorize certain
companies to use any patents for the “purpose of the government”.
• Indian companies can begin manufacturing the drugs while negotiating the royalties with the
patentees.
• If the Central Government or its authorized company is not able to reach an agreement with the
patentee, the High Court has to fix the reasonable royalty that is to be paid to the patentee.
• Another alternative is for the Central Government to acquire the patents under Section 102 from
the patentees.
• If the Central Government and the patentee is not able to reach a consensus on the price of the
patents, it is up to the High Court to fix the royalty.
• Additionally, under Section 66 of the Patents Act, the Central Government is also entitled to revoke
a patent in the public interest.
Date: 17-May-21 DNS Notes - Revision
• The utilization of these flexibilities has also been detailed in the Trade Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property Rights Agreement as well.
2. UPSC Current Affairs: It is getting from bad to worse for women workers Page 06
UPSC Syllabus: Mains GS paper 2 : Social Issues
Sub Theme: Women Employment | UPSC
Context:
The year 2020 marked the 25th anniversary the adoption of Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action for the
women empowerment across the world. The empowerment of women is multi-faceted in nature and includes higher
economic, socio-cultural and political rights for the women. In a nutshell, it requires coordinated set of policies that
lead to “Engendering of Development”.
However, the CoVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected women in comparison to men. On one hand, a
large number of women have lost their jobs and livelihoods, while on the other hand, the burden of household
responsibilities has increased.
In this regard, Centre for Sustainable Employment, Azim Premji University has published a report titled ‘State of
Working India 2021: One Year of Covid-19” to analyse impact of CoVID-19 on the women employment. The facts
and figures published in the report are not important from the perspective of the UPSC Exam. But, from the
perspective of UPSC exam, the following dimensions would be important:
• Status of Women's Participation in Work force
• Trends in Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR)
• Reasons for decline in female LFPR
• Effect of Pandemic on Women
Important Observations:
• Labour Force Participation Rate in 2017-18: Total- 49.8%; Male- 75%; Female- 25.3%.
• Female LPFR in Rural Areas (26.6%) higher as compared to Urban Areas (22.3%)
• Decline in the total Female LPFR from 45.2% in 1993-94 to 25.3% in 2017-18.
• Decline in Female LPFR sharper in Rural areas (from 52% in 1993-94 to 26.6% in 2017-18) as compared to Urban
areas (from 25.1% in 1993-94 to 22.3% in 2017-18).
Way forward
Proper implementation of Labour Laws: The Indian Parliament has recently passed the 3 labour codes to simplify
the labour laws, reduce the compliance burden and boost employment creation. Going forward, there is a need to
include provisions to reduce the gender wage gap and improve conditions of work for women. For instance, the
Labour Codes allow women to work in the night shifts. However, it does not place much emphasis on ensuring their
safety at workforce or fixing the responsibility on the management. Hence, there is need to incorporate gender
sensitive policies and rules in our Labour Codes to improve the conditions of work for women, reduce the gender
wage gap and boost female participation.
Other measures include:
• Expansion of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) to provide for
more employment opportunities for women.
• Introduction of an urban employment guarantee programme in the urban areas on lines of MGNREGA
• Systematically address the demand and supply side constraints to improve female LFPR.
Date: 17-May-21 DNS Notes - Revision
• Adequate investment in social infrastructure such as Education, Health, Housing, Child care, Elderly care etc.
This would lead to creation of more employment opportunities for the women and at the same time reduce
their household burden.
