Fdocuments - in - Six Laning of Kishangarh Udaipur Ahmedabad Feasibility Study For 6 Laning of

Six Laning of Kishangarh-Udaipur-
Ahmedabad Section of NH-79A, NH-79, NH-

76 and NH-8 including New Udaipur Bypass
in the states of Rajasthan and Gujarat
(approx. length 555.50 km) on DBFOT (Toll)
under NHDP Phase-V
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT &

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
Six Laning of Kishangarh -Udaipur Section of NH-79A, NH 79,
NH 76 including New Udaipur Bypass in the state of Rajasthan
on DBFOT (Toll) under NHDP Phase-V
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

& MANAGEMENT PLAN
AUGUST 2011
Six Laning of Kishangarh-Udaipur-Ahmedabad Section of NH-79A, NH-79, NH-76 and NH-8 including New Udaipur Bypass
Preface
The proposed project road is, Six Laning of Kishangarh-Udaipur-Ahmadabad Section of NH-
79A, 79, 76 And NH-8 including New Udaipur Bypass in the State of Rajasthan and Gujarat
(length 555.50 Km) on DBFOT Toll under NHDP Phase V. However the project road consist of
two packages, in the states of Rajasthan and Gujarat, namely,
1. Consultancy services for preparation of feasibility study for six lanning of Kishangarh to
Udaipur Section (km 0.830 to km 309.405) of NH-79/A, NH-79, NH-76 from Kishangarh to
Udaipur including proposed Udaipur bypass in the state of Rajasthan under NHDP Phase V
2. Feasibility study for 6-laning of NH 8 from Udaipur to Ahmedabad in the states of Rajasthan
and Gujarat on DBFO basis under NHDP Phase V
The salient features of the proposed Kishangarh to Ahmedabad project road are
• The terrain along the total project road is plain and partly rolling and hilly.
• Total length of project road is about 555.50km.
• The project road passes through Ajmer, Bhilwara, Chittorgarh, Udaipur and Dungarpur
districts of Rajasthan state and Sabarkantha and Gandhinagar districts of Gujarat state.
• The existing ROW width on the entire length varies from 32.5m to 120m and the proposed
ROW width will be 60.0m minimum including for existing alignment widening to six lanes
configuration as well as for the proposed Udaipur bypass and Mangalwar realignment.
• 60.7790ha of Reserve Forest land diversion shall be required for the project.
• There is no wildlife sanctuary or national park within 10km distance on the either side of the
project road.
• 18,830 trees need to be cut down for the entire project road. (for six laning from Kishangarh
to Udaipur including Udaipur Bypass about 14,572 trees and from end of Udaipur Bypass to
Ahmedabad stretch, about 4,258 trees may needs to be felled)
• The proposed Udaipur bypass, start point of km 117.500 on NH 76 & end point of km
287.00on NH 8 is totaling of 23.500km and connecting NH 76 and NH 8.
• The proposed realignment at Mangalwar, start point of km 170.470 on NH 76 & end point of
km 172.850 on NH 76 is totaling the length of 2.380km.
• Total additional land of 378.31ha needs be acquired for six laning.
• 12no existing major bridges which would be widened or repaired and 7no new bridges would
be newly constructed.
• 249no of existing minor bridges will be widened or repaired and 20no new minor bridges will
be constructed in the project road.
• There are 964no of existing culverts in the project road that would be widened or rehabilitated
and 111 new culverts will be constructed.
• 38 new vehicular underpasses and 114 new pedestrian/cattle underpasses have been provided
in the project road.
• New flyovers have been proposed at 27 locations and 2 interchanges would also be
constructed. The service roads have been provided in the length of 510 Km (both side) on
broken lengths.
• Bus bays have been provided at 85 locations and at 29 locations new truck lay byes are
provided. All major junctions (64) and minor junctions (425) shall be improved in the project
road.
• New toll plazas are proposed at 3 locations in the project road length in addition to five of
existing toll locations are retained and upgraded.
• About 467 residential, 1373 commercial structures and 176 residential cum commercial
structures will be affected due to 6 laning of the project road and all affected families will be
compensated as per NHAI Policy.
i
Six Laning of Kishangarh-Udaipur-Ahmedabad Section of NH-79A, NH-79, NH-76 and NH-8 including New Udaipur Bypass
• The budget for environment management and monitoring has been earmarked as
approximately Rupees 12.40 Crores.
• The estimated cost for Resettlement & Rehabilitation (excluding land acquisition cost) is
approximately rupees 510 Crores.
• The estimated total project cost (TPC) is rupees 5387Crores.
The EIA report is divided into two sections:
Section 1: Six Laning of Kishangarh -Udaipur Section of NH-79A, NH-79, NH-76 including
New Udaipur Bypass in the state of Rajasthan
Section 2: Feasibility Study for Six Laning of NH-8 from Udaipur to Ahmedabad in the states of
Rajasthan/Gujarat.
ii
Six-Laning of Kishangarh-Udaipur Section of NH-79/A, NH-79, NH-76 including Udaipur Bypass in
Rajasthan
1
MAIN INDEX
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT & MANAGEMENT PLAN
CHAPTER - 0: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................... EX-01 to EX-11
CHAPTER - 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1-1 to 1-14
CHAPTER - 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................... 2-1 to 2-44
CHAPTER - 3: ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES .................................................................... 3-1 to 3-5
CHAPTER - 4: DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT .......................................................... 4-1 to 4-33
CHAPTER - 5: ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION

MEASURES ..................................................................................................... 5-1 to 5-25
CHAPTER - 6: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN............................................... 6-1 to 6-10
CHAPTER - 7: PROJECT BENEFITS ......................................................................................... 7-1 to 7-2
CHAPTER - 8: SOCIAL ASSESSMENT .................................................................................. 8-1 to 8-29
CHAPTER - 9: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .......................................... 9-1 to 8-45
ANNEXURE-1: COMPLIANCE OF TOR ............................................................................. A-1 to A-15
ANNEXURE-2.1: ALLIGNMENT MARKED ON TOPO SHEET .................................. A2-1 to A2-11
The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA

Rajasthan
E
1
3
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER-0: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1
0.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1
0.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................... 1
0.3 Description of Existing Environment ............................................................................ 1
0.3.1 Topography ................................................................................................. 1
0.3.2 Seismicity ..................................................................................................... 1
0.3.3 Meteorological Conditions .......................................................................... 1
0.3.4 Soil and Geology .......................................................................................... 2
0.3.5 Land Use Pattern ......................................................................................... 2
0.3.6 Water Resources & Its Quality .................................................................... 2
0.3.7 Ambient Air Quality .................................................................................... 2
0.3.8 Noise Quality ............................................................................................... 2
0.3.9 Forest and Roadside Trees........................................................................... 3
0.3.10 Fauna ........................................................................................................... 3
0.3.11 Socio-Economic Environment ..................................................................... 3
0.4 Anticipated Environmental Impacts And Mitigation Measures ............................... 3
0.4.1 Topography ................................................................................................. 3
0.4.2 Potential Environmental Impacts on Soil .................................................... 3
0.4.3 Impact on Water Environment .................................................................... 5
0.4.4 Impact on Ambient Air Quality .................................................................. 6
0.4.5 Impact on Noise and Vibration ................................................................... 8
0.4.6 Impact on Flora, Fauna and Ecosystem ....................................................... 9
0.4.7 Impacts on Social Environment ................................................................. 10
0.5 Institutional Requirements and Environmental Monitoring Plan .......................... 10
0.6 Project Benefits ............................................................................................................... 11
0.7 Environmental Management Plan ............................................................................... 11
The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-i

Rajasthan
E
1
3
4
CHAPTER-0: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.1 Introduction
National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has taken-up project preparation of
certain selected stretches under NHDP Phase-V, BOT programme, covering km 1560, out
of which km 315 of NH-79A,79 & 76 from Kisangarh (km 0.00 Towards Delhi) to Udaipur
(km 214.00) is a part of this prestigious programme. The project would envisage
widening of existing four- lane highway into six lanes with additional features such as
providing of additional service roads, underpasses, flyovers and bridges so as to enhance
operational efficiency and safety. The proposed six lane Udaipur bypass connecting NH -
76 near Debari to NH 8 near Kaya is part of the project.
0.2 Project Description
The project road is widening of existing four- lane highway into six lanes of Kisangarh-
Udaipur Section of NH-79A,79 &76 in the State of Rajasthan (km 0.00 in Kisangarh
towards Delhi to km 214.00) including Udaipur Bypass. It is a 4-lane road having an
average formation width of 14.0 m and carriageway width of 7.0 m with 1.50m wide
paved and 1.0 m earthen shoulders on either side.The average height of embankment
varies from 1.0 m to 4.0 m. The existing ROW generally varies from 45.0 m to 70.0 m.
The project road traverses through major settlement stretches such as Nasirabad,
Gulabpura, Bhilwara, Chittorgarh, Mangalwara and finally at Udaipur. Nasirabad
settlements start from 36+000 and ends at km 46+000 of NH-79 A. Gulabpara settlements
starts from km 68+000 and ends at 71+000 of NH 79, Bhilwara by-pass starts at km
148+000 and ends at km 169+000, Chittorgarh By-pass starts at km 190+000 and meets at
4-lane Road at km 213+000. This is the end of Chittorgarh by-pass and after that starting
chainage of the project road is in decreasing order towards Udaipur. Mangalwara starts
at km 170+000 and ends at 173+000. At Mangalwara realignment (2 km) has been
provided to avoid displacement of structures. Within the Udaipur City, the project road
is surrounded by settlements and shops and there is no scope for six laning through
Uadipur city. Therefore, bypass has been provided at the Udaipur. The proposed six lane
Udaipur bypass will start at km 117.750 near Debari on NH 76 and end at km 286.800
near Kaya on NH 8. The total length of the proposed bypass is 24 km.
0.3 Description of Existing Environment
0.3.1 Topography
The topography of the entire section of the project road is open and plain. However, In
general, the terrain is plain, rolling and partly hilly.
0.3.2 Seismicity
The project area does not have any history of severe earthquake damage. As per state
wise seismic zonation (Seismic Zoning Map IS: 2000), the project road falls in the state of
Rajasthan and comes under seismic zone I, II and III, means that project road falls under
very low to moderate damage risks zone.
0.3.3 Meteorological Conditions
The climate of the project area is characterized by great extremes of temperature and long
period of severe drought accompanied by high wind velocity and low relative humidity
to semi-arid conditions although sharing the characteristic monsoonal variations through
the year. It is hottest region of India. In the summer time, the climate of Ajmer is very hot
The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-1

Rajasthan
E
1
3
and in winters, it is quite cool. Both in summers as well as in winters, there is a wide 4
difference in the day and night temperature. Regarding the average temperature in
summers (from April to June), the maximum temp is around 45°C & the winter’s season
is quite chilly. The climatic condition is best during the period of October to March &
ideal time to visit.
The climate of the Udaipur district is moderate without significant seasonal variations.
January is the coldest month while May and June are the hottest months. The mean
temperature is 22°C. Average rainfall at the district headquarter is 664 mm.
0.3.4 Soil and Geology
The soil in the project area is developed under the arid and humid climate over the bed
rocks of complex nature, pre-dominantly under the process of laterization. The soil
resulting from the disintegration of various rocks is of a sandy nature, which results from
Schists and quartzite’s, contains large portion of sand and it is found in most of the
project area. In most of the areas it is very shallow, dry and poor quality. Soil resulting
from granite and gneiss contains a certain amount of clay and is comparatively good and
is found in most of Kishangarh ranges.
The tract is mostly occupied by yellowish brown, sandy loam to sandy clay loam. Soil
texture is weak in structure and is permeable. The pH of soil along the project road and
its influence area varies in between 7.5 to 8.4.
The main rocks reported in the project area are the schists, gneisses, migmatites,
quartzite’s and conglomerates of pre- Delhi formation. These rocks are mostly covered by
a mantle of sand and alluvium of recent to sub-recent age. The banded gneisses complex
occurs in most of the areas and is made up of alternates’ band of layers of granite and
biotite geniss or simple granite.
0.3.5 Land Use Pattern
The land use pattern of project corridor, principally categories as urban/commercial,
Industrial, rural, agricultural and liner plantation (declared as protected forest). The
predominant species along the road are babool and lucinia. Agriculture is he main
activity in the project area & the principal cereal crops grown in the area are wheat,
barley, millets, maize, jowar etc. & major pulses are gram, pea and tur.
0.3.6 Water Resources & Its Quality
The water quality of the project area is normally good. Water quality has been monitored
along the project road and result of analysis shows that all the parameters are with in the
permissible limit as per IS 10500.
0.3.7 Ambient Air Quality
Ambient air quality monitoring were carried for PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NOx and CO along the
project road. National air quality standards for rural, residential area and industrial area
are met for monitored parameters (PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NOx and CO) for all AAQM locations.
0.3.8 Noise Quality
Sound Pressure Level (SPL) measurements were undertaken along the project road, with
an interval of about 5 seconds over a period of 10 minutes per hour for 24 hr. Day and
night-time Leq have been calculated from hourly Leq values and compared with the
stipulated standards. Measured Leq noise levels are most of the time, within the limit
stipulated for residential area and commercial area at all the locations.

Rajasthan
E
1
3
0.3.9 Forest and Roadside Trees 4
At places project road is passing through reserve and protected forest area. In the project
road, 60.7790 ha forest land will be diverted for non forestry use for six laning including.
The project road consists multiple rows of eucalyptus plantation at some stretches & rest
is covered with kikar, Neem & Babool & Babool bushes (most are less than 30 cm) within
the ROW. Approximately 14572 trees may be affected during widening of the road.
0.3.10 Fauna
The common wild animals which are reported in the project area are the Neelgai
(Boselaphus tragocamelus), pig (Sus scrofa), jackal (Conis aureus), fox (Vulpes bengalensis),
hare (Lepus ruficandatus), monkey (Macaca mulatta), wild cat (Felis bengalensis) and wild
rabbits, but the project road does not support wildlife except monkeys hence the loss of
wildlife due to collision with vehicles is only a remote possibility.
0.3.11 Socio-Economic Environment
Amenities: There are number of amenities and utility services located along the highway
such as schools, dhabas, clinics, restaurants, repair and spare shops, resting spaces,
parking lots, PCOs, electric transformers, OFC, etc.
Industries: The project road passes through three industrial area viz. Bhilwara Silora &
Mandapam, Around 31 industries are observed along the project corridor in which most
are medium and small scale industries.
0.4 Anticipated Environmental Impacts And Mitigation Measures
0.4.1 Topography
The topography of the project area will not have any significant adverse impact due to
widening of the project road. However, temporary changes in topography in the vicinity
of the project site may be possible because of project related activities. The geology
pattern will be not impacted due to the project activities.
The project includes proposed six lane Udaipur bypass, therefore, impact on the
physiography of the area would be significant during construction phase. The design of
bypass will consider the maintenance of existing drainage conditions through the
providing of cross-drainage structures like culverts and bridges. Design of the cross
drainage structures will follow IRC Guidelines (IRC, 1995).
0.4.2 Potential Environmental Impacts on Soil
Design and Construction Phase
a. Loss of Productive Soil
During construction of the proposed project road including Udaipur bypass, some loss of
productive soil is anticipated because part of land is agricultural land along the road. The
productivity of crops in the region will not be affected by the proposed Udaipur bypass.
Efforts will be made to minimize acquisition of productive lands by finalizing alignment.
The location of construction camp (if any) and other construction sites shall not be located
on productive agricultural land. The topsoil from all areas to be permanently covered
shall be stripped to a specified depth of 150 mm and stored in stockpiles. The stored
topsoil will be utilized for the redevelopment of borrow areas, top dressing of the road
embankments, fill slopes and filling up of tree pits proposed as part of compensatory
plantation.

Rajasthan
E
1
3
Temporary loss of productive soil is likely if haul roads for the transport of borrow 4
materials, traffic detours during construction, etc. are routed through agricultural lands.
b. Soil Erosion
During the construction of the proposed project road including Udaipur bypass, about
14572 trees, shrubs and grasses will need to be cleared along the proposed bypass, which
may pose some soil erosion problem during rains. Suitable mitigation measures will need
to be implemented to prevent the soil erosion problem.
Cutting of hills and excavations of earth from borrow areas may also lead to soil erosion
problem in proposed Udaipur Bypass.
c. Contamination of Soil
During construction of the proposed project road including Udaipur bypass, the
contamination of the soil will be negligible. Further, the contractor shall initiate measures
to minimize waste generation from all construction activities. At construction sites, the
vehicles and equipments will be maintained properly and refueled only at fueling areas,
without any spillages.
d. Compaction of Soil
During construction phase, soil in the productive lands beyond the RoW may be
compacted by the movement of construction vehicles, machinery and equipment.
Mitigation Measures
During the construction phase, mitigation measures to prevent the soil erosion are:
• Re-plantation of trees,
• Good engineering & construction practices
• Turfing on embankment
• Providing mild slopes, not flat nor steep slope,
These steps will efficiently mitigate the potential soil erosion problem and by the time the
proposed bypass starts operating, the ecosystems will restore itself. Soil erosion should
visually check on slops and high embankment areas along the road during construction
phase. In case soil erosion is found along the proposed Udaipur bypass, suitable
measures should be taken to control the soil erosion.
To avoid the soil contamination, at the wash down and re-fueling areas, “oil interceptors”
shall be provided. Unusable debris shall be dumped in nearest landfill sites.
To prevent any compaction of soil in the adjoining productive lands beyond the RoW of
proposed ROW, the movement of construction vehicles, machinery and equipment will
be restricted to the corridor.
Borrow Area and Quarries
For filling and embankment during construction phase, borrow pits need to be excavated
along the proposed project road including Udaipur bypass. For construction of the
bypass, aggregate will be procured from nearest quarry approved by Rajasthan State
Pollution Control Board.

Rajasthan
E
1
3
Mitigation Measures 4
To mitigate the adverse impact during excavation of borrow pits for proposed bypass,
following mitigation measures should be taken:
• Indian Road Congress (IRC):10-1961 guideline should be followed for excavation of
earth from borrow areas.
• Borrow areas should be excavated as per the intended end use by the owner.
The following criteria should be used for selection of borrow pits and amount that can be
borrowed. They are as follows:
Borrow areas should not be located on cultivable lands. However, if it becomes
necessary to borrow earth from temporarily acquired cultivated lands, their depth
should not exceed 45 cm. The topsoil to a depth of 15 cm shall be stripped and set
aside. Thereafter, soil may be dug out to a further depth not exceeding 30 cm and
used in forming the embankment.
Borrow pit shall be selected from wasteland at least 500 m away from the road;
Priority should be given to the borrowing from humps above the general ground
level within the road land;
Priority should be given to the borrowing by excavating/enlarging existing tanks;
Borrowing should be from land acquired temporarily and located at least 500m away
from the road;
Borrowing should be from mounds resulting from the digging of well and lowering
of agricultural fields in vicinity of the road;
In case of settlements, borrow pit shall not be selected within a distance 800 m from
towns or villages. If unavoidable, earth excavation shall not exceed 30 cm in depth.
The haulage distance from site should not be too far.
Aggregate required for the proposed bypass construction should be procured from
quarries approved by Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board.
Operation Phase
No impact is anticipated on soil during the operation phase and therefore, no mitigation
measure is required. However, soil erosion should be visually checked on slops and high
embankment areas along the road during operation phase. In case soil erosion is found,
suitable measures should be taken to control the soil erosion.
0.4.3 Impact on Water Environment
Ground Water Resource
During design and construction phases, drainage pattern and run off flow conditions
along the proposed project road including Udaipur bypass will not be significantly
affected. Water requirement for the proposed bypass will be temporary and meet through
existing surface/ground water sources available place to place along the road. Therefore,
no impact is anticipated on the water resources of the area.

Rajasthan
E
1
3
Use of Local Water Supply 4
No public water source/supply will be used for construction of proposed project road
including Udaipur bypass. Therefore, no impact is anticipated on local water supply
during construction and operation phase.
Water Quality Degradation
The proposed project road including Udaipur bypass construction activities may
temporarily deteriorate surface water quality during rains in terms of turbidity along the
road. However, this impact will be observed only up to first few rains. Therefore, no
significant impact is anticipated on water quality due to construction of the project road
including Udaipur bypass.
Construction of the proposed project road including Udaipur bypass is expected to
complete within the 2 years by deployment of local labours. Few construction camps are
anticipated along the road. These should be located away from water bodies and basic
sanitary facilities should be provided to the labour camps.
Mitigation Measures for Water Environment
Following mitigation measures are suggested to mitigate any adverse impacts during
design and construction phases:
• Provision should be made for proper drainage along the proposed project road
including Udaipur bypass.
• Construction camps, if any, should be properly located to avoid contamination of
surface water bodies by the generation waste and waste water.
• Good engineering practices to be followed to avoid the clogging of water channels
along the project road including proposed Udaipur bypass.
• Water to be used for construction should have separate source.
Operation Phase
During operation phase, water quality, drainage pattern and run off flow conditions
along the proposed Udaipur bypass will not be significantly affected.
0.4.4 Impact on Ambient Air Quality
During construction phase of the project road including proposed Udaipur bypass, there
will be two main sources of air emissions i.e. mobile sources and fixed sources. Mobile
sources are mostly vehicles involve in construction activities while emissions from fixed
sources include diesel generator sets, construction equipment (e.g. compressors) and
excavation/grading activities those produce dust emissions.
Certain amount of dust and gaseous emissions will be generated during the construction
phase from excavation machine and road construction machines. Pollutants of primary
concern include Particulate Matter (PM2.5) and Respirable Suspended Particulate Matter
(PM10). However, suspended dust particles may be coarse and will be settled within a
short distance of construction area. Therefore, impact will be temporary and restricted
within the closed vicinity of the construction activities along the proposed Udaipur
bypass only.

Rajasthan
E
1
3
Considerable amount of emissions of Carbon Monoxide (CO), unburned hydrocarbon, 4
sulfur di-oxide, particulate matters, nitrogen oxides (NOx), etc, will be generated from
the hot mix plants. Hot mix plants should be located away from the populated areas and
be fitted with the air pollution control equipment, the emission shall meet National
standards/ Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board standards. Further, the hot mix
plants must be sited at least 1 km in the downwind direction from the nearest human
settlement. It shall be ensured that the dust emissions from the crusher and vibrating
screen from the stone quarries do not exceed the standards.
Mitigation Measures
It is suggested that roughness of the proposed Udaipur bypass should be as per
IRC:SP:16-2004.
Vehicles delivering loose and fine materials like, sand and fine aggregates shall be
covered to reduce spills on existing road. Water may be sprayed on earthworks, on a
regular basis. During and after compaction of the sub-grade, water will be sprayed at
regular intervals to prevent dust generation.
All slopes and embankments will be turfed as per best engineering practices.
During the construction of the proposed bypass, emissions due to earth works,
transportation of construction materials and vehicular movement along the stretch
will have temporary though significant impact on air quality. However, air quality
level is anticipated to be within the prescribed limit.
The following mitigation measures will also be taken to mitigate the dust entrainment
and fugitive emissions from the various sources:
• Asphalt and hot-mix plants will be located at least 1 km away from inhabited
stretches along the project road including proposed Udaipur bypass with the
clearance from Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board.
• Sprinkling water will control fugitive dust emissions.
• Sprinkling of water on the dust prone areas and construction yard.
• Regular maintenance of machinery and equipment will be carried out.
Ambient air quality monitoring should be carried out during construction phase. If
monitored parameters are above the prescribed limited, suitable control measures must
be taken.
Operation Phase
During the operation phase, air quality along the project road including proposed
Udaipur bypass will be affected by vehicular emissions on the proposed bypass.
Pollutants of primary concern will include NOx, CO, PM2.5, PM10 and SO2. In the
populated area, traffic congestion due to bottlenecks of constructed road may increase the
air pollution problem in the along the road.
Emissions of SPM from the project road including proposed Udaipur bypass will depend
on the roughness on the road.
Mitigation Measures
For operation phase following mitigation measures are suggested to control the air
pollution:

Rajasthan
E
1
3
• Bottlenecks should be avoided for smooth flow of traffic. 4
• Plantation of pollutant adsorbing trees along the road,
Ambient air quality monitoring should be carried out during operation phase. If
monitored parameters are above the prescribed limited, suitable control measures must
be taken.
0.4.5 Impact on Noise and Vibration
Some salient features related to potential noise impact of road development include:
• the road noise impact is greatest where road passes though populated areas,
• the range of noise level should be understood in relation to the habitation type also,
for example, road noise in industrial areas is not likely to be problematic but at
sensitive location like schools, hospitals, its impact may be significant,
During the construction phase of project road including proposed Udaipur bypass, noise
will be generated from the various activities such as site clearing activities, excavation,
erection and finishing. The typical noise levels from these activities are given hereunder:
Site clearing activities 85 dB(A)
Excavation 90 dB(A)
Erection 80 dB(A)
Finishing 85 dB(A)
During the construction phase, the noise level is bound to increase by the use of
construction machines, generators, etc. The increase is expected to be between 10 - 20%.
However, these noise levels will be temporary in nature mostly during daytime only.
Mitigation Measures
Site Controls: Stationary equipment will be placed along un-inhabited stretches as per
distance requirements computed above as far as practicable to minimize objectionable
noise impacts.
Scheduling of Project Activities: Operations will be scheduled to coincide with period
when people would least likely to be affected. Construction activities will be strictly
prohibited between 10 P.M. and 6 A.M. near residential areas.
Protection devices (ear plugs or ear muffs) will be provided to the workers operating in
the vicinity of high noise generating machines.
Construction equipment and machinery should be fitted with silencers and maintained
properly.
Noise measurements should be carried out along the project road including proposed
Udaipur bypass to ensure the effectiveness of mitigation measures.
Operation Phase
During the operation phase, noise will be generated through the vehicles movement.
Noise level will depend up on traffic density, number of traffic event. Plantation along
the proposed Udaipur bypass will be helpful in attenuation of noise levels during
operation phase.

Rajasthan
E
1
3
Mitigation Measures 4
To mitigate the impact of noise levels during operation phase, following mitigation
measure are anticipated:
• Pressure horns in the populated area should be prohibited.
• Developing trees barriers between the road and sensitive area, wherever it is possible.
• Noise measurements should be carried out along the proposed Udaipur bypass to
ensure the effectiveness of mitigation measures.
0.4.6 Impact on Flora, Fauna and Ecosystem
During the design and construction of the proposed bypass, vegetation in the form of
trees, shrubs and grasses will be cleared. Matured trees are growing along the road,
which will need to clear for construction of the project road including proposed Udaipur
bypass.
Important positive and negative impacts on flora, fauna and ecosystem due to proposed
Udaipur bypass are:
• Approximately 14572 trees are scheduled trees growing with RoW of project road
including proposed Udaipur bypass, which may need to be cleared for construction of
the proposed bypass and will be compensated through compensatory afforestation.
• There will be no loss of bio-diversity since no rare/endangered plant or animal species
is going to be eliminated due to the proposed upgrading.
• The proposed bypass will not affect migratory path of animal breeding zone or
important ecosystems.
• The loss of trees and herbal cover at least during the construction phase, is likely to
produce some negative impacts.
• In the length of about 4 km, proposed bypass passes through reserve forest areas.
Therefore, diversion of 60.7790 ha forest land will be required for the proposed
Udaipur bypass.
Mitigation Measures
Careful and proper planning should be done for re-plantation of trees during design and
right at the commencement of construction and the phase wise removal of growing trees
will mitigate the negative impacts.
Compensatory plantation should be started during construction phase parallel to the
construction activities.
Operation Phase
During the operation phase, no adverse impact is anticipated on the flora and fauna of the
area. The plantation along the road on available space will enhance flora in the area.
Mitigation Measures
Compensatory afforestation should be done along the road during operation phase,
where ever, it is possible. Monitoring of survival of trees should be done at regular
interval and suitable mitigation measures should be taken to protect the trees.