Date: 17-May-21 DNS Notes - Revision
3. UPSC Current Affairs: The road from Ladakh is paved with disruptions I Page 06
UPSC Syllabus: GS paper 2 : International Relations
Sub Theme: India-China| UPSC
Disengagement:
Since Galwan stand off last year, India and china have been engaged in series of Military-Diplomatic talks
to arrive at a plan for complete disengagement of troops across the border. Both china and India agreed
on a five-point course of action to disengage and reduce tensions along the Line of Actual Control (LAC)
ü Not allowing differences to become disputes
ü continue their dialogue, quickly disengage, maintain proper distance and ease
tensions
ü Abiding by the existing India-China border protocols and avoiding escalatory action
ü continue to have dialogue and communication through the Special Representative
mechanism on the India-China boundary question
ü Confidence Building Measures to maintain and enhance peace and tranquility in the
border areas
As a result, Chinese withdrew their troops from the North and South banks of Pangong tso lake
Problem resolved?
l Disengagement at pangong tso was only a first small step. Standoff still persists at other locations -
Depsang Plains, Demchok and Gogra-Hot spring region
l Buffer zones were created as part of disengagement process but these buffer zones lie majorly on
the Indian side of LAC, thus converting a hitherto Indian controlled territory into a neutral zone. These
Buffer zones can provide only temporary relief but not permanent solution
l India is also concerned about Chinese activity in the disputed eastern sector- Sikkim and Arunachal
Pradesh
Mutual delineation of LAC is the only long-term solution to the border dispute between India and China.
However, India-china issues are beyond the border domain
Issues in other areas:
• China actively encroaching on India’s sphere of Influence in South Asia and Indian ocean
• China blocking India’s ambitions for permanent membership in UNSC (United Nations Security
Council) and entry into NSG (Nuclear Suppliers Group)
• Chinese state sponsored hackers attacking critical Infrastructure of India
Ex: cyber-attacks on Maharashtra power grid
• Huge Trade deficit for India with China (around $50 bn)
l QUAD joint Vaccine Intitiative- India-US-Japan-Australia at its maiden summit decided to build a first-
of-its-kind joint vaccine supply chain to address the current and any future pandemic situations in the
Indo-Pacific region
l Line of actual Control(LAC) and concerns regarding Chinese cyber attacks were discussed in first
QUAD leadership summit
l Supply Chain Resilience Intitiative - As COVID-19 threatening supply chains, Japan, Australia and India
launched Supply chain resilience inititative recently
However, QUAD is not a pancea to contain China. India should bilaterally resolve the disputes with China
to have peace at border and for economic growth as well.
Date: 17-May-21 DNS Notes - Revision
Context: The Centre has abolished several appellate tribunals and authorities and transferred their
jurisdiction to other existing judicial bodies through the Tribunals Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions
of Service) Ordinance 2021. This Ordinance has been challenged in the Supreme Court.
What has been changed through the Ordinance?
• The Ordinance amends various Acts and has replaced the word “Tribunal” with High Court, Central Government or
other authority for different legislations.
• The Finance Act, 2017 empowered the central government to notify rules on:
(i) qualifications of members of tribunals,
(ii) terms and conditions of their service, and
(iii) composition of search cum selection committees for 19 tribunals (such as the Customs, Excise, and Service
Tax Appellate Tribunals).
• The 2021 Ordinance amends the 2017 Act to include provisions related to the composition of search-cum-
selection committees and term of office of tribunal members in the Act itself.
(Registration and
Protection) Act, 1999
Criticisms:
• Bypassing the legislative process to avoid discussion in Parliament.
• Despite the Supreme Court’s direction in Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank (2019), no judicial
impact assessment was conducted prior to abolishing the tribunals through this Ordinance.
• Fixed tenure of Chairpersons of Tribunals as ruled in Madras Bar Association v. Union of India
(2020) judgment disregarded.
• Centre is yet to constitute a National Tribunals Commission (NTC), an independent umbrella body to
supervise the functioning of tribunals, appointment of and disciplinary proceedings against members,
and to take care of administrative and infrastructural needs of the tribunals. The idea of an NTC was
first mooted in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997), but it has still not seen the light of day.
Way Forward
• Until the NTC is constituted, Ministry of Finance should come up with a transition plan.
• The way to reform the tribunal system is to look at solutions from a systemic perspective
supported by evidence.
• Establishing the NTC will definitely entail a radical restructuring of the present tribunals system.