Rajasthan
E
1
3
0.4.7 Impacts on Social Environment 4
The project road including proposed Udaipur bypass will have some beneficial impact on
social environment. Some increase in income of local people is expected as some local
unskilled, semiskilled and skilled persons may gain direct or indirect employment during
construction phase. Since the immigration of work force during construction phase is
likely to be very small, the social impacts on literacy, health care, transport facilities and
cultural aspect are expected to be insignificant.
Economic Impacts
The relatively short-lived economic impacts of the construction stage are likely to be
experienced in local communities for the duration of construction as workers make
everyday purchases from local traders. This is likely to give a short-lived stimulus to
these traders that will disappear as soon as the construction is complete. Wider, flow-on
economic impacts will be experienced in other sectors of economy as a result of purchase
of construction materials and the payment of wages and salaries.
Once the construction of the proposed project road including Udaipur bypass is
complete, there is likely to be some long-term changes in the economic structures of the
urban and rural areas served by the project.
Impact on Public Health
Unsanitary conditions in the labour camps might also result in impact on health of
labourers as well as the local population. Transmission of diseases is also facilitated by
the migration of people during construction phase.
During proposed project road including Udaipur bypass construction allied activities like
quarrying and crushing operations, traffic diversions, etc., may cause disruption of social
and economic life of the local population. Other problems perceived are loss of access and
other road accident risks, as a result of diversion of traffic and construction work on road.
Operation stage
Once the construction work is complete, the public health benefits will include beneficial
impacts. The improved road standard will increase accessibility to local and regional
health centers and other community support facilities.
0.5 Institutional Requirements and Environmental Monitoring Plan
Institutional Arrangements
An institutional mechanism needs to be incorporated in the proposed project
management and execution system. The NHAI will be responsible for the implementation
of all the mitigation and management measures suggested in EMP for the project road.
The NHAI is also responsible for implementation the complete resettlement and
rehabilitation for all those affected by the project and is committed to ensure the income
restoration of the project affected and project displaced families.
The NHAI has certain organizational and institutional capacity to be able to satisfactory
complete the implementation of the EMP.
Environmental Monitoring Plan
To ensure the effective implementation of the mitigation measures and environmental
management plan during construction and operation phase of project road, monitoring
plan has been designed for monitoring of ambient air quality, water quality, noise levels,
soil erosion and plantation

Rajasthan
E
1
3
The NHAI has certain organizational and institutional capacity to be able to satisfactory 4
complete the implementation of the EMP.
0.6 Project Benefits
The project road will have tremendous benefits for the area and the region in various
ways as described below.
Direct Benefits
Fast and Safe Connectivity
Decongestion of traffic on the Road
Savings in fuel, travel time and total transportation cost of road users.
Reduction in road accidents.
Reduction in pollution due to constant flow and segregation of traffic from other
roads
Macro Level Benefits
Employment opportunity to people.
Development of tourism.
Development of local industry and handicrafts.
Quick transportation of agricultural produce and perishable goods.
Improved quality of life for people
0.7 Environmental Management Plan
During the design, construction and operation phase of the project road, anticipated
impacts have been identified, assessed and evaluated. Environmental Management Plan
(EMP) also include, reporting procedures and training for implementation of
environmental management plan.
Environmental Budget for Environmental Management Plan
Summary of approximate cost for implementation of mitigation measures and
environmental management plan (EMP) and environmental monitoring is given below:
Sl.No. Various Activities Cost (Rs.)
1.0 Implementation of EMP 101424000
2.0 Environmental Monitoring Cost 1210000
2.0 Environmental Monitoring Cost 1000000
Total 103634000
Say Rs. 10.4 Crores

Rajasthan
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER – 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Identification of Project Proponent ........................................................................................ 1
1.3 Brief Description of the Project ............................................................................................... 1
1.4 General Information on Project Road .................................................................................... 2
1.5 Environmental Clearance Process .......................................................................................... 2
1.5.1 Clearance Requirements for the Project ........................................................................5
1.5.2 Methodology Adopted For Environmental Impact Assessment ...................................5
1.6 Additional Terms of Reference issued by MoEF.................................................................. 7
1.7 Structure of the EIA Report ................................................................................................... 10
1.8 Environmental Standards and Code of Practices............................................................... 11
1.8.1 Applicable Environmental Regulations ......................................................................12
1.8.2 Applicable Indian Road Congress (IRC) Codes To the Project Road ..........................13
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1: Applicable Environmental Regulations ............................................................................. 12

Table 1.2: Applicable IRC Codes Relevant To Highways Environmental Management.............. 13
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1: Stages to obtain the Prior Environmental Clearance ........................................................ 4
The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-i

Rajasthan
1
CHAPTER – 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has taken-up project preparation of
certain selected stretches under NHDP Phase-V, BOT programme, covering about km
1560, out of which km 315 of NH-79A, NH-79 and NH-76 from Kishangarh (km 00.000)
to Udaipur (it end at km 214.000 of NH-76) including Udaipur bypass is a part of this
prestigious programme and NHAI has been appointed the Louis Berger Group, INC.,
USA, as consultant to carry out the feasibility study of this section for widening and
strengthening of existing 4 lane into 6 lane. The project would envisage widening of
existing four- lane highway into six lanes with additional features, such as, providing of
additional service roads, underpasses, flyovers and bridges so as to enhance operational
efficiency and safety.
Environment plays a vital role in overall development of the country. Recognizing the
importance of environmental protection and sustainable development, the Ministry of
Environment and Forests (MoEF), Government of India had formulated policies and
procedures governing the industrial and other developmental activities to prevent
indiscriminate exploitation of natural resources and promote integration of
environmental concern in developmental projects. To assess and evaluate potential
environmental impacts during design, construction & operation phases and to suggest
mitigation measures with detailed environmental management plan, environmental
impact assessment study has been conducted for the project road.
During 102nd Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee of Ministry of Environment of
Forests (MOEF) for Building/Construction Projects/Township and Area Development
Projects, Coastal Regulation Zone, Infrastructure Development & Miscellaneous projects
held on 23rd & 24th June, 2011, the project was considered and Additional ToR was
given. EIA & EMP report has been prepared as per TOR approved by MOEF.
Compliance of Additional ToR is given as Appendix 1 in the end of EIA Report.
1.2 Identification of Project Proponent
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has been entrusted with the
development, maintenance and management of the highways as entrusted to it by the
Government of India. Under NHDP Phase-V, BOT programme, the Govt. has decided to
convert some of the existing 4 lane into 6 lane highways. This project is to be executed
as BOT (Toll) project on DBFOT Pattern. Accordingly, National Highways Authority of
India (NHAI) has taken-up project preparation for six laning of those selected stretches
/ corridors of existing National Highways. The proposed 6 laning of NH-79A, NH-79 &
NH-76 on Kishangarh – Udaipur Section is one among such stretches selected in the
State of Rajasthan State.
1.3 Brief Description of the Project
The project road starts from Kishangarh (Km 0.830 of NH-79A) and ends near
Ahemdabad (Km 509.000 of NH-8) via Bhilwara, Chittorgarh, Mangalwar, Pratapnagar
junction (Udaipur), Balicha, Kaya, Khairwara, Shamlaji, Himmatnagar, Prantij, Chilloda
in the state of Rajasthan and Gujarat (index map is shown below). The existing road is
four lane divided carriageway including existing Bhilwara Bypass and existing
Chittorgarh Bypass, The existing road is part of the NH79A, NH79 and NH76.
The proposed six lane Udaipur bypass will start at km 118.200 near Debari on NH-76
and end at km 286.800 near Kaya on NH-8. The land use pattern of the project area is
The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-1

Rajasthan
1
mainly agriculture land, settlements, industrial and commercial areas including hilly
terrain at some locations along the project road. In general, the terrain is plain, rolling
and partly hilly. The total length of the proposed bypass is 24.00 km.
The RoW of the proposed bypass is varying in between 60 m to 180 m as per design
requirements.
1.4 General Information on Project Road
The 6 laning of NH-79A, NH-79 & NH-76 on Kishangarh – Udaipur Section including
Udaipur Bypass is generally intended to improve the economic and social welfare of the
people. At the same time, it may also create adverse impact on the surrounding
environment. People and properties may be in the direct path of road works are
affected. The environmental impact of highway project may include damage to sensitive
eco-systems, soil erosion, changes to drainage pattern and thereby ground water, loss of
productive agricultural lands, resettlement of people, disruption of local economic
activities, demographic changes and accelerated urbanization. Highway development
and operation should, therefore, be planned with careful consideration of the
environmental impact. To minimize these adverse effects that may be created by the
highway development project, the techniques of Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA) become necessary. Identification and assessment of the potential environmental
impact is an integral part of the project cycle. The Environmental Impact Assessment
studies have been carried as a part of planning process to enable a full consideration of
alternatives, and to avoid later delays and complications. National Highways Authority
of India will have a designated staff member with overall responsibility for
environmental matters and knowledge of environmental laws and regulations.
The main objective of 6-Laning of Kishangarh - Udaipur Section of NH-79 A, NH-79
and NH- 76 including proposed Udaipur Bypass is to ensure:
• Facilitate development of Delhi-Mumbai Segment of Golden Quadrangle by
widening of Kishangarh-Nasirabad-Bhilwara-Chittorgarh-Udaipur corridor i.e. NH-
79A, NH-79 and NH-76 from existing four lane to proposed six lane divided
carriage way through DBFO pattern,
• To provide fast corridor for smooth flow of traffic, minimal adverse social and
environmental impacts and reduce rate of accident with the proposed six widening
and road strengthening,
• Enhanced safety of the traffic, the road users and the people living close to the
highway
• Enhanced operational efficiency of the highway,
• Fulfillment of the access needs of the local population
• Minimal adverse impact on the road users and the local population due to
construction,
• Feasible and constructible options for the project with least cost options.
1.5 Environmental Clearance Process

As per the EIA notification of 14th September 2006 and its amendment dated 1st
December 2009, highway projects are divided into two categories as mentioned below:

Rajasthan
1
Project or Activity Category with threshold limit Conditions if any
A B
7(f) Highways i) New National High (i) All state highway
ways; and project and Highway including
(ii) State highway expressways
ii) Expansion of expansion project in
National High ways hilly terrain (Above General Condition
greater than 30 KM, 1,000m AMSL ) and or shall apply
involving additional ecologically sensitive
right of way greater area
than 20m involving
land acquisition.
Flow-chart depicting stage to obtain the prior environmental clearance for proposed
project are presented in Figure 1.1.

Rajasthan
1
Figure 1.1: Stages to obtain the Prior Environmental Clearance

Rajasthan
1
1.5.1 Clearance Requirements for the Project

The proposed Kishangarh – Udaipur Section including proposed Udaipur Bypass is
designated development under Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2009.
Brief summary of environmental related clearance requirements, concerned agencies
are given below:
Sn Type of Clearance Key Regulation Agency
1. Environmental EIA Notification, 2009 Ministry of Environment &
Clearance under The Environment Forests (MoEF)
(Protection) Act, 1986
2. Consent to Establish Water (Prevention and Rajasthan State Pollution
Control of pollution) Act, Control Board
1974.
The Air (Prevention and

Control of Pollution) Act,
Amendment, 1981, 1982,
1983, 1987;
3. Forest Clearance for Forest (Conservation) Act State Forest Department/

diversion of Forest 1980, Forest Conservation Ministry of Environment &
Land Rules, 1981 Forests (MoEF)
4. Cutting of Trees on Forest (Conservation) Act District Forest Office/Forest

Forest Land 1980, Forest Conservation Department
Rules, 1981.
1.5.2 Methodology Adopted For Environmental Impact Assessment

Environment plays a vital role in overall development of the country. Recognizing the
importance of environmental protection and sustainable development, the Ministry of
Environment and Forest (MoEF), Government of India had formulated policies and
procedures governing the industrial and other developmental activities to prevent
indiscriminate exploitation of natural resources and promote integration of
environmental concern in developmental projects. To assess and evaluate potential
environmental impacts during design, construction & operation phases and to suggest
mitigation measures with detailed environmental management plan, environmental
impact assessment study has been conducted for the project road.
The Ministry of Environment & Forest has made prior environmental clearance (EC) for
highway projects mandatory through its notification issued on 14th September 2006 and
as amended on 1st December 2009.
The following steps are involved in EIA methodology:
Assembly, Literature Survey and Analysis of Data
Assembly, Literature Survey and Analysis of Data Published and other recorded data
e.g. on wildlife, flora, climate, pollution etc. pertaining to the project were studied and
reviewed. TOR and MOEF guidelines were also reviewed prior to carry out EIA studies.
Incorporation of Environmental considerations into the Feasibility study

Rajasthan
1
Scoping process was used to determine the anticipated range of issues to be addressed
and an in-depth study required for environmental analysis during project Design,
Construction and Operational phases. Potential impacts due to widening to six lanes of
the existing highway were determined by conducting physical visit to the project site
and environmental screening. The aim was to address adequately the potential impacts
into the design so as to determine the best suited alignment.
Reconnaissance Surveys
These were undertaken by all members of the study teams initiating with a joint
reconnaissance with the members of the NHAI and those responsible for the
documentation of the environmental investigations and issues.
Preliminary Environmental Screening
The objective behind the environmental screening was to delineate affected
environmental features/issues e.g. waterways, forest areas, plantations / trees, cultural
heritage, market places/human settlements, agricultural land, air, water, natural
resources, noise etc. in the project area, in order to define impacts and to minimize the
adverse environmental impacts by suggesting best engineering solutions / options at
optimal costs and further to categorize and define the scope of Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) study to be conducted.
Documentation of Baseline Conditions
The area of influence of the project was defined considering MoEF requirements (EIA
notification, 14th Sep 2006) and other statutory requirements. Baseline conditions within
the defined area were documented. As per MoEF guidelines for conducting EIA; the
geographical scope of the EIA study will be of 10 km radius for highway project.
However realistically speaking, as the project relates to widening of existing highway,
the direct influence of the project is restricted to Right of Way (ROW) only. Therefore
the baseline status has been documented at the ROW level. However, major
environmental features like wildlife sanctuary, national parks, eco-sensitive zone, and
industrial areas were recorded within 10 km radius of the project road.
Assessment of Potential Impacts
The potential significant impacts were identified on the basis of analytical review of
baseline data, land uses, environmental factors, socio-economic conditions and review
of assessment of potential impacts identified in previous highway projects. Integration
of Environmental Assessments in the design process:
Mainstreaming the Environmental Components
The design and decision-making process, integrated environmental and resettlement
and rehabilitation issues and prompted the early identification of appropriate actions.
Such actions included, for example, shifts in alignments; based on awareness of the
locations of cultural resources, and biological resources such as significant areas of
roadside trees, temples etc. to reduce local impacts.
Assessment of Alternatives
Alternatives were continuously assessed throughout the process. A more formal
assessment was also undertaken as a part of the environmental assessment process
including the assessment of the “No Action” Alternative as is customarily included as a
part of the formal assessment methodologies to ensure that it has been given proper
consideration.

Rajasthan
1
Identified Mitigation & Environmental Enhancement Measures
Positive actions to not only avoid adverse impacts, but to capitalize on opportunities to
correct environmental degradation or improve environmental conditions were
determined.
Community Consultations
Consultations with concerned officials, agencies and potentially affected persons
continued through the process and will continue as the project proceeds. The issues
raised by the community and the various stakeholders were incorporated in the design
and construction/operation plan of the project highway.
Preparation of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP)
An EMP will be prepared to specify the steps necessary to ensure that the necessary
measures have been and will be taken. This includes the monitoring plan and gives
details of the resources budgeted and the implementation arrangements.
1.6 Additional Terms of Reference issued by MoEF
During 102nd Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee of Ministry of Environment of
Forests (MOEF) for Building/Construction Projects/Township and Area Development
Projects, Coastal Regulation Zone, Infrastructure Development & Miscellaneous projects
held on 23rd and 24th June, 2011, the project was considered and Additional ToR was
given. EIA & EMP report has been prepared as per TOR approved by MOEF.
Compliance of Additional ToR is given as Appendix 1 in the end of EIA Report.
The Committee noted that as per (A) of OM dated 31.03.2011, the proponent has applied
for state-I forestry clearance.
During the discussions, the Committee finalized the following additional ToR for
further study:
(i) The proposal indicates the acquisition of 46.6292 ha forest land. Necessary
stage ?I forestry clearance shall be obtained as per OM dated 31.03.2011 and
submitted along with final EIA report
(ii) Examine and submit a brief description of the project, project name, nature,
size, its importance to the region/state and the country.
(iii) Any litigation(s) pending against the proposed project and/or any directions
or orders passed by any court of law/any statutory authority against the
project is to be detailed out.
(iv) Submit detailed alignment plan, with details such as nature of terrain (plain,
rolling, hilly), land use pattern, habitation, cropping pattern, forest area,
environmentally sensitive places, mangroves, notified industrial areas, sand
dunes, sea, river, lake, details of villages, teshils, districts and states, latitude
and longitude for important locations falling on the alignment by employing
remote sensing techniques followed by ground truthing and also through
secondary data sources.
(v) Describe various alternatives considered, procedures and criteria adopted for
selection of the final alternative with reasons.
(vi) Submit Land use map of the study area to a scale of 1:25000 based on recent
satellite imagery delineating the crop lands (both single and double crop),
agricultural plantations, fallow lands, waste lands, water bodies, built-up

Rajasthan
1
areas, forest area and other surface features such as railway tracks, ports,
airports, roads, and major industries etc. and submit a detailed ground
surveyed map on 1:2000 scale showing the existing features falling within
the right of way namely trees, structures including archaeological &
religious, monuments etc. if any.
(vii) It is indicated that 18830 trees are proposed to be cut, the information should
be provided about their species and whether it also involved any protected
or endangered species. Necessary green belt shall be provided on both side
of the highway with proper central verge and cost provision should be made
for regular maintenance.
(viii) The proposed route is passing through a city/town, with houses and human
habitation on the either side of the road, the necessity for provision of
bypasses/diversions/under passes shall be examined and submitted. The
proposal should also indicate the location of wayside amenities, which
should include petrol station/service centre, rest areas including public
conveyance etc.
(ix) Submit details about measures taken for the pedestrian safety and
construction of underpasses and foot-over bridges along with flyovers and
interchanges.
(x) Assess whether there is a possibility that the proposed project will adversely
affect road traffic in the surrounding areas (e.g. by causing increases in
traffic congestion and traffic accidents).
(xi) Examine and submit the details of sand quarry, borrow area and
rehabilitation.
(xii) Climate and meteorology (max and min temperature, relative humidity,
rainfall, frequency of tropical cyclone and snow fall); the nearest IMD
meteorological station from which climatological data have been obtained to
be indicated.
(xiii) The air quality monitoring should be carried out as per the new notification
issued on 16th November, 2009.
(xiv) Clearly indicate/provide details regarding the location, date (along with site
photographs with the background of monitoring equipments and/or sample
collection in process) and protocol adopted for sampling and analysis of
various environmental parameters as a part of the baseline data collection.
(xv) Identify project activities during construction and operation phases, which
will affect the noise levels and the potential for increased noise resulting
from this project. Discuss the effect of noise levels on near by habitation
during the construction and operational phases of the proposed highway.
Identify noise reduction measures and traffic management strategies to be
deployed for reducing the negative impact if any. Prediction of noise levels
should be done by using mathematical modelling at different representative
locations.
(xvi) Examine the impact during construction activities due to generation of
fugitive dust from crusher units, air emissions from hot mix plants and
vehicles used for transportation of materials and prediction of impact on
ambient air quality using appropriate mathematical model, description of

Rajasthan
1
model, input requirement and reference of derivation, distribution of major
pollutants and presentation in tabular form for easy interpretation shall be
carried out.
(xvii) Also examine and submit the details about the protection to existing
habitations from dust, noise, odour etc. during construction stage.
(xviii) If the proposed route involves cutting of earth, the details of area to be cut,
depth of cut, locations, soil type, volume and quantity of earth and other
materials to be removed with location of disposal/dump site along with
necessary permission.
(xix) If the proposed route is passing through low lying areas, details of fill
materials and initial and final levels after filling above MSL, should be
examined and submit.
(xx) Examine and submit the water bodies including the seasonal ones within the
corridor of impacts along with their status, volumetric capacity, quality
likely impacts on them due to the project.
(xxi) Examine and submit details of water quantity required and source of water
including water requirement during the construction stage with supporting
data and also classification of ground water based on the CGWA
classification.
(xxii) Examine and submit expected fuel savings due to the project.
(xxiii) Examine and submit the details of the criteria followed by NHAI/
implementing agency to assess the necessity of providing ?
FOBs/Underpass/ by pass/ service ducts etc.
(xxiv) Institutional frame work for the review of accidents and plan for corrective
measures.
(xxv) Examine and submit the legal frame work to tackle the illegal encroachments
along the highway.
(xxvi) Sensitive buildings such as academic institutions, hospitals etc just adjacent
to the highway shall be inventorised and examine submit mitigation
measures/ traffic safety measures.
(xxvii) Examine and submit the details of measures taken during constructions of
bridges across river/canal/major or minor drains keeping in view the
flooding of the rivers and the life span of the existing bridges. Provision of
speed breakers, safety signals, service lanes and foot paths should be
examined at appropriate locations through out the proposed road to avoid
the accidents.
If there will be any change in the drainage pattern after the proposed activity,
details of changes shall be examined and submitted.
Rain water harvesting pit should be at least 3 - 5 m. above the highest ground
water table. Provision shall be made for oil and grease removal from surface
runoff.
(xxviii) Submit the details of road safety, signage, service roads, vehicular under
passes, accident prone zone and the mitigation measures.

Rajasthan
1
(xxix) IRC guidelines shall be followed for widening & up-gradation of road.
(xxx) Submit details of social impact assessment due to the proposed construction
of road.
(xxxi) Examine road design standards, safety equipment specifications and

Management System training to ensure that design details take account of
safety concerns and submit the traffic management plan. Road safety audit
shall be carried out and report shall be submitted to the Ministry.
(xxxii) Accident data and geographic distribution should be reviewed and analyzed
to predict and identify trends? in case of expansion of the existing highway
and provide Post accident emergency assistance and medical care to accident
victims.
(xxxiii) If the proposed project involves any land reclamation, details to be provided
for which activity land to reclaim and the area of land to be reclaimed.
(xxxiv) Details of the properties, houses, businesses etc. activities likely to be effected
by land acquisition and their financial loses annually.
(xxxv) Detailed R&R plan with data on the existing socio-economic status of the
population in the study area and broad plan for resettlement of the displaced
population, site for the resettlement colony, alternative livelihood concerns/
employment and rehabilitation of the displaced people, civil and housing
amenities being offered, etc and the schedule of the implementation of the
project specific
(xxxvi) Submit details of Corporate Social Responsibility. Necessary provisions
should be made in the budget.
(xxxvii) Estimated cost of the project including environmental monitoring cost and
funding agencies, whether governmental or on the basis of BOT etc and
provide details of budget provisions (capital & recurring) for the project
specific R&R Plan.
(xxxviii) Submit environmental management and monitoring plan for all phases
of the project viz. construction and operation.
1.7 Structure of the EIA Report
The EIA and report has been structured into the following chapters:
Executive Summary:
Briefly discusses key environmental issues and recommended actions.
Chapter 1 as Introduction provides the brief introduction, scope and methodology of
EIA and Terms of Reference of the project.
Chapter 2 as Project Description provides the description of the project which includes
location, type, need and purpose of the project.
Chapter 3 as Analysis of Alternatives discusses the criteria for identification and
analysis of alternatives, description of various alternatives including “No Change”
alternative.

Rajasthan
1
Chapter 4 as Description of Environment describes the environmental setting of the
project area baseline conditions relating to meteorology, physical environment, water
resources, noise, air as well as flora and fauna.
Chapter 5 as Anticipated Environmental Impact and Mitigation Measures covers the
anticipated impact on the environment and mitigation measures. The method of
assessment of impact including studies carried out, modeling techniques adopted to
assess the impact where pertinent shall be elaborated in this chapter. It should give the
details of the impact on the baseline parameters, both during the construction and
operational phases and mitigation measures to be implemented by the proponent.
Chapter 6 as Environmental Monitoring Programme presents environmental
management plan to ensure effective implementation of Environmental Management
Plan.
Chapter 7 as Project Benefits brings out details of benefits by way of improvement in
the physical infrastructure, social infrastructure, employment potential and other
tangible benefits.
Chapter 8 as Social Impact Assessment presents anticipated social impacts due to land
and structures acquisition.
Chapter 9 as Environmental Management Plan provides cost effective environmental
management plan to eliminate/offset the identified environmental impact, so that
development will become environmentally sound.
1.8 Environmental Standards and Code of Practices
The up-gradation of six laning of Kishangarh – Udaipur Section including Udaipur
Bypass is associated with various adverse environmental impacts. Construction and
operational activities of the road project fall under the preview of various
environmental and social regulations promulgated time to time by Government of India
and State Government. Even before India’s independence in 1947, several
environmental and social/resettlement related legislations existed but the real impetus
for bringing about a well-developed framework came only after the United Nations
Conference on the Human Environment (Stockholm, 1972). Under the influence of this
declaration, the National Council for Environmental Policy and Planning within the
Department of Science & Technology was set-up in 1972. The Department of
Environment was established in 1980 and later evolved into a full-fledged Ministry of
Environment and Forests (MoEF) in 1985, which today is the apex administrative body
in the country for regulating and ensuring environmental protection. After the
Stockholm Conference, in 1976, constitutional sanction was given to environmental
concerns through the 42nd Amendment, which incorporated them into the Directive
Principles of State Policy and Fundamental Rights and Duties. In past two decades, an
extensive network of environmental legislation has grown in the country.
The Constitution of India directs the State to endeavor to protect and improve the
environment and to safeguard forest and wildlife of the country. Article 51(g) of the
Constitution states that it shall be the duty of every citizen of India to protect and
improve the national environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife and to
have compassion for living creatures. The language of the Directive Principles of the
State Policy (Article 47) also contains a specific provision, which commits the state to
protect the environment. In addition to Constitutional provisions, India has established
a comprehensive set of laws for the management and protection of the environment.

Rajasthan
1
The Environmental Acts, Rules, Notifications and Amendments applicable for the up-
gradation of the project road include the following:
• The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 with applicable Rules/ Legislation’s; and
Notifications;
• Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974
• The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, Rules and Amendment, 1981,
1982, 1983, 1987;
• The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act and Rules, 1974, 1975;
• The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977
• Forest (Conservation) Act 1980, Forest Conservation Rules, 1981
• National Environment Tribunal Act, 1995
• Wildlife Protection Act 1972
• Disposal of Flyash Notification 2009
• Noise (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000
• Municipal Solid Waste (Management And Handling) Rules, 2000
• The Hazardous Waste (Management And Handling) Rules, 2008
• Biodiversity Act, 2002
• EIA Notification, 2009
• Applicable environmental standards as specified by CPCB.
1.8.1 Applicable Environmental Regulations

Applicable environmental acts, rules and regulation, application to the proposed up-
gradation of the project road are as given in Table 1.1:
Table 1.1: Applicable Environmental Regulations
S.No Legal Framework Coordinating Objectives/Highlights of
Agency Framework.
Environment Legal Framework
1. Water (Prevention and CPCB, OSPCB Prohibits the discharge of
Control of pollution) pollutants into water bodies
Act 1974 beyond a given standard, and lays
down penalties for non-
compliance.
2. Water (Prevention and CPCB, OSPCB Provides for a levy and collection
Control of Pollution) of a cess on water consumed by
Cess Act, 1977 industries and local authorities.
3. Forest (Conservation) MoEF, Restrictions on conversions of
Act 1980, Forest Regional, State Forest for uses other than
Conservation Rules, Forest reforestation, including use for
1981 Department roads.
(SFD)
4. Air (Prevention and CPCB, OSPCB Provides means for the control and
Control of Pollution) abatement of air pollution.
Act, 1981
5. The Air (Prevention and CPCB, OSPCB Defined the procedures for

Rajasthan
1
S.No Legal Framework Coordinating Objectives/Highlights of
Agency Framework.
Control of Pollution) conducting meetings of the boards,
Rules, 1982 the powers of the presiding
officers, decision-making etc.
6. Environment Ministry of Ensure that appropriate measures
(Protection) Act 1986 Environment and are taken to conserve and protect
followed by amendment Forests (MoEF) the environment before
in commencement of operations.
7. Environmental Impact Identifies highways among other
Assessment Notification project categories that need
2009 environmental clearance from the
Central Government in form of an
approved Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA).
8. Flyash Notification 2009 MoEF Mandates use of flyash in road
construction.
9. The Environment MoEF, CPCB & Lay down the procedures for
(Protection) Rules, 1986 OSPCB setting standards of emission or
discharge of environmental
pollutants.
10. National Environment National To provide for strict liability for
Tribunal Act, 1995 Environment damages arising out of any
Tribunal accident occurring while handling
any hazardous substance.
11. Biodiversity Act 2002 National To provide for conservation of
Biodiversity biodiversity, sustainable use of
Authority/State resources fair and equitable
authorities sharing of the benefits from use of
resources.
12. NRRP 2007 MoEF Provide procedures for land
acquisition and compensation for
project affected families.
1.8.2 Applicable Indian Road Congress (IRC) Codes To the Project Road
Thirteen IRC codes and guidelines (Table 1.2) have been segregated that have a direct
role in the environmental management during design and construction stages. Details
of these codes have been presented in Table 1.2. Indeed most of them were formulated
without a proper environmental management backing, therefore a revision of these
documents incorporating the environmental and social dimension would make these
codes more sensible with double (Engineering and Environmental) applicability i.e.,
both engineering as well as environmental management requirements.
Table 1.2: Applicable IRC Codes Relevant To Highways Environmental Management
Sn. IRC code Theme Year Purpose Applicability/
Comments
1. Recommended IRC: 10 1961 Issues relating to Direct (need to
practice for borrow Borrow pits include EMP and
pits for Rural road revise)
embankments
constructed by manual
operations
2. Recommendations for IRC: 34-1970 Construction in Indirect. Consider
road construction in water logged areas Ecological aspect

Rajasthan
1
Sn. IRC code Theme Year Purpose Applicability/
Comments
water logged areas and revise
3. Road accident forms IRC: 53-1982 Road safety FIR Old document
A-1 (first edition) forms (completely
out dated)
4. Guidelines for IRC: 103 -1988 Safety of Direct/Old
Pedestrian Facilities pedestrians
5. Guidelines for EIA of IRC:104-1988 EIA guide lines Direct (need
Highway projects revisions to
include
EMP/BOQ etc)
6. Ribbon developments IRC: SP: 1996 Control by various Direct/old
on highways and its measures that
prevention includes Legislation
7. Manual on IRC: SP: 21- Landscaping of road In direct (very old
Landscaping of road 1979 document)
8. Report containing IRC: SP: 27- Highway safety Direct
recommendations of 1984
IRC Regional
workshops on
highway safety
9. Road safety for IRC: SP: 32- Highway safety for Direct
Children (5-12 years 1988 Children’s
old)
10. Guidelines on road IRC: SP: 42- Drainage Direct
drainage 1994
11. Highway safety code IRC: SP: 44- Highways safety Direct
1994
12. Guidelines for safety IRC: SP: 55- Safety during Direct
in construction zones 2001 construction
13. Hill Road Manual IRC: SP: 48- Hill road Direct
1988

Rajasthan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER – 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................1

2.1 Project Location ....................................................................................................................1
2.2 Description Of The Project ..................................................................................................1
2.3 Details of Bypasses/ Realignment .....................................................................................2
2.4 Services Roads ......................................................................................................................2
2.5 Proposed Right of Way (ROW) ..........................................................................................7
2.6 At Grade Junctions.............................................................................................................10
2.7 Proposed Grade Separated Structures (Flyovers) / Interchanges ..............................16
2.8 Interchanges ........................................................................................................................17
2.9 Rehabilitation / Repair of Existing Elevated Structures ..............................................17
2.10 Details of Proposed and Existing Vehicular Underpasses ...........................................17
2.11 Details of Proposed Pedestrian Underpasses.................................................................18
2.12 Major and Minor Bridges ..................................................................................................20
2.12.1 Construction of Additional Major Bridges .................................................................20
2.12.2 New Minor Bridges/ Minor Bridges to be Reconstructed...........................................21
2.12.3 New Minor Bridges on Service Roads ........................................................................21
2.12.4 Minor Bridges Proposed to be Widened ......................................................................23
2.13 Improvement Proposals for Culverts ..............................................................................23
2.14 New Rail Over Bridges (ROBs) ........................................................................................34
2.15 Retaining Wall / RE Wall .................................................................................................35
2.16 Roadside Furniture ............................................................................................................35
2.17 Proposed Truck Lay-byes Locations ...............................................................................36
2.18 Bus Bays and Bus shelters .................................................................................................36
2.19 Road Safety for the Project Road .....................................................................................38
2.20 Typical Cross section .........................................................................................................38
2.21 Man Power Requirement ..................................................................................................42
2.22 Project Implementation Schedule ....................................................................................42
2.23 Road Safety Audit ..............................................................................................................42

Rajasthan
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Details of Service Roads on the Project Road ...................................................................... 3

Table 2.2: Proposed Right of Way (ROW) ............................................................................................. 7
Table 2.3: Major Junctions (On cross roads at the location of Flyovers/Underpasses) to be
Improved ......................................................................................................................................... 10
Table 2.4: Minor Junctions (on Service Road) to be improved ......................................................... 12
Table 2.5: Details of Proposed Grade Separated Structure (Flyovers) / Interchanges ................. 16
Table 2.6: Interchanges ........................................................................................................................... 17
Table 2.7: Rehabilitation / Repair of Existing Elevated Structures.................................................. 17
Table 2.8: Details of Proposed Vehicular Underpasses ..................................................................... 18
Table 2.9: Details of Vehicular Underpasses To Be Widened ........................................................... 18
Table 2.10: Details of Proposed Pedestrian Underpasses .................................................................. 18
Table 2.11: Construction of Additional Major Bridges ...................................................................... 20
Table 2.12: New Minor Bridges/ Minor Bridges to be Reconstructed ............................................ 21
Table 2.13: New Minor Bridges on Service Road ............................................................................... 21
Table 2.14: Minor Bridges where Widening is Proposed .................................................................. 23
Table 2.15: Minor Bridges on Service Road ......................................................................................... 23
Table 2.16: New Box/ Slab Culverts on the Project Road ................................................................. 23
Table 2.17: Box/ Slab Culverts to be Widened ................................................................................... 24
Table 2.18: Slab Culverts to be Reconstructed on the Project Road ................................................. 29
Table 2.19: Pipe Culverts to be Reconstructed as a Box Culvert ...................................................... 31
Table 2.20: Pipe Culverts to be Widened ............................................................................................. 32
Table 2.21: New Rail Over Bridges (ROBs) ......................................................................................... 34
Table 2.22: Rehabilitation / Repair of Rail Over Bridges (ROBs)..................................................... 34
Table 2.23: Proposed Truck Lay-byes Locations................................................................................. 36
Table 2.24: Bus Bays and Bus Shelters .................................................................................................. 36
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1: Project Index Map.................................................................................................................. 1
The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 2-ii

Rajasthan
CHAPTER – 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 Project Location

The Kishangarh – Udaipur project road including Udaipur Bypass lies between the
geographical coordinates of 25035.5’N and 73044.5’E to 26035.5’N and 74054’E. The entire
length falls in Rajasthan State and passes through Ajmer, Bhilwara, Chittorgarh and
Udaipur districts. The terrain is plain except some stretches on Bhilwara bypasses and
near Udaipur bypass, which are hilly. The route index map covering the project road
sections is shown in Figure 2.1 and alignment marked on toposheet is also shown in
Annexure 2.1.
Figure 2.1: Project Index Map

2.2 Description Of The Project
The project road corridor is a Section of NH-79A, NH-79 and NH-76 starting from
Kishangarh (km 364.00 of NH-8, 0.0 km towards Delhi) it meets with NH-79 at km 14.10
(0 km at Ajmer) after traversing 36.0 km and follows NH-79 up to Chittorgarh (Km
183.000 of NH-79) and (Km 220.00 of NH-76) via Chittorgarh and meets Udaipur
Bypass at Km 113.825. The length of the Udaipur By-pass is 24 km. The road passes
through the important towns of Nasirabad (km 14.00 of NH-79), Bhilwara (Km 120.23 of
NH-79), and Chittorgarh (Km 183.00 of 79) in the Rajasthan State.

Rajasthan
The present configuration of the road is 4-lane in rural areas and 4-lane plus service
roads of 5.5 m width (5.0 m carriageway+2*0.25m kerb shyness) on both sides in urban
areas. At some places the service road is found to be only 3.5m (3.5m
carriageway+2*0.25 m kerb shyness).
The project road traverses through major settlements stretches such as Nasirabad,
Gulabpura, Bhilwara, Chittorgarh, Mangalwara and finally at Udaipur. Nasirabad
settlement starts from 36+000 and ends at km 46+000 of NH-79 A. Gulabpara settlement
starts from km 68+000 and ends at 71+000 of NH 79, Bhilwara by-pass starts at km
148+000 and ends at km 169+000, Chittorgarh by-pass starts at km 190+000 and meets
at 4-lane road at km 213+000. This is the end of Chittorgarh by-pass and after that
starting chainage of the project road is in decreasing order towards Udaipur.
Mangalwara starts at km 170+000 and ends at 173+000. At Mangalwara the project road
traverses in highly congested areas with shops and Temple and there is no sufficient
ROW for widening of road from 4-lane to 6-lane. Hence, realignment has been provided
at Mangalwara.
The proposed six lane Udaipur bypass will start at km 118.200 near Debari on NH 76 and
end at km 286.800 near Kaya on NH 8. The proposed six lane Udaipur bypass is located
in Udaipur District. In general, the terrain is plain, rolling and partly hilly. The total
length of the proposed bypass is 24.00 km.
The maximum portion of the project road passes almost through plain terrain and the
area constitutes barren and agricultural fields and bajra, jowar, wheat, barley, maize,
small millets and rice are the main agricultural produce. There are number of shops,
petrol pumps and built-up areas on the both sides of the project road & a number of
village roads on either side of the national highway connect the fields as well as
villages.
2.3 Details of Bypasses/ Realignment
In the project road, bypasses/ realignments have been provided to avoid the congested
stretches. Details of bypasses and realignments are as given below:
1. Bypasses
Sl. Existing Chainage (km) Design Chainage (km) Length
Remarks
No. From To From To (Km)
117.750 287.000 Udaipur
1 309.405 333.185 23.780
(NH – 76) (NH – 8) Bypass
2. Realignment
Sl. Existing Chainage (km) Design Chainage (km) Length
Remarks
Mangalwar
1 172.850 170.470 267.190 269.255 2.065
Realignment
2.4 Services Roads
The service roads are proposed on both sides of the carriageway for plying of local
traffic. The need of the service road was accessed through local traffic movement and
settlements along the project corridor. There are number of villages/settlements
scattered throughout the project corridor. There are isolated rural stretches but looking
at the rate of development along the corridor and very objective of six lanning i.e. not to
keep any direct access of local traffic to main highway, the need to provide the service
road throughout the project corridor length is realized and hence it is proposed to

Rajasthan
construct the service road on both sides throughout. The service road is terminated at
all the locations of major bridges and locations of ROB’s. All the cross road are proposed
to have junctions with service road with left in and left out arrangement. Details of
services roads are given in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1: Details of Service Roads on the Project Road
Sl. Road Existing Chainage (km) Design Chainage (km) Length Sides
No. From To From To
1. NH 79 A 1.100 1.350 0.270 0.520 0.25 LHS
2. NH 79 A 3.150 3.550 2.320 2.720 0.40 LHS
3. NH 79 A 4.350 12.600 3.520 11.770 8.25 LHS
4. NH 79 A 15.350 15.500 14.520 14.670 0.15 LHS
5. NH 79 A 16.350 16.550 15.520 15.720 0.20 LHS
6. NH 79 A 17.600 18.000 16.770 17.170 0.40 LHS
7. NH 79 A 18.750 25.000 17.920 24.170 6.25 LHS
8. NH 79 A 25.650 26.150 24.820 25.320 0.50 LHS
9. NH 79 A 28.200 29.400 27.370 28.570 1.20 LHS
10. NH 79 A 30.050 32.000 29.220 31.170 1.95 LHS
11. NH 79 A 33.200 36.100 32.370 35.270 2.90 LHS
12. NH 79 15.000 15.100 35.270 35.370 0.10 LHS
13. NH 79 16.650 20.600 36.920 40.870 3.95 LHS
14. NH 79 23.000 24.050 43.270 44.320 1.05 LHS
15. NH 79 28.550 29.800 48.820 50.070 1.25 LHS
16. NH 79 33.000 33.100 53.270 53.370 0.10 LHS
17. NH 79 35.400 35.500 55.670 55.770 0.10 LHS
18. NH 79 37.000 39.100 57.270 59.370 2.10 LHS
19. NH 79 39.875 40.350 60.145 60.620 0.48 LHS
20. NH 79 41.650 45.100 61.920 65.370 3.45 LHS
21. NH 79 48.150 49.450 68.420 69.720 1.30 LHS
22. NH 79 51.450 52.725 71.720 72.995 1.28 LHS
23. NH 79 54.750 56.100 75.020 76.370 1.35 LHS
24. NH 79 56.750 57.300 77.020 77.570 0.55 LHS
25. NH 79 58.950 62.500 79.220 82.770 3.55 LHS
26. NH 79 64.050 69.500 84.320 89.770 5.45 LHS
27. NH 79 70.450 70.550 90.720 90.820 0.10 LHS
28. NH 79 72.350 75.800 92.620 96.070 3.45 LHS
29. NH 79 78.750 79.575 99.020 99.845 0.83 LHS
30. NH 79 79.950 80.325 100.220 100.595 0.38 LHS
31. NH 79 81.700 85.150 101.970 105.420 3.45 LHS
32. NH 79 86.750 87.750 107.020 108.020 1.00 LHS
33. NH 79 90.100 91.300 110.370 111.570 1.20 LHS
34. NH 79 92.550 92.650 112.820 112.920 0.10 LHS
35. NH 79 93.900 96.000 114.170 116.270 2.10 LHS
36. NH 79 96.400 97.550 116.670 117.820 1.15 LHS
37. NH 79 98.800 99.100 119.070 119.370 0.30 LHS
38. NH 79 99.775 100.500 120.045 120.770 0.725 LHS
39. NH 79 101.000 101.450 121.270 121.720 0.450 LHS

Rajasthan
No. From To From To
40. NH 79 103.200 111.050 123.470 131.320 7.85 LHS
41. NH 79 111.750 111.850 132.020 132.120 0.10 LHS
42. NH 79 112.500 118.600 132.770 138.870 6.10 LHS
43. NH 79 119.450 120.400 139.720 140.670 0.95 LHS
44. NH 79 122.550 123.375 142.820 143.645 0.83 LHS
45. NH 79 126.050 126.750 146.320 147.020 0.70 LHS
46. NH 79 127.350 127.450 147.620 147.720 0.10 LHS
47. NH 79 128.300 134.900 148.570 155.170 6.60 LHS
48. NH 79 137.975 138.800 158.245 159.070 0.83 LHS
49. NH 79 141.750 153.850 162.020 174.120 12.10 LHS
50. NH 79 155.350 156.050 175.620 176.320 0.70 LHS
51. NH 79 162.600 162.800 182.870 183.070 0.20 LHS
52. NH 79 163.900 164.000 184.170 184.270 0.10 LHS
Chittorgarh
53. 0.000 4.850 184.270 189.120 4.85 LHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
54. 8.225 8.225 192.495 192.495 0.00 LHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
55. 9.200 11.650 193.470 195.920 2.45 LHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
56. 17.300 18.150 201.570 202.420 0.85 LHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
57. 18.750 19.050 203.020 203.320 0.30 LHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
58. 19.950 24.750 204.220 209.020 4.80 LHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
59. 26.250 27.150 210.520 211.420 0.90 LHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
60. 29.300 29.600 213.570 213.870 0.30 LHS
Bypass
61. NH - 76 213.000 212.000 213.870 214.870 1.00 LHS
62. NH - 76 209.500 207.550 217.370 219.320 1.95 LHS
63. NH - 76 205.900 205.400 220.970 221.470 0.50 LHS
64. NH - 76 203.050 200.800 223.820 226.070 2.25 LHS
65. NH - 76 199.500 199.000 227.370 227.870 0.50 LHS
66. NH - 76 197.450 192.700 229.420 234.170 4.75 LHS
67. NH - 76 191.600 183.700 235.270 243.170 7.90 LHS
68. NH - 76 182.800 181.600 244.070 245.270 1.20 LHS
69. NH - 76 180.700 180.075 246.170 246.795 0.63 LHS
70. NH - 76 177.250 176.550 249.620 250.320 0.70 LHS
71. NH - 76 173.000 172.800 253.870 254.070 0.20 LHS
72. NH - 76 170.400 166.800 256.155 259.755 3.60 LHS
73. NH - 76 164.050 160.200 262.505 266.355 3.85 LHS
74. NH - 76 157.050 155.650 269.505 270.905 1.40 LHS
75. NH - 76 154.100 153.750 272.455 272.805 0.35 LHS
76. NH - 76 152.300 151.700 274.255 274.855 0.60 LHS
77. NH - 76 149.900 149.800 276.655 276.755 0.10 LHS
78. NH - 76 147.050 146.450 279.505 280.105 0.60 LHS

Rajasthan
No. From To From To
79. NH - 76 144.400 138.100 282.155 288.455 6.30 LHS
80. NH - 76 136.600 134.600 289.955 291.955 2.00 LHS
81. NH - 76 133.650 133.550 292.905 293.005 0.10 LHS
82. NH - 76 132.500 119.500 294.055 307.055 13.00 LHS
83. NH - 76 119.000 117.300 307.555 309.255 1.70 LHS
Udaipur
84. 2.200 2.605 LHS
Bypass 311.605 312.010 0.405
Udaipur
85. 3.300 3.660 LHS
Bypass 312.705 313.065 0.360
Udaipur
86. 4.120 4.850 LHS
Bypass 313.525 314.255 0.730
Udaipur
87. 5.400 7.020 314.805 316.425 1.620 LHS
Bypass
Udaipur
88. 12.300 13.100 321.705 322.505 0.800 LHS
Bypass
Udaipur
89. 12.900 13.750 322.305 323.155 0.850 LHS
Bypass
90. NH 79 A 1.100 1.350 0.270 0.520 0.25 RHS
91. NH 79 A 3.150 3.550 2.320 2.720 0.40 RHS
92. NH 79 A 4.350 10.150 3.520 9.320 5.80 RHS
93. NH 79 A 12.050 12.600 11.220 11.770 0.55 RHS
94. NH 79 A 15.350 15.500 14.520 14.670 0.15 RHS
95. NH 79 A 16.350 16.550 15.520 15.720 0.20 RHS
96. NH 79 A 18.750 25.000 17.920 24.170 6.25 RHS
97. NH 79 A 28.200 29.400 27.370 28.570 1.20 RHS
98. NH 79 A 30.050 32.000 29.220 31.170 1.95 RHS
99. NH 79 A 32.800 36.100 31.970 35.270 3.30 RHS
100. NH 79 15.000 15.100 35.270 35.370 0.10 RHS
101. NH 79 16.650 20.600 36.920 40.870 3.95 RHS
102. NH 79 23.000 24.050 43.270 44.320 1.05 RHS
103. NH 79 28.550 29.800 48.820 50.070 1.25 RHS
104. NH 79 34.150 34.250 54.420 54.520 0.10 RHS
105. NH 79 35.400 35.500 55.670 55.770 0.10 RHS
106. NH 79 36.300 39.100 56.570 59.370 2.80 RHS
107. NH 79 39.875 40.350 60.145 60.620 0.48 RHS
108. NH 79 41.650 45.100 61.920 65.370 3.45 RHS
109. NH 79 48.150 49.450 68.420 69.720 1.30 RHS
110. NH 79 51.450 52.725 71.720 72.995 1.28 RHS
111. NH 79 54.750 56.100 75.020 76.370 1.35 RHS
112. NH 79 56.750 57.300 77.020 77.570 0.55 RHS
113. NH 79 58.950 63.150 79.220 83.420 4.20 RHS
114. NH 79 64.050 69.500 84.320 89.770 5.45 RHS
115. NH 79 71.350 71.450 91.620 91.720 0.10 RHS
116. NH 79 72.350 73.700 92.620 93.970 1.35 RHS
117. NH 79 74.900 75.800 95.170 96.070 0.90 RHS
118. NH 79 78.750 79.575 99.020 99.845 0.83 RHS

Rajasthan
No. From To From To
119. NH 79 79.950 80.325 100.220 100.595 0.38 RHS
120. NH 79 81.700 85.150 101.970 105.420 3.45 RHS
121. NH 79 86.750 87.750 107.020 108.020 1.00 RHS
122. NH 79 90.100 91.300 110.370 111.570 1.20 RHS
123. NH 79 93.900 96.000 114.170 116.270 2.10 RHS
124. NH 79 96.400 97.550 116.670 117.820 1.15 RHS
125. NH 79 99.775 100.500 120.045 120.770 0.725 RHS
126. NH 79 101.000 101.450 121.270 121.720 0.450 RHS
127. NH 79 102.450 102.550 122.720 122.820 0.10 RHS
128. NH 79 103.200 111.050 123.470 131.320 7.85 RHS
129. NH 79 112.500 118.600 132.770 138.870 6.10 RHS
130. NH 79 119.450 120.400 139.720 140.670 0.95 RHS
131. NH 79 122.550 123.375 142.820 143.645 0.83 RHS
132. NH 79 126.050 126.750 146.320 147.020 0.70 RHS
133. NH 79 128.300 134.900 148.570 155.170 6.60 RHS
134. NH 79 137.975 138.800 158.245 159.070 0.83 RHS
135. NH 79 141.750 153.850 162.020 174.120 12.10 RHS
136. NH 79 155.350 156.050 175.620 176.320 0.70 RHS
137. NH 79 158.650 159.750 178.920 180.020 1.10 RHS
138. NH 79 162.600 162.800 182.870 183.070 0.20 RHS
139. NH 79 163.900 164.000 184.170 184.270 0.10 RHS
Chittorgarh
140. 0.000 4.850 184.270 189.120 4.85 RHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
141. 8.300 8.300 192.570 192.570 0.00 RHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
142. 9.200 11.650 193.470 195.920 2.45 RHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
143. 17.300 18.150 201.570 202.420 0.85 RHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
144. 18.750 19.050 203.020 203.320 0.30 RHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
145. 19.950 24.750 204.220 209.020 4.80 RHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
146. 26.250 27.150 210.520 211.420 0.90 RHS
Bypass
Chittorgarh
147. 29.300 29.600 213.570 213.870 0.30 RHS
Bypass
148. NH - 76 213.000 212.000 213.870 214.870 1.00 RHS
149. NH - 76 209.500 207.550 217.370 219.320 1.95 RHS
150. NH - 76 205.900 205.400 220.970 221.470 0.50 RHS
151. NH - 76 203.050 200.950 223.820 225.920 2.10 RHS
152. NH - 76 199.500 199.000 227.370 227.870 0.50 RHS
153. NH - 76 196.250 192.700 230.620 234.170 3.55 RHS
154. NH - 76 191.600 183.700 235.270 243.170 7.90 RHS
155. NH - 76 182.800 181.600 244.070 245.270 1.20 RHS
156. NH - 76 180.700 180.075 246.170 246.795 0.63 RHS
157. NH - 76 178.750 178.600 248.120 248.270 0.15 RHS

Rajasthan
No. From To From To
158. NH - 76 177.250 176.550 249.620 250.320 0.70 RHS
159. NH - 76 173.000 172.800 253.870 254.070 0.20 RHS
160. NH - 76 170.400 166.800 256.155 259.755 3.60 RHS
161. NH - 76 164.050 160.200 262.505 266.355 3.85 RHS
162. NH - 76 158.650 158.550 267.905 268.005 0.10 RHS
163. NH - 76 157.850 157.750 268.705 268.805 0.10 RHS
164. NH - 76 157.050 155.650 269.505 270.905 1.40 RHS
165. NH - 76 152.300 151.700 274.255 274.855 0.60 RHS
166. NH - 76 147.050 146.450 279.505 280.105 0.60 RHS
167. NH - 76 144.400 138.100 282.155 288.455 6.30 RHS
168. NH - 76 136.600 134.600 289.955 291.955 2.00 RHS
169. NH - 76 132.500 119.500 294.055 307.055 13.00 RHS
170. NH - 76 119.000 117.300 307.555 309.255 1.70 RHS
Udaipur
171. 1.100 1.300 RHS
Bypass 310.505 310.705 0.200
Udaipur
172. 2.060 2.605 RHS
Bypass 311.465 312.010 0.545
Udaipur
173. 5.400 7.020 RHS
Bypass 314.805 316.425 1.620
Udaipur
174. 12.300 13.100 RHS
Bypass 321.705 322.505 0.800
Udaipur
175. 12.900 14.665 RHS
Bypass 322.305 324.070 1.765
Udaipur
176. 21.400 22.100 RHS
Bypass 330.805 331.505 0.700
2.5 Proposed Right of Way (ROW)
The proposed Right of Way (RoW) is minimum 60 m (in the entire length of project road
except where additional width is required for improvement of deficit geometrics and to
accommodate high hill cut slopes, truck lay bye, toll plaza and junction development if
any. The proposed Right of Way details are as given in Table 2.2.
Table 2.2: Proposed Right of Way (ROW)
Sl. Existing Chainage Design Chainage Length
Road ROW Side Remark
1. NH - 79A 0.830 9.670 0.000 8.840 8.840 60 - - -
2. NH - 79A 9.670 9.730 8.840 8.900 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
3. NH - 79A 9.730 20.250 8.900 19.420 10.520 60 - - -
Truck Lay
4. NH - 79A 20.250 20.550 19.420 19.720 0.300 100 LHS RHS
Bye
5. NH - 79A 20.550 21.770 19.720 20.940 1.220 60 - - -
6. NH - 79A 21.770 21.830 20.940 21.000 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
7. NH - 79A 21.830 31.550 21.000 30.720 9.720 60 - - -
Truck Lay
8. NH - 79A 31.550 31.850 30.720 31.020 0.300 80 - RHS
Bye
9. NH - 79A 31.850 35.550 31.020 34.720 3.700 60 - - -
Truck Lay
10. NH - 79A 35.550 35.850 34.720 35.020 0.300 80 LHS -
Bye

Rajasthan

11. NH - 79A 35.850 36.100 35.020 35.270 0.250 60 - - -
12. NH - 79 15.000 17.840 35.270 38.110 2.840 60 - - -
13. NH - 79 17.840 17.900 38.110 38.170 0.060 70 - RHS Bus Bay
14. NH - 79 17.870 17.930 38.140 38.200 0.060 70 LHS - Bus Bay
15. NH - 79 17.930 29.420 38.200 49.690 11.490 60 - - -
16. NH - 79 29.420 29.480 49.690 49.750 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
17. NH - 79 29.480 38.070 49.750 58.340 8.590 60 - - -
18. NH - 79 38.070 38.130 58.340 58.400 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
19. NH - 79 38.130 40.500 58.400 60.770 2.370 60 - - -
20. NH - 79 40.500 41.000 60.770 61.270 0.500 200 - - Toll Plaza
21. NH - 79 41.000 51.970 61.270 72.240 10.970 60 - - -
22. NH - 79 51.970 52.030 72.240 72.300 0.060 70 LHS - Bus Bay
23. NH - 79 52.030 52.470 72.300 72.740 0.440 60 - - -
24. NH - 79 52.470 52.530 72.740 72.800 0.060 70 - RHS Bus Bay
25. NH - 79 52.530 60.050 72.800 80.320 7.520 60 - - -
Truck Lay
26. NH - 79 60.050 60.350 80.320 80.620 0.300 100 LHS RHS
Bye
27. NH - 79 60.350 61.820 80.620 82.090 1.470 60 - - -
28. NH - 79 61.820 61.880 82.090 82.150 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
29. NH - 79 61.880 74.400 82.150 94.670 12.520 60 - - -
Truck Lay
30. NH - 79 74.400 74.700 94.670 94.970 0.300 80 LHS -
Bye
31. NH - 79 74.700 74.870 94.970 95.140 0.170 60 - - -
32. NH - 79 74.870 74.930 95.140 95.200 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
33. NH - 79 74.930 75.420 95.200 95.690 0.490 60 - - -
34. NH - 79 75.420 75.480 95.690 95.750 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
35. NH - 79 75.480 75.500 95.750 95.770 0.020 60 - - -
Truck Lay
36. NH - 79 75.500 75.800 95.770 96.070 0.300 80 - RHS
Bye
37. NH - 79 75.800 83.270 96.070 103.540 7.470 60 - - -
38. NH - 79 83.270 83.330 103.540 103.600 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
39. NH - 79 83.330 87.470 103.600 107.740 4.140 60 - - -
40. NH - 79 87.470 87.530 107.740 107.800 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
41. NH - 79 87.530 94.320 107.800 114.590 6.790 60 - - -
42. NH - 79 94.320 94.380 114.590 114.650 0.060 70 - RHS Bus Bay
43. NH - 79 94.380 94.720 114.650 114.990 0.340 60 - - -
44. NH - 79 94.720 94.780 114.990 115.050 0.060 70 LHS - Bus Bay
45. NH - 79 94.780 100.090 115.050 120.360 5.310 60 - - -
46. NH - 79 100.090 100.150 120.360 120.420 0.060 70 - RHS Bus Bay
47. NH - 79 100.150 100.350 120.420 120.620 0.200 60 - - -
48. NH - 79 100.350 100.410 120.620 120.680 0.060 70 LHS - Bus Bay
49. NH - 79 100.410 100.500 120.680 120.770 0.090 60 - - -
50. NH - 79 100.500 101.000 120.770 121.270 0.500 200 - - Toll Plaza
51. NH - 79 101.000 101.570 121.270 121.840 0.570 60 - - -
NH - 79 Truck Lay
52. 101.570 101.870 100 LHS RHS
121.840 122.140 0.300 Bye
53. NH - 79 101.870 104.510 122.140 124.780 2.640 60 - - -

Rajasthan

54. NH - 79 104.510 104.570 124.780 124.840 0.060 70 - RHS Bus Bay
55. NH - 79 104.570 104.580 124.840 124.850 0.010 60 - - -
56. NH - 79 104.580 104.640 124.850 124.910 0.060 70 LHS - Bus Bay
57. NH - 79 104.640 107.420 124.910 127.690 2.780 60 - - -
58. NH - 79 107.420 107.480 127.690 127.750 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
59. NH - 79 107.480 108.115 127.750 128.385 0.635 60 - - -
Truck Lay
60. NH - 79 108.115 108.415 128.385 128.685 0.300 100 LHS RHS
Bye
61. NH - 79 108.415 122.845 128.685 143.115 14.430 60 - - -
62. NH - 79 122.845 122.905 143.115 143.175 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
63. NH - 79 122.905 127.970 143.175 148.240 5.065 60 - - -
64. NH - 79 127.970 128.030 148.240 148.300 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
65. NH - 79 128.030 134.250 148.300 154.520 6.220 60 - - -
Truck Lay
66. NH - 79 134.250 134.550 154.520 154.820 0.300 100 LHS RHS
Bye
67. NH - 79 134.550 138.365 154.820 158.635 3.815 60 - - -
68. NH - 79 138.365 138.425 158.635 158.695 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
69. NH - 79 138.425 150.550 158.695 170.820 12.125 60 - - -
Truck Lay
70. NH - 79 150.550 150.850 170.820 171.120 0.300 100 LHS RHS
Bye
71. NH - 79 150.850 163.450 171.120 183.720 12.600 60 - - -
72. NH - 79 163.450 163.950 183.720 184.220 0.500 200 - - Toll Plaza
73. NH - 79 163.950 164.000 184.220 184.270 0.050 60 - - -
Chittorgarh
74. 0.000 0.920 184.270 185.190 0.920 60 - - -
Bypass
Chittorgarh
75. 0.920 0.980 185.190 185.250 0.060 70 - RHS Bus Bay
Bypass
Chittorgarh
76. 0.980 1.020 185.250 185.290 0.040 60 - - -
Bypass
Chittorgarh
77. 1.020 1.080 185.290 185.350 0.060 70 LHS - Bus Bay
Bypass
Chittorgarh
78. 1.080 9.270 185.350 193.540 8.190 60 - - -
Bypass
Chittorgarh
79. 9.270 9.330 193.540 193.600 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
Bypass
Chittorgarh
80. 9.330 20.270 193.600 204.540 10.940 60 - - -
Bypass
Chittorgarh
81. 20.270 20.330 204.540 204.600 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
Bypass
Chittorgarh
82. 20.330 28.350 204.600 212.620 8.020 60 - - -
Bypass
Chittorgarh Truck Lay
83. 28.350 28.650 212.620 212.920 0.300 80 - RHS
Bypass Bye
Chittorgarh
84. 28.650 29.600 212.920 213.870 0.950 60 - - -
Bypass
85. NH - 76 213.000 212.550 213.870 214.320 0.450 60 - - -
Truck Lay
86. NH - 76 212.550 212.250 214.320 214.620 0.300 100 LHS RHS
Bye
87. NH - 76 212.250 205.430 214.620 221.440 6.820 60 - - -
88. NH - 76 205.430 205.370 221.440 221.500 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay

Rajasthan

89. NH - 76 205.370 194.530 221.500 232.340 10.840 60 - - -
90. NH - 76 194.530 194.470 232.340 232.400 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
91. NH - 76 194.470 185.630 232.400 241.240 8.840 60 - - -
92. NH - 76 185.630 185.570 241.240 241.300 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
93. NH - 76 185.570 180.730 241.300 246.140 4.840 60 - - -
94. NH - 76 180.730 180.670 246.140 246.200 0.060 70 - RHS Bus Bay
95. NH - 76 180.670 180.430 246.200 246.440 0.240 60 - - -
96. NH - 76 180.430 180.370 246.440 246.500 0.060 70 LHS - Bus Bay
97. NH - 76 180.370 172.850 246.500 254.020 7.520 60 - - -
Mangalwar
98. 0.000 2.065 254.020 256.085 2.065 60 - - -
Realignment
99. NH – 76 170.470 166.050 256.085 260.505 4.420 60 - - -
100. NH – 76 166.050 165.550 260.505 261.005 0.500 200 - - Toll Plaza
101. NH – 76 165.550 143.950 261.005 282.605 21.600 60 - - -
Truck Lay
102. NH – 76 143.950 143.650 282.605 282.905 0.300 100 LHS RHS
Bye
103. NH – 76 143.650 141.980 282.905 284.575 1.670 60 - - -
104. NH – 76 141.980 141.920 284.575 284.635 0.060 80 LHS RHS Bus Bay
105. NH – 76 141.920 117.150 284.635 309.405 24.770 60 - - -
Udaipur
106. 0.000 1.480 309.405 310.885 1.480 60 - - -
Bypass
Udaipur
107. 1.480 5.550 310.885 314.955 4.070 90 - - -
Bypass
Udaipur
108. 5.550 6.050 314.955 315.455 0.500 200 - - Toll Plaza
Bypass
Udaipur Truck Lay
109. 6.050 6.350 315.455 315.755 0.300 100 LHS RHS
Bypass Bye
Udaipur
110. 6.350 6.570 315.755 315.975 0.220 90 - - -
Bypass
Udaipur
111. 6.570 6.630 315.975 316.035 0.060 90 LHS RHS Bus Bay
Bypass
Udaipur
112. 6.630 11.170 316.035 320.575 4.540 90 - - -
Bypass
Udaipur
113. 11.170 11.230 320.575 320.635 0.060 90 LHS RHS Bus Bay
Bypass
Udaipur
114. 11.230 23.780 320.635 333.185 12.550 90 - - -
Bypass
2.6 At Grade Junctions
All at grade junctions will be improved during six laning of the project road. Details
major junctions improvements are as given in Table 2.3.
Table 2.3: Major Junctions (On cross roads at the location of Flyovers/Underpasses) to be
Improved
Sl. No. Road Existing Chainage Design Chainage Remarks
(km) (km)
1 NH-79A 3.519 2.689 4-Leged
2 NH-79A 4.350 3.520 4-Leged
3 NH-79A 4.810 3.980 3-Leged
4 NH-79A 5.386 4.556 3-Leged

Rajasthan

(km) (km)
5 NH-79A 5.750 4.920 4-Leged
6 NH-79A 22.100 21.270 4-Leged
7 NH-79A 28.700 27.870 4-Leged
8 NH-79A 34.925 34.095 3-Leged
9 NH 79 19.250 39.520 4-Leged
10 NH 79 37.900 58.170 4-Leged
11 NH 79 39.902 60.172 3-Leged
12 NH 79 61.400 81.670 4-Leged
13 NH 79 64.600 84.870 3-Leged
14 NH 79 94.625 114.895 4-Leged
15 NH 79 96.200 116.470 4-Leged
16 NH 79 113.775 134.045 4-Leged
17 NH 79 116.400 136.670 3-Leged
18 NH 79 118.050 138.320 3-Leged
19 NH 79 120.000 140.270 3-Leged
20 NH 79 128.914 149.184 3-Leged
21 NH 79 143.000 163.270 3-Leged
22 NH 79 147.200 167.470 3-Leged
23 NH 79 153.400 173.670 4-Leged
24 Chittorgarh Bypass 1.950 186.220 4-Leged
35 NH - 76 186.950 239.920 4-Leged
36 NH - 76 180.400 246.470 4-Leged
37 NH - 76 172.850 254.020 4-Leged
38 NH - 76 170.300 256.255 3-Leged
39 NH - 76 161.250 265.305 4-Leged
40 NH - 76 134.800 291.755 3-Leged
41 NH - 76 129.260 297.295 3-Leged
42 NH - 76 126.800 299.755 4-Leged
43 NH - 76 121.525 305.030 3-Leged
44 NH - 76 119.661 306.894 3-Leged
45 NH - 76 117.750 308.805 4-Leged
46 Udaipur Bypass 1.060 310.465 4-Leged

Rajasthan

(km) (km)
Details major junctions improvements on service roads are as given in Table 2.4.
Table 2.4: Minor Junctions (on Service Road) to be improved
Sl. Road Existing Design Side
No Chainage Chainage LHS RHS
(km) (km)
1. NH-79A 1.300 0.470 - -
2. NH-79A 6.150 5.320 Gita Vihar Kishangarh
3. NH-79A 7.600 6.770 - -
Access To
4. NH-79A 8.625 7.795 -
Village
5. NH-79A 9.800 8.970 - -
6. NH-79A 11.585 10.755 - -
7. NH-79A 14.000 13.170 - -
8. NH-79A 15.410 14.580 Tikawada -
Access To
9. NH-79A 17.630 16.800 -
Village
10. NH-79A 19.200 18.370 - -
11. NH-79A 21.150 20.320 - Srinagar
Srinagar/Ajme
12. NH-79A 22.100 21.270 Farkia
r
13. NH-79A 24.620 23.790 Bir Kanakheri
14. NH-79A 25.600 24.770 - -
15. NH-79A 26.525 25.695 - -
16. NH-79A 28.720 27.890 Bir Labeda
17. NH-79A 30.000 29.170 - -
Access To
18. NH-79A 31.000 30.170 -
Village
19. NH-79A 33.000 32.170 - -
20. NH-79A 36.000 35.170 - -
21. NH-79 16.700 36.970 Ramsar Nasirabad
22. NH-79 19.225 39.495 Kota Nasirabsd
Access To
23. NH-79 20.960 41.230 -
Village
24. NH-79 22.600 42.870 - -
25. NH-79 23.800 44.070 - Motipura
26. NH-79 29.000 49.270 Rasulpur -
27. NH-79 31.225 51.495 - Niara/Bagsuri
28. NH-79 33.060 53.330 Mangri -
29. NH-79 34.220 54.490 - Dhola Data
30. NH-79 35.450 55.720 Baghrai -
31. NH-79 36.775 57.045 - Niara
32. NH-79 41.050 61.320 - -
Access To
33. NH-79 42.800 63.070 -
Village
34. NH-79 45.625 65.895 - -
35. NH-79 47.450 67.720 - -

Rajasthan

(km) (km)
Singawal/Go
36. NH-79 48.575 68.845 Rathankot
palpur
37. NH-79 50.050 70.320 - -
Hiyaliya
38. NH-79 52.100 72.370 -
Gaon
39. NH-79 53.650 73.920 - -
40. NH-79 55.650 75.920 Sikhorani Satana
41. NH-79 57.200 77.470 Satkuria Satana
42. NH-79 59.400 79.670 Vijaynagar Maruda
43. NH-79 60.375 80.645 - Badi Ka Mataji
44. NH-79 61.400 81.670 Vijaynagar Biyawar
45. NH-79 62.450 82.720 - -
46. NH-79 63.180 83.450 - -
47. NH-79 64.600 84.870 Gulabpura -
48. NH-79 66.400 86.670 - -
49. NH-79 67.625 87.895 Baral Kharilamba
50. NH-79 69.400 89.670 Baral Adarshnagar
Access To
51. NH-79 70.400 90.670 -
Village
52. NH-79 71.400 91.670 - Taswaria
53. NH-79 73.650 93.920 - Madera Gaon
54. NH-79 75.275 95.545 Rupaheli Barasani/Asin
55. NH-79 77.000 97.270 - -
Apliyas/Nag
56. NH-79 79.300 99.570 -
aji Ka Kheda
Access To Access To
57. NH-79 80.200 100.470
Village Village
58. NH-79 83.950 104.220 - Govindpura
Access To
59. NH-79 85.100 105.370 -
Village
60. NH-79 87.380 107.650 Kundia Sareli/Kalia
Access To
61. NH-79 89.000 109.270 -
Village
62. NH-79 90.950 111.220 Dhunwalia Dhunwalia
Access To
63. NH-79 93.225 113.495 -
Village
64. NH-79 94.620 114.890 Raila Eras
65. NH-79 97.210 117.480 - -
Access To
66. NH-79 98.850 119.120 -
Village
67. NH-79 100.230 120.500 Lambia Kala Lambia Station
Access To
68. NH-79 101.250 121.520 Lambia Station
Village
69. NH-79 103.590 123.860 Jaswantpura Aali Nagar
70. NH-79 104.250 124.520 Balesharia -
Sanga Ka
71. NH-79 106.215 126.485 -
Kheda
72. NH-79 107.410 127.680 Balesharia Nanakpura

Rajasthan

(km) (km)
73. NH-79 107.950 128.220 - -
Neem Ka
74. NH-79 109.990 130.260 -
Kheda
75. NH-79 110.650 130.920 Piyara Gaon Danta Gaon
76. NH-79 112.800 133.070 - -
Raghunatpur
77. NH-79 113.770 134.040 Raisinghpura
a
78. NH-79 115.600 135.870 - -
79. NH-79 116.380 136.650 Shahpura -
80. NH-79 117.125 137.395 - -
81. NH-79 118.050 138.320 - Mandal
82. Bhilwara Bypass 3.000 143.270 Malola Dhul Kheera
83. Bhilwara Bypass 6.410 146.680 - Suraj Gaon
84. Bhilwara Bypass 8.000 148.270 - -
85. Bhilwara Bypass 9.625 149.895 - Meja Dam
86. Bhilwara Bypass 10.650 150.920 - Hathi Bhata
Lakhimpur/Sa
87. Bhilwara Bypass 12.250 152.520 Bhilwara
lara
88. Bhilwara Bypass 14.650 154.920 Field Pur
89. Bhilwara Bypass 16.110 156.380 - -
90. Bhilwara Bypass 18.550 158.820 Atun Kanoli
91. Bhilwara Bypass 21.800 162.070 - -
Access to
92. NH-79 138.700 163.970 -
Factory
Access to
93. NH-79 140.400 165.670 -
Factory
Biliya
94. NH-79 142.200 167.470 Saurabh Ganj
Kalan/RIICO
95. NH-79 143.330 168.600 - -
96. NH-79 144.500 169.770 - Kanya Kheri
97. NH-79 146.100 171.370 - Badoli
98. NH-79 148.420 173.690 Hamirgarh Takatpura
99. NH-79 153.100 178.370 - Ganeshpura
100. NH-79 157.730 183.000 Hamirgarh -
101. Chittorgarh Bypass 0.050 184.320 - -
103. Chittorgarh Bypass 8.280 192.550 Deta Village
104. Chittorgarh Bypass 9.650 193.920 - Medikheda
Access to
106. NH-76 212.000 214.870 -
Village
Access to
107. NH-76 209.600 217.270 -
Village
Ghosunda
108. NH-76 207.820 219.050 -
Dam
109. NH-76 205.500 221.370 Panch Devla Sarla Gaon
110. NH-76 199.980 226.890 - Dewas
111. NH-76 198.800 228.070 - -

Rajasthan

(km) (km)
112. NH-76 197.350 229.520 Dhutia Gaon -
Access to
113. NH-76 196.200 230.670 Bansen
Village
Access to
114. NH-76 195.300 231.570 -
Village
Access to
115. NH-76 194.600 232.270 Bansen
Village
116. NH-76 190.400 236.470 Bhadesar Sani Maharaj
117. NH-76 189.400 237.470 - Bagund
118. NH-76 188.375 238.495 - -
Access to
119. NH-76 185.300 241.570 -
Village
Access to
120. NH-76 183.950 242.920 -
Village
Access to
121. NH-76 182.700 244.170 -
Village
Khokhiya
122. NH-76 181.840 245.030 -
Kheda
123. NH-76 180.400 246.470 Ghora Kheda Napanya Gaon
124. NH-76 178.700 248.170 - -
125. NH-76 177.000 249.870 Lothiyana Sangasera
126. NH-76 175.500 251.370 Chakliyan -
127. NH-76 174.400 252.470 Palkheri -
128. NH-76 172.890 253.980 - -
129. NH-76 170.300 256.255 - -
Access to
130. NH-76 168.600 257.955 Binder
Village
131. NH-76 167.250 259.305 - Titarda
132. NH-76 166.200 260.355 - -
133. NH-76 164.020 262.535 - Narayanpura
134. NH-76 162.400 264.155 Negadia Hariya Kheri
135. NH-76 161.250 265.305 Bindal Nilkanth
Dangi Ka
136. NH-76 159.200 267.355 -
Khera
137. NH-76 155.950 270.605 Vana Barodia
138. NH-76 154.685 271.870 Soniyana Bindolia
139. NH-76 154.025 272.530 Tahawas -
Access to
140. NH-76 152.800 273.755 -
Village
141. NH-76 152.000 274.555 - -
142. NH-76 151.975 274.580 - -
Towards
143. NH-76 150.800 275.755 -
Helipet
144. NH-76 149.050 277.505 - -
145. NH-76 147.950 278.605 - -
146. NH-76 146.750 279.805 Kheroda Newania
147. NH-76 145.800 280.755 - -
148. NH-76 144.100 282.455 - -

Rajasthan

(km) (km)
Bansi/Ghiriy
149. NH-76 142.800 283.755 -
awadi
Bhatewar/Bi
150. NH-76 141.820 284.735 Balabnagar
nder
151. NH-76 140.675 285.880 Bhatewar -
Access to
152. NH-76 138.200 288.355 Bhutpura Gaon
Village
Access to
153. NH-76 137.300 289.255 Dawa Dimra
Village
154. NH-76 136.400 290.155 - -
Bhamrasiya
155. NH-76 135.500 291.055 -
Gaon
Maharaj Ki
156. NH-76 132.270 294.285 Mandesar
Kheri
157. NH-76 131.400 295.155 - -
158. NH-76 130.470 296.085 - Balab Nagar
Access to
159. NH-76 129.250 297.305 Udaipur -
Airport
Access to
160. NH-76 128.050 298.505 -
Village
161. NH-76 127.150 299.405 - -
162. NH-76 125.400 301.155 - -
163. NH-76 124.700 301.855 - Moti Khera
164. NH-76 121.525 305.030 - Khemli
165. NH-76 120.700 305.855 Kurabad -
Udaipur
166. NH-76 117.800 308.755 -
Bypass
167. NH-76 117.200 309.355 - -
168. Udaipur Bypass 0.800 310.205 Chittorgarh Udaipur
169. Udaipur Bypass 4.115 313.520 Jhamar Kotra Maadari
170. Udaipur Bypass 8.130 317.535 Jhamar Kotra Udaipur
171. Udaipur Bypass 12.675 322.080 Jaisamand Udaipur
2.7 Proposed Grade Separated Structures (Flyovers) / Interchanges

Details of proposed grade separated structure (flyovers)/interchanges in the six lane
project are as given in Table 2.5.
Table 2.5: Details of Proposed Grade Separated Structure (Flyovers) / Interchanges
Sl. Road Existing Design No of Proposed Proposed Total
No. Chainage Chainage Intersecting Structural Span Width
(km) (km) Road Configuration (m)
1. NH 79A 5.750 4.920 2 6 Lane Flyover 3 x 30.0 2x13.4
2. NH 79 19.250 39.520 2 6 Lane Flyover 5 x 30.0 2x13.4

Rajasthan
Sl. Road Existing Design No of Proposed Proposed Total

No. Chainage Chainage Intersecting Structural Span Width
(km) (km) Road Configuration (m)
6 Lane Flyover
Udaipur 0.725 to 310.130 to 1x45 +
8. 2 cum ROB @ 2x13.4
Bypass 1.130 310.535 12x30
1.060
6 Lane Viaduct
Udaipur 7.800 to 317.205 to
9. 2 cum ROB @ 40x30 2x13.4
Bypass 9.000 318.405
8.440
Udaipur
10. 12.685 322.090 2 6 Lane Flyover 1x30 2x13.4
Bypass
Udaipur 22.595 to 332.000 to
11. 2 6 Lane Flyover 12x30+1x45 2x13.4
Bypass 23.000 332.405
2.8 Interchanges
In the proposed six laning of the project road, interchanges have been provided as per
details given in Table 2.6:
Table 2.6: Interchanges
Sl. Road Existing Design No of Description
No. Chainage Chainage Intersecting
(km) (km) Road
1 NH 76 117.750 308.805 2 At the start of Udaipur Bypass
2 NH 8 286.730 332.915 2 At the end of Udaipur Bypass
2.9 Rehabilitation / Repair of Existing Elevated Structures

During six laning of the project road, existing elevated structures will be
rehabilitated/repaired as per details given in Table 2.7:
Table 2.7: Rehabilitation / Repair of Existing Elevated Structures
Proposed
Structure
Structura
Configur
Arrang
Sl. Road Existing Design Length Total Remarks

ement
Type
Span
(m)
No. Chainag Chainag (m) Width

l
e (km) e (km) (m)

Clear/
Replace
RCC T-
Existing Drainage
1 NH-79A 34.925 34.095 Beam 6x15+2x22 134.0 12.5
Structure Spouts,
Girder
Replace
wearing coat
All the
necessary
19 x2 + repairs and
RCC T- 6x20 + rehabilitation
Existing Girder + 1x24.290 + works are to
2 NH-8 400.583 446.768 443.04 7.5
Structure PSC Box 1x46.6 + be carried out
Girder 1x14.15 + as per the
10x20 guidelines of
IRC SP 87:
2010
2.10 Details of Proposed and Existing Vehicular Underpasses
In the proposed six laning of the project road, vehicular underpasses have been
provided as per details given in Table 2.8:

Rajasthan
Table 2.8: Details of Proposed Vehicular Underpasses

Sl. Road Existing Design Chainage Proposed Proposed
No. Chainage (km) (km) Structure Size (L x H)
Type (m)
1. NH 79 A 22.100 21.270 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
2. NH 79 A 28.700 27.870 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
3. NH 79 61.400 81.670 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
4. NH 79 64.600 84.870 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
5. NH 79 94.625 114.895 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
6. NH 79 113.775 134.045 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
7. NH 79 116.400 136.670 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
8. NH 79 118.050 138.320 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
9. NH 79 147.200 167.470 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
10. NH 79 153.400 173.670 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
11. Chittorgarh Bypass 1.950 186.220 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
12. Chittorgarh Bypass 9.650 193.920 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
13. NH – 76 186.950 239.920 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
14. NH - 76 180.400 246.470 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
15. NH – 76 172.850 254.020 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
16. NH – 76 170.300 256.255 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
17. NH – 76 161.250 265.305 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
18. NH – 76 134.800 291.755 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
19. NH – 76 121.525 305.030 RCC Box 2x12x5.5
20. Udaipur Bypass 4.115 313.520 RCC Box 1x12x5.5
Existing vehicular underpasses will be widened during six laning of the project road as
per details given in Table 2.9:
Table 2.9: Details of Vehicular Underpasses To Be Widened
Sn. Chainage Package Existing Proposed Remarks
1 29.500 Chittorgarh Existing Structure At the end of Chittorgarh
Bypass Underpass shall be bypass Grade Separator is
is having widen to 3 under construction, one leg is
two lane Lane having two lane capacity, the
capacity Capacity same shall be widen to three
lane capacity
2.11 Details of Proposed Pedestrian Underpasses
For crossing of pedestrian and cattle, pedestrian underpasses have been provided as per
Table 2.10: Details of Proposed Pedestrian Underpasses
Sl. Existing Chainage Design Chainage Proposed Size (L x
Road
No. (km) (km) H) (m)
1. NH 79 A 1.300 0.470 7x3
2. NH 79 A 7.325 6.495 7x3
3. NH 79 A 8.300 7.470 7x3
4. NH 79 A 9.500 8.670 7x3
5. NH 79 A 12.075 11.245 7x3
6. NH 79 A 15.425 14.595 7x3

Rajasthan

Road
7. NH 79 A 24.625 23.795 7x3
8. NH 79 A 31.400 30.570 7x3
9. NH 79 A 33.750 32.920 7x3
10. NH 79 17.000 37.270 7x3
11. NH 79 23.800 44.070 7x3
12. NH 79 29.000 49.270 7x3
13. NH 79 42.800 63.070 7x3
14. NH 79 44.200 64.470 7x3
15. NH 79 48.600 68.870 7x3
16. NH 79 52.100 72.370 7x3
17. NH 79 55.450 75.720 7x3
18. NH 79 57.200 77.470 7x3
19. NH 79 59.400 79.670 7x3
20. NH 79 62.250 82.520 7x3
21. NH 79 67.625 87.895 7x3
22. NH 79 69.400 89.670 7x3
23. NH 79 73.350 93.620 7x3
24. NH 79 75.275 95.545 7x3
25. NH 79 79.300 99.570 7x3
26. NH 79 83.950 104.220 7x3
27. NH 79 87.050 107.320 7x3
28. NH 79 89.025 109.295 7x3
29. NH 79 90.950 111.220 7x3
30. NH 79 96.700 116.970 7x3
31. NH 79 100.225 120.495 7x3
32. NH 79 101.250 121.520 7x3
33. NH 79 103.575 123.845 7x3
34. NH 79 104.250 124.520 7x3
35. NH 79 107.425 127.695 7x3
36. NH 79 109.975 130.245 7x3
37. NH 79 123.025 143.295 7x3
38. NH 79 134.650 154.920 7x3
39. NH 79 138.550 158.820 7x3
40. NH 79 141.800 162.070 7x3
41. NH 79 143.700 163.970 7x3
42. NH 79 145.400 165.670 7x3
43. NH 79 148.325 168.595 7x3
44. NH 79 151.100 171.370 7x3
45. NH 79 155.800 176.070 7x3
46. NH 79 158.100 178.370 7x3
47. NH 79 159.675 179.945 7x3
48. NH 79 162.700 182.970 7x3
49. Chittorgarh Bypass 0.100 184.370 7x3
50. NH – 76 209.300 217.570 7x3
51. NH – 76 205.700 221.170 7x3

Rajasthan

Road
52. NH – 76 204.350 222.520 7x3
53. NH – 76 201.000 225.870 7x3
54. NH – 76 193.200 233.670 7x3
55. NH – 76 190.400 236.470 7x3
56. NH – 76 183.950 242.920 7x3
57. NH – 76 182.700 244.170 7x3
58. NH – 76 178.700 248.170 7x3
59. NH – 76 177.025 249.845 7x3
60. NH – 76 175.500 251.370 7x3
Mangalwar 7x3
61. 1.070 255.090
Realignment
62. NH – 76 168.600 257.955 7x3
63. NH – 76 166.200 260.355 7x3
64. NH – 76 159.200 267.355 7x3
65. NH – 76 155.950 270.605 7x3
66. NH - 76 152.200 274.355 7x3
67. NH – 76 146.750 279.805 7x3
68. NH – 76 141.800 284.755 7x3
69. NH – 76 136.500 290.055 7x3
70. NH – 76 132.275 294.280 7x3
71. NH – 76 128.050 298.505 7x3
72. NH – 76 125.400 301.155 7x3
73. NH – 76 123.100 303.455 7x3
74. NH – 76 120.700 305.855 7x3
75. Udaipur Bypass 2.420 311.825 7x3
76. Udaipur Bypass 6.375 315.780 7x3
77. Udaipur Bypass 10.225 319.630 7x3
78. Udaipur Bypass 12.900 322.305 7x3
79. Udaipur Bypass 21.410 330.815 7x4.5
2.12 Major and Minor Bridges
2.12.1 Construction of Additional Major Bridges

During six laning of the project road additional major bridges will be constructed as per
Table 2.11: Construction of Additional Major Bridges
Sl. Road/ Existing Design Type of Proposed Total Length of
No. Name of Chainage Chainage Crossing Span Width of Bridge
Bridge (km) (km) Arrangement Structure
(c/c bridge) (m)
(m)
4x38.11+2 x
1 NH-79 63.500 83.770 River 11.70 226.6
37.1

Rajasthan
2.12.2 New Minor Bridges/ Minor Bridges to be Reconstructed

New minor bridges/ minor bridges will be reconstructed during 6 laning of the project
road as given in Table 2.12.
Table 2.12: New Minor Bridges/ Minor Bridges to be Reconstructed
Sl. Road/ Name of Existing Design Proposed Span Length of Total Width
No. Bridge Chainage Chainage Arrangement Bridge of Structure
(km) (km) (c/c bridge) (m) (m)
1 NH-79A 15.960 15.130 1 x 11.0 11 15.2
2 NH-79 30.007 50.277 1x12.4 12.4 15.2
3 NH-79 88.465 108.735 1x8.5 8.5 15.2
4 NH-79 101.678 121.948 1x14.25 14.25 15.2
5 NH-79 111.950 132.220 1x10.0 10 15.2
6 Udaipur Bypass 4.920 314.325 2x20 40 2x15.2
2.12.3 New Minor Bridges on Service Roads

In the project road, new minor bridges will be provided on service roads as per details
given in Table 2.13.
Table 2.13: New Minor Bridges on Service Road
Sl. Road/ Name of Existing Design Proposed Span Length of Total Width of
No. Bridge Chainage Chainage Arrangement Bridge Structure (m)
(km) (km) (c/c bridge) (m)
1 NH-79A 5.860 5.030 1 x 7.5 7.5 10.2
2 NH-79A 5.860 5.030 1 x 7.5 7.5 10.2
3 NH-79A 19.340 18.510 6 x 9.0 54 10.2
4 NH-79A 19.340 18.510 6 x 9.0 54 10.2
5 NH-79A 20.454 19.624 3 x 6.5 19.5 10.2
6 NH-79A 20.454 19.624 3 x 6.5 19.5 10.2
7 NH-79A 22.100 21.270 1 x 7.5 7.5 10.2
8 NH-79A 22.100 21.270 1 x 7.5 7.5 10.2
9 NH-79A 22.721 21.891 2 x 3.8 7.6 10.2
10 NH-79A 22.721 21.891 1 x 7.5 7.5 10.2
11 NH-79 19.120 39.390 2 x 10.7 21.4 10.2
12 NH-79 19.120 39.390 2 x 9.7 19.4 10.2
13 NH-79 59.651 79.921 3 x 8.0 24 10.2
14 NH-79 59.651 79.921 3 x 8.0 24 10.2
15 NH-79 83.514 103.784 1x9.4 9.4 10.2

Rajasthan
Sl. Road/ Name of Existing Design Proposed Span Length of Total Width of
No. Bridge Chainage Chainage Arrangement Bridge Structure (m)
(km) (km) (c/c bridge) (m)
16 NH-79 83.514 103.784 1x9.4 9.4 10.2
17 NH-79 84.216 104.486 1x 9.25 9.25 10.2
18 NH-79 84.216 104.486 1x 9.25 9.25 10.2
19 NH-79 90.568 110.838 1 x 7.4 7.4 10.2
20 NH-79 90.568 110.838 1 x 7.4 7.4 10.2
21 NH-79 109.226 129.496 3 x 4.5 13.5 10.2
22 NH-79 109.226 129.496 3 x 4.52 13.6 10.2
23 NH-79 116.480 136.750 2 x 7.4 14.8 10.2
24 NH-79 116.480 136.750 2 x 7.4 14.8 10.2
25 NH-79 118.350 138.620 3 x 6.0 18 10.2
26 NH-79 118.350 138.620 3 x 6.0 18 10.2
27 NH-79 129.915 150.185 2 x 6.98 13.96 10.2
28 NH-79 129.915 150.185 2 x 6.98 13.96 10.2
29 NH-79 132.683 152.953 3x7.0 21 10.2
30 NH-79 132.683 152.953 3x7.0 21 10.2
31 NH-79 133.572 153.842 5 x 7.0 35 10.2
32 NH-79 133.572 153.842 5 x 7.0 35 10.2
33 NH-79 143.920 164.190 4 x 9.3 37.2 10.2
34 NH-79 143.920 164.190 4 x 9.3 37.2 10.2
35 NH-79 150.550 170.820 3 x 10.4 31.2 10.2
36 NH-79 150.550 170.820 3 x 10.4 31.2 10.2
37 NH-79 158.700 178.970 1 x 8.8 8.8 10.2
38 NH-79 158.982 179.252 3 x 8.4 25.2 10.2
39 NH-76 179.740 247.130 1 x 8.3 8.3 10.2
40 NH-76 179.740 247.130 1 x 8.3 8.3 10.2
41 NH-76 163.453 263.102 2 x 5.4 10.8 10.2
42 NH-76 163.453 263.102 2 x 5.4 10.8 10.2
43 NH-76 139.913 286.642 1 x 7.4 7.4 10.2
44 NH-76 139.913 286.642 1 x 7.4 7.4 10.2
45 NH-76 132.200 294.355 4 x 9.0 36 10.2
46 NH-76 132.200 294.355 4 x 9.0 36 10.2
47 NH-76 130.746 295.809 3 x 5.4 16.2 10.2
48 NH-76 130.746 295.809 3 x 5.4 16.2 10.2
49 NH-76 125.300 301.255 1 x 7.4 7.4 10.2
50 NH-76 125.300 301.255 1 x 7.4 7.4 10.2
51 NH-76 123.400 303.155 1 x 6.0 6 10.2
52 NH-76 123.400 303.155 1 x 6.0 6 10.2
53 NH-76 118.325 308.230 1 x 6.0 6 10.2
54 NH-76 118.325 308.230 1 x 6.0 6 10.2

Rajasthan
2.12.4 Minor Bridges Proposed to be Widened

In the project road, existing minor bridges are proposed to be widened as per details
given in Table 2.14:
Table 2.14: Minor Bridges where Widening is Proposed
Road/ Existing Design Proposed Span
Length of Total Width of
Sl. No. Name of Chainage Chainage Arrangement
Bridge Structure (m)
Bridge (km) (km) (c/c bridge) (m)
1 NH 79 143.920 164.190 4 x 9.3 37.2 15.2
2 NH 79 158.700 178.970 1 x 8.8 8.8 15.2
3 NH 79 158.982 179.252 3 x 8.4 25.2 15.2
4 NH 76 165.720 260.835 2 x 8.5 17 15.2
Under the project road, minor bridges on service roads where widening is proposed are
given in Table 2.15.
Table 2.15: Minor Bridges on Service Road
Road/ Existing Design Proposed Span
Sl. Length of Total Width of
Name of Chainage Chainage Arrangement
No. Bridge Structure (m)
Bridge (km) (km) (c/c bridge) (m)
1 NH-76 187.383 239.487 1 x10 10 10.2
2 NH-76 187.383 239.487 1 x10 10 10.2
3 NH-76 128.918 297.637 2 x 6.4 12.8 10.2
4 NH-76 128.918 297.637 2 x 6.4 12.8 10.2
2.13 Improvement Proposals for Culverts

To maintain the drainage pattern and to facilitate free flow to runoff, culverts will be
constructed and widened during six laning of the project road as given in Table 2.15 to
Table 2.16:
Table 2.16: New Box/ Slab Culverts on the Project Road
Sl. Road Existing Design Details of Proposed
No. Chainage Chainage Structure
(km) (km) Type of Span
Culverts Arrangement
(m)
Mangalwar
1 0.500 254.520 Box 1x3x3
Realignment
Mangalwar
2 0.900 254.920 Box 1x3x3
Realignment
Mangalwar
3 1.500 255.520 Box 1x3x3
Realignment
4 Udaipur Bypass 1.850 311.255 Box 1x3x3

Rajasthan
Sl. Road Existing Design Details of Proposed

No. Chainage Chainage Structure
(km) (km) Type of Span
(m)
Table 2.17: Box/ Slab Culverts to be Widened

Existing Design Details of Proposed Structure
Sl.
Road Chainage Chainage Type of Span Arrangement
No.
(km) (km) Culverts (m)
1 NH 79 A 1.300 0.470 Slab 1 x 1.6 x 1.4
2 NH 79 A 1.700 0.870 Slab 1 x 3.2 x 2.3
3 NH 79 A 1.990 1.160 Slab 1 x 1.2 x 0.9
4 NH 79 A 2.100 1.270 Slab 1 x 1.4 x 1.2
5 NH 79 A 2.400 1.570 Slab 1 x 1.8 x 1.7
6 NH 79 A 3.950 3.120 Slab 1 x 5.1 x 5.0
7 NH 79 A 7.010 6.180 Slab 1 x 1.7 x 2.4
8 NH 79 A 7.400 6.570 Slab 1 x 1.4 x 3.2
9 NH 79 A 7.850 7.020 Slab 1 x 1.8 x 2.8
10 NH 79 A 8.300 7.470 Slab 1 x 1.9 x 1.3
11 NH 79 A 8.900 8.070 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.7
12 NH 79 A 9.900 9.070 Slab 1 x 1.6 x 2.0
13 NH 79 A 10.010 9.180 Slab 1 x 0.8 x 1.6
14 NH 79 A 11.000 10.170 Slab 1 x 2.8 x 2.8
15 NH 79 A 12.200 11.370 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 2.6
16 NH 79 A 13.500 12.670 Slab 1 x 3.1 x 1.9
17 NH 79 A 14.800 13.970 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 0.9
18 NH 79 A 16.100 15.270 Slab 1 x 1.7 x 1.4
19 NH 79 A 17.200 16.370 Slab 1 x 3.3 x 1.0
20 NH 79 A 18.300 17.470 Slab 1 x 2.3 x 2.0
21 NH 79 A 18.500 17.670 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 2.0
22 NH 79 A 18.700 17.870 Slab 1 x 2.9 x 2.2
23 NH 79 A 18.800 17.970 Slab 1 x 2.4 x 3.0
24 NH 79 A 18.900 18.070 Slab 1 x 2.9 x 1.3
25 NH 79 A 20.800 19.970 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 1.5
26 NH 79 A 22.300 21.470 Slab 1 x 1.6 x 1.2
27 NH 79 A 22.400 21.570 Box 1 x 2.0 x 1.5
28 NH 79 A 30.200 29.370 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 2.7
29 NH 79 A 33.200 32.370 Slab 1 x 4.5 x 2.0

Rajasthan

Sl.
No.
30 NH 79 A 34.500 33.670 Slab 1 x 5.1 x 3.3
31 NH 79 A 35.100 34.270 Slab 1 x 4.8 x 1.7
32 NH 79 15.010 40.280 Slab 1 x 3.2 x 2.3
33 NH 79 15.300 40.570 Slab 1 x 3.2 x 3.6
34 NH 79 15.600 40.870 Slab 1 x 3.1 x 2.5
35 NH 79 15.900 41.170 Slab 1 x 3.5 x 4.0
36 NH 79 16.250 41.520 Slab 1 x 3.2 x 4.1
37 NH 79 16.800 42.070 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 1.5
38 NH 79 17.200 42.470 Slab 1 x 2.3 x 1.7
39 NH 79 17.500 42.770 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 2.8
40 NH 79 18.200 43.470 Slab 1 x 2.9 x 1.5
41 NH 79 18.600 43.870 Slab 1 x 1.9 x 1.0
42 NH 79 18.700 43.970 Slab 1 x 5.6 x 1.0
43 NH 79 19.900 45.170 Slab 1 x 3.4 x 2.7
44 NH 79 20.200 45.470 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 2.2
45 NH 79 21.200 46.470 Slab 1 x 1.8 x 1.7
46 NH 79 21.300 46.570 Slab 1 x 3.2 x 1.5
47 NH 79 24.200 49.470 Slab 1 x 1.3 x 1.1
48 NH 79 24.700 49.970 Slab 1 x 4.4 x 1.6
49 NH 79 25.800 51.070 Slab 1 x 4.5 x 0.9
50 NH 79 26.100 51.370 Slab 1 x 4.6 x 0.9
51 NH 79 27.900 53.170 Slab 1 x 5.6 x 0.8
52 NH 79 28.700 53.970 Slab 1 x 4.8 x 0.5
53 NH 79 29.500 54.770 Slab 1 x 3.3 x 3.0
54 NH 79 30.420 55.690 Slab 1 x 2.2 x 2.7
55 NH 79 33.500 58.770 Slab 1 x 1.9 x 2.0
56 NH 79 36.200 61.470 Slab 1 x 4.1 x 4.6
57 NH 79 36.850 62.120 Slab 1 x 1.9 x 3.8
58 NH 79 39.100 64.370 Slab 1 x 2.4 x 2.6
59 NH 79 40.600 65.870 Box 1 x 3.2 x 2.1
60 NH 79 40.850 66.120 Slab 1 x 1.8 x 3.4
61 NH 79 45.010 70.280 Slab 1 x 2.2 x 3.3
62 NH 79 45.300 70.570 Slab 1 x 2.3 x 1.5
63 NH 79 46.000 71.270 Slab 1 x 4.2 x 1.7
64 NH 79 46.100 71.370 Slab 1 x 2.8 x 2.7
65 NH 79 46.600 71.870 Slab 1 x 2.3 x 1.3
66 NH 79 47.200 72.470 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 3.3
67 NH 79 51.200 76.470 Slab 1 x 1.7 x 1.3
68 NH 79 54.900 80.170 Slab 1 x 2.7 x 1.0
69 NH 79 55.950 81.220 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 1.6
70 NH 79 56.180 81.450 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 1.3
71 NH 79 56.850 82.120 Slab 1 x 2.4 x 1.2
72 NH 79 58.600 83.870 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 2.0
73 NH 79 58.850 84.120 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 1.2
74 NH 79 61.100 86.370 Slab 1 x 1.9 x 1.0
75 NH 79 62.200 87.470 Slab 1 x 1.2 x 2.3

Rajasthan

Sl.
No.
76 NH 79 63.300 88.570 Box 2 x 2.0 x 2.0
77 NH 79 69.200 94.470 Slab 2 x 4.5 x 1.0
78 NH 79 70.225 95.495 Slab 1 x 1.6 x 1.0
79 NH 79 70.500 95.770 Slab 1 x 1.1 x 0.8
80 NH 79 70.950 96.220 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 1.1
81 NH 79 71.075 96.345 Slab 1 x 1.9 x 0.8
82 NH 79 72.195 97.465 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 1.4
83 NH 79 72.322 97.592 Slab 1 x 3.7 x 1.6
84 NH 79 72.947 98.217 Slab 1 x 1.2 x 1.0
85 NH 79 73.285 98.555 Slab 1 x 1.2 x 1.0
86 NH 79 78.700 103.970 Slab 1 x 1.1 x 2.6
87 NH 79 80.260 105.530 Slab 1 x 2.6 x 2.1
88 NH 79 82.827 108.097 Box 1 x 5.0 x 3.5
89 NH 79 84.360 109.630 Box 1 x 3.0 x 3.0
90 NH 79 84.500 109.770 Slab 1 x 3.3 x 3.0
91 NH 79 85.507 110.777 Slab 1 x 1.8 x 0.8
92 NH 79 85.600 110.870 Slab 1 x 1.6 x 1.0
93 NH 79 85.615 110.885 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 1.0
94 NH 79 87.016 112.286 Box 1 x 3.0 x 2.5
95 NH 79 87.780 113.050 Slab 1 x 1.1 x 1.3
96 NH 79 89.342 114.612 Box 1 x 1.5 x 1.1
97 NH 79 89.722 114.992 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 2.0
98 NH 79 90.165 115.435 Slab 1 x 1.2 x 1.0
99 NH 79 90.282 115.552 Slab 1 x 1.6 x 1.2
100 NH 79 91.100 116.370 Slab 1 x 3.8 x 1.3
101 NH 79 92.583 117.853 Slab 1 x 1.6 x 1.5
102 NH 79 93.690 118.960 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.7
103 NH 79 93.970 119.240 Slab 1 x 4.4 x 3.0
104 NH 79 94.195 119.465 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 1.5
105 NH 79 95.280 120.550 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 2.9
106 NH 79 96.739 122.009 Slab 1 x 1.2 x 2.2
107 NH 79 98.253 123.523 Slab 1 x 1.2 x 1.2
108 NH 79 98.507 123.777 Slab 2 x 3.4 x 2.0
109 NH 79 99.037 124.307 Slab 2 x 6.0 x 0.9
110 NH 79 99.465 124.735 Slab 1 x 1.3 x 1.1
111 NH 79 102.188 127.458 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.2
112 NH 79 104.189 129.459 Slab 1 x 2.5 x 0.9
113 NH 79 105.675 130.945 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 0.8
114 NH 79 108.065 133.335 Slab 1 x 1.8 x 1.0
115 NH 79 108.859 134.129 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 1.5
116 NH 79 113.300 138.570 Box 2 x 6.6 x 2.0
117 NH 79 115.022 140.292 Slab 2 x 5.4 x 1.3
118 NH 79 123.845 149.115 Slab 1 x 6.0 x 2.7
119 NH 79 124.719 149.989 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 2.5
120 NH 79 127.087 152.357 Slab 1 x 3.6 x 3.3
121 NH 79 128.470 153.740 Slab 1 x 3.5 x 1.8

Rajasthan

Sl.
No.
122 NH 79 128.490 153.760 Slab 1 x 3.6 x 1.9
123 NH 79 128.955 154.225 Slab 1 x 6.0 x 3.0
124 NH 79 134.169 159.439 Slab 1 x 4.1 x 2.2
125 NH 79 135.837 161.107 Slab 1 x 2.2 x 2.1
126 NH 79 137.489 162.759 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 1.9
127 NH 79 138.165 163.435 Slab 1 x 5.0 x 2.2
128 NH 79 141.229 166.499 Slab 1 x 5.9 x 2.6
129 NH 79 143.778 169.048 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 1.2
130 NH 79 146.100 171.370 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 1.6
131 NH 79 146.950 172.220 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 1.2
132 NH 79 148.100 173.370 Slab 1 x 1.6 x 2.3
133 NH 79 148.700 173.970 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 2.2
134 NH 79 152.355 177.625 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 3.0
135 NH 79 154.936 180.206 Slab 1 x 3.5 x 2.0
136 NH 79 158.300 183.570 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 0.9
137 NH 79 158.800 184.070 Slab 1 x 1.8 x 1.0
138 NH 76 213.600 213.270 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 3.6
139 NH 76 211.700 215.170 Slab 1 x 2.5 x 1.9
140 NH 76 206.700 220.170 Slab 1 x 2.6 x 1.4
141 NH 76 199.900 226.970 Slab 1 x 4.5 x 3.5
142 NH 76 195.950 230.920 Box 2 x 4.6 x 4.3
143 NH 76 195.200 231.670 Slab 1 x 4.5 x 5.0
144 NH 76 184.800 242.070 Slab 1 x 3.1 x 2.7
145 NH 76 183.500 243.370 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 3.8
146 NH 76 178.200 248.670 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 1.3
147 NH 76 176.800 250.070 Slab 1 x 2.5 x 1.3
148 NH 76 170.920 255.950 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 3.0
149 NH 76 170.850 256.020 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 1.2
150 NH 76 170.100 256.455 Slab 1 x 6.0 x 1.2
151 NH 76 169.287 257.268 Slab 1 x 5.1 x 1.0
152 NH 76 167.800 258.755 Slab 1 x 2.2 x 1.7
153 NH 76 166.789 259.766 Slab 1 x 4.4 x 2.3
154 NH 76 166.700 259.855 Slab 1 x 5.0 x 2.8
155 NH 76 165.700 260.855 Slab 1 x 3.5 x 1.9
156 NH 76 165.513 261.042 Slab 1 x 5.0 x 2.8
157 NH 76 165.250 261.305 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 1.9
158 NH 76 164.760 261.795 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 3.0
159 NH 76 164.567 261.988 Slab 1 x 5.0 x 3.0
160 NH 76 163.500 263.055 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
161 NH 76 163.110 263.445 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
162 NH 76 163.100 263.455 Box 2 x 1.3 x 1.2
163 NH 76 162.980 263.575 Box 1 x 1.3 x 2.0
164 NH 76 162.700 263.855 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
165 NH 76 161.100 265.455 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
166 NH 76 160.100 266.455 Slab 1 x 6.0 x 2.0
167 NH 76 159.959 266.596 Slab 1 x 6.0 x 2.0

Rajasthan

Sl.
No.
168 NH 76 157.500 269.055 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 2.6
169 NH 76 157.250 269.305 Slab 1 x 5.7 x 3.1
170 NH 76 157.100 269.455 Slab 1 x 2.9 x 1.2
171 NH 76 156.820 269.735 Slab 1 x 3.1 x 1.9
172 NH 76 156.653 269.902 Slab 1 x 6.0 x 3.1
173 NH 76 155.224 271.331 Slab 1 x 3.1 x 1.2
174 NH 76 155.042 271.513 Slab 1 x 3.1 x 1.9
175 NH 76 154.385 272.170 Slab 1 x 5.0 x 2.1
176 NH 76 152.530 274.025 Slab 1 x 5.1 x 1.1
177 NH 76 151.330 275.225 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 2.1
178 NH 76 151.251 275.304 Box 1 x 1.5 x 1.8
179 NH 76 150.495 276.060 Slab 1 x 3.1 x 1.0
180 NH 76 149.270 277.285 Slab 1 x 3.1 x 1.0
181 NH 76 148.750 277.805 Slab 1 x 3.5 x 1.2
182 NH 76 148.400 278.155 Slab 1 x 1.6 x 0.9
183 NH 76 147.366 279.189 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.5
184 NH 76 147.081 279.474 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.5
185 NH 76 146.123 280.432 Box 1 x 1.5 x 1.5
186 NH 76 144.767 281.788 Slab 1 x 4.1 x 1.8
187 NH 76 143.025 283.530 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 4.1
188 NH 76 142.290 284.265 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 4.1
189 NH 76 141.400 285.155 Slab 1 x 3.1 x 2.9
190 NH 76 141.300 285.255 Slab 1 x 3.8 x 3.1
191 NH 76 141.130 285.425 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 4.1
192 NH 76 140.337 286.218 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.4
193 NH 76 139.744 286.811 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.4
194 NH 76 139.436 287.119 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 1.1
195 NH 76 137.200 289.355 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 1.6
196 NH 76 136.804 289.751 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 2.1
197 NH 76 135.961 290.594 Slab 1 x 4.2 x 2.9
198 NH 76 135.200 291.355 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 3.9
199 NH 76 134.821 291.734 Slab 1 x 1.3 x 1.0
200 NH 76 134.590 291.965 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.5
201 NH 76 134.473 292.082 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.5
202 NH 76 134.114 292.441 Slab 1 x 5.4 x 4.5
203 NH 76 133.936 292.619 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 3.0
204 NH 76 133.721 292.834 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.5
205 NH 76 133.090 293.465 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.5
206 NH 76 131.955 294.600 Slab 1 x 2.5 x 1.3
207 NH 76 131.800 294.755 Box 1 x 1.3 x 1.9
208 NH 76 130.746 295.809 Slab 1 x 3.8 x 1.5
209 NH 76 130.206 296.349 Box 1 x 3.0 x 2.5
210 NH 76 130.050 296.505 Slab 1 x 2.3 x 1.1
211 NH 76 129.970 296.585 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.5
212 NH 76 129.629 296.926 Slab 1 x 2.9 x 0.8
213 NH 76 128.380 298.175 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 2.5

Rajasthan

Sl.
No.
214 NH 76 127.770 298.785 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.5
215 NH 76 126.400 300.155 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 3.1
216 NH 76 126.220 300.335 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 1.3
217 NH 76 126.200 300.355 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 2.0
218 NH 76 125.797 300.758 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 2.5
219 NH 76 125.775 300.780 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 2.5
220 NH 76 125.642 300.913 Slab 1 x 1.0 x 1.1
221 NH 76 125.507 301.048 Slab 1 x 1.1 x 1.3
222 NH 76 125.383 301.172 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 2.5
223 NH 76 124.668 301.887 Box 1 x 2.2 x 1.6
224 NH 76 124.104 302.451 Slab 1 x 1.0 x 2.1
225 NH 76 123.873 302.682 Box 1 x 3.3 x 1.3
226 NH 76 122.741 303.814 Slab 1 x 2.2 x 1.6
227 NH 76 122.361 304.194 Slab 1 x 2.2 x 1.6
228 NH 76 122.126 304.429 Slab 1 x 3.3 x 1.3
229 NH 76 121.900 304.655 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 1.0
230 NH 76 120.304 306.251 Slab 1 x 2.6 x 2.5
231 NH 76 120.235 306.320 Slab 1 x 3.7 x 2.5
232 NH 76 119.800 306.755 Slab 1 x 2.9 x 2.0
233 NH 76 118.597 307.958 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 2.8
Table 2.18: Slab Culverts to be Reconstructed on the Project Road

Details of Proposed Structure
Sl. Existing Design
Road Type of Span Arrangement
No. Chainage (km) Chainage (km)
Culverts (m)
1 NH 79 A 1.200 0.370 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
2 NH 79 A 9.300 8.470 Slab 1 x 4.0 X 4.0
3 NH 79 A 15.500 14.670 Slab 1 x 5.0 x 0.9
4 NH 79 A 17.800 16.970 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 3.1
5 NH 79 A 19.100 18.270 Slab 1 x 3.2 x 1.3
6 NH 79 A 24.700 23.870 Slab 1 x 2.2 x 1.1
7 NH 79 A 28.400 27.570 Slab 1 x 4.3 x 1.4
8 NH 79 A 30.800 29.970 Slab 1 x 1.7 x 1.0
9 NH 79 29.400 54.670 Slab 1 x 4.5 x 0.5
10 NH 79 30.900 56.170 Slab 1 x 2.3 x 2.3
11 NH 79 33.300 58.570 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.3
12 NH 79 34.200 59.470 Slab 1 x 4.1 x 2.9
13 NH 79 37.600 62.870 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 2.4
14 NH 79 40.950 66.220 Slab 1 x 2.6 x 3.6
15 NH 79 43.300 68.570 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 3.1
16 NH 79 48.300 73.570 Slab 1 x 4.4 x 1.4
17 NH 79 48.500 73.770 Slab 1 x 1.7 x 1.0
18 NH 79 52.500 77.770 Slab 1 x 1.9 x 1.3
19 NH 79 55.400 80.670 Slab 1 x 2.7 x 1.9
20 NH 79 55.700 80.970 Slab 1 x 1.4 x 1.8
21 NH 79 57.300 82.570 Slab 1 x 5.1 x 2.3

Rajasthan

Sl. Existing Design
Culverts (m)
22 NH 79 67.800 93.070 Slab 1 x 1.0 x 1.2
23 NH 79 72.500 97.770 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.0
24 NH 79 77.043 102.313 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.0
25 NH 79 79.350 104.620 Slab 1 x 1.6 x 1.3
26 NH 79 79.455 104.725 Slab 1 x 1.1 x 1.3
27 NH 79 87.150 112.420 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 2.5
28 NH 79 88.680 113.950 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.2
29 NH 79 89.185 114.455 Slab 1 x 1.6 x 1.3
30 NH 79 90.750 116.020 Slab 1 x 3.4 x 3.0
31 NH 79 90.917 116.187 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 1.8
32 NH 79 94.340 119.610 Slab 1 x 2.6 x 2.2
33 NH 79 98.714 123.984 Slab 2 x 4.1 x 1.5
34 NH 79 100.069 125.339 Slab 1 x 1.7 x 1.9
35 NH 79 103.400 128.670 Slab 1 x 2.2 x 1.0
36 NH 79 103.598 128.868 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 1.3
37 NH 79 104.396 129.666 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.0
38 NH 79 115.429 140.699 Slab 1 x 1.4 x 0.8
39 NH 79 115.685 140.955 Slab 1 x 5.0 x 1.7
40 NH 79 129.502 154.772 Slab 1 x 4.1 x 3.9
41 NH 79 131.941 157.211 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 2.5
42 NH 79 134.796 160.066 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 1.7
43 NH 79 149.500 174.770 Slab 1 x 3.2 x 3.1
44 NH 79 151.441 176.711 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.5
45 NH 79 151.544 176.814 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 1.5
46 NH 79 153.557 178.827 Slab 1 x 1.5 x 1.5
47 NH 79 154.176 179.446 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 1.8
48 NH 79 158.100 183.370 Slab 1 x 3.4 x 0.5
49 NH 79 158.208 183.478 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 0.5
50 NH 76 208.100 218.770 Slab 1 x 2.5 x 1.2
51 NH 76 196.200 230.670 Slab 1 x 1.6 x 1.0
52 NH 76 191.500 235.370 Slab 1 x 2.3 x 2.6
53 NH 76 190.600 236.270 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 0.9
54 NH 76 178.800 248.070 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 1.3
55 NH 76 176.950 249.920 Slab 1 x 2.5 x 1.3
56 NH 76 171.200 255.670 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 1.2
57 NH 76 170.112 256.443 Slab 1 x 6.0 x 3.0
58 NH 76 168.772 257.783 Slab 1 x 5.0 x 2.1
59 NH 76 166.236 260.319 Slab 1 x 1.2 x 1.5
60 NH 76 164.367 262.188 Slab 1 x 3.5 x 2.2
61 NH 76 156.240 270.315 Slab 1 x 6.0 x 2.3
62 NH 76 155.710 270.845 Slab 1 x 6.0 x 2.3
63 NH 76 152.908 273.647 Slab 1 x 4.6 x 1.5
64 NH 76 152.200 274.355 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 0.9
65 NH 76 151.613 274.942 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 2.1
66 NH 76 150.959 275.596 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 2.1
67 NH 76 148.100 278.455 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 1.0

Rajasthan

Sl. Existing Design
Culverts (m)
68 NH 76 147.827 278.728 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 1.8
69 NH 76 141.600 284.955 Slab 1 x 2.1 x 1.4
70 NH 76 140.708 285.847 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 1.1
71 NH 76 140.549 286.006 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 2.3
72 NH 76 139.479 287.076 Slab 1 x 3.0 x 1.1
73 NH 76 135.400 291.155 Slab 1 x 4.0 x 2.1
74 NH 76 132.100 294.455 Slab 1 x 2.5 x 1.3
75 NH 76 126.978 299.577 Slab 1 x 5.0 x 1.7
76 NH 76 123.200 303.355 Slab 1 x 2.2 x 1.6
77 NH 76 121.602 304.953 Slab 1 x 3.8 x 3.0
78 NH 76 121.100 305.455 Slab 1 x 1.9 x 3.4
79 NH 76 118.325 308.230 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 2.8
80 NH 76 117.943 308.612 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 2.7
81 NH 76 117.524 309.031 Slab 1 x 2.0 x 2.7
Table 2.19: Pipe Culverts to be Reconstructed as a Box Culvert

Sl. Existing Design
Culverts (m)
1 NH 79 71.500 96.770 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
2 NH 79 73.960 99.230 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
3 NH 79 75.200 100.470 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
4 NH 79 79.922 105.192 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
5 NH 79 82.592 107.862 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
6 NH 79 82.862 108.132 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
7 NH 79 83.187 108.457 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
8 NH 79 84.196 109.466 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
9 NH 79 84.237 109.507 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
10 NH 79 99.895 125.165 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
11 NH 79 103.960 129.230 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
12 NH 79 104.454 129.724 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
13 NH 79 104.745 130.015 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
14 NH 79 104.795 130.065 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
15 NH 79 104.965 130.235 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
16 NH 79 107.350 132.620 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
17 NH 79 109.950 135.220 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
18 NH 79 110.600 135.870 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
19 NH 79 112.300 137.570 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
20 NH 79 112.400 137.670 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
21 NH 79 116.760 142.030 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
22 NH 79 116.980 142.250 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
23 NH 79 117.860 143.130 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
24 NH 79 120.358 145.628 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
25 NH 79 121.279 146.549 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
26 NH 79 121.482 146.752 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
27 NH 79 123.641 148.911 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0

Rajasthan

Sl. Existing Design
Culverts (m)
28 NH 79 123.706 148.976 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
29 NH 79 129.458 154.728 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
30 NH 79 129.572 154.842 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
31 NH 79 130.940 156.210 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
32 NH 79 131.087 156.357 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
33 NH 79 131.400 156.670 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
34 NH 79 131.515 156.785 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
35 NH 79 132.270 157.540 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
36 NH 79 132.490 157.760 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
37 NH 79 134.729 159.999 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
38 NH 79 135.140 160.410 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
39 NH 79 136.066 161.336 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
40 NH 79 137.016 162.286 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
41 NH 79 139.500 164.770 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
42 NH 79 140.771 166.041 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
43 NH 79 140.856 166.126 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
44 NH 79 141.792 167.062 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
45 NH 79 142.104 167.374 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
46 NH 79 142.393 167.663 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
47 NH 79 143.300 168.570 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
48 NH 76 177.600 249.270 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
49 NH 76 176.700 250.170 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
50 NH 76 176.300 250.570 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
51 NH 76 175.800 251.070 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
52 NH 76 175.750 251.120 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
53 NH 76 175.700 251.170 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
54 NH 76 175.300 251.570 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
55 NH 76 175.100 251.770 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
56 NH 76 174.800 252.070 Box 1 x 2.0 x 2.0
Table 2.20: Pipe Culverts to be Widened

Sl. Road Existing Design Details of Proposed Structure
No. Chainage (km) Chainage (km) Type of Span
(m)
1 NH 79 A 10.800 9.970 Pipe 2 x 1.2
2 NH 79 A 11.300 10.470 Pipe 1 x 1.2
3 NH 79 A 11.400 10.570 Pipe 1 x 1.2
4 NH 79 A 12.700 11.870 Pipe 1x1
5 NH 79 A 15.100 14.270 Pipe 1 x 1.2
6 NH 79 A 21.350 20.520 Pipe 2 x 1.2
7 NH 79 14.100 39.370 Pipe 1 x 1.2
8 NH 79 14.600 39.870 Pipe 2 x 1.2
9 NH 79 80.130 105.400 Pipe 1 x 1.2
10 NH 79 95.915 121.185 Pipe 3 x 1.2
11 NH 79 96.612 121.882 Pipe 1 x 1.5

Rajasthan

(m)
12 NH 79 117.915 143.185 Pipe 1x1
13 NH 79 119.413 144.683 Pipe 2 x 1.2
14 NH 79 120.925 146.195 Pipe 2 x 1.2
15 NH 79 121.130 146.400 Pipe 2 x 1.2
16 NH 79 125.600 150.870 Pipe 1 x 1.2
17 NH 79 125.775 151.045 Pipe 2 x 1.2
18 NH 79 126.079 151.349 Pipe 2 x 1.2
19 NH 79 126.275 151.545 Pipe 1 x 1.2
20 NH 79 126.652 151.922 Pipe 1 x 1.2
21 NH 79 127.700 152.970 Pipe 1 x 1.2
22 NH 79 127.970 153.240 Pipe 4 x 1.2
23 NH 79 127.990 153.260 Pipe 1 x 1.2
24 NH 79 128.172 153.442 Pipe 1 x 1.2
25 NH 79 128.195 153.465 Pipe 4 x 1.2
26 NH 79 128.338 153.608 Pipe 1 x 1.2
27 NH 79 131.141 156.411 Pipe 3 x 1.2
28 NH 79 131.270 156.540 Pipe 1 x 1.2
29 NH 79 131.302 156.572 Pipe 1 x 1.2
30 NH 79 133.181 158.451 Pipe 1 x 1.2
31 NH 79 134.544 159.814 Pipe 1 x 1.2
32 NH 79 136.300 161.570 Pipe 1 x 1.2
33 NH 79 136.464 161.734 Pipe 1 x 1.2
34 NH 79 136.497 161.767 Pipe 2 x 1.2
35 NH 79 137.120 162.390 Pipe 2 x 1.2
36 NH 79 139.233 164.503 Pipe 2 x 1.2
37 NH 79 140.498 165.768 Pipe 3 x 1.2
38 NH 79 140.902 166.172 Pipe 2 x 1.2
39 NH 79 142.651 167.921 Pipe 1 x 1.2
40 NH 79 144.435 169.705 Pipe 3 x 1.2
41 NH 79 144.674 169.944 Pipe 3 x 1.8
42 NH 79 145.090 170.360 Pipe 2 x 1.2
43 NH 79 151.100 176.370 Pipe 2 x 1.2
44 NH 79 155.300 180.570 Pipe 1 x 1.2
45 NH 79 156.540 181.810 Pipe 2 x 1.2
46 NH 79 156.600 181.870 Pipe 1 x 1.2
47 NH 79 157.700 182.970 Pipe 1 x 1.2
48 NH 79 158.700 183.970 Pipe 1 x 1.2
49 NH 76 193.100 233.770 Pipe 3 x 1.2
50 NH 76 186.700 240.170 Pipe 1 x 1.2
51 NH 76 180.600 246.270 Pipe 3 x 1.2
52 NH 76 161.618 264.937 Pipe 1 x 1.2
53 NH 76 160.305 266.250 Pipe 2 x 1.2
54 NH 76 135.800 290.755 Pipe 1 x 1.2

Rajasthan

(m)
55 NH 76 135.700 290.855 Pipe 1 x 1.2
56 NH 76 135.400 291.155 Pipe 1 x 1.2
57 NH 76 134.310 292.245 Pipe 1 x 1.2
58 NH 76 134.185 292.370 Pipe 1 x 1.2
59 NH 76 133.100 293.455 Pipe 1 x 1.5
60 NH 76 132.940 293.615 Pipe 1 x 1.2
2.14 New Rail Over Bridges (ROBs)

In the six laning of the project road, new rail over bridges (ROBs) will be constructed
and existing culverts will be rehabilitated and repaired as per details given in Table 2.20
to Table 2.21.
Table 2.21: New Rail Over Bridges (ROBs)
Sl. No. ROB/RUB Existing Design Proposed Span Total Length Total Width
Chainage Chainage Arrangement of Structure of Structure
(km) (km) (m) (m) (m)
New ROB at
1 1.060 310.465 2 x 30 60 2x13.4
Udaipur Bypass
New ROB at
2 8.440 317.845 2 x 30 60 2x13.4
Udaipur Bypass
ROB
2 X 7.0 + 20
3 412/1 on NH-8 411.150 457.335 34.0 15.2
(Skew)
(RCW)
ROB
3 x 35.62
4 423/1 on NH-8 422.237 468.422 106.86 15.2
(skew)
(RCW)
ROB
2 X 16.28 +
5 431/1 on NH-8 430.672 476.857 68.18 15.2
35.62 (Skew)
(RCW)
Table 2.22: Rehabilitation / Repair of Rail Over Bridges (ROBs)
Sl. No. Road Existing Design Existing Span Total Length Total Width
Chainage Chainage Arrangement of Structure of Structure
(km) (km) (m) (m) (m)
1 NH 79 39.827 60.097 1 x 39.0 39 12.25
2 NH 79 39.827 60.097 1 x 39.0 39 12.25
3 NH 79 96.100 116.370 3 x 30.0 90 12.25
4 NH 79 96.100 116.370 3 x 30.0 90 12.25
5 NH 79 121.068 141.338 23.0.19.6 42.6 12.25
6 NH 79 121.068 141.338 23.0.19.6 42.6 12.25
7 NH 76 145.152 281.403 1 x 38.2 38.2 12.25
8 NH 76 145.152 281.403 1 x 38.2 38.2 12.25
9 NH 76 119.469 307.086 1 x 41.2 41.2 12.25
10 NH 76 119.469 307.086 1 x 41.2 41.2 12.25
2 X 18.0 + 25.1
11 NH-8 466.000 512.185 61.1 2x11.0
(Skew)

Rajasthan
2.15 Retaining Wall / RE Wall

The retaining wall shall be provided at all the approaches to grade separators,
underpasses, interchanges, ROBs and high embankment where the height of
embankment is more than 6.0m.
The RE wall shall be provided at all the approaches to grade separators, underpasses,
interchanges, ROBs where the height of embankment is less than 6.0m.
2.16 Roadside Furniture
The provision of road side furniture has been made as per Manual of Specifications and
in consultation with the Independent Consultant/ Engineer.
(i) Traffic Signs and Pavement Markings
Traffic signs and pavement markings will include roadside signs, overhead signs; curb
mounted signs and road markings along the project highway. Adequate number of
Cat’s eyes and delineators demarcating the edge lines, lane markings and junctions shall
be provided to ensure safety of pedestrians & traffic.
(ii) The cat’s eyes or road studs shall be provided to improve the visibility in night-
time and wet-weather conditions. These shall be prismatic retro-reflective type,
conforming to ASTM D4280.
White color road studs shall be used at locations where lane markings are in white
color. Amber color shall be used where lane markings is in amber color. Red color may
be used to indicate no entry/edge markings.
(iii) Concrete Crash Barrier, Metal beam crash barrier, Separators (MS Railing)
(iv) Boundary fencing for the entire length of the road on both sides
(v) Traffic Safety Devices, as required
(vi) Boundary Stones
(vii) Hectometre / Kilometre Stones
(viii) Traffic Blinker Signals (LED) at intersections
Street Lighting
Lighting shall be provided at following locations:
1. Toll Plaza areas
2. Truck parking areas
3. Top and underside of grade separated structures including flyovers as well as
underpasses
4. All service roads in built up area
Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian guard rails shall be provided at major junctions, truck lay byes, bus bays and
near schools/hospitals.
Landscaping and Tree Plantation
Landscaping of the highway shall be done on, but not limited to, the following:
• Median

Rajasthan
• Grade Separated intersections

• Entry and Exit ramp
• At grade islands of intersection locations
• Toll Plaza Area
2.17 Proposed Truck Lay-byes Locations
In the project road, truck lay-byes have been proposed at locations as given in Table
2.23.
Table 2.23: Proposed Truck Lay-byes Locations
Sl. Existing Chainage Design Chainage
Truck Lay Byes
No Road (LHS) (LHS)
. From To From To Side
1 NH - 79A 20.250 20.550 19.420 19.720 LHS RHS
2 NH - 79A 31.550 31.850 30.720 31.020 - RHS
3 NH - 79A 35.550 35.850 34.720 35.020 LHS -
4 NH - 79 60.050 60.350 85.320 85.620 LHS RHS
5 NH - 79 74.400 74.700 99.670 99.970 LHS -
6 NH - 79 75.500 75.800 100.770 101.070 - RHS
7 NH - 79 101.570 101.870 121.840 122.140 LHS RHS
8 NH - 79 108.115 108.415 133.385 133.685 LHS RHS
9 NH - 79 134.250 134.550 159.520 159.820 LHS RHS
10 NH - 79 150.550 150.850 175.820 176.120 LHS RHS
Chittorgarh
11 28.350 28.650 212.620 212.920 - RHS
Bypass
12 NH - 76 212.550 212.250 214.320 214.620 LHS RHS
13 NH - 76 143.950 143.650 282.605 282.905 LHS RHS
14 Udaipur Bypass 6.050 6.350 315.455 315.755 LHS RHS
2.18 Bus Bays and Bus shelters

In the six laning of the project road, bus bays and bus shelters have been provided as
per details given in Table 2.24.
Table 2.24: Bus Bays and Bus Shelters
Sl. Road Existing Design Bus Bays/ Explanation
No. Chainage Chainage Bus
(LHS) (LHS) Shelters
From To From To (Side)
1 NH - 79A 9.670 9.730 8.840 8.900 LHS RHS Near Chota Udaipur
2 NH - 79A 21.770 21.830 20.940 21.000 LHS RHS Near Srinagar
Near approach road
3 NH - 79 17.840 17.900 38.110 38.170 - RHS
towards Nasirabad
Near approach road
4 NH - 79 17.870 17.930 38.140 38.200 LHS - towards Derathur
Chauraha
5 NH - 79 29.420 29.480 49.690 49.750 LHS RHS Near Rasulpur
Near Bandanwara
6 NH - 79 38.070 38.130 58.340 58.400 LHS RHS
Village
7 NH - 79 51.970 52.030 72.240 72.300 LHS - Near Hiyaliya Gaon

Rajasthan

8 NH - 79 52.470 52.530 72.740 72.800 - RHS Near Vijay Nagar
Near approach road
9 NH - 79 61.820 61.880 82.090 82.150 LHS RHS towards Vijay Nagar/
Biyawar
Near approach road
10 NH - 79 74.870 74.930 95.140 95.200 LHS RHS towards Rupahali/
Barasani
Near approach road
11 NH - 79 75.420 75.480 95.690 95.750 LHS RHS towards Rupahali/
Barasani
Near approach road
towards
12 NH - 79 83.270 83.330 103.540 103.600 LHS RHS
Govindpura/
Kawagiya
Near approach road
13 NH - 79 87.470 87.530 107.740 107.800 LHS RHS towards Kundiya/
Sareli
Near approach road
14 NH - 79 94.320 94.380 114.590 114.650 - RHS
towards Erans
Near approach road
15 NH - 79 94.720 94.780 114.990 115.050 LHS -
towards Raila
Near approach road
16 NH - 79 100.090 100.150 120.360 120.420 - RHS towards Lambia
Station
Near approach road
17 NH - 79 100.350 100.410 120.620 120.680 LHS -
towards Lambia Kala
18 NH - 79 104.510 104.570 124.780 124.840 - RHS Near Beda Village
Near approach road
19 NH - 79 104.580 104.640 124.850 124.910 LHS -
towards Balesharia
Near approach road
20 NH - 79 107.420 107.480 127.690 127.750 LHS RHS towards Balesharia/
Nanakpura
Near approach road
Bhilwara
21 122.845 122.905 143.115 143.175 LHS RHS towards Malola/
Bypass
Dhul Kheera
Bhilwara
22 127.970 128.030 148.240 148.300 LHS RHS Near Panshal Village
Bypass
Near approach road
23 NH - 79 138.365 138.425 158.635 158.695 LHS RHS
towards Karandi
Chittorgarh
24 0.920 0.980 185.190 185.250 - RHS Near Gangrar Town
Bypass
Chittorgarh
25 1.020 1.080 185.290 185.350 LHS - Near Gangrar Town
Bypass
Near approach road
Chittorgarh
26 9.270 9.330 193.540 193.600 LHS RHS towards Chittorgarh/
Bypass
Medikhera
Near approach road
Chittorgarh
27 20.270 20.330 204.540 204.600 LHS RHS towards Kapasan/
Bypass
Chittorgarh
28 NH-76 205.430 205.370 221.440 221.500 LHS RHS Near Panch

Rajasthan

Devla/Sarla Village
29 NH-76 194.530 194.470 232.340 232.400 LHS RHS Near Bansen Village
Near Bhadsoda
30 NH-76 185.630 185.570 241.240 241.300 LHS RHS
Village
Near Ghora Khera/
31 NH-76 180.730 180.670 246.140 246.200 - RHS
Napanya Village
Near Ghora Khera/
32 NH-76 180.430 180.370 246.440 246.500 LHS -
Napanya Village
Near Ghora
33 NH-76 141.980 141.920 284.575 284.635 LHS RHS Bhatewar/
Balabnagar Village
Near approach road
Udaipur
34 6.570 6.630 315.975 316.035 LHS RHS towards Kanpur
Bypass
Khera
Udaipur Near RIICO
35 11.170 11.230 320.575 320.635 LHS RHS
Bypass Industrial Area
2.19 Road Safety for the Project Road
The proposed improvements provisions for road safety in the project road are as given
below:
• MS Crash Barriers on outer side of carriageway wherever the embankment height is
more than 3m.
• Junction Improvements carried out at all major junctions.
• Railings, elaborate road signs, road markings.
• Blinker signals at all major intersections.
• Speed breakers on all side roads.
• Road studs and hazard markers/delineators at intersections and curves.
• Highway patrolling, ambulance measures during operation.
2.20 Typical Cross section
The typical cross sections for bridge locations, vehicular underpasses & rural areas
(without service road & with service road) are shown in following successive figures.

Rajasthan

Rajasthan

Rajasthan

Rajasthan
2.21 Man Power Requirement

For construction of the project road, about 2000 workers including management and
supervisory staff will be deployed. Most of the workers will come from local area.
2.22 Project Implementation Schedule
The construction of the project road will be completed within 36 months from the date
of start of construction.
2.23 Road Safety Audit
Road Safety audit has the greatest potential for improving safety and is most cost –
effective when it is applied to a road or traffic design before the project is built. It can be
conducted on any design proposal that involves changes to the ways road users will
interact, either with each other or with their physical environment. It is a formal process
using a defined procedures.
Road safety audit has been carried out for project road and sufficient measures has been
taken for improving detailed engineering design with respect to the road safety audit.
The details of audit taken are described in Check list below:
Sl.No Contents Item Yes/No Comment
1 Aspects to be A. Safety and operational Yes
checked implications of proposed
alignment and junction
strategy with particular
references to expected
road users and vehicle
types likely to use the
road.
Yes
B. Width options
considered for various Followed relevant IRC codes.
sections.
C. Departures from No
standards and action
taken.
D. Provision of pedestrians,
cyclists and intermediate Yes
transport.
E. Safety implications of the

scheme beyond its Yes
physical limits i.e. how
the scheme fits into its
environs and road
hierarchy.
Yes
2 A1: General Departures from No Followed relevant IRC codes.
Standards
Cross-sectional Yes To suit site conditions
variation Road grades and cross falls are
Drainage Yes adequate for satisfactory

Rajasthan

drainage. Roadside drains
exist at some locations and in
additional earthen drains and
concrete drains are proposed
as per drainage requirement.
Design has taken care of
Climatic conditions Yes temperature and rainfall.
Intersections sight lines were
Landscaping Yes maintained.
Design is adequate in dealing
Services apparatus Yes with overhead services.
Bus lay-byes, truck lay byes
Lay-byes Yes were provided.
Provided at junctions & urban
Footpaths Yes sections
Provided at junctions.
Pedestrian crossings Yes Service Roads provided.
Access (minimize
number of private Not
accesses) Applicable
Emergency vehicles
Not
Public Transport Applicable
Provision of 1.5m paved
Future widening Yes shoulder, 1.0 m earthen
shoulder
Not Access to major adjacent

Staging of contracts Applicable developments has been
designed
Adjacent development
Yes
3 A2: Local Visibility Yes Horizontal and vertical
Alignment alignments satisfy visibility
criteria at all locations.
New/Existing road Yes Sufficient transition zone
interface proposed. All cross roads were
properly designed with main
road.
Safety Aids on steep Yes Provisions of retaining wall
hills. and crash barriers have been
made.
4 A3: Junctions Minimize potential Yes The junctions have been
conflicts rendered to grade separated
one and other major junctions
have been designed at grade
with priority control.
Followed IRC standards.

Layout Yes Horizontal and vertical
Visibility Yes alignments consistent with
visibility. Standards are
appropriate for speed. Free
sight line has been maintained.

Rajasthan
5 A4: Non- Adjacent land Yes Safe access to adjacent land has
motorized been designed.
road users Pedestrians Yes Adequate visibility to cross
provision safely has been made.
Cyclists & Non- Yes Provision of paved shoulder in
motorized vehicles rural areas and service roads at
urban areas have been done.
6 A5: Signs and Lighting Yes Provisions have been made.
lighting
Signs / Markings Yes Provisions have been made.
7 C6: Buildability Not
Construction Applicable
and Operation
Operational Not
Applicable
Network Management No

Rajasthan
5
31
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER – 3 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................1
3.1. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1

3.2. Long Term Scenario “With” And “Without” Project......................................................1
3.3. Consideration of Alternatives ............................................................................................3
3.3.1 Widening Alternatives ................................................................................................ 4
3.3.2 Alternatives for Trees Cutting .................................................................................... 4
3.3.3 Alternatives of Underpass for Settlements .................................................................. 4
3.3.4 Alternatives of Udaipur Bypass .................................................................................. 5
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1: “With” and “Without” Project Scenarios. ............................................................................ 1
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.1: Alignment of Proposed Udaipur Bypass ........................................................................... 5

Rajasthan
5
31
CHAPTER – 3 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
3.1. Introduction
In this section, analysis of alternatives for the project have been discussed. The section
begins with an analysis of the likely resulting scenario “with” and “without” project.
This is based on a quantitative analysis of overall impacts using the Delphi Technique.
Various engineering alternatives for the methods of construction are then considered –
this involves analysis of the environmental, social, engineering, economic and
institutional implications of each option.
The consideration of alternatives of 6 laning of highway is one of the more proactive
sides of environmental assessment - enhancing the project design through examining
options instead of only focusing on the more defensive task of reducing adverse
impacts of a single design. This calls for the systematic comparison of feasible
alternatives for the proposed project site, technology and operational alternatives.
Alternatives are compared in terms of their potential environmental impacts, capital
and recurrent costs, suitability under local conditions and institutional, training and
monitoring requirements.
Examining alternative means of carrying out a project involves answering the following
three questions:
(i) what are the alternatives?,
(ii) what are the environmental impacts associated with each alternative?, and
(iii) what is the rationale for selecting the preferred alternative?
3.2. Long Term Scenario “With” And “Without” Project
Qualitative analysis of the long-term scenarios likely to occur “with” and “without”
project scenario is provided in Table 3.1. The “with” project scenarios will only occur
only if the construction stage are followed and all construction activities are carried out
according to principles of Environment Friendly Road Construction..
Table 3.1: “With” and “Without” Project Scenarios.
Sl. No. Scenario type Long-Term Scenario “With” Project Long-Term Scenario
“Without” Project
1. Environment
A. Physical Environment
Travel time and traffic congestion
Congested road will consume
will reduce as a result of better road
Atmosphere more travel time and will
surface conditions. Overall, a lower
and Climate increase air pollution. No
or similar level of air pollution. No
change in climatic condition
change in climatic condition
No major change in topography and
Topography soils, however, better road will Further deterioration in
and Soils reduce soil erosion and dust present conditions
No change and possibly some

Geology and deterioration in problems due
No Impact
Seismology to naturally weak geological
conditions.
Water Bodies Improved drainage due to No changes in present
and Drainage improvement in drainage structures problems associated with

Rajasthan
5
31
and facilities inadequate drainage.
Possible weakening and
damage to existing drainage
structures causing further
damage to the road.
B. Ecological Environment
About 14,572 numbers of trees exists
within ROW which are going to be
affected by the proposed project No change in vegetation and
Flora
however, through compensatory number of trees.
afforestation @ 1:2 will again
improve the greenery of the area.
Increase disturbance and chances of
illegal hunting during construction
Continued, and possibly
period which will be minimized by
increased disturbance to the
the patrolling of forest department
Fauna fauna. Increased disturbance
during construction. After
and chances of illegal hunting
construction of expressway along
due to overall traffic growth.
with road side fencing/netting
situation will improve positively.
C. Social and Cultural Environment
Traveling may increase time,
Travel times will increased comfort
thereby transportation costs
and safety while traveling.
will increase.
Improved business environment for
Reductions in comfort and
Social and those living along the highway-
safety due to congestion and
Cultural increased passing trade from
deterioration in highway
Environment generated traffic and reduced
condition.
transportation costs for imports and
Business opportunities
exports of the area.
remain largely the same as
before.
D. Institutional Requirements
Training will need to be provided to
relevant PIU officials to improve
their environmental monitoring
capacity during and after project
construction. No institutional
Training of PIU
More staff will need to be recruited strengthening is required.
at the PIU office to enable smooth
flow of all paperwork with regard to
implementation of environmental
policies and regulations.
E. Economic Situation
Higher capital costs for using
Environmental Friendly techniques
No capital costs. However,
for road widening and
increasing road maintenance
Financial strengthening. Costs will also be
and vehicle operating costs as
Implications incurred for training of PIU officials.
road deteriorates and as
Lower vehicle operating costs
travel times increase.
associated with smoother riding
surfaces and shorter travel times.
F Bypass

Rajasthan
5
31
Mangalwara At Mangalwara the project road
traverses in highly congested areas
with both side shops and religious
structures and there is no sufficient
ROW for widening of road from 4-
lane to 6-lane, Hence the best option
for this town in terms of speed,
safety & resettlement is evaluated & In-terms of speed and safety
provision of bypass is suggested will further deteriorated
from km173.00 to 170.00. Proposal of
by-pass is the best solution at this
moment instead of other alternative
(elevated road)
Udaipur Within the Udaipur City, the project
Bypass road is four lanes. For six laning of
project road within Udaipur City,
large scale displacement of
structures will be required and
anticipated social impacts will be
sever. To minimize social impacts,
proposed Udaipur bypass is best
In-terms of speed and safety
alternative.
will further be deteriorated
and social impacts will be
The proposed six lane Udaipur
sever.
bypass will start at km 118.200 near
Debari on NH 76 and end at km
286.800 near Kaya on NH 8. The
proposed six lane Udaipur bypass is
located in Udaipur District. In
general, the terrain is plain, rolling
and partly hilly. The total length of
the proposed bypass is 24.00 km.
G Overall
Long term improved social and Small deteriorations in
environmental conditions but an environmental conditions, no
increase in expenses for project increase in economic
activities during the course of opportunities and increased
project construction. expenses associated with
maintenance.
The project should lead to an overall improvement in environmental and social
conditions. It is, nevertheless important to use environmentally friendly road
construction techniques.
3.3. Consideration of Alternatives
In order to find out the technically and environmentally sound, most feasible and
environmental friendly alignment of the project road, an in-depth study of topographic
survey, physical inspection, environmental and social screening have been carried out.
Many of the alternatives were ruled out prima facie. In the analysis, alternatives were
identified for further study to identify techno-economically and environmentally sound
the best alternatives.

Rajasthan
5
31
3.3.1 Widening Alternatives
Alternatives for widening play very important role in protection of the environment.
Through the selection of right alternative, trees cutting and acquisition of structures can
be avoided in significant numbers.
On details survey, field visits alternative analysis following widening options have been
finalized.
Advantage
• Displacement of shops and houses have been minimized up to great extent even in
settlement area by adopting, realignment, concentric and eccentric widening.
• Cost of resettlement & rehabilitation measures have been controlled up to great
extent by minimising displacement of properties.
• Most of the religious structures, which are sensitive issue for local community have
been avoided under this alternative.
• Affected persons will also be less in comparison to other alternatives.
• Anticipated environmental impact will be relatively insignificant under this
alternative.
Disadvantage
• In concentric widening alternative selected, road safety will be critical issue during
construction phase will require special attention.
3.3.2 Alternatives for Trees Cutting

Six laning of the project road will require cutting of trees along the project road
including proposed Udaipur Bypass. In most of cases, tree cutting will be necessary.
However, efforts have been made to minimize tree cutting by adjusting trees in median.
It is estimated that about 14572 trees will need to be cut for 6 laning of the project road
including proposed Udaipur Bypass.
3.3.3 Alternatives of Underpass for Settlements

While passing the settlements area, 6 lane of the project road may create difficulties for
pedestrian, cattle, carts and vehicles while they want to cross the road. It may result as
increase in accidents rates.
Underpasses will be best alternative to ease this problem during six laning of the project
road. The proposed locations for vehicular underpasses in the design of project road are
given below:
Considering safety of local people and to facilitate the crossing in settlement area,
sufficient numbers of underpasses have been provided. Two pedestrian and cattle
underpass have been provided in the project road.
Advantage
Underpass will provide easy access to cross the road for pedestrian, cattle, carts and
vehicles.
It will minimize the possibility of accidents on the road while crossing the road.
Disadvantage

Rajasthan
5
31
• Cost of construction of underpasses will be relatively higher.
• At some places for construction of underpass, embankment will need to be risen.
3.3.4 Alternatives of Udaipur Bypass

The section of the Kishangarh-Udaipur passes through Udaipur city which is very
congested. Based on surveys and discussions with local authorities, bypass has been
proposed at Udaipur in 24 km length. Alternative Analysis for the Bypass on project
road is as given below:
Figure 3.1: Alignment of Proposed Udaipur Bypass

Rajasthan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER – 4 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................1

4.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................1
4.2 Physical Resources ..................................................................................................................1
4.2.1 Topography and Physiography .....................................................................................1
4.2.2 Soil and Geology............................................................................................................1
4.2.3 Borrow Areas & Stone Quarries ...................................................................................6
4.2.4 Surface And Ground Water Hydrology ........................................................................7
4.2.5 Water Resources ............................................................................................................8
4.2.6 Water Quality .............................................................................................................10
4.2.7 Meteorological Conditions ..........................................................................................13
4.2.8 Ambient Air Quality ...................................................................................................17
4.2.9 Noise Quality ..............................................................................................................20
4.3 Biological Resources ..............................................................................................................21
4.3.1 Flora/ Roadside Trees ..................................................................................................21
4.4 Socio-Economic Environment..............................................................................................23
4.4.1 Archaeological / Historical / Religious Structures ......................................................23
4.4.2 Industries ....................................................................................................................24
4.4.3 Settlements along the Road .........................................................................................24
4.4.4 Seismicity ....................................................................................................................25
4.4.5 Human Health.............................................................................................................25
4.4.6 General Economic Condition ......................................................................................25
4.4.7 Animal Husbandry .....................................................................................................26
4.4.8 Road Safety ..................................................................................................................26
4.4.9 Economic Development ...............................................................................................26
4.5 Social Impact Assessment ....................................................................................................26
4.5.1 Project Influence State – Rajasthan ............................................................................27
4.5.2 Demographic Profile ....................................................................................................28
4.5.3 Profile of Project Influence District ............................................................................28
4.5.4 Profile of Project Influence Villages ............................................................................30

Rajasthan
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.1 : Soil Characteristics along the Project Road ........................................................................ 5

Table 4.2: Stone Source for Various Quarries for the Project Widening ........................................... 6
Table 4.3 : Rainfall Along the Proposed Bypass ................................................................................... 7
Table 4.4: List of Surface Water Bodies along/crossing the Project Road ........................................ 9
Table 4.5: Physico-chemical Characteristics of Ground and Surface Water Along the Project
Road.................................................................................................................................................. 11
Table 4.6: Water Quality along the Proposed Bypass ........................................................................ 12
Table 4.7: Temperature and Humidity................................................................................................. 14
Table 4.8: Wind Speed in the Area........................................................................................................ 15
Table 4.9: Wind Pattern in the Area ..................................................................................................... 16
Table 4.10 : Special Weather Phenomena in the Area ........................................................................ 17
Table 4.11: Techniques Used For Ambient Air Quality Monitoring................................................ 18
Table 4.12: Summary of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring ............................................................... 19
Table 4.13: Ambient Noise Quality Results ......................................................................................... 21
Table 4.14 - Day and Night Time Leq in the Area .............................................................................. 21
Table 4.15: Reserve and Protected Forest along the Project Road .................................................... 22
Table 4.16: Reserved Forest Along the Proposed Bypass .................................................................. 23
Table 4.17: Sensitive/ Historical Location Within 10 km Radius..................................................... 24
Table 4.18: Demographic Profile of Rajasthan State ........................................................................... 27
Table 4.19: Demographic Profile of Udaipur District ........................................................................ 29
Table 4.20 : Demographic Details of Settlements Along the Proposed Udaipur Bypass ............. 32
Table 4.21: Occupational Pattern Along the Proposed Udaipur Bypass......................................... 33
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 4.1: Soil of the Project Area .......................................................................................................... 2

Figure 4.2: Rocks and Minerals in the Project Area ............................................................................. 2
Figure 4.3: Rainfall along The Project Road .......................................................................................... 7
Figure 4.4: Rainy Days along the Proposed Bypass ............................................................................. 7
Figure 4.5: A view of pond at Km 1.8 on NH-79A & River Crossing on NH-76 at Km 200.0 ........ 8
Figure 4.6: Maximum and Minimum Temperatures ......................................................................... 15
Figure 4.7: Monthly Relative Humidity ............................................................................................... 15
Figure 4.8: Monthly Wind Speed .......................................................................................................... 15
The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 4-ii

Rajasthan
Figure 4.9: Religious Structure along the road at Km - 212.700 (LHS) & 185.400 LHS on NH-7624
Figure 4.10: Major settlements along the project road at Km 38.0 & 172.0 on NH-79 ................... 25
Figure 4.11: Vulnerability Zones in India ............................................................................................ 25
Figure 4.12: View of Traffic Congestion at Mangalwada .................................................................. 26
The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 4-iii

Rajasthan
CHAPTER – 4 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT
4.1 Introduction
The project is proposed six lane from Kishangarh to Udaipur including Udaipur bypass
connecting to NH 76 to NH 8 including proposed Udaipur bypass. Environmental
studies for physical, biological and socio economic baseline environmental conditions
along the project road including proposed bypass have been discussed in brief in the
following sub-sections:
The collection of baseline information on biophysical, social and economic aspects of the
project area is the most important reference for conducting environmental impact
assessment studies. The description of environmental settings includes the characteristic
of area in which the activity of the project road including proposed bypass would occur
and cover area affected by anticipated impacts. For conducting environmental impact
assessment, existing environmental conditions along the project road including
proposed bypass, have been obtained by primary data collection, monitoring, sampling
and secondary data collection from published source and various government agencies.
The collection of baseline data was designed to satisfy information requirements and
focused on relevant environment aspects that are likely to be affected by the project
road including proposed Udaipur Bypass.
4.2 Physical Resources
4.2.1 Topography and Physiography

The topography of the entire section of the project road is open and plain. However, at
few places it passes through the rolling terrain & small hill sections.
The topography along the proposed Udaipur Bypass is plain, rolling and hilly terrain.
Physiographically, the area has 4 physical divisions namely valley fills, pediment,
burried pediment and structural hills. The area generally slopes towards south.
4.2.2 Soil and Geology

The soil in the project area is developed under the arid and humid climate over the bed
rocks of complex nature, predominantly under the process of laterization. The soil
resulting from the disintegration of various rocks is of a sandy nature, which results
from Schists and quartzite’s, contains large portion of sand and it is found in most of the
project area. In most of the areas it is very shallow, dry and poor quality. Soil resulting
from granite and gneiss contains a certain amount of clay and is comparatively good
and is found in most of Kishangarh ranges.
The tract is mostly occupied by yellowish brown, sandy loam to sandy clay loam. Soil
texture is weak in structure and is permeable. There is no proper profile development;
solum may be weakly to moderately calcareous and a layer of lime concentration is
present at 100-150 cm depth. The soil pH along the project road and its influence area
varies in between 7.5 to 8.4. The soil of the project area is shown in Figure 4.1.

Rajasthan
Project
Figure 4.1: Soil of the Project Area

The main rocks reported in the project area are the schists, gneisses, migmatites,
quartzite’s and conglomerates of pre-Delhi formation. These rocks are mostly covered
by a mantle of sand and alluvium of recent to sub-recent age. The banded gneisses
complex occurs in most of the areas and is made up of alternates’ band of layers of
granite and biotite geniss or simple granite. The various kinds of rocks and mines
present in the areas are shown in Figure 4.2.
Project
Figure 4.2: Rocks and Minerals in the Project Area

Rajasthan
Geological Formations in the Area

The oldest formation exposed in the area belongs to Bhilwara Super group of Arachean
age. The central and western part of the district is occupied by the younger formations
of Aravali super group and Delhi super group of Proterozoic age. Quaternary and
recent alluvium overlies most of the formations in isolated patches, along river courses
and in the shallow depressions. The stratigraphic succession of the area is as follows:
Age Supergroup Group Lithology
Delhi Gogunda group Calc-schists, gneisses, mica-schists,

Supergroup garnetiferous biotite-schists,
quartzites & migmatites
Rikhabdeo Serpentinite, talc-chlorite-schist,

ultramafic suite actinolite-tremolite schist & asbestos
Proterozoic Jharol group Chlorite-mica schist, calc schist &

quartzite
Aravali Bari lake group Meta volcanics, chlorite schists,

supergroup amphibolite, quartzite &
conglomerate
Udaipur group Phyllite, mica schists, meta siltstone,

quartzite, dolomite, gneisses &
migmatites`
Debari group Meta arkose, quartzite, phyllite,

dolomitic marble & dolomite
------------------------------------------------ unconformity ---------------------------------------------

--------
Archean Bhilwara Mangalwar Migmatites, gneisses, quartzite,

supergroup complex felspathic garneti ferrous mica
schists &para amphibolites
Soil Characteristics
To understand the soil quality in the area, 8 locations were selected for soil sampling.
Composite sampling of soil up to root depth (10-15 cm) was carried out at each location.
The important properties of soil are bulk density, porosity and water holding capacity,
pH, organic matter, Nitrogen, phosphate and potassium. The results of soil analysis are
given in Table 4.1. A brief description of analyzed parameters is given below:
Physical Parameters
The important physical characteristics of soil are bulk density, moisture content, water
holding capacity and texture. A brief summary of physical characteristics are given
below:

Rajasthan
Colour: Colour of soil along the proposed bypass varies from yellowish brown to
brown .
Moisture Content: Moisture content of soil along the proposed bypass ranges from
3.3% to 5.1%.
Water Holding Capacity (WHC): Water holding capacity (WHC) of soil samples ranges
between 36.2 to 43.2 percent.
Bulk Density: Bulk Density of soil is found to be in the range from 1.32 to 1.53 g/cm3.
Chemical Parameters
A brief summary of chemical characteristics are given below:
pH: pH is determined by taking 1:5 ratio of soil and distilled water. pH of soil in the
area is found to be in the range of 7.7 to 8.1. The soil are, therefore, slightly alkaline.
Calcium: Calcium is a highly essential nutrient to plants and affects the activities of
certain enzymes. The soluble calcium content as Ca in the soil samples along the
proposed bypass is found to be in the range of 33.3 to 51.2 mg/100g.
Magnesium: Magnesium is used in plant growth in appreciable amount. It is also active
in enzyme system and has a vital part in photosynthetic process. Magnesium content as
Mg in the soil samples along the proposed bypass ranges from 7.3 to 12.2 mg/100g.
Chloride: Chloride content in soil along the proposed bypass is found to be in the range
of 21.3 to 41.2 mg/100g.
Available Phosphorous: Available phosphorous as PO4 of soil samples along the
proposed bypass ranges from 1.9 to 4.1 mg/100g.
Sulphate: Sulphate content in soil samples along the proposed bypass is found in the
range of 3.9 to 7.3 mg/100g.
Total Organic Carbon: Total organic carbon content in soil samples along the proposed
bypass is found to be low in the ranges from 0.38 to 0.56%.
Potassium: Potassium content as K in soil samples along the proposed bypass is found
in the range of 0.31 to 0. 49 meq/100g.
Kjeldahl Nitrogen: Kjeldahl nitrogen content in soil samples along the proposed bypass
is found in the range of 0.21 to 0.33% by weight.

Six-Laning of Kishangarh-Udaipur Section of NH-79/A, NH-79, NH-76 including Udaipur Bypass in Rajasthan
Table 4.1 : Soil Characteristics along the Project Road

Sn Parameters Unit Nasirabad Ralia Bhilwara Mandpam Mangal wara Debari Kalarwas Kaya
Physical Parameters
Yellowish Brown Brown Brown Yellowish Yellowish Brown Yellowish
1. Colour --
brown Brown Brown Brown
2. Moisture Content % 5.1 4.2 3.9 4.6 3.7 4.7 3.3 4.1
3. Water Holding
% 39.1 37.2 36.2 41.2 37.8 42.3 41.6 43.2
Capacity
4. Bulk Density g/cc 1.32 1.41 1.38 1.34 1.46 1.47 1.53 1.43
Chemical Parameters
5. pH -- 7.8 7.9 7.7 7.8 7.7 7.9 8.1 7.8
6. Calcium (as Ca+) mg/100g 51.2 45.7 39.5 41.5 42.8 41.2 33.3 47.2
7. Magnesium (as
mg/100g 11.8 12.2 9.4 7.8 9.1 8.4 7.3 8.1
Mg+)
8. Chloride mg/100g 41.2 33.6 35.7 29.4 31.5 21.3 29.4 23.9
9. Available
mg/100g 3.4 4.1 2.9 2.2 2.2 2.7 1.9 2.6
Phosphorous
10. Sulphate mg/100g 5.1 5.8 4.6 4.2 3.9 6.4 5.1 7.3
11. Total Organic
% 0.43 0.38 0.46 0.41 0.54 0.51 0.49 0.56
Carbon
12. Potassium (as K) meq/100g 0.39 0.41 0.31 0.44 0.32 0.49 0.37 0.42
13. Kjeldahl Nitrogen
% w/w 0.29 0.34 0.25 0.28 0.21 0.33 0.29 0.31
(as N)

Rajasthan
4.2.3 Borrow Areas & Stone Quarries

During widening of existing 4 lane into 6-lane road including Udaipur bypass, it will be
required to raise the embankment at certain locations along the road beyond the
existing ground level. For doing so extra earth/soils to be used as sub-grade, selected
sub-grade and shoulder materials need to be hauled from designated and approved
borrow areas and stone quarries. The identification of borrow areas and stone quarries
will be done by the BOT contractor during design stage and in their selection, following
care will be taken into account to ensure that:
• Sufficient quantity of suitable soil is available from the borrow pit;
• The borrow areas are as close to the project road as possible;
• The loss of fertile and productive agricultural soil is minimum;
• There is minimum loss of vegetation and fauna;
• The topsoil from the borrow pit will be striped and set aside with microbial
preservation methods.
The six laning of the project road requires cutting and filling. Most of the cutting would
be utilized for embankment and the balance would be dumped in the low – laying areas
within ROW. In most of the sections, existing stone quarries would be operated and
hence rehabilitation would not be necessary. The locations of the some of stone quarries
are given in Table 4.2:
Table 4.2: Stone Source for Various Quarries for the Project Widening
Sl.No. Chainage km Location of Stine Quarry Approximate
distance from the
alignment
1 Up to km 8 of NH-79A Sardarki Dhani near Kishangarh 15 to 23 km
2 Up to km 35 of NH-79A Srinagar-Silor Udaipur Quarry 15 to 30 km
3 Up to km 25 of NH-79 Nasirabad Quarry 15 to 30 km
4 Km 30 to 45 of NH-79 Danta Quarry on Nasirabad 15 to 25 km
Bhilwara road
5 Km 50 to 60 of NH-79 Kheri stone Quarry 15 to 25 km
6 Km 60 to 70 of NH-79 Stone quarry near Khari river 25 km
7 Km 75 to 90 of NH-79 Stone quarry at Jalampur 20 to 30 km
8 Km 90 to 120 of NH-79 Paroda Stone quarry 25 km
9 Km 120 to NH-79 Samodi Stone quarry on Bhilwara 20 to 25 km
10 Km 147 to 170 of NH-79 Gangrar Stone quarry 25 km
11 Km 180 to 183 of NH-79 Chittor Stone quarry 25 km
12 Km 220 to 190 of NH-76 Nimahara Stone quarry 15 to 25 km
13 Km 190 to 172 of NH-76 Bojunda Stone quarry 15 to 25 km
14 Km 172 to 138 of NH-76 Khali Ghati Stone quarry 15 to 25 km
15 Km 172 to 113 of NH-76 Bada Stone quarry 15 to 25 km
16 Km 172 to 138 of NH-76 Dungla Stone quarry 15 to 25 km
17 Km 113 of NH-76 to Dahan Kotna quarry 15 to 25
Udaipur bypass

Rajasthan
4.2.4 Surface And Ground Water Hydrology

A. Surface Water Hydrology
There are few natural streams crossed by the proposed Udaipur bypass, which remain
dry during non monsoon season.
Rainfall
In the area along the project road including proposed bypass, on an average, 664 mm of
rainfall is received annually mainly from south-west monsoon. Rainfall along the
proposed bypass is given in Table 4.3 and presented in Figure 4.3 & Figure 4.4. The
area receives about 90.7 % rainfall during June to September months. About 9.3 %
rainfall is received from October to May months. The study area can be categorized as
moderate rainfall area.
Table 4.3 : Rainfall Along the Proposed Bypass
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
7.0 2.6 9.6 3.0 8.6 85.2 195.4 177.3 117.0 18.5 9.7 2.3 663.8
(0.4) (0.3) (0.3) (0.3) (0.8) (4.7) (9.4) (9.4) (5.9) (1.1) (0.6) (0.3) (33.5)
Note: Rainfall in mm. Values given parenthesis are rainy days.

Source : Indian Meteorological Department
Rainfall (mm)
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Rainfall (mm)
Figure 4.3: Rainfall along The Project Road
Nos of Rainy Days
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Figure 4.4: Rainy Days along the Proposed Bypass

Rajasthan
B. Ground Water Hydrology

The occurrence of ground water in the area is mainly controlled by the topographic and
structural features present in the geological formations. Groundwater occurs mainly
under unconfined condition to semi-confined in saturated zone of rock formation. Its
occurrence is controlled by topography, physiography and structural features of the
geological formations. The movement of the groundwater in hard rock areas is
governed by size, openness, interconnection and continuity of structural weak planes
while in unconsolidated rocks groundwater movement takes places through pore space
between grains.
Aravali Super Group consisting of Phyllites, Quartzites and dolomite form important
aquifer especially around Udaipur. Ground water occurs in weathered zones like
schistosity, joint, fissures and bedding planes. Quartzites generally occur intercalated
with phyllites and are well jointed. Ground water in phylites occurs mainly in fractured
cleavages. The depth to water level varies from 15 to 50 m below ground level where as
depth of wells varies from 25 to 30 m below ground level. The average yield of wells is
around 40 m3/day. The yield of wells varies from 20 to 200m3/ day.
Water Level Fluctuation
Seasonal fluctuation of 0.2 m to 6 m water level during pre and post-monsoon is noticed
in the area.
4.2.5 Water Resources

Road development project often significantly alter the hydrological setting of an area
and add to the siltation and pollution levels of the water resources, generally when new
highway is developed in the region. As this project involves widening and
strengthening of the existing highway including bypass and does not consists any major
water streams accept Wagan at km 200.00 and Banas and Berach River on Chittorgarh
bypass, hence significant impact is not envisaged.
4.2.5.1 Surface Water
There are two perennial surface water resources and three ponds exist along the project
road their details are listed out in Table 4.4. A view of pond at km 1.8 on NH-79A &
River at Km 200 on NH-76 is shown in Figure 4.5.
Pond River
Figure 4.5: A view of pond at Km 1.8 on NH-79A & River Crossing on NH-76
at Km 200.0

Rajasthan
Table 4.4: List of Surface Water Bodies along/crossing the Project Road
Sl Type of Water Chainage Distance from the road
Side Remarks
No Bodies (km) boundary (m)
1 Pond 1.800 Left Within ROW Left side on NH-79A
2 Pond 62.100 Left Within ROW Left Side of NH-79
3 Khari river 62.400 - Crossing the road Crossing at NH-79
Water from Save Dam is located 2km away
4 87.500 Right Crossing at NH-79
Dam from the road at right side
Along the road on
5 Pond 8.000 Right Within ROW
Bhilwara by pass
6 Mansi river 114.000 - Crossing the road Crossing NH-79
7 River Banas 144.000 - - Crossing at NH-79
Crossing at Bhilwara
8 Kothari River 19.000 - Crossing the road
bypass
9 River Wagan 200.00 - - Crossing at NH-76
River Banas and Crossing on
10 - - -
Berach Chittorgarh bypass
4.2.5.2 Drainage and Cross Drainage Structure
The drainage system of the Rajasthan as a whole is influenced by its geological history
and location. The Aravalli ranges which run across the state from the south-west to the
north-east direction largely influence the drainage system of the state. While a major
part of western Rajasthan has an inland drainage system, the southern, the south-
eastern and the eastern part have a well developed drainage system. The major rivers
crossing the project road are Khari, Kothari, Berach, Mansi and Banas.
The project alignment from Kishangarh to Udaipur falls within the Banas river
catchments. The Banas River rising in the Aravallis near Kumbhalgarh, collects major
run-off from Bhilwara, Chittorgarh and Udaipur districts through its tributaries, the
Khari, Mansi, Kothari, Berach, Wagan etc. Completing a journey of about 480 km &
ultimately joins the River Chambal. The catchment area of the river is nearly 45,833
sq.km.
Khari River originated in the hills near Deogarh in Rajsamund district. It flows towards
northeast for about 192 km through Ajmer, Bhilwara and Udaipur districts before
joining the Bans river near Chosala village in Ajmer District. The river crosses the road
near Gulabpura at km 62.400 of NH-79.
Mansi River (tributary of Khari River) also crosses the road after Nanga ka Khera
between chainage km 82.000 and 83.000 of NH-79. A network of canals also crosses the
alignment between chainages km 115.000 to 120.00 and km 85.000 to 87.000 of NH-79.
The catchment area of the Kahri River is nearly 6,268 sq. km.
Kothari River originated in the eastern slopes of the Aravali range near Horera village
in Bhilwara district. The river flows through Rajsamund and Bbhilwara district for
about 551 km in the hilly region, and 100 km through plain, before joining the Banas
near Nandrai village in Bhilwara district. It has a catchment area of nearly 2,341 sq km.
& on the left and right there are canals of this river crossing the road. Kothari River
crosses the Bhilwara bypass at km 19.000. A water irrigation channel runs along the
road on the right side of the road, which crosses the alignment at harnei, before
Hamirgarh. The left main canal crosses the alignment at Bhadalikhera. The catchment
area of the river is nearly 2341 sq km.

Rajasthan
The Berach river, a tributary of Banas river, originates in the hills Northeast of Udaipur
city. It flows northeast for about 157 km in Udaipur, Chittorgarh and Bhilwara Districts
before joining the Banas near Bigod village in Mandalgarh Tehsil of Bhilwara district. It
flows in a hilly region up to Badgaon reservoir and then through plain. River Banas
and Berach cross the project road on Chittorgarh bypass.
Further tributaries of the Berach River, namely Wanbli and Wangan, crosses the road at
various places after the crossing of Berach river. Wagan river crosses the road before
Hajiya Kheri and Bhutia village. River wagan crosses the road alignment at km 200.000
of NH-76 and Wagli River crosses the road before Narayanpura village.
There are also few ponds located along the project alignment in the vicinity of
Kishangarh, Bhilwara, Chittorgarh and Udaipur. The water level of these ponds is
dependent upon monsoon rainfall.
Drainage is a not a major problem along the maximum portion of the road alignment,
However, some problem of drainage has been seen mostly in the built-up stretches
(urban areas).
4.2.6 Water Quality

Water quality along the project road was monitored at seven sampling locations for
ground water & surface water were selected along the project highway. In order to find
out the primary data of existing water quality scenario M/S Mantec Consultants Pvt.
Ltd. Noida has been contracted for the collection and analysis of the ground water
samples. Mantec Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Noida is an approved Environmental laboratory
from Ministry of Environmental and Forests, Government of India, for conducting Air,
Water and Noise quality analysis. The details of the sampling locations and their results
are given in Table 4.5.

Table 4.5: Physico-chemical Characteristics of Ground and Surface Water Along the Project Road
Permissi Permissible
Parameters L-1 L-2 L-3 L-4 L-5 Protocol L-6 L-7 Protocol
ble limit Limits
PH 8.15 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.9 6.5-8.5 IS:10500 7.5 7.6 6.5-8.5 IS:2296
Temp. (0C) 17 17 17 17 17 - IS:10500 16 16 - IS:2296
DO,mg/l 4.2 5 4.4 4.5 4.2 - IS:10500 4.4 4.5 4 IS:2296
Conductivity
226 1115 1200 1230 1300 - IS:10500 410 840 - IS:2296
mhos/cm
TSS, mg/l 4 2 BDL BDL BDL - IS:10500 20 12 - IS:2296
TDS mg/l 130 664 722 720 750 500-2000 IS:10500 250 500 1500 IS:2296
Alk., mg/l 100 428 550 604 620 200-600 IS:10500 160 60 - IS:2296
TH, mg/l 60 280 308 272 256 300-600 IS:10500 168 292 - IS:2296
Ca ,mg/l 52 136 206 92 88 75-200 IS:10500 84 156 - APHA
Mg , mg/l 8 144 102 180 168 - IS:10500 84 136 - APHA
Cl , mg/l 37 146 220 224 217 250-1000 IS:10500 76 189 600 IS:2296
P, mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL - IS:10500 BDL BDL - IS:2296
SO4, mg/l 12 166 14 17 19 200-400 IS:10500 24 39 400 IS:2296
NO3, mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 45-100 IS:10500 BDL 50 IS:2296
Oil & Grease,
Nil BDL BDL BDL BDL - IS:10500 BDL - IS:2296
mg/l
COD mg/l 8 8 BDL BDL BDL - IS:10500 32 24 - IS:2296
BOD, mg/l <3 <2 BDL BDL BDL - IS:10500 4 3 3 IS:2296
Total Coli
form 2 BDL BDL BDL BDL - APHA 50 40 5000 APHA
MPN/100 ml
Fecal coli
form BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL - APHA 3 2 - APHA
MPN/100 ml
Fe, mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.3-1.0 APHA 0.2 0.15 50 APHA
Note- L-1: Ground Tap Water at Nasirabad (Km14.5), L-2: Ground Water (Handpump) near Bhilwara Toll Plaza(Km 85.0) , L-3: Ground
Water (Handpump) at Mandpam (Km 142), L-4: Ground Water (Bore Well) at Mangalwada (Km171.0) L-5: Ground Water(Bore Well) at
Old Udaipur (km 120), L-6: Surface Water(Banas River) near Hamirgarhat L-7: Surface Water (River wagan) at Km 200.0.

Rajasthan
Ground Water Quality Along the Udaipur Bypass

Ground water resources along the proposed bypass alignment were examined for
physico-chemical parameters. The samples were collected and analyzed as per the
procedures specified in 'Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater' published by American Public Health Association (APHA).
Samples for chemical analysis are collected in polyethylene carboys. Selected physico-
chemical parameters have been analyzed for projecting the existing water quality status
in the study area.
These water samples were taken as grab samples and were analyzed for various
parameters and compared with the standards for drinking water as per IS: 10500.
Ground water samples were collected from most commonly used sources along the
proposed bypass. Analysis results for ground water samples are given in Table 4.6.
The colour of ground water samples was less than 2 Hazen units and odour was
unobjectionable while taste was agreeable. In the ground water samples, pH values
were found in the range of 7.7 to 7.9. Total hardness values vary from 238 mg/l to 263
mg/l. Iron contents in the water samples vary from 0.17 to 0.21 mg/l. Chloride contents
range between 145.6 to 162.7 mg/l. It is revealed from observations that all essential
parameters of water samples are well below the prescribed limit for potable water as
per IS: 10500.
Total dissolved solids in the ground water samples ranges between 621 to 712 mg/l.
Calcium contents lie in the range of 63.6 to 74.5 mg/l. Magnesium contents vary in the
range of 18.7 to 20.5 mg/l. Sulphate contents vary in between 42.6 to 52.3 mg/l. Nitrate
contents vary in the range of 1.9 to 2.4 mg/l. Fluoride contents vary in the range of 0.63
to 0.81 mg/l.
On perusal of the tabulated data, it is observed that analyzed values of ground water
samples are well below the prescribed limits for drinking water as per IS: 10500 for all
the parameters analyzed and found suitable for drinking.
Table 4.6: Water Quality along the Proposed Bypass
Sn. Parameters Unit Debari Kalarwas Kaya Drinking Water
Specification
(IS 10500)
Desirable Permissible
Limit Limit in the
Absence of
Alternate
Source
Essential Characteristics
1. Colour Hazen 1.8 1.9 1.6 5 25
Unit
2. Odour -- ----------------Unobjectionable ---- Unobjectio --
---------- n-able
3. Taste -- -------------------- Agreeable ------- Agreeable --
-----------
4. pH -- 7.7 7.9 7.8 6.5 to 8.5 No Relaxation
5. Total Hardness mg/l 238 263 256 300 600
(as CaCO3)
6. Iron as Fe mg/l 0.19 0.21 0.17 0.3 1.0
7. Chlorides as Cl mg/l 145.6 162.7 156.3 250 1000

Rajasthan
Sn. Parameters Unit Debari Kalarwas Kaya Drinking Water

Specification
(IS 10500)
Desirable Permissible
Limit Limit in the
Absence of
Alternate
Source
Desirable Characteristics
8. Total Dissolved mg/l 683 621 712 500 2000
Solids (TDS)
9. Calcium as Ca mg/l 63.6 74.5 68.7 75 200
10. Magnesium as Mg mg/l 19.2 18.7 20.5 30 100
11. Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 42.6 52.3 47.1 200 400
12. Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 2.1 2.4 1.9 45 100
13. Fluoride as F mg/l 0.76 0.81 0.63 1.0 1.5
4.2.7 Meteorological Conditions

The entire project corridor falls in Rajasthan State. The climate of the project area is
characterized by great extremes of temperature and long period of severe drought
accompanied by high wind velocity and low relative humidity to semi-arid conditions
although sharing the characteristic monsoonal variations through the year. It is hottest
region of India.
Ajmer weather is a typical desert type. In the summer time, the climate of Ajmer is very
hot and in winters, it is quite cool. Both in summers as well as in winters, there is a wide
difference in the day and night temperature. Regarding the average temperature in
summers (from April to June), the maximum temp is around 45°C & the winter’s season
is quite chilly. The climatic condition is best during the period of October to March &
ideal time to visit.
The District Bhilwara has a hot dry summer and bracing cold winter. The cold season
starts from December and ends in February and followed by hot summers from March
to the last week of June. The south west Monsoon season which follows, last till about
mid September. The period from mid September to about the end of November
constitutes the post monsoon season.
The District Chittorgarh has also a hot dry summer and bracing cold winter. The mean
maximum and minimum temperature of the district is 45°C & 7°C respectively & the
normal rainfall is 85.21 cms.
The climate of the Udaipur district is moderate without significant seasonal variations.
January is the coldest month while May and June are the hottest months. The mean
temperature is 22°C. Average rainfall at the district headquarter is 85.80 cms.
Climatological (long-term) data is obtained from the closest Indian Meteorology
Department (IMD) station or from any other nearby station, which has been collecting
meteorological data for more than ten years.
Udaipur Meteorology Observatory is the IMD station located close to project area,
therefore, meteorological data for Udaipur IMD station has been used for the project
road.

Rajasthan
Seasons
From Udaipur climatological data, it can be said that the region has four seasons as
follows:
Summer March to June
Monsoon July to September
Post-monsoon October to November
Winter December to February
Temperature
Table 4.7 gives the temperatures at IMD station Udaipur. Highest and lowest mean
daily temperatures are 38.5 oC and 7.2 oC, respectively.
Humidity
Table 4.7 also gives the relative humidity (RH) data at Udaipur. Except during the
monsoon months, air is generally dry particularly in the afternoons. During the
southwest monsoon the humidity is high and is about 82% in the mornings. Summer is
the driest part of the year, the humidity being 25% in the afternoons.
Table 4.7: Temperature and Humidity
Month Mean Daily Mean Daily Relative Humidity
Maximum Minimum 08.30 (%) 17.30 (%)
Temperature Temperature
(oC) (oC)
January 24.2 7.2 65 38
February 27.4 9.8 57 31
March 32.2 15.1 45 27
April 36.4 20.4 37 25
May 38.5 24.3 42 28
June 36.0 24.9 65 50
July 31.0 23.5 79 70
August 29.5 22.6 82 75
September 31.1 21.2 76 65
October 32.7 16.6 62 42
November 29.5 11.6 60 43
December 26.0 8.2 66 43
Annual 31.2 17.1 61 45
Source : IMD Station, Udaipur

Graphical representation of temperature and relative humidity is given in Figure 4.6
and Figure 4.7, respectively.

Rajasthan
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
January March May July September November
Max Min
Figure 4.6: Maximum and Minimum Temperatures
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
January March May July September November
0830 hrs 1730 hr
Figure 4.7: Monthly Relative Humidity

IV. Wind Speed
Table 4.8 gives the wind speed data at Udaipur IMD Station. Annual average wind
speed is 3.4 kmph. Highest average monthly wind speed is observed in June (6.8 kmph)
while lowest (1.2 kmph) in November month.
Table 4.8: Wind Speed in the Area
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
1.8 2.3 3.1 4.1 5.5 6.8 5.5 4.2 3.2 1.8 1.2 1.4 3.4

Graphical presentation of mean monthly wind speed is shown in Figure 4.8.
Wind Speed (kmph)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Figure 4.8: Monthly Wind Speed

Rajasthan
V. Wind Direction
Wind Pattern for the area is given in Table 4.9. The prevailing winds blow from W-SW
sector towards E-NE sector during April to September. During October and March
winds blow from E-NE. Calm period varies 10 to 95 % of the total time.
Table 4.9: Wind Pattern in the Area
Sn Months N NE E SE S SW W NW Calm
1. January 4 1 0 0 0 1 3 5 86
4 10 14 6 2 9 9 3 43
2. February 4 1 1 0 0 2 5 5 82
2 11 13 5 6 16 14 6 27
3. March 4 1 0 0 1 3 6 6 79
7 6 7 3 6 18 19 12 22
4. April 4 2 1 0 1 4 9 11 68
5 5 3 2 7 23 25 13 17
5. May 4 2 1 2 6 20 14 10 41
3 3 2 2 9 32 26 13 10
6. June 1 1 1 3 11 42 15 6 20
2 2 3 3 12 41 20 6 11
7. July 1 1 0 1 8 33 15 4 37
2 1 3 4 13 38 20 5 14
8. August 1 1 1 1 8 26 17 7 38
2 1 1 3 12 34 22 6 19
9. September 2 2 0 0 4 12 11 10 59
4 4 2 2 7 27 23 9 22
10. October 3 1 0 0 1 1 3 3 88
5 6 4 2 4 9 11 7 52
11. November 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 95
1 5 6 3 2 3 4 3 73
12. December 5 1 1 0 0 1 3 3 86
3 7 10 2 3 6 4 2 63
Annual 3 1 1 1 3 12 9 6 64
3 5 6 3 7 21 16 7 32
Source: IMD Station Udaipur

VI. Cloudiness
Skies are generally clear or lightly clouded except during the monsoon season when
heavily clouded to overcast conditions prevail.
VII. Special Weather Phenomena
Special weather phenomena are given in Table 4.10 for the area. Thunder occurs on an
average 27.8 day in a year. Hail, dust storm and squalls are rare in the region. Fog
occurs occasionally for about 0.1 days.

Rajasthan
Table 4.10 : Special Weather Phenomena in the Area

Months Hail Thunder Fog Dust Storm Squall
January 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
February 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
March 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
April 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
May 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.3 0.0
June 0.1 5.9 0.0 0.1 0.0
July 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
August 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
September 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
October 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
November 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0
December 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Annual 0.2 27.8 0.1 0.4 0.0
4.2.8 Ambient Air Quality

The baseline status of the ambient air quality has been established through a
scientifically designed ambient air quality monitoring network and is based on the
following considerations:
• Meteorological conditions on synoptic scale;
• Topography of the study area;
• Representatives of regional background air quality for obtaining baseline status; and
• Representatives of likely impact areas along the project road.
Frequency and Parameters for Sampling
Ambient air quality monitoring has been carried out with a frequency of two days per
week at 7 locations. The baseline data of air environment is monitored for the below
mentioned parameters:
• Particulate Matter (PM2.5);
• Particulate Matter (PM10);
• Sulphur dioxide (SO2);
• Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX); and
• Carbon monoxides (CO);
Sampling and Analytical Techniques
PM2.5 and PM10 have been estimated by gravimetric method. Modified West and Gaeke
method (IS-5182 part-II, 1969) has been adopted for estimation of SO2. Jacobs-
Hochheiser method (IS-5182 part-IV, 1975) has been adopted for the estimation of NOX.

Rajasthan
Samples for Carbon Monoxide were analyzed using NDIR techniques were used for
estimation. The techniques adopted for sampling and analysis are given in Table 4.11
along with the minimum detection limits for each parameter.
Table 4.11: Techniques Used For Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Sn. Parameter Technique Minimum Detectable
µg/m3)
Limit (µ
1. Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Gravimetric Method 1.0
2. Particulate Matter (PM10) Gravimetric Method 1.0
3. Sulphur dioxide Modified West and Gaeke 5.0
4. Nitrogen Oxide Modified Jacob & Hochheiser 5.0
5. Carbon Monoxide Non Dispersive Infrared 1
Spectroscopy (NDIR)
Ambient Air Quality Along the Project Road

Rajasthan
Ambient air quality along the project road was monitored at 7 locations for parameters
viz: Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX), Carbon Mono Oxides (CO),
Particulate Matter (PM2.5) and Particulate Matter (PM10). Summary of ambient air
quality monitoring is presented in Table 4.12:
Table 4.12: Summary of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Location Range Mean 98 %
Nasirabad (Km 14.5)
PM2.5 26-34 30 32
PM10 56-69 62 67
SO2 9.6 - 12.9 10.8 11.8
NOx 15.7 - 18.5 16.5 18.1
CO 924 - 1154 978 1123
Raila Village Near Toll Plaza (Km 85.0)

PM2.5 29 - 37 32 35
PM10 61 - 76 67 73
SO2 10.4 - 15.2 11.7 14.8
NOx 16.2 - 19.1 18.3 18.7
CO 956 - 1202 1109 1187
Mandpam (Km 142.0)

PM2.5 26 - 46 41 43
PM10 62 - 83 74 81
SO2 13.2 - 17.3 16.1 16.7
NOx 19.1 - 21.6 20.1 20.6
CO 1117- 1257 1187 1206
Mangalwara (Km 171.0)

PM2.5 29 - 38 32 36
PM10 72 - 79 74 76
SO2 12.5 - 15.1 13.1 14.6
NOx 16.1 - 18.5 16.9 17.2
CO 967 - 1124 1034 1091
Debari (Udaipur Bypass)

PM2.5 31 - 39 35 36
PM10 61 - 72 65 69
SO2 11.7 - 13.5 13.2 13.1
NOx 16.3 – 18.8 17.6 18.2
CO 984 - 1165 1034 1132
Kalarwas (Udaipur Bypass)

PM2.5 21 - 29 25 27
PM10 51- 65 58 63
SO2 9.8 - 12.7 11.2 12.1

Rajasthan
Location Range Mean 98 %

NOx 14.1 - 16.7 15.8 16.2
CO 663 - 889 734 864
Kaya (Udaipur Bypass)

PM2.5 27 - 32 29 31
PM10 61 - 69 64 63
SO2 12.2 - 15.2 13.7 14.8
NOx 14.5 - 18.3 15.9 17.6
CO 912 - 1106 963 1088
Monitored values are compared with National Ambient Air Quality Standards
prescribed by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) for residential, rural and
industrial areas.
Ambient Air Quality Status
National air quality standards for rural, residential and industrial area, along the
proposed bypass are met for monitored parameters (PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NOx and CO) for
all AAQM locations.
4.2.9 Noise Quality

Road noise levels depend on many factors such as traffic density, type and condition of
the vehicles plying on the road, acceleration/deceleration/gear changes/level of
congestion and smoothness of road surface.
Sound Pressure Level (SPL) measurements were undertaken at locations, with an
interval of about 5 seconds over a period of 10 minutes per hour for 24 hr. The day
noise level has been monitored during 6 A.M. to 10 P.M. and night levels during 10 P.M.
to 6 A.M. at locations.
On the spot measurement device manufactured by Castle Associates, England is used.
The sound level meter measures the Sound Pressure Level (SPL), the maximum sound
pressure level (Max) and the equivalent continuous noise level (Leq) by switching on
the corresponding function mode. Time constant for fast, slow, impulse and peak
responses are provided and the suitable response conditions can be selected by
operating other switch. The operation of a resetting button permits to erase the
maximum hold and integrated values.
For noise levels measured over a given period of time interval, it is possible to describe
important features of noise using statistical quantities. This is calculated using the
percent of the time certain noise levels are exceeded during the time interval. The
notation for the statistical quantities of the noise levels are described below:
• L10 is noise level exceeded 10% of the time;
• L50 is noise level exceeded 50% of the time; and
• L90 is noise level exceeded 90% of the time.
Equivalent Sound Pressure Level (Leq)
The Leq is the equivalent continuous sound level, which is equivalent to the same
sound energy as the actual fluctuating sound measured in the same period. This is

Rajasthan
necessary because sound from noise source often fluctuates widely during a given
period of time. This is calculated from the following equation:
L eq(hrly) = L50+ (L10 - L90)2/60
Also:
• Lday is defined as the equivalent noise level measured over a period of time during
day (6 A.M. to 10 P.M.).
• Lnight is defined as the equivalent noise level measured over a period of time during
night (10 P.M. to 6 A.M.).
Ambient noise quality results are as given in Table 4.13:
Table 4.13: Ambient Noise Quality Results
Locations Category Noise Level
Average Day Average
dB(A) Night dB(A)
Commercial/ 54.0
Nasirabad (Km 14.5) 66.2
Residential
Commercial/
Raila Village Near Toll Plaza (Km 85.0) 64.2 48.0
Residential
Mandpam (Km 142.0) Industrial 66.5 52.8
Commercial/
Mangalwara (Km 171.0) 62.5 46.5
Residential
Old Gate near Udaipur at km 120.00 of Commercial/
65.6 52.8
NH-76 Residential
Residential 55.0 45.0
Standards Industrial 75.0 70.0
Commercial 65.0 55.0
Day and night-time Leq have been calculated from hourly Leq values and compared
with the stipulated standards. Table 4.14 gives the day and night-time Leq noise levels.
Measured Leq noise levels are within the limit stipulated for residential area along the
Udaipur Bypass.
Table 4.14 - Day and Night Time Leq in the Area
Locations Day Time dB(A) Night Time dB(A)
Debari (Residential) 53.3 43.7
Matoon (Residential) 52.1 40.3
Kalarwas (Residential) 52.5 41.1
Dakan Kotda (Residential) 51.6 39.7
Kaya (Residential) 52.5 43.5
4.3 Biological Resources
4.3.1 Flora/ Roadside Trees

The study area linking Kishangarh to end of Udaipur passs through Kishangarh,
Nasirabad, Gulabpura, Bhilwara (bypass), Chittorgarh bypass, Mangalwara and
Pratapnagar covering NH-79A, NH-79 and NH-76. Kishangarh – Udaipur project road
is a four lane road & having 315 km length. The widening of the existing four lane road
to six lanes would require the 60 m ROW in open area & 45 m in urban/settlement area.
To assess the existing baseline ecological status and the likely impact of on biological

Rajasthan
resources, terrestrial ecological survey of the project corridor have been carried out with
reference to listing of species and ecological conditions of the corridors.
As per revised classification of the Indian Forest by Champion and Seth, the natural
Forest of the tract (except that of Aravallis) has been placed in sub-ground 6-B i.e.
Northern Tropical Thorn Forest. The major plant species along the road are Babul,
Lucina, Khair, Neem, Amaltas, Khejri, Shisham, Kikar, Safeda etc., but survival rates are
very poor. It is also found that road side plantation in the state of Rajasthan is declared
as protected forest, so that permission from the forest department is mandatory for
felling of any tree along the road.
There is no endangered /endemic flora or fauna within the study area.
No national park / Sanctuary / Bird Breeding are located within 10 km on either side of
the project road however; the affected forest areas of along the project road are given in
Table 4.15.
Roadside trees will have an important impact pertaining to this project. This adverse
implication needs to be taken into consideration with compensatory plantation along
the proposed alignment. The road stretch has multiple rows of various species on either
side such as Babool, Lucina, Neem, Siris, Shisham, Kikar, Safeda etc. and dominant
species is Lucina. Entire linear plantation along the road (within ROW) is notified as
protected forest.
The project road also passes through some blocks of Reserve Forest and notified
protected forest (linear plantation) as given in Table 4.15. However, No land diversion
is proposed at these locations because land is already diverted during 4 laning of the
road.
Table 4.15: Reserve and Protected Forest along the Project Road
Sl.
Chainage Location Legal Status Side Remarks
No.
Km 2.0 to 3.5 of NH- Chottamala
1 Protected Forest Crossing Protected Forest
79A Forest Block
Km 10.8 to 11.6 of Baramala
2 Protected Forest Crossing Protected Forest
NH-79A Forest Block
Gowaliya-
Km 47.5 to 48.2 of
3 Singawal Protected Forest Crossing Protected Forest
NH-79
Forest
Raila Forest
nursery and
Km 96.0 to 108 of Raila Forest
4 Protected Forest Crossing hurda and Bir
NH-79 nursery
Rayisan Pura
plantation
Km 199 to 201 of Delawas
5 Protected Forest L/S Protected Forest
NH 79 Forest Block
Km 150.0 to 163.8 of Hamirgarh to Road side Road side
6 B/S
NH-79 Gangrar plantation plantation
Km 214.0 to 166.0 of Rithola to Road side Road side
7 B/S
NH-76 Mangalwar plantation plantation
8 Km 119 to 121.0 Dabari Reserved Forest L/S Reserved Forest
Mongalwar to Road side Road side
9 Km 165.0 to 112.0 B/S
Pratapnagar plantation plantation
The other Protected/ Reserved Forests located within 10 km from the proposed project
road included the following:

Rajasthan
• Protected forest near village Madanganj about 2.0 km away to the right side of the
road at chainage km 2.0 of NH-79A.
• Srinagar protected forest about 1.6 km away at chainage km 10.0 to 11.8 of the NH-
79A
• Protected forest near village Kranthi about 7.2 km away at chainage km 45 of NH-79
• Protected forest near Narayan Sagar about 5.0 km away at chainage km 62.0 of NH-
79
• Katharia Reserved forest to the left off 5 km at chainage km 212 of NH-76
• Swaipur Reserved forest to right side off 3.2 km at chainage km 45.0 of NH-79
Forest Along the Udaipur Bypass
The proposed bypass is passing through Reserve Forest areas (both sides) in
approximate 4 km length. Details of forest areas along the proposed bypass are given in
Table 4.16:
Table 4.16: Reserved Forest Along the Proposed Bypass
Sl. From To (km) Side Name of Forest
No. (km)
1. 3.100 4.000 Both Side Hinglasha Reserved Forest (RF)
2. 9.350 11.450 Both Side Hora RF
3. 17.800 18.500 Both Side Samar Block A Reserved Forest
4. 21.050 21.400 Both Side Samar Block C Reserved Forest
In the project road, 46.6292 ha forest land will be diverted for non forestry use for six
laning including Udaipur Bypass.
Rare or Endangered Species
No rare or endangered species found in the area along the proposed ROW of proposed
Udaipur bypass.
Environmental Sensitive Locations
There is no wildlife sanctuary, national park or eco-sensitive area along the proposed
Udaipur bypass and within 10 km distance from project corridor.
4.4 Socio-Economic Environment
4.4.1 Archaeological / Historical / Religious Structures

There are no archaeological sites / monuments or historical places in the project area
within 60 m of corridor. The project highway traverses through a number of settlements
and is dotted with religious and cultural properties, which though not of archaeological
significance are nevertheless, very significant to the community. A View of religious
structure presence along the project corridor is depicted in Figure 4.9.

Rajasthan
Figure 4.9: Religious Structure along the road at Km - 212.700 (LHS) & 185.400 LHS on
NH-76
About 64 temples and 10 dargah/mosques on left side and 73 temples, 3
Dargah/mosques and 1 church exists on right side of the road within 60 m ROW.
Other sensitive locations / place of historical significance are presented in Table 4.17.
Table 4.17: Sensitive/ Historical Location Within 10 km Radius
Sn Locations
1 Old fort and Hanuman temple near Gangrar 2.5 km away from the project road
2 Ancient Minar (Tower) and pond, off 2.5 km away from project road near Mandal
3 Savaria Mandir an ancient temple 8 km away from project road near Bhathsoda
4 Kalajibavji ancient temple and pond located along the road side to the left and right sides
respectively at Bhatewar
5 Chittorgarh fort about 7 km away from the project road in Chittorgarh
6 Chaturbhujaji ancient temple and old fort the right side about 1.6 km away near Dabok,
and
7 Rajarajeshwar Mahadev temple and Trimukhi bawari (dugwell), near Debari
4.4.2 Industries
The project road passes through Industrial area at three locations viz- Silora, Bhilwara
and Mandpam.
4.4.3 Settlements along the Road

There are numerous settlements along the project road. Nasirabad, Bandanwara,
Vijaynagar, Gulabpura Mangalwada etc, are some big settlement located along the
project road. Details of settlements along the project road are presented in the Annexure
& its view of presence are depicted in Figure 4.10.

Rajasthan
Figure 4.10: Major settlements along the project road at Km 38.0 & 172.0 on NH-79
4.4.4 Seismicity
The project area does not have any history of severe earthquake damage. As per state
wise seismic zonation (Seismic Zoning Map IS: 2000), the project road falls in the state of
Rajasthan and concerned districts are Ajmer, Bhilwara, Chittorgarh and Udiapur. The
project area falls under seismic zone I, II and III, means that project road falls under
very low to moderate damage risks zone. A Vulnerability Zones is depicted in Figure
4.11.
Figure 4.11: Vulnerability Zones in India
4.4.5 Human Health

The survey of human health problems along the road suggests that inhabitants of urban
areas mostly complain about the increase in respiratory illness in the form of asthma,
recurrence of cold and cough. There was no acute diseases are reported in the project
area due to road construction and operation.
4.4.6 General Economic Condition

The project area represents rural as well as industrial and economy is mainly based on
agricultural/ industries. The main cereal crops are wheat, barley, maze, millet, gram
and Pulses.
Majority of people living in the project area belong to the middle and lower middle
class. Caste hierarchy seems to exist in the social strata. Primary occupation of the
people living along the project highway is agriculture/industries and transport related

Rajasthan
activities. Activities also include services like small workshops, dhabas, spare parts of
automobile etc.
4.4.7 Animal Husbandry

Cows, buffaloes, goats and sheep’s are the main livestock of the project area.
4.4.8 Road Safety

Human safety is an important issue along the road as road is used by pedestrians,
cyclists, animals, herdsmen as well as bullock carts, scooters, cars, buses, vehicles
carrying hazardous industrial goods and trucks. These combinations create hazardous
conditions for all the road users. Poor pavement structure and lack of warning /
informatory signs and incidental parking particularly in urban stretches seem to be the
reasons for accidents on the road. The number of serious accidents is correlated with the
total number of accidents involving heavy vehicles. It has been observed that accidents
involving trucks and buses constitute about 80% of the total accidents.
Traffic congestion is noticed during survey, especially in urban areas, a view of traffic
congestion is depicted in Figure 4.12.
Figure 4.12: View of Traffic Congestion at Mangalwada
4.4.9 Economic Development

4.4.9.1 Mineral Development
No mining or mineral development activities found along the project corridor.
4.4.9.2 Agriculture along the Project Road and Proposed Bypass
The alignment of the proposed bypass is partly traversing through agricultural land.
There are two harvest seasons and the principal cereal crops grown in the area are
wheat, barley, millets, maize, jowar, etc. and major pulses are gram, pea and tur. The oil
seeds are mustard, linseed, groundnut and castor seed.
4.5 Social Impact Assessment
The preceding exercise has helped in identifying the potential social issues along the
corridor. The outputs coupled with the results of preliminary community consultation,

Rajasthan
which was carried out at selected locations along the project corridors helped in
identifying the potential social issues.
4.5.1 Project Influence State – Rajasthan

Located in northwest India, Rajasthan borders Punjab in the north, Haryana and Uttar
Pradesh in the northeast, Madhya Pradesh in the east and Gujarat in the south. On the
western side, it shares a long stretch of border with the neighboring country Pakistan.
Demographic profile of Rajasthan State is given in Table 4.18.
Table 4.18: Demographic Profile of Rajasthan State
Total
Description
Total Rural Urban
No. of Household 9317675 7054434 2263241
Total Population 56507188 43292813 13214375
Total Population (Male) 29420011 22426640 6993371
Total Population (Female) 27087177 20866173 6221004
Population (0-6 years) (Total) 10651002 8587389 2063613
Population (0-6 years) (Male) 5579616 4486277 1093339
Population (0-6 years) (Female) 5071386 4101112 970274
Schedule Caste (Total) 9694462 7739926 1954536
Schedule Caste (Male) 5067679 4042156 1025523
Schedule Caste (Female) 4626783 3697770 929013
Schedule Tribe (Total) 7097706 6717830 379876
Schedule Tribe (Male) 3650982 3445719 205263
Schedule Tribe (Female) 3446724 3272111 174613
Literate (Total) 27702010 19205424 8496586
Literate (Male) 18047157 12946326 5100831
Literate (Female) 9654853 6259098 3395755
Illiterate (Total) 28805178 24087389 4717789
Illiterate (Male) 11372854 9480314 1892540
Illiterate (Female) 17432324 14607075 2825249
Total Worker (Total) 23766655 19856423 3910232
Total Worker (Male) 14695802 11379536 3316266
Total Worker (Female) 9070853 8476887 593966
Main Worker (Total) 17436888 13962042 3474846
Main Worker (Male) 12841318 9771540 3069778
Main Worker (Female) 4595570 4190502 405068
Main Worker Cultivator (Total) 9582029 9407373 174656
Main Worker Cultivator (Male) 6210884 6089141 121743
Main Worker Cultivator (Female) 3371145 3318232 52913
Main Worker Agricultural Laborer (Total) 1008417 965480 42937
Main Worker Agricultural Laborer (Male) 654162 623075 31087
Main Worker Agricultural Laborer (Female) 354255 342405 11850
Main Worker Household Industry (Total) 501312 317220 184092
Main Worker Household Industry (Male) 373083 235591 137492
Main Worker Household Industry (Female) 128229 81629 46600
Main Other Worker (Total) 6345130 3271969 3073161

Rajasthan
Total
Description
Total Rural Urban
Main Other Worker (Male) 5603189 2823733 2779456
Main Other Worker (Female) 741941 448236 293705
Marginal Worker (Total) 6329767 5894381 435386
Marginal Worker (Male) 1854484 1607996 246488
Marginal Worker (Female) 4475283 4286385 188898
Marginal Worker Cultivator (Total) 3558037 3514001 44036
Marginal Worker Cultivator (Male) 851842 842224 9618
Marginal Worker Cultivator (Female) 2706195 2671777 34418
Marginal Worker Agricultural Laborer (Total) 1515302 1471086 44216
Marginal Worker Agricultural Laborer (Male) 401170 386076 15094
Marginal Worker Agricultural Laborer (Female) 1114132 1085010 29122
Marginal Worker Household Industry (Total) 176679 129471 47208
Marginal Worker Household Industry (Male) 46445 33689 12756
Marginal Worker Household Industry (Female) 130234 95782 34452
Marginal Other Worker (Total) 1079749 779823 299926
Marginal Other Worker (Male) 555027 346007 209020
Marginal Other Worker (Female) 524722 433816 90906
Non Worker (Total) 32740533 23436390 9304143
Non Worker (Male) 14724209 11047104 3677105
Non Worker (Female) 18016324 12389286 5627038
Source: Census Record 2001.
4.5.2 Demographic Profile

Rajasthan is the eighth largest State in India. According to the Census Records 2001,
population of Rajasthan is 56507188 contributing to 5.49% of the total country’s
population. Of this, 43292813 are males and 13214375 are females. Percentage of
Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe population is 17.16 per cent and 12.56 per cent,
respectively. Similar, proportion at India level is 17.16% and 8.2%, respectively. Sex
ratio i.e. number of females per 1000 males for the State is 921 as compared to 933 at
India level.
The population density of Rajasthan is 165 persons per sq.km, little less than half of that
of India. Rajasthan ranks 24th in population density amongst all the States in India.
4.5.3 Profile of Project Influence District

Udaipur with its several lakes and picturesque setting is a major tourist destination for
both domestic and international tourists. Over the years it has earned several epithets
such as “City of Lakes”, “City of Gardens”, “Venice of the East”. Maharana Udai Singh,
as the secure capital of the Princely State of Mewar founded Udaipur in 1559 after
Chittor fell to Mugal Army. Udaipur is strategically located amidst a saucer shaped
basin, in the Valley of Ahar River. It is surrounded by hills of Aravali Range on all sides.
The selection of the site was made in part because of its isolation and inaccessibility,
favoring its defense.
As per 2001 Census, the population of the Udaipur district is 2633312, out of which
1336004 are males and 1297308 are females. The male population constitutes 50.73%
while female population is 49.27%.

Rajasthan
The rural population is 2142995 and urban population is 490317 in Udaipur District. The
rural population constitutes 81.38% and urban population 18.62% of the total
population in the Udaipur district. The density of the population according to the 2001
census is 196 persons/sq.km, which is much below than the density of Rajasthan state
(165 persons/sq.km).
As per 2001 census records, sex ratio for Udaipur district is 971. Udaipur District has
scheduled castes population of 6.01%, while scheduled tribes population is 47.86% of
the total population of the district.
As per 2001 census records, 47.67% population of the Udaipur district is literate, 59.71%
amongst males and 35.28% amongst females.
In the Udaipur District, total main workers account for 27.50% (42.74% males and,
11.81% females) whereas marginal and non-workers, respectively, account for 14.31%
(8.75% males and 20.03% females) and 58.19% (48.51% males and 68.17% females),
respectively.
Out of total main workers in the district, agricultural labourers account for 3.95% (3.05%
males and 7.29% females) followed by cultivators at 50.96% (47.04% males and 65.58%
females), household industry workers at 2.76% (2.68% males and 3.08% females) and the
rest are other workers at 42.33% (47.23% males and 24.05% females).
Demographic details and employment pattern of Udaipur district are presented in
Table 4.19.
Table 4.19: Demographic Profile of Udaipur District
Total
Description
Total Rural Urban
No. of Household 507829 409278 98551
Total Population 2633312 2142995 490317
Total Population (Male) 1336004 1078441 257563
Total Population (Female) 1297308 1064554 232754
Population (0-6 years) (Total) 491708 429387 62321
Population (0-6 years) (Male) 252402 219276 33126
Population (0-6 years) (Female) 239306 210111 29195
Schedule Caste (Total) 158257 109234 49023
Schedule Caste (Male) 81119 55713 25406
Schedule Caste (Female) 77138 53521 23617
Schedule Tribe (Total) 1260432 1231814 28618
Schedule Tribe (Male) 634953 619425 15528
Schedule Tribe (Female) 625479 612389 13090
Literate (Total) 1255399 890057 365342
Literate (Male) 797694 589772 207922
Literate (Female) 457705 300285 157420
Illiterate (Total) 1377913 1252938 124975
Illiterate (Male) 538310 488669 49641
Illiterate (Female) 839603 764269 75334
Total Worker (Total) 1100880 946081 154799
Total Worker (Male) 687892 558276 129616
Total Worker (Female) 412988 387805 25183

Rajasthan
Total
Description
Total Rural Urban
Main Worker (Total) 724120 582322 141798
Main Worker (Male) 570972 448878 122094
Main Worker (Female) 153148 133444 19704
Main Worker Cultivator (Total) 369004 365994 3010
Main Worker Cultivator (Male) 268576 266391 2185
Main Worker Cultivator (Female) 100428 99603 825
Main Worker Agricultural Laborer (Total) 28605 27681 924
Main Worker Agricultural Laborer (Male) 17436 16860 576
Main Worker Agricultural Laborer (Female) 11169 10821 348
Main Worker Household Industry (Total) 20020 12016 8004
Main Worker Household Industry (Male) 15305 9103 6202
Main Worker Household Industry (Female) 4715 2913 1802
Main Other Worker (Total) 306491 176631 129860
Main Other Worker (Male) 269655 156524 113131
Main Other Worker (Female) 36836 20107 16729
Marginal Worker (Total) 376760 363759 13001
Marginal Worker (Male) 116920 109398 7522
Marginal Worker (Female) 259840 254361 5479
Marginal Worker Cultivator (Total) 213402 212538 864
Marginal Worker Cultivator (Male) 53537 53310 227
Marginal Worker Cultivator (Female) 159865 159228 637
Marginal Worker Agricultural Laborer
(Total) 90933 90063 870
(Male) 24100 23785 315
(Female) 66833 66278 555
Marginal Worker Household Industry
(Total) 7696 6219 1477
(Male) 2306 1823 483
(Female) 5390 4396 994
Marginal Other Worker (Total) 64729 54939 9790
Marginal Other Worker (Male) 36977 30480 6497
Marginal Other Worker (Female) 27752 24459 3293
Non Worker (Total) 1532432 1196914 335518
Non Worker (Male) 648112 520165 127947
Non Worker (Female) 884320 676749 207571
Source: Census Record 2001.
4.5.4 Profile of Project Influence Villages

The settlements along the bypass alignment will be primarily affected due to
construction of the proposed bypass.

Rajasthan
4.5.4.1 Demographic Features of the Project Influence Villages

Demographic details of settlements to be affected by the proposed bypass have been
extracted from the Census records 2001. Detailed demographic data and occupational
details of such settlements have been presented in Table 4.20 and Table 4.21. Summary
of demographic data have been summarized in following subsections:
Total Population of the Project Influenced Settlements
The total population in the project influence villages is 30444, out of which males
accounts for 51.72% and females for 48.28% of total population of the project affected
settlements.
Distribution of Rural/Urban Population in the Project Affected settlements
Along the proposed bypass, all affected settlements are rural.
Sex Ratio of the Project Influence Area
Average sex ratio in the project influence settlements is 934.
4.5.4.2 Social Characteristics of the PIA Settlements
Literacy Rate
In the project influence settlements, average literacy rate is 51.0%, out of which 63.5%
among males and 37.6 % among females.
Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Population in the PIA Settlements
Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe population in the project influence settlements have
been analysed and presented in Table 4.23. The scheduled caste (SC) population in
project influence settlements are 1594 while schedule tribe population is 11929. The
average of percentage of scheduled caste and schedule tribe population in the project
influence settlements are 5.2% and 39.2%, respectively.
Work Participation
The average worker participation in project affected settlements is 29.6%, which
includes the marginal workforce. This reflects low employment scenario in project
affected settlements.
Economy
Economy of the project affected settlements largely depends on agriculture. About 34%
of the total work force of the project influence area depends directly or indirectly on
agriculture. Only small population in the villages along the proposed bypass is engaged
in traditional crafts for their lively hood.
The irrigation facilities are not adequate in the area. Tanks and wells, etc. contribute to
some extent to provide irrigation facilities.

Table 4.20 : Demographic Details of Settlements Along the Proposed Udaipur Bypass
Sl. Name of Settlements Type of House Population Schedule Caste Schedule Tribe Literate
No. Settlements holds T M F M F M F M F
I. District Udaipur
1 Debari Rural 1124 5512 2894 2618 291 264 396 384 2073 1442
2 Jharnon Ki Sarai Rural 90 465 224 241 26 20 50 66 124 84
3 Dagiyon Ki Pancholi Rural 255 1373 699 674 5 8 335 314 371 159
4 Deimata Rural 82 346 174 172 0 0 124 113 16 3
5 Kamlod Ka Doongar Rural 3 18 7 11 0 0 3 7 3 3
6 Bhoeyon Ki Pancholi Rural 242 1137 604 533 10 15 137 121 443 319
7 Kanpur Rural 925 4566 2430 2136 173 136 242 215 1754 985
8 Kalarwas Rural 522 2877 1490 1387 115 79 465 471 1088 596
9 Matoon Rural 271 1363 694 669 93 96 191 181 516 336
10 Kharbariya Rural 245 1258 639 619 14 12 149 130 442 272
11 Eklingpura Rural 304 1829 932 897 36 35 149 149 633 301
12 Biliya Rural 133 625 322 303 47 49 158 138 240 166
13 Phanda Rural 171 887 458 429 0 0 400 371 290 192
14 Dhol Ki Pati Rural 192 1082 567 515 0 0 427 410 373 115
15 Dakan Kotra Rural 467 2581 1294 1287 28 17 967 978 563 236
16 Saweena Khera (Rural) Rural 230 1194 586 608 14 11 452 487 291 133
17 Kaya Rural 639 3331 1731 1600 0 0 1430 1358 777 178
Total 5895 30444 15745 14699 852 742 6075 5893 9997 5520
Source: Census Records 2001 for Udaipur District

Table 4.21: Occupational Pattern Along the Proposed Udaipur Bypass

Sl. Name of Total Main Main Workers Marginal Non Workers
No. Settlements Workers Cultivators Agricultural Household Other Workers Workers
Labourers Industry
M F M F M F M F M F M F M F
1 Debari 1259 72 91 6 0 1 26 2 1142 63 189 74 1446 2472
2 Jharnon Ki Sarai 108 22 11 0 0 1 14 1 83 20 1 3 115 216
Dagiyon Ki
3 Pancholi 336 158 85 86 54 48 4 2 193 22 25 39 338 477
4 Deimata 81 3 32 1 5 1 0 0 44 1 20 80 73 89
Kamlod Ka
5 Doongar 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 4 3 6
Bhoeyon Ki
6 Pancholi 209 18 37 4 2 4 4 1 166 9 78 168 317 347
7 Kanpur 1306 527 584 437 9 28 50 18 663 44 108 224 1016 1385
8 Kalarwas 693 82 157 38 11 10 7 4 518 30 59 306 738 999
9 Matoon 312 32 42 3 0 0 2 0 268 29 25 19 357 618
10 Kharbariya 315 62 121 49 0 0 4 2 190 11 16 73 308 484
11 Eklingpura 499 66 202 29 6 1 10 4 281 32 74 403 359 428
12 Biliya 192 12 97 10 0 0 0 0 95 2 0 1 130 290
13 Phanda 249 187 45 129 0 0 1 2 203 56 5 34 204 208
14 Dhol Ki Pati 264 15 23 5 1 0 3 3 237 7 19 9 284 491
15 Dakan Kotra 553 44 149 23 7 0 9 4 388 17 101 240 640 1003
Saweena Khera
16 (Rural) 291 167 10 4 5 7 3 2 273 154 3 1 292 440
17 Kaya 662 209 197 155 11 3 6 1 448 50 360 626 709 765
Total 7332 1677 1883 980 112 104 143 46 5194 547 1084 2304 7329 10718
Source: Census Records 2001 for Udaipur District

Fdocuments - in - Six Laning of Kishangarh Udaipur Ahmedabad Feasibility Study For 6 Laning of

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fdocuments - in - Six Laning of Kishangarh Udaipur Ahmedabad Feasibility Study For 6 Laning of

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Six Laning of Kishangarh-Udaipur-

Ahmedabad Section of NH-79A, NH-79, NH-

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT &

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT & MANAGEMENT PLAN

CHAPTER - 0: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................... EX-01 to EX-11

CHAPTER - 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1-1 to 1-14

CHAPTER - 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................... 2-1 to 2-44

CHAPTER - 3: ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES .................................................................... 3-1 to 3-5

CHAPTER - 4: DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT .......................................................... 4-1 to 4-33

CHAPTER - 5: ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION

CHAPTER - 6: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN............................................... 6-1 to 6-10

CHAPTER - 7: PROJECT BENEFITS ......................................................................................... 7-1 to 7-2

CHAPTER - 8: SOCIAL ASSESSMENT .................................................................................. 8-1 to 8-29

CHAPTER - 9: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .......................................... 9-1 to 8-45

ANNEXURE-1: COMPLIANCE OF TOR ............................................................................. A-1 to A-15

ANNEXURE-2.1: ALLIGNMENT MARKED ON TOPO SHEET .................................. A2-1 to A2-11

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-i

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-1

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-2

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-3

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-4

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-5

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-6

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-7

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-8

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-9

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-10

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA Ex-11

CHAPTER – 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1

Table 1.1: Applicable Environmental Regulations ............................................................................. 12

Figure 1.1: Stages to obtain the Prior Environmental Clearance ........................................................ 4

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-i

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-1

1.5 Environmental Clearance Process

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-2

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-3

Figure 1.1: Stages to obtain the Prior Environmental Clearance

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-4

1.5.1 Clearance Requirements for the Project

The Air (Prevention and

3. Forest Clearance for Forest (Conservation) Act State Forest Department/

4. Cutting of Trees on Forest (Conservation) Act District Forest Office/Forest

1.5.2 Methodology Adopted For Environmental Impact Assessment

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-5

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-6

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-7

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-8

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-9

(xxxi) Examine road design standards, safety equipment specifications and

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-10

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-11

1.8.1 Applicable Environmental Regulations

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-12

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-13

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 1-14

CHAPTER – 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................1

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 2-i

Table 2.1: Details of Service Roads on the Project Road ...................................................................... 3

Figure 2.1: Project Index Map.................................................................................................................. 1

The Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA 2-ii